LIVE 🥊 Beterbiev vs. Bivol 2: The Last Crescendo | Press Conference

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @CarlCampbellMusic
    @CarlCampbellMusic 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    58:08 😂

  • @thairanc
    @thairanc 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Winner predictions:
    Beterbiev
    Sheeraz
    Shakur
    Madrimov
    Dubois
    Buatsi
    Kabayel

    • @ravenaussie3760
      @ravenaussie3760 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My predictions:
      Bivol.
      Sheeraz.
      Shakur.
      Madrimov.
      Dubois.
      Smith.
      Kabayel.

    • @thairanc
      @thairanc 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ fair enough. Close fights all the way through besides Shakurs fight.

  • @umarsh.5703
    @umarsh.5703 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Артур Бетербиев чемпион 🥇👍

  • @johnyerkov1553
    @johnyerkov1553 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Betebiev too strong

  • @redl1ght1
    @redl1ght1 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Parker will give Dubois problems

  • @morgansenior9945
    @morgansenior9945 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Lennox Lewis was the undisputed champion yes, but he wasn’t the peoples champion

  • @ezícmiglá
    @ezícmiglá 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i hope parker wins

  • @fuuf7092
    @fuuf7092 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    wake up! they had to add the trinity later
    Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,

    • @fuuf7092
      @fuuf7092 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      the comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
      Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
      The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
      “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,

    • @fuuf7092
      @fuuf7092 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
      “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
      The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
      “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”