The three new criminal laws - significant changes and key concerns

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 190

  • @AyushKumar-se6nn
    @AyushKumar-se6nn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    This is worrying. These laws were passed without discussions and inputs.

    • @SUKHPREETSINGH-hy2zp
      @SUKHPREETSINGH-hy2zp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Oh really; where is gender neutral laws ?
      What about misuse of sex 498, domestic violence ect ?
      Why need BNS 69 ?

    • @ajaygarg1139
      @ajaygarg1139 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      At the time of discussion, opposition parties were dancing in the well..

    • @Mohan-c8v
      @Mohan-c8v 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All have smartphones right, look at it

    • @ajaygarg1139
      @ajaygarg1139 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mohan-c8v in a country where politicians demand ballot papers, will its citizens ever use smartphone 😂

    • @Mohan-c8v
      @Mohan-c8v 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ajaygarg1139 Lol

  • @SatyaThatyaMithya
    @SatyaThatyaMithya 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Most of the MP have a criminal past or have criminal cases pending against them and the joke is to get these laws vetted from such elements.

    • @mehulsompura278
      @mehulsompura278 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      We all have elected them so the joke is on us

  • @aakashsuryavanshi4692
    @aakashsuryavanshi4692 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    RIP for Indian Justice system ⚰️💐
    Gender biased laws
    Stalking, Voyeurism, Disrobing, Sexual harrasment, Domestic violence, Rape, Abuse, Cruelty, Assualt, Only man can do these crime on women, Women can not do these crime on Men.

  • @nv9991
    @nv9991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Instead of supporting or opposing in a piecemeal manner, "Intellectuals" should jointly publish their own "ideal" version for each of these three laws. So that we ordinary citizens can compare and contrast the two versions.

    • @doswatch
      @doswatch 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      True, opposing farm laws, any new laws, gst changes, the pseudo seculars and semi-intellectuals should really publish alternative options for debate. Unfortunately, I presume they don't have the required competence to do so...anarchy is the only path they want to pursue...sad reality.

    • @shantanusapru
      @shantanusapru 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you a complete moron, or are you still under-training!!??!!
      Is this the job of 'intellectuals'?? That is the f**king govt's job, which is busy being as right wing authoritarian as this nation will allow...!!
      I bet you haven't even read these documents; and even if you did, I doubt, given the intellect behind your comment, that you would even understand anything!
      These new laws are 70-80% copy-paste from the old laws without any substantial changes (this even many lawyers have averred!
      One can logically argue that if there is so much overlap between the old & new ones, then what the heck is the need to bring in the new laws, which, by themselves, would lead to a ton - a TON! - of logistical & practical issues!?!?!
      As is usual with this govt., this is an absolutely idiotic, un-thought-out move; doing things just to do something!); but/and wherever the laws actually *have* been changed, most of the changes (not all, but most) have been made to make the criminal laws much more stringent; giving too much power in the hands of police/DM/govts! Human & individual rights have been relegated to a distant second place!
      This is very dangerous & will lead to a police state!
      In short, the new laws are asinine & pernicious both in concept, policy & practice!

    • @theultimateshield5133
      @theultimateshield5133 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who can I say is an intellectual or liberal or conservative or a nationalist whom are you really addressing here to create an ideal bill , I don't think any community says they don't have intellectuals right or left.

    • @shantanusapru
      @shantanusapru 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @nv9991: Are you a complete moron, or are you still under-training!!??!!
      Is this the job of 'intellectuals'?? That is the f$%king govt's job, which is busy being as right wing authoritarian as this nation will allow...!!
      I bet you haven't even read these documents; and even if you did, I doubt, given the intellect behind your comment, that you would even understand anything!
      These new laws are 70-80% copy-paste from the old laws without any substantial changes (this even many lawyers have averred!
      One can logically argue that if there is so much overlap between the old & new ones, then what the heck is the need to bring in the new laws, which, by themselves, would lead to a ton - a TON! - of logistical & practical issues!?!?!
      As is usual with this govt., this is an absolutely idiotic, un-thought-out move; doing things just to do something!); but/and wherever the laws actually *have* been changed, most of the changes (not all, but most) have been made to make the criminal laws much more stringent; giving too much power in the hands of police/DM/govts! Human & individual rights have been relegated to a distant second place!
      This is very dangerous & will lead to a police state!
      In short, the new laws are asinine both in concept, policy & practice!

    • @nv9991
      @nv9991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theultimateshield5133 Anyone who participates in talk shows and writes op-eds saying what is offered is stupid/dangerous/horrible... Instead of offering a talk show & op-eds, he should offer a total draft of his proposed ideal law.
      If HeroMoters believes that BajaAuto has a bad vehicle, they are not supposed to "talk" design of a better vehicle. HeroMoters should offer a better version.
      We, ordinary Indians, don't demand clear-cut final outputs from conflicting parties. We waste too much energy on listening to talk shows and reading op-eds.
      If you are opposing proposed Laws, what are your ideal drafts for each of these laws? I can read both copies and make up my mind. A much simpler and faster way to resolve conflict.

  • @mohammadsheeraz144
    @mohammadsheeraz144 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    So Congress and BJP in thier respective states will arm twist each other political enemies with the help of this new Police Discretionary powers.

  • @blankjohnson6934
    @blankjohnson6934 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Sad, this should happen in more democratic way and opposition and public view should be taken into consideration

  • @amodjp
    @amodjp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    More changes required to include criminal records along with aadhar data so that repeat offences in various states can be collated

  • @moradhwajrajpoot5457
    @moradhwajrajpoot5457 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Key concern or Deep concern is only concern without Finish line.

  • @Sahil-dj1ko
    @Sahil-dj1ko 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Before BNS FIR is mandatory & After BNS FIR is you choice on police department. Shame on you government & there is no Evidence how this law reforms without majority of mp and the speaker of parliament has been suspended 130 MP before law reforms 🤬

  • @subhashsahay5218
    @subhashsahay5218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    While these laws are rather good but the powers given to police is quite draconian in nature

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Draconian problems require draconian solutions

    • @subhashsahay5218
      @subhashsahay5218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ChandranPrema123 But the issue is these laws end up being nothing more than toolkits for governments to persecute their critics like journalists in UP and West Bengal

    • @rtam9894
      @rtam9894 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChandranPrema123 why repeal the new laws then

    • @s-qc9ns
      @s-qc9ns 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ChandranPrema123 when the government officials misuses these power which often happens in Bharat innocent people get fuked over.
      On top of that they have given more power to the highly corrupt police departments.

  • @grapeshott
    @grapeshott 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Just add "unity integrity sovereignty of India" and you can make any draconian law

    • @ytadltspv
      @ytadltspv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      apt summary of modi-shah fundamental idea of 'governance'. we only have rights to breathe to stay alive to pay taxes

  • @duvasrealm
    @duvasrealm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    It's good the ruling party is at least trying to refresh the arcade IPC, But the implementation without a public discourse at the very least a parliamentary consensus is authoritarian and pure illegal. This should be properly be contested and reformed with the help of Supreme Court by using non partisan intellectuals, as political parties in any side of the aisle will just love the idea of more power to them. There should be a line dividing the citizen privacy and criminal intent.

    • @-VAJRA-
      @-VAJRA- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Amendments would’ve sufficed. There was no need to absolutely repeal the old laws
      Lawyers are looking at a prosperous few years ahead while the judges will overburdened with the overhaul
      The biggest losses will be suffered by the litigants, be it time, money or peace of mind

    • @rsinghofficial_
      @rsinghofficial_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These laws are the need of hour to destroy fake news peddlers, propagandists, Urban naxals, separatists etc. This law was passed by majority voting, don't cry here

    • @saifsyed210
      @saifsyed210 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@-VAJRA- They have retained 75% of old laws just wordings and names have changed.

  • @ChandranPrema123
    @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Criminal being treated as Criminal is considered wrong then Supreme Court is the wrong person here😢

    • @samlee3039
      @samlee3039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Until a person is adjudged guilty by courts, they are presumed innocent.
      What you said goes against the very spirit of our jurisprudence and justice system.
      You can't call someone who is arrested and not found guilty criminal.

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@samlee3039justice delayed is justice denied 😭
      How sad

  • @jossydsouza3952
    @jossydsouza3952 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well explained. Thanks.

  • @rangavv
    @rangavv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thoroughly was in rapt attention to this excellent presentation. Very well done and absolutely enviable diction. Print is certainly attracting great talents. All Good Wishes. Will continue to contribute my little mite to all your genuine efforts.

  • @solorider108
    @solorider108 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fantastic news

  • @Sandy-qs5og
    @Sandy-qs5og 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great report from the journalist 👏

  • @shyamsud-ud4eg
    @shyamsud-ud4eg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    excessive power in hand of police will destroy the balance between civil liberties and tyranny of police. These laws should be debated again in parliament.

  • @SatyaThatyaMithya
    @SatyaThatyaMithya 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is more apt and necessary for new updated laws.

    • @adithyahk
      @adithyahk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who the F are you to say this

    • @isns2502
      @isns2502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tera baap ​@@adithyahk

    • @catcoder12
      @catcoder12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adithyahkreal id se aao

    • @adithyahk
      @adithyahk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@catcoder12 you are absolute nuts, bugger off

  • @rapaelarockiaraj8681
    @rapaelarockiaraj8681 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We people send MPs to represent us (people) - without MPs debate BJP passed all bills how can we accept this law. This lead to SC constitution bench will debate at courtroom.

  • @AnupSingh-yj2xb
    @AnupSingh-yj2xb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Change all laws including Civil laws to shorten the long case durations.

  • @HolkhomangHaokip-q1r
    @HolkhomangHaokip-q1r 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new laws will be headache for the court and police. How can we introduce such laws when many of police stations had no electricity, no mobile network or wifi. How can police charge sheet within 35, 50 days time, when forensic report takes years.
    A citizen in police custody for extended periods, this is inhuman. Hundreds of laws needs to be amended as it has a reference with CrPC.

  • @jpajpaassi6614
    @jpajpaassi6614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    🕉 Satyameva Jayate: Truth and Honesty and Reality that is been artificially supported by the outdated Laws had to be CHANGED so that the Law ad Order reflects the new Landscape that have evolved from the Days of ‘The Raj’… The Satyameva Jayate is part of the Justice that has keep in pace with the changing Society - The 85% Citizens in Majority of The Population have finally been allowed to be heard - The Governance and the Administration of the Law needed the changes… The clear-cut process will improve the Justice System ad reflect the needs of The Society that has evolved from the early days of the release from the British Rules and Laws… Satyameva Jayate

  • @bpramakrishnaramu8730
    @bpramakrishnaramu8730 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    these feminists media, will never talk about bns section 69, whhich is the most dangerous law for men and is not gender neutral.

  • @rakeshgaru1598
    @rakeshgaru1598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Silence on the draconian section 69...which criminalises only men breaking up...makes this video as useless as the laws

  • @VishalIthikkatt
    @VishalIthikkatt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An excellent decition no more scandals in judiciary. Favouring public not filling the pocket of judges and lawyers

  • @mohdzayan7958
    @mohdzayan7958 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best explanation

  • @virinderdogra6086
    @virinderdogra6086 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Why so much in hurry?

    • @sr99305
      @sr99305 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sir these laws are from 1860 + and amended since then, so this is a requirement which shoukd have been done earlier.

  • @heavenlyxtacy
    @heavenlyxtacy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Are these laws applicable to the rich or only the poor and middle class?

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      First read

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Law is for everyone

    • @heavenlyxtacy
      @heavenlyxtacy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChandranPrema123 is it really, one minor hit 2 people with a car and ki**** them, he was told to write essay, given pizza by police and was allowed to go home. Can you do that.

    • @sunnymeee
      @sunnymeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@heavenlyxtacyif you are rich you can get away with any law so it's mostly for middle and lower middle class people

    • @heavenlyxtacy
      @heavenlyxtacy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@phoqusing law is actually a joke in India, you have money you can do anything.

  • @pop_princeofpour8525
    @pop_princeofpour8525 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Really yr very good law ❤

  • @vairavasundaramsundaram2660
    @vairavasundaramsundaram2660 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BNSS is replacing Act 3 of 1974 and not Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898

  • @ravigk7974
    @ravigk7974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    draconian laws to suit political agenda of ruling party to suppress voices of opposition. Need public debate and consensus for democratic laws.

  • @shivkumarmohite4672
    @shivkumarmohite4672 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Modi government is functioning as it did for the past ten years and continuing after the elections. No change.

  • @myanthungezung2970
    @myanthungezung2970 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Some of the sections are absolutely draconian. If such huge exercise are being carried out in the Parliament all the lawmakers must be present in both the houses and must be debated extensively.

  • @melwynpereira6605
    @melwynpereira6605 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Modi never thought he would loose majority in parliament hence these laws were ramped through Loksabha and anyone opposing were ousted from parliament in the 17th Loksabha. Today these laws are on the verge of being passed without the necessary process of implementation thus giving police greater powers. In short Modi thought of a 3rd term with absolute majority but with NDA1 and a stronger opposition his dreams of Autocracy seems to have taken a back seat.

  • @Anna_Swamy_Nageshwar
    @Anna_Swamy_Nageshwar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Increasing punishment signalsl that the punishments are not working, the problem we have is not with quantity of punishments but catching the criminals. How many people are caught in mob lynching and how many are convicted. The function of laws depends on what kind of social norms and politics we have.

  • @predictor7708
    @predictor7708 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    #JusticeforBSNL

  • @Sheela9999
    @Sheela9999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    when even elected mp`s don`t get a chance to discuss and debate the bills, what chance do activists and other stakeholders that work with the people every day standing up against police states , have?? ALL SUCH CHANGES IN LAW SHOULD BE DEBATED IN PARLIAMENT ONLY ---THIS IS NOT JUNGLE RAJ WHERE POLICE WILL BE GIVEN AMPLE POWERS TO ARREST EXCEPT IN AREAS OF NATIONAL INTEREST & TERRORISM.

  • @gurbachansingh9799
    @gurbachansingh9799 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why to pass new criminal laws. The existing laws can be amended, added and deleted as per the new requirements.

  • @govindss27
    @govindss27 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Scary, opposition must do everything to get the draconian aspects of the three bills removed

  • @excelsior1979
    @excelsior1979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's Saakshya Samhita....

  • @PremdasDutta-iw7nw
    @PremdasDutta-iw7nw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These so called criminal law will have the same fate like msp bill.just wait and watch for the further embaracement of modi.

  • @psquare2260
    @psquare2260 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Really bad reporting. Main information is buried somewhere in the middle of video.

    • @karatekid7640
      @karatekid7640 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Arundhati Roy ki copy...

  • @sanatkumardave9280
    @sanatkumardave9280 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THNX@mADAM FOR INDETAIL UNDERSTANDING US THREE NEW LAWS TO COME IN EFFECT FROM 1ST JULY 2024....Y D KARAN THAPER ALSO HAVE HAD IN DETAIL DISCUSSION WITH S/C ADVOCATE INDRA JAYSINGH ......WE CAN U/S NOW.....JSK SD USA

  • @abhisheksoan880
    @abhisheksoan880 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CrPC 1973 ..

  • @shivamkadam8335
    @shivamkadam8335 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Print is cryin😂😂

  • @sheebadivakaran5416
    @sheebadivakaran5416 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about the ministers who bribe and flourish during and alcohol business and killing millions of children and destroying those families?
    Who is going to get punish these people and what is the punishment going to be?
    We need immediate action on these than that is placed on effect.
    Selling drugs and killing people is also a crime. Any thoughts?

  • @lincolnmawsor8222
    @lincolnmawsor8222 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    besides the laws, bjp is now enforcing hindi language on every tribes and community.. those old names were much easier and proper to say but now we have to came up with the language we don't like.....

  • @sunderkunchithapatham5248
    @sunderkunchithapatham5248 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will the new laws Benny any positive impact or is it all only negative?

  • @myanthungezung2970
    @myanthungezung2970 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Not only old laws must change but qualifications and criteria of law makers must also change, as law making in modern times has becomes very challenging that we need a highly educated lawmakers to make new laws that is relevant to our needs and times. It is very discouraging and frustrating to see we have some sizeable number of lawmakers who were either under matriculate or a school dropouts who becomes a big liability to the country. High time this things are being discuss widely.

    • @michellesdairies8411
      @michellesdairies8411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They also should have a degree of some sort.

    • @elliven17
      @elliven17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Criminals should not be allowed in the process of law making.

    • @TreeShakura
      @TreeShakura 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂

  • @belezadsouza1744
    @belezadsouza1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    R these laws applicable to government officials n personnel n MP PM N MMS N OTHER HIGH OFFICIALS or only to public

  • @SujoyGhosh-td5yo
    @SujoyGhosh-td5yo 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🙏

  • @sr99305
    @sr99305 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Firdt trll people what they are rsthervthsn dtart eith the controverdies. All such changes will hsve diverse opinions. Let us initiate and modify to help all impacted. We all should support and make positive changes.

  • @adithyahk
    @adithyahk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Someone accused of violence , gujrat killings , tampering with evidences like haren pandya murder and shohrabuddin fake encounters, master minding and evading law through corruption who was acquitted because of lack of evidence is coming up with evidence act and penal and criminal procedure codes. Hey ram hey bharat mata

  • @Ajay_Singhhh
    @Ajay_Singhhh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Code of criminal procedure act is of 1973 not 1898! Correction 😀

  • @samsingh43
    @samsingh43 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    adultery must be crime .Why it's not being so??

  • @Sheela9999
    @Sheela9999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NOW OPPOSITION IS STRONG --IT WILL NOT BE CAKE WALK FOR GOVT.

  • @samnote2459
    @samnote2459 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We need educated journalists not illiterate ones who don't know the difference in the old and new sedition related laws:
    The old laws refer to the government
    The new ones refer to the country

  • @hopgkhams6399
    @hopgkhams6399 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These laws dont apply to BJP.

  • @belezadsouza1744
    @belezadsouza1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make strick laws for corruption n other crimes committed by government personnel exclusively 😂😅 thank u God Bless ❤

  • @RwikKumarDutta
    @RwikKumarDutta 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So sad to see this being done in such a haphazard way ... The overarching nature of police in the country seems to increase rather than decrease

  • @suryaveluthurla
    @suryaveluthurla 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The current law and order itself sucks!!! :) so why not a new law and order by our own! which may not be strong but i'm sure that get better over the time.

  • @PremdasDutta-iw7nw
    @PremdasDutta-iw7nw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can this new laws punish such couples of hindi urdu speakers having two children and lessen population growth among hindi and urdu speakers.

    • @adithyahk
      @adithyahk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hate mongering is an offence too

  • @Ska_ralte
    @Ska_ralte 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How does Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam becomes BSB, not BSA??

  • @maneeshbhardwaj1089
    @maneeshbhardwaj1089 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks. Keep covering more on this important topic. If possible, also juxtapose with ability / intent / focus of the Government to effectively implement its policies.. lot of policies get made, not thought through properly and on top of that only to be shoddily implemented or simply abandoned.. NEP is just a recent example.. btw, will it be safe doing such programs after July 1st ?

  • @manojdivatia
    @manojdivatia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China uses AI in judiciary which in my opinion is a great initiative as we human do run high on emotions and rational intelligence goes low. many videos of various courts do give to me that judges many time do loose temper / speak loudly etc and then throw a decisopn / judgement.

    • @elliven17
      @elliven17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also corruption and favouritism.

  • @Re-vt6rq
    @Re-vt6rq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why can't say the English phrase of the law? This is English clip right?
    Misinfo by print! Our laws has not evolved un India! Why continue British Era laws? Opposition opposed almost every parlimentary proceedings!
    What is the content? Instead Why talk about negative image?

  • @AnushaLakshmi-r2d
    @AnushaLakshmi-r2d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    New Criminal Acts 2023: th-cam.com/play/PLGVC8NNwDBjbj4r4kibUkSjDaxACZ7OKr.html

  • @SmileHappyly
    @SmileHappyly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are British colonial laws not draconian ? Why not highlighting any positive aspects? Being critical is good, but being neutral is more important!

    • @HolkhomangHaokip-q1r
      @HolkhomangHaokip-q1r 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why British laws are draconian, i can't understand, pse explain

    • @SmileHappyly
      @SmileHappyly 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HolkhomangHaokip-q1r Please search for Sedition law

    • @SmileHappyly
      @SmileHappyly 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HolkhomangHaokip-q1r One example, Please do a search for Sedition law in India. If not Draconian, you may suggest a better term to describe the Sedition law...

  • @nilanjanpramanik3587
    @nilanjanpramanik3587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bns 69 non bailable offence...holy shit..man you are gone

  • @MoonMoon-000
    @MoonMoon-000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The new criminal laws are indianised or hindinised by wording it in hindi language, that is भारतीय न्याय संहिता and so on, if so, why are you using English alphabets to say it's short form, that is BNS for भारतीय न्याय संहिता... Instead you should have said "भा न्य सा" for BNS and so on....

    • @elliven17
      @elliven17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right. They are unable to decide which way to go 😂

  • @whatzzzup5974
    @whatzzzup5974 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its not bharyathiya.. Its Bharatiya .. your pronunciation is wrong..

  • @northern_light
    @northern_light 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is what happens when WhatsApp University scholars become lawmakers! Giving immense power to the pak army by its jinnah University scholars resulted in roti kapda makan situation in Pakistan

    • @Intellect_007
      @Intellect_007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tu phele school ki parai karle fir baat kar

    • @northern_light
      @northern_light 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Intellect_007 Abe 'intellect' i have come far away from so-called lawmakers and you as well!! Don't you see the apron in my dp, it's not fraudulently obtained like your masters, it's hard earned. Tu apna rasta nap,waise bawasir disease nehi,bas veins ka swelling hai.aja surgery krwa deta hu

    • @Intellect_007
      @Intellect_007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@northern_light aabe chomu I pay taxes in 7 digits more than you can imagine in your lifetime. You guys are actually graduated from Dhruv Rathee school of WhatsApp Jakar phele par inflation, budget expenditure, internal external debt , fiscal health kya hota hai. Agar samjha aaega to shayad akal aaigi ki Yeh Khata Khat vale kitne bare vale gadhe hai ki agar power Me aae to desh ko Doba denge

    • @howdoifindaname2743
      @howdoifindaname2743 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Intellect_007 what are you even talking about lmao? This video is about the penal laws. Kahi se bhi taxes aur inflation ke bare mein kuch bhi bhok diya to tum smart ho aisa samajh le kya?? Actual clown comment xD

    • @Intellect_007
      @Intellect_007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@howdoifindaname2743 the above guys is taking about Roti Kapra makan situation just like Pakistan. Moreover he is taking about he came over far away. Hence the reply. Baki Teri kyu gand jal rahi hai 😂😂

  • @KKJain-v1q
    @KKJain-v1q 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Replacing black with grey?
    Atleast brown would have been better'

  • @kallachi729
    @kallachi729 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Stake holders must be surely criminals..haha

  • @predictor7708
    @predictor7708 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    #andrewtate

  • @iki740
    @iki740 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh boy, next few years are gonna be so fuuuunn😂

  • @mrajiv6946
    @mrajiv6946 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BNSS will replace CrPC, 1973 not the Act of 1898

  • @nehadhuri248
    @nehadhuri248 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electronic devices and online communication too??? 🤯🤯🤯 Ofcourse this would be infringement of privacy

    • @nv9991
      @nv9991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What % of communication today is in Electronic devices and online communication?

    • @Zambia974
      @Zambia974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      less 🦥 lazybones bloodsucker Jai Bharat

    • @shivamkadam8335
      @shivamkadam8335 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If your are doing crime then your are criminal and using your digital signature to address your offence is rational and just.

  • @khanlatifahmed
    @khanlatifahmed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Time will come,when only police will rule the Nation. More scope of IPS now rather than IAS.

  • @SS-yx2qk
    @SS-yx2qk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Olee lee 😂😂😂😂

  • @rajendraprasadkudiyal2347
    @rajendraprasadkudiyal2347 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ADHBHUT PRINTWA ANTIMODIHAWA KIDAR GAYA THIS IS THE HINGLISH MAHATWA PRUNA KAGZEE CHANAKYA THE GREAT PRETTY MUCH SO MUCH TO MUCH DANDA KANOON THIS IS THE BLIND DANDA LAW YE DANDA KANOON HAI SOCHIT VANCHIT DALIT OBC EBC AADEWASEE MYSULIM REDE PATREE NAYAY FAIL FLY SO SAD MT EVEREST VAKIL KA KYA HOOGA WAT ABOUT BERKELEY LLBLLM CURRYCULAM LAW MASTER CONFUSED NOT APPLICABLE TO LONDON FLY CARPET CHRONY CAPITALISM OLIGO JAI HO SEWADHAR

    • @Atheist-Libertarian
      @Atheist-Libertarian 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Arre lower case me likho,
      Ye upper case me padha nahi jaa raha

  • @Zambia974
    @Zambia974 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    public services 🐕‍🦺

  • @abdulvzm3771
    @abdulvzm3771 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Madam your hair whitening fast

    • @belezadsouza1744
      @belezadsouza1744 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂😂 is there a law in favor of it or against 😂😂😂😂😅