Battle of the Greats: Joost vd Westhuizen vs Fourie du Preez

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 87

  • @ratters33
    @ratters33 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I played against Joost in matric ('89). It was a friendly match as his school was in a higher league - he scored 7 tries against us, on his own!! He was the best scrummie the rugby world has seen, so far.

    • @carldanelaubscher1489
      @carldanelaubscher1489 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      then came FAF

    • @ryanwaugh1
      @ryanwaugh1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Depends what you looking for in a scrumhalf. As an individual he was the best. If you looking for what a guy did to the team then FDP

    • @grethavanhuyssteen
      @grethavanhuyssteen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@carldanelaubscher1489 Faf is an embarrassment for both joost and du preez

    • @grethavanhuyssteen
      @grethavanhuyssteen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ryanwaugh1 agree, depends on the gameplan. Running gameplan: Joost. More conservative gameplan aka box kicks, set plays, etc. Du Preez hands down

    • @ryanwaugh1
      @ryanwaugh1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@grethavanhuyssteen what makes you feel Faf is so bad?

  • @AdamPerkinsPhD
    @AdamPerkinsPhD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    As an England fan I admired du Preez massively for his technical command of the all round 9 game, plus he seems to be a nicer bloke than van der Westhuizen. But if I had to choose between him or van der Westhuizen for my team it would be van der Westhuizen as we feared him more because he had that larger than life quality like Maradona, where he would puff out his chest and take a match by the scruff of the neck. Pure warrior genius.

    • @deelman3340
      @deelman3340 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well put. I feel exactly the same. Both geniuses, du Preez the more balanced general, Joost the more of an x factor

    • @Deontjie
      @Deontjie ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And somehow Dumb Blond Pienaar and our selectors choose to select Johan Roux over Joost for the 1995 world cup. Luckily for South Africa Roux got injured.

  • @grantlake980
    @grantlake980 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Joost was sheer class. Always looking for the try. Always looking to hurt them. Best scrum half I have ever seen.

  • @MrFijibati
    @MrFijibati 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    No competition or comparison required.. Joost was and still is the best #9.. heart of a Lion 💪

  • @vilzskilz2009
    @vilzskilz2009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Joost all day, love from NZ supporter

  • @Jarred811
    @Jarred811 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Fourie was exceptional but Joost was touched by greatness. Joost vs Gareth Edwards is the discussion the rugby world should be having.

    • @mtnstrand2819
      @mtnstrand2819 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Quite!!! The two best scrumhalves ever.

  • @mtnstrand2819
    @mtnstrand2819 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Joost's athletic ability made him the better of the two. Together with Gareth Edwards, they're probably the three best scrumhalves ever to play the game.

  • @meta4282
    @meta4282 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Joost had a pathological refusal to be dominated on the field.

    • @kevinryan766
      @kevinryan766 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's surprising to me, I don't know if this true, Joost was in FH Odendaal high school. Not exactly a big school

  • @gmac94
    @gmac94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Both greats! Joost because he was the only one to tackle Jonah Lomu when he hit the RWC scene. Back when no one could stop him, Joost was the one who manned up and tackled him. All 3 epic players, respect!

  • @shaunhawkins7588
    @shaunhawkins7588 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    50/50 really like fourie du preez looks like such a humble human being,but both were fine players and each deserve alot of credit rip J9

  • @boerieroll
    @boerieroll 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For me, Fourie was the more technical more traditional scrumhalf, Joost was an enigma, a law unto his own, exciting unpredictable and supremely talented. Both greats of the game but if I had to choose I would choose Joost

  • @itude1237
    @itude1237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Joost, Fourie & Faf... all 3 were exceptional key cogs with all of the Bok’s WC victories

  • @ryanwaugh1
    @ryanwaugh1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Joost was a better individual player but Fourie was a better team player. I’d take Fourie as his distribution was faster and cleaner, and reading of the game was better. Joost was better running and defending.

  • @roan-zainclaassens7569
    @roan-zainclaassens7569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the video was really nice to see two all time greats again.. But we can't really compare the two as Fourie only played in the professional Era and Joost played his best rugby in a latter part of the amateur Era.. Fourie was an absolute general his kicking ability and skill to read a game is till this day untouched.. Joost kept defences on their toes with his breaks around the rucks and honestly one of the best support players to ever touch a rugby ball.. I will forever be a Fourie du Preez supporter he changed the role and importance of a 9 on the pitch.. Personally I would like to like to see a video where Joost is compared to Justin Marshall they are a fair contest to judge..

  • @eddieyoshida9627
    @eddieyoshida9627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Joost, then Fourie 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦

  • @sqobamhlungujackson4786
    @sqobamhlungujackson4786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Huge fan of both. Think they had different skills. Joost was phenomenal with ball in hand and breaking from the loose scrums, but Fourie was the Generaal, directing the game and kicking on a penny (haven't seen any of his kicks in this video). SA and NTVL rugby was so blessed with both these players, best 9's of all time.
    Fourie also maybe had a slight advantage in the quality of players around him during most of his career, Matfield, Bakkies, Rossouw, van Heerden, Gary Botha, Hougaard, Morne Steyn, Habana, Ettienne Botha, the golden years.
    I think Joost's record in the green and gold was close to a try every 2nd match. Absolute machine.

  • @stephenstrydom1
    @stephenstrydom1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hard to image a rugby world without Joost

  • @gamewithwayne4831
    @gamewithwayne4831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Joost is just on another level, he’d be the best even if he was playing today

  • @henkstols9326
    @henkstols9326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Joost was to me a better player and had amazing defence, Fourie was more tactical and is our second best scrummie.

  • @NeilOosthuizen
    @NeilOosthuizen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking at these two and the scrum-half talent SA had in the 2019 World Cup is just nuts...

  • @Billcasiopost
    @Billcasiopost 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Joost had more skills and was a better player but Fourie was smarter and tactically superior. Both AWESOME!!

  • @johnkotze7720
    @johnkotze7720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Joost all day long. One of the best ever

  • @Enrique_00_
    @Enrique_00_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This makes me proud to be a Bulls Supporter

  • @Mr1in1000000
    @Mr1in1000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jooste a top 3 springbok for sure .

  • @alexandrosrapanos8483
    @alexandrosrapanos8483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They were both very different players. Both excellent but different. Fourie was an amazing team player and most of the time mad players look like Demi- gods, by an amazing kick or pass. Joost was an amazing individual player as he was fast and a decent size. Both are amazing, if picking a team you have to see which better fits/ which role you need filled. As I stated both amazing players, I think they cannot be properly compares head to head, as they are so different.

  • @mikegreen1613
    @mikegreen1613 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That era of both their careers was that of true character, they're both respectfully the best in their role and modest personalities. None of this 'show pony' finishing like we see nowadays. Dot the try and job done, back to half way and ready up. We spend 5 minutes watching players performing skits, throwing up gestures and all sorts of shit after scoring. I miss this footy culture, real hard grafting footy. Joost, I'll never forget how you chopped Jonah down in 95, you're a great man overall. God bless you both as you were 'David' and Jonah was your 'Goliath'. Both were great friends til the end. Arohanui bro.

  • @HenryDube72
    @HenryDube72 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Based on these highlights, Joost for sure.

    • @mariusprinsloo1622
      @mariusprinsloo1622 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This video showcase their tries, what was not shown was how Fourie du Preez's vision & excellent passing game led to many tries for his team mates.

  • @drukjohn1982
    @drukjohn1982 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Joost scored more tries and was more influential imo.

  • @tobolee6385
    @tobolee6385 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could fourie tackle lomu ..?!,,, joost miles ahead in skill and desire ,,,,

  • @abelpretorius7477
    @abelpretorius7477 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Joost individual brilliance

  • @ttvfatmangames
    @ttvfatmangames ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not really fair to Fourie if you show 100 tries of Joost and only 4 of Du Preez. However...both was world class and who will forget the game that Du Preez dominated for South Africa agains England in the 2007 World Cup that we won 33 - 0 (if I rememberd correctly) I loved them both and what their value was for for Springboks...

  • @ay613
    @ay613 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Joost wins this just.

  • @JenkiJ
    @JenkiJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don’t think anything could separate these two as far a legend status goes, however joost seemed to be a better individual player when it came to attacking play. Fourie however was always the central nervous system when it came to the bulls and boks and had such good knowledge on the game; given an inch of space he would create an opportunity. Both legends of the game. Hopefully Faf will make his mark in years to come as well.

  • @PatrickCuba8
    @PatrickCuba8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll never forget when Fourie came onto the field in that match against the Argies and suddenly the supply of front foot ball became so clean and crisp that we smashed the Argies by a record score. And what about that performance against England in the group stages of 2007 WC...

  • @lm_b5080
    @lm_b5080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now for an André Joubert vs. Percy video

  • @RealRugby
    @RealRugby 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video. Where did you get all the footage?

  • @sidneynoortman4161
    @sidneynoortman4161 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    du preez is one of the best no9 make no mistake about but he we have to remember that he learn from the best no9 in the world to ever put on the no9 jersey then joost and there never will be ano9 to better then joost.joost number one then du preez.no one will ever be as goed as them

  • @jamiebrown1235
    @jamiebrown1235 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Makes me wonder how Springbok rugby and especially Bulls management and coaching ruined Hougaardt. He was next in line.

    • @subashsewchuran1803
      @subashsewchuran1803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The main difference between the two is that Joost allowed the flyhalf to run the game and took control only if required whilst Fourie ran the game from 9, thus not requiring the flyhalf except for kicking hence the lack of development of most Bulls flyhaves in that Era. It was not Fourie's fault but the choice of the coaches.

    • @sqobamhlungujackson4786
      @sqobamhlungujackson4786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@subashsewchuran1803 Think he was referring to Francois Hougaardt, not Derrick.

    • @sqobamhlungujackson4786
      @sqobamhlungujackson4786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Personally I think Francois was much more effective on wing, if he just continued playing wing he would've been viewed as a world class wing in a short amount of time. He had less of an impact once he moved to scrummie.

    • @subashsewchuran1803
      @subashsewchuran1803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sqobamhlungujackson4786 I think the issue with Francois was that they expected him to be another Fourie and he couldn't live up to expectations which impacted on his natural development as a 9.

    • @subashsewchuran1803
      @subashsewchuran1803 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Frikkie Oosthuizen I agree, we are lucky to have watched these 2 legends in action. Pure genius.

  • @CantThinkofaCoolOne
    @CantThinkofaCoolOne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Joost, WOW!

  • @RRSmurf
    @RRSmurf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the rest of the back line is dangerous, Du Preez
    If it's not, then Joost.

  • @boxingroyalty4840
    @boxingroyalty4840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not even close........Joost best

  • @namaqualand2010
    @namaqualand2010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Joost van Der Westhuizen, no contest. Next question.

  • @georgedouglas3930
    @georgedouglas3930 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Joost #GOAT

  • @thespeaker6322
    @thespeaker6322 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Joost was the best rugby player of all times, even better than Jonah Lomu.

  • @worldallycat
    @worldallycat ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Joost

  • @TheOuboet
    @TheOuboet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Joost was one of the best scrumhalves ever. But FdP was one of the best rugby players ever. He changed rugby.

  • @halasialemohe7607
    @halasialemohe7607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    RIP Joost

  • @zanevanniekerk6652
    @zanevanniekerk6652 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both men are greats. Gregan and Marshall can also be mentioned.

  • @vincentskywalker6611
    @vincentskywalker6611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We all know joost wins

  • @mashudumudau4507
    @mashudumudau4507 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was young joost but i go with Furie du preez

  • @struesbob7493
    @struesbob7493 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fourie was best SA player since readmission

  • @t.bozmkw3562
    @t.bozmkw3562 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FDP is the greatest. I love Joost but General Dupreez is magic. Fourie is a better Scrumhalf. Joost is better alround player. Fourie has kicking game and a top pass necessary as a 9. Joost relied on his size and pace. He's not a scrumhalf. You can't teach kids to play like Joost. FDP is the quintessential scrummy.

  • @davidhalaholo839
    @davidhalaholo839 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fourie.. 🥐

  • @lii114
    @lii114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bulls rugby went backwards

  • @duvenhage00
    @duvenhage00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is this even a question? Fourie du Preez is a rugby genius and, bar Danie Craven, the greatest SA scrumhalf ever.

    • @JenkiJ
      @JenkiJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s no footage of Danie Craven so don’t know how you came to that conclusion

    • @duvenhage00
      @duvenhage00 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JenkiJ Really? No footage? At all?
      Ok then. I read widely.
      Happy now?

    • @JenkiJ
      @JenkiJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Andre Duvenhage helaas, danie craven was nie in my era van rugby nie, daarom kan ek nie oordeel oor hoe goed hy was nie. Ek kan net nie sien hoe u die hou van Fourie du Preez en Joost kan vergelyk met 'n skrumskakel wat nie eers in die professionele era gespeel het nie.

  • @brandenvandermerwe5352
    @brandenvandermerwe5352 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Altwee ysters in hulle eie manier!

  • @RabbitholeIsrael
    @RabbitholeIsrael 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they didn't call fourie du preez the general for no reason. He could read the game better than joost and are better tactical player than joost. Joost was better on individual basis.

  • @bytejourneycodes
    @bytejourneycodes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Joost