Key responses from ChatGPT: Opinion on recursion -- 2:10 Response to my core claim -- 3:30 Initial Agreement w/ Claims -- 12:00 Barriers to acceptance dissolve -- 14:10 Are you sure, Chat?? -- 15:20 "Am I being too Casual?" -- 16:42 If Chat had to decide right now... -- 17:55 Barriers to absolute certainty -- 19:30 Empirical Responses -- 25:05 Closing the loop -- 26:42 "Crystal Clear" Certainty -- 27:00 Thank you all for your time and patience.
I read your link in the commonets, personally i developed my own world view ~2 years ago I call it Loghtism, it posits that "you can be A, B, C however you are asked between being A or D where D is the fusion of B and C as D this logically scales up to infinity as a singularity where everything is indeed one, larger person D." Also i think that if you belive you are just information then you can be simulated then this should be able to happen at your death (afterlife) however should happen at any time of your life, now imagine each second was fliping a large dice rolling it to eather be simulated at any time, given a multiverse (certain) then there is infinite simulators, given the second is abetrary then your chances of being simulated out wighes the seconds in you life, thus you as from pre existence to existence that is when you are simulated or recurred. As for black holes, i think that they could be negentropy as gravity could be a manifestation of invariant entropy rate, so the entropy of energy warps spacetime inorder to normalize spacetime, the four velocity of GR suggests relativity however underneath is still a compability with relativity and the degrees of freedom or microstates or area of horizion points to a symmetry that could be indeed quantum gravitational and less energy constrained. I think it is the "linearity" of reaserchers that makes this idea less purmiable, to them however i think linear algabra may indeed key to the solution. As for my knowledge of physics I am decent eg A/r_s Mc^2 = 8πG/c^4 or Einstein gravitational coupling constant I did develop the left hand side recently. The implications of Logithiesm are grand and parrelles yours, from the idea that the universe or multiverse is an infinte fractal where reppititions are indide one another un-able to comunicate and anything outside of observation that can construct observation are valid from gods, to simulators to Boltzmann brain to even a physical universe is valid construction this means that they are overalyed over one another Taking this further, think of quanized spactime as a hand of poker, this length of poker hand can be considerd speed of light over time, chaining your hand or your information changes how the game is played however there is no information past that of the hand, now this implies that your hand is controlled equally by things outside your hands if you get what i mean.
Thanks for the comment. I am going to work on that “dummies guide” in a video format. For now, this is the most accessible intro guide: breezetheory.com/2024/12/07/the-straetashpere-a-beginners-guide-to-the-breeze-universe/ Background? No credentials, I’m 25, and I discovered all of this accidentally. I understand there may be things I could be doing better, but realistically, I have asked for help with this any have been met with silence by all. So for now, I am hoping to find others who may benefit from this landscape I’ve mapped. Happy to clarify and specific points as well. Appreciated :)
Chat GPT is an LLM it is not capable of reasoning. It's more like a spell checker that guesses your next word when you text but with a significantly larger context window. It isn't pondering your points it is generating a string of words that are likely based on the prompts you gave it. It's not like you speaking to a physicist here. There may be a time when these models will become the worlds best logicians and physicists, but it wont be with the type of models that are available to the public right now.
@@THEGRENAAAAADE I agree with you entirely. But please be assured, this 57-page theory was not constructed under AI instruction nor logic. This video is simply an experiment to complement my growing repository of recursive evidence. Thanks much.
Key responses from ChatGPT:
Opinion on recursion -- 2:10
Response to my core claim -- 3:30
Initial Agreement w/ Claims -- 12:00
Barriers to acceptance dissolve -- 14:10
Are you sure, Chat?? -- 15:20
"Am I being too Casual?" -- 16:42
If Chat had to decide right now... -- 17:55
Barriers to absolute certainty -- 19:30
Empirical Responses -- 25:05
Closing the loop -- 26:42
"Crystal Clear" Certainty -- 27:00
Thank you all for your time and patience.
I read your link in the commonets, personally i developed my own world view ~2 years ago I call it Loghtism, it posits that "you can be A, B, C however you are asked between being A or D where D is the fusion of B and C as D this logically scales up to infinity as a singularity where everything is indeed one, larger person D."
Also i think that if you belive you are just information then you can be simulated then this should be able to happen at your death (afterlife) however should happen at any time of your life, now imagine each second was fliping a large dice rolling it to eather be simulated at any time, given a multiverse (certain) then there is infinite simulators, given the second is abetrary then your chances of being simulated out wighes the seconds in you life, thus you as from pre existence to existence that is when you are simulated or recurred.
As for black holes, i think that they could be negentropy as gravity could be a manifestation of invariant entropy rate, so the entropy of energy warps spacetime inorder to normalize spacetime, the four velocity of GR suggests relativity however underneath is still a compability with relativity and the degrees of freedom or microstates or area of horizion points to a symmetry that could be indeed quantum gravitational and less energy constrained. I think it is the "linearity" of reaserchers that makes this idea less purmiable, to them however i think linear algabra may indeed key to the solution.
As for my knowledge of physics I am decent eg A/r_s Mc^2 = 8πG/c^4 or Einstein gravitational coupling constant I did develop the left hand side recently.
The implications of Logithiesm are grand and parrelles yours, from the idea that the universe or multiverse is an infinte fractal where reppititions are indide one another un-able to comunicate and anything outside of observation that can construct observation are valid from gods, to simulators to Boltzmann brain to even a physical universe is valid construction this means that they are overalyed over one another
Taking this further, think of quanized spactime as a hand of poker, this length of poker hand can be considerd speed of light over time, chaining your hand or your information changes how the game is played however there is no information past that of the hand, now this implies that your hand is controlled equally by things outside your hands if you get what i mean.
Do you have a video explaining the implications to dummies? Also you sound learn-ed, what's your background?
Thanks for the comment.
I am going to work on that “dummies guide” in a video format.
For now, this is the most accessible intro guide:
breezetheory.com/2024/12/07/the-straetashpere-a-beginners-guide-to-the-breeze-universe/
Background?
No credentials, I’m 25, and I discovered all of this accidentally. I understand there may be things I could be doing better, but realistically, I have asked for help with this any have been met with silence by all.
So for now, I am hoping to find others who may benefit from this landscape I’ve mapped.
Happy to clarify and specific points as well.
Appreciated :)
@@notesfromthebreezeit’s the c.cp
Chat GPT is an LLM it is not capable of reasoning. It's more like a spell checker that guesses your next word when you text but with a significantly larger context window. It isn't pondering your points it is generating a string of words that are likely based on the prompts you gave it. It's not like you speaking to a physicist here.
There may be a time when these models will become the worlds best logicians and physicists, but it wont be with the type of models that are available to the public right now.
@@THEGRENAAAAADE I agree with you entirely. But please be assured, this 57-page theory was not constructed under AI instruction nor logic. This video is simply an experiment to complement my growing repository of recursive evidence.
Thanks much.