Say hello to James, our new narrator (his links in the description)! I fired the old narrator because he sounded too much like George Soros, and he din't even like the job too much. Plus this might increase productivity, and who knows, maybe catch the eye (or ear) of the algorithm... Oh and I didn't even mention the new-new visuals!
The new visuals are great! Regarding the narrator, the old narrator was not the best, but he had a very clear voice and was pleasant to listen to. No offence, but this new guy sounds like he is drooling all the time. I really don't like it...
Yeah dude idk about this new narrator, he just doesn’t have that deep weathered voice that history narrators need to sound super based. He is like 4/10 at best sorry man. Still though thanks for posting
Respect For Hungarian Hero In Albania Is Well Known & Respected He Was a Real Friend Of George Kastrioti Scanderbeg And Friend Of Albania. With Love & Respect From Albania To Our Friends In Hungary. 🇭🇺🇦🇱🇭🇺🇦🇱
@@SoldierOfChristAlmighty what does it mean Wat happened to skanderberg? the Albanians were the only Europeans to defeat the Ottomans like no other European army in the entire Ottoman history ...and also fighting on two fronts against an Ottoman-Venetian alliance
"Janissaries began as elite corps made up through the devşirme system of child slavery, by which young Christian boys, notably Armenians, Albanians, Bosnians, Bulgarians, Croats, Greeks and Serbs, were taken from the Balkans, enslaved and converted to Islam, and incorporated into the Ottoman army".
@@cjclark2002Hayır,Zekice,en aznindan koleleri kullanmanin en iyi yolu€,ustelik kole cocuklar hicbirseyin farkinda degil ve bu yuzden islami hemen benimsiyorlar
Tips to use you hungarian army : scream < Attack ! > with Hunyadi's voice, *every Hungarian unit in a 10 miles radius gets +10 in morale and strength* .
I know life would be pretty hard and rough to adjust to, but I would kill to travel back to that time, just to have the chance to serve/fight and most likely die for a true example of an incredible and brilliant man such as him.
The same nobility class that abamdoned him, were the same ones that abandoned Konstantinople, and made a deal with the Sultan they would not help Byzantium as long as the Sultan promised to leave them alone and let them keep their lands!
What in old hungarian language means: "bulgar-white castle" ..because the Byzantian empire took from bulgars back...than the hungarians took from Byzant. Like wedding gift goes to Serbia. When Georg Brankovits can not hold more against the ottomans, give on Hunyadi and took for this many hungarian village and castle,s. So goes back to Hungary for ca 100 years. The serbian people always called them : Belo-grad...the "White Castle" 😉
I think you forgot to mention that the disaster at the battle of Varna was the result of great pressure by legate Cesarini and pro-war faction on king Vladislaus. The treaty was violated about a week after its ratification.
I want to see more about the Ottomans. The Battle of Mohacs is a must. Maybe some videos about the expansion into the Mediterranean too? The great siege of Malta? That'd be cool.
Optimistic about the new narrator but he sounds almost like a newscaster at times and I did prefer the previous guy's slightly understated style. Best of luck with your future endeavors.
I hope I’m not too rude by insisting on this, but the whole tone of the video has changed. Your unidentifiable accent, the serene music and your gravitas of voice made for an calm, allof experience that befits the times of old. There was both a sort of detachment and a contemplation of tragedy. There was some repetitive intonation, I guess because these are long scripts. The new experience is more epic, demands more excitement and thus seems more like the other simmilar channels. Best of luck.
The guys who seem to win are the ones who withdraw before they are not annihilated but upon realizing the disadvantage. That way they can sustain war for long and win the attrition warfare. Only thing they need to maintain permanently is the integrity of their core intention.
Hey there, a really great video again and it was a bliss to watch it. I must admit that the new narrator, for me atleast, is a much better choice than the previous one was. Keep up the good work and I hope soon this channel gets picked up by the algorithym 😉😉
@Cypher Just as you Romanians are not Dacians, there is no proof that you guys are Dacians, but Latinised Slavs. And Hungarians have genetic proof that we are indeed the descendants of the Huns.
You have done an excellent job of following and keeping clear all the tangled threads of intrigue and military campaigns. But couldn't you have taken the little time to learn that Magyar words and names are accented on the FIRST syllable?!
that would be awesome, i would love if they actually spoke hungarian, czech, old german and so on in the game with english subtitles to the lines you have in-game language proficiency for. kinda like in kingdom come 1 but going all in with it instead of making half the game authentic and the czech half basically british english.
I have got a question. Do you think if Hunyadi and Skenderbeg would have made it to link up, do you think they would have won the 2nd battle of Kosova and also do you think they could have managed to advance even further into the empire?
@@szeklergeneral4266 skenderbeg used guerilla tactic. He didnt had the balls to confront ottoman army. Out of albanian land ottomans would crush them.
@@subutaykhan9387 Scanderbeg fought all kinds of wars not only guerilla tactic...and unlike the little sultans who remain hidden in tents, he participated in all wars as a commander and as a simple warrior
@@subutaykhan9387 without forgetting that half of the Scanderbeg battles were fought outside today's Albania In Ottoman territory ..he also fought on two fronts and defeated a Venetian-Ottoman coalition...he also carried out a military campaign in Italy as always he won there too ...no sultan had the balls to personally go into battle against Scanderbeg....they brought their huge armies to Albania but did not enter into battle personally then when they saw that their armies were being halved they fled
The hypocritical kings of Europe, the kings of Hungary, imprisoned Vlad and cooperated with the Ottomans. Why is it because the Ottomans are good and Vlad is evil?
Don't know how to break it to you (or him), but I don't like the new narrator at all. You enunciated better and... well I don't like to say this, but he sounds like a GPS. Also, it might just be my shitty headset, but the mic seems to saturate at times. Incredibly sorry for the mean comment.
Orthodox under Murad-II: ( Around 1443 AD under Ottoman Sultan Murad-II period ) " On all sides ( Pope's allies at Northen Balkan, sharing Ottoman border) there were uprisings against the Ottoman overlords and soon the Turkish garrisons were driven from a number of important castles and fortresses. But it should not be supposed that the Balkan peoples joined in common revolt against Ottoman rule. By prompt payment of the ' harac', the tribute always imposed on them, the Christians of the conquered countries purchase the right to live unmolested in their faith and to maintain their customs and many of their institutions.......Those who paid their taxes fully and punctually enjoyed a life scarcely different from that of pre-Ottoman ( Roman or Byzantine) times. Such, at least, was the case in the fifteenth century. It was only much later that bribery, extortion, blackmail, and usury made their appearance in the Ottoman provinces, that the officials, often spurred by insatiable greed, began to suck the blood of the population, and that all life was poisoned by deception and distrust. But this was in the decadence of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; conditions were very different under Murad II, who, as we have noted, was respected even among his adversaries for his sense of justice. Thus it was not so much the people who rebelled against the new masters ( muslims) as the would-be rulers, who feared for their lands as well as for those privileges and liberties which they still retained." Book: Mehmed the Conqueror and his time Author: Franz Babinger Edited: William C Hickman Translator: Ralph Manheim Edition: 1959 Page: 26,27
Just cant figure how Jan Žižka could possible participate on that, he was dead by that time :D Died 1424 and and last 5years before he was kinda busy with repelling crusade that was called on Bohemia :D Probably adding more year marks to the video would made that clear... Although few years after Žižka passed away hussites fell into civil war which ended with victory of conservative husites which wanted peace and in upcoming years, V. Jagello managed to be crowned as Bohemian King which lead to ceasefire with Pope and Sigmund. It was after then that hussite mercenaries became famous in Europe. I jsut dont think your mention of J. Žižka is on point.
Pl read this history ; ( i ). " The main reason for Ottaman success , however , was the development of stable and permanent institutions of government that transformed a tribal polity into a workable state ". ( ii ) " The Ottamans utilized all human resources in their emirate and quickly learned skills in bureaucracy and diplomacy ........ They also did not slaughter every Christian in their path ; rather , they encouraged the Christian inhabitants of the countryside and the towns to join them . Islamic law and tradition declared that enemies who surrendered on demand should be treated with tolerance . ( iii ). " The Christians of Bithynia were obliged to pay the ' harac ' , or capitation tax , for the privilege of being tolerated , but this was no more burdensome than the taxes they had paid to the Byzantine government , which had neglected their interests . Once they had made the decision to surrender or defect , the Byzantine population resigned to their fate ". " Some Christians converted to Islam upon joining the Ottamans ; however, this was not demanded . Many local Christians even participated in Ottaman raids against Byzantium ". BOOK : Encyclopaedia of the Ottoman Empire . AUTHOR : Gabor Agoston and Bruce Masters . Edition : 2009 page -109 . "Existing sources , such as the 25th century Ottoman census records , suggest that the earliest converts to Islam in the Balkans came from the ranks of the Balkan nobility and military elite that could supply the Ottomans with the manpower ............. BOOK : Encyclopaedia of the Ottoman Empire . AUTHOR : Gabor Agoston and Bruce Masters . Edition : 2009 page -146 .
So you mean he was the byzantian emperor? Just because back then the byzantines called themselves romanians. If not I am interested which country did he rule?
Can't know how I bumped onto this. All in all Damn good video 🥇😎. I also watched those rather similar from mStarTutorials and kinda wonder how you guys create these vids. MSTAR TUTORIALS also had cool information about similiar things on his channel.
Peace lover, Ottoman Sultan Murad - II. We have already noted that not only the Ottoman but also the Byzantine chroniclers accord the highest praise to the justice and mildness, honesty and forthrightness of Murad II, to mention only the principal traits of his character. Occasionally this emphasis on the bright side of the sultan's nature has been explained as an effort to paint as dark a picture as possible of his successor, destroyer of the remnant of the Byzantine Empire. But when we examine these historians' words more closely, we see that they were meant in all sincerity. "Sultan Murad," observes Chalcocondylas ( Contemporary historian ), for example, "was a man who loved law and justice and had fortune on his side. He waged war only in self-defense. He attacked no one unjustly. But when he was attacked by others he took up arms. If no one provoked him, he took no pleasure in campaigns, but the reason for this is not to be sought in laziness. For when it was necessary to defend his empire, he did not fear to set out even in winter, nor did he measure the dangers and difficulties attending his undertakings." Ducas( contemporary historian ), probably the most reliable of the Byzantine annalists, said to be a man enamored of the truth, gives special emphasis, in his judgment of Murad II, to the loyalty with which the sultan observed his treaties with the Christian powers, and stigmatizes the failure of the Christians always to exhibit the same virtue, as exemplified by their breach of the peace of Szeged. "Murad kept his given word,'' writes Ducas, "and not only to those of his own people and faith, for he never violated the treaties he had concluded with the Christians; when the Christians transgressed against the treaties and broke their given word, this did not escape the eye of God, which sees the truth. His just punishment befell them. But His wrath was not long lived, for the barbarian did not follow up his victories. He did not desire the total destruction of any people. And when the defeated sent envoys to sue for peace, he gave them a friendly reception, granted their plea, laid down the sword, and went the ways of peace. For this reason also the Father of Peace granted him to die in peace and not by the violence of the sword." Book: Mehmet the Conqueror and his time Edited: William C Hickman Translator: Ralph Manheim Edition: 1959 Page: 61,62
People of Turkey should realize their own history and knowledge that they are not Turks (Central Asians) but actually mix of Greek/Europeans and Middle Easterners...
Principal component analysis of more than 500,000 SNP genotypes reveals significant overlap between present-day Turks and Middle Easterners and a relationship with Europeans and South and Central Asians. According to this study, the genetic ancestry of Turks is 38% European, 35% Middle Eastern, 18% South Asian and 9% Central Asian.This means that the vast majority of the Turkish population does not descend from Turks (a small part only 9%)
Iancu de Hunddoara was the son of the Romanian small nobleman Voicu and of Elizabeth (possible descendent of the byzantine aristocracy).Romanians do not have a problem with his origin , Hungarians have, so Hungarian nationalist propaganda invented that he was the son of Sigismund. Because accepting the reality of a romanian origin for the golden age Hungarian king Matei Corvinul is unbearable for most contemporary Hungarian nationalist propaganda.
Nobody thinks here in Hungary that his father was Sigismund, it was a legend in the time of his son Matthias. János's fathers origin is obviusly cuman, his name "Voicu" is the romanized form of hungarian/cuman name Vajk/Vayk which is a pagan name and it was literally the pagan name of our first king Saint Stephen. And the mother of János was Morzsinai Erzsébet (Elizabeth) and she was from a Transylvanian noble family of moldovan/wallachian descent, but the family got its nobility in the 1200s from king IV. Béla and the family got hungarised overtime. Plus the Hunyadi family's DNA is literally proven that its like 70% cuman and you can't change biological facts.
@@balentinus Brother, it's historically accepted nowadays that the Corvin/Hunyadi family were founded by Voicu who was indisputably a Wallachian/Romanian nobleman. There's nobody of importance who claims he was Cuman, much less any DNA testing being done to prove it.
@@jozefdobrovodsky2932 Moldova and Wallachia were founded by leftovers of the Golden Horde (Besarab for example) and cumans. They were the nobles of these principalities because vlachs didn't care and didn't know how to create a state, and didn't even lived in cities thats why the romanian word for city comes from hungarian. These noble families got romanized in the 15th-16th century. The dna test of the hunyadi family was done by croatian and hungarian scientist in 2021, where they they took dna test of Corvin János son of Matthias and the from the son of Corvin János who is Corvin Christopher, they are both burried in the church of the croatian city of Lepoglava.
@@balentinus Provide a source for your claims of the DNA testing, I have heard of no such things. The only thing I found while looking it up is that the Hungarian government asked for DNA testing to be stopped because "it wasn't needed"... Also, from a little research and asking around, it seems the Romanians also use the word "cetate" for city which seems to be derived directly from latin... I don't know what's with the Hungarian claim for their words but I think Romanians know their language better than Hungarians, just saying. Also if you say that Wallachia and Moldavia were formed by the remanants of the Golden Horde then I don't think we can have a historical discussion of any kind, you would be completely oblivious to the topic. No European state was formed by mongolians, this is just a Hungarian nationalist Turanist obsession with trying to claim that they are somehow related to steppe nomads while also trying to claim they are European. You say every country in Europe was formed by Cumans/Mongols/Kipachs/Sarmatians which is just pure schizophrenia. Claiming that the Hunyadis were of Wallachian origin is the same thing as saying they were Romanian, in the same way the Habsburgs who ruled over Hungary were Austrians, not Hungarians.... Both the above statements are true, the Hunyadis were Wallachians/Romanians and the Habsburgs were Austrians. I don't know how you say the Hunyadis were Romanianised by the Romanians in the 15th century when nationalism didn't exist at the time.
@@peter-df6wl Yes. No doubt. Even the Hungarian documents before he rose in politics named him "John the Romanian" (”Iohannes Olah”). He was named also "the white knight of Walachia" etc.
@@ionbrad6753 Ah Ok! I didn't realised that was my questions. But back then was no Romania. Hire doesn't say he was Romanian? "János Hunyadi, English John Hunyadi or John Huniades, (born 1407?, Hunyad, Transylvania-died August 11,1456, Belgrade), Hungarian general " Some others saying! "Hunyadi János, also known as John Hunyadi, was of Romanian origin. He was born in the Kingdom of Hungary, which at the time included parts of modern-day Romania. He was a prominent military leader and statesman during the 15th century, and played an important role in defending Hungary against the Ottoman Empire." You have some GREAT voivodes in your history, like Mircea the Older, Stephen the Great (very appreciated by Hungarians I ), Vlad Tepes (Dracula), Ion Voda cel Viteaz, Radu de la Afumați or Constantin Brâncoveanu. So way you saying he was Romanian? Whay is that so important for Romanian to say he was Romanian. Apparently his Father was Wallachian mother was Hungarian and hi was born in Hungary. So how that make him Romanian ?
It was just a matter of time. There were few empires wealthier than the Ottoman empire at the time. Hungary was going to fall eventually. Their only realistic chance was going to a diplomatic one, too bad they couldn't come to terms considering Hungarians and Turks share common ancient roots. They're like distant brothers.
He was never a Hungarian...but a Romanian. His full name was Iancu de Hunedoara. Hunyadi is the Magyarization of his name. His army was formed by Romanians, Székelys and Magyars.
With his hazardous campanies, Hunyady distroied the core of the low and middle nobility of wallachians, serbians, hungarians and bosnians and loose every chase of expel the Ottomans Turks outside Europe. With his volatile politics, The "Great" Matheus King, his son, distroyed Hungary in less then 20 years after his death
"The silence that overtook the room did not cow him, either, as he stared down the generals and diplomats gathered there who knew not what to say at such a proposal. Even the bold Hungarian warrior of Wallachian blood, John Hunyadi, felt the tension. He and his fellows were not convinced and shifted uncomfortably as John Capistrano awaited their response. The only man who seemed cool under the heated call to arms was one who some doubted was a man at all. Another of Wallachian descent, he sat still as a statue, eyes smoldering beneath his princely headgear and his tremendous moustache concealing any sign from his mouth. Vlad Dracul, called the Impaler, was listening, recognizing something in this wiry, hollow-cheeked old priest that matched the fanaticism and ferocity of the Turks. Dracul’s eyes met Hunyadi’s. Thus began the unlikely alliance among a saint, a soldier, and a vampire." www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/dracula-joins-john-capistrano-in-war-at-belgrade
Orthodox under Murad-II: ( Around 1443 AD under Ottoman Sultan Murad-II period ) " On all sides ( Pope's allies at Northen Balkan, sharing Ottoman border) there were uprisings against the Ottoman overlords and soon the Turkish garrisons were driven from a number of important castles and fortresses. But it should not be supposed that the Balkan peoples joined in common revolt against Ottoman rule. By prompt payment of the ' harac', the tribute always imposed on them, the Christians of the conquered countries purchase the right to live unmolested in their faith and to maintain their customs and many of their institutions.......Those who paid their taxes fully and punctually enjoyed a life scarcely different from that of pre-Ottoman ( Roman or Byzantine) times. Such, at least, was the case in the fifteenth century. It was only much later that bribery, extortion, blackmail, and usury made their appearance in the Ottoman provinces, that the officials, often spurred by insatiable greed, began to suck the blood of the population, and that all life was poisoned by deception and distrust. But this was in the decadence of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; conditions were very different under Murad II, who, as we have noted, was respected even among his adversaries for his sense of justice. Thus it was not so much the people who rebelled against the new masters ( muslims) as the would-be rulers, who feared for their lands as well as for those privileges and liberties which they still retained." Book: Mehmed the Conqueror and his time Author: Franz Babinger Edited: William C Hickman Translator: Ralph Manheim Edition: 1959 Page: 26,27
Say hello to James, our new narrator (his links in the description)! I fired the old narrator because he sounded too much like George Soros, and he din't even like the job too much.
Plus this might increase productivity, and who knows, maybe catch the eye (or ear) of the algorithm...
Oh and I didn't even mention the new-new visuals!
I hope the old narrator is good and well.
I tought you were one man army.
The new visuals are great! Regarding the narrator, the old narrator was not the best, but he had a very clear voice and was pleasant to listen to. No offence, but this new guy sounds like he is drooling all the time. I really don't like it...
@@aleksapetrovic6519 It's called humour... ;)
Yeah dude idk about this new narrator, he just doesn’t have that deep weathered voice that history narrators need to sound super based. He is like 4/10 at best sorry man. Still though thanks for posting
Respect For Hungarian Hero
In Albania Is Well Known & Respected He Was a Real Friend Of George Kastrioti Scanderbeg And Friend Of Albania.
With Love & Respect From Albania To Our Friends In Hungary. 🇭🇺🇦🇱🇭🇺🇦🇱
Wat happened to skanderberg? Why he not join the fight
Er hat 3 schlachten gegen Sultan Murad 2 verloren
Ethnic Romanian Hero. Lion of a man
@@SoldierOfChristAlmighty what does it mean Wat happened to skanderberg? the Albanians were the only Europeans to defeat the Ottomans like no other European army in the entire Ottoman history ...and also fighting on two fronts against an Ottoman-Venetian alliance
We need more Hunyadi's.
We need Hunyadi again.
"Janissaries began as elite corps made up through the devşirme system of child slavery, by which young Christian boys, notably Armenians, Albanians, Bosnians, Bulgarians, Croats, Greeks and Serbs, were taken from the Balkans, enslaved and converted to Islam, and incorporated into the Ottoman army".
Disgraceful
But but leftards keep telling us whites had never been slaves
@@cjclark2002Hayır,Zekice,en aznindan koleleri kullanmanin en iyi yolu€,ustelik kole cocuklar hicbirseyin farkinda degil ve bu yuzden islami hemen benimsiyorlar
Tips to use you hungarian army : scream < Attack ! > with Hunyadi's voice, *every Hungarian unit in a 10 miles radius gets +10 in morale and strength* .
It's the TF2 soldier's voice too!
Plus 20% infantry combat ability and 10% more discipline.
@@Blaj1987 more like -10% in discipline, 'cause his own troops and allies seems to have the bad habit to flee at the turning point of the battle. =)
@@florianpierredumont4775 🤣 i know man it was a Eu4 pun
@@Blaj1987 or +10%, considering he is starting from 0. ^^
Excellent video. Such a crisp clear description of events.
I didn't know Hungary had any success against the Turks.
Perfect job! Thank you. Please make turkish translate. Time to turks learn real history!!! Respect to hungarian heros! Long live to Hungary!! 🇭🇺💪
*Plage joins the fight* game over. XD 😏
Ummarrim macaristaan tarihini ovmuyorsundur.cunku koskoca imparatorluk osmanli karsisinda mohac savasinda saadece 2 saat dayanabildi,trajikomik
Jon Hunyadi was one of the most Based and Beautiful men of history.
I know life would be pretty hard and rough to adjust to, but I would kill to travel back to that time, just to have the chance to serve/fight and most likely die for a true example of an incredible and brilliant man such as him.
Skanderbeg and Hunyadi
The same nobility class that abamdoned him, were the same ones that abandoned Konstantinople, and made a deal with the Sultan they would not help Byzantium as long as the Sultan promised to leave them alone and let them keep their lands!
Easily
One of the most evil vecious devils of the west
Great Video.
30:15
Its been said that brankovic stopped the Albanians from crossing into Kosovo to link up with hunyadi.
Oh hell yea, this completes my weekend, thank-you!
very detailed. hunyadi's defeat at varna was a great tragedy.
One note: Belgrade not Belgrade at this time, the city original name Nándorfehérvár
What in old hungarian language means: "bulgar-white castle"
..because the Byzantian empire took from bulgars back...than the hungarians took from Byzant. Like wedding gift goes to Serbia. When Georg Brankovits can not hold more against the ottomans, give on Hunyadi and took for this many hungarian village and castle,s.
So goes back to Hungary for ca 100 years. The serbian people always called them : Belo-grad...the "White Castle" 😉
Yes we know, every city Europe was actually Hungarian.
@@jozefdobrovodsky2932 No, but Belgrad is Hungarian
@@jozefdobrovodsky2932 Perhaps, you read my post before. Than you must not write some stupidity.
@@Sabartoasfaloi Vojvodina Also ...
Good work Pike & Shot for covering these topics your way :)
Underrated channel!!! YT algorithm needs to stop being crappy to these great history channels
I think you forgot to mention that the disaster at the battle of Varna was the result of great pressure by legate Cesarini and pro-war faction on king Vladislaus. The treaty was violated about a week after its ratification.
I want to see more about the Ottomans. The Battle of Mohacs is a must. Maybe some videos about the expansion into the Mediterranean too? The great siege of Malta? That'd be cool.
The Hungarian-Ottoman line will definitely continue later this year.
Malta.....
awesome content, cant believe only has 4k views... keep up the good work !!
Optimistic about the new narrator but he sounds almost like a newscaster at times and I did prefer the previous guy's slightly understated style. Best of luck with your future endeavors.
New narrator sounds like he has a permanent stuffed up nose, not good for history
I liked to old voice, more exotic and I got used to it :( .....
You'll get used to this one too. Maybe I'll also narrate some small thing from time to time.
I hope I’m not too rude by insisting on this, but the whole tone of the video has changed. Your unidentifiable accent, the serene music and your gravitas of voice made for an calm, allof experience that befits the times of old. There was both a sort of detachment and a contemplation of tragedy. There was some repetitive intonation, I guess because these are long scripts. The new experience is more epic, demands more excitement and thus seems more like the other simmilar channels. Best of luck.
The guys who seem to win are the ones who withdraw before they are not annihilated but upon realizing the disadvantage. That way they can sustain war for long and win the attrition warfare. Only thing they need to maintain permanently is the integrity of their core intention.
Hey there, a really great video again and it was a bliss to watch it. I must admit that the new narrator, for me atleast, is a much better choice than the previous one was. Keep up the good work and I hope soon this channel gets picked up by the algorithym 😉😉
Happy Easter Everyone!
The palaces, temples, tombs, fortresses, castles, and other monuments were nice
The Hungarian Legend 🇭🇺🏹
You rong he was romanian he's name os. Ioan de humedoara
He was Romanian.
@@jozefdobrovodsky2932 Slovaks are Hungarians
@@southernhungarian Yes
@Cypher Just as you Romanians are not Dacians, there is no proof that you guys are Dacians, but Latinised Slavs. And Hungarians have genetic proof that we are indeed the descendants of the Huns.
Skanderbeg&Jon Hunyadi Heroes 🇦🇱🇭🇺
You have done an excellent job of following and keeping clear all the tangled threads of intrigue and military campaigns. But couldn't you have taken the little time to learn that Magyar words and names are accented on the FIRST syllable?!
Well done!Good job!👍Long live to Hungary🇭🇺Make turkish translate to!☝️
2 minute silence for people who read Hyundai instead of Hunyadi😔
I think kingdom come deliverance 2 should come out and have it be an ottoman invasion.
that would be awesome, i would love if they actually spoke hungarian, czech, old german and so on in the game with english subtitles to the lines you have in-game language proficiency for. kinda like in kingdom come 1 but going all in with it instead of making half the game authentic and the czech half basically british english.
finally,I waited long for you to upload some of your amazing vids
Damned good channel, sir. Please keep it up!!!
Thank you for the subtitles! My ears still hear but my brain doesn't always distinguish words correctly; one too many blows to the head.
Glorious.
Its Nándorfehérvár not belgrad
This guy never stood still.
Great work!
Sipahis were not light cavalry, not necessarily. They could be light or medium or heavy depending on the region they come from and the tradition.
By the higher European standards, the eastern heavy cavalry is seen as light cavalry.
Awesome as always
I have got a question.
Do you think if Hunyadi and Skenderbeg would have made it to link up, do you think they would have won the 2nd battle of Kosova and also do you think they could have managed to advance even further into the empire?
Sadly we'll never know what would have happened...
i think they would have won it
@@szeklergeneral4266 skenderbeg used guerilla tactic. He didnt had the balls to confront ottoman army. Out of albanian land ottomans would crush them.
@@subutaykhan9387 Scanderbeg fought all kinds of wars not only guerilla tactic...and unlike the little sultans who remain hidden in tents, he participated in all wars as a commander and as a simple warrior
@@subutaykhan9387 without forgetting that half of the Scanderbeg battles were fought outside today's Albania In Ottoman territory ..he also fought on two fronts and defeated a Venetian-Ottoman coalition...he also carried out a military campaign in Italy as always he won there too ...no sultan had the balls to personally go into battle against Scanderbeg....they brought their huge armies to Albania but did not enter into battle personally then when they saw that their armies were being halved they fled
Just found this channel and it is very good. James is very good but needs to get his head around pronounciations if he is a Brit.
22:15 lol I can't lie. That's pretty funny.
"Thanks for the payday. YOLO!"
What's with the coughing?
John Hunyadi :
"Don't get caught in my pincher."
U should get tweeter for your Channel.
Battle of Varna makes every Polish person cringe with eyes shut and jaws locked.
😢
i ❤ Hunyadi & Skanderbeg 🇭🇺🇦🇱
I bet Kings and General feel threatened by this channel .
A little silly to call the Balkans, which were at this time still over 90% Christian, the "lands of the heathen".
They really said nice name and truncated the first letter of each name.
This dude is my 30x great grandfather. Bad ass mfer
but greatest tragedy was Hunyadi's defeat after his victory at Belgrade
As alwayes serbians duble standard is they best attitude.
Wow! What a legend in the face of such odds. If the Kings of Europe had supported him!
The hypocritical kings of Europe, the kings of Hungary, imprisoned Vlad and cooperated with the Ottomans. Why is it because the Ottomans are good and Vlad is evil?
sad to hear of Hunyadi defeat, Islamic invasion is still going on in Europe but its silently shaping Europe now😢
who killed Murat in Kosovo?
Ne frage ist janos hunyadi ein magyar oder ein walache
Don't know how to break it to you (or him), but I don't like the new narrator at all.
You enunciated better and... well I don't like to say this, but he sounds like a GPS.
Also, it might just be my shitty headset, but the mic seems to saturate at times.
Incredibly sorry for the mean comment.
Agreed
Good videos but what is with the throat clearing added to the videos
That's an effect :))
so like EU4 ???
real graphics
Non-attachment - Kindle edition by Stanley, Brandon. Politics & Social Sciences Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
Orthodox under Murad-II:
( Around 1443 AD under Ottoman Sultan Murad-II period )
" On all sides ( Pope's allies at Northen Balkan, sharing Ottoman border) there were
uprisings against the Ottoman overlords and soon the Turkish garrisons
were driven from a number of important castles and fortresses. But it should not be supposed that the Balkan peoples joined in common revolt
against Ottoman rule. By prompt payment of the ' harac', the tribute always imposed on them, the Christians of the conquered countries purchase the right to live unmolested in their faith and to maintain their customs and many of their institutions.......Those who paid their taxes fully and punctually enjoyed a life scarcely different from that of pre-Ottoman ( Roman or Byzantine)
times. Such, at least, was the case in the fifteenth century. It was only much later that bribery, extortion, blackmail, and usury made their appearance in the Ottoman provinces, that the officials, often spurred by
insatiable greed, began to suck the blood of the population, and that all life was poisoned by deception and distrust. But this was in the decadence
of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; conditions were very different under Murad II, who, as we have noted, was respected even among his adversaries for his sense of justice.
Thus it was not so much the people who rebelled against the new masters ( muslims) as the would-be rulers, who feared for their lands as well as for those privileges and liberties which they still retained."
Book: Mehmed the
Conqueror
and his time
Author: Franz
Babinger
Edited: William C
Hickman
Translator: Ralph
Manheim
Edition: 1959
Page: 26,27
the new narration is awesome.
French XVI religion wars PLEASEEEEEEEEEE
They lost battle of varna, kosovo but they are still legend
Comment for the allmighy algorthim.
Just cant figure how Jan Žižka could possible participate on that, he was dead by that time :D Died 1424 and and last 5years before he was kinda busy with repelling crusade that was called on Bohemia :D Probably adding more year marks to the video would made that clear... Although few years after Žižka passed away hussites fell into civil war which ended with victory of conservative husites which wanted peace and in upcoming years, V. Jagello managed to be crowned as Bohemian King which lead to ceasefire with Pope and Sigmund. It was after then that hussite mercenaries became famous in Europe. I jsut dont think your mention of J. Žižka is on point.
Jan Giskra has been mentioned in this video. He is another guy..
Pl read this history ;
( i ). " The main reason for Ottaman success , however , was the development of stable and permanent institutions of government that transformed a tribal polity into a workable state ".
( ii ) " The Ottamans utilized all human resources in their emirate and quickly learned skills in bureaucracy and diplomacy ........ They also did not slaughter every Christian in their path ; rather , they encouraged the Christian inhabitants of the countryside and the towns to join them . Islamic law and tradition declared that enemies who surrendered on demand should be treated with tolerance .
( iii ). " The Christians of Bithynia were obliged to pay the ' harac ' , or capitation tax , for the privilege of being tolerated , but this was no more burdensome than the taxes they had paid to the Byzantine government , which had neglected their interests . Once they had made the decision to surrender or defect , the Byzantine population resigned to their fate ". " Some Christians converted to Islam upon joining the Ottamans ; however, this was not demanded . Many local Christians even participated in Ottaman raids against Byzantium ". BOOK : Encyclopaedia of the Ottoman Empire . AUTHOR : Gabor Agoston and Bruce Masters . Edition : 2009 page -109 .
"Existing sources , such as the 25th century Ottoman census records , suggest that the earliest converts to Islam in the Balkans came from the ranks of the Balkan nobility and military elite that could supply the Ottomans with the manpower .............
BOOK : Encyclopaedia of the Ottoman Empire . AUTHOR : Gabor Agoston and Bruce Masters . Edition : 2009 page -146 .
17 - 20 / 10 / 1448 not nowember
31:58
The turk slayer
a toff dude
Ótimo
my wallachians consisted in 1/3, at least, of the force from Kosovo Polje 2. No world about my ancestors who fought for the Cross. Shame on you!
One of the most important Romanian medieval rulers
😂
So you mean he was the byzantian emperor? Just because back then the byzantines called themselves romanians. If not I am interested which country did he rule?
Hunyadi was half Papuan and half Ashkenazi Jew.
And Murad half armenian half yoruk
@@mirceaenea1637 No he was Zulu but his grandfather was half Okinawan.
and half Motunabe, you forgot to mention. All real heroes have three halves, it is well known.
Drink less! 😂
Honedoara ❤
Hunyadvàra*
Can't know how I bumped onto this. All in all Damn good video 🥇😎. I also watched those rather similar from mStarTutorials and kinda wonder how you guys create these vids. MSTAR TUTORIALS also had cool information about similiar things on his channel.
Nándorfehérvár, not Belgrade!☝
Peace lover, Ottoman Sultan Murad - II.
We have already noted that not only the Ottoman but also the Byzantine chroniclers accord the highest praise to the justice and mildness, honesty and forthrightness of Murad II, to mention only the principal traits of his character. Occasionally this emphasis on the bright side of
the sultan's nature has been explained as an effort to paint as dark a
picture as possible of his successor, destroyer of the remnant of the Byzantine Empire. But when we examine these historians' words more
closely, we see that they were meant in all sincerity. "Sultan Murad," observes Chalcocondylas ( Contemporary historian ), for example, "was a man who loved law and justice and had fortune on his side. He waged war only in self-defense. He attacked no one unjustly. But when he was attacked by others he
took up arms. If no one provoked him, he took no pleasure in campaigns, but the reason for this is not to be sought in laziness. For when it was
necessary to defend his empire, he did not fear to set out even in winter, nor did he measure the dangers and difficulties attending his undertakings." Ducas( contemporary historian ), probably the most reliable of the Byzantine annalists, said
to be a man enamored of the truth, gives special emphasis, in his judgment of Murad II, to the loyalty with which the sultan observed his treaties with the Christian powers, and stigmatizes the failure of the Christians always to exhibit the same virtue, as exemplified by their breach of the peace of Szeged. "Murad kept his given word,'' writes Ducas, "and not only to those of his own people and faith, for he never violated the treaties he had concluded with the Christians; when the Christians transgressed against the treaties and broke their given word, this did not escape the eye of God, which sees the truth. His just punishment befell them. But His wrath was not long lived, for the barbarian did not follow up his victories. He did not desire the total destruction of any people. And when the defeated sent envoys to sue for peace, he gave them a friendly reception, granted their plea, laid down the sword, and went the ways of peace. For this reason also the Father of Peace granted him to die in peace and not by the violence of the sword."
Book: Mehmet the Conqueror
and his time
Edited: William C
Hickman
Translator: Ralph
Manheim
Edition: 1959
Page: 61,62
This is bad even for a joke!
"He waged war only in self-defense. He attacked no one unjustly."
Im very disappointed at serbia 😕
Hunyadi, one of my favorite romanians from the middle ages!
in Your dream
He was Serbian!
@@xerxen100 Average balkan interaction everyone claims everything
You guys steal wallets, cars, phones. But now y'all start to steal History too ? Typic Romanian
@@xerxen100 Bullshit 😂
Clearing your throat ever 30 seconds during narration makes your videos unwatchable.
You know it was an effect right? Probably won't be used next time 😉
People of Turkey should realize their own history and knowledge that they are not Turks (Central Asians) but actually mix of Greek/Europeans and Middle Easterners...
Principal component analysis of more than 500,000 SNP genotypes reveals significant overlap between present-day Turks and Middle Easterners and a relationship with Europeans and South and Central Asians. According to this study, the genetic ancestry of Turks is 38% European, 35% Middle Eastern, 18% South Asian and 9% Central Asian.This means that the vast majority of the Turkish population does not descend from Turks (a small part only 9%)
2:08 *Submit or your kids will die*
So Romanians were everywhere where history was made.
Iancu de Hunddoara was the son of the Romanian small nobleman Voicu and of Elizabeth (possible descendent of the byzantine aristocracy).Romanians do not have a problem with his origin , Hungarians have, so Hungarian nationalist propaganda invented that he was the son of Sigismund. Because accepting the reality of a romanian origin for the golden age Hungarian king Matei Corvinul is unbearable for most contemporary Hungarian nationalist propaganda.
Nobody thinks here in Hungary that his father was Sigismund, it was a legend in the time of his son Matthias. János's fathers origin is obviusly cuman, his name "Voicu" is the romanized form of hungarian/cuman name Vajk/Vayk which is a pagan name and it was literally the pagan name of our first king Saint Stephen. And the mother of János was Morzsinai Erzsébet (Elizabeth) and she was from a Transylvanian noble family of moldovan/wallachian descent, but the family got its nobility in the 1200s from king IV. Béla and the family got hungarised overtime. Plus the Hunyadi family's DNA is literally proven that its like 70% cuman and you can't change biological facts.
@@balentinus Brother, it's historically accepted nowadays that the Corvin/Hunyadi family were founded by Voicu who was indisputably a Wallachian/Romanian nobleman.
There's nobody of importance who claims he was Cuman, much less any DNA testing being done to prove it.
@@jozefdobrovodsky2932 Moldova and Wallachia were founded by leftovers of the Golden Horde (Besarab for example) and cumans. They were the nobles of these principalities because vlachs didn't care and didn't know how to create a state, and didn't even lived in cities thats why the romanian word for city comes from hungarian. These noble families got romanized in the 15th-16th century. The dna test of the hunyadi family was done by croatian and hungarian scientist in 2021, where they they took dna test of Corvin János son of Matthias and the from the son of Corvin János who is Corvin Christopher, they are both burried in the church of the croatian city of Lepoglava.
Saying the Hunyadi family is of wallachian descent is fine, but saying that they were romanian is completely dumb and romanian nationalist propaganda
@@balentinus Provide a source for your claims of the DNA testing, I have heard of no such things.
The only thing I found while looking it up is that the Hungarian government asked for DNA testing to be stopped because "it wasn't needed"...
Also, from a little research and asking around, it seems the Romanians also use the word "cetate" for city which seems to be derived directly from latin...
I don't know what's with the Hungarian claim for their words but I think Romanians know their language better than Hungarians, just saying.
Also if you say that Wallachia and Moldavia were formed by the remanants of the Golden Horde then I don't think we can have a historical discussion of any kind, you would be completely oblivious to the topic.
No European state was formed by mongolians, this is just a Hungarian nationalist Turanist obsession with trying to claim that they are somehow related to steppe nomads while also trying to claim they are European.
You say every country in Europe was formed by Cumans/Mongols/Kipachs/Sarmatians which is just pure schizophrenia.
Claiming that the Hunyadis were of Wallachian origin is the same thing as saying they were Romanian, in the same way the Habsburgs who ruled over Hungary were Austrians, not Hungarians....
Both the above statements are true, the Hunyadis were Wallachians/Romanians and the Habsburgs were Austrians.
I don't know how you say the Hunyadis were Romanianised by the Romanians in the 15th century when nationalism didn't exist at the time.
Romanian voivode of Transylvania!
Was he Romanian? (Hunyadi)
@@peter-df6wl Yes. No doubt. Even the Hungarian documents before he rose in politics named him "John the Romanian" (”Iohannes Olah”). He was named also "the white knight of Walachia" etc.
@@ionbrad6753 So what? What is your point? Matthias Corvinus, was one of the greatest kings of Hungary.
@@peter-df6wl I just replied to your question. Was he Romanian? Yes. If you do not want answers, don't ask questions.
@@ionbrad6753 Ah Ok! I didn't realised that was my questions. But back then was no Romania.
Hire doesn't say he was Romanian?
"János Hunyadi, English John Hunyadi or John Huniades, (born 1407?, Hunyad, Transylvania-died August 11,1456, Belgrade), Hungarian general "
Some others saying!
"Hunyadi János, also known as John Hunyadi, was of Romanian origin. He was born in the Kingdom of Hungary, which at the time included parts of modern-day Romania. He was a prominent military leader and statesman during the 15th century, and played an important role in defending Hungary against the Ottoman Empire."
You have some GREAT voivodes in your history, like Mircea the Older, Stephen the Great (very appreciated by Hungarians I ), Vlad Tepes (Dracula), Ion Voda cel Viteaz, Radu de la Afumați or Constantin Brâncoveanu.
So way you saying he was Romanian?
Whay is that so important for Romanian
to say he was Romanian. Apparently his Father was Wallachian mother was Hungarian and hi was born in Hungary.
So how that make him Romanian ?
Hungary 1
Ottoman 0
*For now*
*evil janissary laughter in Mohács*
It was just a matter of time. There were few empires wealthier than the Ottoman empire at the time. Hungary was going to fall eventually. Their only realistic chance was going to a diplomatic one, too bad they couldn't come to terms considering Hungarians and Turks share common ancient roots. They're like distant brothers.
@@TheChimples in that time people consider religion as a base of there ethnicity not genetic or language
@@TheChimples not really. If you watched this video, you would see how lucky the Ottomans were on so many occasions.
@@nikolavideomakerHistory: How do they face a coalition of European kings and win? This is not luck
He was never a Hungarian...but a Romanian. His full name was Iancu de Hunedoara. Hunyadi is the Magyarization of his name. His army was formed by Romanians, Székelys and Magyars.
Its propaganda
@@GM-os6foand the historical sources are propaganda?🤣
@@thieph even the word Hunedoara is a Hungarian word
Hunyadvàra
So go home
@@GM-os6fo you are pathetic troll, how much chinese yuan you are paid by Orban montlhy?
@@GM-os6fo how much chinese yuan Orban pay you monthly? Pathetic bzogor troll🤣
With his hazardous campanies, Hunyady distroied the core of the low and middle nobility of wallachians, serbians, hungarians and bosnians and loose every chase of expel the Ottomans Turks outside Europe. With his volatile politics, The "Great" Matheus King, his son, distroyed Hungary in less then 20 years after his death
"The silence that overtook the room did not cow him, either, as he stared down the generals and diplomats gathered there who knew not what to say at such a proposal. Even the bold Hungarian warrior of Wallachian blood, John Hunyadi, felt the tension. He and his fellows were not convinced and shifted uncomfortably as John Capistrano awaited their response.
The only man who seemed cool under the heated call to arms was one who some doubted was a man at all. Another of Wallachian descent, he sat still as a statue, eyes smoldering beneath his princely headgear and his tremendous moustache concealing any sign from his mouth. Vlad Dracul, called the Impaler, was listening, recognizing something in this wiry, hollow-cheeked old priest that matched the fanaticism and ferocity of the Turks.
Dracul’s eyes met Hunyadi’s. Thus began the unlikely alliance among a saint, a soldier, and a vampire."
www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/dracula-joins-john-capistrano-in-war-at-belgrade
Orthodox under Murad-II:
( Around 1443 AD under Ottoman Sultan Murad-II period )
" On all sides ( Pope's allies at Northen Balkan, sharing Ottoman border) there were
uprisings against the Ottoman overlords and soon the Turkish garrisons
were driven from a number of important castles and fortresses. But it should not be supposed that the Balkan peoples joined in common revolt
against Ottoman rule. By prompt payment of the ' harac', the tribute always imposed on them, the Christians of the conquered countries purchase the right to live unmolested in their faith and to maintain their customs and many of their institutions.......Those who paid their taxes fully and punctually enjoyed a life scarcely different from that of pre-Ottoman ( Roman or Byzantine)
times. Such, at least, was the case in the fifteenth century. It was only much later that bribery, extortion, blackmail, and usury made their appearance in the Ottoman provinces, that the officials, often spurred by
insatiable greed, began to suck the blood of the population, and that all life was poisoned by deception and distrust. But this was in the decadence
of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; conditions were very different under Murad II, who, as we have noted, was respected even among his adversaries for his sense of justice.
Thus it was not so much the people who rebelled against the new masters ( muslims) as the would-be rulers, who feared for their lands as well as for those privileges and liberties which they still retained."
Book: Mehmed the
Conqueror
and his time
Author: Franz
Babinger
Edited: William C
Hickman
Translator: Ralph
Manheim
Edition: 1959
Page: 26,27