Mein Papa spielte dieses Meisterwerk, ich spielte es auch. Es lässt grossen Spielraum für Interpretation so, so und anders und noch anders. Klar, dass mich die eine Interpretation weniger, die andere mehr begeistert. Vorliegende Wiedergabe durch Samson Francois gehört zu den Eindrücklichsten, innigsten, leidenschaftlichsten, die ich kenne. Ganz phantastisch. Superlativ. Danke, Samson, du beglückst mich. Danke, unbekannter "Rauflader"!
J repeat always the same thing , j can't say more : here we are above piano-technic , above notes , above piano there is somethinģ as a soul that comes from elsewvere , not only as perfect-piano 2020 : meticulous piano with very great technic only
I agree the one comment below regarding the speed Francois took here. Right from the first notes I feel he is in too much of a hurry. I much rather prefer the recording by that great master of the piano music of Franck and Faure, Germain Thyssens-Valentin (my 1st choice), as well as the recording by Sviatoslav Richter (my 2nd choice) over this.I am a great admirer of Samson Francois (especially in Chopin and French music), but here, for me he, is missing it a bit.
Ewald Steyn : many people prefer russians often j think for me the French and the Russian are two different concepts it's a raison for Russians are the best in Rachmaninov Prokofiev often in Chopin j agree about this but in fact the French his less technical in his spirit than russians Richter of course Debussy Ravek is he the alone ? for everybody ? It's a personnal choice , it's your choice and the mine
I think Fauré and Franck are different enough to require different qualities of the performer. Mme. Thyssens-Valentin is and will always be unsurpassed for Fauré, for me the same approach for Franck comes out a bit understated. Numerous other fine readings are out there.
Je suis un de ses compatriotes et je ne me suis pas retourné dans ma tombe parce que 1) je ne suis pas mort, 2) j'ai beaucoup apprécié son interprétation poétique, méditative, non hiératique et (presque) sans pathos. Ce qui n'est pas pour critiquer d'autres interprétations qui jettent une lumière différente sur cette œuvre. Comme l'écrit Thom Ram Voegeli, il y a beaucoup de place ici pour des interprétations très différentes!
Incroyable la compréhension et l’interprétation de Franck sous les doigts de ce pianiste de génie ❤
Как прекрасна музыка Сезара Франка и кажется,
что звуки эти взяты и из
твоей души тоже.
Благодарю,Вас!
Bellissimo suono. Originale interpretazione. Grande musica misteriosa. Grazie!
Mein Papa spielte dieses Meisterwerk, ich spielte es auch.
Es lässt grossen Spielraum für Interpretation so, so und anders und noch anders. Klar, dass mich die eine Interpretation weniger, die andere mehr begeistert.
Vorliegende Wiedergabe durch Samson Francois gehört zu den Eindrücklichsten, innigsten, leidenschaftlichsten, die ich kenne. Ganz phantastisch. Superlativ.
Danke, Samson, du beglückst mich.
Danke, unbekannter "Rauflader"!
一度コルトーの妖気漂う演奏を聴くとなかなか他の演奏に馴染めない曲ですが、フランソワはまた別のイメージを抱かせてくれる演奏です、。
This is absolutely magnificent. Absolute Genius.
Merci ! magnifique !
Glorious! What a beast!
Phenomenal!
He's best!
He has very alive Tempo--rhythme & right sound..!
Jrduoodestrxrgrdsggtrnvnshrfshtjrvrvlnnsudissleffbjrtfiidjsurgrfuujoruvgtgtencidikeinsjrhribrejciieilr
kjoi tgtttokdrfct
J repeat always the same thing , j can't say more : here we are above piano-technic , above notes , above piano there is somethinģ as a soul that comes from elsewvere , not only as perfect-piano 2020 : meticulous piano with very great technic only
I agree the one comment below regarding the speed Francois took here. Right from the first notes I feel he is in too much of a hurry. I much rather prefer the recording by that great master of the piano music of Franck and Faure, Germain Thyssens-Valentin (my 1st choice), as well as the recording by Sviatoslav Richter (my 2nd choice) over this.I am a great admirer of Samson Francois (especially in Chopin and French music), but here, for me he, is missing it a bit.
Ewald Steyn : many people prefer russians often j think for me the French and the Russian are two different concepts it's a raison for Russians are the best in Rachmaninov Prokofiev often in Chopin j agree about this but in fact the French his less technical in his spirit than russians Richter of course Debussy Ravek is he the alone ? for everybody ? It's a personnal choice , it's your choice and the mine
I think Fauré and Franck are different enough to require different qualities of the performer. Mme. Thyssens-Valentin is and will always be unsurpassed for Fauré, for me the same approach for Franck comes out a bit understated. Numerous other fine readings are out there.
How can he run through the second piece with so much disregard. If I were his countryman, I would turn in my grave!
Je suis un de ses compatriotes et je ne me suis pas retourné dans ma tombe parce que 1) je ne suis pas mort, 2) j'ai beaucoup apprécié son interprétation poétique, méditative, non hiératique et (presque) sans pathos. Ce qui n'est pas pour critiquer d'autres interprétations qui jettent une lumière différente sur cette œuvre. Comme l'écrit Thom Ram Voegeli, il y a beaucoup de place ici pour des interprétations très différentes!
Who the fuck disliked that?
This is absolutely magnificent. Absolute Genius.