@@Miyconst X99? Ha-ha, farewell my X79 setups since 2019 (first edit. - E5 2640+Kllisre X79M3+16Gb DDR3 2133 MHz+RX570 4 Gb, later it grown to E5 2689+Machinist V2.82+32Gb DDR3 2133 MHz+RX5700XT). Those were pretty capable somehow, especially with such a price. Few weeks ago I've shifted to AM4 (R5 5500+Jginyue B550I+16Gb DDR4 3600MHz+RX5700XT) - difference is big, I love my new setup. Thanks for review and hints for this ITX board, you helped me in my quest for a new mini board so much, Miyconst.
@@Miyconst correct, around the world alot of gamers can still use intel 775 and be very happy.... tech is growing but more than 50% of our world to game can use your vids and 580, b580 to game as they want
It's impressive that a nearly 10 year old platform is still this relevant. There are lots of useful tasks for these machines. I'm still using two x79 Xeon v2s for basic 3D design and programming tasks. They work perfectly fine.
Just got a xeon e5 2697a V4 paired with a HP Z440 and RTX 2060 super. An upgrade from xeon 1225 v2 lol. R 5600 build in my country was expensive so xeon ftw
I have an office PC that I lug around with between temp IT jobs. I use it as my main rig for everything. It has all ewaste parts. 1660 v3, x99 ws asus 3 way titan xp. It can play games all the way up to 8k with no issues at all! X99 is immortal!
great video, as someone still on an old E5-2680 V4 I think a more realistic paring for this kind of cpu is more like an RTX 3060 or Radeon rx 6600xt, meaning a budget system and would be fun to see that in the same testing and see how much the cpu impacts a lower tier graphics card
Thank you for doing this still. I always like entry xeon content, even when it's negative. I have built a few rigs with the utter lowest cost options i could get there on ali and off locals, and i am always surprised with the capabilities of even some of the trashiest x99 parts. I would love to see 2640v4 content, that one at an easily accessible $4 each seems too good to be true.. its a shame my $21 white qiyada x99 boards are nowhere near as exceptional😂. A few months ago i couldnt imagine building such usable machines for around 150 usd
I'm playing all the actual games with a E5-2690 V3 3.7GHz 12/12 (Unlock, undervolt, FSB OC), 32GB 2133 quad-channel 12-13-13-27, all the games running at 4K 60FPS Mid/High (FSR balanced) on a 6700 XT, in resume, my GPU is bottlenecking the E5-2690 V3 at 4K 60FPS native, want a upgrade to a 4070 Ti so soon...
@@eleonormota919 Todavía uso el viejo Haswell para mi computadora personal, con un procesador E3-1231 v3. Pero pasé de la plataforma X99 a la AM4 para las PC que vendo.
I see no reason why it shouldn't be compatible. For the best performance you would have to enable Resizable Bar and that's possible with most of the Chinese X99 motherboards, many latest options even have it as a BIOS menu option.
it's great platform unless i3/i5 12th gen or ryzen 5600 2nd become common, xeon will still great value B mobo + ryzen 5600 is still 2x the price of 2680v4 + mobo after all
Great video as always. But what about produtivity? Do you think the xeon e5 is still relevant in that functionality? A assembled a dual 2697v4 for video editing and a second one for geoprocessing and a think the cost benefit is hard to beat.
If you have a task that scales well across many cores and requires lots of RAM, it's next to impossible to find something more cost effective than LGA 2011-3.
I don't have any experience with video editing, by the way. I just felt an unreal difference compare to the 7th gen i5 my friend had. But... Do you think for premiere use and video compiling it was a god choice ? If not, what do you suggest?
I think that dual socket systems are bad for most of the users but if it works for you and you are happy, I see no reason to go into the "what if" territory. Adobe Premiere is known to favor CPUs with strong single core performance but compared to 7th gen i5, basically anything is strong.
Great video, thank you! So, as the resolution increases, will the gap between Xeon and the Ryzen 5 5600 close? For example, will the CPU bottleneck gradually decrease at 2K and 4K resolutions?
Perhaps these Xeons could be better tested with Hypervisor/VM setups. These CPUs are popular for home servers. Id personally like to see these comparisons with VMs using the Proxmox hypervisor! I currently have the Asus X99 IPMI board with an e5-2697 v4. I'm interested in a board with dual 2667 v3 CPUs, turbo unlocked (if possible).
TBU is very problematic with anything but Windows as far as I know. Testing Proxmos I couldn't even get it to boot with TBU, it would lock at startup. Dual socket solutions are designed for a few niche use cases and I don't recommend it for most of the users.
It's interesting to see the Xeon either be benefitted or hindered by the memory channels. In some cases quad is better, some cases dual is better. Even more crazy is that the average shows little difference lol.
@@Miyconst Thank you for all the work you've put into these videos. I have a 2699 V3 in a Machinist B9 board. Slightly better VRM (8 phases vs 6 in most) but I still feel like VRM is limited here especially for the higher core chips.
Undoubtedly. The only problem is the price. 😀 Also, it's not about "extra cores" it's about the overall performance of a CPU. Ryzen 7600 is still a 6-core CPU but it performs better than 5800X.
The comparison between dual channel and quad channel is really interesting. The most interesting result is my primary use case Fortnite with regard to the 1% lows. A 60% decrease in lows in quad channel relative to dual channel.
Yep.. this is a very weird result but I got it consistently. Please beware that I tested Fortnite with a game replay and live gaming might be different. Also, Fortnite constantly gets updates that also affect performance. So, I would say that both configurations are about the same.
@@Miyconst I will have to test it out. When you record game play do you use an App or a capture card? Which capture card do you recommend if you are using a capture card.
What about Asus Strix X99 Gaming motherboard? Found a good condition used one which is same price as chinese ones in my country. Can I mod it's bios to get turbo all on cores?
@Miyconst Yes i know! I mean about the relative performance. It would be cool to see how the A750/A770 and especially the B580 that is out now would benefit (or not) from switching from X99 to Ryzen.
@Miyconst no, i think whith a middle graphics like 6700xt for example the differences of fps Will be more shorts like the 7900xt. Thinking to cheap PC.
Hello, already asked in another video and you said 2697v4 but, I wanted to metion full prices. 2698v3 35$ 2697v3 35$ 2697v4 48$ Which one do you prefer? (2698v3 is brand new, not used)
4:55 цікаво, що у деяких випадках 2 канали пам'яті на Зіоні працювали швидше за 4 канали. Я би сказав, у більшості випадків. Як так? Ігри на стільки не заточені на 4-канальну пам'ять?
Я зачіпив цей феномен наприкінці відео, якщо коротко то яне експерт з контролерів пам'яті але наскільки мені відомо, якщо планка має два ранги то процесор одночасно може виконати дві операції. Мої 16ГБ модулі дворангові, 8ГБ однорангові.
I have the same CPU..Asrock X99 Taichi with 4x8=32 GB Quad Channel 3000MhZ Ram....Settings:Bus speed 103.6@all core 3.211 MhZ....HT OFF....Memory @1243 MhZ13.13.13.35 421clocks 2T Play most of the Time Battlefield 2042 @UHD with Low Settings with a GTX 1080TI ....my Frames are 50-70FpS
@@Miyconst I'm useing a V3 in a Z440 for VM's and home-lab stuff rn. Didn't know if you would be interested in a similar comparison or if you already have done one like this in this video vs a Ryzen or another cpu. Just throwing it out there. I'm trying to decide if I want to keep this Z440 or build something else and move on. Appreciate your videos. Have a good one.
@@Miyconst i play it sometimes, when i have time to update it, always 128 players. I am not too sensitive for stutters in fact... i am used to low specs. The thing i hate is the lack of FSR
Testing quad chanel and dual chanel on qd4/2697v3 and 4 modules 8gb ddr4 desktop. Very minor diference. And in CS2, 2 modules are realy better for everage fps than 4.
@Miyconst Not for me) All people try to buy a 4 channel motherboard. Only for numbers in Aida test mem/cash. X2 in read/write speeds. But in games... It is hard to find the difference. That's why on TH-cam I can't find any tests/evidence. Why gamers need 4 channels on xeon. Maybe the loading time will be reduced. I tested 16gb 2 channels and 32gb 4 channels. 16gb is still good for gaming.
🙂 i just checked and theres a few used X99 motherboards from the major board partners so thats what i would recommend, i dont care for AM4 because thats what everybody is doing already which is boring to me
The E5-2697A V4 turns out to be more interesting than the 18-core E5-2697 V4. The E5-2697 V4 for was the biggest disappointment for me at LGA-2011v3, it has too much reduced frequency on all cores.
Большая работа проделана, спасибо. Получается выгоднее всего брать эту платформу если максимально экономить, типа 2697v3 + 2 планки по 16. Видяха типа 5700xt или 3060. Если есть больше денег, то лучше уже купить 7500f + самая дешевая мать и память. Промежуточные варианты я не рассматриваю
please get intel b580 and test with 2680 v4. the b580 is slightly stronger than the nvidia 4060 and im only showing a 11% BN for CPU intense tasks ON 1440p. i think were 100% fine with 2690 v4 and b580 but if you could test that would be great... bc thats the best budget 1440p gaming if the 2680 v4 can work with the b580....
@@Miyconst awesome. thats it sir, we all know the 2680 v4 is super cheap and ready on the website and now the b580 has clearly hit the gamers approval and hype... you have one of the best channels and i cant even imagine how many gamers you have helped around the world with all your information and dedication
@@Miyconst 7500f is less than 110 right now on AE!!! Im saving up for 7500f and really just not going to purchase the 2680 v4.. theres no point in 2025 buying 13 year old tech when we can get 7500f for 110
@@Miyconst Keep in mind that the B580 is PCI Express 4.0 x8 (like the RTX 4060) and depends on ReBAR enabled for normal performance. Testing this on a x99 platform with PCIe 3.0 and no ReBAR will lead to a substantial performance loss.
@@Miyconstusing Sodium on Fabric lets you use more than one core for the game (unlike vanilla which is heavily ipc limited) for the Java version, Bedrock should use more cores by default (but runs on anything so testing this version would be pointless imo)
@@Miyconstas for testing methodology I would use the same "seed" at a high render distance (32) in the same spot and record fps maybe while moving around to capture stutters while loading parts of the game (make sure to enable all cores in Sodium settings)
2680v4 не сильно гірший і коштує 15 євро, qyida A5 чудова плата за 45 євро на розпродажах, серверна память локально в моєму регіоні принаймні копійчана - 20 євро за 2х16. за такі гроші краще не зібрати, і відяха на рівні рх6600 достатньо бюджетна та збалансована, виходить нормальний комп за дуже дешево, можна пограти любі ігри. дороще не варта тратити на х99 платформу
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Performance Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Eh5hItD4Mr0/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for all the hard work testing it
and to x99 - it was hell of a ride partner
What do you mean "was"? It still is, for many many users. 😃 Thanks for the support, as always.
@@Miyconst X99? Ha-ha, farewell my X79 setups since 2019 (first edit. - E5 2640+Kllisre X79M3+16Gb DDR3 2133 MHz+RX570 4 Gb, later it grown to E5 2689+Machinist V2.82+32Gb DDR3 2133 MHz+RX5700XT). Those were pretty capable somehow, especially with such a price. Few weeks ago I've shifted to AM4 (R5 5500+Jginyue B550I+16Gb DDR4 3600MHz+RX5700XT) - difference is big, I love my new setup. Thanks for review and hints for this ITX board, you helped me in my quest for a new mini board so much, Miyconst.
@@Miyconst
correct, around the world alot of gamers can still use intel 775 and be very happy.... tech is growing but more than 50% of our world to game can use your vids and 580, b580 to game as they want
It's impressive that a nearly 10 year old platform is still this relevant. There are lots of useful tasks for these machines. I'm still using two x79 Xeon v2s for basic 3D design and programming tasks. They work perfectly fine.
The V2s are still perfectly usable just too slow in many tasks without the AVX instructions and very power inefficient.
I am still using x299 with x9900x and 4 channel memmory, it's still quite good, just like 450 usd mini pc with r7-7845hs 🤣
I got my kid a HP Z440 2697v4 with 1080. Runs games really great and computer is silent. 100x More quiet than my gaming PC. Slava Ukraini!!
1080, you mean a GTX 1080? Yes, it's a very decent combo for an entry level PC. Glory to the Heroes.
Just got a xeon e5 2697a V4 paired with a HP Z440 and RTX 2060 super. An upgrade from xeon 1225 v2 lol. R 5600 build in my country was expensive so xeon ftw
That's a great budget setup and with RTX 2060S you will be GPU limited in most of the cases.
In my opinion X99 is still worth the money if you can find a cheap workstation like I did for $60
thank you sir. I really enjoy the x99 platform. Got several servers with xeon e5 series cpu. Love all those threads :)
Still rocking on my 5930k that will turn 10 in a couple of weeks.
I have an office PC that I lug around with between temp IT jobs. I use it as my main rig for everything. It has all ewaste parts. 1660 v3, x99 ws asus 3 way titan xp. It can play games all the way up to 8k with no issues at all! X99 is immortal!
Correction power usage is the only issue lol
Yeah, E5-1660 V3 is a space heater when overclocked.
Still rocking my 2690 V4 with RTX 3070. Will be upgrading to AM5 next year, probably Ryzen 7700.
Great video K. Now in pt-br!! Good!
*Thanx for the great video and videos my friend* 🫡🫡🫡
great video, as someone still on an old E5-2680 V4 I think a more realistic paring for this kind of cpu is more like an RTX 3060 or Radeon rx 6600xt, meaning a budget system and would be fun to see that in the same testing and see how much the cpu impacts a lower tier graphics card
Brazil 💚, nice video. ☺
🇧🇷🇧🇷
Thank you for doing this still. I always like entry xeon content, even when it's negative. I have built a few rigs with the utter lowest cost options i could get there on ali and off locals, and i am always surprised with the capabilities of even some of the trashiest x99 parts. I would love to see 2640v4 content, that one at an easily accessible $4 each seems too good to be true.. its a shame my $21 white qiyada x99 boards are nowhere near as exceptional😂. A few months ago i couldnt imagine building such usable machines for around 150 usd
On the next year will we see a b580 benchmark on 2011-3?
So many great testst :) If possible id like to see a comparison with 5960x vs xeon e5 vs ryzen 5 / any new platform
I'm playing all the actual games with a E5-2690 V3 3.7GHz 12/12 (Unlock, undervolt, FSB OC), 32GB 2133 quad-channel 12-13-13-27, all the games running at 4K 60FPS Mid/High (FSR balanced) on a 6700 XT, in resume, my GPU is bottlenecking the E5-2690 V3 at 4K 60FPS native, want a upgrade to a 4070 Ti so soon...
thanks for the effort!
bye x99, you've served us well 🤝
hola que maquina usas ahora ?
@@eleonormota919 Todavía uso el viejo Haswell para mi computadora personal, con un procesador E3-1231 v3. Pero pasé de la plataforma X99 a la AM4 para las PC que vendo.
@@wood6454 que bueno que ya te hayas actualizado ,yo estoy en ello jajaja .. saludos
im dreading to ask how much time have you spent compiling all these results, big props
I don't know myself but it's a lot. 😂
are those mobo compatibility with the Arc series graphic cards a good idea ?
I see no reason why it shouldn't be compatible. For the best performance you would have to enable Resizable Bar and that's possible with most of the Chinese X99 motherboards, many latest options even have it as a BIOS menu option.
@@Miyconst ok thanks, i wasnt sure about the resizable bar on x99 ;) ! take care
great extensive details. thanks
it's great platform
unless i3/i5 12th gen or ryzen 5600 2nd become common, xeon will still great value
B mobo + ryzen 5600 is still 2x the price of 2680v4 + mobo after all
Hey I plan to use my 2011-3 machines running with Linux as long as they continue to provide the performance I need.
3 years with my cute xeon e5 2640v3 and my flammable qiyida x99 h-9 motherboard, I don't want to say goodbye xd.
7500f is LESS than 110 right now on AE
its time to save up for am5.... 7500f is ready for the next 10 years and at that price its unbeatable
@@Kevin-vh6nnokay consumer
to be fair id build new if i had the budget and no other reasons to go for other platforms (such as pcie lanes) as well
Does inspectre make a difference in performance on xeons v3 and v4?
I did not run any specific comparisons but people online always ask me to test with Spectre patches disabled, so that's what I do.
Great video as always. But what about produtivity? Do you think the xeon e5 is still relevant in that functionality? A assembled a dual 2697v4 for video editing and a second one for geoprocessing and a think the cost benefit is hard to beat.
If you have a task that scales well across many cores and requires lots of RAM, it's next to impossible to find something more cost effective than LGA 2011-3.
I don't have any experience with video editing, by the way. I just felt an unreal difference compare to the 7th gen i5 my friend had. But... Do you think for premiere use and video compiling it was a god choice ? If not, what do you suggest?
I think that dual socket systems are bad for most of the users but if it works for you and you are happy, I see no reason to go into the "what if" territory. Adobe Premiere is known to favor CPUs with strong single core performance but compared to 7th gen i5, basically anything is strong.
Did you recommend to upgrade from xeon x79 v2 to this new v4 or intel ES mobile cpu with motherboard combo
Great video, thank you!
So, as the resolution increases, will the gap between Xeon and the Ryzen 5 5600 close? For example, will the CPU bottleneck gradually decrease at 2K and 4K resolutions?
It really depends on the game and GPU used. The gap may decrease but you certainly won't get more FPS.
@@Miyconst Thank you!
Que legal, agora o vídeo tem opção de dublagem. É feita por IA?
Yes, it's automatically made by TH-cam AI.
It is youtube feature that is enabled by default on most videos. Yes it is made by AI
As expected the CPU is a beast in modern AC Titles
Good video............. How do they compare in video editing? ............. Again, good thoral job..........
These multi-core Xeons are good for rendering but struggle with live video playback if you apply to many modifiers or effects.
@@Miyconst u mean in DaVinci Resolve or Adobe primer
@@BadBoy11m in general it applies for both but Resolve is known to better utilize multi-core CPUs.
Perhaps these Xeons could be better tested with Hypervisor/VM setups. These CPUs are popular for home servers.
Id personally like to see these comparisons with VMs using the Proxmox hypervisor!
I currently have the Asus X99 IPMI board with an e5-2697 v4. I'm interested in a board with dual 2667 v3 CPUs, turbo unlocked (if possible).
TBU is very problematic with anything but Windows as far as I know. Testing Proxmos I couldn't even get it to boot with TBU, it would lock at startup. Dual socket solutions are designed for a few niche use cases and I don't recommend it for most of the users.
@Miyconst Well, that's disappointing. Thanks for the information!
Can you make gaming and other benchmarks on a dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8180?
I am sorry to disappoint but I can't do. It would be a huge money waste buying these CPUs. Also, for gaming LGA 3647 is useless.
@Miyconst fair enough
It's interesting to see the Xeon either be benefitted or hindered by the memory channels. In some cases quad is better, some cases dual is better. Even more crazy is that the average shows little difference lol.
The long story short: for gaming 4x8GB or 2x16GB makes little to no difference.
@@Miyconst Thank you for all the work you've put into these videos. I have a 2699 V3 in a Machinist B9 board. Slightly better VRM (8 phases vs 6 in most) but I still feel like VRM is limited here especially for the higher core chips.
Is E5-2697A V4 better for gaming then E5-2687W V4?
Yes, E5-2697A V4 is better.
You can really see where extra cores help out. I assume a 5700/5800X would do much better where cores matter than the 5600.
Undoubtedly. The only problem is the price. 😀 Also, it's not about "extra cores" it's about the overall performance of a CPU. Ryzen 7600 is still a 6-core CPU but it performs better than 5800X.
@Miyconst It does, but clearly the IPC and clock improvements of the 5600 aren't enough to cover the lack of cores. That's about it.
With a board that supports resizable bar can you run a arc gpu on a old Xeon system without any huge performance drops?
Yes, you surely can.
The comparison between dual channel and quad channel is really interesting. The most interesting result is my primary use case Fortnite with regard to the 1% lows. A 60% decrease in lows in quad channel relative to dual channel.
Yep.. this is a very weird result but I got it consistently. Please beware that I tested Fortnite with a game replay and live gaming might be different. Also, Fortnite constantly gets updates that also affect performance. So, I would say that both configurations are about the same.
@@Miyconst I will have to test it out. When you record game play do you use an App or a capture card? Which capture card do you recommend if you are using a capture card.
@@augold1681 I record with an Elgato 4k60 pro but it has so many glitches that I can't recommend it.
@@Miyconst One last thing. Are you a Raymond Chandler fan?
@@augold1681 I don't think so, since I don't even know who Raymond Chandler is.
I thought turbo unlock didn't work on V4? Or is it 3.1 always?
That's correct, V4 CPUs don't support TBU but E5-2697A V4 holds 2.8-3.1 GHz in games without any hacks.
hello in 14:21is the left screen stuttering because of the quadchannel?
No, it's because of my video capture card. You can see the frame graph, it's smooth.
@Miyconst oh ok 😅, thank you for your response.
What about Asus Strix X99 Gaming motherboard? Found a good condition used one which is same price as chinese ones in my country. Can I mod it's bios to get turbo all on cores?
Sure, you can, just need to use an external programmer to flash the BIOS.
What about testing with an intel a750? They are really nicely priced at this time.
What exactly should I test? A750 works just fine with X99 when resizable bar is enabled.
@Miyconst Yes i know! I mean about the relative performance. It would be cool to see how the A750/A770 and especially the B580 that is out now would benefit (or not) from switching from X99 to Ryzen.
Will be so interesting to see whith a middle graphics like 6600xt, 6700xt, 3060, 3060ti, 3070. Because the differences will be more shorts.
For CPU testing you have to shift load from GPU to CPU. Testing with an entry level graphics card makes no sense for CPU comparisons.
@Miyconst no, i think whith a middle graphics like 6700xt for example the differences of fps Will be more shorts like the 7900xt. Thinking to cheap PC.
Hello, already asked in another video and you said 2697v4 but, I wanted to metion full prices.
2698v3 35$
2697v3 35$
2697v4 48$
Which one do you prefer? (2698v3 is brand new, not used)
E5-2698 V3 if you plan to apply the TBU hack and don't care about power consumption, E5-2697 V4 otherwise.
@@Miyconst Thank you!
potente xeon piace bravo
4:55 цікаво, що у деяких випадках 2 канали пам'яті на Зіоні працювали швидше за 4 канали. Я би сказав, у більшості випадків. Як так? Ігри на стільки не заточені на 4-канальну пам'ять?
Я зачіпив цей феномен наприкінці відео, якщо коротко то яне експерт з контролерів пам'яті але наскільки мені відомо, якщо планка має два ранги то процесор одночасно може виконати дві операції. Мої 16ГБ модулі дворангові, 8ГБ однорангові.
@Miyconst цікаво все це )
А ще помітив, що на міні-атх материнці відяха не дає використовувати тпм2 модуль. Треба робити якийсь подовжувач на шлейфі )
Ну.. тут залежить від того якого розміру карта. Щодо подовжувачів то це погана ідея. Сигнал затухає та ТПМ не працює.
I have the same CPU..Asrock X99 Taichi with 4x8=32 GB Quad Channel 3000MhZ Ram....Settings:Bus speed 103.6@all core 3.211 MhZ....HT OFF....Memory @1243 MhZ13.13.13.35 421clocks 2T
Play most of the Time Battlefield 2042 @UHD with Low Settings with a GTX 1080TI ....my Frames are 50-70FpS
Well.. GTX 1080 Ti is the obvious bottleneck here.
Meu setup é placa mãe mr9a com 2697a e 64 gb de RAM com uma Rx580, estou vendo para trocar a placa desse meu PC de trabalho.
2666 V3 and v4? Maybe?
E5-2666 V4 I have never seen for a reasonable price and judging by the specs it seems to be pretty bad. The V3 is still competitive with TBU hack.
@@Miyconst I'm useing a V3 in a Z440 for VM's and home-lab stuff rn. Didn't know if you would be interested in a similar comparison or if you already have done one like this in this video vs a Ryzen or another cpu. Just throwing it out there. I'm trying to decide if I want to keep this Z440 or build something else and move on. Appreciate your videos. Have a good one.
I think that it is ironic that the only one game i care about in my personal life plays better on x99 : Battlefield 2042
Do you really play BF2042 or it is just a game you like? I tried playing CQ128 and it's a stuttery mess..
@@Miyconst i play it sometimes, when i have time to update it, always 128 players. I am not too sensitive for stutters in fact... i am used to low specs. The thing i hate is the lack of FSR
Testing quad chanel and dual chanel on qd4/2697v3 and 4 modules 8gb ddr4 desktop. Very minor diference. And in CS2, 2 modules are realy better for everage fps than 4.
Yeah, this is pretty unexpected. I would assume that quad channel configuration should be at least 5% faster.
@Miyconst Not for me) All people try to buy a 4 channel motherboard. Only for numbers in Aida test mem/cash. X2 in read/write speeds. But in games... It is hard to find the difference. That's why on TH-cam I can't find any tests/evidence. Why gamers need 4 channels on xeon. Maybe the loading time will be reduced.
I tested 16gb 2 channels and 32gb 4 channels. 16gb is still good for gaming.
🙂 i just checked and theres a few used X99 motherboards from the major board partners so thats what i would recommend, i dont care for AM4 because thats what everybody is doing already which is boring to me
Sometimes you just want a plain simple and boring solution that just works, especially when building PCs for your relatives. 😃
@@Miyconst 🙂 sure, thanks for the benchmarks
Why so difference between dual and quad channel
Please watch the video or at least its conclusion.
The E5-2697A V4 turns out to be more interesting than the 18-core E5-2697 V4. The E5-2697 V4 for was the biggest disappointment for me at LGA-2011v3, it has too much reduced frequency on all cores.
Yeah, V4 in general is disappointing in terms of frequency. V3 would be a pathetic disaster as well but TBU saved it.
The best e5 for gaming is the 1680v3 at 4.3 ghz, in my opinion.
That's an opinion one may have. 😃
Большая работа проделана, спасибо. Получается выгоднее всего брать эту платформу если максимально экономить, типа 2697v3 + 2 планки по 16. Видяха типа 5700xt или 3060. Если есть больше денег, то лучше уже купить 7500f + самая дешевая мать и память. Промежуточные варианты я не рассматриваю
А зря. Ryzen 5700x3D/5800x3D для игр очень даже интересны.
please get intel b580 and test with 2680 v4.
the b580 is slightly stronger than the nvidia 4060 and im only showing a 11% BN for CPU intense tasks ON 1440p.
i think were 100% fine with 2690 v4 and b580 but if you could test that would be great...
bc thats the best budget 1440p gaming if the 2680 v4 can work with the b580....
It surely can work and it would be a very nice combo for 1440p gaming. Still, what exactly do you want to see tested?
@@Miyconst
awesome. thats it sir, we all know the 2680 v4 is super cheap and ready on the website and now the b580 has clearly hit the gamers approval and hype...
you have one of the best channels and i cant even imagine how many gamers you have helped around the world with all your information and dedication
@@Miyconst
7500f is less than 110 right now on AE!!!
Im saving up for 7500f and really just not going to purchase the 2680 v4.. theres no point in 2025 buying 13 year old tech when we can get 7500f for 110
@@Miyconst
crap, yday the 7500f was 109,
it jumped back up to 125 today... owel thats still a great price
@@Miyconst Keep in mind that the B580 is PCI Express 4.0 x8 (like the RTX 4060) and depends on ReBAR enabled for normal performance. Testing this on a x99 platform with PCIe 3.0 and no ReBAR will lead to a substantial performance loss.
X99 is Dead! Long Live X99!
damn, i was late.
sadly no minecraft...
Man.. I tried. Testing Minecraft is a total mindduck.
@@Miyconstusing Sodium on Fabric lets you use more than one core for the game (unlike vanilla which is heavily ipc limited) for the Java version, Bedrock should use more cores by default (but runs on anything so testing this version would be pointless imo)
@@Miyconstas for testing methodology I would use the same "seed" at a high render distance (32) in the same spot and record fps maybe while moving around to capture stutters while loading parts of the game (make sure to enable all cores in Sodium settings)
2680v4 не сильно гірший і коштує 15 євро, qyida A5 чудова плата за 45 євро на розпродажах, серверна память локально в моєму регіоні принаймні копійчана - 20 євро за 2х16. за такі гроші краще не зібрати, і відяха на рівні рх6600 достатньо бюджетна та збалансована, виходить нормальний комп за дуже дешево, можна пограти любі ігри. дороще не варта тратити на х99 платформу
Згоден на всі сто, але E5-2680 V4 значно повільніший за E5-2697A V4 в забавках, звичайно, якщо відео карта вивозить.
Проц все ж краще 2667v4 або 2690v4, вони обидва зараз в районі 20$ коштують.