In English, the pronunciation “SWAY-bee-en” is correct, as it is named for the area historically known as the Duchy of Swabia. In German: Schwaben. You have lovely hair!
@@thewhitedoncheadle8345That is true, the Suebi came from the Baltic Sea, so modern day Pomerania, and South Sweden, but later they traveled south, mixed with Celts, the Suebi then moved to Iberia, but quite a lot of them Stayed, these people live in the Swabian Area, and were later part of the Alamanni tribe, so the Swabians, as well as the Badians, East Swiss and so on, all descent from the Alemanni and therefore also have Suebian origin.
Nope. Not even close. Suebian even BEGINS by separating hair into 2 parts. And, all is done to the side of the head. Also tightens itself..no pinning necessary. Nice video though.
Not quite correct. The Suebian knot is / was worn by male, and some female warriors on the right upper side of the head and the tail went back through the loop. This stopped the knot comming loose in battle and obscuring the vision. The main reason for the knot being on the upper right was because it was easier than tie for the right arm. Why? Simply because the right arm was the sword arm, and was muscle-bound due to contact use with a heavy sword. This makes it difficult to tie at the back of the head. The Suebian knot is still in use by our clan, (an Outlaw Moter Cycle Club)
If you are speaking of the style throughout history, then not as far as I know. But we can make hairstyle history ourselves and wear it on the back of the head, no rules about it. As far as I know the historic versions were worn on the side of the head close to the forehead. Hope this helps.
And of course it may have been worn on the back of the head but no pictorial or physical evidence of this has survived the centuries. There is so much we don't know about the past.
Then it's not a Suebian knot. We can't "make hairstyle history ourselves". The Suebian knot is a hairstyle documented by Tacitus, several bog finds and a substantial amount of pictorial evidence. Your argument is ad ignorantiam and in this case, where there is a lot of pictorial and physical evidence of the appearance of the ancient Germans in general (yet none that would support your claim), it can be disregarded with a fair amount of certainty.
The term "Suebian knot" refers to the actual method of tying the knot. You can tie a rope in a Suebian knot. It doesn't always refer to a hair style. It is a Suebian knot whether it is on the side or the back of the head, just as a Celtic knot is a Celtic knot wherever it is placed on the head. Just because there is not a carving or description of a person wearing a Suebian knot at the back of the head, it doesn't mean no one ever through out history wore it that way. You cannot say that it never happened, because neither you nor I were there to know. We can only assume. Sometimes those assumptions are correct and sometimes not. In any case, there are people wearing the Suebian knot at the back of the head. Yet if You Tube doesn't survive into the future, no one from the future will ever realise that it was worn this way. We do make hairstyle history ourselves, you make it with your hair style, I make it with mine. We all make up hairstyle history. Of course your views may differ and that's fine. Thank you for responding to my video.
I'm afraid I have to correct you, a Suebian knot is a male Roman period hairstyle. You cannot make a hairstyle on a piece of rope. See Tacitus - Germania 38, also the Osterby man and the Dätgen man or the reliefs on the Trajan column. The Celtic knot is, as far as I know, a pictorial ornamentation style, so it's hardly relevant here. You're repeating the argumentum ad ignorantiam I have pointed out earlier. By your logic, I can claim that ancient Egyptians rode unicorns and you can never prove me wrong because no evidence survived over the millenia. True, we can only make assumtions about the past, but we can't make stuff up if there are various kinds of evidence, in this case, of the Subeian knot. There is no evidence of whatever it is you're tying in the video. Maybe it was worn, but again - it's misleading to call it a Suebian knot.
Which is why it probably says "MY VERSION OF..." You nitpickers need to learn to read - and need to learn some manners at that. The creator of this video has addressed this nonsense several times on here already.
I can read very well. Thank you. It still has nothing to do with a Suebian Knot (Suebenknoten). You should have written better: "my version of a beautiful hair". Looks really good synonymous. So no reason to feel attacked. All the best ;)
![Suebenknoten - Suebian Knot [German with Engl. subs]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3CTf6mNHFPE/mqdefault.jpg)
In English, the pronunciation “SWAY-bee-en” is correct, as it is named for the area historically known as the Duchy of Swabia. In German: Schwaben. You have lovely hair!
Thank you:)
no its not suebia was in the north of germany, swabia is in the south of germany
@@thewhitedoncheadle8345That is true, the Suebi came from the Baltic Sea, so modern day Pomerania, and South Sweden, but later they traveled south, mixed with Celts, the Suebi then moved to Iberia, but quite a lot of them Stayed, these people live in the Swabian Area, and were later part of the Alamanni tribe, so the Swabians, as well as the Badians, East Swiss and so on, all descent from the Alemanni and therefore also have Suebian origin.
Nope. Not even close. Suebian even BEGINS by separating hair into 2 parts. And, all is done to the side of the head. Also tightens itself..no pinning necessary. Nice video though.
I agree.
Thank you, as she states , its her version, therefore she should call it something else, in respect to the ancient warriors that wore it.
Not quite correct.
The Suebian knot is / was worn by male, and some female warriors on the right upper side of the head and the tail went back through the loop.
This stopped the knot comming loose in battle and obscuring the vision.
The main reason for the knot being on the upper right was because it was easier than tie for the right arm.
Why? Simply because the right arm was the sword arm, and was muscle-bound due to contact use with a heavy sword.
This makes it difficult to tie at the back of the head.
The Suebian knot is still in use by our clan, (an Outlaw Moter Cycle Club)
Awesome, thank you!
Is there any evidence of Suebian knots tied at the back of the head?
If you are speaking of the style throughout history, then not as far as I know. But we can make hairstyle history ourselves and wear it on the back of the head, no rules about it. As far as I know the historic versions were worn on the side of the head close to the forehead. Hope this helps.
And of course it may have been worn on the back of the head but no pictorial or physical evidence of this has survived the centuries. There is so much we don't know about the past.
Then it's not a Suebian knot. We can't "make hairstyle history ourselves". The Suebian knot is a hairstyle documented by Tacitus, several bog finds and a substantial amount of pictorial evidence.
Your argument is ad ignorantiam and in this case, where there is a lot of pictorial and physical evidence of the appearance of the ancient Germans in general (yet none that would support your claim), it can be disregarded with a fair amount of certainty.
The term "Suebian knot" refers to the actual method of tying the knot. You can tie a rope in a Suebian knot. It doesn't always refer to a hair style. It is a Suebian knot whether it is on the side or the back of the head, just as a Celtic knot is a Celtic knot wherever it is placed on the head. Just because there is not a carving or description of a person wearing a Suebian knot at the back of the head, it doesn't mean no one ever through out history wore it that way. You cannot say that it never happened, because neither you nor I were there to know. We can only assume. Sometimes those assumptions are correct and sometimes not.
In any case, there are people wearing the Suebian knot at the back of the head. Yet if You Tube doesn't survive into the future, no one from the future will ever realise that it was worn this way.
We do make hairstyle history ourselves, you make it with your hair style, I make it with mine. We all make up hairstyle history.
Of course your views may differ and that's fine. Thank you for responding to my video.
I'm afraid I have to correct you, a Suebian knot is a male Roman period hairstyle. You cannot make a hairstyle on a piece of rope. See Tacitus - Germania 38, also the Osterby man and the Dätgen man or the reliefs on the Trajan column. The Celtic knot is, as far as I know, a pictorial ornamentation style, so it's hardly relevant here.
You're repeating the argumentum ad ignorantiam I have pointed out earlier. By your logic, I can claim that ancient Egyptians rode unicorns and you can never prove me wrong because no evidence survived over the millenia.
True, we can only make assumtions about the past, but we can't make stuff up if there are various kinds of evidence, in this case, of the Subeian knot. There is no evidence of whatever it is you're tying in the video. Maybe it was worn, but again - it's misleading to call it a Suebian knot.
This isn't a Suebian Knot.
I agree.
Most people don't know its history.
das ist kein Suebenknoten! sorry
Which is why it probably says "MY VERSION OF..." You nitpickers need to learn to read - and need to learn some manners at that. The creator of this video has addressed this nonsense several times on here already.
I can read very well. Thank you. It still has nothing to do with a Suebian Knot (Suebenknoten). You should have written better: "my version of a beautiful hair". Looks really good synonymous. So no reason to feel attacked. All the best ;)
Yes, it either is, or it isn't, right? No bad manners here that I can see. @@GermaniaLibera
It's not a bloody Suebian knot.
It's your version of a knot worn in the wrong fucken place.
Call it something else.
be nice to see you do more things with your hair on video I enjoy watching them
Thank you for watching. There will be more videos coming, hopefully soon :)
looks nice
Thank you Richard.
Better title not-Suebian knot :D
Awesome. I wish I had hair. It all fell out. 😢
This is nothing like the swabian knot on the Danish bog body.
I never said it was. It's "my" version. :)
@@SarahlabyrinthLHC
Then if it's your version call it something else.
This is not a suebian knot … at all
you have nice hair never cut it
Thank you, I have no plans to cut it :)