Lessons from My Ethical Non-Monogamous Household | Luna Martinez | TEDxCSU

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 201

  • @eu4iceuforic82
    @eu4iceuforic82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    Loved the acknowledgment that there is so much more to life than rushing into “perfection” before being “too old.” You’re never too old to fall in love again and re-invent yourself. These rules don’t work for everyone and it takes intelligence to think independently and create your own rules. It’s about choice.

  • @drewl
    @drewl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    I say it all the time. There cannot be only one “the one” in a world of 8 billion people. Love can be abundant and boundless.

    • @nyterpfan
      @nyterpfan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Agree 100% (And the world would be a much happier and joyful place if we didn't put such "boundaries" on love!!)

    • @Spacesiren777
      @Spacesiren777 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      there’s no limits to love. but monogamy and polyamory in especially romantic relationships can definitely be a conscious choice in allignment w each individual

    • @GT-vi6xj
      @GT-vi6xj ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@nyterpfan 0:30 i

    • @bat1579
      @bat1579 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Thats not love, thats horniness

    • @eternity2221
      @eternity2221 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just say you wanna cheat

  • @nirjaldhungana9761
    @nirjaldhungana9761 4 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    Monogamy shall be a matter of choice, not compulsion.

    • @omprakashbiswas3254
      @omprakashbiswas3254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      I would tell the opposite.
      Polygamy should be a choice, not the norm

    • @nirjaldhungana9761
      @nirjaldhungana9761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@omprakashbiswas3254 Totally agreed!

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@omprakashbiswas3254 that's not really the opposite though, is it? I mean, non monogamy doesn't always equal polygamy.

    • @keithklassen5320
      @keithklassen5320 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@omprakashbiswas3254 That's not the opposite at all.

    • @ASH-bb4sg
      @ASH-bb4sg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      well ofc its a choice, everything is a choice. but most of time not not advisable bcz its not that good of a choice.

  • @lotus8395
    @lotus8395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I’m grateful you had the parents you did

  • @LoveUnderWill
    @LoveUnderWill 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I am of the belief that a person has MANY soulmates throughout their life. None more significant of meaningful than others, all with their own grace and charm along with ups and downs. Each soulmate comes into a person's life for a season and for a purpose. Not all soulmates are romantic either. Some people were simply meant to be in your life. ❤❤❤

  • @upcoming3341
    @upcoming3341 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Man, there is a lot of hate on here! Most of you seem to set in this cookie-cutter, monogamous, wet blanket of a view on healthy relationships. I’ve been in a non-monogamous relationship for 10 years now, and my wife and I are miles ahead in communication and happiness, then most of the relationships I know. Non-monogamy isn’t for everyone, but just to hate because it’s not “the norm,” is not only sad. It’s boring.

  • @annahappen7036
    @annahappen7036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    Great hearing from a child of a non-monogamous household. Polys need more visibility. 🙌

    • @gigifabozzi5433
      @gigifabozzi5433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Without monogamy society can't exist

    • @schnuffchen0102
      @schnuffchen0102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@gigifabozzi5433 Lol, that's obviously not true 😂

    • @gigifabozzi5433
      @gigifabozzi5433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@schnuffchen0102 there is no society that was able to thrive without monogamy. Birth rates are collapsing if you want to use current society as an example, if the trend continues we will go extinct.

    • @antoinethename9064
      @antoinethename9064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@gigifabozzi5433 good.

    • @ugleebuggs7597
      @ugleebuggs7597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @Anna Happen. No, poly-relationships do not need more visibility. Let’s not normalise this. 🤦🏻‍♀️😅

  • @nbucwa6621
    @nbucwa6621 4 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    Great to non-monog families coming more in to the light and being open about their experiences around it.

  • @joyell5410
    @joyell5410 4 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    This was fantastic. You’re very intelligent, passionate and a powerful speaker.

  • @SerenEnfys
    @SerenEnfys 2 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I hate to be the 70th commenter lol but it's just so sad and pitiful that so many commenters here clearly know nothing about ENM.
    Clearly none of you know of the tribes and societies that have existed for thousands of years with poly being a core value in their lives, and has in fact, strengthened their chances of survival.
    Clearly the talker has issues that need to be self-investigated and ironed out, and maybe ENM (ethical being everyone involved has consented and is comfortable and happy - why can't people accept this I don't know...) is a helpful tool for getting on the healthiest path for _their_ life; not yours, theirs! Which, NONE of us have a right to tell them how that should look or how they should do it because none of us know what is best for them as we have not lived their life.
    It's very clear that the people crying that poly being "unnatural", (which you can't truly believe yourselves when HALF of marriages , the ultimate monogamous goal, end in divorce...) have issues controlling and differentiating their emotions and biases with facts and information. If you're not even here to learn about what ENM can look like, then you're just here cause you like the sound of your own voice and want to make your self feel better about your life choices through the act of projection.
    You see how the bio says, "personal narrative", yeah, that says everything you need to know about how this video should be taken, yet you've got your knickers in a twist because it goes against what Disney films have taught you and what society expects from you.
    I hope you all have wonderful relationships throughout your lives, I really do, but so far in my life I have only met polyamorous people who are consciously working on becoming responsible and accountable partners, be that in jealousy or how one conducts relationships in general.
    Monogamous people have a lot to learn about self-reflection when it comes in comparison to poly people.

    • @absolutelyfookinnobody2843
      @absolutelyfookinnobody2843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's funny how so many people give their opinion acting like they know what they are saying

    • @cesruhf2605
      @cesruhf2605 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "poly being a core value in their lives, and has in fact, strengthened their chances of survival." nah bro they just do what they want and move on with their day. no one who was polygamous think polygamy is a "core value"

  • @paulrigney540
    @paulrigney540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Interesting perspective She showed lots of courage to be so honest. Never really considered the poly amorous life style.

  • @SomeGuyWatchingYoutube
    @SomeGuyWatchingYoutube ปีที่แล้ว +20

    as a completely open minded person this was probably the least profound TEDx talk ive watched and ive seen a lot... I respect her position but this is heavily biased and less informative than the podcasts she "cited" (the citations were.... what). I understand this was "lesson I learned", Its just not I came to learn from TEDx about. I heard her and again can respect her point and at the end of the day more women are going to be hurt by men. Men will also be hurt by women. Its beyond me to think that humanity is disolving into a state of distrust and disillusion around the idea of what a healthy relationship looks like. HOT TAKE: STOP BUYING INTO PEOPLE WHO DONT GENUINELY CARE ABOUT YOU
    Edit: As humans we have free will. We are responsible for ourselves and what we create. If someone can make this work cool, and to also spout this off at a science convention without someeeeee science or at least have some sort of professional citation instead of "podcast" in the last 30 seconds. I watch this 3 times before commenting, and I can say I didnt learn anything more than a personal perspective of ONE person. Kinda expected more when I search to learn more from an accredited source for bringing in professionals. @ me Its my opinion just as much as I watch 15 minutes of her PERSONAL opinion

  • @preciousmousse
    @preciousmousse ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Interesting. I've been brought up in a way that didn't make marriage seem like the center of existence and I've been comfortably single and also feel comfortable about marrying monogamously as now I am almost 30. From my perspective polyamory is a sort of reaction to a feeling of obligation to have a relationship where freedom is found through going from one relationship to more. Personally I've always found freedom in pursuing passions that don't require relationships (arts).

  • @babicady2035
    @babicady2035 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks so much for sharing your experiences and resources, great job!

  • @spiritzweispirit1st638
    @spiritzweispirit1st638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Fully Support! Great Presentation!Blessings Always!🌈🌎🌍🌏🌌

  • @nyterpfan
    @nyterpfan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    To quote Osho--(a very prolific Buddhist writer)--"Love is not a possession--it is a state of being."
    There would be so much more joy and happiness in this world if this quote became the standard definition of love--and if we lived it each day!!

    • @absolutelyfookinnobody2843
      @absolutelyfookinnobody2843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No it wouldn't and it won't

    • @rayenova
      @rayenova ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cool words, but lots of way more reputable people said similar things! Osho (Rajneesh) was not buddhist. He was the *very* controversial leader of a well known cult (check out the documentary Wild, Wild Country!).

    • @nyterpfan
      @nyterpfan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rayenova I saw that documentary--it paints a somewhat "slanted" picture IMHO. (As far as Osho not being Buddhist read his book "The Buddha Said"--it is obvious that Osho at the minimum was HEAVILY influenced by Buddha's teachings.)

    • @hunterherrington2066
      @hunterherrington2066 ปีที่แล้ว

      you're a pseudo intellectual spiritual matt stoney, you should never speak your opinion in public again

    • @Joseph-mm4zu
      @Joseph-mm4zu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what he whispered to your wife before he took her to his room

  • @Fromwhere1998
    @Fromwhere1998 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A key takeaway from this talk is that having a prominent platform to express one's views does not necessarily validate the quality or credibility of those views.

  • @jessiejamesleano4019
    @jessiejamesleano4019 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great idea and nice talk. Im not looking at how you perform and how about you talk. I think you will get more better and for me also when you do it consistently . However im looking and listening on what you are speaking of and its great ,love it thanks

  • @azharulquadriofficial6507
    @azharulquadriofficial6507 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Good working TEdx talk but you should broadcast video with subtitles.

  • @katiemckie4624
    @katiemckie4624 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great talk!

  • @ibrahimsoukak437
    @ibrahimsoukak437 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m genuinely interested what this kind of relationships have to offer. I consider myself a very open-minded person, yet I can never for the life of me accept sharing my partner with others. I would feel super jealous to open my relationship.

    • @dannybrandon6215
      @dannybrandon6215 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And that’s okay! I’ve been actively practicing polyamorous relationships for about 5 years now and I’ve absolutely felt fulfilled in growing with multiple people in that time. Just remember ethically non-monogamy is NOT for everyone (and that’s okay!!) 😊

  • @angrytedtalks
    @angrytedtalks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Non monogamy. Ethical? I don't think the vast majority of human ancestry gave a stuff about the ethics. It has always been about the gratification, balanced with dominance and empathy. Some apes are matriarchal. Others have dominant males. We humans just blunder through relationships and procreation.

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, I mainly agree with this

    • @annahappen7036
      @annahappen7036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No kidding!!

    • @Jeeplee_rc
      @Jeeplee_rc ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ancient culture and civilization was not monogamous. Most animals are not monogamous. It's a very interesting topic

    • @seth5143
      @seth5143 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jeeplee_rc
      Slavery was also a worldwide institution for most of human history :)

  • @cardcode8345
    @cardcode8345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Best love language is “MONEY”

  • @ahmedismael6970
    @ahmedismael6970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have one question about monogamy
    It is which is a great numbers among femal &male in z world?

  • @christoph3187
    @christoph3187 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don’t buy the “choice” argument. Usually one side in a relationship has considerably more options and the other will become resentful over time - relationship killer. Also the whole point of a monogamous relationship and marriage is about securing a stable and safe environment to raise kids, so the whole screwing around and reducing certainty about the fatherhood while increasing health risks is an issue. Plus additional questions like why stick around and invest in a partner if they become sick or need other assistance need answering. Keep in mind s@x isn’t the only topic in a relationship.

  • @cheetavontiebolt9971
    @cheetavontiebolt9971 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Better ethical non managony then cheating

  • @GibsonWilson-y1o
    @GibsonWilson-y1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    McLaughlin Corner

  • @injetisrinivasarao966
    @injetisrinivasarao966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Never in your life complaint ......where have all the good men gone.

  • @lostindixie
    @lostindixie 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I know a happuly married couple where she has a boyfriend, he has a girlfriend, but without all this doublespeak.

  • @DefoePatrick-j4y
    @DefoePatrick-j4y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nora Garden

  • @BuckZephaniah-r1t
    @BuckZephaniah-r1t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glennie Islands

  • @marianavalenzuela2986
    @marianavalenzuela2986 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I resemble with everything she said except for the love languages part, we all like words of affirmation as much as physical love... love languages are irrelevant, we are all looking for the 5 parts.

    • @kanekane5216
      @kanekane5216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree love is just a chemical reaction fades away in 1 year.

    • @clairsentientrealm7203
      @clairsentientrealm7203 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kanekane5216 I feel very sad you believe that. You deserve better of yourself 💜

    • @eevalobo
      @eevalobo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      One dominates the most is usually what that refers to…not that the person is missing one or a few.

    • @ayanjoemusic
      @ayanjoemusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're kinda right on one part ; that we are looking for all 5 parts. But I think how it works is the degree to which you want specific things....
      I took the test and receiving gifts was the last love language. But it's not like i don't love getting gifts. It's just that I prefer quality time more than that, maybe not necessarily over that.

    • @ayanjoemusic
      @ayanjoemusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kanekane5216 you're right about the chemicals, and even the fading away, but that's just the feeling of love. The act of love requires effort to keep the wave flowing, make the chemical reactions in you happen again...to learn about the neurotransmitters and how to keep them going in a relationship, to trust the person vulnerably enough to build your own mental fortitude and faith in your own ability to love (as an action, not just riding a feeling), i guess.

  • @ElectraWanda-l2k
    @ElectraWanda-l2k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buckridge Manors

  • @CarrollRosie-d1y
    @CarrollRosie-d1y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Margaretta Common

  • @FaradayJacob
    @FaradayJacob 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5903 Kihn Plaza

  • @MaryOtoole-b9v
    @MaryOtoole-b9v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lily Street

  • @DevonIseman-j3h
    @DevonIseman-j3h 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Missouri Shore

  • @lotus8395
    @lotus8395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love this

  • @LayneGieger-k6i
    @LayneGieger-k6i 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ortiz Isle

  • @winnytaio9547
    @winnytaio9547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    One thing of this non-monogomus arrangement. Most men want it to be one sided. I can't see other people but he can.

    • @bobkloth57
      @bobkloth57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What’s stopping you? It’s easy for a woman to get a man. It’s just that the man might not be over 6 feet tall, make 6 figures, and have 6 pack abs.

    • @jizz1488
      @jizz1488 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said

    • @bobkloth57
      @bobkloth57 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jizz1488
      Thanks

    • @Dhuxul9
      @Dhuxul9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The man doesn’t own you so do what you want

  • @MattJohnson-y8v
    @MattJohnson-y8v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kunze Ridge

  • @kookle658
    @kookle658 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    So she sleeps with multiple people to avoid getting hurt and disappointed got it

  • @PowellMarlon-t5g
    @PowellMarlon-t5g 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lucius Cove

  • @blueberryPR
    @blueberryPR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Society will sooner or later stop imposing the ethics and religious beliefs from one section of society to others that need to get with the program.

  • @heisenberg3829
    @heisenberg3829 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bu benim neden keşfetimde?

  • @denisships2861
    @denisships2861 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Crux Saccra sit mihi lux! Non dracco sit mihi dux

  • @VokeVideo
    @VokeVideo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Id guess that monogamy will become the unusual choice by 2050

  • @mashal2567
    @mashal2567 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Something I can never understand. There is no relationship if it’s non monogamous… whoever says it is lying to themselves
    After listening to her I realized that she is just someone who was getting bad men in her life and she was basically convinced that there are no monogamy… and being raised in a family like that.
    Which makes me feel sorry for her.
    The truth is there are men and women who don’t cheat. And love each other.

    • @semperfi-1918
      @semperfi-1918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Non monogamous marriages have been around and successful as well for thousands of years. And yes a man can love more than one woman. Many cultures still practice this as well.

    • @lilyjones2368
      @lilyjones2368 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      You must have been really hurt at some point to be small minded enough to believe this. You don’t get to define other people’s relationships as valid or not 🙄 have a seat

    • @shivinunitholi2493
      @shivinunitholi2493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@lilyjones2368 have you have ever interacted with kids of "poly" folks ever. I have and I have known a case where this teenage son was totally disturbed when told that his mom had multiple partners.
      It's easy to preach poly relationship as normal but it really isn't and especially a difficult thing for kids of the ones who are into this kind of an arrangement. So I'd say you better have a seat.

    • @rogerledoux4741
      @rogerledoux4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@shivinunitholi2493 I agree, people don't consider the ramifications of these types of relationships. Here is an example so a woman has a relationship with 2 different men she becomes pregnant and she has no idea who the father is. What do you tell the kid, you have 2 daddy's. Now I understand today you can get a DNA TEST but not that long ago that was not possible. My understanding Is today as high as 5 to 30% of men are raising other men babies.

    • @ayanjoemusic
      @ayanjoemusic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shivinunitholi2493 could one case be a sample representative for the entire population of kids of poly folks?

  • @LuNuNic23
    @LuNuNic23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    URGENT THERAPY REQUIRED

  • @Prosanity0012
    @Prosanity0012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please don’t make it religious

  • @chorlauheung4920
    @chorlauheung4920 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What happened to the marriage covenant, between a husband and a wife!!

    • @Joseph-mm4zu
      @Joseph-mm4zu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I blame rock and roll music

    • @tonytostones
      @tonytostones 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It was built around the standard agricultural based household and most people aren't farmers anymore.

  • @ugleebuggs7597
    @ugleebuggs7597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    FFS.
    TEDx will allow absolutely anyone to speak these days 🤮🤮

  • @tashawaters89
    @tashawaters89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bravo

  • @whytarang2742
    @whytarang2742 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Healthy household

  • @user-xb2nk7en1r
    @user-xb2nk7en1r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keebler Club

  • @1Corinthians6Verses9thru11
    @1Corinthians6Verses9thru11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Sorry, but there is really no such thing as "ethical" non-monogamy; no matter how much some people might like this to be legitimized. ( Ie morality actually exists and is not merely a human construct that people can change based on their own personal likes and dislikes).

    • @henjoyner8788
      @henjoyner8788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Why is non-monogamy inherently immoral in your opinion?

    • @annahappen7036
      @annahappen7036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      You've not even begun a journey of self- awareness. You're basis for this statement is from the auto-pilot assumption that there actually is some kind of Supreme Moral authority i.e. a god of a chosen religion. Not everyone ascribes to such. Morality has been and always will be dependent on your own world view be it religious or not. I'm sorry friend but you're not everyone's moral authority nor is your god, or the god you got your auto pilot default ethics from.

    • @shivinunitholi2493
      @shivinunitholi2493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@annahappen7036 I'm not trying to get religion here but what you imply is there's nothing ethical and nothing moral. In that which case you're endorsing the "anyone can get laid with anyone" idea, is it.

    • @gigifabozzi5433
      @gigifabozzi5433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@henjoyner8788 because monogamy is the basis of society, without monogamy societies can't exist, and if something is a danger to society then its, by definition, unethical.

    • @antoinethename9064
      @antoinethename9064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@shivinunitholi2493 they very much did not say that. If anything they said that there is no *objective* morality/ethics.

  • @johnharris73
    @johnharris73 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    What the heck is she talking about? This is what atheistic parenting gets you? This sounds like utter confusion to me. I’m glad that her talk was not the classic perfect sounding TED TALK. She was genuine in that way though I don’t agree with much of what she said. And that’s all good. This is her life and life is about choices, right or wrong.

    • @MirandaAutumn
      @MirandaAutumn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      And who are you to tell another whether their choices are right or wrong?

    • @maxbarkdull875
      @maxbarkdull875 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr. Hyde was more coherent

  • @JohnGarcia-i5n
    @JohnGarcia-i5n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Vergie Shore

  • @Buddahabrot
    @Buddahabrot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I find it quite remarkable, how often her words rhyme, seems somewhat unnatural.
    That kind of performance reminds me of SINGING, that is mostly about false fantasies, those love songs barely reflect reality.
    Now, why does she apply this interesting technique? Could it perhaps be, that she actually, doesn't believe her song. I just know that something is wrong.

  • @officialffspodcast
    @officialffspodcast ปีที่แล้ว

    👏 👏 👏

  • @dainbulldog1
    @dainbulldog1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I am so sorry. It sounds like you’ve reverted to open relationships because of hurt of men that you chose, and play it off as if the men you chose are solely responsible for the havoc in your life. You chose them.

  • @JohnnyJackson746
    @JohnnyJackson746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anything about polygamy is getting ignored

  • @oscarcuevas7579
    @oscarcuevas7579 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I just wasted 8 minutes of my Life. Couldn't watch all the way... She made no sense for 8 minutes straight....

  • @blobbowo
    @blobbowo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    4th?

  • @pardesipunjabi1493
    @pardesipunjabi1493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Such relationships are for insecure and for people who lack ability to commit.

    • @thealchemist6994
      @thealchemist6994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      i agree with you!!! Non Monogamy is like sleeping with your woman, whom had slept with another man a few hours ago, and another man a day ago, and another one the other day and the neighbor's husband last weekend. I see non monogamy like that of an open relationship. Where are the feelings then??

    • @A_Sen_0
      @A_Sen_0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thealchemist6994
      😂
      What if i tell u shhe only have one man other than me . & i m ok with hr sleeeping with him

    • @Breakfast_Time-r3c
      @Breakfast_Time-r3c 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@A_Sen_0 good for you cuck

  • @envoltaemla6652
    @envoltaemla6652 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    non-monogamy only exists out of egoism and a lack of interest in the other, otherwise people would'nt try to find a 2nd or 3rd person to give them what they want just like that. ethical.... fhfdsh

    • @joshuahoward2595
      @joshuahoward2595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Well that's just like... Your opinion, man.

    • @faryaltalsam740
      @faryaltalsam740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @nevenomar I totally agree with you

    • @dfjr1990
      @dfjr1990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you in a monogamous relationship?

  • @christianbateman2
    @christianbateman2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Absolute mess

    • @ebut333uoy
      @ebut333uoy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What?

  • @nsolcis
    @nsolcis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    this is terrible for kids.

  • @Godhead111
    @Godhead111 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    All people who are defending this have never experienced real love. If you find the right person, the idea of touching someone else disgusts you and makes you sick to your stomach. If that's not the case then you are far from understanding what love is.

    • @A_Sen_0
      @A_Sen_0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That type of possessiveness goes away after 10-20 years of relationship😅
      Its totally fine to be non monogamous, i have seen many such couples.
      They have stronger bond

    • @Godhead111
      @Godhead111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@A_Sen_0 It's so sad that you mistake love for possessiveness. This is a trauma response, you got a bad heartbreak in the past so now you're gaslighting yourself into thinking real love is "possessive"

    • @A_Sen_0
      @A_Sen_0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Godhead111
      I never had any heartbreaks lol.
      U said “if someone is not disgusted in the idea of touching someone else disgust u then itz not true love” on that context i said possessiveness.
      I said in decade long relationship , many couples don’t have such reactions anymore
      & i have seen way more honesty , strong bond among such couples

    • @Godhead111
      @Godhead111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@A_Sen_0 Monogamy is human nature. We are not like other apes, even if we are apes, we are far beyond others. Monogamy is one of the things that makes us Human. Modern liberals are enjoying the luxuries built by yesterday's conservatives. Nothing good comes out of non mongamy. It reflects on every other aspect of life.

    • @A_Sen_0
      @A_Sen_0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Godhead111
      I think u don’t understand ethical non monogamy
      Let me give u an example.
      A couple maried or had civil partnership agreement & started cohabitation had a kid
      After 7 years reaaltionship turns afffectionless , distant.
      One partner is suffocating lets say in segs less marage.
      Then they both decided to take one long term partner
      Thats it
      This way their marage got saved & they rased the kid as a best friends.
      What benefits would have arrised if one partner would have become separated or dvorces to get into a new relationship ?

  • @christianbennett1810
    @christianbennett1810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This is heartbreaking for a child to go through, it's confusing for them and it messes up marriage for them, polyamorous is not the way to go, that is not a healthy construct to go by

    • @timiadebayo8154
      @timiadebayo8154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Why? She doesn't seem confused. If anything she's empowered. She has been given all the options and SHE, not her parents...not you, SHE has decided what she needs to be healthy.

    • @cesruhf2605
      @cesruhf2605 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@timiadebayo8154 she seems high

  • @linuxbasic3399
    @linuxbasic3399 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    for non monogamy promotion you have seriously monotonous presentation... school monologues are better than this...

    • @dropsika438
      @dropsika438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :)) So funny! and so true!

  • @LongShawley-e2z
    @LongShawley-e2z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Paucek Mews

  • @HkFinn83
    @HkFinn83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why is it always decently attractive/normal women with obviously below average guys?

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I don't think that's always the case

    • @dsciulli
      @dsciulli 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is with me lol I’m not obviously below average but I’ve always had the confidence and ability to date what others would be afraid too.

    • @mateuszg6042
      @mateuszg6042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They are with the below average to make sure he'll stay with them and raise their kids. They cheat on them with the good looking ones. I'm the good looking one and can confirm.

    • @HkFinn83
      @HkFinn83 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mateuszg6042 you think that an average woman has numerous below average boyfriends in case one day she has kids and needs childcare? That’s...certainly a theory you have there fella😂😂

    • @gigifabozzi5433
      @gigifabozzi5433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because those below average guys commit while she bangs the guys she likes but that don't commit to her

  • @walmartramen
    @walmartramen ปีที่แล้ว

    "Humans are now mostly monogamous, but this has been the norm for just the past 1,000 years." These days it's ok for a woman to have a concubine since things seem so reversed!

  • @Breakfast_Time-r3c
    @Breakfast_Time-r3c 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This polygrooming is so bad. What is wrong with you...

  • @johnrencheck2283
    @johnrencheck2283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Non manogamy itself in a relationship is not ethical u believe this cause mommy was a single parent with no ethics thus marrying into an open relationship and telling u its ok to be UNETHICAL just like mommy and new daddy im betting mommy had many side men,unethical hun

    • @vivianech1
      @vivianech1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh yes it is. You don’t know what you’re talking about

  • @FieldUlysses
    @FieldUlysses 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    34959 Mariane Dam

  • @olanhogan5464
    @olanhogan5464 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Siynds pretty unethical to ne.