Profits, sovereignty and security: The battle for the new space economy | Business Beyond

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2024
  • The global space economy is booming and is expected to be worth at least $1 trillion by 2040. And it’s not all about sending billionaires like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos to space. In this edition of DW Business Beyond, we explore the future economy of the final frontier- from space tourism to satellites-and who is setting the rules.
    Our experts:
    Namrata Goswami
    Independent Space Policy Scholar
    Angela Hart
    NASA Commercial Low-Earth Orbit Program Manager
    Jens Kauffmann
    European Space Agency
    Marshall Smith
    Senior Vice President of Commercial Space Stations
    Nanoracks
    Ruy Pinto
    Chief Technology Officer
    Satellite company SES
    Anna Green
    Mobile Planetarium and Exhibitions Director
    Stiftung Planetarium Berlin
    Subscribe: th-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch

ความคิดเห็น • 422

  • @precious5605
    @precious5605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The truth is more important than the facts. Access to productive information is what we all need to become successful in life. To possibly create wealth good enough to retire, proficiency is indeed necessary; causing most affluent entrepreneurs to acquire the synergy of wealth managers that offers high-net-worth operations that encompasses all parts of a person’s financial life. Get yourself an aid

    • @theodorerossi7998
      @theodorerossi7998 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Our perceptions of your approach influence how we interpret, understand, and act on the truth.
      It’s so true that rich individuals seek the knowledge and skills of professionals and claim to achieve their success without any prior help

    • @precious5605
      @precious5605 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Elizabeth Green To achieve your goals, proficiency makes your plans a reality. I engage in compound interest and leveraging and as well operate exclusive packages with a body of a wealth management firm and so far I’ve attained good ROI (amount is confidential)

    • @precious5605
      @precious5605 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As to get more details on the wealth manager, easily do quick internet research; (Genevieve Glen Rogers) where I believe you can easily approach her from, do your research with her full names mentioned.

    • @svenoliver6040
      @svenoliver6040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks that makes the most sense

    • @c.k2778
      @c.k2778 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a shocker seeing Genevieve Glen Rogers being mentioned here. I always had mixed feelings about hiring a lnvestment advisor. For the record, I started working with Genevieve in 2018, and she manages about 70% of my lnvestments, while I manage the other 30%. My philosophy is that I care more about my own money than anyone else, but she made me accept that they have wealth of information on current conditions and future trends

  • @treborsirrah7916
    @treborsirrah7916 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Musk is the only one of those 3 who has actually got rockets and people into space

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But those other two are already so far ahead of the rest.

    • @LuisPereira-bn8jq
      @LuisPereira-bn8jq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Tounguepunchfartbox Except they aren't... There are a few other space companies, that you haven't heard about because they aren't owned by billionaires, that are substantially ahead of Bezos' and Brandson's companies.
      Currently SpaceX is the "Usain Bolt" of space companies, if you will, beating all the competition by tremendous margins. Bezo's and Brandson's companies are maybe around 5th to 7th place in the "race", probably lower.

    • @icebulletice6195
      @icebulletice6195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the only seat that can potentionally be affordable to regular people is Virgin, even if its not technically space.

    • @coryryder9070
      @coryryder9070 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      then you dont understand secret space program military industrial complexand why nasa was always a straight answer space x and more is just to privatize moon and space for elite

    • @dougspace6734
      @dougspace6734 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, technically New Shepard is a rocket and pokes into space.

  • @michaelmcgarrity6987
    @michaelmcgarrity6987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    A good topic. We are seeing so much diversity and innovation in this field now. Competition seems to be driving a great deal of novelty.

    • @user-cr6yp7vx9r
      @user-cr6yp7vx9r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There most likely will be a food shortage soon, why on earth is anyone worrying about space competition?

    • @michaelmcgarrity6987
      @michaelmcgarrity6987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-cr6yp7vx9r Billionaires don't worry much of Food. Bezos, Gates, Musk all love Rockets so expect to see Rockets. I didn't invent it, but I shall enjoy watching the new Space Race. Neural Link is interesting too. I give to Charity and help the Poor. I also enjoy watching New Technology and the benefits it provides. Neural Link may enable paralyzed people to function. Space Exploration may have many, yet unknown benefits such as the devices we are using now which had much of their Origins in 1980s Space Program Technology Development such as Telecommunication Satellites and Computing

  • @meejinhuang
    @meejinhuang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    SpaceX has a huge lead over all the others. They're not the first to bring tourists, but they are aiming far higher than the rest.

    • @ziziroberts8041
      @ziziroberts8041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imaginary tourists at this point.
      Billionaires taking selfies in space the exception.

    • @Gozne
      @Gozne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talking about bubbles what about a bubble about something that dont even exists? LOL

    • @Mic_Glow
      @Mic_Glow 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes but Mars is a pr stunt. I think Elon knows the Moon has to be the first to be colonized. 1 second communication delay, has useful resources, good testbed, lots of science to be done (including huge telescopes), lots of people interested - way more would pay for a vacation on the moon over moving permanently to Mars. At least not until there is infrastructure on Mars. Early stage of colonization will be hardcore.. far worse than working on south pole.

    • @harvirdhindsa3244
      @harvirdhindsa3244 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      SpaceX is taking on a very specific role as a launch provider. They are not encompassing all of Space economy related opportunities.

    • @Gozne
      @Gozne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harvirdhindsa3244 I would call it the most expensive and useless fireworks ever. The only use they have is to fool retarded people to believe we can go to the moon.

  • @xianxiaemperor1438
    @xianxiaemperor1438 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I hope a ''Global Space-Industrial Complex'' is established soon :-))

  • @lucasjames7524
    @lucasjames7524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Chelsea Delaney is excellent, and DW is excellent! Great content, as always! 🙂

    • @NumberOneScientist
      @NumberOneScientist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ......... You are indeed correct -- AND Chelsea Delaney has a voice so clear, so soothing to listen to -- a delight to ones ears ......... and DW presents a truly very informative content !!!

  • @emzee1148
    @emzee1148 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Its hard to compare SpaceX and the two tourist companies tbh... it kinda botches the thesis.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The tech has the same objective.

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samsonsoturian6013 It doesn't. Branson has no goal apart from space tourism (and maybe making money, eventually).
      Bezos want's to build factories in Earth orbit while Musk wants to settle Mars.
      Three very different objectives.

  • @badrinair
    @badrinair 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @adripiom2444
    @adripiom2444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i like your content

  • @myungsukim
    @myungsukim 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mechanical enginnering, attracative. German and Mr. Musk understood. Appreciated.

  • @opg9712
    @opg9712 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    DW is osmmmmm

  • @akteno2796
    @akteno2796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's not gonna be Russia...

  • @Atipat12
    @Atipat12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AMAZING 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @ziziroberts8041
    @ziziroberts8041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The world better start searching for win-win scenarios or there won't be any winners.

    • @andresmorales5807
      @andresmorales5807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You´re wrong. The present day framework is the best way for there to be one or a few big winners, and it is perfect as it is.

    • @ziziroberts8041
      @ziziroberts8041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andresmorales5807 You're absolutely bot. Adios.

  • @cacogenicist
    @cacogenicist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Video starts out referencing Falcon 9's reusable booster capability, while showing video of Starship prototype tests. Ugh. Typical of DW.
    I couldn't watch the rest.

  • @CAStone-kq4md
    @CAStone-kq4md 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wall Street sends the Bubble to space !

    • @ibrahimdiiriye2180
      @ibrahimdiiriye2180 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @pia3612pio
      @pia3612pio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ibrahimdiiriye2180 I in a flash too many things I've

  • @nilsfrederking62
    @nilsfrederking62 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The huge advantage of SpaceX´s Starlink is, that the satellites can reenter earth atmosphere without any remaining debris. The problem with debris is that it could increase exponentially, as every part hitting a satellite can split in more parts, the parts will become smaller and smaller but nonetheless, even a 1 cm particle can cause some serious damage to a satellite.

    • @dr4d1s
      @dr4d1s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I get what you are saying but most (not all) satellites burn up when they reenter the atmosphere, heck most things do unless they are made not too or are really big. Most modern satellites are even designed to deorbit themselves when they get too old, run out of propellant, are damaged, or reach the end of their life.
      I do applaud SpaceX's goal of trying to keep LEO clear of debris from their satellites. Their design and plans are obviously doing well at that so far. Which is a good thing, because there is going to be like 30,000 of them up there.

    • @uswwt
      @uswwt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I could be totally wrong. But all LEO satellites get the re-enter burn-up feature for free? They so so close to Earth that they get atmosphere drag. They carry some fuels to occasionally pop them up. When the fuel is used up, they will just fall and burn up. If they go farther out to avoid the drag, that are in MEO or GEO.

    • @isa_L
      @isa_L 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      dont worry, communication and internet exist because of Server, W-iSP tower, base transceivers tower, WACS, and Fiber optic cable connected around the continent

    • @BBBrasil
      @BBBrasil 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@uswwt Yes you are right. Many problems with that "free feature", though.
      If you are nearest to Earth, lowest orbit, de-orbit is simple. Just save enough propulsion for manoeuvring falling over open ocean.
      Orbits are about altitude and vectors, like 3-D car lanes if you will, the higher the faster, but also direction and profile, how perfectly round orbit or elipsoidal it is.
      De-orbit means spend fuel to decelerate and to do it in the right direction and angle. You have to invest on that feature to do it safe and precise.
      Old space race artifacts are still up there and we have no way to predict where and when they will fall 😕
      Edit: The higher you go, less drag, sure, GEO has no discernible drag, but no orbit is perfectly stable. There are gravitational perturbations that, cumulatively, will significantly change the orbit, you have to have propulsion to account for it and correct the orbit whenever needed. The perturbations, drag included, will make the orbit more and more an elipse. One of the dangers is that changing lanes that come with apogee and perigee, highest and lowest altitude, lowest and highest speeds. Without attitude control (the control of vector of movement), even the lowest orbit can be a mess.

    • @smoochie3331
      @smoochie3331 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@isa_L land line phone FTW LOL

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The US is still decades ahead of the world

    • @liitkgp6570
      @liitkgp6570 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not ahead of china

    • @deprogramm
      @deprogramm ปีที่แล้ว

      @@liitkgp6570 way ahead of China. Hence why chinas rover died soon after it landed. While Nasas is still going

  • @jamesfunnyvideos
    @jamesfunnyvideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    16:04 At least one of those people cannot be held at their word...

  • @SahilP2648
    @SahilP2648 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's the morse code blinking lady from the pandemic days

  • @jasperangel2057
    @jasperangel2057 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a fan here in the Philippines 🌴😁💗

  • @BBBrasil
    @BBBrasil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Correction, it is a playground for Bezos and Branson, both made a point to have a seat on their first joy ride. Edit: yippee ki-yay Kármán line touch and back.
    Musk is about hard business.
    Not that tourism isn't a business, but SpaceX actually has a business of actual orbital launching, and Musk didn't get to behave as an adrenalin junkie.
    SpaceX's first all-private orbital mission, Inspiration4, was actually about science and St. Jude's cancer hospital charity. A far cry from joy rides.

  • @jewcedman2074
    @jewcedman2074 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very well put together. You touched on many different topics that all feed into answering the questions with how this is different from the first space race. The nation(s) that lead in this area will be the leading superpower(s) for the next century to come, in a big way. This was a great top level discussion that has many areas that can be expanded on. Please keep up the good work!

    • @mkkrupp2462
      @mkkrupp2462 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a dream…Modern civilisation will be well and truly over by “the next century” because of energy descent, ecological devastation, pollution of seas , oceans and rivers, water shortages, loss of arable soils, climate change and the increasing likelihood of nuclear war.
      The Fermi Paradox will apply to us.

  • @acemax1124
    @acemax1124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *I HAVE THE HIGH GROUND* 💡🤔

  • @abelardogreen
    @abelardogreen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damnit

  • @lancemarchetti8673
    @lancemarchetti8673 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice work!

  • @dansmith3vdhrj
    @dansmith3vdhrj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The writer of this piece draws a picture that vastly understates SpaceX's lead in this "race"..

    • @MrTaxiRob
      @MrTaxiRob 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soyuz is the most successful launch system in history

    • @alpineiii7933
      @alpineiii7933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@MrTaxiRob legit who asked not even kidding

    • @MrTaxiRob
      @MrTaxiRob 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alpineiii7933 what race is SpaceX winning? How much mass have they launched? Legit why are you such a bootlicker not even kidding

    • @dansmith3vdhrj
      @dansmith3vdhrj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bet the first people to see steel-hulled ships vs. wooden masted ships of the line, or automobiles vs. horse-drawn carriages for that matter would have said the same, with similar pride..

    • @alpineiii7933
      @alpineiii7933 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrTaxiRob what, im not even boot licking

  • @blacked2987
    @blacked2987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *Germany 🇩🇪, Europe need to dominate the Space Mining industry of the belt*

  • @Whooopsnobodybusinessactually
    @Whooopsnobodybusinessactually 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Space belongs to whoever can take it

  • @desfordjames4040
    @desfordjames4040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a idea what about space hospitals.

  • @xavariusquest4603
    @xavariusquest4603 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It would be beneficial to present a primer on space utilization as it currently stands and why it is used this way.

  • @robertlee8805
    @robertlee8805 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @DW You're going to have to have follow-ups on these topics. Please cover all aspects of these topics. Cleaning up Space Debris, old satellites, how far/close builds can be developed, international space laws, acceptable social behaviors, design, Living quality, safety requirements, speed limits, minimum/max life of builds.

  • @charlesmnadeau
    @charlesmnadeau 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent. Thank you.

  • @Atipat12
    @Atipat12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    COOL 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

  • @urimtefiki226
    @urimtefiki226 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    31.10.2019

  • @Gorilder
    @Gorilder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The US, and it's not even close the only conversation is between the various US companies(in which case Space X and ULA... Rocketlab might be catching up soon too.. they're a US/NZ company so they're at least 1 partially international player in competition with the all American giants)

    • @HypaWave1701
      @HypaWave1701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed doing a more in depth report on the space industry would have been more professional.

  • @odt4492
    @odt4492 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    more chelsea delaney please.

  • @pr7638
    @pr7638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    only thing we'll know for sure, its not going to be europe.. esa is so ponderous and bureaucratic

    • @robrechwithoutzaza7992
      @robrechwithoutzaza7992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ESA is doing significantly more beneficial activities for the whole of humanity than all other space agencies. It just doesn't have a good PR.

    • @MrTaxiRob
      @MrTaxiRob 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know about bureaucracy, but Ariane is a very good launch system, and ESA doesn't have the same volume of military payloads funding them like US or China

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrTaxiRob SpaceX is mopping the floor with everyone because they have partially reusable rockets. And they are working feverishly on the largest rocket ever built - which will be 100% reusable.
      Ariane is not reusable at all. Of course Europe will keep the program alive because we want to have our own access to space. But Ariane really can't compete at this point. The only reason anyone will buy in at all is because SpaceX keeps its prices high to fund further development. If they wanted to they could lower launch prices considerably and drive everyone else out of the market.

    • @MrTaxiRob
      @MrTaxiRob 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@harmless6813 reusability is a red herring that you've all fallen victim to. And no, they CAN'T lower launch prices any further, I don't know where you get that nonsense from.

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrTaxiRob You have mentioned exactly zero arguments for your claims.

  • @Strelokos666
    @Strelokos666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    13:16 in a post cold war world she said....

  • @edwardkay3193
    @edwardkay3193 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait for the aliens to sweep everyone away.

    • @jayc1139
      @jayc1139 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would aliens have waited all this time, till now, when we're on the verge of living on another planet, to 'sweep us away'? They had plenty of time in history to 'sweep'. I think they're just curious and observing...kinda like Star Trek and its Prime Directive. Observe but don't interfere, even if there's a threat to the planet.

  • @isa_L
    @isa_L 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    did you mean,
    building more 5 gen w-isp tower?
    High NA faster fiber optic hardware? getting new computer servers that have faster computing and rendering capabilities? more terabytes hard drives? faster wi-fi hardware?
    i should have known that earlier
    pffft 🤭

  • @GameUnCrafter
    @GameUnCrafter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The concept is great. "All countries should have equal opportunity in space." But, putting that into practice is all but impossible.

  • @Theoryofcatsndogs
    @Theoryofcatsndogs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    SpaceX is very different than BO and Virgin. They actually sent humans to real space, send cargo to outer space and a working high-power rocket engine. The other 2 are mainly for tourists and tiny cargo to very low orbit.

    • @JamesBideaux
      @JamesBideaux 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      BO brings nothing to orbit, Virgin Galactic brings nothing to orbit. Virgin orbit brings satelites to orbit.

  • @darploin5071
    @darploin5071 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we do not come up with a common ground set up for space it will be the next battlefield

  • @theobserver9131
    @theobserver9131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We need to put together an X prize to inspire people to develop a space debris cleanup scheme. As usual, we are waiting until too late to try to solve a serious problem. We need to get on it now! It's only gonna get worse.

    • @seandepagnier
      @seandepagnier 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      its already too late

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@seandepagnier no it's not. We have plenty of satellites including a space station orbiting just fine, only needing to make occasional adjustments to avoid collision. We can still launch vehicles out of orbit and off to other places. It's not too late.

    • @seandepagnier
      @seandepagnier 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theobserver9131 it is too late, because once there are a few collisions there will be a chain reaction. After, this space cannot be used for hundreds to thousands of years. There are already far too many satellites.

  • @AstinelPGR
    @AstinelPGR 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a coincidence NASA is also going to the Moon again called Artemis.

  • @Discover-Hidden
    @Discover-Hidden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chelsey Delaney 💜💜😊

  • @raa137
    @raa137 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    while this report is full of good information, I think a big driver in space exploration and development has been driven by military interests of governments. I wish the report could have put that into the perspective of past space efforts and for the future.

  • @Bultish
    @Bultish 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would say we have re-usability when the cost to launch drops x10. Don't believe the hype

  • @yingtianyu4129
    @yingtianyu4129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's the point living and working in space?

    • @ihl0700677525
      @ihl0700677525 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Similar question probably asked by Ming emperor to admiral Zheng He. What's the point exploring the Southern Sea and settling in foreign land?
      Meanwhile European monarchs, merchants, and settlers spend enormous amount of money and resources to explore the world and start new colonies.
      Guess who benefit more in the long term.

  • @Atipat12
    @Atipat12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TIME TO #MARS 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

  • @paulroberts665
    @paulroberts665 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The economy is your drive to go and space but there are no deep thoughts

    • @mrloop1530
      @mrloop1530 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Those are all certainly words

  • @HypaWave1701
    @HypaWave1701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope Rocket Lab $RKLB Neutron Rocket will be ready soon!

  • @MultiExtrovert
    @MultiExtrovert 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have been watching Chelsey all this episode 😛

  • @hlitharland
    @hlitharland 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The vocal fry!

  • @abelardogreen
    @abelardogreen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the expense of everyone

  • @peternelligan6780
    @peternelligan6780 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NORMAN LEAR IS STILL ALIVE 101 OLD JUDY COLLINS STEVE STILLS ALBUM

  • @carpenter3069
    @carpenter3069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah, ground-based telescopes are a bad investment. Sorry. Horses were nice too.

  • @ThompPL1
    @ThompPL1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uuummm . . . Define "Space" *first* before deciding on who owns/controls it ?!! . . . it's IN FACT a virtually INFINITE resource from LEO to edge of Universe !!

  • @nomadgaming84
    @nomadgaming84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    lets spend trilions while people still die of hunger great job!!! go space

  • @Homeschoolsw6
    @Homeschoolsw6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:14..." Provence of @ll mankind "

  • @angelmatos9143
    @angelmatos9143 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    SpaceX.

  • @ugbalaarya5213
    @ugbalaarya5213 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Miki mouse win end of the day

  • @carpenter3069
    @carpenter3069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah, the international waters is an obvious precedent.

  • @taochangrong8262
    @taochangrong8262 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm Chinese. I hope you will continue to keep your ideas. ha-ha

  • @robertcoulson483
    @robertcoulson483 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have come a long way from laying on blankets in our front yards as we watched Sputnik going across the night sky.

  • @rickjames18
    @rickjames18 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We are certainly going to have issues with the first come first serve setup. We can't even agree on the Arctic. Example would be China claiming to be a near Arctic power which is just a nice way of saying I have no border with the Arctic, but I do now because I want some resources. I can see conflict breaking out in space especially if countries start finding ways to get resources from other planets.

    • @ihl0700677525
      @ihl0700677525 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep, this will be just like during the Age of Exploration, when European powers scrambled to get some territories/colonies in the then recently discovered Americas.
      The first to arrive will naturally have the ability to choose the best locations and claim the largest territory. SpaceX might became the new EIC or VOC.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ihl0700677525
      Actually that would be China.
      They are leading in space technology right now. It's just Western media doesn't show it.

    • @ihl0700677525
      @ihl0700677525 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ajaykumarsingh702 Lol. Maybe. Time will tell.
      The Chinese used to be the leader during the Age of Exploration too, when admiral Zheng He's treasure ship explore the Southern Seas.
      But we know how, in the end, private corporations (e.g. EIC, VOC, Virginia Company, Hudson Bay company, etc) overtook nation states and became the winners of that period.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ihl0700677525
      Those companies got the lead because they turned from explorers to colonists.
      That was not the case with China.
      But this rise in space technology is serious because China is actually militarizing it.

    • @rickjames18
      @rickjames18 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ajaykumarsingh702 What is not the case? As for space, why do you think China is leading? the media may not show it but that is not the only way to get information. Matter of fact, Chinese experts themselves have been pushing for more funding as they say the Americans are pushing the lead. Space X, Virgin, private industry has made massive strides in recent years even NASA is changing course. The Chinese have made huge leaps but they are still far behind the leaders in space. I am curios, what research or article etc did you read to think that? Is it the Chinese space station? Just to give you an idea, the US accounts for 1/3 of all space exploration at the moment. I personally was hoping Europe would get on board but it they will join the yanks.

  • @ChiakiShirakawa
    @ChiakiShirakawa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    日本の内閣府のグロテスクなムーンショット計画の一環かと思たわ。

  • @jieli3313
    @jieli3313 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The house price in Pudong, Shanghai is very high! Face the Shanghai lockdown order ! We don't know how long this house price can hanging on! not falling down!

  • @slevinshafel9395
    @slevinshafel9395 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    9:25 eactly what happen with that subject? i ask that because of starlink. but what happen if Europe tomorow want make another starlink web? or China or Rusia we end up with milions of satelite make the same thing.
    i think this most be treated like internation water or even an update laws. for example mining a close asteroid to my actual mining asteroid. and this mus be signed by China and Rusia. Dont sign dont mean you can arrive there and get it. I say that because LUNA. China dont sigh the international agrement where all outerspace cant be claime as teritorial of one country. So if China put a man tomorow on the moon can say this land of part of it is our. But USA arrived first and put a flag there, but they agree the territory is unclaimable but China dont singup.
    In teory moon is territory of USA if dont sign the internationa agrement.

  • @sukbadaimonghol1089
    @sukbadaimonghol1089 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And who will die first in space?

  • @DavidSmith-kd8mw
    @DavidSmith-kd8mw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Two points:
    1) Optical interference from LEO is a problem in the morning and evening. There are some research areas where you might need those hours for observations, but at least mention this fact.
    2) There seems to be a distinctly naive flavor to this discussion. Governments are poor resource allocators and might never be able to generate more goods and services than they consume in the pursuit of the benefits from these newer space applications. Some businesses are very good at resource allocation but will only pursue these activities if they have the possibility of a return on investment that matches the risks.

  • @Kenneth_James
    @Kenneth_James 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only 1 real player. SpaceX

  • @Processortr
    @Processortr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are so optimistic about the space industry, about the conquest of the moon and so on, and if the additional costs of food, fuel and electricity in the world increase two or three times. how are you going to fly to the moon? today reconnaissance satellites and satellites for remote sensing of the Earth, as well as navigation satellites, will be relevant. and in the near future we can expect military satellites that will carry weapons and will have to destroy enemy satellites.

  • @andresmorales5807
    @andresmorales5807 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why should entities that did not assume any cost or risk whatsoever, benefit from the effort of the ones that did?

    • @p-j-y-d
      @p-j-y-d 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Network effects.

    • @andresmorales5807
      @andresmorales5807 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@p-j-y-d what do you mean?

  • @computerjantje
    @computerjantje 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you try to be a serious youtube channel then get your sound right. The s is so terrible it broke my glass in front of the computer and there are changes in sound constantly. Don't you know that audio is the most important part of video? :)

  • @hgdfshaebia2488
    @hgdfshaebia2488 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a citizen Ihave less than $5.00. Can same one take me to the space, pls?

  • @tribalypredisposed
    @tribalypredisposed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yes, for the benefit of all mankind is a great ideal. At the same time, SpaceX, for example, is not just trying to make money but to provide high speed internet access to everyone around the world, which is a benefit for all mankind. Individual countries or international bodies were never going to achieve this, because first they would have to achieve reusable rockets and so on. Sure, we can ask what happens when other nations or companies become capable of doing what SpaceX can do now, is it fair for SpaceX to get the LEO space instead of them just because they are first. The alternative is that everyone who has poor or no access to the internet has to wait for these others though, I think SpaceX should get the LEO orbit because they are both first and using it in a way that benefits humanity.

    • @lemonrand1
      @lemonrand1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's a Land grab in space.. given money and technology is not an issue.. what is the best orbit to occupy? there only so many orbit that is available for maximum value. It's first come first served.. the understanding of space is for all mankind be damned... kessler syndrome ? till it happen I'll earn my millions first..

    • @uswwt
      @uswwt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's just your opinion, man. LOL. Now that China has a great firewall for their "internet". Do you think China will allow StarLink to operate there? GPS is also widely used globally. Why do you think other countries still sending their own GPS satellites up there? Many countries will want their own solution for independence. So others will for sure send their own satellites to crowd up LEO. Pretty soon satellites probably will have to be armed with collision avoidance systems. LOL.

    • @lemonrand1
      @lemonrand1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@uswwt maybe you Shd find out why SpaceX chose that orbit ..

  • @bingsterc7621
    @bingsterc7621 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's all good and all, but what makes you even think that Xi and The CCP will actually follow any of the rules/laws regarding Space that all other Countries will agree upon?

  • @mobelanger5248
    @mobelanger5248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was wondering, what if during a confrontation, an enemy causes a high quantity of debris in Starlink's orbits. Can he destroy the whole thing?

    • @tribalypredisposed
      @tribalypredisposed 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are 2,000 satellites in orbit for SpaceX. The plan is for a many as 40,000 eventually. An enemy would need an extraordinary number of rockets that can reach Low Earth Orbit to target all of those satellites spread out all over Low Earth Orbit, and the cost for the enemy of doing that would far exceed any possible benefits.

    • @boxcutter0
      @boxcutter0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tribalypredisposed he wasn’t talking about targeting each one with a rocket per say, it’s a question of vulnerability of satellite ecosystem to sabotage, debris dispersion system could be a cascading problem. Rockets that eject bb’s maybe.

    • @tribalypredisposed
      @tribalypredisposed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@boxcutter0 but any nation with the technology to attack satellites will also have their own satellites in the same orbits, right? So I don't see bb attacks working, and really blowing up the SpaceX satellites would have a similar effect of spreading dangerous debris all over.

    • @boxcutter0
      @boxcutter0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tribalypredisposed It would be reckless & a shame to have it done, but in times of war some countries might believe satellite communications give countries like the US, or China, or Russia advantages & dependencies that they aren’t as vulnerable to. North Korea would suffer less from satellite mayhem, but could lash out in such a way that doesn’t directly kill other people & escalate in traditional sense… just some possibilities to consider.

    • @boxcutter0
      @boxcutter0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tribalypredisposed plus we likely need to come to the realization that exponential growth in technology & openly accessible research… many threats will be easier for more people/nations to duplicate… nuclear proliferation esp with Ukraine fiasco, rockets, biological/chemical advances & capacity of small scale “basement” labs. Another reason better global cooperation is needed, and rogue mischievous countries can be so problematic…

  • @will2see
    @will2see 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeff who? Richard who?

  • @BBBrasil
    @BBBrasil 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who gets to define and enforce policy is the point, isn't it?
    In many countries we see unbundling policies, when the traditional telecom incumbent is forced to share its infrastructure.
    Bcs it was the first to deployed the copper wires, it would have an unfair advantage over newcomers.
    Who will unbundle orbits and asteroids and moon mines, for the benefit of humankind customers?

  • @williamlai29
    @williamlai29 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    DW News: Who is winning the new space race?
    Me: Wait, where is the end of the line?

  • @zegunugu3162
    @zegunugu3162 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Musk he does it with passion the others are just boring rich people ;)

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think Bezos is seriously interested in advancing space exploration too. He just hasn't had all that much success yet. Maybe Blue Origin will eventually get New Glenn into space. But by then SpaceX is probably flying Starship regularly.

  • @sbeyer17
    @sbeyer17 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    12:10 that's the reason why space telescopes are way more important than ground based telescope in the midterm future. Additionaly space telescopes are better than groundbased telescopes because they don't need to look through the atmosphere

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We need several on the surface of Moon too.

    • @sbeyer17
      @sbeyer17 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ajaykumarsingh702 yeah, the moon is somewhat ideal for telescopes but i think at some point the moon orbits are going to get crowded too.

    • @harvirdhindsa3244
      @harvirdhindsa3244 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      While that would be ideal, some telescope systems can only be ground-based at the moment, for both technical and economical reasons.

  • @xdmztryvsvedine2773
    @xdmztryvsvedine2773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish I could be alive when it’s normal for a human to drive out of their garage and straight into space to visit their friends/family on the moon (or to Mars in minutes.) Basically Star Wars, but just a bunch of chill Mandalorians.

  • @kieranbishop1481
    @kieranbishop1481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if we sent up a giant electro magnet to divert tiny fragments toward earth

  • @sizzla123
    @sizzla123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Send in the Clowns

  • @elliotsmith9812
    @elliotsmith9812 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is inevitable that earth based telescopes will loose effectivity with time. It is happening sooner then was expected, but it is inevitable. It is also inevitable that the moon will some day not look as it always has. At some point, fairly soon, it will have an atmosphere of dust that will make it eventually look like a grey blur. This is a good time to talk about it. It is a good time to maybe delay the inevitable. But delay is all we can do.

  • @jimsuber6784
    @jimsuber6784 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems to me that people are always concerned with sharing. Especially when they are behind the curve. Interesting.

  • @mbukukanyau
    @mbukukanyau 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the constitution apply in Space? Would you want to work for the world economic forum in Space? Would you own your DNA or even your labor in their lifeboat?

  • @samsonsoturian6013
    @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Screw anyone's sovereignty. The frontier is first come first serve. It doesn't matter if it's a government, corporation, or international agency.

  • @chrisstarcher6010
    @chrisstarcher6010 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's sad that Russia will no longer contribute to anything space anymore.

  • @MrSean03839
    @MrSean03839 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't look up.

  • @EnergiaII
    @EnergiaII 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It's disappointing to see everyone fighting over a future that should be the entire humanity's future as a collective, not as nations

    • @thanhleusacuocsongmy8168
      @thanhleusacuocsongmy8168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      go tell Russia and China and their allies that and see what they have to say.

    • @edwardkay3193
      @edwardkay3193 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thanhleusacuocsongmy8168 So it's ok if it's the Europeans?

    • @MrTaxiRob
      @MrTaxiRob 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Soyuz is the most successful launch system in history

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it is competition. And it is good to see. Competition gave the modern world basically everything. F.e. the electronic devices we watch this video on.

    • @Alexandra-zp3gr
      @Alexandra-zp3gr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Competition demands necessity and necessity is the mother of invention. This is good for the future of space innovation.

  • @marianasalles242
    @marianasalles242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Exploring the space…and why not investing in protecting our planet 🌏 ? Humanity is sick

  • @gameelders3611
    @gameelders3611 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    LMFAO literally the newest place super wealthy can hide & play.

  • @hondaparts3897
    @hondaparts3897 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ukraine is thankful for you Mr musk thank you

  • @edwardhalkett9609
    @edwardhalkett9609 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Elon Musk???

  • @Crashed131963
    @Crashed131963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There is still a race?
    We have not even been back to the moon in 50 years.
    More people on earth were not bore during the last moon landing than are alive to remember it.

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      One man is racing, the others pretend to participate.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@harmless6813 and you pretend to pay attention

    • @harmless6813
      @harmless6813 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samsonsoturian6013 Do you have a point to make? Then please do so.

    • @ihl0700677525
      @ihl0700677525 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The first race was little more than to show off whose ICBM could travel the furthest. A complete waste of taxpayers money.
      This second race is about commercialization and actual space colonization. Paid for by those billionaires.