"Constant Busch" 0:50 probably time to hand your licence in. You deliberately drove into that car. You had plenty of time to take evasive action. Hope your insurance company is going to pull your pants down 😂
0:30, that is so odd, pulls out with a car passing, bad positioning, speeds up when it is obvious someone has pulled out, time to hit horn, then a collision. I hope Insurance made you pay for that.
@@george-ev1dqI think with this video it would be hard to argue 50/50 it was a deliberate ram. He easily had time to stop and chose not to. 50/50 is when you both make a mistake and it's unavailable. This was 100% avoidable. He chose not to and ram the other car.
@@george-ev1dq Criminal intent overrides regular liability. Cammer should pay 100% there unless both insurance companies drop the ball badly. Cammer should also be charged for that.
@@SVEVelsen Fair point, but insurance companies want to screw all parties over to max out their profits, they like to find blame where there is none and they do not operate within the Highway code and RTA, they make the rules up to suit their deep pockets.
As an HGV driver i have seen trucks trying to pass each other and no one easing off to let the other pass. They still havent figured it out that you get no where doing an extra half mile an hour!!! Is embarrassing tp watch
Used to be class one and I can only think that there is no deterrent and very poor training these days. In my day losing your license for minor infringements was a very real possibility but I've seen class one drivers on tv shouting the odds with the police when caught driving illegally; about time the law was enforced.
7:03 looks to me like the other car was already on the roundabout it was up to you to look to your right, and slow down.. it's a roundabout, not a straight road for you..
Totally agree with you. If an accident was caused the cammer would have full responsibility as you have to give way to the right of you. Fiat driver was in the right.
@@TCTeslaTPT2 the opposite car cut across the roundabout, so not really. both in the wrong. if this went to court, it's equally liable. cammer for not slowing and following the roundabout which would increase the distance between them and the opposite car. the opposite car for not going AROUND the roundabout and slowing down in the process, not to mention indicating their intention. again, this would increase the distance between them and the cammer. you can't just use "give way to the right" as a defence.
@@EricSmith-km1jbCompletely agree. The cam car appears to speed up but the oncoming car, in displaying no indication, was in fact indicating to go straight on. Drivers using indicators is getting less and less, nowadays, and it’s a crashingly poor trait.
7:05 really rubbish driving from both cars, the cammer not reading the road and not giving way at the roundabout but also the black car with no indication of where it’s going
3 miles every hour further down the road so 30 miles in a 10 hour day. Not saying that what that muppet was doing in the outside lane was correct but explaining what they gain.
not as stupid as you, if every truck fell in line you would have a wall of trucks on the inside lane and snowflakes like complaining they cant go onto the slip road
Its got to be said, Range Rovers seem to be the 'go-to' vehicle of choice for all the aggressive, blasé, arrogant, shameless, egotistical people in society. Which is crazy when you think that the average cost is quite a bit higher that the 'Average' car - Maybe that's what money turns you into ????
The hazardous tanker wasn’t fighting for position it was in the middle lane getting speed up and was just holding its speed for big incline coming up. Unlike the clown on the right who lost all his momentum 😂
The blue truck was streamlining (using the front one to push the air out of the way), but the driver was too thick to know it - all racing car drivers know that you can sit behind a competitor and back off the pedal, then hit the gas to overtake and win. But trucks can't do that with speed limiters.
I don't think the cyclist stayed in their cycle lane - he appears really close to the pedestrians so I think the cyclist was cutting the corner across the pavement. (He did have hands on handlebars though, just not near the brakes). Also, "If my are hadn't been insured, I'd have been the one in court wouldn't I?". Yes you would - for not insuring your car!
Why do you caption a clip ‘near Warwickshire’. If it’s not in said county, then it is in another county. Or say (for example) ‘Warwickshire/Oxfordshire border’. It is lazy.
The last video with the person at the roundabout, the dashcam driver was in the wrong. The person turning right, even though they may not have been Indicating, was in the lane to turn right.
2nd clip, why did the cammer speed up and hit the vehicle, with how slow you set off the other guy was surely to go but was just a bit slow, you could have just eased off the accelerator and let them go. Like a knob you decided to show them
3:13 I saw something similar on the M1 southbound a couple of weeks ago. It’s in the four lane “smart” section where they’re constructing more emergency areas so lane 1 of 4 is closed, with lanes 2,3 and 4 as running lanes. There’s an HGV in lane 2, two HGVs in lane 3 and lane 4 is free. The trailing HGV in lane 3 decided to overtake the HGV in front of them by moving into lane 4, which is illegal on both 3 lane and 4 lane motorways.
Last clip, while they were in the wrong you totally missed the obvious hazard and didn't even slow down. There road positioning alone showed you where they intended to go.
I know the driving in the UK is really bad at times, but half of these clips are sent in by complete melts. Second clip could have been avoided, but you deliberately drove in to him to make a point. "Impatient manoeuvres" are not against the law, as in the vehicles turning right before the lights go back to green.
KENT CAM, that car had their tyres on the white line. YES they should have been further to the left. But they were inches over the divide not "nEaRlY cAuSinG HeAD-On CRAsH"
Denxo needs glasses, could tell from a mile off he would have to give way to that fiat as it was in the right hand lane for turning right so no signal needed.
Surprises me to see a hazardous tanker driver getting into a race to prove a point. Box truck in lane 3 overtaking, sure, it's a no no, but pising about with a tanker, what a total arsehole.
I can't believe the behaviour of the cammer in the second clip @0:36. Yes that car should not have pulled out, but instead of the cammer moderating his/her speed a little, just sat on the horn rather than taking any action to avoid the collision until too late (or was he/she deliberately getting close as a "punishment" manoeuvre and got it slightly wrong). That accident was so, so avoidable even with the behaviour of the silver car. It turned a non-event into something that is going to be an inconvenience and expense to both drivers. If the insurance companies get to see that footage, then it's likely to be considered a shared responsibility. In short, completely boneheaded driving. Also, there must be a big shortage of material if clips #1 and #4 were considered worthy of inclusion.
O M G ..... second clip!!!! The fiesta may not have looked or was just slow pulling away but, DID YOU LOOK WHERE YOU WERE EVEN GOING? You need to loose YOUR licence for this and be prosecuted for wrecklkess endangerment. YOU deliberately drove into that car, YOU are the worst driver out of the 2 by a long way. You used your car as a weapon and should be dealt with accordingly. You're not even a clown ........ you are much worse
Why was Ashmoto not riding in the centre of the lane where he would be in the van drivers blindspot if he was minding his own business in his lane. In reality, he was sneaking past to try to push in to turn right
4.20 driver says you stay where you are. Why not just let him out. Why do these dash campers cause so much trouble. No attempt to avoid the problem. It’s time we banned people from either owning cams or downloading them. This channel, like others is encouraging dangerous driving by the dashcammers camera so they can show their exploits.
Cyclist not concentrating and you comment”if my car wasn’t insured I would have been in court”……. Well duh if. You weren’t insured you shouldn’t be on the road anyway so yes you would be in court🤔
5.27 dash comer trying to keep up with the stupid chase. But why does the dash camper do that. Oh yes so he can post it. So yet again this site encouraging dangerous driving.
Wtf was clip number 2 doing , looks like he pulled out on one driver then speeds up to hit the other car . Good luck sending that footage in to your insurance company 😂😂😂
You can be a hgv driver at 18 now in the uk! Far too young and inexperienced! Happy to take unnecessary risks, because they know nothing yet believe they know everything!
@Nickbaldeagle02 very true! However, if you have had a car licence for a year, you can take hgv test at 18! Maybe agency will take them? Family business? Approximately 40000 loads a day short in the uk! Average hgv driver age is 60, so retirement not far away! Government has tried to get more drivers by lowering the age from 21 to 18! I deliver food in a 44t, 60 grand a year! I'm 50 with 25 years a hgv driver. 60k at 18......its possible!!
Agreed. Nothing wrong, nothing unsafe. Are they supposed to sit there idling and wasting time when their road is 40 ft away? Yes of course they are apparently!
Clip is from around 2018, silver mondeo driver was caught, got 6 points and fined £1000 after it was found the incident was initiated by him brake checking the mini who did actually make contact with the rear bumper of the mondeo
@@dazenza5934 Mondeo man got six months jail as well as the ban, and the mini driver was banned for 12 months and got 150 hours unpaid work and an 18 month community order.
The clip on the M40. Looks like lorry in the left lane held back speed to let middle lorry overtake quicker because they saw the lorry breaking the law in the 3rd lane. Unbelievable the lorry in the 3rd lane ends back in the left and wanted to come out again . In other parts of the Country where they call smart motorways with 4 lanes and no hard shoulder. Those motorways were fine before 3 lanes are enough. If all lorries stayed in left hand lane and only move across if something in front is going really slow. For anyone joining the motorway at junctions just hold back and leave a gap rather than going across.
so after watching literally hundreds of these clips, it seems to me that there is no point having a dashcam cause you are going to get the blame anyway, just my perspective.
The behaviour of the two trucks on the M40 is abhorrent. The rigid should not have been in the right most lane at all. This is the result of the government relaxing the rules on licenses following the pandemic. Cornflakes packet license holders.
4:46 The exact reason why cyclists should have insurance and number plates. Who's going to pay for any damage caused to that car if we don't know who he is?
It looks as if the cycle lane has priority, at 4:32 you can see the give way markings to the left of the drivers lane which are before the cycle symbol in the cycle lane, the cyclist also appears to be with in the cycle lane (rather than on the pavement) so it looks as if the driver's insurance will be paying for any damage to the car.
@@bthorne180607, when approaching a giveway line, you should stop and give way to traffic on the roundabout. Once a vehicle's front wheels have crossed the give-way lines, it has established its priority and others need to give way. Even if they didn't indicate their intention, it's essential to be cautious and stop at the giveaway lines. Check Section 185 of the Highway code. The fact that they didn't indicate their intention should have given them more reason to be cautious and stop at the giveaway lines.
@@bthorne180607 They entered the roundabout from a "TURN RIGHT" lane, and were well committed to the turn before the cammer entered the roundabout. The only fault lies with teh cammer there.
@@stuinNorway Wakey Wakey, you still indicate so others know what your are doing, if you don’t understand that you shouldn’t be on the road yourself. If you’re coming from the other direction you don’t know what that car is doing. Yes the cammer is in the wrong but there’s also blame on the other car not driving correctly
0:46 definitely sped up to end up hitting the corsa
2 drips 1 roundabout, literally mate if everybody in the uk wasnt always raging the roads would keep moving lol
Second clip Silver Cross, you blew your horn then drove into him. Your fault i would say.
I agree. If you have time to sound your horn, you have time to brake.
My thoughts exactly!!
Yes me too ! He had loads of time to brake
That driver is a clown. Total agree with you.
Looks like he was desperate to get a clip onto a dash cam channel at any cost. 😂
"Constant Busch" 0:50 probably time to hand your licence in. You deliberately drove into that car. You had plenty of time to take evasive action. Hope your insurance company is going to pull your pants down 😂
First clip, plenty of room pulling out of the petrol station, you were to far away to see if they had looked
0:30, that is so odd, pulls out with a car passing, bad positioning, speeds up when it is obvious someone has pulled out, time to hit horn, then a collision. I hope Insurance made you pay for that.
Reckon that would be a 50/50 claim, incident could have been avoided.
@@george-ev1dqI think with this video it would be hard to argue 50/50 it was a deliberate ram. He easily had time to stop and chose not to. 50/50 is when you both make a mistake and it's unavailable. This was 100% avoidable. He chose not to and ram the other car.
@@TheIntronD they both did make a mistake, the other driver failed to give way to traffic on the roundabout and approaching from the right.
@@george-ev1dq
Criminal intent overrides regular liability. Cammer should pay 100% there unless both insurance companies drop the ball badly.
Cammer should also be charged for that.
@@SVEVelsen Fair point, but insurance companies want to screw all parties over to max out their profits, they like to find blame where there is none and they do not operate within the Highway code and RTA, they make the rules up to suit their deep pockets.
First one is nothing
Made to look worse by the camera zooming in. Did the cammer even need to slow down here?
As an HGV driver i have seen trucks trying to pass each other and no one easing off to let the other pass. They still havent figured it out that you get no where doing an extra half mile an hour!!!
Is embarrassing tp watch
Used to be class one and I can only think that there is no deterrent and very poor training these days. In my day losing your license for minor infringements was a very real possibility but I've seen class one drivers on tv shouting the odds with the police when caught driving illegally; about time the law was enforced.
7:03 looks to me like the other car was already on the roundabout it was up to you to look to your right, and slow down.. it's a roundabout, not a straight road for you..
this channels commenters are fucking idiots like. car doesnt indicate intention, "Why DiDnT tHe CaMmEr ReAD MiNds!?!?!"
Totally agree with you. If an accident was caused the cammer would have full responsibility as you have to give way to the right of you. Fiat driver was in the right.
@@TCTeslaTPT2 the opposite car cut across the roundabout, so not really. both in the wrong. if this went to court, it's equally liable.
cammer for not slowing and following the roundabout which would increase the distance between them and the opposite car.
the opposite car for not going AROUND the roundabout and slowing down in the process, not to mention indicating their intention. again, this would increase the distance between them and the cammer.
you can't just use "give way to the right" as a defence.
@@EricSmith-km1jbCompletely agree.
The cam car appears to speed up but the oncoming car, in displaying no indication, was in fact indicating to go straight on.
Drivers using indicators is getting less and less, nowadays, and it’s a crashingly poor trait.
@@BionicRustythey were in the right only turn lane, no going straight ahead in that lane
Most of this is not necessary, it’s just confrontational and aggressive on the part of the cars with the dashcams.
Absolutely true.
Driving to make content. To much of it going on now.
That was the worst braking I've ever seen in that second clip. Glad you recorded it. Just dangerous. 0:32
That's the worst spelling of braking I've ever seen.
@@Nickbaldeagle02 Haha good point 🤣
The last clip, the cammer, was at fault they should have slowed down when approaching the roundabout
7:05 really rubbish driving from both cars, the cammer not reading the road and not giving way at the roundabout but also the black car with no indication of where it’s going
So an HGV limited to 56mph,ants to overtake another doing 53mph,to gain what,exactly? Seen this stupid behaviour so many times.
3 miles every hour further down the road so 30 miles in a 10 hour day. Not saying that what that muppet was doing in the outside lane was correct but explaining what they gain.
not as stupid as you, if every truck fell in line you would have a wall of trucks on the inside lane and snowflakes like complaining they cant go onto the slip road
Hgv allowed in outside lane IF it is a two lane motorway.
@@kevinkaos5118IF it's not articulated.
The tanker is equally to blame. Professional muppets more like
Its got to be said, Range Rovers seem to be the 'go-to' vehicle of choice for all the aggressive, blasé, arrogant, shameless, egotistical people in society.
Which is crazy when you think that the average cost is quite a bit higher that the 'Average' car - Maybe that's what money turns you into ????
The hazardous tanker wasn’t fighting for position it was in the middle lane getting speed up and was just holding its speed for big incline coming up. Unlike the clown on the right who lost all his momentum 😂
The blue truck was streamlining (using the front one to push the air out of the way), but the driver was too thick to know it - all racing car drivers know that you can sit behind a competitor and back off the pedal, then hit the gas to overtake and win. But trucks can't do that with speed limiters.
4:27 it looks as though Chris had Give Way markings across his road.
I don't think the cyclist stayed in their cycle lane - he appears really close to the pedestrians so I think the cyclist was cutting the corner across the pavement. (He did have hands on handlebars though, just not near the brakes). Also, "If my are hadn't been insured, I'd have been the one in court wouldn't I?". Yes you would - for not insuring your car!
0:35 did they have a brake malfunction because otherwise that accident was completely 100% avoidable.
Denxo, the other cars road position. That how you (if you were a decent observant driver) know the other car was going to turn across the roundabout.
Why do you caption a clip ‘near Warwickshire’. If it’s not in said county, then it is in another county. Or say (for example) ‘Warwickshire/Oxfordshire border’. It is lazy.
0:40 the cammer should pay a visit to Specsavers he had time to clean his car before driving into the silver one
The last video with the person at the roundabout, the dashcam driver was in the wrong. The person turning right, even though they may not have been Indicating, was in the lane to turn right.
2nd clip, why did the cammer speed up and hit the vehicle, with how slow you set off the other guy was surely to go but was just a bit slow, you could have just eased off the accelerator and let them go. Like a knob you decided to show them
3:13 I saw something similar on the M1 southbound a couple of weeks ago. It’s in the four lane “smart” section where they’re constructing more emergency areas so lane 1 of 4 is closed, with lanes 2,3 and 4 as running lanes. There’s an HGV in lane 2, two HGVs in lane 3 and lane 4 is free. The trailing HGV in lane 3 decided to overtake the HGV in front of them by moving into lane 4, which is illegal on both 3 lane and 4 lane motorways.
Not really correct. A motorhome over 3.5 tonne is classed as a Private Heavy Goods Vehicle and is allowed to use the outside lane on motorways.
Last clip, while they were in the wrong you totally missed the obvious hazard and didn't even slow down. There road positioning alone showed you where they intended to go.
I know the driving in the UK is really bad at times, but half of these clips are sent in by complete melts. Second clip could have been avoided, but you deliberately drove in to him to make a point. "Impatient manoeuvres" are not against the law, as in the vehicles turning right before the lights go back to green.
KENT CAM, that car had their tyres on the white line. YES they should have been further to the left. But they were inches over the divide not "nEaRlY cAuSinG HeAD-On CRAsH"
Not nearly a head on no, but the whole tyre was over the line. So how far over is the mirror that needs avoiding with their mirror on a narrow road?
@@grumpyone5963 I saw 90% of the tyre over, even so you agree "car not in lane" is closer to his spasout.
I didn’t realise car manufacturers fitted indicators to cars anymore 😂😂
3rd clip, ya shoulda expected that, I did. & I’m watching on a tiny phone screen!
0:50 your reaction time is stupidly bad, hope the insurance doesn't pay out
Denxo needs glasses, could tell from a mile off he would have to give way to that fiat as it was in the right hand lane for turning right so no signal needed.
Constant Busch , you had all that time to lean on the horn, yet no time to slow down or brake! Multi-tasking too much for you?
Last one, because you always assume other drivers may go around a roundabout and not signal…..slow down as you approach!
Why is 6.20 a problem. Did the poor camper have his ego bruised.
Surprises me to see a hazardous tanker driver getting into a race to prove a point. Box truck in lane 3 overtaking, sure, it's a no no, but pising about with a tanker, what a total arsehole.
That HGV clip. Just wow
Lol didn't realise the police had silver vans with ladders on top 😂😂😂
I don't think people which hold their hands up to say sorry should be put on the internet. WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES.
I can't believe the behaviour of the cammer in the second clip @0:36. Yes that car should not have pulled out, but instead of the cammer moderating his/her speed a little, just sat on the horn rather than taking any action to avoid the collision until too late (or was he/she deliberately getting close as a "punishment" manoeuvre and got it slightly wrong). That accident was so, so avoidable even with the behaviour of the silver car. It turned a non-event into something that is going to be an inconvenience and expense to both drivers. If the insurance companies get to see that footage, then it's likely to be considered a shared responsibility.
In short, completely boneheaded driving.
Also, there must be a big shortage of material if clips #1 and #4 were considered worthy of inclusion.
Third clip: always slow down entering an intersection. It’s commonsense when other lanes are obstructed from view.
How many times can the cam car driver show they are not reading the road either?
Cammers generally driving too close to vehicles in front, or not showing consideration or patience.
2nd clip should be prosecuted, that is blatant dangerous driving .
That car was driven in to on purpose.
Scruff was driving far too fast in that situation. Both equal to blame
Last clip at the mini roundabout was the dashcam drivers fault
00:32 Cammer has the reaction time of a zombie.
5:08... bell-ends.
Have your fun, stay safe! What a weird expression.
O M G ..... second clip!!!! The fiesta may not have looked or was just slow pulling away but, DID YOU LOOK WHERE YOU WERE EVEN GOING? You need to loose YOUR licence for this and be prosecuted for wrecklkess endangerment. YOU deliberately drove into that car, YOU are the worst driver out of the 2 by a long way. You used your car as a weapon and should be dealt with accordingly.
You're not even a clown ........ you are much worse
3;57 what a pair of numptys
Jesus some of these, never looked or gave way lol. My guess is they did look, saw the cammer was about 2 miles away and so pulled out. Just saying.
4:58. Mini vs Mondeo clip is at least a couple of years old if not older than that. I saw it a long time ago.
Why was Ashmoto not riding in the centre of the lane where he would be in the van drivers blindspot if he was minding his own business in his lane. In reality, he was sneaking past to try to push in to turn right
£1.39 PL for diesel how old is that clip 0:24
It seems to me most of these people seem think because they have a camera they are in the right we all make errors of judgment now and again
2nd one guy must be blind as a bat, as could easily see what was the silver car doing.
Dude in the 2nd clip at well long enough to avoid that. Just as much of a plonker as the corsa driver.
4.20 driver says you stay where you are. Why not just let him out. Why do these dash campers cause so much trouble. No attempt to avoid the problem. It’s time we banned people from either owning cams or downloading them. This channel, like others is encouraging dangerous driving by the dashcammers camera so they can show their exploits.
2:44 - An elephant race of the worst kind.
2:45 So sorry that he then went on to pass you within the same lane. Yeah. Im sure.
Last clip ... Always anticipate no indication just incase 🤷
sun in the eyes is no excuse,..if you cant see,.stop,...
You shouldn't enter roundabout when someone already there, signal or no signal
Cyclist not concentrating and you comment”if my car wasn’t insured I would have been in court”……. Well duh if. You weren’t insured you shouldn’t be on the road anyway so yes you would be in court🤔
Bellends pulling out onto roundabouts is a new phenomenon in 2024 🧐
5.27 dash comer trying to keep up with the stupid chase. But why does the dash camper do that. Oh yes so he can post it. So yet again this site encouraging dangerous driving.
ditch the music
You can't teach stupidity
Clip one ,?
Wtf was clip number 2 doing , looks like he pulled out on one driver then speeds up to hit the other car . Good luck sending that footage in to your insurance company 😂😂😂
You can be a hgv driver at 18 now in the uk! Far too young and inexperienced! Happy to take unnecessary risks, because they know nothing yet believe they know everything!
I doubt it. Most companies want 2 years experience or over 21 for insurance.
@Nickbaldeagle02 very true! However, if you have had a car licence for a year, you can take hgv test at 18! Maybe agency will take them? Family business? Approximately 40000 loads a day short in the uk! Average hgv driver age is 60, so retirement not far away! Government has tried to get more drivers by lowering the age from 21 to 18! I deliver food in a 44t, 60 grand a year! I'm 50 with 25 years a hgv driver. 60k at 18......its possible!!
I agree with the comment below your fault. And could have slowed down or stopped easily
@6.09 Both drivers may be impatient but as the oncoming vehicles were way off down the road there was no danger & no laws broken
Agreed. Nothing wrong, nothing unsafe. Are they supposed to sit there idling and wasting time when their road is 40 ft away? Yes of course they are apparently!
5:21 The way the silver car carried on cannot be justified, but the blue mini was lane hogging and obviously wound up the other driver.
Clip is from around 2018, silver mondeo driver was caught, got 6 points and fined £1000 after it was found the incident was initiated by him brake checking the mini who did actually make contact with the rear bumper of the mondeo
@@dazenza5934 Mondeo man got six months jail as well as the ban, and the mini driver was banned for 12 months and got 150 hours unpaid work and an 18 month community order.
The clip on the M40. Looks like lorry in the left lane held back speed to let middle lorry overtake quicker because they saw the lorry breaking the law in the 3rd lane. Unbelievable the lorry in the 3rd lane ends back in the left and wanted to come out again .
In other parts of the Country where they call smart motorways with 4 lanes and no hard shoulder. Those motorways were fine before 3 lanes are enough. If all lorries stayed in left hand lane and only move across if something in front is going really slow. For anyone joining the motorway at junctions just hold back and leave a gap rather than going across.
so after watching literally hundreds of these clips, it seems to me that there is no point having a dashcam cause you are going to get the blame anyway, just my perspective.
Or…the reason they buy a dashcam is because they’re always getting involved in incidents and are too useless to understand what they’re doing wrong.
Only if you drive like a knob.
hi can have shout out
The behaviour of the two trucks on the M40 is abhorrent. The rigid should not have been in the right most lane at all. This is the result of the government relaxing the rules on licenses following the pandemic. Cornflakes packet license holders.
Yawn!
2:00 you need to get your eyesight fixed, near head on ffs
1:56 typical overreacting cyclist
First cyclist I've seen with a dash board!!
Not what I'd class as a HGV and not an illegal overtake. Unwise, but not illegal.
4:46 The exact reason why cyclists should have insurance and number plates. Who's going to pay for any damage caused to that car if we don't know who he is?
It looks as if the cycle lane has priority, at 4:32 you can see the give way markings to the left of the drivers lane which are before the cycle symbol in the cycle lane, the cyclist also appears to be with in the cycle lane (rather than on the pavement) so it looks as if the driver's insurance will be paying for any damage to the car.
7.03. She doesn’t have to signal on a roundabout. 100% your fault.
Your wrong, she should have indicated, indicators are for others to know where your going
She has to indicate, and it's a mini-roundabout. Bad driving from both drivers there, as she had priority over the cammer.
@@bthorne180607, when approaching a giveway line, you should stop and give way to traffic on the roundabout. Once a vehicle's front wheels have crossed the give-way lines, it has established its priority and others need to give way. Even if they didn't indicate their intention, it's essential to be cautious and stop at the giveaway lines. Check Section 185 of the Highway code. The fact that they didn't indicate their intention should have given them more reason to be cautious and stop at the giveaway lines.
@@bthorne180607 They entered the roundabout from a "TURN RIGHT" lane, and were well committed to the turn before the cammer entered the roundabout. The only fault lies with teh cammer there.
@@stuinNorway Wakey Wakey, you still indicate so others know what your are doing, if you don’t understand that you shouldn’t be on the road yourself. If you’re coming from the other direction you don’t know what that car is doing.
Yes the cammer is in the wrong but there’s also blame on the other car not driving correctly