Sack of Constantinople 1204 - Fourth Crusade DOCUMENTARY
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2021
- The first 100 people to go to www.blinkist.com/kingsandgene... are going to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out. You’ll also get 25% off if you want the full membership!
New Kings and Generals animated historical animated documentary series on the Byzantine-Crusader-Bulgarian Wars, as well as the Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople, fragmentation and restoration of the Eastern Roman Empire and Frankokratia, continues with an episode on the sack of Constantinople in 1204. We will try to explain the events that led the Crusaders and Venetians to sack the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire.
Previous videos on the Crusades, Bulgaria, and the Byzantine Empire:
Rise of Bulgaria - Battle of Tryavna 1190 - • Rise of Bulgaria - Eve...
What Was Lost in the Sack of Constantinople - • What Was Lost in the S...
Varangians - Elite Bodyguards of the Byzantine Emperors - • Varangians - Elite Bod...
Siege of Damascus 634 - Arab - Byzantine Wars - • Siege of Damascus 634 ...
Byzantine Empire Strikes Back - Battle of Nikiou 646 - • Byzantine Empire Strik...
Siege of Constantinople 717-718 - Arab-Byzantine Wars - • Siege of Constantinopl...
Pliska 811 - Byzantine - Bulgarian Wars - Pliska 811 - Byzantine - Bulgarian Wars
Versinikia 813 - Byzantine - Bulgarian Wars - • Versinikia 813 - Byzan...
Third Crusade 1189-1192: From Hattin to Jaffa - • Third Crusade 1189-119...
Basil II - Reformer, Restorer, Bulgarslayer - • Basil II - Reformer, R...
Creation of the Medieval Roman Army - • Creation of the Mediev...
Strategikon - Army Manual of the Eastern Roman Empire - • Strategikon - Army Man...
Medieval Battles - • Early Muslim Expansion...
Support us on Patreon: / kingsandgenerals or Paypal: paypal.me/kingsandgenerals or by joining the youtube membership: / @kingsandgenerals We are grateful to our patrons and sponsors, who made this video possible: docs.google.com/document/d/1o...
The video was made by Martin Stamatov, while the script was researched and written by Georgi Kolev. This video was narrated by Officially Devin ( / @offydgg & th-cam.com/channels/79s.html.... The art was created by Nergiz Isaeva. Machinimas by MalayArcher on Total War: Attila engine.
✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/kingsand...
✔ Patreon ► / kingsandgenerals
✔ Podcast ► www.kingsandgenerals.net/podcast/
✔ PayPal ► paypal.me/kingsandgenerals
✔ Twitter ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Facebook ► / kingsgenerals
✔ Instagram ► / kings_generals
✔ Discord ► / discord
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound: www.epidemicsound.com
#Documentary #SackofConstantinople #Crusades
discord.gg/DpuRAMa75V
We have officially opened our discord to all of our fans. If you want to become a member of our growing community where you can get extra content, behind the scenes, and participate in a unique game where four historical factions compete in various writing challenges, each with a set of bonuses related to the faction timeline. Enhance your Kings and Generals experience and join the ranks of our most dedicated fans/
Well done guys. Just one question.
Why are some parts of this video so different than the previous version covering the same incident?
@@peymanmostafaei6963 we added a few more sources to the research
Please do not use the term “Byzantine Empire” when there is the term “Eastern Roman Empire”. This would be truer both historically and logically.
Well done brothers. Thank you. And when I was reading the rules. I was reading the rules as the narrator of the video narrates the stories. 😅😅.
Just love this channel !
@@albatros33 but they can say eastern roman empire also called the byzantine empire. This is more correct in my opinion!
Venice destroyed Eastern Roman Empire, which lead to the Ottoman's expansion, their wars against Venice, and, as a result, decline of the Venice itself.
The masters of their own demise...
Congratulations, you played yourself.
@sebâstian turnayev Fine, just don't spam this question everywhere. Ottoman Empire, Sultanate of Rum, Cumania and the Khazars.
Byzantines used Oghuz Turkic mercs. Remember this the Ottomans easily taken so many cities as the Oghuz Turkic mercs were not getting paid.
Byzantines are the ones who should blame themselves. Bad luck you reap what you sow.
"As you sow, so you reap" ;)
Writing this script was a huge challenge, I did my best to show the context and all the moving pieces that led to this outcome. Imagine trying to organize all of your friends to go on a field trip half the world away that has never been done, during one of the most chaotic times in Europe. Then the main organizer of the event dies and only a third of the people show up. Along the way many had doubts, but most kept on going just so they could get it over with and they all failed.
Alexios IV didn’t last, the crusaders never went to Jerusalem and Venice missed out on establishing ports in Egypt. As for the Empire, no matter what happens after, it was a shadow of its former self.
I recommend rewatching the first episode of the series to truly understand why this side quest didn’t come out of nowhere.
I will be here answering your questions so ask away :)
Бате бате в следващия епизод Калоян ще го бие ли много?
They all failed? Bro ask kings and generals for a few weeks off to chill if you need. Your works good, don’t let yourself get burned out.
Why ppl have such a reaction about the fall of Constantinople?
Why don’t they feel this pain when the crusaders slaughter all the Jews and Muslims in Jerusalem as it fell during the first crusade !
Additionally, if something is based on hate then it will eat itself and this crusade prove it (by destroying Constantinople
Thank you !
@@kingmaverick3140 you are comparing two very very different things. Also, crusades came after the Muslim conquests
I'm literally still mad this happened
Same
Yeah I still hold a grudge too
@sebâstian turnayev Ottoman Empire, Great Hun Empire, Timurids, Avar Khanate and Golden Horde
@@enginduygu6028 add Seljuks, Zangids, the persian speaking Turks Ghaznavids and many more.
Move on. The empire is long gone and dead. Accept it, move on, study it, remember it, but don’t get angry about an event that’s already over. Last thing we need is more unnecessary violence and bloodshed over nationalistic nonsense.
After defeating numerous sieges throughout its history, it was fellow Christians who took Constantinople
@@brunolima7402 As west was always aggressive towards Byzantium, & greeks were starving while italians were thriving... They had it coming.
Totally acceptable imo.
@@Ntopios Were Byzantine multiracial like Romans?
@@user-qc1ok4kk5m Greek-speaking, multiethnic and Christian Orthodox.
@@Ntopios The only cause that led to "greeks were starving while italians were thriving" was the total incompetence and lust of power of the most of the Byzantine leadership. While the maritime republics were constantly enterprising in everything they could do, the greek noble houses were just fighting themselves and in the end they had to become reliant on the republics. Venice got many commercial bonuses after saving the byzantine ass from the norman fleet, still the ungrateful byzantines managed do kill the latins in the latins massacre. So yes, it's totally acceptable.
@@WFASPigeonGang Wow ok. So you're going to pretend the Italian cities didn't sieze power from the empire? Like, they funded the Serb uprising & conquered the last Roman holds in Italy.
So yes, a totally acceptable blow imo
English Kings’ names: Richard the *Lionheart*
Byzantine Emperors’ names: *JOHN KOMNENOS THE FAT*
@sebâstian turnayev Seljuks were who brought Turks to Anatolia. After they defeated Byzantine at the battle of Manzikert in 1071, Turks started to settle in almost the entire Anatolian plains. After a short while Mongols defetaed Seljuks at the battle of Kösedağ, Seljuks were dissolved and various Turkic beyliks were formed in Anatolia, one of those beyliks were the Ottomans
@Maruf Ahmed Golden Horde is not Turkic, they're Mongolian. Timurids and Mughals are Mongol/Turkic. Huns are not confirmed to be Turkic by the scholars, They originate from Central Asia but they could be Proto-Turks or Proto-Mongolians or both
Bulgarian Tsar: Kaloyan The Roman slayer
Or Konstantinos the Gladiator, Basil II the Bulgarslayer, etc.
@sebâstian turnayev Gokturks: first Turkic Empire. Streching from north China to Uzbekistan. Was divided in 8th century to eastern and western empire.
Pechenec Khanate: Pechenec were ine of many Turkic people that inhabited wild plains (Ukraine and southern Russia). They replaced previous turkic khanate, rulled by Khazars. Pechenecs, weren't very rich like Khazars, because they were in constant fight with Rus, Byzantines and other Turkic people like Bulgars. They would migrate eventually to Balkans and modern Romania, where after defeat from Byzantines they would sieze to exist. Most of them would assimilate between Greeks, Bulgarians, Romanians, Hungerians and Serbs, ehile those that remained in Wild Stepps were butchered by Mongols.
Sledjuk Empire: the ancestors of Turks and Azeri came in 11th century as the latest Turkic migrants. They would briefly unite entire Middle East, including Byzantine Anadolia, before fracturing in infightings. Ehat remained for long time was Sultanate of Rum in Anadolia. They eoild be subjegated by Mongols and after fall of Illkhanate (Mongol state in Anadolia and Iran), Anadolia would be full of small bayleks fighting among themselves.
Timurid Empire: Established by Tamerlane who centered his power in Uzbekistan. He conquered all land from Syria to northern India and slaughtered more people then Hitler. His Empire would last for only 100 years more or less, but it revived Persian culture so much that time of Timruid Empire is often called Timurid Rennesaince.
Ottoman Empire: the last Turkic Empire founded as one of bayleks in Anadolia, but would rise into multiethnic Empire. They would decline with 19th century with nationalism in Balkans and Arabic world as well as Europeans trying to colonize it, until Ataturk established modern Turkey.
Crusaders: We’re going into Constantinople.
Eastern Rome: To take back the Holy Land?
Crusaders:
Eastern Rome: To take back the Holy Land right?
Nice!
They were pawns of homelander in disguise.
*Sad Alexios IV noises*
I'm going to make a meme out of it and post in on 9gag.
Although it has been probably posted before...
@sebâstian turnayev Yeah sure, I’ll list them out for you
1.Göktürk Empire
2.Ghaznavid Empire
3.Seljuk Empire
4.Timurid Empire
5.Ottoman Empire
Hope this helps!
Otherwise known as the biggest own goal in history
When looking at history, these a-holes could've taken the entire Middle East and North Africa easily if they just joined together and cooperated. But they were so busy with stabbing each other in the back and squabbling for minor land and titles, that they lost any notion of doing anything. This just shows that having elevated idiots - "aristocrats/nobility" - doing the decisionmaking, is often a terrible blunder that ends up causing more harm than good.
@@ParleLeVu the crusaders had a hard time taking Jerusalem, why would you think they had a chance to conquer the whole Middle East?
@@zatorith Because these numbskulls didn't have to be crusaders. They could simply gather their armies, band up and take the known world. But killing your brother for slight slights was apparently more important than giving more to both him and yourself in those days.
@@ParleLeVu bro you're talking in hindsight as if you would do all this if you were born at that time pretentious af
@@ParleLeVu Its have been a thing since the start of civilization. If we all work with each other we could have achive something truly wonderful. But its the human nature that prevent us from doing that
Immagin the confusion of the Muslims when news of this sack reached them
They must have been drinking Sherbat on that occasion
In this day I'm very confused about this
well as u say what abt ,arabs backstabing turks and ending caliphate??
Maybe shocked but maybe to some who have known the politics in the west would have probably some idea that this was kinda expectable because most Catholic states hate the Byzantines.
Funnily around this time the Islamic world would have another shock that would make the Crusades (which was never really anything special to most Muslims at the time apart from the Ayyubids.) look childish in comparison, the Mongols
In many ways, I've considered this the true end of Byzantium. After the Nicaeans retook the city in 1264, it was little more than just a small kingdom, dependent on the whim of its neighbors. That it was able to linger on for nearly 200 more years is actually a testament to the diplomatic skills of the Byzantines.
That's not really true. By the end of the 13th century, they had emerged as a fairly significant power again. The first 2 Palaiologos rulers pretty much managed to restore the pre-1204 territory of the empire (or perhaps even expand it), but for sure, the sack proved to be crucial in the long run.
However, they were still in the game, there was everything to play for, before the empire descended into endless civil wars.
@@martinusv7433
History is replete with 'last rally' streams of events. In restoring much of what was held previously (minus Epirus, Trebizon, and what remained of the most populaced areas of Anatolia from which Byzantium had traditionally gotten most of its manpower, remember that even during the reestablishment, Byzantium was using mostly mercenaries in their armies - a very expensive solution brought on because they already didn't have the manpower to support the effort), Byzantium largely burned up all its remaining political, economic, and manpower potential.
Isaac the 2nd at least tried. Alexios the 3rd on the other hand...
@@jeffreyestahl Having the greatest city in the world was what allowed them to survive so long.
"Look at how they massacred my boy."
*Cries in Greek*
Venetian are the first Mafia 😁
@@ironheart5830 Venetian Mafia huh.. I hate to say it but that actually has a nice ring to it.
@@ironheart5830 Fun fact: Citizens of Constantinople were sick and tired of Italians because they would often clash betwean themselves and make chaos, especially Venitians and Genoese
@@ironheart5830 wasn't the crusaders Germanic?
@@thekraken1173 *dies*
The big domino in the fall of our Empire.
@@ericbooth3393 No idiot Pope's are in charge and the greed on both sides Byzantines include are toxic.
How good attack in Trible condition?
This would have never have happened if Belisarius was immortal.
@@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 Speaking of those fuck heads Romanos IV Diogenes is perfect example and the first domino in the down fall of our empire.
@ Luiz
They didn't even subvert anyone.
Most of the famous emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire were Illyrian and Armenian.
Belisarius above was Illyrian for example as it was Jusitinain the Great
Apparently the crusaders looted Justinian’s and Heraclius’ tomb.
So sad...
After Justinian's death everything seemed to just fall apart...
@@Georgios1821 Oh I know, but Rome never reached the heights it saw after Justinian. All hope of reclaiming the west were gradually fading.
Not surprised
The Franks were always like that lol
@sebâstian turnayev Are you just gonna spam this everywhere?
I've always heard this story in a simple narrative of "traitorous Venetians" but apparently this is more nuanced and interesting than that. Felt like a CK3 game.
Actually when you think about it, history is so full of stuff like this. If everyone did their job, the world would be a different place. For an example if crusaders did their job to fight muslims, or emperors did their job to rule, or popes did their job to ONLY attend to religious matters. Or if the vassals did their job and remained loyal to their liege. Or warriors did their job to stand and fight. List goes on like that...
@@emirkeremklc1945 "If men were like angels no government would be necessary at all"
@@emirkeremklc1945 exactly. Whenever we hear about the fourth crusade we always think about an innocent victimized Byzantine empire being betrayed by treacherous greedy foolish zealous Crusaders. But in the end the Byzantine themselves where the most instrumental in the sacking of Constantinople. Their petty intrigues and squabbling and Alexio’s ineptitude and him failing to to foresee this disaster by his own doing of promising payment and then not delivering is the main reason for the crusaders sacking the city
@sebâstian turnayev Timurids were Uzbek not Kazakh
@@hippie_and_theman_podcast3627 Great minds think alike, I gave similar comments (if less eloquent) before I found this one.
Crusaders: "Aren't these guys supposed to be Chri..."
Venice: "MONEY!"
Crusaders: "You make a great point."
LOL
@@mahmoudelkazaz1007 yes lol
Thats not realy true. Biznatine Empire gave genuan and venician merchants and citizen right to live and trade on their territory. But later venecian cities were destroyed, and venecians slaughtered for their money
@@michaburek3628 that was not carried out by the Emperor. It was some mob who went out of control. While the sack of Constantinople was pretty well orchestrated by Venice.
@@michaburek3628 I’m sure there wasn’t any extreme amount of arrogance that led to that lol.
It's enough to make a grown man cry
Perhaps one of the most defining moments of the Eastern Mediterranean, with bordering nations taking advantage of the immense power vacuum, eventually condemning the Balkans.
Which we will cover in the following 3 episodes of this series, so stay tuned
@@KingsandGenerals Nice to hear more I hope you guys cover the Nicean-Latin wars and Michael VIII.
Manzikert was the moment when the byzantine empire became a shadow of its former self
And the 4th crusade was the first nail on a coffin already made
Not really Manzikert, because the losses could be recovered from, but civil war that followed.
Byzantines had the same problems which plagued the late Roman Empire, which were internal conflicts and constant civil wars for status of emperor. In the end their biggest enemy (as usual) were themselves. Even Sack of Constantinople started from one pretender enlisting help of Latins to fight another pretender.
@@masterexploder9668
Mehmed II: 🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃🦃
@@orkoskang7967 he's... a turkey?
One of the saddest events in Western history... they took so much more than they knew.
Pavia and Arques were much more tragic, who cares about Byzantines?
It kinda saddened me a bit while watching. Such a great city being sacked and burned down.
@@user-pj1fd4es9y OH man they were from where arabs got their knowledge.
@@user-pj1fd4es9y CONSTANTINOPLE IS 10X THESE POOR CITIES
@@feudaljester7581 Bro call it as istanbul😂!!
Gotta love the short life spans of some of the characters who pop up haha “so and so became leader of wherever, but he was assassinated, so his brother became king but he too was assassinated, and was succeeded by might-as-well-have-been-already assassinated son” 😂 oh the Medieval Ages
Flying daggers were one of the main causes of death in 12th and 13th century.
It was to emphasize how incompetent the Angelos clan were. All of their enemies were in political turmoil and instead of using that to gain ground, they robbed the common people and paid off the foreigners (All while being able to recruit a perfectly capable army).
Real life is stranger than fiction
Seeing the word “characters” be applied to people who actually existed is the weirdest fucking thing i’ve ever seen.
This was the real fall of the Roman empire.
Debatable... Because those people spoke and wrote in greek language. The real last roman was the emperor Justinian.
@@xavierrealmadrid7420 real last emperor were Theodosius I actually
I mean unified empire
@marcon Same thing, Eastern Roman or Byzantine refers to the same politcal entity. Byzantine is a modern historical term meant to differentiate between the classical period (~753 BC to ~476 AD) and the post classical period (~476 AD - 1453 AD). Some people will debate that the fall of the Roman empire or civilization was in 1204 or 1453 AD.
@@xavierrealmadrid7420 so, they adapt with times, it was the Roman empire, the same entity that was once a kingdom, a republic and a empire
@@drakehashimoto685 I go for 1453,since after the 4 crusade, the Roman empire still existed, only it was broken between many realms that were independent, but all became independent once Constantinople fell
A true tragedy, the famous library and other treasures of antiquity and middle ages were lost during the sack of constantinople, the eastern roman empire never recovered after the latin rule
They deserved the sack, granted the leadership and quarrels.
@@CiubyX true
I think this event was awesome and the crusaders did the right thing
They had a brief Golden Age with the Paleologian Dynasty tho when they recaptured Constantinoplein 1261. So yeah in a way until at least 1340s the did fairly at least recovered.
@sebâstian turnayev what's that mean bro?
26:56 Legend Says that The Varangian Guard are still not Paid till this very day.
Thanks for the Likes Ladies 10 is Like a Million for me ❤💖
@sebâstian turnayev hmm which one
How many sieges did you have?
*Constantinople: Yes
it is sad that so many artifacts, lives work and 873 years of pride begone because some idiot could't do his job to whack the kid.
They deserve it
For real. Without Alexios IV the sack might never happen, but still, I think the empire is still doomed anyway. Alexios III is equally a corrupt bastard that'll most likely make the empire collapse from the inside.
@@comradekenobi6908 much of today turks had Byzantine “blood"
Byzanines blood was degenerated by that time it was time to die !
The Angelos dynasty were a curse for the Empire. Hadnt that family ruled Byzantium, it may have survived till today and forever changed the fate of my country, Greece and the history of West as we know it.
Totally, those guys were an absolute nightmarish disaster! The Komnenos dynasty emperors were almost magically impressive, but the Angelos emperors were like lunatics, who smashed everything to pieces.
@@martinusv7433 Exactly!
And all this crap began with Andronicus, who in his youth raided Roman villages as part of Muslim gangs, and after becoming emperor, he raped random women
Well, the Angeloi became a thing because Andronicus I, the last of the Komnenian emperor was a complete nutjob.
Although it doesn't excuse the Angelids for being terrible emperors, but it's worth noting that the latter Komnenians were partly responsible.
Alexios III and Alexios IV are kinda tied when it comes to worst Eastern Roman emperors, but Alexios III came out to be more abhorrent because he blinded his own brother for the throne, and was the reason why Alexios IV did what he did. On top of that, Alexios III was the only one out of the emperors of the Fourth Crusade who got away pretty much scot-free (Alexios IV was strangled to death by order of Alexios V, Isaac II who was by that time a frail old bloke died due to mistreatment by Alexios V, and Alexios V was blinded by the b*stard Alexios III and executed by the Latins for the murder of Alexios IV by being thrown off the Column of Theodosius).
This disagreement became a brawl. The brawl became a riot, and the RIOT...
became a revolution!
And it’s a full scale one
Became suffering.
Hippity hoppity Constantinople is now looted
@@comradekenobi6908 Oi ya git!
Dandolo, over 90 and blind, but still plotting and leading his men in battle. What a man.
In Venice you can still find many artifacts from the sack, including the famous statues of the horses at Saint Mark Cathedral.
Ironic. A blind man humbled Constantinople. And the Romans thought that a blind man is useless as a ruler.
DANDOLO VULT!
As much as I hate this day thank you for updating!
I agree
Very dark day indeed. That was the day Rome's fate was sealed.
This day was indeed sad, but not really the last chance Rome had. Even though it would be hard to make a real comeback.
@sebâstian turnayev empires in anatolia or Turkic empires?
@sebâstian turnayev I don’t know much about Turkic empires, but let me try.
Seljuk empire
Khazar khanate
Ghasnavids
Ottoman Empire
Uyghur khanate
I sense the battle of Adrianople coming in the next episode!!!
Excellent deduction skills!
Kaloyan, the Roman slayer....
@@KingsandGenerals I really hope you can be more in depth for the battle of adrianople 378 AD. Simon macdowall presents a very detailed account of the battle of adrianople and debunks common myths. Especially the strength of the army at the battle was not as high as expected.
It wasn’t a circle of wagon forts either. It was more of a line of wagons. We must take into account there were large communities in the gothic camp. To make a large wagon fort would stretch it too wide to have a circle. The goths most likely place their troops ahead of the fort then pulled back behind the wagons.
Valens shouldn’t be as incompetent as tends to be emphasized on the narrative. He was arian christian which makes sense that it was easy to blame him for the defeat.
Gratian also didn’t have a large force as one might assume. His force traveled down the danube with boats. Which implied it was a tiny force instead of a large one. He also delays reinforcements for months due to an attack on the rhine the moment he pulls his forces from the rhine the lentienses tribe attacked taking heavy casualties. He also stops at sirmium for 4 days due to fever then gets ambushed by alan forced at the camp of mars. I think it was a sound decision to offer battle to the goths as they keep getting reinforcements on the danube by alan and hunnic contingents. The longer valens waited, the more bigger the enemy force grows.
@@althesian9741 Not that battle.
It was battle of adrianople between Kaloyan, Bulgarian emperor and the newly founded Latin empire.
@@rudman97 perhaps a future remake then.
Imagine all that was in that city, and books as in the library of Alexandria
@@Iason29 that reply makes no sense
@@Iason29 You dont know what you re talking about. Totally clueless.
We can only imagine given that we have no source on the pound numbers in Constantinople
Seems very few understood what I'm saying, alright fine I'll explain. The works of the ancients which were found as copies in both the library of Alexandria , Constantinople and some others I think, contained the most advanced knowledge of humanity and philosophy. Any culture that possessed them was to be expected to be highly cultured and morally intelligent people. Indeed in ancient Rome they were very into all the works of most famous greek scholars and this is why often the elite class of Rome spoke mostly ancient greek. Does the behavior of the Byzantines depicted in this video reflect any resemblance to an advanced and highly cultured people or even resemble in any way their roman ancestors?
Even after a century people would watch your videos for a concise overview of major historical events !! Your voice will live forever ! This channel is epic
I'm still eagerly waiting for the remake of the arab siege of constantinople, I hope it doesn't take long
No.... I think it will be the retaking of Constantinople by Nicean Palaiologos dynasty.
This series must have to end with 1453.
@sebâstian turnayev Istanbul 😂
@@yasmineelboubsi6038 The Umayyads sieged Constantinople twice, actually.
@@yasmineelboubsi6038 the Arabs tried to seige it many times but they lost, until Mehmed the conquerer took over it. BTW ottomans doesn't consist of turks only there was Arabs in the army.
@sebâstian turnayev ottomans seljuks gökturks transoxania karamanbeylik. Those should be the most historic turkic nations
this paved the way for the fall of the city to the ottomans
this was 200 years before the ottomans Lmao
@@Reddit_shorts_525 to be honest the did have a brief but a good Golden Age with the Palaiologean Dynasty. I really don't like when people forget about this era and just go straight to the capturing of the city and the entire empire by the Ottomans. Yes the Palaiologeans were not Justinian,Macedonian or Komnenos Dynasty level of "good times" but the empire after the recapture of Constantinople by them was fairly stable and good up until the 1340s that is.
And the Massacre of the Latins paved the way for this.
@@arethmaran1279 Like the philosopher Timberlake once said " What Goes Around... Comes Around "
Actually no it didn't. Ottoman conquest happened due to other factors such as massive Cannon and going around the chains.
Ottoman did siege Constantinople before Sultan Fatih so no crusader sack didn't help.
Finally some new videos!! I've been rewatching the entire series so much I can quote it
Always nice to have new Kings & Generals video to watch in weekend
"The discord in the army was at an all time high"
Glad a few were still loyal to Teamspeak.
Love the fact you're dedicating a whole video to the aftermath. This was definitely one of the most pivotal events of history -- by virtue of not the battle itself, but the unintended side-effects.
Perfect video. I love the way you describe the historical events. Continue to keep us informed.
Great vid, can't wait for the next one
An onion hat guy appears afterwards and says:
A chance for Osman, captain of Oghuz, to show his quality
Ottomans made the best out of it.
They "caught fish in the murky water".
Seljuks, Byzantines and Crusaders had weakened each other.
And it was not Ertugrul or, Osman/Ottoman of Kayi, many other tribes also declared independence from a weakened seljuk (due to Mongol invasion).
A just reference my liege
Just love this channel, as soon as I hear the narration, which is engaging, well informed, exciting, and measured, along with the most excellent graphics, I know that 29 minutes will seem like 5 minutes. Top draw, as always
Thank you for the lovely comment!
@@KingsandGenerals My pleasure, I work a bit with graphics for a London University, and know how important it is to maintain interest, which you do with out fail every time on all of your videos
@@KingsandGenerals Also, your artwork/graphics are fantastic, there is an artist called Angus McBride, who does some spectacular artwork (albeit mainly European) who you should check out. Captures key atypical scenes in history with such brilliance.
Thanks, imy waiting for the next episode 🥰
Your videos are addictive, somehow very accurate, can't complain.
Crusader history, one of the my favorite series :)
This was the real fall of Roman Empire, not 1453.
Awesome video K&Gs. Love your channel and love to learn about history. Much love and God bless you all
Let's go 2 Mill, Congrats Kings and Generals🎉❤
*How come the crusaders of the fourth crusade were able to sack Constantinople but the Muslims couldn’t until 1453?*
The Crusaders were able to sack Constantinople for 3 reasons:
They had alliances with parties inside the city
They were allowed to approach the city unopposed
They got a little lucky
Basically, they didn't take an armed and opposing city in 1204, they slipped in through the cracks of a civil war, and engaged in more than a bit of backstabbing.
The Muslims never had this relative advantage. They always faced a united defense, that had an existential edge of desperation granted by religious fervor, and was backed by a generally hostile hinterland.
It's also vital to recognize the relative importance of naval power. In both 1204 and 1453 the Byzantines raised their chain boom, but in 1204 it was largely undefended, while in 1453 it was so robustly defended that the Turks had to move ships overland to get inside of it.
Actually the city was much better prepared vs. a siege and much better defended in 1204 than it was in 1453. In 1453 the siegers outnumbered the defenders 8 to 1 and succeeded only thanks to the artillery, in 1204 they were evenly matched and without artillery. Simply the Venetians were the best in siege warfare.
@@neutronalchemist3241
If U watch this video then you’ll realise that you’re wrong cause in 1204 the Byzantium had no navy at all and therefore the Venetians took off the chains easily !
However, in 1453 the Byzantium had much stronger navy and they were also using artillery against the ottoman ( back in 1204 no one had artillery but in 1453 both had
@@kingmaverick3140 If you watch the video you'll realize that you are wrong. in 1204 Byzantium HAD a navvy, even if a weak one. In 1453 Byzantium had NO navy. The 1453 "navy" had been a bunch of transport civilian ships that voluntereed. Simply they were commanded by much more effective Venetians and Genoese commanders. In 1204 Byzantium HAD an army. In 1453 it only had a citizen's militia and some international volunteer (mainly Genoese and Venetians again). In 1204 attackers and defenders were evenly matched. In 1453 the attackers outnumbered the defenders 8 to 1 and had MUCH more artillery and of MUCH bigger calibre vs. walls that were not build to withstand artillery.
Simply the Venetians were THE BEST in siege warfare.
@@neutronalchemist3241 In 1204 it was only Byzantium against the west while in 1453 it was the entire west and Byzantium against a young Turk Empire so you’re just living in fantasies
@@kingmaverick3140 LOL! What kind of bullshit is sold for history in your country? All of you buy it so esily or someone cares to ckeck facts?
In 1204 was THE BYZANTINE EMPIRE vs. the crusaders. In 1453 was a small depopulated city and some volunteer vs the Ottoman Empire.
Thousands of channels on youtube and this channel is the best not only informative but it's everything a person interested in military tactics and battlefield breakdowns could literally every ask for. Thank you so much for all you do, and thank you for all the thanks you haven't gotten. You have a life long watcher and fan with me and I look forward to enjoying your content for as long as you continue to do it.
We really appriciate your support and kind words!
Great content and quite prolific! Great work 👍🏻
Thank you!
By far the best channel on TH-cam
Justinian is rolling in his coffin
Most of the imperial sarcophagus and the remains of the emperors and empresses inside were destroyed and scattered by the crusaders during the sack of 1204 in order for them to take the jewelries inside because the new emperor Alexios didnt have the money to pay their armies as he promised he will
In short there isnt any coffin for Justinian to roll in
@sebâstian turnayev Safavid where Iranians and Azeries, Seljuks orghuz, Ottomans, turkish, and Timurids, from the hordes, so probably Usbek altought i am not so sure. But maybe all are true.
Good thing that Enrico Dandolo's corpse was said to have been thrown to the dogs after the siege of 1453 then. Poetic justice I suppose.
@@paulmayson3129 That "barbarians" built the strongest empires at the time.
@@paulmayson3129 Timurids,Seljuqs,Ottomans. These are just few of them.
This crusade makes me sick.. The lack of leadership in this crusade speaks to the level of internal strife during this chaotic point in Europe.
The crusader did show that even with all this trouble they are very capable
Imagine if they have a good leadership and more people
@@anasevi9456 The Venetians in the Venetian quarter were predatory so obviously the reaction wasn't completely unsolicited....
@@anasevi9456 what did Latins think was going to happen when they attacked Greeks within a Greek city? Are really trying to say the Latins were reasonable when the crusaders against french cathars was beginning? What about zara? It was a catholic city ruled by catholics why did the crusaders attack it then
Lack of leadership? Enrico Dandolo led this from the vanguard. Tf you talking about?
@@Beef_3E No. They didn't reach the Holy Land because the fourth crusade is not a crusade in everything but name. The fourth crusade was basically a mercenary army who fought for Venice. Venice achieved their objective. They made themselves the biggest economy on the Mediterranean and basically destroyed Byzantium. The crusaders got mad rich and the ones who stayed got lands and titles for themselves. It was a total success.
And the fact that you mention the holy land shows you don't know much about it. Here is a fun fact: the main target wasn't the holy land. It was Egypt.
Wow, that's really weird.
I was about to do a project about the fourth crusade, then you uploaded it.
Thanks👍
Wow I was at the edge of my seat the whole video thank you for the video.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Please make a video about the eigthy years war and the Saxon wars.
The 1204 sack of Constantinople was a watershed moment of history. It resulted in the end of the Byzantine Empire and they couldn't recover from this disaster. This video was beautifully made and it showed how much damage this event caused to the history of the Byzantine Empire. I am super excited about the discord channel I joined it today so I may be a little behind lol, however history is my favorite subject and I love learning it!
Thank you so much for the kind words and we look forward to seing you in the discord!
Another great Episode
GREAT VIDEOS!! GREAT CONTENT!!
Great Video!!!!
Glad you enjoyed it
SO YOU TELLING ME YOU ENJOYING THE DESTRUCTION OF CONSTANTINOUPOLI
@@TEO14444 REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
@@TEO14444 I mean the content of the video
I love your videos, very much. Great entertainment and historically accurate. They keep my attention, are very well presented and researched wonderfully! Thank you!
Great video!
Been waiting for this for years seems like it
I was not prepared to cry at 9:20am
My Day is ruined. Thanks a lot.
Are you greek?)
@@nole1318 my day was ruined too. I am greek
@sebâstian turnayev all of them are true
@sebâstian turnayev That is true.
@sebâstian turnayev Azeris are not real ethnic group the name is pretty recent , Timurid were mongol but their people were mostly Turkic later called themselves uzbek , Seljuks were way before all of them ... they pretty much started turkick domination in the middle east and anatolia
You guys really know how to make me cry
Absolutely, Kings and Generals is the best TH-cam channel. We want more Turkish subtitles :)
Didn't Kings and generals already have a sack of Constantinople?
yes
@@saint_matthias yea that good but we could get a new video on a new topic or at least the continuation of the fourth Crusade and the next one
@@saint_matthias yes I said it's good🙄
@@nadershah5196 this is good one
@sebâstian turnayev Empires: Ghaznavid, Seljuk, Gokturk, Khazar , and Ottamans.
Nations: Turkey, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Kyrgyzstan. There u go.
Crusaders: we are warriors of Christianity.
Also crusaders: *sacks a Christian city*
I mean they really need cash to fight the Ayyubids so maybe God would forgive sacking a Christian city or too.
But in all seriousness the Crusaders likely didn't care much because they kinda hated the Byzantines anyway.
@@sugadaddy7050 not really, the Byzantines would have fell either way, if not by the Crusaders, any Catholic kingdom or another Turkish invasion simply because they are just hated by everyone even Georgia a fellow Eastern Orthodox Christian Kingdom(Not the American state) wants a piece of the Byzantines at one point and after the 4th Crusade literally namely Trebizond. (which is a Puppet state under the Georgians)
@@sugadaddy7050 true in our timeline but had it not occured still wouldn't be perfect for them, that would be interesting if the Ottomans vassilize them as that would some what preserve some of its culture in a manner similar how the Timurids is a combination of Islamic and Mongolian Culture. (though in my opinion it just too much of a Political win to just annex them but the Ottomans like doing both so who knows.)
@sebâstian turnayev
1. Persians or Indigenous Iranians
2. Yes
3.True/Quiniq branch
4. Persian-Turko-Mongolic
@@spiritusIRATUS no just no thats like saying that Catholics still denounce Protestants as heretics when those days have already gone by
i see a video from kings and generals, i click, simple.
a fan from Arabia, keep it coming dear, may your channel grow ever bigger
Hi Kings and Generals.! You are doing extraordinary work and I have learnt a lot about many historical events through your channel.
Can you please make a video on Gandhara civilization when possible..?
It pains me that my favorite Empire became so corrupted that it became a shadow of its past...
Oh I feel sad for Constantinople, the Pearl of the Roman Empire!!!
its the way of empires. its literally how all empires collapse
This pearl was already rotten in the inside.
OH PLEASE DONT REMIND ME OF THE PAIN
It helps a lot when you guys include a date in the title of your videos
Thank you , K&G .
Our pleasure!
Meanwhile, far in the east, a man named Temujin was in the final stages of uniting the nomads :/
*Throat singing in the horizon*
Lol
Important episode was missed. A "guy" called Kaloyan offered his help to the crusaders, but they abandoned his offer humiliating him in the answer. Later they regretted this decision.
This was great!
Great video today keep it up your doing amazing job
Thank you! Will do!
The day I’ve been waiting for …
Kings and Generals covering the Damned 4th Crusade!
Long time waiting for this. On Independance Day no less. Thanks Boys
You are very welcome
@@KingsandGenerals please make a video about the islamisation of Bangladesh.
@@Nabil-js5xu And the Islamisation of the Dagestani tribes
@@JUUJJII are you from Dagestan?
"There never was a greater crime against humanity than the Fourth Crusade" - Sir Steven Runciman
Best explananation ever. Much better and detailed explanation than wikipedia!!!!
great job ! 😍
Glad you like it!
Just here to say I appreciate you guys for making these insane videos that are far superior to dam near everyone and definitely the ancient aliens channel
We really appriciate it!
If the Byzantines only had Greek Fire...
The Latins called it Greek fire (Ignis Graeca), whence it entered English language as Greek fire. The Romans themselves and their foes the Arabs called it Roman fire from the phrases Roman fire (Ρωμαϊκόν Πυρ), sea fire (Θαλασσινόν Πυρ) and liquid fire (Υγρόν Πυρ). Sadly, the recipe was kept hidden so well that it was lost by its own users.
@@user-bl2bb5yo9c Actually the Venetians knew the recipe, and used it several times, the last one vs. the Norman fleet in 1081. They abandoned its use because it needed specialised ships to be effective. Ramming tactics with galleys were more adaptable.
Althought i want to cry very nice video
Great video
I was wondering the whole episode how the crusaders will deal with formidable varangian guards.
Then they deserted :(
The true face of crusades !
It was not about holy land
or for the sake of God but
was always about personal interests !
Smart move by them
@@sugadaddy7050
I can only agree with you 😂
Everyone will beat U from
the unexpected direction
@@ramsaroj4409
Don’t trust anyone
Most war are
@@kingmaverick3140 That's what learn from history Romans should have stayed in Italy
Fantastic video gents. I particularly like the spinning Emperor, as everyone deserted him.
I love your hard work and great information letting me see history I knew nothing about .
I can't believe I'm saying this, but Dandolo actually sounds like a badass to be able to rally a quarter of his people to a crusade and despite being a blind 93 years old, he's one of the first to charge into battle.
yeah he also was the first to embark the ship, holy fuck chill 91 year old blind dude.
There are only two possibilities: 1) either he was suffering from a severe mental illness or 2) the story is false/embellished.
@@rehan3600 there is a chance that when you are that old you kinda wanna go out with a bang.
@@rehan3600 Usually Kings and Generals will not shy away if they know the source is questionable or exaggerated, unless there's no proof of it.
Though, I wouldn't push the "mental illness" theory to the side, he did sack a Christian city...
Dandolo is like Baron Harkonnen, and Venice to the Eastern Roman Empire is like the Harkonnens to the Byzantine Atreides.
Some interesting info:
Bulgaria never actually became catholic. It entered a union with the Catholic Church known in Bulgarian as “uniya”. As this was purely a politic move to gain more legitimacy by Kaloyan church practices never changed and remained orthodox.
A side note, I noticed that in 15:20 Philipopolis is shown as being part of Bulgaria although Kaloyan actually took it after the sack of Constantinople and the subsequent battle and siege of Adrianople in 1205. Stanimaka on the other hand was indeed in Bulgarian hands.
There was also more fighting between the Byzantines and Bulgarians during the reign of Alexios III, but this was obviously not shown as it is not the main topic of the video.
Something I really love about the European Middle Ages looking back, is that there is always something happening. Not that nothing happened in other periods but the Middle Ages here in Europe but this level of chaos and the large impacts it has is just particularly great to me personally.
You made me cry today
What happened next?! Thank you very much for your vids and content. Absolutely amazing.
Stay tuned to find out
make series about the restoration of the restoration of the byzantine empire from 1204 to 1261
This part of history always makes me sad... Constantinople never fully recovered to it's glory after that
I know it is only history docomentry but watching your videos always feels like being in Some kind of a trip
Great video for the byzantine empire always. Next time you should do a video about the comnenian dynasty