The female captain was the widow of another Yeti Airlines Captain who died in a crash in 2008. She used the insurance money to begin flight training. They’d had one child - a daughter. RIP
🥺😪 She also has a son from her second marriage. I do not know if others believe in destiny, kismet or not but many of us desi (South Asian people) do. May both their souls have peace and the daughter (now in her twenties) and her young son grow up with mental strength and capabilities to do whatever right things they aspires to do. @@kcindc5539
Thank you for the matured approach in presenting this as series of systemic flaws and going beyond the easy route of just pinning it down to the crew. And the detailed notes and the download links are appreciated too. This was close to us and we hoped to see more such documentaries soon. You are helping bring osure for many who lost neardear ones and/or followed this tragic incident closely.
Why does the plane even permit the propellers to be feathered when the plane is mid air and power is applied? It should have given at least a warning under these conditions!
Maybe a configuration alert at least but it could be done if needed per a checklist. Most systems I think are designed to be isolated and not assume things. And if there is a valid reason to do this, they dont want people to become too used to "false alarms".
They have to be able to be feathered in flight as in the event of an engine problem you have to quickly feather the props on the bad engine or the drag will bring down the plane.
Definitely down to the regulators, like you said, but i also think the ATR (and any turboprop for that matter) should have some kind of warning when both propellors are feathered above idle power.
Stellar content! Great illustration and detail. I would change two things though: The pace is too high for such a high volume of information. You need more pauses in narration. Also: cut the annoying woosh-sound-effects. No one needs those. We are all adults after all.
If you can't understand what he says, saying slower won't fix it. Also, he is sumarizing it, its not complex. But he could have used the correct cockpit, that is a King Air 350! lol
Hello @@MrCaiobrz, I do not know about Heinz, but I (who is in mid forties and now permanently back in India) too did find there were lots of technical terms, technical details. And yes, that sometimes (or oftentimes) makes one feel that things can be paced out. May be not as much as Petter's (Mentour Pilot's) videos which go on to 40 minutes too.. but some more time for letting it all sink in. #shrugs or may be I am aging faster than others do!😄 The others who are suggesting that the audio/video can be slowed: it is not THAT pace we meant. Slowing ir down is not from the narration speed point alone. But like how he paused the main story to detour to explaining concepts or adding his own ancillary viewpoints. Obviously even after slowing it, some of us would still miss many of the words or terms used.. as the accent is something which even Google autobots are having difficulty keeping up with. The 'pace' here refers to the narration style. . I personally do not care that much about minute accuracies or deviations in the on-screen graphics as I mostly listen to these like a podcast. (Call me strange but atleast long ones like those of Mentour Pilot.. i sometimes even doze off.. especially if listening to them very late at night,.)
As feathering the propellors in flight clearly presents such a huge risk, you would have thought propellor-driven aircraft like the ATR72 would have a warning chime/light that was triggered if the propellors are feathered when the altitude is above, say, 50ft. Or a display showing the status of the propellors that lights up green when configured 'normally' and red when feathered. Seems odd a pilot can put the plane into a dangerous configuration without a warning that would be simple to build.
Sort of, yes. Authorities determined that the approach to Runway 12 was unsafe. A more standard approach wouldn't have created such a large workload and would have been in a position with greater margins for error. For example, a 30° bank is extreme for a commercial flight.
The female captain was the widow of another Yeti Airlines Captain who died in a crash in 2008. She used the insurance money to begin flight training. They’d had one child - a daughter. RIP
Tragic
@@ellentronicmistress4969 very much so
That’s a devastating fact.
@@rongenise7006 yeah, sadly
🥺😪
She also has a son from her second marriage.
I do not know if others believe in destiny, kismet or not
but many of us desi (South Asian people) do.
May both their souls have peace and the daughter (now in her twenties) and her young son grow up with mental strength and capabilities to do whatever right things they aspires to do.
@@kcindc5539
Thank you for the matured approach in presenting this as series of systemic flaws and going beyond the easy route of just pinning it down to the crew.
And the detailed notes and the download links are appreciated too.
This was close to us and we hoped to see more such documentaries soon.
You are helping bring osure for many who lost neardear ones and/or followed this tragic incident closely.
Why does the plane even permit the propellers to be feathered when the plane is mid air and power is applied?
It should have given at least a warning under these conditions!
Maybe a configuration alert at least but it could be done if needed per a checklist. Most systems I think are designed to be isolated and not assume things. And if there is a valid reason to do this, they dont want people to become too used to "false alarms".
They have to be able to be feathered in flight as in the event of an engine problem you have to quickly feather the props on the bad engine or the drag will bring down the plane.
@@andrewtaylor940 Read the last 4 words of the first sentence...
Definitely down to the regulators, like you said, but i also think the ATR (and any turboprop for that matter) should have some kind of warning when both propellors are feathered above idle power.
Stellar content! Great illustration and detail.
I would change two things though:
The pace is too high for such a high volume of information. You need more pauses in narration.
Also: cut the annoying woosh-sound-effects. No one needs those. We are all adults after all.
If you can't understand what he says, saying slower won't fix it. Also, he is sumarizing it, its not complex.
But he could have used the correct cockpit, that is a King Air 350! lol
You realize you can slow down the video in the TH-cam player settings, right? It's the gear icon near the bottom right of the screen.
Hello @@MrCaiobrz,
I do not know about Heinz, but I (who is in mid forties and now permanently back in India) too did find there were lots of technical terms, technical details.
And yes, that sometimes (or oftentimes) makes one feel that things can be paced out.
May be not as much as Petter's (Mentour Pilot's) videos which go on to 40 minutes too.. but some more time for letting it all sink in.
#shrugs or may be I am aging faster than others do!😄
The others who are suggesting that the audio/video can be slowed: it is not THAT pace we meant.
Slowing ir down is not from the narration speed point alone.
But like how he paused the main story to detour to explaining concepts or adding his own ancillary viewpoints.
Obviously even after slowing it, some of us would still miss many of the words or terms used.. as the accent is something which even Google autobots are having difficulty keeping up with.
The 'pace' here refers to the narration style.
.
I personally do not care that much about minute accuracies or deviations in the on-screen graphics as I mostly listen to these like a podcast. (Call me strange but atleast long ones like those of Mentour Pilot.. i sometimes even doze off.. especially if listening to them very late at night,.)
@@sailaabEver heard of pause?
I like that these videos discuss technical information and don't waste our time. They're well done
Thanks for this great video!
As feathering the propellors in flight clearly presents such a huge risk, you would have thought propellor-driven aircraft like the ATR72 would have a warning chime/light that was triggered if the propellors are feathered when the altitude is above, say, 50ft. Or a display showing the status of the propellors that lights up green when configured 'normally' and red when feathered. Seems odd a pilot can put the plane into a dangerous configuration without a warning that would be simple to build.
Does the airport had any impact on the crash?
Sort of, yes. Authorities determined that the approach to Runway 12 was unsafe. A more standard approach wouldn't have created such a large workload and would have been in a position with greater margins for error. For example, a 30° bank is extreme for a commercial flight.
@@GuyNamedSean thanks for the info
@GuyNamedSean On a somewhat related note, was that the banking angle of the planes that flew into the World Trade Center on 9/11?
You only feather when starting blades. Makes no sense at all.
That looks like a Beechcraft cockpit.
👍
PS some people just like to pick faults
icao - pronounced eye cow
@@Freedom4Ever420 you are correct! I learned something new
That WAS NOT a ATR 72-600 cockpit. That was a Beachcraft.
Er .. King Air 350 cockpit much? XD If you are not going to show the correct thing, don't.
The software does not have all the models of flight deck. :) Maybe Three Greens could switch to FlightGear or something, but the video was well done.
@@thatguyalex2835There IS an ATR mod
First?