I passed your test! I've learnt a new word, hanger-on, but I knew how to make it plural. Howeverr, I had no idea about "adopted solution". I come across that word order all the time (adopted law/regulation), and I must admit I use it too 🤭
Well done! 🎉🎉🎉 And yes, that goes to show that it is indeed used despite being technically incorrect. Now you know so you can play with it however you want💪
That's a very good point. I'll be completely honest: whilst secondary clauses don't need a comma if they come after the main one because we can see when they start through the presence of a conjunction, since here we have an inversion rather than IF, I'm not 100% sure whether we actually need it or not. In any case, if it's true that we don't, I'd say it's unnecessary and superfluous rather than flat-out wrong. What do you think?
❤
🤩
Great video, thanks!! Very interesting and accurate explanations!
I'm really happy you liked it! Thanks! 🤩 I think I will release the second part in a couple of weeks 😉
I passed your test! I've learnt a new word, hanger-on, but I knew how to make it plural. Howeverr, I had no idea about "adopted solution". I come across that word order all the time (adopted law/regulation), and I must admit I use it too 🤭
Well done! 🎉🎉🎉
And yes, that goes to show that it is indeed used despite being technically incorrect. Now you know so you can play with it however you want💪
As far as I know, in the sentence 'I would have gone to the park, had it not rained', in addition to what you've said, the comma is mistakenly used.
That's a very good point. I'll be completely honest: whilst secondary clauses don't need a comma if they come after the main one because we can see when they start through the presence of a conjunction, since here we have an inversion rather than IF, I'm not 100% sure whether we actually need it or not. In any case, if it's true that we don't, I'd say it's unnecessary and superfluous rather than flat-out wrong. What do you think?
🤷 *Promosm*