How 4 fundamental constants reveal minimum scales where physics ends: Planck scale

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/arvinash and get an exclusive offer for our viewers: an extended, month-long trial, FREE. MagellanTV has the largest and best collection of Science content anywhere, including Space, Physics, Technology, Nature, Mind and Body, and a growing collection of 4K. This new streaming service has 3000 great documentaries. Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/genres/sci...
    How the Planck scale is derived from the most important fundamental constants in physics. This is where our physics ends. If you wanted to simulate the universe in a computer, you would need to enter about 26 fundamental constants.
    15 of these are the rest masses of the fundamental particles of the standard model. 4 are the quark mixing parameters, required to describe the weak nuclear force. 4 are the neutrino mixing parameters. Cosmological constant describing the acceleration present in the universe’s expansion. fine structure constant which describes strength of the electromagnetic force, and the strong coupling constant - which defines the strength of the strong nuclear force.
    But 4 are special fundamental constants apply to everything everywhere. The gravitational constant G - It can be thought of as the proportionality factor between the strength of gravity and the masses creating that gravity. It has units of length cubed divided by mass times time squared.
    The speed of light, C is like a conversion factor between Mass and energy, or a conversion factor between the time dimension and the three spatial dimensions of our 4 dimensional universe.
    Planck’s constant is the fundamental constant that sets the minimum scale of quantum phenomenon. It can be found in just about any quantum mechanics equations. It has units of mass times distance squared divided by time.
    Boltzmann’s constant plays a role in determining the amount of vibrational energy contained in the atom related to temperature. It is just the definition of the energy contained in one degree Kelvin and has units of energy per degree.
    Using just 3 constants, G, c, and h we can get many Planck scale limits. If we manipulate them mathematically, we get a length. which is the Planck length. It is the minimum length that would be meaningful in quantum mechanics. :
    We also get time, which is the Planck time. It is the minimum time that can exist that would be meaningful in quantum physics.
    We also get energy by rearranging some of these constants. This is the Planck energy- the maximum energy that could be contained in a cube that had a size of one Planck length.
    We can convert this Planck energy into mass by using Einstein’s equation. This represents the maximum mass that a cube of one Planck length could have.
    Since these numbers are ubiquitous in physics, physicists often just use what’s called natural units, and set these constants equal to one.
    What is the significance of the Planck scale? The Planck length is the shortest length that means anything in the equations of quantum mechanics. This is not to say that something smaller doesn’t exist.
    It is the smallest scale that we can theoretically probe with particle accelerators. If string theory is true, then the strings would be as small as the Planck length, and would also be the smallest size of the loops in loops quantum gravity.
    Strings would vibrate at minimum time scales of the Planck time. The movement of the spin network in LQG would occur in increments of Planck time. Planck time is the time it takes for light to travel one Planck length.
    We have no idea what occurred prior to this time, nor do we have a model for what could have occurred.
    Using the word before may in fact be meaningless because time itself started at this point. This would be the true beginning of creation. What lies below the Planck scale? It could be a kind of quantum foam where gravity could fluctuate or be in superposition.
    Could space-time be in superposition like other quantum phenomenon? Perhaps, but this would violate some of the current understanding of gravity.
    Planck energy converted to Planck mass is really a lot of mass equivalent to energy in a tank of gasoline or petrol in your car.
    Some people have used the precision of the constants to argue for fine tuning, that any slight variation would have resulted in conditions which could not have created matter, or life as we know it.
    #planckscale
    #arvinash
    #wherephysicsends
    Others counter this argument by saying that, the universe isn’t all that fine tuned for life because by all accounts, almost all the volume of the universe supports no life. Life only occurs on a very limited volume of the universe, namely on very special planets that have just the right conditions.
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @jworldwide904
    @jworldwide904 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Speaking from 20 years of experience as a teacher, you, sir, are a magnificent one.

  • @leovalenzuela8368
    @leovalenzuela8368 3 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    I loved the “yes we won the cosmic lottery, but how many ticket did we have to buy?” closing line. Keep up the good work Arvin!

    • @jeminkukadiya5487
      @jeminkukadiya5487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Explain me please that cosmic lottery.

    • @spaceman081447
      @spaceman081447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jeminkukadiya5487
      RE: "Explain me please that cosmic lottery."
      (1) We live in a universe - part of the muliverse - whose physical constants allow time to flow and atoms to interact.
      (2) We live in a galactic cluster that is apparently free of antimatter.
      (3) We live in a galaxy that has an abundance of interstellar gas from which stars are formed. Also we live in a galaxy that has an abundance of supernovas, in which elements heavier than iron are formed.
      (4) We live in a solar system that has a central star that is a G2V type star. This means, amoung other things, that our star does not put out too much high-energy radiation and that it stays stable long enough for life to have evolved on at least one of its planets.
      (5) We live on a planet that was gifted with water from comets during the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB) about 4 billion years ago. We live on a planet whose average surface temperature cycles around that required for liquid water to exist.
      (NOTE: There are many other parameters, as well; these are just enough to get you started.)

    • @batmanVsJok3r
      @batmanVsJok3r 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spaceman081447 From what I know, a human live (our species), did not originate on this planet Earth. There has been live naturally developing on this planet in the course of evolution, however "we as humans" aren't entirely from here.
      Weird? Take a look at today's reality and compare it with Sci-fi from 20-30 years.
      Of course I cannot provide the source of my information, by any means. Just kidding 🤡 Search what Billy Meier have said about human origin and the history of humankind.

    • @bwfvc7770
      @bwfvc7770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1/137

    • @Sharperthanu1
      @Sharperthanu1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We live in the Twilight Zone.Face it.

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    “That’s coming up right now!”. I adore the way you say that with infectious enthusiasm.👌

    • @Jan-eh7nf
      @Jan-eh7nf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And straight after some adverts came...

  • @AADJYT
    @AADJYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +464

    wanted to learn about fundamental constants, ended up with existential dread. still great vid!

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +136

      Welcome to my world!

    • @christianheichel
      @christianheichel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Don't worry about the basilisk check out Kyle Hill's vid on that

    • @srajanverma9064
      @srajanverma9064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ArvinAsh wow!! What a comment 🤣😅😅😁

    • @chop-daresistance7514
      @chop-daresistance7514 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ArvinAsh LMAO 😂.. epic response

    • @bkenglandUTube
      @bkenglandUTube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As long as I tell myself "I'll get at least one part of this", I can keep going. Questions about what's beyond "the edge" are the most intriguing, that's for sure; any attempts to understand these details are worth the trip. Thanks, once again, @Arvin Ash, for helping us along!

  • @faisalsheikh7846
    @faisalsheikh7846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Incredible sir love ❤ from India 🇮🇳

  • @matthewbrennan3127
    @matthewbrennan3127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    This is too important to make everyone wait!

  • @infinityverse598
    @infinityverse598 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This man is a gem. I didn't score well in my Physics exam and I was sad. After watching this I'm better now. I want teacher like you in my college. They always talk about lagging behind in syllabus but actually don't care in explaining the topic intuitively.Thank you very much.

    • @franceleeparis37
      @franceleeparis37 ปีที่แล้ว

      Science and maths is there to try and explain what exists but not why… if you want to understand why we exist… look to the Torah/Bible/ Koran …. 😏

  • @craigwall9536
    @craigwall9536 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I really like the moving graphics where the math manipulations are carried out. Those are elegant and useful. It's nice seeing the units sliding around so you can pause and copy them down and not have to keep checking yourself when you do it on your own.

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Craig Wall
      Your use of the word "elegant" is absolutely perfect! Good job, Craig!! Keep on keeping on!!!

  • @hamzavictor2385
    @hamzavictor2385 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Awesome. Now I know why Max Planck is regarded as the father of quantum physics/mechanics. The foundation he created in physics has done a tonne of good for humanity.
    I love your videos, absolutely eductive

  • @ingenuity23
    @ingenuity23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +208

    "how many simulations did our overlords create?"
    The people who made the simulation, silently observing: *yes*

    • @orparga140
      @orparga140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Rumor has it that GTA6 will be released by 2023

    • @cosmicparticles9658
      @cosmicparticles9658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We were hoping Arvin will figure out how to make the next one.

    • @svampebob007
      @svampebob007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      that one guy who saves and reload constantly in games.
      my money is on simulation theory.

    • @TedWade73
      @TedWade73 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      2020 of s what happens when the simulation gets aware of simulation theory, crank up the weird until they stop worrying about being a simulation

    • @blake9541
      @blake9541 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      my brain just walked off the Planck

  • @richardly1543
    @richardly1543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    The coolest old guy on TH-cam

    • @MrAsystole
      @MrAsystole 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Not that old , chill

    • @KazimirQ7G
      @KazimirQ7G 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I hope he's at least 309 kelvin.

    • @IndigoGollum
      @IndigoGollum 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KazimirQ7G I don't see why he wouldn't be.

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Richard Ly
      From my perspective, he's a young man.......it's all relative, my friend.

  • @MLB9000
    @MLB9000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    There very well may be universes where life is not possible, but they don't have anybody there to ask why.

    • @user-ib1dx4dh3n
      @user-ib1dx4dh3n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There's no universe like that since life is concuisness and the universe needs concuisness, quantum mechanics proves that

    • @stevesalt8003
      @stevesalt8003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      The reason we find ourselves in such a fine tuned universe is because we're here to measure it. Richard Feynman.

    • @nileshkulkarni6196
      @nileshkulkarni6196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@user-ib1dx4dh3n its not like that
      There are various interpretations of q. Mechanics , most having no need of consciousness
      Pls. Try to understand what those are before commenting as ‘quantum mechanics proves it ‘ as at many places q. Mechanics is presented as being something mystical
      Quantum mechanics is actually fairly intuitive if we understand it
      They are sets of rules , and have little to no or nothing to do with consciousness

    • @nileshkulkarni6196
      @nileshkulkarni6196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Luke that is known as anthropic principle

    • @macronencer
      @macronencer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If this is not the only universe, then my intuition is that a finite number of universes is implausible, so there must be infinitely many. I also think this makes a lot more sense anyway, because it's simpler. Such metaphysical hypotheses can't be falsified, as Arvin pointed out, but I often suspect that everything is actually just made out of pure mathematics (and it only seems like reality to us because we're embedded in the maths)... this would suggest that every possible universe exists. Whatever that means :)

  • @MagruderSpoots
    @MagruderSpoots 3 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I, for one, would like to thank our ant overlords for choosing these constants.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Sure, could've been worse.

    • @greytroll1632
      @greytroll1632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ArvinAsh Yes, we could be living in that Rick and Morty alternate universe where peoples' faces and bottoms are swapped.

    • @slohmann1572
      @slohmann1572 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well, some think there is only one overlord and he’s called God. And they go to church to thank him. If you think about it, it’s the same thing.

    • @EcoAku
      @EcoAku 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@slohmann1572 Of course it is the same thing. That's one of the seductive aspects of the simulation hypothesis: the ability to reconcile, at a fundamental level, religions and science - OK, _nerdy_ science so far ^^

    • @greytroll1632
      @greytroll1632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EcoAku But then the programmer is not God. Who created the programmer's universe? Is it also a simulation? Then who created the one reality that is not a simulation?

  • @asmeetp
    @asmeetp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    What an amazing video! So straight forward and easy to follow. I wish I had these resources when I was back in school 20 years ago. You are an amazing teacher Arvin. Keep 'em coming! 👊

    • @darrellcooper3924
      @darrellcooper3924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah

    • @darrellcooper3924
      @darrellcooper3924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Assòuf ❤

    • @darrellcooper3924
      @darrellcooper3924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hey 🎉😮😂I'm going for the next big thing today so I will be here waiting for a holographic reunion to come in and we will have a fabulous birthday party

    • @darrellcooper3924
      @darrellcooper3924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But hey u can call me any

    • @darrellcooper3924
      @darrellcooper3924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ❤ ì þhink the best guitars in the known galaxy are a great awakening of my mind and my brother from another time

  • @christouffe
    @christouffe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +745

    Max Planck is an oxymoron

    • @MM6_Bruh
      @MM6_Bruh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      noice :) i guess i need to add dat in my english exam

    • @Yuhugg
      @Yuhugg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      😂

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +110

      Haha. Good one!

    • @geraldford6409
      @geraldford6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      His kids are named Min and Median

    • @medexamtoolsdotcom
      @medexamtoolsdotcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Not always. The planck mass is not the minimum mass and the planck energy is not the minimum energy, it's like 3 gigajoules. And if you're talking about the Planck Temperature, then Max Planck is just redundant.

  • @viknumbers701
    @viknumbers701 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Of all the many physics presentations I have seen this is the most understandable. It is the best!

  • @hanifburhanudin5878
    @hanifburhanudin5878 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    For everyone who involved making all this videos, you are making great content.👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @daveanderson718
    @daveanderson718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Mr. Ash, Very Impressive video. Packed so much information in just 13 mins. Hands down, one of the best videos I have seen all year. Thank you!

    • @AMorgan57
      @AMorgan57 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The universe is is the same number of billion of years old as this video is minutes long. Hmm.

    • @daveanderson718
      @daveanderson718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AMorgan57 Its the Illuminati!!

  • @BrightChocolate
    @BrightChocolate ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am not a physicist by no means but this is the most well rounded video I have seen on the question of quantum gravity. I think we do not fully understand the world we live in with two major theories in physics conflicting each other. Think we truly did win the cosmic lottery.

  • @redmeat4vegans62
    @redmeat4vegans62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Me listening to Arvin Ash: Like me reading Scientific American as a freshman in high school. Now, a masters in EE and lots of study of science later, I can understand most of the articles in Scientific American. Back in high school, I was very interested but 90% of the article was beyond me.
    So - thank you for giving me something to tackle. There were lots of details here I do not understand, but that just means there are many things to learn/investigate. I love your videos.

    • @OscarRuiz-gj3mp
      @OscarRuiz-gj3mp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You read SciAm in High School? A kindred spirit! I did back in the 70s....

    • @redmeat4vegans62
      @redmeat4vegans62 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OscarRuiz-gj3mp Kept at until I understood most or all the articles. Yes. I am a science nerd - and proud of it. Good for you!

  • @DavidTJames-yq9dr
    @DavidTJames-yq9dr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Blows my mind. Also blows my mind that I understand. Thanks Arvin Ash!

    • @robertc6343
      @robertc6343 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahaha yes, your post is an excellent description of Arvin’s channel😜 he’s a treasure.

  • @LQhristian
    @LQhristian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Epic times for visualizing and explaining complex subject matter!! Another great video Arvin and crew!

  • @Graeme_Lastname
    @Graeme_Lastname 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are both clear and concise, which is greatly appreciated. :)

  • @paulholditch3402
    @paulholditch3402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As always, another great presentation! Thank you, Sir!

  • @sam_bit7148
    @sam_bit7148 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    It felt so satisfying when epsilon(naught) and mu(naught) determine the speed of light. It gives a vibe that everything is connected.

    • @mrsamot4677
      @mrsamot4677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He has an entire video that goes over that relationship you should check it out

    • @Soken50
      @Soken50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "naught", as in zero, not "not"

  • @charliefrancis6438
    @charliefrancis6438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This channel is great for someone that doesn’t have a Phd in physics, you make easy to understand, I think anyway

  • @dr.jamesolack8504
    @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally, a TH-cam video about EVERY THING! Well done, Arvin....and everyone involved !!

  • @aliabbaszoher5618
    @aliabbaszoher5618 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Everyone must watch every single video on this channel. It's full of knowledge and all that explained so well. As I said before on another video of yours, great script and and amazing line to end this one

  • @briancrane7634
    @briancrane7634 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Splendid explanation! I joined!

  • @mylifemyrule4580
    @mylifemyrule4580 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Arvin speaks like an overall philosopher of science and that makes his videos all the more interesting

  • @bobbychakry
    @bobbychakry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love your content. You make science sound interesting and simple.

  • @aryanjadav7074
    @aryanjadav7074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    always best & good information . 😄👌👌👌👍👍👍

  • @Hal_T
    @Hal_T 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    In the library of extraordinary videos you have created, this is one of the best. I'm not smart enough to understand all the math. But I can understand your synthesis of this complex topic. I have been fascinated by the concept of Planck Length and Planck Time for quite awhile, but until this video I was wandering in the woods trying to find the path. Thank you for this amazing description of the fundamentals of our universe.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you. I appreciate that! Glad it was helpful.

    • @sadderwhiskeymann
      @sadderwhiskeymann 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mr.Arvin i have a weird question:. you seem to understand math pretty well. I, on the other hand find them too difficult but i can see the beauty in them. My question is:
      If i had to choose one equation to tattoo which would you suggest? I believe, after tattooing myself with it i would *have to* study it and understand it. So, which is THE most important one do you think?

    • @jacobladder5556
      @jacobladder5556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would say the time-dependent Schrodinger equation
      vergil.chemistry.gatech.edu/notes/quantrev/node9.html

    • @sadderwhiskeymann
      @sadderwhiskeymann 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacobladder5556 man, this is what i had in mind when asking!!!!
      I hope mrArvin sees this and offers bis opinion.

    • @jacobladder5556
      @jacobladder5556 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sadderwhiskeymann Make that the time-dependent Schrodinger equation
      vergil.chemistry.gatech.edu/notes/quantrev/node9.html

  • @alvaromartinbrito3561
    @alvaromartinbrito3561 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video, as usual! Much love from Canary Islands

  • @JB-et7cd
    @JB-et7cd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoy your videos. Thank you for taking the time to make them!

  • @Mckeycee
    @Mckeycee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic video! These are always getting better!

  • @MistaKittyKat
    @MistaKittyKat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for yet another excellent video Arvin.
    Your calm demeaner and your expertise on the subject-matter blend so well and is always so conducive to such an enjoyable learning experience. I look forward to many more videos from you.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for the kind words. My pleasure!

  • @Gigatless
    @Gigatless 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This guy is the final boss of explaining physics. He will explain things that all the other teachers fail to explain.

  • @Gamer-xb1eo
    @Gamer-xb1eo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this channel. You present it in a way where even a mere physics enthusiast like me can understand it easily. This channel deserves millions of subscribers.

  • @impromptu24
    @impromptu24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was an amazing video!!! I always wondered what made a fundamental constant, well, fundamental and you explained it clearly! I've watched this video 4x already. Mind 🤯

  • @ryang518
    @ryang518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It always seems like the answer is just out of reach, limited by the way we try and make sense of things

  • @gappythegoat5397
    @gappythegoat5397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Arvin can you do a video on quantum electrodynamics?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The prior video was on the subject. Just check out last week's video: th-cam.com/video/PutOOpAkjQ4/w-d-xo.html

    • @omargaber3122
      @omargaber3122 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh I want to see why quantum mechanics is incompatible with general relativity, using mathematical equations

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@omargaber3122 See my recent video on quantum gravity where I answer that question.

  • @stevesalt8003
    @stevesalt8003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The delivery of this content is second to none. Best channel on TH-cam.

  • @naturemc2
    @naturemc2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow! Arvin. I think this is your best video in TH-cam!! Amazing!

  • @crazyeyedme4685
    @crazyeyedme4685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    By the time we come up with a true TOE, it'll probably be when we've found a way to transcend the universe itself lol.

    • @JamesStevens1
      @JamesStevens1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I agree. I think we must form sensors to experience first hand the outer dimensions. Our 5 physical senses + our sense of time is keeping us from knowing more.

  • @dscottboris5132
    @dscottboris5132 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sounds like late night pub conversations, sure miss that part of life.

  • @macronencer
    @macronencer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Video was under 14 minutes but I think it took me 30 minutes to watch, because I kept having to pause it to think about the questions it prompted. Wow, this was a good one. Regarding the argument that our universe isn't necessarily well tuned for life (only in places)... it strikes me that there might be a distribution of suitability for life among the various universes, and if that were the case then ours would most likely be one of the more typical ones. I can sort of imagine there being *some* universes out there that are near the end of the curve, and are hospitable to life through most of their internal space. But I can't imagine what they would look like. Now THERE'S a challenge for an author...

  • @felixbaum48
    @felixbaum48 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Arvin Ash, I think I love you. This video concludes with absolute brilliance and good humor!

  • @abhaylath5601
    @abhaylath5601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I really liked the part where he explained how gravity is the weakest force

    • @johnny_eth
      @johnny_eth 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could we say the snowflake of forces?

  • @shethtejas104
    @shethtejas104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If 'the simulator' exists, he must be thanking you for explaining his work to the uninitiated beings like myself.

    • @shethtejas104
      @shethtejas104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      As for me, there is nobody up there. The problem with humans is we are contained by and contained within our sensory perception which is bound; The Universe is not obligated to follow any bound.

    • @shethtejas104
      @shethtejas104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But that doesn't mean we go about dropping our moral compass and just run a steam roller over the society. Morality exists independent of science.

  • @saltycreole2673
    @saltycreole2673 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very cool Arvin. Always fun and understandable.

  • @floak18
    @floak18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great eye opening, mind bending video as always 🖤

  • @itwasntidio4623
    @itwasntidio4623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Came to learn physics and ended up with an existential crisis

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Haha. That's exactly what someone else said. My response was, "Welcome to my world!"

    • @tauceti8341
      @tauceti8341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Become an engineer so you can just approximate the constants :-P
      Problem solved!

    • @itwasntidio4623
      @itwasntidio4623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tauceti8341 This is big brain time

    • @itwasntidio4623
      @itwasntidio4623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArvinAsh Your world is mysterious and scary

  • @surajtiwari2614
    @surajtiwari2614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow! You described the quantum mechanics limit. Btw, i liked the flipping of equations to derive plack length, planck time etc.

  • @Eclipsed_Archon
    @Eclipsed_Archon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    and I'm subscribed!
    SO many people, even experts in the field, misinterpret Planck length and time as being the shortest/smallest thing that can carry information and believe units smaller simply cannot exist, all because it's fundamental. But here it's described properly, possibly a first for the TH-cam platform! Thank you so much this!

  • @rodolfojoseespino6729
    @rodolfojoseespino6729 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My congratulations for your capacity to explain and for your humility... Eternity bless all!👍🇦🇷

  • @aryangill908
    @aryangill908 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hi Arvin, if the multiverse is real and each Universe has a different set of fundamental constants, wouldn't some of them just seize to exist or result in pure energy, for example, if electromagnetism is stronger than the strong nuclear force protons in the nucleus would repel and atoms couldn't exist? If the speed of light is different, does that not mean that each universe would have a different relativistic speed limit, so effects like time dilation and length contraction happen at different speeds?
    Thanks for a great video as usual.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, this appears to be the case. However, I will add this caveat: the speed of light appears to be a fundamental constant, i.e., it has no theoretical basis. We may, however, discover that there is fundamental reason it must be the speed that it is, in which case, it is possible that other universes may be subject to the same fundamental cause.

    • @arawalshukla5413
      @arawalshukla5413 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh Thanks @Arvin Ash for this reply

  • @zerk317
    @zerk317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Fascinating video. 🤙🏼
    Is there a team behind this channel? Or is Arvin Ash just one dude?

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Definitely a team.

    • @intuitive_soul
      @intuitive_soul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ArvinAsh would it be inappropriate to ask where the team’s funding comes from? Just curious if it’s like a school, grant, company or just the TH-cam revenue?

  • @BernardWei
    @BernardWei 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another brilliant video, thanks for sharing.

  • @ASHOKKUMAR-bu4ey
    @ASHOKKUMAR-bu4ey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Arvin Ash coming!! right now!!
    Thanks for the information

  • @dixshants1227
    @dixshants1227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I loved your video. I can only support by posting a positive comment ❤️

  • @SachinKumar-de8nd
    @SachinKumar-de8nd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    If gravity is not a force according to Einstein then why we are searching for graviton and quantum gravity
    ... Can it not end with the explanation that space-time curve at very small level is negligible ??????
    Please .,please please please
    Arvin ash answer me

    • @gautamgupta7860
      @gautamgupta7860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes I am also thinking about that

    • @denton151
      @denton151 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because this doesn't fulfill the explanation of how we get curvature of spacetime. We are trying to refine a measurement technique really. And to do that we have to be specific. If we see infinitly small processes then maybe we could make these grandiose complex processes happen like "matter traveling at the speed of light". Our goal is to be the masters of this simulation/universe. And if there is a question we can not answer one could never truly become the master, now could they?

    • @felicityc
      @felicityc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      why would it end like that

    • @ozzymandius666
      @ozzymandius666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1. Gravity is a force, its just that its mechanism is not yet explainable in terms of QM.
      2. Something happens at Plank energies, something happens at the center of a black hole. To describe that something, we will need to, at the very least, be able to explain gravity in terms of QM.

    • @TheOnlineBlackboard
      @TheOnlineBlackboard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well because we have managed to describe the other forces in this way using mediator bosons. So it's a natural choice, but it might be wrong. The issue is that the world is quantum, so it may be necessary to find a quantum gravity theory to get the full understanding of the force.
      It could indeed be that there is no quantum theory for gravity, but that the concept of GR is correct. This is also the result in the theory of everything Quantum Holonomy Theory, which is really cool.

  • @redpower6956
    @redpower6956 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video as usual!

  • @KLiNoTweet
    @KLiNoTweet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just wow. I love your videos!!

  • @rajibsarmah6744
    @rajibsarmah6744 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What quantum fields are made of - stringy membrane or worldsheet of string theory

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is no substance. They are just properties in space-time.

    • @geraldford6409
      @geraldford6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Almighty FSM sayeth all spacetime composed of stringy Ramen

    • @gsalien2292
      @gsalien2292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArvinAsh " Only realize the truth.....There is no spoon "

  • @ShawnPitman
    @ShawnPitman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0:15 Star Wars aurebesh language.
    Nice Easter egg.

    • @marcus8710
      @marcus8710 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought i caught that but then thought "no way..."

  • @LordandGodofYouTube
    @LordandGodofYouTube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video Arvin!

  • @bmozafari7
    @bmozafari7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So good awesome vid!

  • @flopyrelly4281
    @flopyrelly4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Nonono!
    It was just wayyyy too short!

    • @medexamtoolsdotcom
      @medexamtoolsdotcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The chain of o's in your spelling of the word too is also too short.

    • @flopyrelly4281
      @flopyrelly4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@medexamtoolsdotcom does it really matter? I mean it's youtube, not a school test or something.

    • @flopyrelly4281
      @flopyrelly4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@medexamtoolsdotcom there, happy now?

    • @dr.jamesolack8504
      @dr.jamesolack8504 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      LWAL Gaming
      Take a Valium......it was a mere comment.

    • @flopyrelly4281
      @flopyrelly4281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dr.jamesolack8504oh really? You came a little too late...

  • @Sasoon2006
    @Sasoon2006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Overlords: "You wouldn't believe what did we need to get through to get this simulation from staging to production!"

  • @willtothewong
    @willtothewong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video as always!

  • @rodnyc.8876
    @rodnyc.8876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best video so far. Keep up the great work on the channel

  • @gautamgupta7860
    @gautamgupta7860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I will get a heart ❤️❤️
    Because
    I believe

    • @Dot_UwU
      @Dot_UwU 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hmmmmmm :thinking:

    • @medexamtoolsdotcom
      @medexamtoolsdotcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No hearts for you for that religious logic!

    • @gabor6259
      @gabor6259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A heart has to be earned.

    • @gautamgupta7860
      @gautamgupta7860 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@medexamtoolsdotcom I didn't believe in any religion

  • @Jay-ln1co
    @Jay-ln1co 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When physicists do planking.

  • @g3452sgp
    @g3452sgp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fundamental constants!!
    Beautiful!
    This is the great video.

  • @anilkumarpadwal9752
    @anilkumarpadwal9752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very well explained , thanks for clarifying how fundamental constants shape Universe as we know today

  • @Bassotronics
    @Bassotronics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    If the singularity was “infinite”, then the schwarzschild radius would be big enough to devour the whole universe.

    • @ArvinAsh
      @ArvinAsh  3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      It has infinite density, not infinite mass. Infinitely small point.

    • @Bassotronics
      @Bassotronics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *Arvin Ash*
      Thanks for the reply!
      I always find it interesting that if space itself is infinitely huge then that means we are infinitely small. Or at least until we reach the Planck length.😁

    • @upgrade1583
      @upgrade1583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thats why there's a planck limit

    • @nunomaroco583
      @nunomaroco583 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Mr. Arvin, its possible individual particles have a halo of darkmatter, like in galaxys, or in the void between nucleos of an atom and the electrons? All the best

    • @Bgrosz1
      @Bgrosz1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ArvinAsh ,
      First of all, another awesome video. Excellent brain candy.
      I've seen many of these types of videos say that when the math says something is infinite, the actual translation is "we don't know". We just don't have a model to explain whatever calculates to infinite (e.g. the center of a black hole). I'm curious if you have a position on that. Do you believe something can be infinitely small or infinitely dense?

  • @stevetobias4890
    @stevetobias4890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really appreciate scientists that are not arrogant enough to discount the possibility of a divine creator.

    • @Ntnt11
      @Ntnt11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No scientist would say there is no possibility for divine creator. Most scientists would say that there is no divine creator that few of us claim to know about.

    • @alaroyde5758
      @alaroyde5758 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      All regious people deny logic that proof the unlikely ness of god existence but science has open minds they mostly asept the logic that its a possibility

    • @geraldford6409
      @geraldford6409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As Server Admin for this particular Universe Simulation, I can attest that the Sim developer is living a life of luxury and wealth in the Metaverse

    • @biswajitsahoo9368
      @biswajitsahoo9368 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even if there is a greater he is not God

  • @23Eladdo
    @23Eladdo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exceptionally good one.
    Thanks!!

  • @faiza7740
    @faiza7740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dear Arvin Ash this is the best channel on physics you not only explain the physics but also explain math behind it with exact formulas

  • @medexamtoolsdotcom
    @medexamtoolsdotcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Remember that the more energy you put into a photon, the smaller its wavelength gets, while the more energy you put into a black hole, the larger it gets. The planck energy is just the energy where they cross each other, where that amount of energy results in a photon that's the same size as the black hole with that energy. And that size is, of course, the planck length.

    • @danielash1704
      @danielash1704 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A black hole ejections of ionized plasma at all most the speed of light shows there is a limit of how much energy that is important to knowing the internal size of its limits 5 years and 70 doys before it plays out and others where even longer depending on the timeline and sizes are a factor.

  • @TheMuffinMan
    @TheMuffinMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why have I learned every constant at school but never been taught that the plancks length is derived from other 3...

    • @aashirwadmishra3706
      @aashirwadmishra3706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its not derived, it was measured

    • @TheMuffinMan
      @TheMuffinMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aashirwadmishra3706 Nope, it was derived. We cant measure anything that small. Plus he literally showed how it's derived lol

    • @aashirwadmishra3706
      @aashirwadmishra3706 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheMuffinMan Ohh can you add the timestamps? Cause as far as I remember, he only showed us the equation E = hv in the video

    • @aashirwadmishra3706
      @aashirwadmishra3706 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mattmurphy7030 Thats exactly what I meant. Good job

    • @TheMuffinMan
      @TheMuffinMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aashirwadmishra3706 haha I didnt even realize I said plancks constant. I meant planck length

  • @prof.bharatkangude
    @prof.bharatkangude 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting and thought provoking. Thanks Arvin Sir.

  • @journeytotheinfinity440
    @journeytotheinfinity440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome.... Speechless

  • @walterlyzohub8112
    @walterlyzohub8112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’m trying to make a good joke here.
    The ground base for physics is a Planck floor.
    I hope there is no need to explain this.

  • @felicityc
    @felicityc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another reminder that everyone in the comments making an assertion is in the leftmost part of the Dunning-Kruger effect, including myself and you

    • @wizard7314
      @wizard7314 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish that meme would die.

  • @sebastiannieves5472
    @sebastiannieves5472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video!!!

  • @mikethunman436
    @mikethunman436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting vid...! Enjoyed it

  • @LowellBoggs
    @LowellBoggs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video - informative. Intriguing, beautiful to look at. Thanks

  • @artb4700
    @artb4700 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent vid. Loved the 'cosmic lottery' humour that you ended with.

  • @christianlibertarian5488
    @christianlibertarian5488 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really, really enjoy these videos.

  • @swamiaman7708
    @swamiaman7708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much Sir. I am feeling lucky to watch it first ,,,,,.....

  • @bgebbq314
    @bgebbq314 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outstanding production and content!

  • @michaelrudert3406
    @michaelrudert3406 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really good explained in this short time and the best summarizing about what is all about happens to those lengths and their deriving from- great!

  • @wewho1279
    @wewho1279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos are usually really good. This one was awesome.

  • @hans-jurgenkallweit2767
    @hans-jurgenkallweit2767 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you, glad to See your explanations

  • @UlaisisP
    @UlaisisP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Siempre geniales tus episodios, amigo.

  • @reueljacques
    @reueljacques 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love you Mr Arvin!!!

  • @bad_keyzi
    @bad_keyzi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that was one badass masterclas!

  • @davidwilson2266
    @davidwilson2266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    well articulated.