What do you mean? Goulds piano was tuned at a = 432 ? Is that why it sounds so different? God, i always tought it was a tone of the piano by making it sound like a pianoforte
Comparing all the preludes in the English Suite, I think the fifth prelude is the best written. Some people try to point out the recordings by Landowska and Kirkpatrick as examples of great performances of the past. It is possible to find many merits and charms in them. However, her performance does not give sufficient praise to the ability of Bach's composers. His performance also hides his ability on the harpsichord. In particular, I am very dissatisfied with the fact that neither of them are able to fully express the interesting rhythms of Bach's works. I do not intend to look for the time to listen to those recordings. Gould's performance brings out a considerable part of the brilliance of his compositional technique and the interesting rhythms. Gould's discoveries are utilized in the performances and recordings of today's pianists, regardless of who they are. I cannot help but hear it that way in my ears.
00:00 - I.Prelude
4:43 - II.Allemande
7:41 - III.Courante
9:32 - IV.Sarabande
11:32 - VI.Passepied
14:15 - VII.Gigue
Absolutely sublime. Gould at his best. The difference with 432 is truly noticeable too. Thanks for the upload!
What do you mean?
Goulds piano was tuned at a = 432 ? Is that why it sounds so different?
God, i always tought it was a tone of the piano by making it sound like a pianoforte
I will always be thankful to this heavenly creature that plays for me with this clarity Bach.......
Thanks a lot for uploading this most unique interpretation by Gould and for choosing his performance on a piano with the Baroque tuning,
The prelude is amazing...
I agree. It is relentless, motoric like a locomotive named "The Gould" pushing aside all mediocrity with its cowcatcher.
Such a nice music sharing
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Comparing all the preludes in the English Suite, I think the fifth prelude is the best written.
Some people try to point out the recordings by Landowska and Kirkpatrick as examples of great performances of the past. It is possible to find many merits and charms in them. However, her performance does not give sufficient praise to the ability of Bach's composers. His performance also hides his ability on the harpsichord. In particular, I am very dissatisfied with the fact that neither of them are able to fully express the interesting rhythms of Bach's works. I do not intend to look for the time to listen to those recordings.
Gould's performance brings out a considerable part of the brilliance of his compositional technique and the interesting rhythms. Gould's discoveries are utilized in the performances and recordings of today's pianists, regardless of who they are. I cannot help but hear it that way in my ears.
突然、一番好きな Gould English suite no.4 が聞けなくなってしまった。ショック、残念。ｰｰｰｰｰ
Gli abbellimenti del preludio sono solo per gente aliena.😂 glen, i cervelli di due persone con un braccio solo, riunite in una.😂
je n'écoute pas Bach ... j'écoute Gould
12/13
Oui mais c'est grâce à Bach que Gould a eu du succès.
Bro why 432. Its only a full myth