Flexure Formula (Part 2) - Mechanics of Materials

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 104

  • @raveenekanayake9494
    @raveenekanayake9494 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    3 hour lecture in 30 minutes and 1000 times better!!!!! XD seriously im starting to love a subject i hated! THANK YOU!

    • @MrRaymond10
      @MrRaymond10 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      less than 30 min if u speed up B)

  • @TimothyMoananu
    @TimothyMoananu 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    You've simply encouraged me to continue with engineering with the fun that you had explaining this haha. Thank you so much and God bless

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Thank you for the kind words. I believe. Let me know when you graduate!
      "You need to crawl before you can ball." - K. West

    • @rohanjain1997
      @rohanjain1997 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@structurefree I'm guessing he probably graduating soon or has already!

  • @pellepeloton7627
    @pellepeloton7627 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    oh my.. this was amazing. I specially liked how you opened up the second moment of area. Most of the books just tell you its Iz=int y^2 Da and then some shallow explanation and how you actually calculate it. Thank you so much! I linked this channel to my fellow engineering students.

  • @anamajhol
    @anamajhol 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad I found this channel . Thank you sooo much!

  • @hamzairfan2117
    @hamzairfan2117 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He explained it so well and in such an amusing way. I really enjoyed learning the flexure formula.

  • @simonblue56
    @simonblue56 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, I really enjoy the videos. You know what, I am so excited that I do not want to go to bed. Wonderful explanations worth great appreciation !

  • @IAmKuwerican
    @IAmKuwerican 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you much you saved my life. You have explained it better than my instructor waaaaaaaaaay better!

  • @AnkitKumar-si3zx
    @AnkitKumar-si3zx 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You deserve a gold medal🏅 in teaching!

  • @almerovanrooyen4463
    @almerovanrooyen4463 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YOU ARE A LEGEND!! I WON'T EVER ATTEND MY CLASSES AGAIN.

  • @shylildude
    @shylildude 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i like your attitude and the way you explain it is top notch also your neatness helps thanks for all that you do man

  • @zubairilyasmuhammadilyas7767
    @zubairilyasmuhammadilyas7767 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love for your simple explanations Allah will give you more success .🎓

  • @elc355
    @elc355 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn , unstucking feels so good . Really like it!

  • @TheJagclash11
    @TheJagclash11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    ..your lecture truly the bring understanding of the foundation

  • @mahboobehrezaei1516
    @mahboobehrezaei1516 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much. I'm having my last bachelor's degree exam tomorrow and these videos of yours are being super helpful. (If I may, you say BAM way too much! I would save it for the final formula only)

  • @_sica
    @_sica 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have just come out of a 2 our lecture with no clue what was going on. Even with this sped up to 1.5x I have learned more here.. Thanks :)

  • @rodri11
    @rodri11 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much , I'm taking this class in Germany and woow you just made it so easy to understand

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the negative strain denotes the compression side of the beam. I chose to say that negative strain is to the right and positive strain is to the left in order to match the deformed shape. Instead of arrows, it might be better to just think of strain values at each point along the section of the beam.

  • @yunusemre-jx9ju
    @yunusemre-jx9ju 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks lecture , greetings from Turkey . Very good expression

  • @AGhawanmeh
    @AGhawanmeh 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is just PERFECT !
    You have a great way to do it . Keep it up :D

  • @hariston9
    @hariston9 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    keep it up and thanks my carrer will surely will get a boost with these

  • @FelixyzTv
    @FelixyzTv 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    still watching in 2013. keep on going !

  • @akarshsonni2829
    @akarshsonni2829 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you so much man! This was really helpful! :D

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Akarsh Sonni you're welcome!

  • @shafiraanindita3087
    @shafiraanindita3087 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks alot. Saves alot of time. do you have any example problem?

  • @NeodudeQuake
    @NeodudeQuake 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are a super hero.

  • @nikolaynikolkin1955
    @nikolaynikolkin1955 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining! Very useful video! Can you tell what kind of program do you use for drawing? Is it paint?

  • @harshaunknown
    @harshaunknown 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much, Clearly Explained....

  • @frt2406
    @frt2406 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pirate Hooke.. You are great man :)

  • @michaelnibret9446
    @michaelnibret9446 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very attractive explanation about selfishness formula ' stress = -my/i '

  • @nimeshinimeshi
    @nimeshinimeshi 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir u are a life saver :) thank u so very much... that selfish equation thing is awesome (Y)

  • @rozanashahid6603
    @rozanashahid6603 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you very much .. that explained a lot of stuck things .. keep going (Y)

  • @erasmusbessie
    @erasmusbessie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you do another video about the flexural strength formula as mention in ASTM C78 (concrete beam) because that's the reason why I came to this video.
    It says, Flexural Strength = (PxL) / bd³
    Where, P is max pressure that works on beam till it fails, L: length of beam, b= base, d= depth.
    So PxL is Moment right?
    And what is bd³? Isn't it supposed to be Inertia (Ix) , which is 1/12 bd³?=M/Ix
    Why there's no 1/12 in that Formula?
    Thank you very much. And I hope you Understand my question because English is not my language. 🙏🙏🙏

  • @structurefree
    @structurefree  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for watching!

  • @asadnaushad3962
    @asadnaushad3962 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks !!!
    this video did help me understand. Great job :)

  • @flatboat70452
    @flatboat70452 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I never heard it described as the selfish formula (of course i always did Mc/I). and Ayn Rand reference was hilarious! Of course i was also selfishly disappointed because i searched for Residual Stresses in... Even if you part went plastic, we still say plane sections remain plane.

  • @19-hammadnasir35
    @19-hammadnasir35 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much sir!

  • @lukmanali6426
    @lukmanali6426 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:38 not sure if this is a stupid question. does that mean the magnitude of the stress above the neutral plane is equal to the stress below the neutral plane. and at 7:04 in my head it seems like it should be Mz = T*Arm +C*Arm?

  • @arupkuet
    @arupkuet 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome teaching capablity

  • @5atoru
    @5atoru 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i cracked up when you described that formula as selfish :))

  • @g870601
    @g870601 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is really awesome!!! love this video ~! save my day!! exam in2 days ~ this really really really helped :D

  • @rahnumaahmad9711
    @rahnumaahmad9711 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    'My'nus the rant it's good

  • @fatimadyczynski
    @fatimadyczynski 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good video

  • @Dan-mw4zu
    @Dan-mw4zu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is it that Ɛ @ y isn't negative, but the maximum value of Ɛ [@ C] IS negative? If we're defining compressive strain as negative, why is the strain at y [which is above the N.A] not also negative? Thanks

  • @anesmerazi603
    @anesmerazi603 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    why are the stress vectors not in the same direction as the strain ?

  • @ebidash
    @ebidash 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect !!thank you very much

  • @shivpalpatine
    @shivpalpatine 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if you only know deflection amount, moment of inertia, elastic modulus, length, and cross section (circular cross section) for a simple supported beam on both sides.
    Force and moment are unknown.

  • @007hellion
    @007hellion 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, while calculating how you determine Y should it be measured from top or bottom and why ? in case of symmetrical section its same thing whether you measure from top or bottom but in unsymmetrical section its not the same.

  • @kimleyson1471
    @kimleyson1471 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    hello, i would just like to ask why did the strain(max) was changed into stress(max) during the derivation of normal stress by substituting it in hooke's law in 4:17 of your vid. i'm confused. please help me.

  • @WHY70122
    @WHY70122 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I followed the video pretty good until the part when you mention the Negative Strain? I'm confused about the direction of the arrows you draw. Explanation please?

  • @thomasoreilly4284
    @thomasoreilly4284 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 4:25 where does the σmax/E come from? I see how you can go from σ=Ε*Σ to σ/Ε=Σ and it was already stated Σ=(-y/c)*Σmax but I don't know(can't see how) the Σmax= σmax/E.

  • @AfzalCassim
    @AfzalCassim 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!

  • @bullhornn
    @bullhornn 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have a video that translates all of this into real-world implications, like wood and steel structure design or conceptual language. I'm thinking of something that discusses the material without using variables as a language? Rather than saying "Sigma is equal to E times Epsilon... Sigma divided by E... equal to minus y divided by c..." To some that sounds like a sentence, to others (myself) it sounds like a foreign language that I need translated without going to a huge variable glossary.

  • @tiagoperon306
    @tiagoperon306 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    selfish equation... heahehaeha
    i will never forget this

  • @shielaumali145
    @shielaumali145 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    big help dude tysm!!! ❤

  • @TrueAmenda
    @TrueAmenda 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    For a weirder cross-section beam (asymmetrical), will the strain-profile triangles you drew no longer be the same? (share a similar angle) Thanks

  • @zhangbarry1752
    @zhangbarry1752 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One question, when we calculation the stress, hooke's low can only apply at elastic scope. so for the stress at plastic stage, could you please explain more, because I am thinking the the Sigma along y axis may be not linear

    • @noname-ic5mx
      @noname-ic5mx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      we assume we are in the elastic region (linear region) where you can apply hooks formula. And we don't talk about plastic region

  • @SaiKrishna-vz1up
    @SaiKrishna-vz1up 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u so much

  • @湾湾炸鸡配可乐
    @湾湾炸鸡配可乐 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank U !

  • @IceyJunior
    @IceyJunior 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    negative stress should be -> , right ? 5.09

  • @devops6697
    @devops6697 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    damn you should be my prof

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +BENCH MARKING that would be fun.

  • @severalchildren
    @severalchildren 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always think of captain Hook, I dont know why.. Har Har Har.
    Lol, Wonderful :)
    P.s. that is not the only thing i learned in this video! haha

  • @yamikawaii321
    @yamikawaii321 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the summation of force of x section is
    ∑F=0
    integral sigma da
    I don't understand what is meant by integral sigma da

  • @garimashama1426
    @garimashama1426 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir why the stress profile and strain profile looks different ...i mean where strain is negative stress is also negative ...should it not be in same crossed curve like stain beside of "K" please help me

    • @shubhamkukreja95
      @shubhamkukreja95 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      garima shama he has shown that by arrow , right for tensile

  • @abokaled94
    @abokaled94 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I LOVE YOU

  • @justpassingby7262
    @justpassingby7262 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wondering , if the bending moment is equal to the stress times first moment of area . Why dont we stop here and say that the bending moment is zero. ( I know that its not but just wondering why)

    • @justpassingby7262
      @justpassingby7262 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ahh I think I figured it out , is it cause stress is not a constant but stress max is ?

  • @dohendra
    @dohendra 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in strain profile ,when we are using similar triangle method to correlate strain at Y and strain max. at C , from where this negative sign came . e and e max both are negative and Y is having same sign as that of C . a bit confusing !!!!

    • @eugeneougo5472
      @eugeneougo5472 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Dohendra Dubey Check out the first part of the video more keenly you will understand where the negative is coming from.

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Eugene Ougo thank you! I love it when our community responds to comments in a positive way. It makes me feel like I'm part of a massive, moving cloud of learning with lightning bolts streaking across the sky and thunder in its wake!

    • @carbon273
      @carbon273 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +structurefree I dont understand why E isn't negataive and Emax is. Is it because E = -y/p and y is positive so you will get E?

    • @shubhamkukreja95
      @shubhamkukreja95 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      because e is general and e max is negative due to change in length of section due to compressive force

  • @vishnusuhaas8682
    @vishnusuhaas8682 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 5:22 why is the direction of stress towards the cross section?

  • @nomipakistanli
    @nomipakistanli 10 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    SELFISH EQUATION........

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's Ayn Rand's favorite.

  • @imusician8885
    @imusician8885 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thnx bro

  • @foureyedcyclopse9412
    @foureyedcyclopse9412 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can't believe it was 3-D the whole time.

  • @abaahad1250
    @abaahad1250 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    helpful

  • @kirasoui
    @kirasoui 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i lost at 4:25 , why did modulus E cancel out? and why epsilon max is changed to sigma max? im confused

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hooke's Law. Captain Hooke...arrrgh!! Yo-ho, yo-ho, yo-ho, it's a pirate's life for me.

    • @ralphlacerna5625
      @ralphlacerna5625 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awts hahah

  • @pop4ti
    @pop4ti 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    how could i determine the value of y ?

  • @willtolife9323
    @willtolife9323 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, The view is not a section, but an elevation? what?

  • @rockherostar333
    @rockherostar333 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hahaha lol you rock man :D "the most selfish formula"

  • @amirhossainraju676
    @amirhossainraju676 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bammm it's great.😆😆

  • @hussnaincheema8422
    @hussnaincheema8422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    imma remember this forever
    the most selfish equation in the world

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aww yeah!! Of course the next question...is selfishness negative? Hmmmm.....

  • @tanyantanr1352
    @tanyantanr1352 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm a big Ayn Rand fan.

  • @xinninglam3807
    @xinninglam3807 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    cool, didn't know being 'stress'ful is being selfish

  • @tumblevid
    @tumblevid 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:00 loool

  • @sushrutdeshpande5599
    @sushrutdeshpande5599 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Selfish formula LOL

  • @danielyin9643
    @danielyin9643 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! this was really helpful. One suggestion: don't talk about the color you're choosing or say BAYAM since it cuts the train of thoughts and makes the information hard to understand. For a video like this it's not necessary to be constantly saying something. Hope this helped.

    • @joshuakravitz1524
      @joshuakravitz1524 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like when he does it. It makes the learning seem more natural and less scripted. STRUCTUREFREEEEE

  • @hddevani
    @hddevani 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there ...can you please give me your email id ? I have some questions and examples which I couldn't able to do ...as I am preparing for exam and refereeing to your series of lectures so it will be extremely helpful... Thank you...

  • @shielaumali145
    @shielaumali145 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    selfish equation HAHAHAHHA

  • @Manish_Kumar_Singh
    @Manish_Kumar_Singh 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    stop saying "baaaam" ....... irritating