Charlie's Angels - A Perfect Storm
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2019
- So with the news that Charlie's Angels has bombed at the box office, I figured it would be a good time to take a look at the movie and try to figure out why. Grab your drinks, and join me as I explore the anatomy of this failure.
- บันเทิง
Want to help support this channel? Consider subscribing on Patreon: www.patreon.com/TheCriticalDrinker
The Critical Drinker they lost me at....well everything but mainly Kristen Stewart. I miss Lucy Liu and no one got punched in the face better than Drew Barrymore.
THIS MOVIE DID NOT HAVE THE SONG THE CHARLIE ANGEL SONG
That this Movie has Patrick Stewart agreeing to appear in it after having read the script make me think the depths of his own self-loathing must be deeper than the Marianas trench. I'll need to borrow Seaquest DSV to find his common sense to why he would agree to belittle himself in such a way (i.e. doing a Jim Phelps) I am now ever more worried that Picard is going to be terrible than I already was (I knew it would be terrible) But I was hoping there might be some entertainment in it that didn't involve Jeri Ryan.
Thoughts on COPPA?
The Critical Drinker praise be to the Critical Drinker his liver died for Hollywood’s sins
It's funny that they point out toxic masculinity in men but use the same qualities to empower women.
C P
Narcissists will project!
I never thought about that and oh my God hahaha mind blown
that's because men don't know how to use masculinity. Only women know these things!
You've just described modern feminism.
Walter Comunello this is sarcasm right
I pirated this movie and *STILL* want a Refund.
That's what I said about Dragon Ball Evolution. I pirated it, on a friend's laptop using their electricity and wifi, and I still paid WAY too much...
I watched the captain marvel review on cinemasins channel one day while testing an apple laptop in the store.
I want my money back,
Now.
Promote piracy will help you get something anything back
Sameee. The McG movies were bad BUT fun AF.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You just won the internet.
There was a hilarious interview where Elizabeth Banks said that men should have enough empathy to watch movies with female leads. I always thought the goal of seeing a movie was to be entertained, not to express "empathy" for the people who made it.
That's literally my sister's explanation of why men should watch women's sports but women are excused from it "because most of us don't watch sports in the first place."
I thought "representation matters." Either it matters or it doesn't.
@@rorygillmore6555 no offence, but I really hope your sister has a functional spare brain for regular daily activities because the one that came up with this idea will get her into trouble
I just watched it because it was a great fuckdoll parade.
I only watched it because it was a great f..kdoll parade.
And I hate that I have to censor my speech, mankind is really just a bunch of wussies.
She did an interview 8 yrs ago on Conan where Kristen says she is tired of crappy girl power movies, now she stars in one.
Hey 20 bucks is 20 bucks lol
She's always on drugs im surprised that's all she said!
And now she's starring in another one about lesbians.
Well, ive been saying fuck this job, and i still work there.
Opinions don't pay the bills.
"why didn't you support this movie?"
"You said it wasn't made for me"
These people are so retarded, they yell at us this movie wasn't made for you. Then yell at us for agreeing with them and not going to their woke feast.
@J M Just like a woman, they never know what they want
@@imperiumoccidentis7351 They want to eat their cake... and then still have it. They want everything... without consequence or other price.
"Wait this whole operation was your idea"
Banks: this movie isnt for men
Men : ok i don't gonna watch that
Banks : how man dare to not watch My movie !!!
I never realized that _not_ seeing a movie could be this much fun!
It's even better to just let the drinker watch this garbage and then mansplain it to the rest of us....15 mins of entertainment versus 1.5 -2 hours of painful watching of pure garbage ....
I have been Not Seeing Movies for a while, and it's way better than actually Going to Movies!
I'm sure glad I anti supported this shit. By so many people not going to see it hopefully the large hit to their pocket makes them take a real hard look at the crapfest they've been turning out.
@@the1onlyteagro Nah! It'll be fine.
Yeah, I totally enjoyed seeing the name on the theater and all of the promotions, and walking right by.
Kristen Stewart unironically looks very pretty done up as a girly girl, even if she’s only doing it satirically
The fact that her "disguise" made her look better than her actual character's look is too funny lol
I was just about to comment that. It's like Bree Larson in Endgame. She was pretty in the first half hour, until she got that God awful haircut
that's racist
Well, except her face, of course.
@@johnnysalery7383is it? The purpose of the clothing you wear shouldn’t always be to make yourself look as attractive as possible, a lot of the time what makes you look good brings some level of awkwardness/discomfort, and that’s especially true for women
Judge Anderson from the 2012 Dredd film is a perfect example of how to make a strong female action hero. She's not punching out men twice her size one after the other, she's using her unique abilities combined with her wits and weaponry to make it through. She even undergoes some proper and believable character development, from nervous and adrenaline-soaked rookie to a more hardened Judge ready to deal with the horrific reality of the job. For God's sake, she can literally read peoples minds and she's a more believable character than anyone in this film.
Dredd (2012),
what a great action flick.
I was trying to think of a strong character who happens to be female recently and this fits perfectly.
@@ReeseLeeArt the fact that this "recent" example is over a decade old is a disturbing thing to think about.
You poor soul, sitting through that shitshow for us.
John Angell it’s a shitty job, but someone has to do this.
Yeah, no shit. I simply couldn't do it.
When u left the movies u should of asked 4 a refund
This comment is insanely underrated
He probably went through 2 bottles of Captain Morgans Rum to help him stay till the end...He IS the critical drinker!
"Men feel annoyed and resentful, and women feel uncomfortable and patronized."
No other line has so perfectly captured the problem with movies like this.
Exactly, he summed it up perfectly..
@@aerial5587 Biggest problem really is alienination more than anything else. Preachiness is not a problem in of itself (James Cameron's Avatar is essentially Ferngully in space and yet is the highest grossing movie ever). The issue with these movies is that you divide your audience at best. 2016 Ghostbusters? Men hated it for being unfunny bullshit, women with any modicum of self awareness was it as stupid pandering bullshit and even the SJW, white apologist types eventually grew a few braincells. This? Horrendous flop. Black Widow? God that was shit and I hope it bombs hard.
@@lorddrayvon1426 I would argue that preachiness actually was a problem in Avatar...but James Cameron is such a good director, and the digitally-aided world he created so remarkable to drink in, that the tonal mistake didn't ruin the proceedings. I was in no hurry to see Avatar, but when I did get around to it I was pleasantly surprised how much I liked it. With one exception...the plot and characters were 1980s cartoon levels of one dimensional and black and white. The lesson to take from that isn't that preachiness can't be the downfall of a movie, but that strong filmmaking in general creates a margin for error even when mistakes happen.
That's why 2016 Ghostbusters went wrong...it was just utterly awful. Contrary to the implied criticism in this particular video, Chris Hemsworth's character was perhaps the only element (other than impressive-looking ghosts in some scenes) I enjoyed, and that's because self-aware goofy Chris Hemsworth is always a good time. But we expect a Ghostbusters movie to make us laugh at a steady rate from beginning to end, and the jokes in this thing were such duds...
@@redsoxu571 Oh boy you are not going to enjoy any of the classics like Indiana Jones then.
@@GordonSeal My bad...I didn't mean to imply that cartoony black and white characterizations are innately bad. On the contrary, they're great in the right media. Indiana Jones (which I love, excepting the fourth, and for very different reasons) was a 1930s serials-inspired adventure series, and in those some one-dimensional villains are expected (the protagonists still manage some nice depth, not surprising given how great Spielberg has always been at characters).
My point in this case was that Avatar had a central major message to it (a very fitting one, IMO), but either didn't trust the audience to handle characters of dimension or else simply was poorly written. We have evil corporations that apparently have zero sense of history regarding the abuse of indigenous populations (unrealistic, or arrogant in thinking that even though the empathy for such peoples has changed that big bad corporations will always care zero about such things, even if only to not upset human customers). We have big bad military, all hoo ha with no humanity whatsoever. Etc. Take the same movie with the same general plot and simply widen the characterizations a bit (some hesitancy, doubt, regret, anything along those lines) and you'd have a stronger movie; create realistically conflicted characters who outright wrestle with the right thing to do and you could have had a masterpiece, given what the film did so well.
If the point was to simply showcase the eye popping effects and world building, Cameron could have pulled back on the plot and made it about exploration and discovery, rather than exploitation. Heck, given the five film plan, that would have made even more sense, saving exploitation, conflict, abuse, rebellion for later, once simply going to Pandora wouldn't be enough for an audience.
That's what I was intending to speak towards. Hope that makes sense!
The worst thing a movie can do is to treat the audience with DISRESPECT.
And if it's a sequel, prequel, remake or reboot, the SECOND worst thing it can do is treat the original source material with disrespect (I'm lookin' at you, repugnant 2014 'Annie' reboot; I bet the Drinker could absolutely fricassee that one if he so chose).
"That's the problem with facts, you see. They don't care about your feelings." This is such a wonderful tidbit of common sense and wisdom. It's unfortunate that it is lost on so many people these days.
"I do this so you don't have to".
Not all heroes wear capes.... Or are sober.
Come on, superheroes ain't sober. You need to be quite drunk before you decide it's OK to go out in a Batman outfit. And let's not even mention Captain America. You'd need to fill me up with booze until I burst before I'm going to dress up as an American flag right before entering a muddy battlefield 🤪
*Hancock has joined the chat
Why does the feminist fantasy of the perfect woman, mimic to the "T", the stereotype of the alpha male...the same stereotype that they're always complaining is "toxic"?
Penis envy.
Good question.
Because "everything" is *men's* faults...
When a wahmen does it, it's okay... by definition.
👍
Because it's there turn, don't ya know.
Just hope I'm still alive to see the cultural backlash to the current state of affairs.
Till then, let the shitshow roll on. 😁😁😁
Two years later, and with She-Hulk and Rings of Power, the lessons CD preached here may finally be bearing fruit.
"One thing men dont like is being disrespected" hallelujah finally someone says it! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Disregarding the "they made all men weak": if your villain is weak, so is your hero. Or heroine. You need a strong villain to show how badass your hero is.
so technically they're all weak
That's way too involved for these sad sjw minds to comprehend. Remember, to them, the world doesn't work based in facts; It works based on the current emotional outrage of a virtue signalling small popular minority...
No! Man bad! Woman strong!
@@kaufmanat1 i don't know where you are from, but it's been a while since facts were important in the grand global discourse - be it feminists, incels, antivaxxers, republicans, or any other vocal group of people.
@@ziglaus was there a time when facts were important to vocal activists?
Women: "We don't need no man"
Also Women: "Charlie's Angel's failed because men didn't go see it". (Scratching my head)
Kevin shots fired
LOL
Exactly what i was thinking.
Right?
Alternatively...
Women: **didn't see it**
Elizabeth Banks: **surprised Pikachu face**
"Its like watching someone throw up, piss and soil themselves. U know you shouldn't look but there's something mesmerizing about such a perfect disaster " This man gets me
Thank goodness for TH-cam. Some writer in Scotland turns out to be the best movie reviewer ever.
They even managed to ruin an already female driven franchise. No gender swaping.
Yeah, naw. That was impressive.
They gender swapped Charlie.
They gender swapped Charlie.
They need to make Charlie's Angels a team of trans
Can this be cited as an example of "toxic femininity"?
The Drinker said it best: it’s a reboot of a remake...God help us
Of a '70 TV show...
Marcg210 yes
Thaaaat's Hollywood, 2019. It's as if they ran almost all the true creatives out of town.
That's usually the point where shit gets silly. lol What makes me laugh is all the 70s remakes were 10 years ago. Missed the damn boat didn't she? lol
@00:58-01:06
Why is it that I am not so surprised that a lot of people didn't even know that the original 1970's TV series even existed? This is truly a very sad time to live in, my friends.
This review was worth the price of the movie! "Mouth Breather and Gigantor" was killing me!
👊🤣x3
"Who was this film for?"
Elisabeth Banks.
Yes but Banks didn't take this movie to the bank. It was a flop
Too bad she ruined her likability from the lego movie and hunger games.
@@-12Sided Wait she was in the Lego movie l didn't even know
@@l_am_a_cookie7055 she was wildstyle
Specifically her ego.
Elizabeth Banks: This movie isn’t for those pesky men!
Also Elizabeth Banks: WaHhHhH mEn DiDn’T gO sEE it! MeN hAtE mE!
@@RoddyPipersCorneas Damn.
@@RoddyPipersCorneas ahhh so it all comes down to daddy issues
@@lowkeyarki7091 of course
She literally claimed that if you don’t pay to watch this movie in cinemas, that you’re a sexist.
The scary thing is, people tried to defend her as if they same people that shit on this movie, enjoy watching the originals.
I just find it funny how women like her think it’s fine to say “there’s been too much men on screen therefore other men shouldn’t have a chance regardless of their talent or merit”
But complain when others say “I don’t think this is good” and cry about how it’s somehow related to what’s between their legs.
Also, not to mention - people would complain seeing Patrick Stewart try to beat up the same people the Angles did for the exact same reasons (unrealistic and stupid) but somehow because he’s a man, it becomes a valid complaint.
@@thatboymeak I guess I’m a sexist then, because I literally had no idea this movie existed until the crapstorm that was 2020.
"I do this so that you won't have to."
That's why I prefer watching your content than seeing the movie itself like most movies these days.
Thanks for your endeavors, critical drinker! Cheers mate.
"There's something mesmerizing about such a perfect disaster" is a great explanation of half my social media activities.
Here's the problem. Charlie's Angel's is a movie about stripper ninjas who neither strip, nor are they ninja.
I like that explanation lol
🤣 this made me laugh
Can we just get some stripper ninja?
only preteen girls like this stuff, question remains: "why let ur impressionable preteen watch this crap"?
I think strippers are played out in cinema, but Id watch a film about female ninja strippers, I mean Roger Corman made a career out of those kind of films. WHERE IS THE CURRENT DAY ROGER CORMAN?!?!?
"The First World War was wrapped up quicker than this thing."
I'm not sure it's fair to draw parallels between Charlie's Angels 2019 and WWI. I mean, one was a tragic, wasteful disaster, and the other was World War I.
Fking LOL
Good one👍
Haha
😂😂😂
Comment had more plot than the movie
"Theoretically, she is a character in this film"
I laughed way harder than that as I should, and I wonder why I haven't been using this phrase before in my own reviews of films and dramas.
Me and my wife were flipping through the movies from our on-demand-movie-provider the other day. Then we saw this Charlie’s Angels-movie passing by.
Me: “This was typically a movie the Drinker negatively discussed.”
My wife: “I understand, you can see it from the picture. Next!”
What did you end up watching?
@@B0mber44 Trainspotting 2. It was entertaining, though it felt like I was watching a recent concert of The Eagles: it were the same actors, it was the same story, but it felt a bit dated.
News: “Men under increasingly hostile social environments, women most affected.”
It's actually true. All those mid 30s women complaining they can't find a man. 😆
I think its the whole point of these movies, so you stay single and resent each other without making family
@@kdgang1 That's a big part of the socialist utopian agenda - breaking down the family unit.
@@kdgang1 All they're making me do is resent Hollywood.
I can't for the life of me imagine how this movie is suppose to be fun to watch for a woman. If I was a woman and saw this, I would just feel embarrassed. Not really positive representation in any sense of the term.
The fact that this and dark fate flopped so hard makes me happy
@Sherie Brodigan oh shut up and get back to the kitchen.
@Andrew Jackson Because they're failing to make a profit out of our favourite things. If that shit of woke-minator was a success they would've made another 2, now they have to lick their wounds, and so has to do that Bank-feminazi. Anyway it's not like you can consider those things canon.
@Andrew Jackson I see your point, but the only thing we can do is talk about how bad they're, making them fail at the boxoffice and making famous movies that really are good, helping them stay relevant in the history of film making, and that's not something these sjws will be able to erase.
Eventually new generations of actors and directors will crave a piece of that fame and they'll make what the public really wants. That's what I think and what I hope.
Alex Freetime Yep, there’s people on TH-cam making their own low budget tv series. There’s old tv shows and movies we can look around for and watch.
Ghostbusters: 2019.
Universal Theory of Kristen Stewart:
If she's in a low-budget indie flick, see it.
If she's in a big-budget blockbuster, skip it.
You can say that to every other actors. Indie flicks offers them better scripts to work with than blockbusters. Blockbusters tend to focus on dollar signs than actually crafting a good movie. Even female empowerment stuff does it better in indie movies than in blockbusters (well Mad Max Fury Road was amazing blockbuster too that has feminist as the main theme of the movie). I always prefer indie films over blockbusters. I think she can be good in a big budget blockbuster, she just wasn't given a good material to work with. It's now mostly on the material than the actor
Nailed it!
In the interest of ballance here, the line "There was a gun fight at my wedding" "I didn't know you were married." "I'm not, I was the better shot." was actually well delivered and (compared to the other attempts in the movie) quite a good joke... and the "movie buff scene" mostly worked. And they are the only positives I can come up with.
"as if this is The Bourne Identity for women..."
*DO NOT GIVE THEM IDEAS*
If I'm not mistaken the next victim is James Bond... Man I am so pissed about that one.
Ok i am black and love me some representation but this goes to far man.
They have made a female equalizer 😁😁😂😂
@@blackmantis3130 Yeah, with freaking Queen Latifah!!! An overweight middle-aged woman!!! But hey, she's a black woman so it's all good. What an absurd embarrassing fucking joke!
😂😂😂
Not only is no one surprised this bombed, I doubt anyone cares.
I care cause it sets a precedent. So movies like StarWars will make money regardless of how bad they are and encourage people to keep turning franchises into trash.
Maybe woke journos care, but only because they get paid for it. For the time being.
I care very much that it should fail thank you.
Lucius Fawkes Probably a lot more. Hollywood are so self absorbed with their narrative that they’re probably oblivious.
I didn't even know it existed until it was announced it flopped
Now I wanna go see the original Charlie's Angels. I was too young to appreciate it when it came out, and it might be really fun to watch now.
The originals were great, and exactly as he describes. Fun and light-hearted and didn't take themselves too seriously. There was no need for this terrible remake.
Oh Critical Drinker, I salute & drink to you. There is too much, beautifully articulate, much needed, magnificent commentary to single out to comment on here so, bless you Sir, I'll have another drink to you!
"Jesus, the first world war was wrapped up quicker than this thing"
And there goes my coffee
Jackisawinner even quicker if you are a yank.
To be fair, it was almost exactly 14 years between the 9/11 terror attacks and the completion of the Freedom Tower to replace the WTC, while the empire state building took barely over a year to build. The war in Iraq and Afghanistan have lasted nearly 20 years, while WW2 lasted not even 10. Everything takes longer now - even if they are pointless and without virtue compared to their antecedents.
You need better critical drinking skills Jacki...
@@aeternusdoleo4531 My mistake, was that it wasn't alcohol...
No kidding! I almost blew coffee out my nose twice on this review!
“Jesus, the First World War was wrapped up faster than this.”
Holy shit this was gold, almost spat out my drink.
You're going to make me cry. Fuck it, let me simp for a bit. Heil Kaiserreich! Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser.
@Generously buttered ALCO
I‘m impressed. You didn’t make any mistakes in spelling
@@davidschneider9145 Danke
@Alexander Steel because, I, ein englischer Sprecher, made no mistakes in spelling.
@@mimikyupikachu4385 Yes
This was one of the first of your videos I watched, Drinker, and it completely changed how I write the women characters in my novels! Thank you. Sometimes I come back to watch it just for a refresher.
The last 2 minutes of this video is the most concise and straight to the point breakdown, judge and jury for Hollywood that I've seen in any (Drinker) video, and Drinker has produced many quality takedowns. Chapeau, my sharp tongued friend.
“I do this, so you don’t have to.”
Thank you for you’re service.
your* But you are right
-so I liked.
It's almost comparative to a grenade reference at this point.
-The Nostalgia Drinker
@@MrNebelschatten greetings fellow grammar Nazi haha
"THE POWER OF PAIN COMPELS YOU!"
*angelic chorus*
Wow... TH-cam adrolls are better comedians than the people who wrote that "comedy" movie.
Is it bad that I’m only hearing about this movie three years later, here on your channel?? Lol 😂. It was so bad Hollywood tried to hide it 🤣😂🤣
I can't believe they cast Justin Bieber as an angel.
That was good.
😂😂😂 burn bro
Loki Lyesmyth Comment of the day 😆
Surely they couldn't cast him as a devil.
Loki!
The movies are woke, but the profits are asleep
Plot Twist the movie is just as sleep. Good joke tho
brilliant
The profits went to Red Dead 2 instead. Something actually worth its value.
Wealthy elite donors with hollywood ties: Plenty more money where that came from...
Well played.😂😂
If I ran a TV station, I'd give you your own show during prime time.
"Mouth breather" "Gigantor" "Smug business man" "Magical science lady" and so on and so forth, Critical you manufacturer of much loved monikers of movie characters you've done it again my friend.
Yeah, except he got "The guy from 'Gladiator'" wrong.
Yeah, some of my favorites: "Lumpy alien bodybuilder", "Rambo Impostor", and of course "Apple genius "
I particularly like his names in "Prometheus". I find myself involuntarily laughing several times when watching most of CD's videos.
My personal favorite is "Magical space wizard wearing a fishbowl filled with bong smoke," which is from his review of Spiderman: Far From Home.
I love his term for Grace in Terminator Dark Fate - “Androgynous Thing” 😂😂 and his accent just makes everything sound better
When movies have narcissistic personality disorder: the movie
When IP too weak.... let face it a lot of Hollywood weirdo don't get it...
Melon Race when movies get extremely toxic about sexes just to stop sexism: the thousand-or-so frames of regret!
The TV show was cool. I still remember it. It was smart, it was sexy, and it was filled with hot 70s babes and cool 70s studs. More importantly, it gave the characters power organically. Each of the characters had a coherent backstory as to why they were they way they were and how they ended up working for Charlie. And those stories weren't just there and forgotten, but occasionally cropped up and were built on, creating a solid story arc and the very thing this cheap knockoff tried to siphon off for itself: fun. That's right. It was a fun TV show. Remember fun? That's what this movie wasn't, and why it failed.
I remember Elizabeth Banks from one thing: Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy as J. Jonah Jameson's secretary
That repeated elbow to the head looks like she's trying to wipe a smudge off his face.
It looked like a special attack I'd have invented as a ten year old.
LMAO, I kept thinking the same thing, it looked like it wouldn't even hurt.
Wouldn't even crack a glass jaw.
I figured if you hit a dude that many times in the face with your elbow and he (not particularly strong) managed to 1) not lose consciousness and 2) continually support your weight... you might need fight classes
@That Frosty Ape Followed by an elbow drop.
Seeing her throw those elbows makes me cringe every damn time.
It's almost like she's trying to wash the semen she just ejaculated on that man's face off like a windshield wiper on a sports car. smh
The weird thing is, it's like she's rubbing his face with her forearm
@@comyxcon4gaming860 she's a he?
@@cyoungbe1 Female.
I read this comment and thought, "Hm, I mean, was it that bad?" Watches her their the elbows again. "Ohh my god that's f*cking atrocious."
I think more people saw your video on the movie, than the movie itself lol
Absolutely incredible explanation of this film and many of the problems within Hollywood currently! 👏
Alternative movie title: "Patrick Stewart Picks Up A Check"
Wouldn't be the first time he played as the heavy for a cheque. Remember 1996's Masterminds? Also a load of crap.
@Box Jabber Must be a pretty hefty bill... after all he played a piece of sh!t in the Emoji movie too....
Ready my horse.
They once asked Uwe Boll,how the fuck he got Sir Ben Kingsley to play in his shitty "Blood Rayne" movie.
Boll aswered:
"Well, I guess even an acclaimed actor like Kingsley has bills to pay,ja?"
@crazyrabbits let's not forget him playing a literal piece of shit on Emoji movie. Hitting a rock bottom, breaking through and going even further beyond.
Funny how the Critical Drinker, who is only one man, is more accurate than Rotten Tomatoes 100% of the time.
The only way he could make this better is to actually be hammered while reading his laser precise analysis.
According to audiences, Critical Drinker is more accurate than Rotten Tomatoes 98% of the time, but according to critics, he's only more accurate 7% of the time.
he is better at writing than 99% of Hooliwood writer
Why does this movie have 79% on rotten from audience score when both the critics score and imdb score are way lower?
Less than 100%. Drinker missed the mark on HBO’s Watchmen.
Elizabeth Banks: "You hate this movie because you hate powerful women"
Me: points at- Princess Leia, Wonder Woman, Mystique, Lara Croft, Kumiko, Jyn Erso, Wanda, etc.
Furiosa from mad max
Claudia Cardinale in Once Upon a Time in the West. Hanoi Jane in Barbarella
Samus, Lara Croft, The Bride, Buffy, and Ripley
Here it is 3 years later, and not only has Hollywood not woken up to not pissing off their audience, they've doubled down on this kind of crap again, and again, and again.
So basically, this movie took everything wrong with American women and projected it onto men.
Yes, it is a movie made after 2016.
@MrNahual2099 girls beating up guys had always been well received, that isn't why this movie failed.
@Zoomer Waffen hahaha, yeh the story of every day modern society...is there anywhere we can escape too that is still free to express the love of a heterosexual woman while trying to romanticize her without being called a misogynistic bigot!?
Ahh so you realized America's problem.
@@jansmith8872 Japan, maybe rusia, some parts por asia etc... Basically most of the world except the western "world".
Banks: "This movie isn't made for men."
OG Charlie's Angels: Literally made for men.
and teenage boys
Cameron my mom was actually around when the show was popular and said it was for both. Boys loved how hot the girls were and girls wanted to be the angels because how awesome they were
That show was pretty good
tbf the OG show came from a time when , they kept it simple
@@amandapanda3657 Sounds like winning formula.
"I do this so you dont have to"
Thank you Drinker, we all appreciate it you suffering through this crap
I LOVE the old series from the 70s because - cool 70s clothes, cool 70s hair, cool girls doing cool stuff. But there's more to it: the first season had really good whodunnit scripts that WORKED. The script quality declined from the second season onward. My point is, the old series became famous because it had good writing.
In the original series, the girls were also ex-policewomen. Which explains why they knew jiu jitsu, how to examine a suspect's room, etc. In both reboots, the girls are just ... born superhuman, I guess?
I for one am OUTRAGED: This is 2019, the Charlie's Angels remake should be starring a diverse multicultural cast of MEN as the Angels, because reversing things is always woke.
Charlie's mangels
Sorry, but Woke is a one way street.
benjovi55 also bald and midgets
You say this as a joke but I wouldn’t mind a guys team, straight or gay, to be part of this franchise. The 2000 movie didn’t pretend to be anything other than fluff but still had girl power elements and waaay better action scenes. How does that happen?!
The 2019 one could have at least had “atomic blonde” or “John Wick” level action scenes - but the movie wasn’t enough of anything.
Plus the fact that any light hearted calmness the original had was erased in this one COMPLETELY
Baaaaahhhhhh
Midnight's edge remarked, "more women saw Rambo: Last blood than Charlie's angels". That's got to burn.
I know of no one who saw this piece of shit in theaters. Or Ghostbusters 2016...
@@robertfitzgerald3118 I did.
As someone who thought Rambo: Last Blood was trash too (never liked that plot they mentioned for a decade or trashing Rambo's attempt at a new life in such a manner, much preferred John Rambo as an ending and solid sequel better than 3), I'm still not suprised at all.
@@oneandonlysound3453 it was trash. there was no story like rambo first blood
@@TheFourthWinchester now I know exactly one person who decided to waste his money on this movie
I'm so happy I found the Drinker. I no longer need to waste so much time on hyped bullshit. The "Recommends" playlist is a goldmine. Going through these reviews is a breath of fresh air. I can obviously tell when a movie is a disappointment, but the Drinker can tell me why it is so :) :)
i freaking love how you refer to other actors as their other bigger roles
I worked on this film. Half the crew banged our heads into the wall seeing from day1 of production quite how awful it was gonna be. And more than a few of us have said "we hope at least the drinker does something good with this!". ;)
I'm so sorry. It indeed must have been a horrific experience to work on this film in any capacity.
So the Drinker actually has a following among people in the film industry?
@@ingold1470 VINDICATION
Just keep in mind, your future clients may be watching. Never complain about clients on social media 😉
@@robbylebotha nah, it'll be fine 😆
Those feminist filmmakers should take a lesson from Terminator or Alien movies. Ripley and Connor are the true example of badass action characters that don't have to scream "Women are better than men" every screen.
Hell yeah
I think Hit-Girl was the best representation of feminism. Mindy doesn’t CARE what people think of her. She tried doing the makeup and the dating and the dances and all of it was thrown back in her face. When her dad was killed, she didn’t cry. She didn’t complain. She got PISSED and went and killed the men who took her only family left. And guess what?! An ADULT MAN punches her! He CHOKES her! And not ONCE does Mindy cry or try to use her gender or age as a handicap. She bit him, stabbed him where she could reach, and used her appearance to an advantage even. And this was 2009/2010/2011.
Even Sidney Prescott from SCREAM. She was a 17 year old girl who’d seen her mom cut up. The first time Ghostface tried to kill her, she dodged and even kicked him in the leg when being thrown. And she only gets tougher and tougher with each sequel. By Scream 4 she asks Ghostface to come after her and minutes later kicks him square in the jaw.
@@Blast2224 Don't forget The Bride (Not spoiling her real name, in case you haven't seen it) from the 'Kill Bill' movies.
No, they won’t learn! They will want to push it even more.
We appreciate your work TCD, you save us valuable time by not letting us watch any of these garbage. You deserve all the likes and praise in the world.
Damn, the recap of this movie is absolutely on target and I’m a psychologist. Well done.
Everyone likes movies that feel like a lecture. Right?
Being told something that ain't so makes it dislikeable. A factually correct lecture of the truths that need to be told can be entertaining.
How dare you!
Thank you, morally bankrupt film makers who were knowingly working with sexual predators for years, for telling me how to be a better man.
I prefer actual lectures to movies that feel like lectures... bitch, you're not even subtle.
Hollywood wouldn't keep pumping them out if they weren't huge hits with general audiences...... right?
"The women are universally smart, virtuous, incorruptible, tough, confident, outspoken, highly skilled at everything, and physically unstoppable."
...unless someone turns up wearing the same dress, amiright?!
HELL HATH NO FURY
Oh then its on, unless perhaps its a man transitioning into a woman cant be transphobic can we hollywood
CHL, shouldn't you be berating some flerfers and the likes, rather than just having fun here?
@@Alessandro-B You mind your own business do you know how often one of the channels that I love comments on another channel I love.
BA-DUM TISHHHH!
When you mentioned the FP activist trying to do a cartwheel, it sounded like you were trying not to laugh.
I loved the original two Charlie's Angels films, great actors, great fight scenes, great soundtracks, great fun!
I, personally, can't wait to not see this movie.
I'm actually not seeing it RIGHT NOW!!
How crazy is that???
@@FeralLogic Lucky! I have to wait until the weekend to not watch this film. So looking forward to seeing anything but.
I'm probably pirate it. I buy movies that are good but this? Meh....
@ MST3K...
Can I go and not see it with you?
There's a big difference between well developed female character and a feminists propaganda
Correct. See, Alita: Battle Angel to see a developed female character
Correct. A strong female is a woman with character whereas feminism is a leftist ideology.
The best FEMALE character ever written (IMO) is Elizabeth Bennett from Pride & Prejudice. She is strong (keeping secrets SECRET instead of blabbering the out to everyone else), independent (not following the "general behaviour" of other women in her family, especially her mother) and has courage ... which gets showcased in one of the best "female duels" ever [watch the version from 95, NOT the one with Keira Knightley who cant act]: th-cam.com/video/LcaEN8eVBfk/w-d-xo.html it lasts for 6+ minutes and is taken 100% directly from the book.
@@Muck006 The 95 tv version was the one starring Colin Firth? That was a great version. Six well made hours. As female characters go I also like Jane Eyre. She also was strong, intelligent and independent. Those novels illustrate that strength is not about violence against men.
Dominic Decoco Oh this was a feminist movie I didn’t know it was just that I thought it was a really bad movie but this one however is bad
I love Tyrion's added commentary.
"Mouth-Breather and Gigantor"
FUCKING LOL🤣
It's true what they say: Get Woke, Go Broke.
*_" Woke Movies hurt Men's Movie Prospects "_*
:)
Why this comment isn't at the top,it has 300 likes ,I think TH-cam active sensorship
Kristen Stewart only agreed to do this movie on the condition that she would be paid in Xanax.
Ok , that was hilarious.
That's why she smiled! Oh, it all makes sense 🤣
Fucking epic mate!
She mentioned she was chewing on them in her new film underwater. This mouth breather can’t get enough of em so makes sense.
Are you sure it wasn’t that she wanted to hook up with the director? She’s been down that road before....
Mouth-Breather, Gigantor and Magical-Science Lady. 😂
It's October 7,2022 ,and I'm barely finding out that movie existed.
"This movie isn't for men."
"Bye!" goes 50% of the audience.
"Bye!" goes another 48% who've got better things to do than whinge and whine about the other 50%.
Director and remaining 2%. OoO
Director and the others: they're anti-feminist
Dammit it’s on 69
They did the same with Birds of Prey. Feminists told men it wasn't for them and not to go and see it then when the film flopped they blamed men for it even though they told them it wasn't for them.
Nothing like realizing that more women watched Rambo than this movie!
@@TheRatedOniChannel I kind of wanted to watch Rambo, but I get a bit squeamish with gore. I'm trying to get over it. That and my fear of ghosts. And water where I can't see the bottom. And crowds. And large dogs.
"Parodies of women" that explains feminism perfectly, so perfectly.
I love you Mr. Drinker. 🍻❤️
This video was better than I hoped.
Great that the perfect Drinker video is entitled The Perfect Storm. This is bashed in all the right ways for all the right reasons. I for one am glad this movie got made for two reasons: One, sothat I could not go see it, and two, so this video could get made and I can see it over and over
"women can do anything"
oh yeah? like flop?
Wahmen: challenge accepted
@Douglas Fisher Careful with their diseases fam, leftist extremists have been in some NARLY places
Totally agree. Why should only men make crap movies that bomb?
A triple belly flop in this case.
Charlies Angels 2019
- Sponsored by Gillette -
GozUnlimited the best a ma’am can get.
Surprised they didn't have Stewart be gay while they were at it
Obligatory-
th-cam.com/video/Lb6OpRfyLFo/w-d-xo.html
Might be an old comment but ever since that terrible ad I still have never bought a gilette product and I never will again, that shit is the WORST a REAL man can get. Go support Old Spice
@Alexander Steel Damn I'm a pussy compared to you
Having nicknames for everyone made the story more interesting 😂. I can't lie.
I think you will find that Elizabeth Banks does actually wink at the camera, several times on 5:16
Kristen Stewart punching that guy is laughable.
It looks clearly fake hitting. She's like jabbing him with her elbow and clearly missing and he's overreacting with his head movement.
Yeah those forearms had the power of a feather and wouldn't even crack a glass jaw.
These girls can’t film action
Yeah it was cartoonish lol I honestly couldn't tell if she was supposed to be making contact with her fist or her elbow due to the terrible fight choreography. First off, the angle of the camera wasn't helping matters given that it was already clear that Stewart was barely even attempting to make believable contact.
Secondly, if she was supposed to be punching as opposed to an elbow strike, her fist looked more like it was flailing, not punching and her elbow itself was flopping so much that even a haymaker would've lost any and all impact. I know I'm going a bit in-depth about these minute details, but I can't help noticing these kind of details.
I grew up watching martial arts movies and I also train in martial arts as well, on top of having been active in theatre courses since I was in high school. As a result, one thing I did learn in regards to stage combat was the importance of certain details when performing a fight scene.
Due to that, I can't help but laugh in derision at Kristen Stewart's attempt at playing a badass. There are so many women who make hand to hand combat look effortless on screen, and to be blunt, she isn't one of them.
Ronin 6 Elizabeth Banks can’t film action
"Jesus, the First World War was wrapped up quicker than this thing"
Holy shit he's right! WWI lasted 4 years, This lasted 5!
Edit:
How the hell did this comment get 166 likes in just 5 hours???
Seemed to last longer watching it !
Bart Ryun wait? What? You watched it?!...Jesus I hope the sex was worth it....
Well, it wasn't entirely wrapped up, we've got a sequel a couple years later.
I really hope it won't be a case with this one.
@@keimakatsuragi3040,
Ahhhh, I see what you did there.....
@@keimakatsuragi3040,
Ahhhh, I see what you did there.....
Remember what happened in The Perfect Storm? The boat sank and everybody died. Pretty much sums up my feelings about Charlie's Angels.
Did he just say facts don't care about your feelings? Brave man, Brave!
Díaz, Lou, and Barrymore didn’t have an agenda in mind when the movie was made. They were probably like, wow this is a ridiculous script let’s have some fun and since we are actors people are going to watch this so let try to make it fun for them.
Imagine a movie made for the sake of fun and entertainment... the horror....
That was horrible, too.
Exactly 😉
FYI, it's spelled Liu. But yeah, it was a fun bit of camp. Kinda like D.E.B.S., but with less overt lesbians.
Also, the victories in those earlier movies meant something because the male and female antagonists were clever and dangerous. If someone overcomes someone like that it feels empowering because it IS. If the heroes are already infallible, who cares?
The thing is the older movies didn’t just have some petty white dude as the villain, the first movie was a partnership of a super genius and his female partner (who was most of the driving force of their plans and quite handy in a fight) and the sequel was a former member of there own group who had basically decided to use her skills as a former angel to massively profit. They’re was no agenda of “men do bad, woomen gooder!” Within the movie as a whole