I’ve been active on TH-cam for 13 years and never felt compelled to comment on a single video. But a video with Chair Khan warrants my first ever comment. Attracting people like this young woman is what the framers of our modern democracy had in mind when they designed government institutions. Sharp intellect, acts fearlessly for the public good, morally incorruptible, compelling mission, dedicated, consistent and operating with a philosophical frame that is grounded in truth and data. You have to be a truly blinded ideologue to hate her work! In a world driven by the cynical worship of money, Lina is a rare shinning light. It gives me hope that the next generation of leaders may not all be lost in the sea of bullshit culture wars. Some young people can see clearly and refuse to act against their own interest in service of the corporate oligarchs
She is the exception to the rule that most highly intelligent, highly driven people are amoral and therefore in the private sector making absolute bank. Sad but true.
This is a great one to comment on, and I couldn't agree more with your point of view. She's SHOCKINGLY good at what she does. I think there are many other "almost as good" public servants out there keeping things on an even keel in spite of an increasingly complex world and in spite of having much of Congress taken over by a cult of personality. Hoping to see more of your comments!!
The founder's heads would explode if you told them that a non white woman would be in a position of power. Other than that, I completely agree with your comment.
WOW, the woman is the smartest communicator of complex ideas and issues, it's comforting to see that there's still people in government who recognize talent when they see it, and people like Lina who are willing to step into the breach and serve in a thankless and lower paying job than she would be able to snag in the private sector. She's invaluable to the country.
I don’t know if it’s her or the fact I’m turning 40 this year but Lina Khan is the first time I’ve been this enthusiastic about a bureaucratic government administrator. I haven’t seen the government make this many pro-competitive, pro-consumer moves in a long time.
Agreed. It's almost odd how she's allowed to do this without being culled. I'm assuming they failed at trying to buying her allegiance. Real regulators are like her-cutting the chaff by outing bums and crooks. Now, if we had someone as effective as her to work internally and whip the bureaucracy into shape (and out of corruption), we might have the best of both worlds.
Lina Kahn is kicking ass and fighting the mega companies on behalf of the smaller ones and consumers. She is the right person for her position at the right time. I hope she can stay as the head for a very long time. Go Lina!
Lina Khan is a national treasure; old money and new money is afraid of her because she’s bring balance to this crazy country. From making inhalers to going after price gouging this woman needs to get the medal of freedom 🙌🏾
Would love to have her as Chair for another 8 years. The work her and her team are doing at the FTC is so great for US innovation long term, as well as overall market health, and consumer protections.
Absolutely loved the segment with Lina Kahn. I think she has a great perspective on markets and the role of government in them. Great questions that teased out great insights! 👍
Lina Khan and her team are the best. Our economy has been captured and rent-seeked to death. To make up for the last 50 years, we will need decades of leadership like hers to rebalance the whole system.
What a gorgeously intelligent mind! OMG I can't get enough of her opinions as they're honest/informed. While I'm listening I'm overwhelmed by the amount of ads on youtube(some are built in and I accept those) from our politicians right now in the election cycle - stark difference between their counter-productive, disgusting and ORANGE stance and hers. God I wish I was better looking and rich and could be in her orbit! ;) just kiddin but you take my point - Lina RULES!
Fernando Llamas? Revenge Of Khan? Try Wrath Of Kahn and Ricardo Montalban. Did you purposefully put that in there to see how many people listened to the whole podcast? Good show, Khan is smart and on the job. Hope she survives the Orange Creeper.
OK, the bad tiger in jungle book was Sher Khan, which is what makes the name sound so badass. The Khan in the Star Trek movies was Ricardo Montauban (yes, Mr Rourke from Fantasy Island), not Fernando Lamas.
Inflation happened because of the huge expansion of the monetary base. Everything else is secular and not material in the discussion on inflation. The CPI lags the monetary base perfectly in this inflation cycle. Rates didn't control inflation by itself, it was the monetary base anchor that did most of the heavy lifting.
I think we need a very vocal retraction next week to quell the growing Fernando Lamas/Ricardo Montalban controversy that is absolutely shutting down Twitter ATM...
Antitrust vs Entryism - To me they’re the same but entryism is rarely discussed: this is where corporations openly discriminate against older workers because of the perverse oligopoly that is the health insurance industry. Entryism is also companies not hiring based upon political affiliation that they’ve used a workaround utilizing “culture” as the euphemism to avoid accountability. I also believe that R vs K selection theory in biology illustrates how it’s difficult and sometimes impossible to have everyone magically “coexist bro!” When each side have often competed and opposite motives that can result in either gross inefficiencies ( we all know the company that has a meeting about why they have too many meetings ) vs the company that would sell its own citizens to serfdom on the road to total information awareness maximum efficiency. Essentially the one thing missing from BOTH sides is the human or ontological impact - this - humans are actually the “inefficiency” that the transhumanist sociopaths like larry fink theil and e lawn and larger macro figures like schwab and harrari wish to get rid of. So in the end - I believe if you remove all of the scapegoats around the fake existential crisis of environment and “duh climate dude bro” and “the cervesa sickness bro!” = the end goal of “Stakeholders” who ARE in reality attempting to replace government under the guise of “efficiency maaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!” And that’s where RFK and E-Lawn come in. Essentially when you boil it down: they don’t care if they destroy the demand side (humans) as they want population reduction and as long as they’re in the Club of “stakeholders” the economics affecting the working class don’t actually matter to them. The only thing is that they don’t want the natural resources destroyed as they slowly force people into 15 minute digital prisons. Essentially what Larry Fink ELawn Ramaswammy and others wish for is a slow degrowth strategy utilizing both lockstep and “clever together” and that’s why they’ve borrowed from Mao, Stalin, and other past regimes including present methods by China With surveillance = population control. Am I wrong? To me this is the bottom line - I just think that people let their “muh emotionz bro!” get in the way of actually understanding and accepting the greater longterm goals of the Malthusian death cult.
The first question about inflation is already a bust for me. Inflation's only cause is more money supply. Supply/demand imbalance that keeps generating inflation each year is directly caused by deficit driven growth. For Covid, when there was a supply shock, and prices wereup because of scarcity, price would have gonedown if no one was buying at those prices. But people were still buying because virtually all western governments borrowed printed money and gave it away under aid/stimulus packages. Demand stayed high and sustained the high prices of the supply shock.
Lina Khan is good for business. She is just not good for those who wish to crush market dynamics and squeeze consumers. Splitting up large tech companies would create competitive value and ultimately improve the economy.
Any move from FTC this century on food, healthcare and telecom to break up (!!!) the monopolies that cost consumers double digit percentage of their income every month? or is Google still the most monopolistic company in US that offers consumers its products for FREE ?
VC world has nowhere to sell without M&A and it crushed startup market … sortoff. What do you guys think about that? Maybe massive megaanimals like big corps are the best buyers and drivers of innovation. Or? Im probably stupid so checking what you think.
Don't understand the OpenAI hype. Their first to market tech's biggest competitor isn't Anthropic, or Google, or Apple- its the open source code like that released by Meta that eats its lunch on benchmarks _and_ efficiency. You can get gpt4o level answers out of 4 gpus running in a homelab- the technology moat is completely non-existent. Sam Altman is the best fundraiser in the world (maybe second only to Musk) but if OpenAI ever needs to run on its ability to efficiently deliver value to customers instead of VC bucks and dreams, it'll be pushed aside by clever kids and free off the shelf alternatives (that can be fine tuned to specific business use cases).
@@jannichi6431 I think you missed my point, the airlines like so many other companies have so many common shareholders that they don’t engage in price competition anymore airlines case that would’ve been fair wars I don’t think I’ve seen one of those in 20 years. and how does the FTC deal with the fact that some companies have common minority but still large stake shareholders who can strain competition in the name of profit?
I thought the recall on Newsom was trash at the moment too, now I wish I voted to recall him. He’s gotta go. California is becoming pro business again to some degree but I’m sick of this regime. And I don’t have anything against Lina Khan as a person, but I’m vehemently against people going straight from academia to being the head of the FTC who have zero industry experience. She’s all theory and it doesn’t work imo. She focuses on all the wrong things IMO.
Thinking that the repeated recall attempts weren’t trash and Lena Khan isn’t addressing a serious anti-trust issue that we addressed over a century ago is actual brain rot. 😂
@@nicfirebear what has she actually addressed though? She’s lost every law suit and effectively just froze the M&A market. Doing things implies outcomes were achieved. Now she’s likely about to be out of a job regardless of the admin because she was awesome at it?
@@nicfirebear and I am saying the recall attempts were trash…..there weren’t any good alternative candidates which is really where they fucked up in my opinion because i was open to voting for someone else but the files looked like a clown car.
@@LuisCContreras More about things she isn't focusing on bc she's too weak; health care costs are 90% higher than real costs, Meta is lying incessantly about privacy while profiting billions off of every person addicted to theit shit, Apple is purposely making batteries that lose half their strength within a year leading to eccesive swap outs or better yet, purchasing of the latest 2% improved pos iPhone. Many other items to rail on about.
Is this old? AI is fool’s gold. Stop listening to CEOs and discuss with software engineers. AI is improving but its capabilities are so overblown. Why are you pushing investing in AI as if AI would being fool’s gold will crash the whole market. Just throwing good money after bad.
15:50 wtf? I don’t get the constant attempts to be risky or prove “we don’t give af” ….its corny & not funny or clever. It’s only 1 minute if a show but it’s so strange. & it’s every show. You can tell the Brit doesn’t like it but laughs because that’s his boss.
Gavin Nusom is pulling an Adams: getting paid to have an opinion which he's grateful just to have someone tell him which side to be on. "new model" means completely new main trunc, not a branch or derivative but when key is when you come up with a new name or prefix, where its described as "a novel architecture" or "completely redesigned" in the documentation... If it has different charts, layers, cost functions, if it's a different type like LSTM instead of SVM.. You can leave the model definition vague, at some point it's pretty clear to show whether it's completely different under the same name or if it's the same model iterated on for 10 years. This isn't something that changes frequently, it takes a lot of math and commits to explore one model.
Dude, clearly you're a one trick pony. For all the "supposed" tech expertise you espouse (which any kid at a Stanford program has, it's just info), you clearly lack awareness, context. The man is a GOVERNOR. Of the largest State in the nation. By DEFINITION, Governors, Presidents, Prime ministers main focus is GOVERNANCE, polycymaking, which has its own intricacies. Not technical details of emerging technologies. That's exactly why they have specialists to advise them on technical issues. That's exactly how it should work. Your criticism is either petulant self-promotion as a techie or just dumb lack of understanding of how government works in a democratic society 🤦
If getting self righteous podscaster's gangster designation is commendable with a lazy idealistic approach simply opposing all M&A activity Lina is the perfect FTC chair. Not a single insightful comment other than corporations bad, consumers good. Wasted time I will never get back
It seems like she means well, but when push comes to shove and the big corporations want to be exempt from any new legislation then they will go above her to their senators, congressmen, and federal judges they have on their payroll to avoid anything they don’t want.
What has she achieved? An exodus of colleagues? Lost arguments in court? An inflated response to a single "academic" paper on the evils of Amazon? LMAO.
I’ve been active on TH-cam for 13 years and never felt compelled to comment on a single video. But a video with Chair Khan warrants my first ever comment. Attracting people like this young woman is what the framers of our modern democracy had in mind when they designed government institutions. Sharp intellect, acts fearlessly for the public good, morally incorruptible, compelling mission, dedicated, consistent and operating with a philosophical frame that is grounded in truth and data. You have to be a truly blinded ideologue to hate her work! In a world driven by the cynical worship of money, Lina is a rare shinning light. It gives me hope that the next generation of leaders may not all be lost in the sea of bullshit culture wars. Some young people can see clearly and refuse to act against their own interest in service of the corporate oligarchs
She is the exception to the rule that most highly intelligent, highly driven people are amoral and therefore in the private sector making absolute bank. Sad but true.
@willsenyo ok Lina, we get it 😂🙈
This is a great one to comment on, and I couldn't agree more with your point of view. She's SHOCKINGLY good at what she does. I think there are many other "almost as good" public servants out there keeping things on an even keel in spite of an increasingly complex world and in spite of having much of Congress taken over by a cult of personality. Hoping to see more of your comments!!
@@golfinguru11 so now being smart makes you immoral as a rule? Wtf is happening
The founder's heads would explode if you told them that a non white woman would be in a position of power. Other than that, I completely agree with your comment.
WOW, the woman is the smartest communicator of complex ideas and issues, it's comforting to see that there's still people in government who recognize talent when they see it, and people like Lina who are willing to step into the breach and serve in a thankless and lower paying job than she would be able to snag in the private sector. She's invaluable to the country.
I don’t know if it’s her or the fact I’m turning 40 this year but Lina Khan is the first time I’ve been this enthusiastic about a bureaucratic government administrator. I haven’t seen the government make this many pro-competitive, pro-consumer moves in a long time.
Agreed. It's almost odd how she's allowed to do this without being culled. I'm assuming they failed at trying to buying her allegiance. Real regulators are like her-cutting the chaff by outing bums and crooks. Now, if we had someone as effective as her to work internally and whip the bureaucracy into shape (and out of corruption), we might have the best of both worlds.
Lina Kahn is kicking ass and fighting the mega companies on behalf of the smaller ones and consumers. She is the right person for her position at the right time. I hope she can stay as the head for a very long time. Go Lina!
Lina Khan is a national treasure; old money and new money is afraid of her because she’s bring balance to this crazy country. From making inhalers to going after price gouging this woman needs to get the medal of freedom 🙌🏾
lol she’s getting the boot 🥾 the GOP has no need for her.
Would love to have her as Chair for another 8 years. The work her and her team are doing at the FTC is so great for US innovation long term, as well as overall market health, and consumer protections.
Lina, thank you for the work you do.
Let’s gooooooo I stan Lina Kahn!
Crazy how Scott G is laser focused on her answering..
Lina Khan! Finally!
Love Lina Khan! We need people like these in the government.
Wow. Great interview
Good get, boys, fantastic discussion, Chair Khan rules!
Absolutely loved the segment with Lina Kahn. I think she has a great perspective on markets and the role of government in them. Great questions that teased out great insights! 👍
Lina Khan and her team are the best. Our economy has been captured and rent-seeked to death. To make up for the last 50 years, we will need decades of leadership like hers to rebalance the whole system.
THIS IS MY CELEBRITY CRUSH, GO LINA
Good taste🧠💖
She is awesome
She's a hunt
Lina Khan ftw. The best!!
What a gorgeously intelligent mind! OMG I can't get enough of her opinions as they're honest/informed.
While I'm listening I'm overwhelmed by the amount of ads on youtube(some are built in and I accept those) from our politicians right now in the election cycle - stark difference between their counter-productive, disgusting and ORANGE stance and hers. God I wish I was better looking and rich and could be in her orbit! ;) just kiddin but you take my point - Lina RULES!
US loves Lina, she understands wealth gap.
Screw All In pod
You are right on. The All In Pod billionaire's live in a different Universe. They have no idea how most people live.
Screw you
Lina you are impressive, articulate, well informed. Thanks for your dedication and hard work at FTC.
Fernando Llamas?
Revenge Of Khan?
Try Wrath Of Kahn and Ricardo Montalban.
Did you purposefully put that in there to see how many people listened to the whole podcast?
Good show, Khan is smart and on the job. Hope she survives the Orange Creeper.
Kahn wasn't played by Fernando Lamas. It was Ricardo Montalban, the host of Fantasy Island
heard the same and was like????
As always a wonderful blend of buffoonery and brilliance. Great guests and great questions. Thank you.
Canada desperately needs a Lina Khan
Wow u are dumb dumb
@@stephenharwood4345You obviously have no understanding of the grocery market in Canada. The lack of competition in that sector is abysmal. 38:30
Finally. A banger!!!
Prof G rules.
Can you have this guy on the show?
th-cam.com/video/vIkRbAvaQjs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=88QLkRW_jth8SVYl
What a guest to have
Ricardo Montalban played Khan in the Star Trek movie "The Wrath of Khan".
And he played Khan in the episode "Space Seed" in the original series.
@@stevechance150
Also famous for hawking the Chrysler Cordoba with its soft Corinthian leather.
Two of my favorite people in one video!
Teddy bears and butterflies 🧚🏼♂️🧸 nice pod today tho
Please,.no Ted Dy and Daddy. Texas Senator Alred sounds better.
Great Space X a fav feed. 🛸
Love Khan
Khan❤❤
Prof G, the movie was Wrath of Khan. Khan was played by Ricardo Montaban. And yes it was excellent.
LOL, someone else who listened all the way to the end.
Prof G - Your calling her Shere Khan
A Character from Jungle book
I can’t stop laughing
As always great interview
Chair Khan
@@watson457
The obvious pun, not Revenge Of Khan with Fernando Llamas! LOL
Lina’s been making the rounds, love that she goes full gangster on dog$hit greedy monopolies
u sooooooo stupid
Oh shit! My two favorite people!! Let's fucking go!!!
If only presidential candidates were as articulate and impressive as Chair Khan.
Lina Khan rocks
OK, the bad tiger in jungle book was Sher Khan, which is what makes the name sound so badass. The Khan in the Star Trek movies was Ricardo Montauban (yes, Mr Rourke from Fantasy Island), not Fernando Lamas.
Exactly. 👍 Well-done commenter!
Inflation happened because of the huge expansion of the monetary base. Everything else is secular and not material in the discussion on inflation. The CPI lags the monetary base perfectly in this inflation cycle. Rates didn't control inflation by itself, it was the monetary base anchor that did most of the heavy lifting.
No it's not learn economics
@@ptroy72blue You get a fail if you talk about cost push and demand pull inflation. Read Milton Friedman
Well said Ed on China's faux-numbers! Proud of you for nailing it honestly!
Great interview! Chair Khan is a troublemaker whom I like.
Monopolies never benefit the end consumer neither does it trickle down
Lets see what Scott thinks of Lina after she poaches Ed 😁
Did I miss the title about her suggestions for unlocking *innovation?
She’s very articulate, hope Kamala keeps her if she wins
WHOA!
32:00 noncontrolling interest, it’s from acquisition accounting where there’s nonmajority stock acquired
I think we need a very vocal retraction next week to quell the growing Fernando Lamas/Ricardo Montalban controversy that is absolutely shutting down Twitter ATM...
What an exciting guest!
Lina Khan!!!! Wow that's a good get!!!
Antitrust vs Entryism - To me they’re the same but entryism is rarely discussed: this is where corporations openly discriminate against older workers because of the perverse oligopoly that is the health insurance industry.
Entryism is also companies not hiring based upon political affiliation that they’ve used a workaround utilizing “culture” as the euphemism to avoid accountability.
I also believe that R vs K selection theory in biology illustrates how it’s difficult and sometimes impossible to have everyone magically “coexist bro!” When each side have often competed and opposite motives that can result in either gross inefficiencies ( we all know the company that has a meeting about why they have too many meetings ) vs the company that would sell its own citizens to serfdom on the road to total information awareness maximum efficiency.
Essentially the one thing missing from BOTH sides is the human or ontological impact - this - humans are actually the “inefficiency” that the transhumanist sociopaths like larry fink theil and e lawn and larger macro figures like schwab and harrari wish to get rid of.
So in the end - I believe if you remove all of the scapegoats around the fake existential crisis of environment and “duh climate dude bro” and “the cervesa sickness bro!” = the end goal of
“Stakeholders” who ARE in reality attempting to replace government under the guise of “efficiency maaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!” And that’s where RFK and E-Lawn come in.
Essentially when you boil it down: they don’t care if they destroy the demand side (humans) as they want population reduction and as long as they’re in the Club of “stakeholders” the economics affecting the working class don’t actually matter to them.
The only thing is that they don’t want the natural resources destroyed as they slowly force people into 15 minute digital prisons.
Essentially what Larry Fink ELawn Ramaswammy and others wish for is a slow degrowth strategy utilizing both lockstep and “clever together” and that’s why they’ve borrowed from Mao, Stalin, and other past regimes including present methods by China With surveillance = population control.
Am I wrong?
To me this is the bottom line - I just think that people let their “muh emotionz bro!” get in the way of actually understanding and accepting the greater longterm goals of the Malthusian death cult.
Lina Khan is doing the rounds. Maybe she is worried she is not going to get reappointed no matter who wins.
Duh lol
"Unlocking Innovation Through Antitrust Enforcement"
lol, spoken like a true bureaucrat
The first question about inflation is already a bust for me. Inflation's only cause is more money supply. Supply/demand imbalance that keeps generating inflation each year is directly caused by deficit driven growth. For Covid, when there was a supply shock, and prices wereup because of scarcity, price would have gonedown if no one was buying at those prices. But people were still buying because virtually all western governments borrowed printed money and gave it away under aid/stimulus packages. Demand stayed high and sustained the high prices of the supply shock.
“KHANNNNN!!!!!” Billionaires in America
Lina Khan FTW
Scott, it was NOT Fernando Lamas who played Kahn! It wa Ricardo Maltaban from Fantasy Island fame! Yer welcome.🖖
This lady is just as old as I am. It's safe to say I'm behind.
Am I the only one who thought of the Jungle book when Scott or Ed said "Chair Khan"? 🐯🐅
I luv Khan.
48:42 Well actually Scott, Khan in Star Trek was played be the great actor Ricardo Montalban.
Fernando Lamas < Ricardo Montalban 😂
Lina Khan is good for business. She is just not good for those who wish to crush market dynamics and squeeze consumers. Splitting up large tech companies would create competitive value and ultimately improve the economy.
She is my Superhero. And 35 years old!!!
Reagan won and we all lost except the 1%. Time to reverse course and encourage authentic competition.
Hopefully Lina continues into the next administration.
Sher Khan was the maneating tiger in the Jungle Book.
lol the wrath of khan Scott
Dude! It was the Wrath of Kahn. And it was Ricardo Montalban.
CHAT GPT with Open AI is so far ahead and easier to use than others currently. Just an LLM 4 stage.
Facepalm.... Ricardo Montalban was Khan.
Any move from FTC this century on food, healthcare and telecom to break up (!!!) the monopolies that cost consumers double digit percentage of their income every month? or is Google still the most monopolistic company in US that offers consumers its products for FREE ?
Ed is a brit and has Ket written next to his head for most of the stream. Coincidence or did the dog convince him to try the good stuff? Yeaaaahhhhh
👍👍👍
VC world has nowhere to sell without M&A and it crushed startup market … sortoff. What do you guys think about that?
Maybe massive megaanimals like big corps are the best buyers and drivers of innovation. Or? Im probably stupid so checking what you think.
Another reason to go BLUE!!!
Pretty sure “50” is the new “60” with these guys…. Didn’t he already say he went to college in the 80’s?
Don't understand the OpenAI hype. Their first to market tech's biggest competitor isn't Anthropic, or Google, or Apple- its the open source code like that released by Meta that eats its lunch on benchmarks _and_ efficiency. You can get gpt4o level answers out of 4 gpus running in a homelab- the technology moat is completely non-existent.
Sam Altman is the best fundraiser in the world (maybe second only to Musk) but if OpenAI ever needs to run on its ability to efficiently deliver value to customers instead of VC bucks and dreams, it'll be pushed aside by clever kids and free off the shelf alternatives (that can be fine tuned to specific business use cases).
✨🧸✨ 👶❤️🙏
How does investment for control by the big tech differ from Block Rock owning 10% of everything, take airlines for example.
Great Q on Anti Trust. Black Rock and Palantir won't buy their stock based on principle. 😈
@@jannichi6431 I think you missed my point, the airlines like so many other companies have so many common shareholders that they don’t engage in price competition anymore airlines case that would’ve been fair wars I don’t think I’ve seen one of those in 20 years. and how does the FTC deal with the fact that some companies have common minority but still large stake shareholders who can strain competition in the name of profit?
I thought the recall on Newsom was trash at the moment too, now I wish I voted to recall him. He’s gotta go. California is becoming pro business again to some degree but I’m sick of this regime. And I don’t have anything against Lina Khan as a person, but I’m vehemently against people going straight from academia to being the head of the FTC who have zero industry experience. She’s all theory and it doesn’t work imo. She focuses on all the wrong things IMO.
Name one wrong thing she is focusing on.
Thinking that the repeated recall attempts weren’t trash and Lena Khan isn’t addressing a serious anti-trust issue that we addressed over a century ago is actual brain rot. 😂
@@nicfirebear what has she actually addressed though? She’s lost every law suit and effectively just froze the M&A market. Doing things implies outcomes were achieved. Now she’s likely about to be out of a job regardless of the admin because she was awesome at it?
@@nicfirebear and I am saying the recall attempts were trash…..there weren’t any good alternative candidates which is really where they fucked up in my opinion because i was open to voting for someone else but the files looked like a clown car.
@@LuisCContreras More about things she isn't focusing on bc she's too weak; health care costs are 90% higher than real costs, Meta is lying incessantly about privacy while profiting billions off of every person addicted to theit shit, Apple is purposely making batteries that lose half their strength within a year leading to eccesive swap outs or better yet, purchasing of the latest 2% improved pos iPhone. Many other items to rail on about.
Ricardo Montalban
Is this old? AI is fool’s gold. Stop listening to CEOs and discuss with software engineers. AI is improving but its capabilities are so overblown. Why are you pushing investing in AI as if AI would being fool’s gold will crash the whole market. Just throwing good money after bad.
Kamala’s donors are going to get rid of this lady sadly.
🙌🏾
Softball questions. But I appreciate the effort, no sarcasm.
th-cam.com/video/vIkRbAvaQjs/w-d-xo.htmlsi=88QLkRW_jth8SVYl
Can you have this guy on the show?
14:51 how is xai a shitty ai company if its grok2 model sits at number 4 on the llm leaderboard?
15:50 wtf? I don’t get the constant attempts to be risky or prove “we don’t give af” ….its corny & not funny or clever. It’s only 1 minute if a show but it’s so strange. & it’s every show. You can tell the Brit doesn’t like it but laughs because that’s his boss.
Gavin Nusom is pulling an Adams: getting paid to have an opinion which he's grateful just to have someone tell him which side to be on.
"new model" means completely new main trunc, not a branch or derivative but when key is when you come up with a new name or prefix, where its described as "a novel architecture" or "completely redesigned" in the documentation... If it has different charts, layers, cost functions, if it's a different type like LSTM instead of SVM..
You can leave the model definition vague, at some point it's pretty clear to show whether it's completely different under the same name or if it's the same model iterated on for 10 years. This isn't something that changes frequently, it takes a lot of math and commits to explore one model.
Dude, clearly you're a one trick pony. For all the "supposed" tech expertise you espouse (which any kid at a Stanford program has, it's just info), you clearly lack awareness, context. The man is a GOVERNOR. Of the largest State in the nation. By DEFINITION, Governors, Presidents, Prime ministers main focus is GOVERNANCE, polycymaking, which has its own intricacies. Not technical details of emerging technologies. That's exactly why they have specialists to advise them on technical issues. That's exactly how it should work. Your criticism is either petulant self-promotion as a techie or just dumb lack of understanding of how government works in a democratic society 🤦
Wrath of Khan
If getting self righteous podscaster's gangster designation is commendable with a lazy idealistic approach simply opposing all M&A activity Lina is the perfect FTC chair. Not a single insightful comment other than corporations bad, consumers good. Wasted time I will never get back
Bravo, exactly.
Wtf… guest of the year?
Again blaming 2022 Ukraine’s war for inflation when US cpi was well above 5% in 2021 🙄
Gasp
It seems like she means well, but when push comes to shove and the big corporations want to be exempt from any new legislation then they will go above her to their senators, congressmen, and federal judges they have on their payroll to avoid anything they don’t want.
clown show gaslight interview. clearly does not understand inflation lol.
Suggestion: rather than mispronouncing the word "sans" perhaps you could consider using the word "sine" pronounced "seenay"
What has she achieved? An exodus of colleagues? Lost arguments in court? An inflated response to a single "academic" paper on the evils of Amazon? LMAO.