MIP 3.1 & 3.2: As-Planned vs As-Built Delay Analysis Method

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @fatheyaabdalrahman8343
    @fatheyaabdalrahman8343 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's a great job, only if you use longest path instead of critical path. The project has alot of critical paths

  • @Vivek-wo6ws
    @Vivek-wo6ws หลายเดือนก่อน

    20:57 in this method do we need to update the schedule with all recent updates are need to update until the dd1 and remaining need not to update ?

  • @binuchellam2741
    @binuchellam2741 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, I would like do Delay analysis for the completed project, could you please advice the method to proceed Delay analysis

  • @bilalqasmi9907
    @bilalqasmi9907 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Sir,
    Hope you'd be doing well. I have a question regarding 'Planning Engineering' career. Mostly engineers use Primavera P6 for project controlling. What if its 'MS Project'? Will it provide the same results? Is it effective just like P6 in learning and becoming as a 'Planning Engineer'?

    • @osamasaad428
      @osamasaad428  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sometimes the requirements are stated in the contract or requested by the Client. But if I have to choose, I will go for P6 because it is more robust in my opinion.

    • @bilalqasmi9907
      @bilalqasmi9907 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@osamasaad428 thank you so much sir for guiding me

  • @walidkhlil2872
    @walidkhlil2872 ปีที่แล้ว

    that great Osam thanks

    • @osamasaad428
      @osamasaad428  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome. Glad you found this helpful!

  • @khankhankkkkkkkkkkkk
    @khankhankkkkkkkkkkkk ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can we find MIP 3.7?