MIP 3.1 & 3.2: As-Planned vs As-Built Delay Analysis Method
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2023
- In this video, I explain the following delay analysis methods in accordance with the AACEI RP 29R-03:
MIP 3.1: As-Planned vs As-Built, Observational, Single Base, Static, Gross
MIP 3.2: As-Planned vs As-Built, Observational, Multiple base, Static, Periodic.
➡️ What will you learn?
✅ The Source Validation Protocols (SVPs) and the guidelines of both methods.
✅ How to perform the analysis STEP-BY-STEP.
✅ The advantages, disadvantages, uses and limitations of these methods. - บันเทิง
It's a great job, only if you use longest path instead of critical path. The project has alot of critical paths
that great Osam thanks
You're welcome. Glad you found this helpful!
Hello Sir,
Hope you'd be doing well. I have a question regarding 'Planning Engineering' career. Mostly engineers use Primavera P6 for project controlling. What if its 'MS Project'? Will it provide the same results? Is it effective just like P6 in learning and becoming as a 'Planning Engineer'?
Sometimes the requirements are stated in the contract or requested by the Client. But if I have to choose, I will go for P6 because it is more robust in my opinion.
@@osamasaad428 thank you so much sir for guiding me
Where can we find MIP 3.7?
Mean TIA
There is no tutorial about it@@khankhankkkkkkkkkkkk