Hi, I hope you’re still reading comments 😅. In your video about the whole world vs the sp500, you mention that investing in both seemed a little odd due to the overlap of stocks and the higher fees from one. How do you reconcile the issue that the same applies to investing in nas and the sp500. Love your videos.
Thanks for the question and yes, I am 😉 I like the US exposure because I believe in the long-term strength of the US economy. I hold both because the S&P 500 gives me broad exposure, while the Nasdaq-100 lets me double down on tech, which I’m bullish on. Despite the overlap, I’m fine with it-it aligns with my goals. Appreciate you watching. Cheers
@@SmartMoneywithKai nice one. I’m painfully aware that I’m what Buffett referred to as a no nothing, but I feel the same as you on the US and Tech. I know that no matter how obsessively I read and learn about this whole subject of world stock markets and US markets, I’ll never really be up to speed like the professional. I don’t want to be second guessing because consistency and a long time horizon are the only things I know increase my chances.
Hi and yes, expense ratio is indeed important but I would not say the most important. You can have a TER of 0.01% which would be amazing, but if your ETF returns you 1% it defeats the purpose of why you invested in it in the first place so for me I prefer to look at total net return after fees which historically NASDAQ has outperformed the S&P in that regard. Cheers
Hi and great question. Both approaches have their merits. If you're looking at Nasdaq 100 + S&P 500, you're doubling down on U.S. markets, with a strong tech focus from Nasdaq. It’s growth-heavy but lacks diversification beyond the U.S. On the other hand, the S&P 500 + FTSE Europe + Emerging Markets ETF gives you more geographic diversification, spreading risk across different economies, which can be beneficial during periods of U.S. underperformance. This approach is more balanced across sectors and regions. Ultimately, it depends on your risk tolerance and investment goals. If you're after high growth and are bullish on U.S. tech, Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 could be a strong combo. For broader, more balanced exposure, the second option makes sense. Hope this helps. Cheers 👋
Super tempting to have QQQ and S&P 500, not gonna lie. I already have 50% in S&P 500 and 50% in Invesco FTSE All-World, which gives me around 80% US and 20% International exposure. My plan is to rebalance periodically to reach a 60% US / 40% International allocation by retirement, aligning closely with FTSE All-World's allocation, I keep thinking about adding some QQQ, but since my strategy is to buy and hold until retirement, I’m cautious about the volatility of tech stocks. A possible strategy would be to shift QQQ into fixed-income, bonds, or a high-dividend yield ETF when I retire, though that might trigger a big tax event depending on the tax rules at the time
Hi mate, your current allocation is already quite solid, especially with a balanced 80/20 split between US and International exposure. Adding QQQ is tempting because of its growth potential, but you're right to be cautious about the volatility, especially since your strategy is buy-and-hold until retirement. One approach could be to allocate a smaller, "satellite" portion to QQQ-maybe around 5-10%-so you can enjoy the tech growth without overwhelming your core portfolio's stability. That way, you maintain a mostly diversified approach while having a bit of exposure to tech's upside. Your idea of shifting into fixed-income or high-dividend ETFs at retirement makes sense, but as you mentioned, tax implications are a major factor. Cheers 👋
Has you know I also investing on Nasdaq100 but in the Amundi Acc Ucits ETF. A little bit cheaper but also a lot smaller fund size. But I also mixing my monthly investment with an MSCI World tech information, broader by region but also sector restricted. I think that combined with the S&P500 is the best aproach these days. What your thoughts on that?
Hi Pedro 👋 Sounds like you've got a well-structured strategy going. The Amundi Acc UCITS ETF is definitely a good, cost-effective way to get that Nasdaq100 exposure, even if the fund size is smaller. Mixing it up with MSCI World Tech gives you a nice diversification across regions while still keeping that tech focus, which complements the S&P 500 nicely. For me personally, I think it's a great ETF, but it’s worth noting that it has about 90% US tech, so there's quite a bit of overlap with Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500. Plus, the fact that it's a "World" ETF but doesn't include China and South Korea-two major tech powerhouses-is a bit surprising. Despite that, the results of the ETF so far have been great. I think your combination gives you both growth from tech and a broader safety net from S&P 500's stability. As long as you’re comfortable with the higher tech allocation, it seems like a solid approach for today's market dynamics. Balancing those growth opportunities while having some stability is key. Cheers
Great video man and glad to see you getting on board the Nasdaq! I personally only hold the NASDAQ and VUSA ETFs and i’m never selling them!! Ride or die🚀😂
Historically it outperforms, but in the last 3 years they are even. Since ETF investing really took off in these last few years it makes sense that fewer people mention it. Also the fee is very high.
Indeed, S&P has been doing tremendously well last few years, as I mentioned in the video, becoming more and more tech heavy, since the similar returns. I still want an extra exposure to Tech so I am happy to have more of that ETF in my portfolio but as I also mentioned, majority of my ETF holdings will continue to be S&P 500 👌
added the nasdaq 100 along side my ftse all world couple weeks ago, just seems like an extra risk for reward for big growth in my portfolio definitely holding nasdaq long term
@@SmartMoneywithKai thanks my whole pie consists of all world 70%, nasdaq 100 15%, physical gold 10% and clean energy etf 5%, still a little unsure on the allocation but it should be fine
Your allocation looks solid. Having 70% in an All-World ETF gives you great diversification across regions and sectors, which is a strong foundation. The 15% in Nasdaq 100 adds some growth potential, while the 10% in physical gold offers a hedge against market downturns. Clean energy is a nice touch for exposure to a growing sector. Fine-tuning over time is perfectly normal as you assess how comfortable you are with the mix. Looks like you're on the right track 👌
Hi Kai, found on IBKR the SXRV etf I think it's similar to yours! Question, what is your opinion regarding the P/E ratio of the nasdaq being around 40? Isn't it too expensive?
Hey there, awesome find with SXRV! This is actually the same ETF I buy; I just buy it in USD on the London Stock Exchange. As for the high P/E ratio on the NASDAQ, that’s pretty normal given its focus on high-growth tech. These companies are typically valued at a premium because of their potential for rapid expansion. High P/E ratios come with the territory, especially when it comes to sectors that are scaling quickly. So yes, I am totally fine with it 👌
Thanks a lot 🙌 To reduce the withholding tax on U.S. stocks from 30% to 15% as a European investor, you need to fill out a W-8BEN form through your broker. This form allows you to benefit from tax treaties between the U.S. and many European countries, reducing the tax on dividends from U.S. stocks to 15%. The form is usually straightforward, and most brokers offer an easy way to submit it online. Make sure to check with your broker for specific instructions. Hope that helps. Cheers
danke für deinen content. ich als bitcoin maxi werde wahrscheinlich ein bisschen in den s&p 500 investieren und auch nasdaq 100. 😀beim s&p 500 hab ich gesehen dass spdr den günstigsten hat. wie findest du den mit 0.03 TER? ist von state street.
Vielen Dank und sehr gern 🙌 Bin auch Bitcoin Maxi 😉 Und ja, genau den S&P ETF for State Street hab ich auch, SPY5 mit 0.03%, love it, as cheap as it gets 😉 LG 👋
@@SmartMoneywithKai finde ich geil dass wir genau gleich denken mit 🇺🇸s&p and nasdaq and bitcoin. 💪🏻hast du in demfall 2 s&p 500 wo du besparst? den vanguard und spdr? grüsse aus der schweiz
Sehr cool und ja hatte den Vanguard aber hab die Position dann geschlossen und alles in SPDR (SPY5) gesteckt 👌 LG zurueck in die schoene Schwiez, hab selber in Luzern und Genf gelebt, super dort.
Nice one 👌 Wenn mein portfolio weiter so waechst und da mal ein paar Millionen zusammen kommen kann ich mir sogar vielleicht eines Tages ein kleines Studio in Zuerich leisten 😂 Mega Stadt 💯 LG 👋
Usually it's not in your name but in the end of broker default, usually it's kept in segregated accounts under your name so it would eventually be liquidated or passed to another broker under your name so you would retain the rights to those fractions. Cheers
I’m happy that you considered adding the NASDAQ in your portfolio 🎉. I think we have spoken about it many months ago in a live stream you did. I personally have a 70% Nasdaq100 30% S&P500 strategy that i DCA into the last 3 years, with an investment horizon of 20 years. I also added one single stock ASML (to create a small Europe exposure) with an overall portfolio weight under 5% for the next 5 years. Cheers!🥂
Hi and thanks 🙌 Yes, took me a while to pull the trigger on it but happy I eventually did. I might do 70/30% as well but probably the other way around 😉 ASML is a solid pick for Europe exposure-semiconductors are crucial for the future, and adding it under 5% keeps it a nice complement without overloading your portfolio. Love how you’re thinking long term and sticking to your strategy. Cheers mate 👋
While it's tempting to add Nasdaq to our portfolios, I believe it introduces unnecessary risk for long-term investors. The S&P 500 is already heavily weighted in tech, so adding more exposure through Nasdaq could result in over-concentration. Personally, I prefer broader diversification by investing in the entire market, like with the FTSE All-World
Personally, I’ve chosen a more concentrated approach as I’m comfortable taking on higher risk, but by all means, this isn’t for everyone. A global ETF like the FTSE All-World, as you mentioned, might be a much better option in your case, providing broader diversification and reducing sector-specific risks. Cheers
Hi, if you live in Europe either Trading 212 smartmoneywithkai.com/trading212 or Lightyear smartmoneywithkai.com/lightyear if you live outside Europe, try eToro med.etoro.com/B12087_A122937_TClick_Syt.aspx I use all of them and really enjoy them 👌
Hi and yes, unfortunately for now they do not offer that, like a number of other brokers unfortunately, that's why I personally use a number of different brokers myself. Some do, some don't. But like Trading 212 they also never did, but recently added that feature, so hopefully they might add it one day as well. Cheers
⚡ ALL MY FAVOURITE TOOLS
smartmoneywithkai.com/tools
Hi, I hope you’re still reading comments 😅. In your video about the whole world vs the sp500, you mention that investing in both seemed a little odd due to the overlap of stocks and the higher fees from one. How do you reconcile the issue that the same applies to investing in nas and the sp500.
Love your videos.
Thanks for the question and yes, I am 😉 I like the US exposure because I believe in the long-term strength of the US economy. I hold both because the S&P 500 gives me broad exposure, while the Nasdaq-100 lets me double down on tech, which I’m bullish on. Despite the overlap, I’m fine with it-it aligns with my goals. Appreciate you watching. Cheers
@@SmartMoneywithKai nice one. I’m painfully aware that I’m what Buffett referred to as a no nothing, but I feel the same as you on the US and Tech. I know that no matter how obsessively I read and learn about this whole subject of world stock markets and US markets, I’ll never really be up to speed like the professional. I don’t want to be second guessing because consistency and a long time horizon are the only things I know increase my chances.
For me, buying QQQ is just buying the same large and mega cap names at a higher price. Expense ratio is (still) the most crucial thing in investing.
Hi and yes, expense ratio is indeed important but I would not say the most important. You can have a TER of 0.01% which would be amazing, but if your ETF returns you 1% it defeats the purpose of why you invested in it in the first place so for me I prefer to look at total net return after fees which historically NASDAQ has outperformed the S&P in that regard. Cheers
Hey Kai, what do you think of diversifying with nasdaq 100 and sp500 vs sp500/ftse europe/emerging markets etf? Thanks
Hi and great question. Both approaches have their merits. If you're looking at Nasdaq 100 + S&P 500, you're doubling down on U.S. markets, with a strong tech focus from Nasdaq. It’s growth-heavy but lacks diversification beyond the U.S.
On the other hand, the S&P 500 + FTSE Europe + Emerging Markets ETF gives you more geographic diversification, spreading risk across different economies, which can be beneficial during periods of U.S. underperformance. This approach is more balanced across sectors and regions.
Ultimately, it depends on your risk tolerance and investment goals. If you're after high growth and are bullish on U.S. tech, Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 could be a strong combo. For broader, more balanced exposure, the second option makes sense. Hope this helps. Cheers 👋
Super tempting to have QQQ and S&P 500, not gonna lie. I already have 50% in S&P 500 and 50% in Invesco FTSE All-World, which gives me around 80% US and 20% International exposure. My plan is to rebalance periodically to reach a 60% US / 40% International allocation by retirement, aligning closely with FTSE All-World's allocation,
I keep thinking about adding some QQQ, but since my strategy is to buy and hold until retirement, I’m cautious about the volatility of tech stocks. A possible strategy would be to shift QQQ into fixed-income, bonds, or a high-dividend yield ETF when I retire, though that might trigger a big tax event depending on the tax rules at the time
Hi mate, your current allocation is already quite solid, especially with a balanced 80/20 split between US and International exposure. Adding QQQ is tempting because of its growth potential, but you're right to be cautious about the volatility, especially since your strategy is buy-and-hold until retirement.
One approach could be to allocate a smaller, "satellite" portion to QQQ-maybe around 5-10%-so you can enjoy the tech growth without overwhelming your core portfolio's stability. That way, you maintain a mostly diversified approach while having a bit of exposure to tech's upside.
Your idea of shifting into fixed-income or high-dividend ETFs at retirement makes sense, but as you mentioned, tax implications are a major factor. Cheers 👋
@@SmartMoneywithKai "maybe around 5-10%"
Has you know I also investing on Nasdaq100 but in the Amundi Acc Ucits ETF. A little bit cheaper but also a lot smaller fund size. But I also mixing my monthly investment with an MSCI World tech information, broader by region but also sector restricted. I think that combined with the S&P500 is the best aproach these days. What your thoughts on that?
Hi Pedro 👋 Sounds like you've got a well-structured strategy going. The Amundi Acc UCITS ETF is definitely a good, cost-effective way to get that Nasdaq100 exposure, even if the fund size is smaller. Mixing it up with MSCI World Tech gives you a nice diversification across regions while still keeping that tech focus, which complements the S&P 500 nicely.
For me personally, I think it's a great ETF, but it’s worth noting that it has about 90% US tech, so there's quite a bit of overlap with Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500. Plus, the fact that it's a "World" ETF but doesn't include China and South Korea-two major tech powerhouses-is a bit surprising. Despite that, the results of the ETF so far have been great.
I think your combination gives you both growth from tech and a broader safety net from S&P 500's stability. As long as you’re comfortable with the higher tech allocation, it seems like a solid approach for today's market dynamics. Balancing those growth opportunities while having some stability is key. Cheers
Great video man and glad to see you getting on board the Nasdaq! I personally only hold the NASDAQ and VUSA ETFs and i’m never selling them!! Ride or die🚀😂
Ciao Luka, great to hear that mate and yes, happy to finally have pulled the trigger on them. Which Nasdaq 100 ETF exactly are you buying?
@@SmartMoneywithKai I’m with the SXRV, trading on the German Exchange😁
Nice one, so we went with the same ETF then 💪
Historically it outperforms, but in the last 3 years they are even. Since ETF investing really took off in these last few years it makes sense that fewer people mention it. Also the fee is very high.
Indeed, S&P has been doing tremendously well last few years, as I mentioned in the video, becoming more and more tech heavy, since the similar returns. I still want an extra exposure to Tech so I am happy to have more of that ETF in my portfolio but as I also mentioned, majority of my ETF holdings will continue to be S&P 500 👌
added the nasdaq 100 along side my ftse all world couple weeks ago, just seems like an extra risk for reward for big growth in my portfolio definitely holding nasdaq long term
Love it and great core holding for stability with a little satellite holding for extra returns 👌
@@SmartMoneywithKai thanks my whole pie consists of all world 70%, nasdaq 100 15%, physical gold 10% and clean energy etf 5%, still a little unsure on the allocation but it should be fine
Your allocation looks solid. Having 70% in an All-World ETF gives you great diversification across regions and sectors, which is a strong foundation. The 15% in Nasdaq 100 adds some growth potential, while the 10% in physical gold offers a hedge against market downturns. Clean energy is a nice touch for exposure to a growing sector. Fine-tuning over time is perfectly normal as you assess how comfortable you are with the mix. Looks like you're on the right track 👌
@@SmartMoneywithKai Thanks mate really appreciate the time to read thru my comment
I'm also investing in both the S&P500 and the Nasdaq100.
Nice one 😉👌
Hi Kai, found on IBKR the SXRV etf I think it's similar to yours! Question, what is your opinion regarding the P/E ratio of the nasdaq being around 40? Isn't it too expensive?
Hey there, awesome find with SXRV! This is actually the same ETF I buy; I just buy it in USD on the London Stock Exchange.
As for the high P/E ratio on the NASDAQ, that’s pretty normal given its focus on high-growth tech. These companies are typically valued at a premium because of their potential for rapid expansion. High P/E ratios come with the territory, especially when it comes to sectors that are scaling quickly. So yes, I am totally fine with it 👌
Another great video thanks. i want to ask what is the procedure to pay 15% (instead of 30%) tax when buying US. stocks for Europeans?
Thanks a lot 🙌 To reduce the withholding tax on U.S. stocks from 30% to 15% as a European investor, you need to fill out a W-8BEN form through your broker. This form allows you to benefit from tax treaties between the U.S. and many European countries, reducing the tax on dividends from U.S. stocks to 15%. The form is usually straightforward, and most brokers offer an easy way to submit it online. Make sure to check with your broker for specific instructions. Hope that helps. Cheers
@@SmartMoneywithKai Many thanks!
danke für deinen content. ich als bitcoin maxi werde wahrscheinlich ein bisschen in den s&p 500 investieren und auch nasdaq 100. 😀beim s&p 500 hab ich gesehen dass spdr den günstigsten hat. wie findest du den mit 0.03 TER? ist von state street.
Vielen Dank und sehr gern 🙌 Bin auch Bitcoin Maxi 😉 Und ja, genau den S&P ETF for State Street hab ich auch, SPY5 mit 0.03%, love it, as cheap as it gets 😉 LG 👋
@@SmartMoneywithKai finde ich geil dass wir genau gleich denken mit 🇺🇸s&p and nasdaq and bitcoin. 💪🏻hast du in demfall 2 s&p 500 wo du besparst? den vanguard und spdr? grüsse aus der schweiz
Sehr cool und ja hatte den Vanguard aber hab die Position dann geschlossen und alles in SPDR (SPY5) gesteckt 👌 LG zurueck in die schoene Schwiez, hab selber in Luzern und Genf gelebt, super dort.
@@SmartMoneywithKai ich gehe auch auf den spdr:-) ah cool. ja luzern finde ich auch mega schön. bin aus zürich. beste grüsse💪🏻
Nice one 👌 Wenn mein portfolio weiter so waechst und da mal ein paar Millionen zusammen kommen kann ich mir sogar vielleicht eines Tages ein kleines Studio in Zuerich leisten 😂 Mega Stadt 💯 LG 👋
The fraction of share belong lo you or to the bank?
Usually it's not in your name but in the end of broker default, usually it's kept in segregated accounts under your name so it would eventually be liquidated or passed to another broker under your name so you would retain the rights to those fractions. Cheers
I’m happy that you considered adding the NASDAQ in your portfolio 🎉. I think we have spoken about it many months ago in a live stream you did. I personally have a 70% Nasdaq100 30% S&P500 strategy that i DCA into the last 3 years, with an investment horizon of 20 years.
I also added one single stock ASML (to create a small Europe exposure) with an overall portfolio weight under 5% for the next 5 years.
Cheers!🥂
Hi and thanks 🙌 Yes, took me a while to pull the trigger on it but happy I eventually did. I might do 70/30% as well but probably the other way around 😉
ASML is a solid pick for Europe exposure-semiconductors are crucial for the future, and adding it under 5% keeps it a nice complement without overloading your portfolio. Love how you’re thinking long term and sticking to your strategy. Cheers mate 👋
While it's tempting to add Nasdaq to our portfolios, I believe it introduces unnecessary risk for long-term investors. The S&P 500 is already heavily weighted in tech, so adding more exposure through Nasdaq could result in over-concentration. Personally, I prefer broader diversification by investing in the entire market, like with the FTSE All-World
Personally, I’ve chosen a more concentrated approach as I’m comfortable taking on higher risk, but by all means, this isn’t for everyone. A global ETF like the FTSE All-World, as you mentioned, might be a much better option in your case, providing broader diversification and reducing sector-specific risks. Cheers
What best investment platform for beginners to start?
Hi, if you live in Europe either Trading 212 smartmoneywithkai.com/trading212 or Lightyear smartmoneywithkai.com/lightyear if you live outside Europe, try eToro med.etoro.com/B12087_A122937_TClick_Syt.aspx I use all of them and really enjoy them 👌
I hear that etoro u r not gonna be able to tranfer ur portafolio to another broker. is it true?
Hi and yes, unfortunately for now they do not offer that, like a number of other brokers unfortunately, that's why I personally use a number of different brokers myself. Some do, some don't. But like Trading 212 they also never did, but recently added that feature, so hopefully they might add it one day as well. Cheers
Nice video I will consider putting a 10% of my investment the next time 👌🏻
Thanks a lot mate and sounds like a smart choice 👌
I'm buying xnas. It's cheaper. Also buying 3qqq leveraged qqq x3. It is very risky but...;)
It is indeed cheaper, was also looking at it, great pick, but maybe because I am German I am not a fan of Deutsche Bank who issues Xtrackers 😉
Just added nasdaq100? Better late than never bro 😂😂
Hi mate, yeah I guess so :) But still a solid 40+ years of compounding left so I should be ok 😉 Cheers