Coriolis Effect

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 167

  • @ericksonlm
    @ericksonlm 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    "You've gotta be the wind". Came here for science, left with a zen lesson. Very good!

  • @pdutube
    @pdutube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish I could upvote this a million times. I've watched several videos on Coriolis and they only mention low pressure systems, nothing about the highs. It makes so much more sense when taking the perspective of wind direction into account! Thank you!

  • @Seckybones
    @Seckybones 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    People, people this is a science teacher just putting online notes up for his students. No need to try and prove him wrong or tell him he is wrong. He's just doing his job and spreading his knowledge. :)

  • @AyushmanSaini
    @AyushmanSaini 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderfully explained. Very lucid. Thanks for putting this up!

  • @fakherhalim
    @fakherhalim 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Summary:
    1. Earth's (eastward) velocity is highest at equator (zero at axis/poles).
    2. Things (e.g. wind) move from high to low pressure. They tend to retain their velocity (highest eastward near equator).
    That explains all curves/spinnings in this beautiful video,

  • @angelalauber6246
    @angelalauber6246 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped me immensely for retaking a quiz in my science class. Thank you for helping me understand the coriolis effect.

  • @TheBigFella
    @TheBigFella 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job😀👍 very clear. Thank you very much for taking the time to do this

  • @JustinH73
    @JustinH73 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    explanation on Jupiter just blew my mind. Thank you so much for the video sir.

  • @montydaniels1054
    @montydaniels1054 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll comment twice but to Blakefor8, he's talking about trying to hover over one spot, where as in the Coriolis Effect, they're talking about objects that are moving while the earth rotates. So to hover, the pilot is keeping the helicopter in the same location, right or wrong?. Also one more thing to remember is, the earth is rotating at 15 degrees per hour, so the N & S Poles would be different than the equator would be. Not to confuse people but that is why Pilots have adjustments that need to be in account when they are flying in certain directions for longer periods of time. They can't fly straight, they have to have a flight angle.

  • @RImAPhan
    @RImAPhan 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Got an Ecology test tomorrow and you've been a great help. :D

  • @torahaaland916
    @torahaaland916 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much, I finally understand the whole concept of the Equatic low pressure winds!!!

  • @prashantkumar6686
    @prashantkumar6686 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect lesson to clear the directional doubts.

  • @SpartanEarthScience
    @SpartanEarthScience  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The diagram is correct. The winds in the Southern Hemisphere will curve to the left, while North of the Equator the winds will curve to the right. As these winds meet near the Equator they will be blowing in the same direction. This area is known as the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone or ITCZ.

  • @brianbarnard5569
    @brianbarnard5569 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A common thought, but remember that both the helicopter and balloon are controlled by the atmosphere which is also rotating. A helicopter pilot will also use the Earth as a reference in flight. It is not just the solid portion of the Earth that is spinning; the at atmosphere and oceans also move. Much of the circulation of the atmosphere and oceans is caused by the Earth's rotation.

    • @truenorthpublisher682
      @truenorthpublisher682 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is wrong. The earth does not spin, it is stationary.

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      True North Publisher Yes. And don't forget about the part where we didn't land on the Moon.

  • @KrazyKrzysztof
    @KrazyKrzysztof 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What an amazing video. This is my first year teaching ES. This video answered all my points of confusion in just a few minutes.

    • @thetrayne9247
      @thetrayne9247 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Coriolis is a lie, easily disproven by a gyro. Your confusion was you didn't think the lie was correct, and rightly so. Do some more research on gyroscopes and what they can prove, you will be surprised! No one uses it on long range shots either. ITS A LIE.

  • @kenlee5509
    @kenlee5509 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is why Dyson spheres would tear themselves apart. Which is what made Larry Nivin Write Ringworld the way he did, and why HALO happens on a ringworld and not inside a Dyson Sphere. I think a series of rings, almost a ball, could work well too.

  • @edemayitey3038
    @edemayitey3038 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    my confusion has be cleared. tanx alot

  • @alectricfoxx
    @alectricfoxx 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    @SpartanEarthScience , Thisis a fine explanation of what Mr. Coriolis was thinking..I love my Celestron telescope , and have 'thrown~out' so many bologna-ass 'theories" some folks come up with trying to understand and explain to someone else how the mechanics of this actually affects things. I've had the Telescopic Instrument from when I spent the $1200.00 for the thing back in 1994. Keeping it real. The planet Jupiter is the perfect example of the Coriolis Effect. Our planet Earth is the example we all have to contend with.Thank-you for this video :)-Foxx. . =^.^=

  • @kenbtc6824
    @kenbtc6824 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Left or right? Rather use clockwise or counter clockwise. This way you don't have to consider "looking from the direction of the wind", or turn things upside down to see it....

    • @MikeGreenwood51
      @MikeGreenwood51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or west if the wind is not rotating.

  • @WrightReactions
    @WrightReactions 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for these videos. I do not know where in new york you are from, but you certainly have helped me to further my understanding for earth science and i am doing better on practice tests.

  • @radhashyammuduli1632
    @radhashyammuduli1632 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Concept of Coriolis effect is a very good idea but everything in nature do not occur as per this effect. Physical features of practical earth affects flow pattern of air and water on global ocean & atmosphere.

    • @brianbarnard5569
      @brianbarnard5569 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, yes. I agree. The Coriolis effect is not the only cause of processes in our oceans and atmosphere. But it does cause some major characteristics of our weather and ocean circulation.

  • @lilyliang1759
    @lilyliang1759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this was really helpful thank you sooo much!!!

  • @emmaboey6021
    @emmaboey6021 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for your crystal clear explanation

  • @rustamjamatia6201
    @rustamjamatia6201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation Sir. Thank you🙏🙏🙏

  • @justfindhim
    @justfindhim 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Coriolis effect is only due to the latitudes, isn't? So if one were to bomb a city on equator from another on equator, one need consider only the actually distance over land. Is it so?

  • @auntiechrist4397
    @auntiechrist4397 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, so Earth's a sphere? 🤔..........Interesting........... This has been quite informative for me! Congratulations!

  • @dhawalkumar3321
    @dhawalkumar3321 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Grt.
    The funda that you are the wind is amazing

  • @andykiwan3151
    @andykiwan3151 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. That was very good explanation.

  • @greatdragonofra
    @greatdragonofra 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explenation, im refreshing my ATPL knowledge and this is a great help! I do have a question though, do you have a video about the ITCZ? I might have missed it on your channel, but you have a great way of explaining!

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Radj Achaiber sing
      I don't have any other videos. Maybe in the future. Sorry

  • @amanuelwoldeab3985
    @amanuelwoldeab3985 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    If pressure at 30 degree north is lower than that at 60 degree N then how come the wind blows away from the 30 degree N to 60 degree N. Cause this seems to contradict with the fact that the wind blows from the 30 degree N ( Higher pressure) towards the equator ( lower pressure)

    • @fakherhalim
      @fakherhalim 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right. All objects move from higher to lower pressure. 60 degree N wind, moving towards equator will have lower original eastward component and move towards west while approaching lower latitudes.
      I find right and left definition (in place of east and west) very confusing!

  • @dalinyso4448
    @dalinyso4448 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So meaning the earth rotation causes the coriolis effect and the coriolis effect causes the global wind to move in a curve way??

  • @alancheng008
    @alancheng008 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    explained very clearly thanks!

  • @rainbirdp
    @rainbirdp 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Rather than say the wind is curving to the right or left, why not just say that the wind curves either in the direction of the spin of the earth (eastward) or opposite the direction of the spin of the earth (westward). Left or right is relative to your perspective, but the spins of the earth is a constant. Also, how is it that the Coriolis effect causes wind to curve westward (clockwise) in the tropical storm zone of the N. Hemisphere, yet hurricanes spin counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere.

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Douglas,
      Great questions. Using left or right is easier for my high school students to use so they don't have to think of the added information about which way the Earth is spinning. It also doesn't work, using the "spin of the Earth" method. Imagine air flowing South in the Northern Hemisphere; it will appear to curve to the West (opposite the Earth's rotation) but air traveling North will appear to curve to the East (with the Earth's rotation). Right or left are relative to your position, so I try to emphasize that; it is a very important point.
      To answer your question about hurricane (and other low pressure systems) rotation see th-cam.com/video/Un2bMX2RnXE/w-d-xo.html

    • @rainbirdp
      @rainbirdp 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SpartanEarthScience But the constant in wind direction is the spin of the earth whether the air is flowing North or South and curves to the east or west. East and West are actually the same as "with spin" or "opposite spin" of earth. As you point out, air flowing North appears to curve Eastward (toward spin of the earth) and air flowing southward in N. Hemisphere, appears to spin Westward or opposite spin of the earth. Both of these effects are due to Coriolis effect. When air (or any object) flows from a higher speed latitude to a lower speed latitude, the air will appear to flow with the spin of the earth. If air flows from a lower speed latitude to a higher speed latitude, the air will appear to flow opposite the spin of the earth. That general principle will work in the Northern or Southern Hemisphere.

    • @haroldwestrich3312
      @haroldwestrich3312 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately, Spartanearthscience, Has just outlined the problem with our education system. THERE is not enough time, with so few teachers, to fully explain complex thought problems; THEREFORE we must take shortcuts just to get the future factory workers to PASS the class so that the teachers and school systems can maintain their FUNDING ...... because life is all about the money now isn't it !?!?!? WE CAN"T AFFORD To take time truly helping these kids understand that angular momentum and conservation of energy are some of the OTHER concepts that will help to clarify the Coriolis effect. Now instead of just complaining I will suggest showing slow motion videos of Skaters doing spins with arms out and then pulling the arms in to speed up, If your School has a swimming pool you can get inner tubes for the students to lay across..... spin them a little then tell them to pull their arms and legs in - it will be an obvious and very personal, REAL, physical ExPERIENCE of the Coriolis effect.

    • @riyabatra7767
      @riyabatra7767 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why not say clockwise or anticlockwise?

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    And when do you give the physical explanation?

  • @lenonsilva3907
    @lenonsilva3907 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is the south pole(WET SUF) curved to the left?

  • @BrianStephenAquinoDomingo
    @BrianStephenAquinoDomingo 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! ECOLOGY Test tomorrow :)

  • @waltersim
    @waltersim 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation!!thanks a lot!!

  • @真探-o6i
    @真探-o6i ปีที่แล้ว

    Question :how do you explain when river or air flow from west to the east ?

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  ปีที่แล้ว

      Rivers flow downhill and are not affected by the Earth’s rotation.
      Air moves (wind) from areas of higher air pressure to areas of lower air pressure.

    • @真探-o6i
      @真探-o6i ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SpartanEarthScience I mean, moving from east to west can also have coriolis force phenomenon, but it's not explained by this model, objects moving at the same latitude are similar as moving in a circle, but why there are coriolis force phenomenon, I think you have to think about gravity. Gravity is a very important factor, but it is ignored by many people, I think they are wrong, can only explain formally, not fully understood, coriolis force is not equal to geostrophic force.

    • @真探-o6i
      @真探-o6i ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SpartanEarthScience I have a model to think about it. Imagine a ball of yarn that diverges in the center. When it spins fast enough, the ball becomes flat, simulating the motion of a river or atmosphere on its surface. Coriolis can only explain part of it.The binding force from the center is deflecting the motion.

  • @doubleveggiedoublefun3161
    @doubleveggiedoublefun3161 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks man sweet and simple

  • @AidanofVT
    @AidanofVT 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nope, still don't get it. I've been trying to understand this for half an hour.

  • @dhawalkumar3321
    @dhawalkumar3321 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @Hey_kaarthii
    @Hey_kaarthii 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video tnx

  • @SpartanEarthScience
    @SpartanEarthScience  11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Agreed

  • @sandhradeeps7274
    @sandhradeeps7274 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanqqqq so muchch

  • @Sid-su8kz
    @Sid-su8kz 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    SpartanEarthScience
    suggestion : gather your thoughts and then do it , you have jupiter but your mercury keeps trying to show he is citius altius fortius , at getting to the conclusion , like a zealous but young genius . and dont you dare hate on me , i really wish well...

  • @sangwaninbox
    @sangwaninbox 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally westerlies paradox makes sense,,,thank you

  • @Grimmy_Grimes
    @Grimmy_Grimes 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NOW I GET IT!!!!11one

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    incomplete explanation

  • @nickfan7948
    @nickfan7948 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Curve to right! Curve to left! Everybody move your air! Blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow blow...

  • @khriezzzz6170
    @khriezzzz6170 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    u better used clock wise and anti clock wise so that u won't be needing to explain again and again..

  • @chandankumar-sc8nv
    @chandankumar-sc8nv 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    in easy way

  • @sunflowerbaby6926
    @sunflowerbaby6926 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️❤️

  • @johnnycarrion4754
    @johnnycarrion4754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dont thikn so coriollis is not wins

  • @ramyarao683
    @ramyarao683 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't Un

  • @MikeGreenwood51
    @MikeGreenwood51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gaspard Gustave de Coriolis (Pubished observation 1835).

  • @winarttee
    @winarttee 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coriolis Effect who is responsible for this? That's is why we cant solve the cyclone problem.

  • @ThangHuynh10
    @ThangHuynh10 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so wrong lol

  • @thetrayne9247
    @thetrayne9247 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coriolis is a lie, easily disproven by a simple gyro.

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Feel free to post your video explanation here.

    • @thetrayne9247
      @thetrayne9247 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SpartanEarthScience any gyro proves no earth motion and no globe. sheesh, get a cell.

  • @diggLincoln
    @diggLincoln 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    🐑🐑🐑🐑

  • @HesselWorst
    @HesselWorst 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Coriolis effect is very selective. It doesn't apply to airplanes. Oh yeah, and when a sniper shoots across the equator, the Coriolis effect is negligible. By the way, earth is flat and does
    not move.

  • @joshuagrunlund4938
    @joshuagrunlund4938 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bahahaha, who comes up with this nonsense. I guess pitchers must pay attention which direction theyre facing. With this new information i cant wait to see how my golf game improves. lol Im only going to go bowling in alleys that face north so i can get more hook. Bahahahaha.

    • @F.O.R.
      @F.O.R. 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      for golf and baseball the effect is NOT observable.

    • @daeyounglim4524
      @daeyounglim4524 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The travel distance must be long enough to observe this Coriolis effect.... It doesn’t happen at a micro level

  • @ratumelimatanatoto2488
    @ratumelimatanatoto2488 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    awesome vid on the coriolis effect...able to understand the coriolis effect,which Im learning in Uni..

  • @doubleveggiedoublefun3161
    @doubleveggiedoublefun3161 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks man sweet and simple

  • @adrian-mq9vj
    @adrian-mq9vj 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like this video a lot, but I DO NOT LIKE MY SCIENCE ASSIGNMENT IN SCHOOL

  • @Anuragkumar-lu7uz
    @Anuragkumar-lu7uz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love u

  • @fabioceresani4837
    @fabioceresani4837 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    a genius is whom is able to explain hard concept in a very easy way. u'r a genius tks indeed :-)

  • @alicema3851
    @alicema3851 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is the wind APPEAR to be moving to a certain direction when it is? You are confusing me!!

  • @winarttee
    @winarttee 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    doppler radars and sattelites their use are just to predict the directions but not to avoid the formation of cyclones

  • @outerworld5409
    @outerworld5409 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I have no confusion of that right and left

  • @lilithemerson2263
    @lilithemerson2263 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have to do some stupid summaries on this

  • @terra2805
    @terra2805 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    ....back up YOUR ridiculous theories! If anyone would like to see just how crazy and ridiculous some of these people are, please check out a personal favourite of mine, Lord Steven Christ, and make your own mind up. I guarantee it will give you a good laugh too! check it out, you'll be glad you did, it's very enlightening from a psychological study point of view! Lol :o)

  • @neha588
    @neha588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you soooooo much sir...🤎

  • @thorpt211
    @thorpt211 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for posting the video but could you tell me why the winds are flowing the same direction (at 4:20) aren't they supposed to go in the opposite direction? Thanks :)

  • @brandonbaker7150
    @brandonbaker7150 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video SpartanEarthSccience very informative and put simply, helped me to easaly understan.

  • @architadash7991
    @architadash7991 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was indeed so helpful to me. Thank you :)

  • @dougtom5824
    @dougtom5824 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Newton's 1st law says an object in motion stays in motion, so just saying that objects curve because the earth is spinning is inaccurate because the earth spins everywhere so it would seem to cancel out in your force equation. However, the precise way to convey the effect it is that the earth spins at different velocities depending on an observer's relation to the poles. The velocity vector of an object at the equator is greater than an object at the poles. An object like a bullet retains the velocity vector from its origin as it moves through space, and since the origin velocity vector is different than its destination velocity vector (either northward/southward trajectory), it curves from the observer's perspective.

    • @brianbarnard690
      @brianbarnard690 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your first point is accurate; the Coriolis effect is an _apparent_ curve. I'm confused about what is canceling out and what force equation you are referring to. There is no need to bring up velocity vectors, either original or the destination to explain the Coriolis effect.

  • @briansummers6074
    @briansummers6074 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So wind will only go in one direction for where you live. Wind comes from any direction from my experience.

  • @Erika70079
    @Erika70079 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! After watching many videos I found this one helped the most, especially with the wind belts and the pressures they tend to have.

  • @EidangerFootballClub
    @EidangerFootballClub 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video. Easy explained and good examples. Thanks a lot.

  • @binayadav9462
    @binayadav9462 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @cynthiaVEVO
    @cynthiaVEVO 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    A much better explanation than my teachers, thank you!

  • @arushi8345
    @arushi8345 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a damn good teacher.
    Can you explain in a video lecture about Jet Streams and the Indian Monsoon?How does the Anticyclonic Tibetan Plateau created monsoonal condtions, and Why do jet streams move the way they move? Pretty pleeease???

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...and you're a damn good person.
      Sorry. I don't have any videos on the Jet Stream; and no plans:(

    • @arushi8345
      @arushi8345 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +SpartanEarthScience thanks for the reply.
      I found a good lecture on the Jet Streams and the Indian, west Asian and Australian south west monsoon. very well explained.
      thermal induction is easy, but Jet Streams were a tough game till now.
      all in all, hats off to TH-cam educators :-)

  • @butterjang
    @butterjang 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i finally get it, after three years. THANK YOU.

  • @himanshudutta7462
    @himanshudutta7462 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great work , thanks buddy !!

  • @ahpongler
    @ahpongler 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot, great supplement for my study!

  • @Rockkzzzz
    @Rockkzzzz 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clearly explained.

  • @olivertostado9294
    @olivertostado9294 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot this helped

  • @meganadhans6454
    @meganadhans6454 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    superb I love it

  • @monilsharma7259
    @monilsharma7259 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice and simple

  • @luludiamant
    @luludiamant 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! O.O

  • @tacticalant3841
    @tacticalant3841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So your saying the law of entropy is overridden by an “apparent deviation”, aka a “not actual deviation”?

    • @SpartanEarthScience
      @SpartanEarthScience  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. I'm not saying that at all. Not sure where you got that from. Entropy, thermodynamics; not mentioned in this video.

    • @tacticalant3841
      @tacticalant3841 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      SpartanEarthScience - so the term “entropy” was no used, but you discuss the movement of high pressure moving to low pressure. That is entropy, is it not?