I didn't win, but I topped regionals with Fire Kings as well, and still improving the deck. I like his take on the deck, I feel like it's too easy to get dead draws with his deck though.
ive been a fire king player for a couple months now and im so glad it finally topped! His build is quite similar to mine but I dont run the immortal or the blasters. I quite like double rekindling as getting it late game is too good for it to be at one.
Because those decks have a crapton of searching available to them, so the consistancy doesn't drop off that much. Look at the old Gadget decks; they had 44, 45, 46 card main decks without much issue. Heck, even more recently a 50+ card Mermail deck topped.
also, remove the dragons for yubel and yubel terror incarnate and one veiler for sacred phoenix so y have acces to the incarnate-nepthys loop.remove void trap hole,breakthrough and prison for 3 call of the haunted.this card is too op in fire kings when opponent mst in it.finally,he could remove the fiendish for skill drain from the side but im not sure if it works well havent tested it.tell me opinions on my ideas pls so i can improve the deck:-)
why not? everyone is complaining about the dominance of dragons; it's nice to see rogue decks, like frog monarch, agents, and gladiator beast, do great, even if these are just regionals decks. It's good to see variety, especially in this stale dragon-dominated format
@n3nshat11 fire kings arent tier 1.i play them for 6 months and i assure the deck is very op,but its not tier 1(at least not now next format who knows...)about this build...its not bad build,and its kinda budget,althought for more cheap replace wolfbark with another rekindling and boar for flamvell magician.magician has 200 def rekindling target easier late game crimson blader without using up a circle of the fire kings since the circle is the key to the dark hole loop
I really don't see why the ferret. About blaster, pls stop putting ED in every fucking thing guys... he might be playing here more fire monsters then a FK should, but this doesn't make blaster any better, or this strategy viable to me. unless he is tryign to put as much dmg on board as possible against ED. The best trick to this deck after using in regional is 3 scrap-iron scarecrows. 2 monsters over 2700 to kill graunix? rare. it gives you time, sometimes stun your opp completely, and make him waste resources to get over graunix. opp spending resources to field = FK WIN.
Why are you mad? You would be dumb to not include a great card that puts pressure on the board with Garunix. You play darks and lights in your deck? Why not add BLS?
BLS got tremendous effects, and stays as a huge 3k beater. blaster cannot be brought back that much cause the lack of use in monsters, and for having targets for circle. the deck doesn't need 2800 beater to get over things, graunix deals with monsters, that's the all idea behind the card... yes, the deck is slow by having only graunix on field, but you rather have a trap\veiler to defend the monster that make your whole strategy... it's too easy to get over 2700. And if you want something that you can reuse like blaster, go with scrap-iron scarecrow. it would go well with ferret too cause when the opp tries to sit on a boos graunix can't kill, and you can't blow the field that moment, you can just ram into it with ferret and clear the field for graunix.
Ye, The +2800 DMG is great, but won't you rather have defence for graunix, and not giving the opp a nice chance to use TT and the mirrors + being have to pla more fire monsters to make blaster live?
I didn't win, but I topped regionals with Fire Kings as well, and still improving the deck. I like his take on the deck, I feel like it's too easy to get dead draws with his deck though.
ive been a fire king player for a couple months now and im so glad it finally topped! His build is quite similar to mine but I dont run the immortal or the blasters. I quite like double rekindling as getting it late game is too good for it to be at one.
they have yugioh in nicargua?
why in the tournaments the players uses mora then 40 cards in the deck?
Because those decks have a crapton of searching available to them, so the consistancy doesn't drop off that much. Look at the old Gadget decks; they had 44, 45, 46 card main decks without much issue. Heck, even more recently a 50+ card Mermail deck topped.
ok thanks :)
PhoenixLance13 & not to mention some FireFist deck that got third with *60 cards* nontheless XD
also, remove the dragons for yubel and yubel terror incarnate and one veiler for sacred phoenix so y have acces to the incarnate-nepthys loop.remove void trap hole,breakthrough and prison for 3 call of the haunted.this card is too op in fire kings when opponent mst in it.finally,he could remove the fiendish for skill drain from the side but im not sure if it works well havent tested it.tell me opinions on my ideas pls so i can improve the deck:-)
I'm so happy my deck finally topped I run a similarity build so I know I'm going in the right direction :p
Huh.. No Destruct Potion? I run three and it does amazing...
No Ancient Forest? Interesting
Literally the exact same as my build minus trap cards.
That is a really start way to use an earthbound immortal I wish those cards were used more
there's also the earthbound immortal otk
which is not consistent like at all :
Besides the Wolfbark and Breakthrough Skill this deck is really budget. Hopefully this will not lead to even more of a Fire King influx.
why not? everyone is complaining about the dominance of dragons; it's nice to see rogue decks, like frog monarch, agents, and gladiator beast, do great, even if these are just regionals decks. It's good to see variety, especially in this stale dragon-dominated format
The pronunciation in the anime was actually koo-koo-ri-ah
@n3nshat11 fire kings arent tier 1.i play them for 6 months and i assure the deck is very op,but its not tier 1(at least not now next format who knows...)about this build...its not bad build,and its kinda budget,althought for more cheap replace wolfbark with another rekindling and boar for flamvell magician.magician has 200 def rekindling target easier late game crimson blader without using up a circle of the fire kings since the circle is the key to the dark hole loop
Looks just like my build, minus the earthbound. I rekindle works fine guys.
1 rekindling , 1 wolfbark , only 1 tiger king.... , no bujintei kagutsuchi...
This build is hilarious
it's Christopher, not christian lol XD
Dat Earthbound Immortal
Oh, and FARST
Fire Decks Tier 1 !!!!
Wow, no maxx'c in a deck!
maxx if for bad decks, or for use vs special summoning decks, is bad for the main deck
kioyix2 ...you real?
Michaelc Truong I don't know what he's smoking.
imo the reason is drawing granix (spelling) would be bad and a card that helps do that wouldn't flow well with his deck. thats also why he runs 42
But Yaksha gets around that problem.. Drawing BigBird definitely slows the deck down, but not enough to not run MaxxC.
I really don't see why the ferret.
About blaster, pls stop putting ED in every fucking thing guys... he might be playing here more fire monsters then a FK should, but this doesn't make blaster any better, or this strategy viable to me. unless he is tryign to put as much dmg on board as possible against ED.
The best trick to this deck after using in regional is 3 scrap-iron scarecrows. 2 monsters over 2700 to kill graunix? rare. it gives you time, sometimes stun your opp completely, and make him waste resources to get over graunix.
opp spending resources to field = FK WIN.
blaster is there when you draw into Fire King High Avatar Garunix and it helps fuel circles
Why are you mad? You would be dumb to not include a great card that puts pressure on the board with Garunix. You play darks and lights in your deck? Why not add BLS?
BLS got tremendous effects, and stays as a huge 3k beater. blaster cannot be brought back that much cause the lack of use in monsters, and for having targets for circle. the deck doesn't need 2800 beater to get over things, graunix deals with monsters, that's the all idea behind the card...
yes, the deck is slow by having only graunix on field, but you rather have a trap\veiler to defend the monster that make your whole strategy... it's too easy to get over 2700. And if you want something that you can reuse like blaster, go with scrap-iron scarecrow. it would go well with ferret too cause when the opp tries to sit on a boos graunix can't kill, and you can't blow the field that moment, you can just ram into it with ferret and clear the field for graunix.
With garunix cleaning the field every standby phase u can easily get blaster out for good damage
Ye, The +2800 DMG is great, but won't you rather have defence for graunix, and not giving the opp a nice chance to use TT and the mirrors + being have to pla more fire monsters to make blaster live?