I will not even try to imagine how an electron can generate a tiny magnetic field if has no volume to rotate in all. Thanks for the vids Don!! Greetings from argentina.
Love the videos. I have a suggestion that would enhance the experience for mobile users like myself: provide links for the videos you reference, such as the original QED video, in the description so we can jump to them as well. the in-video linking does not work for us, and simply pauses the video. Thanks!
The reciprocal relationship of the calculation required to make the predicted value, is an "existence" interpretation. It emulates the field/process that condenses into the "design component". So it's the test of tuning an understanding of the general function of how the universe operates by reverse reasoning from physical space time to timing integration of point-like objectives in space, and back. An electron in its orbital does this naturally, because the orbital dimensions are the field "calculation", motion of design, and the interference point objective is the electron, so the general context of time/interference infers the specific components of all existence in this way by hyper-hypo oscillation/information. The relationship demonstrated with precision in this video is a foundation from which to extend practical science. Great video.
Unraveling the secrets of the universe, one number at a time. I like to imagine a place in the future where we have the technology to do more than what we think is possible with these numbers. All thanks to people like you guys, so please keep doing what you do :-)
Fermilab, I love your videos. They help me to understand physics which I need to know because I want to make a thesis in quantum mechanics from a philosophical point of view. Thank you, you are really clear explaining difficult concepts.
This channel is outrageously cool!!! I love the way you explain the topics, really well made videos, bringing it to the point rather quickly without flashy effects.... just what I like... short and to the point... just subscribed! Thanks for making such cool videos!!!
at 5:16 one can't click over to the the "physics of g-2" video, also doing a search it also can't be found, Would be very interesting to get some idea how those precise measurements were done.
Dear Don; no, this is not a dear John letter. In one of the many Feynman lectures, he defines space as; “a set of dots in a cubic array”. How is this possible? How are this so-called “dots” suppose to be physically connected? In the case of a set of 12 lines in a cubic array where the 3D pattern of the 12 lines is space; not the volume (the inside of the cube), the lines are connected
I think in his visualisation of this cubic arrayic space, the particles or quantum fluctuations warp from one dot to another. The maximum speed at which this warping can take place is at light speed, which is questionable since warping should happen instantly. Sorry I contradicted myself which is why I am not fine
While it may be modeled as a spinning sphere, there is no explanation of what it is, that is spherical, or why it'd be stable as a sphere, or how long it takes to become spherical after it's been created... When I've tried answering that sort of question, I find some interesting answers that have lain fallow since more than a century ago; Physics is slow learning...
Benjamin Franklin, was first, by assigning positive charge to electric current but then physicists reversed the charges.... And then we, re-reverse, the charges by philosophy identifying mass as energy trying to escape its mass trap-leaving a void spot-thus electron current is dipolar-backfilling of positive, space-charge...
3:29 Rounding discrepancy? Measurement is a registration of what you measured (duh?), while a calculative prediction like any calculator will round off the last number, which would mean the prediction is one digit more detailed predicting it will be higher than 4. 5:02 I watched this dude for the first time so not fully initiated into his sense or absense of humor, but this seems to be an oxymoron, so hopefully it is physics-comedy 101. Could anyone direct me at an introdcution video please? ;-)
i got a Question, Will the magnetic moment of an electron differ in a changing gravitational field, logically it seems that a the measurement would differ out in space or near a black hole, anyone know? i propose a magnetic moment experiment on the space station.
A virtual particle is a particle that 'exists' within the quantum uncertainty expressed by the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. At a very small time scale the energy of a system is uncertain by an amount large enough to allows new particles to be created. These 'live' only briefly, and the more energetic they are, the sooner they have to 'die'. Nevertheless, during their ephemeral presence they do have some physical effects. In fact all forces (possibly excepting gravity, because we do not yet have a proper quantum theory for it) are the result of exchanging virtual particles.
spin? Like a in a system with one electron and one proton: Electron have full spin and proton have no spin the system would sum to 1 full spin? Electron have half spin, proton having half spin in the opposite direction and the sum of spin in the system is one? Electron with no spin and the proton with full spin and the system would have a total spin of 1? Electron have a spin of half and the proton having a spin of half and both are spinning in the same direction and the total spin of the system is zero?
Well, that is not how it works. First of all both proton and neutron have spin s=1/2. But anyway, to spin addition in quantum mechanics. (At least before the second quantization, which I have not yet studied). Here is how it works: If you add a system with spin (or angular momentum) of say s1 and another with spin s2, then you will have a new spin of {s1+s2, s1+s2-1, ..., |s1-s2| }. This means that you will have a system that has S = s1 + s2 with a certain probability, S = s1 + s2 - 1 with another, and so on. Let's say that you have to fermions with s = 1/2. Then you can have S = 0 and S = 1.
Questions and a answer: The need to explain how does the magnetic field continue to get emitted as a area over flow force? Does it help to stay aware it is probable the atoms we see today were the same atoms a million years ago? Is dark energy/matter something like gravity support in empty Space - building blocks of accumulation logics that would announce some structure happening to a great distance it is finally there? Is entanglement the logic of every atom, shares the different forces passing at its own level of fill, >>>>>> including the changes the weather circulation daily/hourly/minutes/secondly excites the atoms and not found with just in place logics the atoms are doing nothing? So where does the energy come from for flowing support of forces that could be used as energy too? Noting energy is logically said a excited state that automatically is seeking to gain its neutral state again. (Millions of years logic!)(No friction or resistance to its loss leading.){Space making everything a constant logic.} The possible rocket fuel: The Sun's radiation/light emission does 'not' pass through the Earth to the core, thus can not be the source of giving a endless flow to every atom! But the Sun's gravity 'does' pass through Earth all the way to the opposite side in complete support to logical flow guide of every atom. The giving of the constant inertia force of the static kind constantly supplied to the every atom no matter where it is located. Gravity does form the foundation for the atom's different passing forces to either absorb or reflect the force(s), and make use of them {Entanglement properties of many things happening at the same time}! Otherwise the atom would be bounced of Newton's Law Properties of free flow sharing with any force passing its area!!
It is the holographic universe that Fermilab started some time ago. Thanks for the links, I will look at them. Is Leonard Susskind involved with the Fermilab experiment?
A possible explanation of the dual slit experiment utilizing QED??? 1. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 2. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have an associated magnetic field with them. 3. Photons also have an electric component and a magnetic component to them. 4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is going through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves. 5. Via QED, newly generated photons might occur. 6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. Gives the illusion of a wave particle duality but is not that way in actual reality. 7. As far as a detector is concerned, it probably has an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or lack thereof), with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed. Just a guess on my part that seems to make sense to me. Would need to be verified to know for sure one way or the other.
external confirmation is not really 'self-confirmation' is it? all it tells us is that our mathematics of divergence is incomplete, kind of amazing that science could still lead mathematics places even though math has become so far developed beyond our idea of the world.../
Yeah I know all about it. I Also know that if you drop a decimal off the end of the prediction/measurement they will equal the same. Try it out yourself. I Do it all the time in labs. I put on a white coat and take all kinds of measurements. Yeah, I built s time machine too. Everybody tells me its a time capsule and I keep telling them its the same thing. I've been to the future too. It's nice there. TH-cam comments are where all physics get worked out and we froze the sun bc global warming was killing penguins. No flying cars though. Horse and cart was proven to be the most eco friendly mode of transportation and oceans were drained to allow free passage between continents on horse backs. The fish were relocated to the swimming pools of rich people where they were neglected and poisoned with pool additives and chlorine until every species of aquatic life form was wiped from existence. Sea fish are replaced by robotic land sharks that roam the dried ocean floor, in the lawless desert between continents. Few of the mutated humans that populate the sea floors live through an encounter with a land shark. Cats are very popular too.
Thanks for the video.
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky hahaha we keep bumping into each other in the comment section
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Eugene Khutoryansky, thank YOU! I'd love for you to make a video on QED by the way, would be awesome!!
+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Ayyye, you make sick videos.
Really like your videos Fermilab guy.
I will not even try to imagine how an electron can generate a tiny magnetic field if has no volume to rotate in all. Thanks for the vids Don!! Greetings from argentina.
I wish that I had Dr. Lincoln or someone like him for my physics teacher. These videos are very easy to understand. Thanks.
QED = Quantum ElectroDyanimcs
QED = Quod Erat Demonstrandum (literally meaning "hence proved")
coincidence?
Illuminati confirmed!
Love the videos. I have a suggestion that would enhance the experience for mobile users like myself: provide links for the videos you reference, such as the original QED video, in the description so we can jump to them as well. the in-video linking does not work for us, and simply pauses the video. Thanks!
The reciprocal relationship of the calculation required to make the predicted value, is an "existence" interpretation. It emulates the field/process that condenses into the "design component". So it's the test of tuning an understanding of the general function of how the universe operates by reverse reasoning from physical space time to timing integration of point-like objectives in space, and back.
An electron in its orbital does this naturally, because the orbital dimensions are the field "calculation", motion of design, and the interference point objective is the electron, so the general context of time/interference infers the specific components of all existence in this way by hyper-hypo oscillation/information.
The relationship demonstrated with precision in this video is a foundation from which to extend practical science. Great video.
Unraveling the secrets of the universe, one number at a time. I like to imagine a place in the future where we have the technology to do more than what we think is possible with these numbers. All thanks to people like you guys, so please keep doing what you do :-)
I love this channel because it makes videos on topics not found elsewhere !
Fermilab, I love your videos. They help me to understand physics which I need to know because I want to make a thesis in quantum mechanics from a philosophical point of view. Thank you, you are really clear explaining difficult concepts.
This channel is outrageously cool!!! I love the way you explain the topics, really well made videos, bringing it to the point rather quickly without flashy effects.... just what I like... short and to the point... just subscribed! Thanks for making such cool videos!!!
I remember Feynman writing those numbers on a blackboard. Quantum showing-off ;)
Thanks, Dr Lincoln !
Feynman sure as hell hit that nail on the head dead center. lol Could you do a video on Scalar Field please. What is it, what does it mean for QM.
You guys make amazing videos. This was amazing, thanks.
I'm learning classical electrodynamics and realized part way through that QED is where its at
at 5:16 one can't click over to the the "physics of g-2" video, also doing a search it also can't be found,
Would be very interesting to get some idea how those precise measurements were done.
"You can take a look at my video on quantum foam, if that interests you."
*Anything* you explain interests me!
:)
Hi Guys, where's the other video that's alluded to in this? Thanks - keep up the great work!
+ScienceNinjaDude
Was looking for the g-2 one - thanks
I just found the Fermilab channel and am finding it absolutely excellent. Is the physics of g-2 video still "coming soon"?
You will rock the world, Keep going on guys, SCIENCE IS LOVE
Awesome! Thanks for sharing this on TH-cam, great video excellent detail and quality!
that level of prediction is absolutely mind shattering xD thanks for making these videos. Keep up the good work
0:32 People lacking curiosity and refinement just got roasted.
Bubbadoobop Exactly! 😂😂😂
Thank you! Experimental evidence for QED -- just what I needed?
Gotta love Richard Feynman!
thank you so much for this wonderful channel!!!
All ways very informative, well worth being woken up at 10:20PM. What are the chances?
it is 5:20 am right now, I'm halfway asleep in a bus, listening to something about quantum electrodynamics... where am I going with my life?
+ScienceNinjaDude Does Fermilab hire librarians and archivists? Foreign ones?
+ScienceNinjaDude
Somehow I doubt that interest in youtube videos counts as an important asset :) But thanks anyway!
Fantastic serie of videos.
❤Thank you very much Dr Lincoln
Polykarp kusch is an amazing name I agree
Also thanks for the bids they cool
Dear Don; no, this is not a dear John letter. In one of the many Feynman lectures, he defines space as; “a set of dots in a cubic array”. How is this possible? How are this so-called “dots” suppose to be physically connected? In the case of a set of 12 lines in a cubic array where the 3D pattern of the 12 lines is space; not the volume (the inside of the cube), the lines are connected
I think in his visualisation of this cubic arrayic space, the particles or quantum fluctuations warp from one dot to another. The maximum speed at which this warping can take place is at light speed, which is questionable since warping should happen instantly. Sorry I contradicted myself which is why I am not fine
great video. Do you, or any viewer, know of a code sample that does the first calculation? thanks
"This is crazy accurate." I'd like to have that on a t-shirt.
While it may be modeled as a spinning sphere, there is no explanation of what it is, that is spherical, or why it'd be stable as a sphere, or how long it takes to become spherical after it's been created... When I've tried answering that sort of question, I find some interesting answers that have lain fallow since more than a century ago; Physics is slow learning...
Just out of curiosity , doesn't it seem that the spinning electron has a positive charge ??
Great as always!
great video guys!
Love your videos guys.
Hello Dr., have you validated yourself their calculations? There are people questioning the predictions.
Great great series. thank you so much. fascinating and fun.
Fan of Dr.Lincoln
What do you mean by a half spin?
Sir, need one complete proof of QCD computations using Feynmann rules and diagrams for multiparticle interactions. How could I get it?
Great job fermil lab
Can anyome. Recommend a book about QCD
I read QED by Feynman and it was amazing
Now QCD
I love your videos! Thank you so much for my weekly dose of scientific knowledge!
Thank you for the video! I learned a lot.
QED doesnt have other predictions?
4:25 so what happens on the edge of event horizon? one particle comes to existence in our space, other falls into black hole?
That is not possible since the black hole absorbs faster than the speed of light and before the anti matter and matter get separated
Why do you show a spinning electron with a "+" sign for the charge?
+ScienceNinjaDude So did I win something, and if so, is it either spendable, or edible?
Benjamin Franklin, was first, by assigning positive charge to electric current but then physicists reversed the charges.... And then we, re-reverse, the charges by philosophy identifying mass as energy trying to escape its mass trap-leaving a void spot-thus electron current is dipolar-backfilling of positive, space-charge...
3:29 Rounding discrepancy? Measurement is a registration of what you measured (duh?), while a calculative prediction like any calculator will round off the last number, which would mean the prediction is one digit more detailed predicting it will be higher than 4.
5:02 I watched this dude for the first time so not fully initiated into his sense or absense of humor, but this seems to be an oxymoron, so hopefully it is physics-comedy 101. Could anyone direct me at an introdcution video please? ;-)
i got a Question, Will the magnetic moment of an electron differ in a changing gravitational field, logically it seems that a the measurement would differ out in space or near a black hole, anyone know? i propose a magnetic moment experiment on the space station.
I love you so much, mate.
1:18 The tricky part of this comparison is getting an electron mounted on a swivel base.
if particles constantly pop into existance and annihilate each other, why can't we use the resulting energy to charge our ZPMs?
what is a virtual particle?
A virtual particle is a particle that 'exists' within the quantum uncertainty expressed by the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. At a very small time scale the energy of a system is uncertain by an amount large enough to allows new particles to be created. These 'live' only briefly, and the more energetic they are, the sooner they have to 'die'. Nevertheless, during their ephemeral presence they do have some physical effects. In fact all forces (possibly excepting gravity, because we do not yet have a proper quantum theory for it) are the result of exchanging virtual particles.
"type of person who lacks curiosity and refinement." you're cold Dr. Lincoln 😅
u
***** gotta love though. he's just missing the "thug life" treatment
Great Science=MAGIC and TRUTH
what if there's an even better theory that's completely different?
No quarky joke?? Great video.
spin?
Like a in a system with one electron and one proton:
Electron have full spin and proton have no spin the system would sum to 1 full spin?
Electron have half spin, proton having half spin in the opposite direction and the sum
of spin in the system is one?
Electron with no spin and the proton with full spin and the system would have a total
spin of 1?
Electron have a spin of half and the proton having a spin of half and both
are spinning in the same direction and the total spin of the system is zero?
Well, that is not how it works.
First of all both proton and neutron have spin s=1/2.
But anyway, to spin addition in quantum mechanics. (At least before the second quantization, which I have not yet studied). Here is how it works:
If you add a system with spin (or angular momentum) of say s1 and another with spin s2, then you will have a new spin of {s1+s2, s1+s2-1, ..., |s1-s2| }. This means that you will have a system that has S = s1 + s2 with a certain probability, S = s1 + s2 - 1 with another, and so on.
Let's say that you have to fermions with s = 1/2. Then you can have S = 0 and S = 1.
Questions and a answer:
The need to explain how does the magnetic field continue to get emitted as a area over flow force?
Does it help to stay aware it is probable the atoms we see today were the same atoms a million years ago?
Is dark energy/matter something like gravity support in empty Space - building blocks of accumulation logics that would announce some structure happening to a great distance it is finally there?
Is entanglement the logic of every atom, shares the different forces passing at its own level of fill, >>>>>>
including the changes the weather circulation daily/hourly/minutes/secondly excites the atoms and not found with just in place logics the atoms are doing nothing?
So where does the energy come from for flowing support of forces that could be used as energy too?
Noting energy is logically said a excited state that automatically is seeking to gain its neutral state again. (Millions of years logic!)(No friction or resistance to its loss leading.){Space making everything a constant logic.}
The possible rocket fuel:
The Sun's radiation/light emission does 'not' pass through the Earth to the core, thus can not be the source of giving a endless flow to every atom!
But the Sun's gravity 'does' pass through Earth all the way to the opposite side in complete support to logical flow guide of every atom.
The giving of the constant inertia force of the static kind constantly supplied to the every atom no matter where it is located.
Gravity does form the foundation for the atom's different passing forces to either absorb or reflect the force(s), and make use of them {Entanglement properties of many things happening at the same time}!
Otherwise the atom would be bounced of Newton's Law Properties of free flow sharing with any force passing its area!!
Thus showing the inner Earth's atoms are settled with self containment inertia creating the energy reflection properties being in rest as they are.
Thank you very much!
So how is that experiment going to try and see if the universe is a hologram?
Where can I go to see the results?
It is the holographic universe
that Fermilab started some time ago. Thanks for the links, I will look at them. Is Leonard Susskind involved with the Fermilab experiment?
A possible explanation of the dual slit experiment utilizing QED???
1. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
2. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have an associated magnetic field with them.
3. Photons also have an electric component and a magnetic component to them.
4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is going through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
5. Via QED, newly generated photons might occur.
6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. Gives the illusion of a wave particle duality but is not that way in actual reality.
7. As far as a detector is concerned, it probably has an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or lack thereof), with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed.
Just a guess on my part that seems to make sense to me. Would need to be verified to know for sure one way or the other.
youre mah kind of professor
Amazing!
1 11
3:40 i have seen videos where they say all this is baloney
QED works great, QCD unfortunately not so much :-(
Anderson Richard Garcia Patricia Lewis Jose
Can't we just all agree to call the theory Cutie?
you da best doc.
+1
Thanks
Really cool😎
are quarks/antiquarks simply condesations of energy very energenic wanting to return to being a cloud of energy
yes
can do without the eliteism and tribalism
Anderson Ruth Davis Gary Thomas Margaret
Yeah.. that ”unlikely name”...😅🥴.. at least He seem to been a great guy... thats crazy accurate👋🏼😌🇸🇪
"You're my kinda people.". LOL yes... yes I am :)
5:01 my professors calls it a mistake
I hope i can in some way inspire some of you with my music! been 15 years in this game so far! @deadheathiphop
Martin David Garcia Michael Martin Sharon
Moore John Smith Patricia Walker Edward
Thompson Sharon Jackson Margaret Gonzalez Jason
Gonzalez Deborah Robinson Charles Thompson Dorothy
Jones Donna Lewis Robert Clark Linda
We are all part of the divine Source. There is NO separation. Only Truth. Peace.
Quantum Foam!!! WTFhysics!
i love this channel! more more more more more!
also, wear some bowties... kids love bowties... bowties are cool
That's an awful lot of self-confirmation for a theory that does not abide by the basic rules of mathematics.
external confirmation is not really 'self-confirmation' is it? all it tells us is that our mathematics of divergence is incomplete, kind of amazing that science could still lead mathematics places even though math has become so far developed beyond our idea of the world.../
Yeah I know all about it. I Also know that if you drop a decimal off the end of the prediction/measurement they will equal the same. Try it out yourself. I Do it all the time in labs. I put on a white coat and take all kinds of measurements. Yeah, I built s time machine too. Everybody tells me its a time capsule and I keep telling them its the same thing. I've been to the future too. It's nice there. TH-cam comments are where all physics get worked out and we froze the sun bc global warming was killing penguins. No flying cars though. Horse and cart was proven to be the most eco friendly mode of transportation and oceans were drained to allow free passage between continents on horse backs. The fish were relocated to the swimming pools of rich people where they were neglected and poisoned with pool additives and chlorine until every species of aquatic life form was wiped from existence. Sea fish are replaced by robotic land sharks that roam the dried ocean floor, in the lawless desert between continents. Few of the mutated humans that populate the sea floors live through an encounter with a land shark. Cats are very popular too.
:)
Not everything is as it seems - Quantum Electrodynamics is rotten at the core (TH-cam)
precise - not accurate
Jones Anthony Harris Ronald Hall William