sin(3x) & cos(3x), using De Moivre's theorem

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 106

  • @JBaker452
    @JBaker452 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I often do lookup these trig identities from the back of my trig identities book, but I seldom try to demonstrate them.
    I suppose that if I was teaching, I would draw from some the more obscure ones and choose them for demonstration to my class,
    blackpenredpen sure does a good job at this.

  • @MagicGonads
    @MagicGonads 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Ok guys in this video I will have my voice back, isn't it

    • @OonHan
      @OonHan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok guys in this video I will have my whiteboard and markers back, isn't it

    • @KidNamedVashin
      @KidNamedVashin 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Moon man?

  • @jarikosonen4079
    @jarikosonen4079 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes. Try more of this. Make exact sin() and cos() for all the angle at 1° step from 0° to 90° by using this formula.

  • @raghadsan603
    @raghadsan603 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot, it helped me. I was confused about where the 4 comes from. Good explination..

  • @vera453
    @vera453 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Months ago I liked maths but never had an interest for trigonometry, you have changed that, thanks!

  • @sss-ol3dl
    @sss-ol3dl 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, here is a puzzle about finding cos(nx) recursively if you wanted to try it:
    Let fn(x) be a polynomial such that fn(cos(x)) = cos(nx), so for example f1(x) = x, as cos(x) = cos(x).
    Show that f(n+2)(x) = 2x f(n+1)(x) - fn(x), and hence find cos(4x) in terms of cos(x)

  • @matlas___
    @matlas___ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What about using this theorem to provide a formula for say: cos(nθ) and sin(nθ)? Is it possible and if so I'd be intrigued to see you do a video on it! 😊

    • @ikhsantjambolang1305
      @ikhsantjambolang1305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      De Moivre's Theorem : For all integers n, it satisfies: cos(nθ)+ίsin(nθ)=(cosθ+ίsinθ)^n

    • @matlas___
      @matlas___ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @liewsernjet2163 hahaha when I wrote this comment I was in my first year of undergrad maths degree, I have since gotten my degree and forgotten how to do most of this lol

  • @mrteddy808
    @mrteddy808 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Shout out to my boi De'Memes.

  • @Mike-tu4lc
    @Mike-tu4lc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally got it afta watching so many similiar videos, ur the best!

  • @robertyotamzimba8628
    @robertyotamzimba8628 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you have done what my lecturer failed to do. thanks.

  • @banderfargoyl
    @banderfargoyl 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Speaking of DeMoivres formula: I didn't know you could prove this inductively, so you don't need to start with Eulers formula. In fact that's the easiest way to get Eulers formula.

  • @leeksoup3199
    @leeksoup3199 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this was very helpful, thank you

  • @emmadanielle5680
    @emmadanielle5680 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So helpful! You are a really good teacher

  • @ivanildoneves2240
    @ivanildoneves2240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Você é incrível 🔥 🙏. Não entendo nada do que você fala mas entendo tudo o que você escreve. Obrigado 😁

  • @brianfisher1305
    @brianfisher1305 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos are amazing! They actually made me interested in math!

  • @kevincastillo_4
    @kevincastillo_4 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ty so much, very usefull from Spain

  • @anshorisaputra6772
    @anshorisaputra6772 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If sin(3x) = -4sin^3x + 3sinx , cos(3x) = 4cos^3x - 3cosx,
    what is the simply value of tan(3x)??? Please help me to find it... thanks...

  • @TarazMohamed
    @TarazMohamed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AMAZING EXPLICATION 😁😁

  • @smellymewi
    @smellymewi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn, I can understand your approach much more easier than my professor

  • @estie4930
    @estie4930 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thank you so much

  • @manas599
    @manas599 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Whoa! That just blew my mind.

    • @Mnemonic-X
      @Mnemonic-X 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Manas Tiwari But my mind was blown when I found out that the USSR still legally exists.

    • @manas599
      @manas599 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Сергей Мишин When was that?

    • @Mnemonic-X
      @Mnemonic-X 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Manas Tiwari 3 months ago. But the Russian Federation is actually fake. It's not a state at all.

  • @theSASarethebest
    @theSASarethebest 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you do a proof for fractional powers when using De Moivre's theorem?

  • @matthewstevens340
    @matthewstevens340 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you recommend I could practice my integrals? I already have a brilliant.org subscription but Wolfram Alpha looks good too

  • @clareese7610
    @clareese7610 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU 🙏🏼

  • @helenrok2077
    @helenrok2077 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is out here saving my math HL ass once again

  • @krsnasameer
    @krsnasameer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So sick!!

  • @hamzagaming2208
    @hamzagaming2208 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh! Franchement j'ai aimé beaucoup cette vidéo merciii , le théorème de Moiver est assez facile maintenant
    Et que tu fasse quelques vidéos de matrices et les applications linéaire
    Vous êtes vraiment super-prof je vous remircie du fond de mon cœur !

  • @Metalhammer1993
    @Metalhammer1993 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    De moivres theorem never heard but isn't that just eulers formula with some basic exponent rules? Sure i would have taken two steps instead of one to get to (cos theta +isin theta) ^3 going over e^3 theta=(e^theta)^3 and then putting the identity back in, and then I'd probably mess up mulipying things out to be perfectly honest xD

    • @freddiemaier2351
      @freddiemaier2351 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your method is correct, but originally, before Euler came up with that formula, De Moivre discovered his rule and proved it for all n. Of course, now with Euler’s formula, the proof is much easier

    • @lukandrate9866
      @lukandrate9866 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't assume that the power rule holds for complex exponents, but De Moivre proved it to hold in such special cases when the second exponent is an integer.

  • @MathIguess
    @MathIguess 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful video!

  • @reubenstephen1314
    @reubenstephen1314 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re a life saver

  • @OonHan
    @OonHan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing Videos! Keep it up!!!

  • @user-vm6qx2tu3j
    @user-vm6qx2tu3j 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Math is so beautiful

    • @Mnemonic-X
      @Mnemonic-X 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rash Scientist Mathematics with the i (imaginary unit) is not mathematics at all.

    • @user-vm6qx2tu3j
      @user-vm6qx2tu3j 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Сергей Мишин ?

    • @Mnemonic-X
      @Mnemonic-X 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rash Scientist What didn't you understand?

    • @user-vm6qx2tu3j
      @user-vm6qx2tu3j 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Сергей Мишин ur statement
      I am not from a pure science background so probably I didn't understand what you said.
      I just solve math equations and learn from videos so maybe there r certain things that I may not be knowing.
      That's why I want you to explain

    • @Mnemonic-X
      @Mnemonic-X 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rash Scientist Do u know what the imaginary unit is?

  • @ewiano_
    @ewiano_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @viralreels153
    @viralreels153 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow You Made It easy 💓

  • @yuval2be
    @yuval2be 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey I have a question for you, solve and find the answers for 10^x=x+100. I know there should be 2 answers because of the graphs of the functions. But didn't know how to really solve this equation. I read about the W-Lambert function which helps solves this, I didn't fully understand how to use it. Can you explain that please?

    • @TheTimeDilater
      @TheTimeDilater 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yuval Tuby hey you can use Taylor series expansion for 10^x to get a polynomial eqn and solve it for x

    • @ethanpfeiffer7403
      @ethanpfeiffer7403 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You could solve it graphically.

  • @chrisursich
    @chrisursich 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's a great idea!

  • @anjanmukherjee7997
    @anjanmukherjee7997 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please could you upload a video like this with higher powers and coefficients like 51 or 251 instead of 3?

  • @devprajapati5063
    @devprajapati5063 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video

  • @AndDiracisHisProphet
    @AndDiracisHisProphet 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Next time you should call Peyam to pronounce the french and german names for you^^

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AndDiracisHisProphet that's a great idea!!! How come I didn't think of this earlier

    • @Gold161803
      @Gold161803 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That voice wasn't Dr Peyam??? XD

    • @AndDiracisHisProphet
      @AndDiracisHisProphet 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      close, but not exact :D

  • @lokix3807
    @lokix3807 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice, thanks a lot :)

  • @invictus82
    @invictus82 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks

  • @sagarsaini6191
    @sagarsaini6191 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey please solve the integral of
    1/(x+e^x) & (cos(x^2))/(x^2)

  • @ZipplyZane
    @ZipplyZane 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That app didn't get the French pronunciation right. I would bet Dr. Payam would say "duh MWAH-vruh."
    That said, words do enter English with different pronunciations. So it might be "duh MOY-vuhr" in English.

  • @smartcat5989
    @smartcat5989 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great English ❤

  • @kofij19
    @kofij19 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot

  • @junowong5006
    @junowong5006 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    TH-cam recommend this video after doing this question in final

  • @aminadm2136
    @aminadm2136 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU!!!!!

  • @Kino-Imsureq
    @Kino-Imsureq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    14th comment here
    Hi blackpenredpen!
    I am struggling so much trying to find how to find the sin or cosine of theta.
    no, not theta as in like 150 degrees or 60 degrees (a multiple of 5), i wanna know how to do something like 167 degrees, 78 degrees, 13 degrees, something that isn't a multiple of 5.
    I really need help with it (well, not having an exam next week, i just had my death exam in math (which was easy for me). I'm 10 so i don't have ideas for it). May you make a video about it please. :)
    don't worry i know radians, i just think degrees is easier to understand...
    (don't even try the addition, subtraction, or square adding formulas(is there even a square adding formula?), it doesn't work.)
    proof:
    squaring the numbers ending in 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 will not be a multiple of 5. so, trying to get a square root that results in a number ending with 5 or 0 will be impossible if you square root a non-multiple of 5.
    addition and subtraction will result in a multiple of 5 if you use multiples of 5 in addition or subtraction.
    please help me :) I believe you can do it. :)

    • @stephenbeck7222
      @stephenbeck7222 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The answer is that for 99% of use cases, we don’t bother trying to find an exact answer. People long ago found close decimal approximations for all the integer degree values of the trig functions and compiled them into trig tables. Today we just use a calculator. So sin(167) = 0.22495...

    • @robertlozyniak3661
      @robertlozyniak3661 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I suggest you read about "half-angle formulas" and also "Ptolemy's table of chords".

    • @Kino-Imsureq
      @Kino-Imsureq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't want to use a calculator. Are all high school students that lazy in finding values of trig functions?
      i mean what i could do is for example:
      25 / 25 = 1
      but then is there any division solution for it or multiplication?
      sin( 25 / 25 ) = ?(25) ? ?(25)...
      so yep, and here is when multiplication is needed.
      sin( 25 / 25 * degrees )
      and that's a complete problem for us.

    • @Kino-Imsureq
      @Kino-Imsureq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Robert doesn't really help, but i could divide the chord into half and the angle too. then divide the chord into 120 pieces and that's the sine, right?

    • @Kino-Imsureq
      @Kino-Imsureq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      btw robert there is a part there where you have to do this same process all over again.

  • @romalivan4440
    @romalivan4440 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very useful

  • @atulit
    @atulit 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make video solving cubic and x^5 equations

    • @benhur2806
      @benhur2806 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cubic equations: /watch?v=yY09LFn06nc
      Quartic equations: /watch?v=32JL_ZAIDo-I
      As for quintic equations, it is not possible to solve a general quintic equation, as proven by Abel in 1824.
      EDIT: Typo

  • @Kurtlane
    @Kurtlane 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No birds were injured in making of this video. :-)

  • @robertmolldius8643
    @robertmolldius8643 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanx! ☺

  • @azzamlabib4785
    @azzamlabib4785 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Whoa, this is easier than expanding from 3x=x+2x 😮

  • @kankanarock3443
    @kankanarock3443 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the Doraemon song playing in the background?

  • @BloobleBonker
    @BloobleBonker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    แบลกเพ็นเร็ดเพ็นดีมากเลย

  • @AlgyCuber
    @AlgyCuber 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is just the euler’s formula

  • @Anteater23
    @Anteater23 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're the best

  • @internetexplorer7912
    @internetexplorer7912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    سیگنال؟

  • @chuuuu1131
    @chuuuu1131 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    *W H E R E A R E Y O U R F I N G E R S ?*

  • @OonHan
    @OonHan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YAY!!!!!

  • @SoyFerchow
    @SoyFerchow 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love you. ❤

  • @3420undertaker
    @3420undertaker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    more

  • @akriteepathak5779
    @akriteepathak5779 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doraemon in bg for intro

  • @3420undertaker
    @3420undertaker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bet you could prove that you could kill two birds with one stone

  • @Magic73805
    @Magic73805 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir😂😂😂. I'm first viewer.😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

  • @reazraza
    @reazraza 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Watashi wa hontōni kono chan'neru ga daisuki. Tried my best to translate😂

    • @gnikola2013
      @gnikola2013 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TyronRaza 3915 Kono chaneru wo hontōni watashi wa daisuki
      Insert meme: "Well, I'm kind of a scholar myself"

  • @invictus82
    @invictus82 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Doraemon

  • @nikhilbhiwandkar8563
    @nikhilbhiwandkar8563 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    first

  • @ibtihalch3708
    @ibtihalch3708 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @akriteepathak5779
    @akriteepathak5779 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks