Civil War reviews are out and while I’d not seen it at the time of recording, I have now. And the critics reviews seemed wild and unhinged before the movie, and now their Civil War takes are even worse. What do you think of what you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for watching :)
It was a pretty mid movie. It was a movie about "war photographers' experiences", above anything else. The civil war aspect of the plot wasn't even that strong.
@@FobiddenMexican At least some of the reviewers were aware enough to realize that the film wasn't trying to favour one side over the other. But they still had voice their displeasure about it.
Except it did, considering the president in the movie is modeled after Trump and they end him in the climax. The critics can't be bothered to admit that part though.
@@Greshgore Ended him by a 🍫 person or the mere mentioning by the actress in the movie that talks about the unfortunate end for the Aunt Tifa group. Critics definitely won't ever admit that.
@@Ghost101 oh yes " I was on the ground at the antifa massacre" and one of the more psycho reporters acting like the helicopter door gunner in Full Metal Jacket, wanting to run toward a firefight because "I have such a H-O (engorged male, good lord navigating TH-cam's censorship in order to not get my comment hidden is a pain in the rear) for this @#$%!"
@Greshgore What I like about it is the WF talk about the 3rd term, and dismantling of FBI and airstrikes on civilians *yet* every combat action by them is a WF war crime. They murk wounded enemy combatants, the Press Secretary, the Secret Service, civil servants, summarily execute 3 uniformed surrendered enemy combatants... and pose for a DEI deer trophy picture with POTUS after he begs for his life. It's like the US version of "Come and See".
It was done on purpose so that the freaks Dispy was covering could not claim this is inciting an **actual** insurrection. Cali would have to survive an apocalypse to grow up enough to team with Texas.
@@thetruth45678Journalists generally don't understand people because they are sociopaths and narcissists. To some degree I think narcissism actually fuels interest in journalism, especially any kind of "I'm making the world a better place with my work!" mentalities. The good ones are the obsessive dudes that are willing to torch their own careers and reputation in search of the truth.
TH-cam critics: "The bad guy is too obviously a bad caricature of Trump. I don't like it." Media critics: "They aren't obvious enough about saying the bad guy is Trump. I don't like it."
Reddit critics: "I was hoping for an hour and a half of everyone shooting a giant Trump with rocket launchers." 4Chan critics: "I was hoping for 'The Turner Diaries: The Motion Picture.'"
The hilarity of the idea that Texas would be apart of the side fighting against Trump too 😂😂😂 We all know if there was a civil war, the libs would be annihilated lol it wouldn't even be much of a war
School stopped championing teaching critical rational thought. Civilization built on common sense and critical thinking collapses. Who'd a thought? (Answer: Anyone who'd learned critical thought)
@@Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0000 I know people who legitimately think that women need to be in combat role because it's good for their self-esteem. Most Americans have NO idea what war is.
@@2012sonora won't be so good for their self esteem when they experience the horrors that always happen to women in warzones since the beginning of time. It's never good..
@@Demiurge13 You mean, they deliberately don't get killed and get captured instead? Sounds like that's just going to inflate their self-esteem more than ever.
Honestly, during that big pause after you said “you can imagine they were incredibly unhappy…” I was just muttering, “that’s a fair bet, when are they ever not?”
While I can agree with much of what Disparu says about the critic's reactions, I don't think they are disappointed that the film does not clearly tell them who to hate, but rather disappointed that it does not clearly tell "the audience" they want to tell who to hate, who to hate.
Here’s a “onesideism”: One side doesn’t have a clue about how an actual current Civil War would pan out and one side is pretty calm because they know exactly how it would pan out.
Unless the side that knows how it would plan out knows it would be a thoroughly sacked country which would end with some sort of authoritarian regime no one knows how it would playout. That isn't even getting into people not appreciating how none of us are self sufficient. Yes the cities might be the worst out of us but even people living on farms aren't self efficient compared to what they once were.
Not only were many of the critics oblivious to the implications in the movie, they're also totally oblivious to the fact a civil war in our reality would have nothing to do with race. In the lands of Hollywood and DC, Ignorance is king.
@@CharlesUrban when the media puts things out there in the movies/tv shows/ and or music that come true to one degree or another... when its as heavy handed as this narrative has been since 2016/17, and really even before that, they generally happen..
The greatest reaction to this film was NOT that a civil war was POSSIBLE in current day America, but that there is no way Texas and California would team up!
Its cause people saying that are ignorant of the history of their own country and states. California and Texas very much would team up assuming certain factors were in play.
@@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent And Hawaii being bought my France is possible. Under the right circumstances. The director states that the whole California and Texas was solely done. To tell people directly this is a fantasy setting. In an interview.
“Everything needing to be spelled out for them” is pretty much how Netflix rewrote Avatar the Last Airbender. Some of them sound like the audience that liked the Netflix version cuz they like being slapped in the face with too much meaningless exposition from the rewritten characters and backstories. 🤦♀️ It’s also still strange how some people confuse reality with fiction.
"it's also still strange how some people confuse reality with fiction." Well, many of these guys did spend most of the last 8 years calling DJT "he who must not be named" and calling themselves "the resistance"...
The influence of war on various parts of society. The war itself is just set dressing and the "main characters" are just a vehicle to show us various consequences to various groups in the country.
"What do you think about Civil War?" Neccessary. I'm sick of living with the left and don't want them to have any kind of vote in how I have to live my life. Wait, we're talking about a movie?
@@garylancaster8612 This cake is baked…there’s no coming back from THEIR insanity. Their demands are not reasonable, based in reality or even possible. Throughout history, whenever two opposing forces collide such as this, there’s only one inevitable outcome…full blown war with one side finding it necessary to inflict noble violence in order to bring back balance. Balance for good against evil.
@joshuamunn2410Essentially a civil war with extra steps at the beginning. The very first of the Federalist Papers explains how breaking up would lead to fights over resources.
To be fair… I don’t know if they meant to but they definitely came off as terrible people. I think they actually tried to make them seem cool and brave but they come off as out of touch, heartless, selfish, weirdos. One of the main characters, a male journalist, is a huge creep says that the violence makes him hard he gets drunk and hits on this young girl that wants to become a photo journalist and tries to pull off a “the world is ending we should make love” type thing with the girl and fails lol so weird.
@@joeymedina7115that last part is not true The rest is, but it's hammered on your head over and over that the reason why they're like that is because of the trauma from doing war journalism, and the effects of the Civil war.
@@Cund I was exaggerating he didn’t literally ask her to have sex in the back of the truck but he wanted to be with her. It’s obvious throughout the movie that he wants to smash lol. I did watch the movie… I can tell you everything. Starts with president giving a speech. Then a suicide bombing. Then they go on the road and at the gas station one of the dudes hung two people and executes them and the girl starts crying. They get back on the road and I think the next part is the boog boys battle. Boog boys execute the captured soldiers. Then they go to that town that is acting like normal. Then I think it’s the Santa land sniper scene. Then the car scene where the Asian guy and the girl swap cars. Then the what kind of American are you… then big fat dude gets shot. Then they make it to Western Forces camp thingy then they go to DC. Huge battle. They go into the White House and execute the president. The end. Oh and Spider-Man’s girl gets shot and dies because she was saving the stupid young girl.
About three days ago, I saw an ad for this movie. "Oh, seems interesting" and gave it a good look. Once I read the word "journalists" I immediately stopped caring.
When I was younger I wanted to write a realistic story of what might happen if America broke up. I got out a map and had a long, detailed discussion with my dad and brother (the two most politically aware members of my family) about the general character and ideological viewpoints of each state and what they were likely to do. A lot of states would use their independence to go back to the basics of the Constitution and probably become better for it. Texas, for example, would love that, and it doesn't need anyone's help. However there are plenty of other states which would like to ally with them (California NOT being one of them). The biggest question is can two states ally successfully if they don't share borders? Perhaps, if they have the power to annex the territory in between, keep control over it, and still defend themselves from outside threats. This was important as I'm Arizonan and we share many traits with Texas, but doggonit, New Mexico is smack dab in between us. If we were an independent territory, I suspect we'd finish that Southern border wall, then erect one between us and California. Californian refugees would have to be carefully examined to make sure they weren't part of the problem. That's all just within the first 15 minutes of our conversation. The point, I guess, is that this "Civil War" didn't put enough thought into it.
Theoretically California might even be better off than Texas if they suddenly became their own thing. The issue is that Californian leadership keeps instituting policies that don't help the state but CA is a resource basin that in a different time period and with more than three countries in the general area would have had countless squabbles over control of it. There is a reason we kept it after the Mexican war.
@@jacquelineking5783 Both California and Texas would theoretically be better off since they have sufficient defense as well as coastal access to the largest ports in the US. Plus, they both contribute much more than they get back to the federal government. But, it would be both their best interest to maintain trade and access in order to have port access to Asia (through California) and Europe (through Texas). The same applies to all the states in between them. It would make much more sense for them to form at least an economic block if not an alliance. You'd have to be absolutely insane to build a wall between Texas and California. Even with Texas's ports people seem to forget that 40% of imports and 30% of exports in the US go through California. While Texas does have large ports for imports and exports as well, they need access to Asia. Without California, Texas's exports and electronics production would suffer immensely. California would benefit from oil, car, and cattle access through Texas while Texas would benefit from electronics, produce, and plane/aerospace stuff. Combine that with more self sufficiency in Arizona and New Mexican oil and the only weak spot would be Nevada, who is heavily reliant on tourism and produces far less.
@@ohnosmoarlulcatz Those are good thoughts. I had been thinking of a break down which included something of a breakdown in tech as well, so there would be less of an issue with sourcing parts for electronics. I was also thinking that without being held back by the federal government, California would likely become somewhat more totalitarian (at least, many of the laws they've attempted to implement in recent years have suggested such), and their economy and society would suffer as a result. The further social destabilization of California is where the wall comes in. But that's just one possibility. It's incredibly difficult to predict considering the many variables with which we're dealing. Another possibility is that Cali could breakup into several separate territories. As for Arizona, we do also still produce a lot of cattle, cotton, and citrus, as well as still having copper mines (though I haven't done the research on whether anyone else currently has a large need for that *edit:* we currently export copper to Mexico, apparently). We also have a surprising amount of farms, even in more arid areas. Our biggest issue would be sourcing water. I have several ideas for how that would be done (the science behind it is fun to research), but Lord knows our access to the Colorado River could be severely limited. As a whole it's a fascinating thought experiment!
@@jacquelineking5783 You are correct that it's more of an issue with independent governance than natural resources. I don't trust their government at all. They could, of course, end up breaking up into several states, which might end up being better for the people of Cali as well as the surrounding states.
I rolled my eyes and/or laughed at loud at EVERY trailer showed before Dune 2 started. Hollywood is at a low point. Even Dune 2 had its own eye rolling and laugh out loud moments.
My only thought when I heard about this movie was "Oh God, not another dystopia. I'm so sick of dystopian settings." And then I sat down, had a think, realized that some of my favorite movies are dystopian settings, and it's actually just how they've been handled in recent productions (and the absurd frequency with which they're handed out) that's made me sick at the thought of yet another addition to the Not Too Distant Future Dystopia pile.
@joshuamunn2410 Lee's most famous photograph is of the "antifa massacre". The director makes sure that we don't know if antifa does the killing or is killed by someone else. That's done on purpose.
I doubt it, you have no idea how many military believe in this, and how many retired, discharged vets are basically living for the day it begins. That’s how really, really bad it is out here. Once your 30 miles inland from the coast lines, most American’s are Based and well armed, and anti child traffickers…
I think with a little room for alternate World change Texas would ally probably with ANY state if the shared enemy is the federal goverment is Washington
SPOILERS . . . . Where are the damn drones? Why are you taking photos on hand held cameras using film? Where are your damn drones? Why do you keep driving blind into ambushes? Where are your damn drones? Why are you unable to maintain communications links? Where are your damn drones? Why are tanks, armoured vehicles and helicopters waiting in neat lines in a field, without enemy artillery targeting them? Where are their damn drones? Why do you search for the President on foot, in person, including embedded press, with no prior visibility inside? Where are your damn drones?
@disparutoo for real though, as an Afghan vet and history nerd I'm TERRIFIED of this becoming a thing, and all the signs are pointing to precisely this outcome. It's not gonna end well for the lefties, with the no guns and owning no land for food production and all...but they were once my countrymen and it's sad it had to come to this
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh the problem is they CAN'T...they only own the cities, and have to run their lines of supply through enemy-held territory...with a consumption rate than means if one gets cut for more than a day, tens of thousands start starving
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh The difference is when one side already owns them. Then the side on the offence has to attack, spending supplies, manpower, and fuel at about a 3:1 rate. Assuming firepower parity, You need to have 3:1 odds to even stand a chance at taking an objective without catastrophic losses
We’re okay with the Brits here in Maryland; we even have a fair amount of them. We also have a festival yearly that was held on Queen Elizabeth’s Government-Celebrated birthday (she, like my daughter, was born on 21 April but they didn’t officially celebrate until later when the weather was typically better. I guess that’s all gonna change now that the old girl has passed on.) where we drink a lot of UK-brewed beers, and eat lots of UK foods. If you ever see a ‘London Chippy’ food truck out and about (they’re in Virginia but come up to MD for the festival) STOP IMMEDIATELY AND RUN TO THEIR TRUCK. They have the best fish and chips you’ll ever eat in your life!
@@EatTheMarxists Trouble is that Brits (apart from me) pronounce Maryland incorrectly to American ears. Mary -Land as opposed to Merrylund. I've been there once only, to Sharpsburg to visit the battlefield. Lovely countryside I recall, very English looking. Fish and chips are great when you can guarantee the quality of them, so freshly cooked etc but if you buy them from a random chip shop without a recommendation they can be disappointing. Next time you go to the chip van see if they've got a tub of mushy peas to go with them and you have to have malt vinegar on them as well as salt!
These people forget that the Press are just supposed to inform, not take side or look for reasons. Just because current media doesn't work that way doesn't mean that isn't what it was born to do.
"Why are things escalating?!" cried the blue hair crazies while setting fires and bringing down statues, screaming and barking at anybody even slightly disagreeing with them.
Most of those articles , and many of the reviews appear to be written by self congratulatory pretentious but empty headed egotistical nobodies who had their dictionary of big words open and they actually say nothing , just spout words ….
These people are the reason I'm afraid of a civil war. They are like the doomsday people who are screaming about how the end is near... but seem to be way too happy and eager about that, that when it doesn't come, they might decide they need to kick it off personally.
@@Blackstar-yd3yf They're scared because of the eagerness some people have for civil war to happen. We shouldn't have to be ready in First World countries anyway.
The author of that article seems to think they know what "most" american's will take away from this movie. If there ever WAS a movie that is turning out to be a true reality for America, it isn't Civl War... it is the movie - Idiocracy
Yeah... AND I almost had to beat the crap out of Dax Shepard shortly after he filmed that. Not even starring in the movie taught his dumbass to behave. An actor turned to me, and said "he looks coked out". But you're right about America. It's really weird, wondering where all the adults are. Current people, who are 60 and under, seem like they don't understand basic life skills, or laws.
This is hilarious that these movie critics think there would actually be a war if the half of the country with guns, and food, went to war with people who live in cities, without guns... The hubris....
They need to be told who is who because if they feel sympathetic to a character who is supposedly "the enemy" irl, then it's a one way trip to cancel town. It's too risky to think for yourself.
It's presented like "Come and See". The kid in the movie has no context and understanding of WW2, only what is happening around him. None of it really makes any sense to him.
One has to wonder how much glue the writers were sniffing to decide Texas and California could or would form a “Western Alliance”? 😂 More than a couple of states separate those two 😀
It sounds pretty forgettable but I’m sure it’ll take in more than $2.4 million at the box office over the next few weeks. At the very least, a lot of people will see it out of morbid curiosity. I’ve really enjoyed some of A24’s horror films but I have no interest in seeing this, whatsoever.
Am I right in thinking one could read most of these 'reviews' and come away with no idea if this film is worth watching? What's that phrase? "You had one job."
"Civil War Critics Reviews INSANE Rants Hate Not Being Pandered Too" I know it's been a long day, but I still don't understand the title of this video😂
"this is grim warning with tensions rising in our public discourse, anyway you hear about the joke kevin heart made 15 years ago? he should be banished and never be able to work again as the horrible bigot he is, worst person ever !!"
Meanwhile, their behavior shows they would be the journalists in that franchise that just repeat the propaganda supporting the Purge because it's attacking the people they hate.
Its annoying that the biggest criticisms are 'its not catering to my political view enough'. Even some of the positive reviews seem to relate it to nothing about the actual movie. Both show they're worthless as reviewers as you can just guess their opinion on nearly everything.
I just watched it online, thank god I did not buy tickets for this. It is really silly and poorly made. The plot is stupid and the cast is worse. There are some scenes that are good, but in general it is horrible. There are clear pointers at certain groups in the US, who is the good and bad, but it is so badly made... Dont buy tickets...
I’m old enough to remember the movie “trigger effect”. It is what would happen (on a smaller scale) if there were a giant power outage and it lasted long enough to question if it’ll ever come back.
I saw this movie last night and I guess I showed up for a different movie than the critics. I will say that the lack of world building is accurate, you dont get details handed to you about why whats happening is happening but the movie is entirely character driven. I think the exact same characters could be picked up and put down anywhere in the world with a war happening and the same experiences could be had. Dunst literally has a line in the film which is something to the effect of, I went to wars and sent back photos in hopes America would understand how terrible getting to this point is and yet here we are. I thought the movie did a really great job of actually being neutral and honestly though it wasnt my personal cup of tea film wise, I think the movie itself was really good. I could be wrong but I got more of a feeling the objective of the movie was not to pick sides, but to point out that if we end up here...there is no winning side, we will all do terrible things, we will all lose.
I think some people have forgotten what movies are for, wanting everything to depict reality and believable instead of being fiction and for entertainment purposes.
Some of the criticism of this movie is showing that the dumbing down of the general audience over the past decades has worked. People can't take sublty or ambigousness anymore - as you said, they need it spelled out how to feel about the movie, because that's what movies have done for half an eternity by now. Those are the same people who rather watch a girlboss movie that flatout says to the audience: "She is tough" rather than showing that she actually is.
Imo a new American civil war is likely to be more like the English Civil War of the mid-1600s than the American Civil War a couple centuries later: something like a quasi-religious war with guerilla aspects rather than a bunch of pitched battles between armies.
It is so weird, for if the creators would have taken a stand, they would have been criticized for pandering for agenda. Now that is neutral, they are criticized it for its mild take.
@@boobah5643 Yeah, because their art has nothing to say. It's narrative cowardice. There is no point in its existence other than to make money. Even Transformers is braver. Making a movie about a Civil War and being unwilling to say anything political is yellow bellied chicken shit. You don't make a movie about Civil War, only to make money unless you devoid of any artistic integrity.
There is a line in one of the columns being reviewed that said something like 'Dunst's character is famous among her fellow journalists'. Yeah. Think about that. She is a journalist respected within her journalist world. Not within the greater public, but without the safe space of her MSM happy land. I think that sums up everything wrong with this movie and the people who like it. This is a core problem with The Left. They believe so totally in their own vision and objectives that they violently reject conversations that question them. So they refuse to 'read the room' so to speak and assume that everyone else secretly supports them. So they believe somehow that when the war turns civil that millions of their fellows will rise up and support them, which completely ignores the fact that if everyone supported 'them' in the first place we would be living in a massive Left Happy Land where EVERYONE agreed with them.
>>This is a core problem with The Left. They believe so totally in their own vision and objectives that they violently reject conversations that question them. So they refuse to 'read the room' so to speak and assume that everyone else secretly supports them.
Leftist journalists: "I love that New Disney Remake takes a nuanced view of the old black-and-white story, and depicts the classic villain through the lens of a misunderstood and tragic victim." Also leftist journalists: "How dare this film make a nuanced depiction of a new American civil conflict!? That's dangerously close to both-sides-ism!"
It isn't even "both sides." The movie doesn't tell us what started the war or whether the correct people are winning. It mentions a few bad things the president did, but no _~why_~ those events happened.
lol.. the NPCs literally need to have their programming updated because, God forbid they actually use their own judgement and discernment to determine how to interpret the film. They are terrified that if they don’t respond appropriately that they will be canceled by their fellow ideologues. A sign of the dystopian times.
Haha they should say “ordinary citizens take up arms against people that have no idea what a charging handle is and half end up accidentally ending themselves” lol. True story I asked two woke people what a charging handle was and they looked at me perplexed. I’m sure those people will do wonderful if there really was a civil war haha
@@angelantayhua3096roughly 49% of the world's legal firearms are owned by 35% of Americans. Outside of a few ideologically isolated areas (big cities with strict gun control), I am willing to bet "Yes" most ordinary citizens know what a charging handle is. (At least here in the states)
This reminded me that unsubbing from Grace Randolph wasn't JUST because being yelled at in a voice like a soprano chainsaw was doing genuine emotional harm, but because she's a weird mixture of 5 parts fairness, 15 parts bigotry and the rest is noise 😢
Of cores they don't think it's accurate. They live in a five street bubble were every one think, eat and dress the same. I saw this clip when it was two minutes old. It is 23 minutes long and have six down votes. Their is no chance they have seen the clip made a decision and down voted it.
Having both Asperger's syndrome and having seen this movie, the fact that the director actually let me piece things together for a change is a bona fide strength.
"Please, Sir: Can you provide an inkling as to which of the two sides in this internecine conflict has the morally superior argument?" The movie provides not a single clue.
If the writer had really wanted to present a realistic picture of war, no one would have wanted to see the movie. It would have been 97% sitting in mud, swatting away the flies, having a gagging session when the wind blew from the direction of a few decomposing bodies, watching intently every waking moment but rarely seeing anything interesting, hearing activity just out of visual range so that you are worried about its source but are unable to identify what it is, being subjected to the sound of an incoming mortar round that makes your sphincter tighten up but lands just out of sight, and occasionally taking fire from unknown sources but being unable to return fire without exposing just enough of yourself to take a round from a sniper. Add constant hunger, thirst, dysentery, various smells that are unpleasant, lice, rats, maggots, etc. Then two scenes where the enemy is actually visible and some fire is exchanged and then it’s back to trying to figure out where they went, where they are, where are they going, and do they have plans for you?
My main gripe about the movie was how it was marketed in the trailer. It presented itself as something entirely different from what I experienced. I felt like I'd been catfished. If you examine the trailers, ALL of them and their emphasis, you'll understand why many people felt misled.
Civil War reviews are out and while I’d not seen it at the time of recording, I have now. And the critics reviews seemed wild and unhinged before the movie, and now their Civil War takes are even worse. What do you think of what you saw? Let me know your thoughts down below and as always, thanks for watching :)
I hope you're having a fine time in Vegas. I would be there if I could. 😊
welcome to Las Vegas, USA!
@@quatore-5886 Why is Disparu in Las Vegas?
@@smoothsketch Why is Disparu in Las Vegas?
It was a pretty mid movie. It was a movie about "war photographers' experiences", above anything else. The civil war aspect of the plot wasn't even that strong.
"It wasn't bashing conservatives enough" - most reviews, translated.
Feels like most media today bashes conservatives all the time.
Amerikans hate America. ;D
I mean, is anyone surprised at this point? I’m more taken back by how the movie seems to take a neutral stance, that never happens anymore
"It wasn't assuaging my fears that conservatives are going to completely and utterly destroy leftists in a civil war".
FTFY.
@@FobiddenMexican At least some of the reviewers were aware enough to realize that the film wasn't trying to favour one side over the other. But they still had voice their displeasure about it.
"it didn't tell me that orange man was bad, 1/10" - critics
Except it did, considering the president in the movie is modeled after Trump and they end him in the climax. The critics can't be bothered to admit that part though.
@@Greshgore Ended him by a 🍫 person or the mere mentioning by the actress in the movie that talks about the unfortunate end for the Aunt Tifa group. Critics definitely won't ever admit that.
@@Ghost101 oh yes " I was on the ground at the antifa massacre" and one of the more psycho reporters acting like the helicopter door gunner in Full Metal Jacket, wanting to run toward a firefight because "I have such a H-O (engorged male, good lord navigating TH-cam's censorship in order to not get my comment hidden is a pain in the rear) for this @#$%!"
My recent comment just mentioning a negative opinion of the worlds largest asset manager was removed
@Greshgore What I like about it is the WF talk about the 3rd term, and dismantling of FBI and airstrikes on civilians *yet* every combat action by them is a WF war crime. They murk wounded enemy combatants, the Press Secretary, the Secret Service, civil servants, summarily execute 3 uniformed surrendered enemy combatants... and pose for a DEI deer trophy picture with POTUS after he begs for his life. It's like the US version of "Come and See".
The most absurd part of this movie is California and Texas teaming up on anything…
Yep
As a Texan I definitely agree.
@@AshkihyenaTexas does not need ANYONES help. Love your state.
It was done on purpose so that the freaks Dispy was covering could not claim this is inciting an **actual** insurrection. Cali would have to survive an apocalypse to grow up enough to team with Texas.
It comes from the idea that Texas will soon flip to a blue state. Due to all the Californians moving there and making the state woke/blue/liberal
Its like when the movie The Joker came out, they wanted people to actually get killed to prove their delusional points.
The "leftie lecturing class" doesn't want to be good. They want to be in the right. ... even thought they are in the left. 😏 °badum dish.exe°
I remember, the "news" reporters were practically salivating visibly at the thought of the 'impending' blood bath.
They don't understand people. That's how we win.
@@thetruth45678Journalists generally don't understand people because they are sociopaths and narcissists. To some degree I think narcissism actually fuels interest in journalism, especially any kind of "I'm making the world a better place with my work!" mentalities.
The good ones are the obsessive dudes that are willing to torch their own careers and reputation in search of the truth.
@@thetruth45678they need to be human to understand humans
TH-cam critics: "The bad guy is too obviously a bad caricature of Trump. I don't like it."
Media critics: "They aren't obvious enough about saying the bad guy is Trump. I don't like it."
Reddit critics: "I was hoping for an hour and a half of everyone shooting a giant Trump with rocket launchers."
4Chan critics: "I was hoping for 'The Turner Diaries: The Motion Picture.'"
This is a movie that separates people who shove politics into everything and people who can sit and just watch a movie without bias.
Lol ya I saw that as well
The hilarity of the idea that Texas would be apart of the side fighting against Trump too 😂😂😂
We all know if there was a civil war, the libs would be annihilated lol it wouldn't even be much of a war
*1/10 -*
No Tim Pool running around with a rifle and megaphone screaming *"I warned you, I warned you all!".*
😂
Tim Pool would also then stop and wedge his butt on a fence and say, "Well, they have a point too.."
@@Alondro77 EXACTLY!!! :D :D :D sounds perfectly like that bald midget xDDD
Tim would still be finding a fence to sit on.
While his Jewish producers book more Jews for his podcasts.
World’s largest I Told You So
You'd think these guys got enough one-sided chaos and one large group of people being called evil back during the Summer of Love.
It will never be enough. If they had nobody else to blame for their problems, they would have to take responsibility for their own actions.
Summer of love wasn’t as bad as rittenhouse to most of them
School stopped championing teaching critical rational thought. Civilization built on common sense and critical thinking collapses.
Who'd a thought?
(Answer: Anyone who'd learned critical thought)
@@M-S_4321 gotta crack a few eggs if you want an omelette
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh should've rephrased it like "if you want to make the mother of all omelettes, don't fret over every egg"
They dont understand that, if everyone's dying around you - especially if you didn't want a war, you care more about when it ends than why it started.
@@Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0000 I know people who legitimately think that women need to be in combat role because it's good for their self-esteem. Most Americans have NO idea what war is.
@@2012sonoraI just want to see them in stormtrooper roles so they get the diversity and same rights as men
@@2012sonora won't be so good for their self esteem when they experience the horrors that always happen to women in warzones since the beginning of time. It's never good..
@@Demiurge13 You mean, they deliberately don't get killed and get captured instead? Sounds like that's just going to inflate their self-esteem more than ever.
@@3dmaster205 no, in every war since the beginning of man they were toys. Do i really need to spell it out for you?
Years of lowering standards in schools and now you can see the effect in Hollywood. 😂😂
You don’t have to be educated to virtue signal, rage bait, and outright lie to earn money and attention.
@@angelantayhua3096
Maybe not, but it *DOES* help one do it better
Think this was made by a Brit
@angelantayhua3096 you need to be to actually succeed in what they want to achieve.
How so? Please explain
Honestly, during that big pause after you said “you can imagine they were incredibly unhappy…” I was just muttering, “that’s a fair bet, when are they ever not?”
I hope they all realize if any of them actually found themselves in this situation; they'd be the first ones to fold and give up or get gone.
They don't realize that. They are sure some form of daddy government will save them. It's the only thing they believe in.
They'll be the people panicking the most. And would most likely be the backstabber, if put in a group.
Or finding out what kinda Americans they are 😉
they'll be the first one running into a corner and beg for mercy the moment a single enemy scout shows up
fold like a cheap lawn chair
While I can agree with much of what Disparu says about the critic's reactions, I don't think they are disappointed that the film does not clearly tell them who to hate, but rather disappointed that it does not clearly tell "the audience" they want to tell who to hate, who to hate.
Here’s a “onesideism”:
One side doesn’t have a clue about how an actual current Civil War would pan out and one side is pretty calm because they know exactly how it would pan out.
And the side that wants a war is the side that is confused about how it would play out
Last time I checked...the only ones who know how to use a gun and dont hurt themselfs are the "not so TRAIN TRAIN progresive" :D :D
@@intrepidfool Well, that's why it's called F*ck around and find out.
Unless the side that knows how it would plan out knows it would be a thoroughly sacked country which would end with some sort of authoritarian regime no one knows how it would playout.
That isn't even getting into people not appreciating how none of us are self sufficient. Yes the cities might be the worst out of us but even people living on farms aren't self efficient compared to what they once were.
@@intrepidfool
That's why they want it. War is something exciting that happens somewhere outside of their ivory towers.
Not only were many of the critics oblivious to the implications in the movie, they're also totally oblivious to the fact a civil war in our reality would have nothing to do with race. In the lands of Hollywood and DC, Ignorance is king.
^would have nothing to do with race.? Tell me more about how out of touch you are with reality and the kalergi plan of population replacement. 🙄
Nor does it in the movie.
@@richardmcenroe2582 Exactly....which is what drives the woke critics crazy.
“ Hard to hold in my emotions while watching this”
Flushes toilet*
what Disparu was reading in those article is textbook predictive programming.... I hope ppl understand that..
Please define "predictive programming."
@@CharlesUrban when the media puts things out there in the movies/tv shows/ and or music that come true to one degree or another... when its as heavy handed as this narrative has been since 2016/17, and really even before that, they generally happen..
A great example of this is the Simpsons. According to karmic law, they are supposed to show the public what they are doing. @CharlesUrban
@@billybadass3056 Gotcha. Thank you!
It absolutely is predictive programming.
My God Hollywood, the US is a Federal Republic not a democracy.
🤡
More constitutional republic but yeah
You're undermining democracy by saying that.
Everything undermines our "democracy" according to clown news networks.
Oligarchy
@@rosssoyka860 Only when citizens let it become it.
The greatest reaction to this film was NOT that a civil war was POSSIBLE in current day America, but that there is no way Texas and California would team up!
Its cause people saying that are ignorant of the history of their own country and states.
California and Texas very much would team up assuming certain factors were in play.
@@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent And Hawaii being bought my France is possible. Under the right circumstances. The director states that the whole California and Texas was solely done. To tell people directly this is a fantasy setting. In an interview.
This is the dumbest take ever
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent not even remotely correct
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
However it is more likely that Mexico and Texas would team up
“Everything needing to be spelled out for them” is pretty much how Netflix rewrote Avatar the Last Airbender.
Some of them sound like the audience that liked the Netflix version cuz they like being slapped in the face with too much meaningless exposition from the rewritten characters and backstories. 🤦♀️
It’s also still strange how some people confuse reality with fiction.
"it's also still strange how some people confuse reality with fiction."
Well, many of these guys did spend most of the last 8 years calling DJT "he who must not be named" and calling themselves "the resistance"...
@@quigonkenny fair enough
Netflix ruined the cinema going *audiences*
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh unfortunately, yeah..
@@Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0000 fair enough XD
"What's this movie about?"
"No one actually knows."
The influence of war on various parts of society. The war itself is just set dressing and the "main characters" are just a vehicle to show us various consequences to various groups in the country.
Wrong, it’s about the removal of the Federal Govt and the take over of DC at any and all cost- you must not have watched it.
"What do you think about Civil War?"
Neccessary. I'm sick of living with the left and don't want them to have any kind of vote in how I have to live my life.
Wait, we're talking about a movie?
Based
I used to worry that there would be a civil war. Now I worry there won't be.
@joshuamunn2410 yeah, but no-fault national divorce always favors the leftists
@@garylancaster8612
This cake is baked…there’s no coming back from THEIR insanity. Their demands are not reasonable, based in reality or even possible. Throughout history, whenever two opposing forces collide such as this, there’s only one inevitable outcome…full blown war with one side finding it necessary to inflict noble violence in order to bring back balance. Balance for good against evil.
@joshuamunn2410Essentially a civil war with extra steps at the beginning. The very first of the Federalist Papers explains how breaking up would lead to fights over resources.
It was dumb because it operated on the assumption that journalists were noble.
it most certainly doesn't though.
This guy gets it @@nick1635
It literally didn't, but okay.
It didn’t portray them that way at all. It showed them as people, and each of them was different in his/her own right.
Exactly the opposite.
If it depicts journalists as anything other than pieces of shite, then it's a fantasy movie.
To be fair… I don’t know if they meant to but they definitely came off as terrible people. I think they actually tried to make them seem cool and brave but they come off as out of touch, heartless, selfish, weirdos. One of the main characters, a male journalist, is a huge creep says that the violence makes him hard he gets drunk and hits on this young girl that wants to become a photo journalist and tries to pull off a “the world is ending we should make love” type thing with the girl and fails lol so weird.
@@joeymedina7115that last part is not true
The rest is, but it's hammered on your head over and over that the reason why they're like that is because of the trauma from doing war journalism, and the effects of the Civil war.
lol, nvm, I can see from your other comments you probably didn't even watch the movie because you legit have no clue what's going on
@@Cund I was exaggerating he didn’t literally ask her to have sex in the back of the truck but he wanted to be with her. It’s obvious throughout the movie that he wants to smash lol. I did watch the movie… I can tell you everything. Starts with president giving a speech. Then a suicide bombing. Then they go on the road and at the gas station one of the dudes hung two people and executes them and the girl starts crying. They get back on the road and I think the next part is the boog boys battle. Boog boys execute the captured soldiers. Then they go to that town that is acting like normal. Then I think it’s the Santa land sniper scene. Then the car scene where the Asian guy and the girl swap cars. Then the what kind of American are you… then big fat dude gets shot. Then they make it to Western Forces camp thingy then they go to DC. Huge battle. They go into the White House and execute the president. The end. Oh and Spider-Man’s girl gets shot and dies because she was saving the stupid young girl.
Journalism is a top ten profession for socialpathes actually
About three days ago, I saw an ad for this movie. "Oh, seems interesting" and gave it a good look. Once I read the word "journalists" I immediately stopped caring.
It was all downhill once reporters renamed themselves “journalists.”
Is there any specific reason the right hates war correspondents?
Yet there is no trace of any journalist in this movie. Barely photo reporters. Writing nothing.
Weird flex on yourself there. Most people aren't that sensitive.
When I was younger I wanted to write a realistic story of what might happen if America broke up. I got out a map and had a long, detailed discussion with my dad and brother (the two most politically aware members of my family) about the general character and ideological viewpoints of each state and what they were likely to do. A lot of states would use their independence to go back to the basics of the Constitution and probably become better for it.
Texas, for example, would love that, and it doesn't need anyone's help. However there are plenty of other states which would like to ally with them (California NOT being one of them). The biggest question is can two states ally successfully if they don't share borders? Perhaps, if they have the power to annex the territory in between, keep control over it, and still defend themselves from outside threats. This was important as I'm Arizonan and we share many traits with Texas, but doggonit, New Mexico is smack dab in between us. If we were an independent territory, I suspect we'd finish that Southern border wall, then erect one between us and California. Californian refugees would have to be carefully examined to make sure they weren't part of the problem.
That's all just within the first 15 minutes of our conversation. The point, I guess, is that this "Civil War" didn't put enough thought into it.
That first 15 minutes you spent was more thought than Garland put into this entire movie. Well said.
Theoretically California might even be better off than Texas if they suddenly became their own thing. The issue is that Californian leadership keeps instituting policies that don't help the state but CA is a resource basin that in a different time period and with more than three countries in the general area would have had countless squabbles over control of it. There is a reason we kept it after the Mexican war.
@@jacquelineking5783 Both California and Texas would theoretically be better off since they have sufficient defense as well as coastal access to the largest ports in the US. Plus, they both contribute much more than they get back to the federal government. But, it would be both their best interest to maintain trade and access in order to have port access to Asia (through California) and Europe (through Texas). The same applies to all the states in between them. It would make much more sense for them to form at least an economic block if not an alliance.
You'd have to be absolutely insane to build a wall between Texas and California. Even with Texas's ports people seem to forget that 40% of imports and 30% of exports in the US go through California. While Texas does have large ports for imports and exports as well, they need access to Asia. Without California, Texas's exports and electronics production would suffer immensely. California would benefit from oil, car, and cattle access through Texas while Texas would benefit from electronics, produce, and plane/aerospace stuff. Combine that with more self sufficiency in Arizona and New Mexican oil and the only weak spot would be Nevada, who is heavily reliant on tourism and produces far less.
@@ohnosmoarlulcatz Those are good thoughts. I had been thinking of a break down which included something of a breakdown in tech as well, so there would be less of an issue with sourcing parts for electronics. I was also thinking that without being held back by the federal government, California would likely become somewhat more totalitarian (at least, many of the laws they've attempted to implement in recent years have suggested such), and their economy and society would suffer as a result. The further social destabilization of California is where the wall comes in. But that's just one possibility. It's incredibly difficult to predict considering the many variables with which we're dealing. Another possibility is that Cali could breakup into several separate territories.
As for Arizona, we do also still produce a lot of cattle, cotton, and citrus, as well as still having copper mines (though I haven't done the research on whether anyone else currently has a large need for that *edit:* we currently export copper to Mexico, apparently). We also have a surprising amount of farms, even in more arid areas. Our biggest issue would be sourcing water. I have several ideas for how that would be done (the science behind it is fun to research), but Lord knows our access to the Colorado River could be severely limited.
As a whole it's a fascinating thought experiment!
@@jacquelineking5783 You are correct that it's more of an issue with independent governance than natural resources. I don't trust their government at all. They could, of course, end up breaking up into several states, which might end up being better for the people of Cali as well as the surrounding states.
when the trailer was shown during dune 2, my whole theater started laughing when it said california and texas teamed up
I rolled my eyes and/or laughed at loud at EVERY trailer showed before Dune 2 started. Hollywood is at a low point. Even Dune 2 had its own eye rolling and laugh out loud moments.
@@MrJacksspleensuch as?
My only thought when I heard about this movie was "Oh God, not another dystopia. I'm so sick of dystopian settings."
And then I sat down, had a think, realized that some of my favorite movies are dystopian settings, and it's actually just how they've been handled in recent productions (and the absurd frequency with which they're handed out) that's made me sick at the thought of yet another addition to the Not Too Distant Future Dystopia pile.
🎶 In the not too distant future. Next Sunday A.D. 🎶
😊
Last really horrible dystopia I saw in the theatres was "Sex & the City 2."
These people calling for this, have no idea what they’re wishing for. They’d be the first ones to fall if this country really went down this road
@joshuamunn2410 Lee's most famous photograph is of the "antifa massacre". The director makes sure that we don't know if antifa does the killing or is killed by someone else. That's done on purpose.
I doubt it, you have no idea how many military believe in this, and how many retired, discharged vets are basically living for the day it begins. That’s how really, really bad it is out here. Once your 30 miles inland from the coast lines, most American’s are Based and well armed, and anti child traffickers…
Just like how they'd be the first ones in the Salt Mines if the Commie regime they so clearly want takes over.
Yea the right are pitiful, hopefully they have bought their orange man bibles.
@@iandevine3063the left can't meme
This film said Texas and California allied in a civil war. I can't suspend my disbelief that far.😂
Well, it's a dystopian future, maybe Texas is just Austin, but bigger now.
Nah, the press being impartial is the real fantasy.
The most plausible scenario is both states are so overrun by Mexicans and other foreigners that they aren't really American states at all.
I think with a little room for alternate World change Texas would ally probably with ANY state if the shared enemy is the federal goverment is Washington
SPOILERS
.
.
.
.
Where are the damn drones?
Why are you taking photos on hand held cameras using film? Where are your damn drones?
Why do you keep driving blind into ambushes? Where are your damn drones?
Why are you unable to maintain communications links? Where are your damn drones?
Why are tanks, armoured vehicles and helicopters waiting in neat lines in a field, without enemy artillery targeting them? Where are their damn drones?
Why do you search for the President on foot, in person, including embedded press, with no prior visibility inside? Where are your damn drones?
Better to skip the movie and visit a gun store while visiting for kicks; it’s what Hollywood wouldn’t have wanted
Legit 💯👍
@disparutoo for real though, as an Afghan vet and history nerd I'm TERRIFIED of this becoming a thing, and all the signs are pointing to precisely this outcome. It's not gonna end well for the lefties, with the no guns and owning no land for food production and all...but they were once my countrymen and it's sad it had to come to this
Ah, to be ignorant... To see symptoms and ignore the real disease.
Don’t worry if that happens they’ll outsource to the highest bidders
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh the problem is they CAN'T...they only own the cities, and have to run their lines of supply through enemy-held territory...with a consumption rate than means if one gets cut for more than a day, tens of thousands start starving
@@PopeMetallicus great point. But most sieges are about cutting off supply routes? Or capturing them?
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh The difference is when one side already owns them. Then the side on the offence has to attack, spending supplies, manpower, and fuel at about a 3:1 rate. Assuming firepower parity, You need to have 3:1 odds to even stand a chance at taking an objective without catastrophic losses
I like that you've gone back to holding the microphone for a bit, you seem more animated. 😊
I do prefer him hold the mic. It’s fun!
Now if we could just talk him into better hair care and some (cosmetic?) dentistry ….
@Darkstar-se6wc Get a grip kid. His appearance is fine.
You being British already offends 13 states, mine being one of them. 😂
Joking, of course.
This movie was written by a Brit I believe
Ingrates
@@JoseMolina-jz9hh That could explain the Texas and California as allies.😂😂
We’re okay with the Brits here in Maryland; we even have a fair amount of them. We also have a festival yearly that was held on Queen Elizabeth’s Government-Celebrated birthday (she, like my daughter, was born on 21 April but they didn’t officially celebrate until later when the weather was typically better. I guess that’s all gonna change now that the old girl has passed on.) where we drink a lot of UK-brewed beers, and eat lots of UK foods. If you ever see a ‘London Chippy’ food truck out and about (they’re in Virginia but come up to MD for the festival) STOP IMMEDIATELY AND RUN TO THEIR TRUCK. They have the best fish and chips you’ll ever eat in your life!
@@EatTheMarxists Trouble is that Brits (apart from me) pronounce Maryland incorrectly to American ears. Mary -Land as opposed to Merrylund. I've been there once only, to Sharpsburg to visit the battlefield. Lovely countryside I recall, very English looking. Fish and chips are great when you can guarantee the quality of them, so freshly cooked etc but if you buy them from a random chip shop without a recommendation they can be disappointing. Next time you go to the chip van see if they've got a tub of mushy peas to go with them and you have to have malt vinegar on them as well as salt!
These people forget that the Press are just supposed to inform, not take side or look for reasons. Just because current media doesn't work that way doesn't mean that isn't what it was born to do.
It’s been all downhill since reporters renamed themselves journalists.
@@Darkstar-se6wc absolutely. 🤜🤛
>>forget that the Press are just supposed to inform, not take side
"Why are things escalating?!" cried the blue hair crazies while setting fires and bringing down statues, screaming and barking at anybody even slightly disagreeing with them.
16:03 "His resume is populated by zombies, clones and aliens... seriously, you could have just said he made movies about California"
😂😂😂
Disparu is too funny, guys.😂 When he imitates the voices of stupid "reviewers" it's just what I imagine them sounding like to be honest.
They cant handle the truth
They've been hiding it pretty well from half the world. I'd say they handle it quite well, just evil
Most of those articles , and many of the reviews appear to be written by self congratulatory pretentious but empty headed egotistical nobodies who had their dictionary of big words open and they actually say nothing , just spout words ….
My theory is most folks are so full of themselves it will cause a civil war through civil discussions and discourse lol
They’re all upset that their side wasn’t portrayed as “the good guys”.
My man pulled up with a handheld mic 😂 gotta love it
These people are the reason I'm afraid of a civil war. They are like the doomsday people who are screaming about how the end is near... but seem to be way too happy and eager about that, that when it doesn't come, they might decide they need to kick it off personally.
Why wouldn't one be happy about this fallen evil world ending and the ability to finally go home?
So just because some people care about beeing prepared you are scared because you are not ready ? 😂
@@StandefiantBecause you won't?
@@Blackstar-yd3yf They're scared because of the eagerness some people have for civil war to happen. We shouldn't have to be ready in First World countries anyway.
@@Standefiant Because there are aspects of this world that some of us enjoy.
"Also, those doors aren't going to help ya. You need to get behind the engine block." Nice!
Basically, give us your money…to support our agenda?
No they could not care less about the “agenda”; they just want money.
It is Amazon after all (a24)
... What?
The author of that article seems to think they know what "most" american's will take away from this movie. If there ever WAS a movie that is turning out to be a true reality for America, it isn't Civl War... it is the movie - Idiocracy
Or Demolition Man.
Yeah... AND I almost had to beat the crap out of Dax Shepard shortly after he filmed that. Not even starring in the movie taught his dumbass to behave. An actor turned to me, and said "he looks coked out". But you're right about America. It's really weird, wondering where all the adults are. Current people, who are 60 and under, seem like they don't understand basic life skills, or laws.
Wait, so considering both sides of a story/argument is a bad thing now?! The smeg is that person on? 😂
communism and identity politics
Americans project their own politics onto the movie because it doesn't tell you what to think.
Grace Randolph has the self awareness of of Sea Sponge. And the knowledge of a kid in Kindergarten.
I don't think you're giving kindergarteners and sea sponges enough credit. 😝
Reminds me of this Groucho quote: I've got the mind of a four year old. I'll bet he was glad to be rid of it.
This is hilarious that these movie critics think there would actually be a war if the half of the country with guns, and food, went to war with people who live in cities, without guns... The hubris....
South Carolina stays loyal to the US in this world? What?
They need to be told who is who because if they feel sympathetic to a character who is supposedly "the enemy" irl, then it's a one way trip to cancel town. It's too risky to think for yourself.
It's presented like "Come and See". The kid in the movie has no context and understanding of WW2, only what is happening around him. None of it really makes any sense to him.
"Characters of Color" = COC
🤣
Big COC in this film lol
CLASH OF CLANS
Real quick, you’re looking healthier, Disparu. I dunno what you’re doing but it’s working. Good for you, mate
And on a side note here, we hope you are well!
Guys an alcoholic
Now if he’d just go for better hair care and maybe some (cosmetic?) dentistry ….
One has to wonder how much glue the writers were sniffing to decide Texas and California could or would form a “Western Alliance”? 😂 More than a couple of states separate those two 😀
"Intellectually timid and dramatically thin" is a perfectly valid criticism for any film.
More like: MORALLY timid!
‘Civil War’ will be forgotten in similar fashion as ‘The American Society of Magical…’
Except this film is actually decent.
@@khylerbane4523 I not seeing nor do i want to. It is self loathing circle jerking for political fanfic'er it's cringe.
It sounds pretty forgettable but I’m sure it’ll take in more than $2.4 million at the box office over the next few weeks. At the very least, a lot of people will see it out of morbid curiosity.
I’ve really enjoyed some of A24’s horror films but I have no interest in seeing this, whatsoever.
Knee that grows
I doubt it. It was intense, very well written and directed, visceral and an all around masterpiece 😎
Am I right in thinking one could read most of these 'reviews' and come away with no idea if this film is worth watching?
What's that phrase? "You had one job."
"Civil War Critics Reviews INSANE Rants Hate Not Being Pandered Too"
I know it's been a long day, but I still don't understand the title of this video😂
“Civil War Critics’ Reviews INSANE Rants: Hate Not Being Pandered To”
Better?
As a South African, I find it so odd that California and Texas would form a coalition in this movie.
It would never happen
Mutual desire to leave a federal government neither always agrees with. It could happen if they intend to go their separate ways after.
"this is grim warning with tensions rising in our public discourse, anyway you hear about the joke kevin heart made 15 years ago? he should be banished and never be able to work again as the horrible bigot he is, worst person ever !!"
A reminder that these critics are the same kind of people that get nervous because they think the Purge films could happen.
Meanwhile, their behavior shows they would be the journalists in that franchise that just repeat the propaganda supporting the Purge because it's attacking the people they hate.
Anyone else thought he's just holding an air microphone because it blends into his black top? 😂
Everyone has a way of conveying 'I was right'. Maybe Disparu's could be an power air guitar. He's got the hair for it.
He’s traveling, probably what he had available to pack from the UK.
Yes thank you.
What type of screen are you watching this on?😯
Its annoying that the biggest criticisms are 'its not catering to my political view enough'.
Even some of the positive reviews seem to relate it to nothing about the actual movie. Both show they're worthless as reviewers as you can just guess their opinion on nearly everything.
I just watched it online, thank god I did not buy tickets for this. It is really silly and poorly made. The plot is stupid and the cast is worse. There are some scenes that are good, but in general it is horrible. There are clear pointers at certain groups in the US, who is the good and bad, but it is so badly made... Dont buy tickets...
appreciate the review - will be skipping it!
I sill haven’t found it online…. Yet.
@@tylerskiss You will, just keep looking
Much appreciated, you saved my time AND money haha
I could tell by the trailer it wasn’t gonna be good, especially with CA and Texas being on the same side somehow lol
I’m old enough to remember the movie “trigger effect”. It is what would happen (on a smaller scale) if there were a giant power outage and it lasted long enough to question if it’ll ever come back.
I saw this movie last night and I guess I showed up for a different movie than the critics. I will say that the lack of world building is accurate, you dont get details handed to you about why whats happening is happening but the movie is entirely character driven. I think the exact same characters could be picked up and put down anywhere in the world with a war happening and the same experiences could be had. Dunst literally has a line in the film which is something to the effect of, I went to wars and sent back photos in hopes America would understand how terrible getting to this point is and yet here we are. I thought the movie did a really great job of actually being neutral and honestly though it wasnt my personal cup of tea film wise, I think the movie itself was really good. I could be wrong but I got more of a feeling the objective of the movie was not to pick sides, but to point out that if we end up here...there is no winning side, we will all do terrible things, we will all lose.
Well, that's a message I can get behind. But the game of civilizational Jenga continues anyway...
>>but I got more of a feeling the objective of the movie was not to pick sides
I think some people have forgotten what movies are for, wanting everything to depict reality and believable instead of being fiction and for entertainment purposes.
Welcome to Vegas! Glad you made the flight! Great video, great night on FNT!
Disparu's honest and accurate rants feed a part of my soul that requires functional levels of IQ to even be accessed.
I really hate that I'm poor and can't afford to go to Vegas to meet Disparu. I hope Mrs. Nerdrotic gives him a haircut though 😂
It was great meeting you in Vegas. I look forward to your original music when you start composing.
I wouldn't call it "both side-ism" more like "neither side-ism"
Some of those critics are exactly the type of people who need a flashback to what happened 5 minutes ago in a movie.
They don't want the movie explained to them, they want it to be so heavy-handed that the rubes get it.
I'm starting to think Grace Randolph is a bit of a smooth brain...
What gave you that impression?
Making koalas look absolutely brilliant.
Some of the criticism of this movie is showing that the dumbing down of the general audience over the past decades has worked. People can't take sublty or ambigousness anymore - as you said, they need it spelled out how to feel about the movie, because that's what movies have done for half an eternity by now. Those are the same people who rather watch a girlboss movie that flatout says to the audience: "She is tough" rather than showing that she actually is.
>>People can't take sublty or ambigousness anymore
Imo a new American civil war is likely to be more like the English Civil War of the mid-1600s than the American Civil War a couple centuries later: something like a quasi-religious war with guerilla aspects rather than a bunch of pitched battles between armies.
Interesting, I see the similarities, in the IS it would be the Constitutionalists vs the Corporatists , or something like that
There were a few large set piece battles in the English Civil War: Edgehill, Marston Moor, Nasby, and Newbury.
It is so weird, for if the creators would have taken a stand, they would have been criticized for pandering for agenda. Now that is neutral, they are criticized it for its mild take.
Yeah, but the choice says something, because the truth is taking a stand is brave, while being neutral is cowardice.
@@kennyhudson9201 Yeah, it says they're not interested in alienating a large chunk of potential customers. The reasons for the war aren't the point.
@@boobah5643 Yeah, because their art has nothing to say. It's narrative cowardice. There is no point in its existence other than to make money. Even Transformers is braver. Making a movie about a Civil War and being unwilling to say anything political is yellow bellied chicken shit. You don't make a movie about Civil War, only to make money unless you devoid of any artistic integrity.
@@kennyhudson9201 >>neutral is cowardice
There is a line in one of the columns being reviewed that said something like 'Dunst's character is famous among her fellow journalists'.
Yeah. Think about that. She is a journalist respected within her journalist world. Not within the greater public, but without the safe space of her MSM happy land.
I think that sums up everything wrong with this movie and the people who like it.
This is a core problem with The Left. They believe so totally in their own vision and objectives that they violently reject conversations that question them. So they refuse to 'read the room' so to speak and assume that everyone else secretly supports them.
So they believe somehow that when the war turns civil that millions of their fellows will rise up and support them, which completely ignores the fact that if everyone supported 'them' in the first place we would be living in a massive Left Happy Land where EVERYONE agreed with them.
Good Points 👍👍
Yep,and there'd be rainbow UBI and unicorn farts for all. 🤣👍
>>This is a core problem with The Left. They believe so totally in their own vision and objectives that they violently reject conversations that question them. So they refuse to 'read the room' so to speak and assume that everyone else secretly supports them.
Leftist journalists: "I love that New Disney Remake takes a nuanced view of the old black-and-white story, and depicts the classic villain through the lens of a misunderstood and tragic victim."
Also leftist journalists: "How dare this film make a nuanced depiction of a new American civil conflict!? That's dangerously close to both-sides-ism!"
You act like consistency is valued in media commentary?
BS!
It isn't even "both sides." The movie doesn't tell us what started the war or whether the correct people are winning.
It mentions a few bad things the president did, but no _~why_~ those events happened.
lol.. the NPCs literally need to have their programming updated because, God forbid they actually use their own judgement and discernment to determine how to interpret the film. They are terrified that if they don’t respond appropriately that they will be canceled by their fellow ideologues. A sign of the dystopian times.
Haha they should say “ordinary citizens take up arms against people that have no idea what a charging handle is and half end up accidentally ending themselves” lol. True story I asked two woke people what a charging handle was and they looked at me perplexed. I’m sure those people will do wonderful if there really was a civil war haha
Obviously they think it's a handle for your phone charger
Do most ordinary citizens know what a charging handle is?
@@angelantayhua3096roughly 49% of the world's legal firearms are owned by 35% of Americans.
Outside of a few ideologically isolated areas (big cities with strict gun control), I am willing to bet "Yes" most ordinary citizens know what a charging handle is.
(At least here in the states)
"It could be right now, in fact, its just like someone disagreeing with me on twitter"
He is afraid of monsters under his bed. Jan 6th is the monster under his bed.
And the other guy he didn’t vote for.
The movie Vadered! It Vadered!
- Grace Randolph
This reminded me that unsubbing from Grace Randolph wasn't JUST because being yelled at in a voice like a soprano chainsaw was doing genuine emotional harm, but because she's a weird mixture of 5 parts fairness, 15 parts bigotry and the rest is noise 😢
You make good stuff dude, well written and thoughtful
Of cores they don't think it's accurate. They live in a five street bubble were every one think, eat and dress the same.
I saw this clip when it was two minutes old. It is 23 minutes long and have six down votes. Their is no chance they have seen the clip made a decision and down voted it.
Of cores 😂😂😂
Google Translate is not working on this one. 🧐
I will just wait a few months for the actual Civil War.
Having both Asperger's syndrome and having seen this movie, the fact that the director actually let me piece things together for a change is a bona fide strength.
Let's see how this year plays out.
"Please Sir, can you tell me how to think?" had me laughing hard
"Please, Sir: Can you provide an inkling as to which of the two sides in this internecine conflict has the morally superior argument?" The movie provides not a single clue.
Is Disparu in jail? That looks like a reinforced cell door behind him
Well, he's in america right now soooooo 😗
JK JK 😘
A jail with blue lights and a computer?? 😅
@@colincolin5696 Modern prison, a prison designed to change seasoned criminals and lgbt haters into valuable members of woke society
Maybe he's in Vegas with the rest of the fellowship.
That’s a return air cover on the right and curtained window on the left, he’s in a hotel.
If the writer had really wanted to present a realistic picture of war, no one would have wanted to see the movie. It would have been 97% sitting in mud, swatting away the flies, having a gagging session when the wind blew from the direction of a few decomposing bodies, watching intently every waking moment but rarely seeing anything interesting, hearing activity just out of visual range so that you are worried about its source but are unable to identify what it is, being subjected to the sound of an incoming mortar round that makes your sphincter tighten up but lands just out of sight, and occasionally taking fire from unknown sources but being unable to return fire without exposing just enough of yourself to take a round from a sniper. Add constant hunger, thirst, dysentery, various smells that are unpleasant, lice, rats, maggots, etc. Then two scenes where the enemy is actually visible and some fire is exchanged and then it’s back to trying to figure out where they went, where they are, where are they going, and do they have plans for you?
It's hilarious that people desperately want the movie to take a side…”please, say that my ideology is correct!” 😂
Critics liking media is frequently a red flag for me these days.
And Iron Man's not even in it
"You think you hate journalists enough, but you don't."
Anyone else reminded of the demented fever dream that was 'Red State'?
I read the synopsis to that movie. I knew I’d hate it. :/
My main gripe about the movie was how it was marketed in the trailer. It presented itself as something entirely different from what I experienced. I felt like I'd been catfished. If you examine the trailers, ALL of them and their emphasis, you'll understand why many people felt misled.
>>If you examine the trailers, ALL of them and their emphasis, you'll understand why many people felt misled.