RunCam Wasp 120fps DJI FPV Camera 📸

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @AlbertKimTV
    @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    📸 RunCam Wasp DJI FPV Camera
    RDQ - bit.ly/3TUlXQY (kit) | bit.ly/3WjHvId (cam only)
    AX - bit.ly/3EuIcbl
    RC - bit.ly/3yvUzQC
    🙏 Please support with a 👍 and don’t forget to hit the 🔔 thanks!
    💲 If you enjoy my content, please support my channel through these links
    Patreon - www.patreon.com/albertkim
    Amazon - amzn.to/3zq84zp
    RaceDayQuads - bit.ly/RDQ-BF
    GetFPV - bit.ly/3wWbziq
    Banggood - bit.ly/3imXlie
    Airblade - bit.ly/3ilYVRr
    NewBeeDrone - bit.ly/3BhFdPu
    Makerfire - bit.ly/2VGI3Kg
    Aliexpress - bit.ly/3im17IF
    XT-XINTE - bit.ly/3inl7KQ
    Insta360 - bit.ly/2VRDNe5
    PayPal - paypal.me/marblekit
    👉 Old gear for sale here - bit.ly/AlbertGearFS
    👉 Follow me on social
    🐤 twitter.com/albertkim
    📸 instagram.com/marblekit/

    • @xnoux1
      @xnoux1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      did you notice a better image in low-light condition when in "high quality" (60fps) mode? I doubt it changed a lot but was wondering. Thank you for the awesome job :)

    • @xavierprimeto1752
      @xavierprimeto1752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xnoux1 He said there was no high quality mode on this camera in the video. You must have missed that.

    • @xnoux1
      @xnoux1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xavierprimeto1752 totally missed that thanks :)

  • @jaechoe
    @jaechoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Nice to see the new Wasp from Runcam. Decent camera, and the price of $140 for the set (vista and camera) not bad. Just glad someone will continue offer the DJI FPV gear. Great review Albert!!!

  • @grisvianbrudlie6093
    @grisvianbrudlie6093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah yes...1080p 120fps every budget gamer's dream, now its every analog pilot's dream. Cant believe how good video transmission tech have advanced. Great review...!!

  • @SimplyGod100
    @SimplyGod100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome camera from runcam, can't beat it for the price! Great video as always, Albert!

  • @nuno5125
    @nuno5125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's nice to see a 4:3 dji compatible camera.
    I have heard that this camera has better dinamyc range than the original dji camera, and thus it better at daytime. At night it adds more noise to the image.
    I prefer the colors on the runcam wasp at daytime and the caddx polar at nightime.
    Awesome flight footage and comparison Albert.

  • @jlarson42
    @jlarson42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review of the wasp camera. Daylight image quality looks very good. Low light, the Polar smokes it. I like the price of the wasp/link. Happy flying everyone. 😎

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for watching!

  • @WildCaptures
    @WildCaptures 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man digital FPV looks like a game changer, Dear Santa 🎅👍

  • @jsnlmb42
    @jsnlmb42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting new camera. I like the new runcam marriage with dji system. I don’t need to seriously pixel peep to tell the difference it’s pretty obvious to me at least.
    Thanks for the review. 😊🤙

  • @Bruno-cb5gk
    @Bruno-cb5gk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    the saturation seems more natural than the nebula pro which looks washed out, but the sharpening on the wasp is just way too high, everything has this white halo around it.

  • @deadlazlo
    @deadlazlo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got the nebula pro from caddx after my DJI camera died 2 months in. Caddx at the time told me they had run out of DJI cameras and I had to get the nebula pro. Myself, I don’t like it as much. Image is very nice, similar to the wasp. While I accept that 4:3 is desirable by some, I personally prefer the 16:9.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting... one of the few people who admit they prefer 16:9... most people are the opposite...

    • @deadlazlo
      @deadlazlo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlbertKimTV I grew up with square tvs. I don’t like it anymore.

  • @sanketss84
    @sanketss84 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks this was helpful

  • @TonyToretto25
    @TonyToretto25 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for that explanation of 60fps vs 120fps for low light.

  • @monolith2001
    @monolith2001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is timely as I am doing a build but haven't decided what camera/AU Lite I was going to go with. I love the Neb Pro as I love 4:3 (especially with WTF.OS telemetry in the black margins). I also have a couple of Caddx Polar Flywoo's that are perfect for my after work low-light flying. This camera seems like a good compromise to me but hoping that it supports the WTF.OS jailbreak as it requires a firmware update.

  • @flipfpv4539
    @flipfpv4539 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Albert is the camera connection to the vista unit the same as the caddx ie can I swap camera’s same coaxial connectors

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, the Link and the Vista are identical.

  • @vanlifefpv6340
    @vanlifefpv6340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice camera but what is that new quad?

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought the same, but the top plate appears to be a bit different.

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AerialWaviator maybe is a rekon 5 clone . I think Albert said in the video that it was 5 inch.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome flying and review, Albert! 😃
    The footage looks fantastic indeed!
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @pandrews01
    @pandrews01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is this "witchcraft?" 120 fps? Awesome. I have a DJI Camera. The camera is great, color performance is awesome, but low light performance is lacking. I do actually prefer the polar vista. The lowlight performance allows me to fly in an almost completely dark room/area. The wasp seem to have better color performance and picks up more colors during daylight, but it, seems to be, rather poor in low light. The wasp has a feature set I'm sure would appeal to some, while other will be less impressed. I like it's daylight performance, better color profile, although it does seem a little more grainy. Great video!! Nice camera. I'm sure it will appeal to some pilots. Thanks for the introduction and comparison review.

  • @slaughtercarterfpv1336
    @slaughtercarterfpv1336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I kinda like the Wasp

  • @deeph46
    @deeph46 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which DJI Assistant to update the Vista firmware?

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      DJI Assistant 2 (DJI FPV Series)

    • @deeph46
      @deeph46 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlbertKimTV Thanks Albert, there are 3 DJI Assistant 2's versions. I installed the others, I wonder why I can't connect it lol

  • @kangwonbo1
    @kangwonbo1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    dji 고글에서만 사용가능한건가요?

  • @LuFpv
    @LuFpv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sembra molto interessante come prodotto...ma che abbassino le pretese perchè io con quella cifra ci faccio un intero drone...

  • @epicchris89
    @epicchris89 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to change the camera to a og CAM without losing anything? Thanks in advance

  • @kkeil9449
    @kkeil9449 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ahahaha Tustin, one of my old stomping grounds. Nebula pro looked better to me & the wasp looked horrible on TV.

  • @eliokreier522
    @eliokreier522 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does the wasp has more pixelation/smearing then the nebula pro/OG DJI Cam? I have noticed this on other reviews to.

    • @eliokreier522
      @eliokreier522 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Adam_Carbone it is possible that it has to do with the over sharpened picture but i think in the same frame the OG cam has more details in for example the grass them the wasp. The wasp has some compression going on where the og cam doesn't have that. The og cam is probably better tuned to the video link behaviour then the wasp. I noticed this compression issues in the 60fps cams to.

  • @slaughtercarterfpv1336
    @slaughtercarterfpv1336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now night time is a different story lol

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, it introduces a lot of noise.

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      120fps is the reason why...

    • @nuno5125
      @nuno5125 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AerialWaviator yeah that makes sense. It introduces more noise,but has the advantage of being lower latency.

  • @rcrdps8144
    @rcrdps8144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice comparisons. I think I'll pass on this one. Hopefully they release a "Pro" with HQ and adjustable settings. Will probably also need to be a nano since I'm figuring v3 AU and cam will be my goto for "full size" cams.

    • @xavierprimeto1752
      @xavierprimeto1752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They already made the Pro version... it's called the Falcon and he reviewed it last month.

    • @rcrdps8144
      @rcrdps8144 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xavierprimeto1752 Cool. Must have missed that with all of the Avata talk. Appears to be a good replacement.

  • @Latchfpv
    @Latchfpv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Psychadellic Sundays~~~

  • @sivisjoe9877
    @sivisjoe9877 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think it's the same lens, the sun halo is different

    • @AlbertKimTV
      @AlbertKimTV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It just looks the same from the outside. Probably some different lens elements on the inside.