Are you really sure? Or could you, in fact, be missing the asian guy WITHOUT glasses? I'm just making sure cuz it would be sooo embarrassing if it was the wrong asian guy we were talking about here, cuz been there, done that! I just hate it when I miss the wrong asian guy 😭
The notion that the universe existed before the Big Bang is an intriguing hypothesis that could reshape our understanding of cosmology. If proof can substantiate this theory, it would imply that the Big Bang wasn't the absolute beginning but rather a transition in the universe's existence. Concepts like cyclic models, quantum gravity, or multiverse theories might offer insights into this pre-Big Bang state. Exploring this further could unlock deeper mysteries about the nature of time, space, and the origins of everything we know.
I have always felt like our current universe is transient, that it won't stay the same forever, at some point another big bang will occur and a whole new universe will be produced, but I do think remnants of the previous universe will indeed come through into the new universe
Just the fact the concept is highly controversial and not well-accepted by cosmologists is, based on the history of cosmology, almost proof of its veracity. If nothing else, the history of science teaches that groupthink always gets destroyed.
I think its a futile exercise trying to understand the stretch or the origin of the Universe. It doesn't even make sense to say the Universe has an origin...If the rationale is that there was an explosion that presided to form the Universe, then it means there was already the existence of the space the exploding galactic bodies started spreading on. That explosion couldn't have happened in isolation. What even baffles me the most is how useless it is have trillions of lifeless celestial bodies (planets) hanging in space, just oozing off volcanoes, radiation & hostile gases.
1:08 the evidence for it is really quite strong the strength of the signal we see is a 99.98% confidence level which is pretty strong single black hole gradually swallows most of the cluster all that energy bursts through onto the other side 1:28 TTRI says (9/14/2024): As we know 3 dimensional realm ( 3°Φ3° ) is world the concrete resulted from quantum decoherence in Dirac sea (40%), known as 4°||2° spacetime which is now acceleratingly expanded by the dark energy (60%). There're three types of inflationary big bangs. The first generates 6°∩0° spacetime, the background for all the whole; the second from type-II inflationary big bang (IFBB-II), and with type-III inflationary big bang, Dirac sea (40%) has formed and the left energy (60%) drives our unvierse expands accelertingly and forms the univeral buffer zone ( 5°|1° spacetime ) between the background ( 6°∩0° spacetime ) and Dirac Sea ( 4°||2° spacetime ). TTRI says (9/13/2024): Three universal principles exist there, entropy growing, life evolving, and infinite self-similarity. Cosmological Model of Bible (CMB) has detailed Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC, th-cam.com/video/Jl-iyuSw9KM/w-d-xo.html ): 1. Metaverse is represented as a set of 7 natural numbers: N {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, where 1 is the fundamental reality or ( Stuff of God, pg 17 in Genesis, Zen and Quantum Physics A Fresh Look at the Theology and Science of Creation, by Jeff A Benner). The one generates 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, in other words, in the set other numbers evolves from the one. 2. Metaverse was under the principle of entropy growing, 3 the second prime was big-ripped to 1/3, the type-II inflationary big bang, which immediately made an ultimate chaos, and simultaniouly initiated the 2nd round evolution based on the 1/3 as the stuff of anti-God (the buiding blocks), produced very early massive black holes. 3. The universal principle eventually works on 5 the last prime in the set, the type-III inflationary big bang follows, instead of 1/3 the 1/5 now becomes the stuff of God, creating the evolutionary process described in Genesis 1 & 2. 6. Conclusion: The distribution of informational energy is Dirac Sea (40%) and Dark Energy (60%) in the universe, which has neither starting nor terminating point, being driven spirally forward evolution that cyclically experiences infinite beginnings and endings forever and ever.
@@BeeyondIdeas I won't say exactly according to the CCC. But but but... Our ancient Hindu texts have a mention of 4 yugas, namely Satyayuga, Tretayuga, Dwaparyuga and the Kaliyuga. So it goes on to say that this is like a cycle meaning, after Kaliyuga, the world will come to an end. (The avatar of God descends to destroy the evil) and subsequently Satyayuga will begin, wherein Dharma will be established (righteousness). So if you notice, there is some similarity in the theory portrayed in this video. I won't force you, but if you have any interest in any of this, this is fascinating to refer to.
@@Hahhahabba Naah the logic of Yugas can't be applied here. As all Yugas were one after the other and they haven't culminated in any form of destruction and rebuild. And what comes after the Big Bang (Kali Yuga) is being talked about in this video. Our scriptures don't say anything about what comes after. A New World, well that's understandable. Better to separate scriptures and hard science from each other.
@Hahhahabba Umm did you not watch the whole video? The premise is that the cyclic cosmology isn’t the widely accepted model of the universe. So I think it doesn’t align with your belief, yet you said "That's what it's said.."
Great video. The only thing I'd clarify more is the part after 12:30. Although every configuration is possible in theory, in practice some are far less probable than others. So improbable that they're technically impossible to happen twice, unless the universe is truly infinite in both space and amount of matter. For example, configurations forming the same rock would repeat far, far more often than configurations creating the same tree. 99.99999...9% of the duplicates would be the objects that don't require extraordinary complexity (rocks, ice, liquids etc...).
The univers exist because there is an other existence in crystal like shape were very smart energetic entities thought about it and created it with the buildingblocks out of infinity. So Easy . People with a NDE know that there is another world in another frequency ……there came your univers from. 🤷♀️
Before big Banks, there could be small ATMs 🤷♂️ On a serious note, it doesn’t matter what I think. Science must follow the evidence, wherever it leads.
@@learndesignwithdev Thanks, I have seen this reference before where it is stated like multiple observable universes. Some people tend to state it as if the observable universe is the universe in total and anything beyond is a separate universe. Or to put it another way there could be many observable universes within the total size of our universe but I would consider all to be in the same universe. Always seams ambiguous lately lol
This theory is only known because he was already famous deservedly when he came out with it. His conformal theory and his consciousness theory with microtubles is ridiculous as every cell in your body has those microtubules. . . Not just neurons
Studying stuff matters. Even if things are always improving/ disproving. The process lead us to virtually Everything in modern tech depends on the discovery and understanding of nuclei of atoms and electromagnetism.
😂and that genius is not scientist. The concept he disproves is a benchmark that is currently known. So we can have destined one who we will call god after trillion iterations like this..
These endless assumptions are baseless and against the laws of the universe. Even If humans wud have been the Gods of the universe, they cud never have predicted this contraction and by billion years no one will ever survive to take note of what Panrose says today
An eon isn’t a universe…it’s a period of time (a cycle) of a universe. Please, please please learn what Penrose is talking about before you creates videos in a sad money grab.
We did study it, and frankly this just shows your ignorance. Check the paper at 2:36, "CCC replaces inflation” by the lambda-driven expotential expansion of a pre-big bang universe epoch = a previous aeon.” And to settle this once and for all: "The conformal infinity of each aeon joins conformally and smoothly to the conformally expanded Big Bang origin of the subsequent aeon." This means each aeon starts with the Big Bang and ends with exponential expansion" - a universe, in simple terms. PS: It’s "Aeon," not "Eon.”
Use code BEEYONDIDEAS at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/beeyondideas
The narrator in the video " There's a creator's aim in this universe ft Roger penrose" was very fascinating, incredible voice.
Thank you, do you like this one as well?
Tbh not more than the other one
@@BeeyondIdeas looks like you're gonna have to up your game dude, Amy's not impressed ;)
JK obviously, great vid, thank you
Thank you Brian Greene 😎
I miss the Asian guy with glasses
👀🥲
Are you really sure? Or could you, in fact, be missing the asian guy WITHOUT glasses? I'm just making sure cuz it would be sooo embarrassing if it was the wrong asian guy we were talking about here, cuz been there, done that! I just hate it when I miss the wrong asian guy 😭
Nice work on transitioning the ad read for Incogni in there. I saw it coming, but still… nice work 😂
🤓
The notion that the universe existed before the Big Bang is an intriguing hypothesis that could reshape our understanding of cosmology. If proof can substantiate this theory, it would imply that the Big Bang wasn't the absolute beginning but rather a transition in the universe's existence. Concepts like cyclic models, quantum gravity, or multiverse theories might offer insights into this pre-Big Bang state. Exploring this further could unlock deeper mysteries about the nature of time, space, and the origins of everything we know.
I have always felt like our current universe is transient, that it won't stay the same forever, at some point another big bang will occur and a whole new universe will be produced, but I do think remnants of the previous universe will indeed come through into the new universe
Just the fact the concept is highly controversial and not well-accepted by cosmologists is, based on the history of cosmology, almost proof of its veracity. If nothing else, the history of science teaches that groupthink always gets destroyed.
Agree
Before the Big Bang there was a Little Bang, how hard is that to figure out.
Love the video
I think we're so far away from understanding the universe, any pre-bigbang theory is just fiction or a nice philosophical thought at best.
I think its a futile exercise trying to understand the stretch or the origin of the Universe. It doesn't even make sense to say the Universe has an origin...If the rationale is that there was an explosion that presided to form the Universe, then it means there was already the existence of the space the exploding galactic bodies started spreading on. That explosion couldn't have happened in isolation.
What even baffles me the most is how useless it is have trillions of lifeless celestial bodies (planets) hanging in space, just oozing off volcanoes, radiation & hostile gases.
Could this be why we see such massive SMBHs so early on? It would explain where they came from. So i think it's definitely worth looking into further.
Regard from "Cloud and rain model universe". .. 🙏🙏
Awareness is known by awareness alone.
1:08 the evidence for it is really quite strong the strength of the signal we see is a 99.98% confidence level which is pretty strong single black hole gradually swallows most of the cluster all that energy bursts through onto the other side 1:28
TTRI says (9/14/2024): As we know 3 dimensional realm ( 3°Φ3° ) is world the concrete resulted from quantum decoherence in Dirac sea (40%), known as 4°||2° spacetime which is now acceleratingly expanded by the dark energy (60%). There're three types of inflationary big bangs. The first generates 6°∩0° spacetime, the background for all the whole; the second from type-II inflationary big bang (IFBB-II), and with type-III inflationary big bang, Dirac sea (40%) has formed and the left energy (60%) drives our unvierse expands accelertingly and forms the univeral buffer zone ( 5°|1° spacetime ) between the background ( 6°∩0° spacetime ) and Dirac Sea ( 4°||2° spacetime ).
TTRI says (9/13/2024): Three universal principles exist there, entropy growing, life evolving, and infinite self-similarity. Cosmological Model of Bible (CMB) has detailed Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC, th-cam.com/video/Jl-iyuSw9KM/w-d-xo.html ): 1. Metaverse is represented as a set of 7 natural numbers: N {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, where 1 is the fundamental reality or ( Stuff of God, pg 17 in Genesis, Zen and Quantum Physics A Fresh Look at the Theology and Science of Creation, by Jeff A Benner). The one generates 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, in other words, in the set other numbers evolves from the one. 2. Metaverse was under the principle of entropy growing, 3 the second prime was big-ripped to 1/3, the type-II inflationary big bang, which immediately made an ultimate chaos, and simultaniouly initiated the 2nd round evolution based on the 1/3 as the stuff of anti-God (the buiding blocks), produced very early massive black holes. 3. The universal principle eventually works on 5 the last prime in the set, the type-III inflationary big bang follows, instead of 1/3 the 1/5 now becomes the stuff of God, creating the evolutionary process described in Genesis 1 & 2.
6. Conclusion: The distribution of informational energy is Dirac Sea (40%) and Dark Energy (60%) in the universe, which has neither starting nor terminating point, being driven spirally forward evolution that cyclically experiences infinite beginnings and endings forever and ever.
Continue watching the rest of the video 😎
i don't see a crunch. i see many bangs within the MotherVerse
It has no beginning it has no end.
You have be careful the interference pattern seen can be an illusion
Thats what is said in Hinduism. We believe in four YUGAS
So tell me, what's the intrepretation of the universe according to hinduism? Most importantly, is it in accordance with CCC, or not really?
@@BeeyondIdeas I won't say exactly according to the CCC. But but but... Our ancient Hindu texts have a mention of 4 yugas, namely Satyayuga, Tretayuga, Dwaparyuga and the Kaliyuga. So it goes on to say that this is like a cycle meaning, after Kaliyuga, the world will come to an end. (The avatar of God descends to destroy the evil) and subsequently Satyayuga will begin, wherein Dharma will be established (righteousness). So if you notice, there is some similarity in the theory portrayed in this video.
I won't force you, but if you have any interest in any of this, this is fascinating to refer to.
@@Hahhahabba Naah the logic of Yugas can't be applied here. As all Yugas were one after the other and they haven't culminated in any form of destruction and rebuild.
And what comes after the Big Bang (Kali Yuga) is being talked about in this video. Our scriptures don't say anything about what comes after. A New World, well that's understandable.
Better to separate scriptures and hard science from each other.
@Hahhahabba Umm did you not watch the whole video? The premise is that the cyclic cosmology isn’t the widely accepted model of the universe. So I think it doesn’t align with your belief, yet you said "That's what it's said.."
Great video. The only thing I'd clarify more is the part after 12:30. Although every configuration is possible in theory, in practice some are far less probable than others. So improbable that they're technically impossible to happen twice, unless the universe is truly infinite in both space and amount of matter.
For example, configurations forming the same rock would repeat far, far more often than configurations creating the same tree. 99.99999...9% of the duplicates would be the objects that don't require extraordinary complexity (rocks, ice, liquids etc...).
Thank you, good insight!
Could the universe not be Gods lungs breathing in and out!
@@TheHighlander78 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ could the universe be GOD’S digestive tract ….. shish kebab …… there is no free wheel
The univers exist because there is an other existence in crystal like shape were very smart energetic entities thought about it and created it with the buildingblocks out of infinity. So Easy . People with a NDE know that there is another world in another frequency ……there came your univers from. 🤷♀️
Oo i thought you had to cheagn narroter ❤ can i get heart 😊.
😎
Another big fan of pseudosurrealism
Did the big bang it self blow bubble's.
👌
Did you change narrator?
Yes! But the main production team remains the same 🦾😎
Bro what do you think .
Is really there is something before big bank
Before big Banks, there could be small ATMs 🤷♂️
On a serious note, it doesn’t matter what I think. Science must follow the evidence, wherever it leads.
11:18 Wait. When they talk about multiple universes are the talking about multiple observable universe within the same void expanse?
No, multiple Universes separate from each other, not observable to each other but existing next to each other.
@@learndesignwithdev Thanks, I have seen this reference before where it is stated like multiple observable universes.
Some people tend to state it as if the observable universe is the universe in total and anything beyond is a separate universe.
Or to put it another way there could be many observable universes within the total size of our universe but I would consider all to be in the same universe.
Always seams ambiguous lately lol
This theory is only known because he was already famous deservedly when he came out with it. His conformal theory and his consciousness theory with microtubles is ridiculous as every cell in your body has those microtubules. . . Not just neurons
Frankly who cares. Scientists are always wrong until a genius comes up with a new concept, and then that concept is eventually disproved.
Studying stuff matters. Even if things are always improving/ disproving. The process lead us to virtually Everything in modern tech depends on the discovery and understanding of nuclei of atoms and electromagnetism.
😂and that genius is not scientist. The concept he disproves is a benchmark that is currently known. So we can have destined one who we will call god after trillion iterations like this..
Graham, foff
These endless assumptions are baseless and against the laws of the universe. Even If humans wud have been the Gods of the universe, they cud never have predicted this contraction and by billion years no one will ever survive to take note of what Panrose says today
An eon isn’t a universe…it’s a period of time (a cycle) of a universe. Please, please please learn what Penrose is talking about before you creates videos in a sad money grab.
We did study it, and frankly this just shows your ignorance. Check the paper at 2:36, "CCC replaces inflation” by the lambda-driven expotential expansion of a pre-big bang universe epoch = a previous aeon.”
And to settle this once and for all: "The conformal infinity of each aeon joins conformally and smoothly to the conformally expanded Big Bang origin of the subsequent aeon." This means each aeon starts with the Big Bang and ends with exponential expansion" - a universe, in simple terms.
PS: It’s "Aeon," not "Eon.”
Holy shit never have I seen an ass whooping done so articulately 😂😂😂
Hahaha it’s great when someone’s trying to show how smart they are only to fail so miserably
Damn dude. You got rekt. Delete this and walk the Boo of Shame.
@@apex_prey dam right they got rekt 😂😂😂
Most scientists don't subscribe to the Big Crunch, so this video already got off to a bad start.
Still, I really like Penrise's CCC.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ GOD created the shish kebab and determines everything …… there is no free wheel
Everyone loves shish kebab!
Who created God?
@@ivanmytube ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ MARY
@@99guspuppet8And who created Mary?
@@apex_prey ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ i think it is ouroborian
Regard from "Cloud and rain model universe"... 🙏🙏