We need to create laws that protect people, but do not cause limitations on personal growth. For example, I lived in a home where there were so many restrictions that it prevented my personal growth and kept me from improving myself. Now this is a metaphor for a nation: Promote the arts, trade, industry, science, and philosophy. But protect people, particularly from the abuse of power and from foreign abusers.
It's rules made by the officials of the government to control their people whilst the official's break the laws that they have made for their own financial gains, control, and power!
If the contract after the divorce is challenged by one of the spouses, another situation arises: the family law contains the opportunity to apply to the court with an appropriate claim, but this does not exclude the application of the Civil Code rules on how to protect the partners of the relevant legal relations. The sixty-fifth article alone is simply not capable of exhaustively settling the structure of such protection, but, on the contrary, it can be used for abuse in divorce. It often happens when one sues the invalidation of a contract, in order to impose an appropriate arrest. For example, when a husband signs a loan or a suretyship agreement, to satisfy their conditions, a claim is made for their invalidity on the basis of ignorance. The highest specialized court finally indicated that the recovery of loans does not extend to the consent of the wife. Of course, there is no discernment between the presumption of awareness and agreement of the agreement, which is concluded by the husband, and on such grounds of lack of consent the whole transaction is disputed. advokat-kiev-maksimovv.kiev.ua/semejnyij-advokat/
"The law lives in the conscience of the people. If the people have no conscience there can be no law." What a perfect explanation for the trump phenomena.
trump enforced the existing immigration laws and was crucified. when we dont like our laws we get mad when theyre enforced. enforcing laws only sometimes leads to favoritism and popularity tests. altho im not well researched on policy, it takes a lot of time. i heard about the family separation at border, it sounds terrible. so i researched it and read a bunch of articles with different viewpoints. when someone is jailed theyre kids dont go to jail with them, theres a court ruling on this and i agree. the only way to not separate families is to not enforce the law, to release families on a promise to appear, and i believe theres special low security facilities to hold them together. the problem is immigrants start smuggling kids up here as human shields and it encourages kidnapping and exploitation. sometimes a little cruelty prevents a lot of cruelty. tough call. i respect border jumpers and i respect the law and its enforcers.
as long as boundaries are set. sociopaths sense low boundaries and predate on nice people. our value (love) for ourself and others motivates us to do the right thing. love informs our will. im agreeing, as long as we can include tough love 💪ps, you put me in a good mood.
I support the mission to support the "rule of law" throughout the world but we need to be introspective as a nation and assess whether we truly are as free as we consider ourselves to be. What about instance of police brutality that happen everyday in our nation, yet never reported as wrongful because some people think "that is just the way things are." We must also enforce our "rule of law" to ensure that we are not just living in a land of illusory freedom.
Hardly anywhere has rule of law- the requirements are that rules be clear and easy to understand which is certainly nowhere in the Western World- just for instance the US doesn't know how many laws it has.
when hillary ran for president it was first time i seriously exposed myself to conservative views (im in a blue state). now i possess great arguments from each side and know the policy questions better. hillary changed my life, and all she had to do is kill 100 people. totally worth it, from my point of view. shes mean, including to secret service. gary byrne v=09a29aRfKzE
We need help in México, the rule of law is being broken, we are being harassed for speaking on behalf of human rights, the Government is doing so trough the people they finance, and they spy and arrange all kinds of harassment to destroy us, they want to kill us.
The idea of the rule of law comes from Hobbes then it's further developed by Locke. It is true that countries that abide by the rule of law develop themselves economically and politically. That's why no matter how much aid the US gives to African countries, these would not develop if they lack the fundamental institutions that were born in Britain after the glorious revolution. The US just inherited those institutions.
Gusty17 If the USA is so well "inherited" why is it breaking so many International Laws? The Guantanamo US prison is a clear violation of the most basic human rights. Today there are close to a hundred people the very US Supreme Court has declared innocent and free to go, but are still languishing there!!! The Guantanamo base has overstayed its lease and refuses to move off the Island. The biggest bully world criminal, is the US oligarchy that runs the country.
etniks International Law is different from national law in the US. In countries like the Netherlands, Japan, Germany or Mexico, Internatinal law is more important than national law since their constitutions say so. But the US and the UK respect their own laws more than international law due to diverse reasons. One is that international law is based in continental europe laws (the continental system). 2.- Great Powers can bend international law to their favor or they can choose to ignore part of it, since there is nobody who would enforce it to them.
The Rule of Law is not what you ant because you don't make the law. IN fact, you've never made any law. And nobody you know probably has ever made any law. Is the Rule of Law all that just then, or desirable, or to be aspired to. No. Better than fascism and a dictorship.. or is it. Instead of the tyranny of one capricious person, you have a tyramny of rules you have no input on.
This is a terrible explanation that attemps to answer the question but only partially, instead of answering the question concisely it ends up trying to catch its own tail like a Dog
Who els is here because of class
Me
me xD
I’m here cuz of my boyfriend I’m doing his work lmfao 😹
Army Taetae don’t he’s work
Lol me
Am here for a class
who else is watching this on a live call w their class together 💀
We need to create laws that protect people, but do not cause limitations on personal growth. For example, I lived in a home where there were so many restrictions that it prevented my personal growth and kept me from improving myself. Now this is a metaphor for a nation: Promote the arts, trade, industry, science, and philosophy. But protect people, particularly from the abuse of power and from foreign abusers.
By "not respecting the rule of law" you mean, like guantanamo and many other extra-territorial U.S. military bases??
"in countries where the rule of law is absent people don't have access to the justice system" oh u mean like the USA?
🤣🤣🤣 Exactly
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 then what is bill of rights
This was a direct and good presentation of RULE OF LAW.
It's rules made by the officials of the government to control their people whilst the official's break the laws that they have made for their own financial gains, control, and power!
What is the public thing?
I am here because of school to
If the contract after the divorce is challenged by one of the spouses, another situation arises: the family law contains the opportunity to apply to the court with an appropriate claim, but this does not exclude the application of the Civil Code rules on how to protect the partners of the relevant legal relations. The sixty-fifth article alone is simply not capable of exhaustively settling the structure of such protection, but, on the contrary, it can be used for abuse in divorce.
It often happens when one sues the invalidation of a contract, in order to impose an appropriate arrest. For example, when a husband signs a loan or a suretyship agreement, to satisfy their conditions, a claim is made for their invalidity on the basis of ignorance. The highest specialized court finally indicated that the recovery of loans does not extend to the consent of the wife. Of course, there is no discernment between the presumption of awareness and agreement of the agreement, which is concluded by the husband, and on such grounds of lack of consent the whole transaction is disputed.
advokat-kiev-maksimovv.kiev.ua/semejnyij-advokat/
who else was told to watch it for there teachers homework
"The law lives in the conscience of the people. If the people have no conscience there can be no law."
What a perfect explanation for the trump phenomena.
trump enforced the existing immigration laws and was crucified. when we dont like our laws we get mad when theyre enforced. enforcing laws only sometimes leads to favoritism and popularity tests. altho im not well researched on policy, it takes a lot of time. i heard about the family separation at border, it sounds terrible. so i researched it and read a bunch of articles with different viewpoints. when someone is jailed theyre kids dont go to jail with them, theres a court ruling on this and i agree. the only way to not separate families is to not enforce the law, to release families on a promise to appear, and i believe theres special low security facilities to hold them together. the problem is immigrants start smuggling kids up here as human shields and it encourages kidnapping and exploitation. sometimes a little cruelty prevents a lot of cruelty. tough call. i respect border jumpers and i respect the law and its enforcers.
LIFE IS TO LOVE AND TO BE LOVED 💕 LOVE ALONE CAN CONQUER THE WORLD
as long as boundaries are set. sociopaths sense low boundaries and predate on nice people. our value (love) for ourself and others motivates us to do the right thing. love informs our will. im agreeing, as long as we can include tough love 💪ps, you put me in a good mood.
2021 n im still here😀💀
I support the mission to support the "rule of law" throughout the world but we need to be introspective as a nation and assess whether we truly are as free as we consider ourselves to be. What about instance of police brutality that happen everyday in our nation, yet never reported as wrongful because some people think "that is just the way things are." We must also enforce our "rule of law" to ensure that we are not just living in a land of illusory freedom.
And in the real world we have the Ethan Couch case.
Thank you so much for this video❤️
let's see if there is rule of law is in US.
l didn't understand
The rule of law protects men. The law of the jungle protects their young from predators.
Anyone else her because of class?
Thanks
Nice
Hardly anywhere has rule of law- the requirements are that rules be clear and easy to understand which is certainly nowhere in the Western World- just for instance the US doesn't know how many laws it has.
shows war criminal HILARY CLINTON in their video (laughing)
when hillary ran for president it was first time i seriously exposed myself to conservative views (im in a blue state). now i possess great arguments from each side and know the policy questions better. hillary changed my life, and all she had to do is kill 100 people. totally worth it, from my point of view. shes mean, including to secret service. gary byrne v=09a29aRfKzE
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
How it can realized
We need help in México, the rule of law is being broken, we are being harassed for speaking on behalf of human rights, the Government is doing so trough the people they finance, and they spy and arrange all kinds of harassment to destroy us, they want to kill us.
The idea of the rule of law comes from Hobbes then it's further developed by Locke. It is true that countries that abide by the rule of law develop themselves economically and politically. That's why no matter how much aid the US gives to African countries, these would not develop if they lack the fundamental institutions that were born in Britain after the glorious revolution. The US just inherited those institutions.
Gusty17 If the USA is so well "inherited" why is it breaking so many International Laws? The Guantanamo US prison is a clear violation of the most basic human rights. Today there are close to a hundred people the very US Supreme Court has declared innocent and free to go, but are still languishing there!!!
The Guantanamo base has overstayed its lease and refuses to move off the Island.
The biggest bully world criminal, is the US oligarchy that runs the country.
etniks
International Law is different from national law in the US. In countries like the Netherlands, Japan, Germany or Mexico, Internatinal law is more important than national law since their constitutions say so. But the US and the UK respect their own laws more than international law due to diverse reasons. One is that international law is based in continental europe laws (the continental system). 2.- Great Powers can bend international law to their favor or they can choose to ignore part of it, since there is nobody who would enforce it to them.
Gusty17 what does "republic" mean? What is the public thing?
Gusty17 is there "rule of law" in a democracy? If the 51% ruled the 49% in a democracy where is the law?
Gusty17 do oligarchies have rule of law? Oligarchies have people who are immune to the law. I don't believe oligarchies have a rule of law.
nice
@UClf4VHUJrXmjPcegdVbH_QA no cause funni
I'm here
Bra I got a quiz
So boring 👎
to have law, you needed to have god. Do you obey god? Do we still need god today?
This is NOT an explanation of the rule of law, just social justice BS.
suuuuupppppeeeeerrrrr
Whoopsie.......
The Rule of Law is not what you ant
because you don't make the law.
IN fact, you've never made any law.
And nobody you know probably has ever made any law.
Is the Rule of Law all that just then, or desirable, or to be aspired to. No.
Better than fascism and a dictorship.. or is it.
Instead of the tyranny of one capricious person, you have a tyramny of rules you have no input on.
law of the jungle vs jungle of laws.
Bro
librullz....lmao
'When everybody is free to say what they want..' Yeah sure, try saying something lefties don't like and you will be 'canceled'.
This is a terrible explanation that attemps to answer the question but only partially, instead of answering the question concisely it ends up trying to catch its own tail like a Dog
It seems there is no rule of law for an enemy
Rule of Law us the Holy Quran