In this video we look at the form of an Abrahamic tradition as attributed to one of the most prolific hadith narrators, Abu Hurayra. This is yet another video containing information most Muslims have not been exposed to. Predictably, as a response in the comments section below, we will see personal attacks as well as polemics against Christianity. For any interested in possible relevant ancient near eastern background to Abraham's marriage to Sarah: “Thou art my sister was technically true (20:12), and E. A. Speiser has drawn attention to the esteem in which the Hurrians (influential at Haran) held the wife-sister relationship: a husband would even legally adopt his wife as sister to increase his authority and the status of the marriage." -Kidner, D. (1967). Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary (Vol. 1, p. 127). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. Regardless, the Biblical accounts faithfully record the actions, whether good or bad, of Biblical characters- this includes prophets. Biblical writers were not driven by such apologetic concerns when recording their accounts. For those well versed in Biblical theology, we expect perfection in the next life, not this one. “One result of the great changes brought about by Islamic domination of the Arabian Peninsula was that the once colorful fabric representing the diverse religio-cultural expressions of the sixth and seventh century Arabia survived only as disjointed remnants. Some pre-Islamic legends survived through reinterpretation according to the developing religious standards of early Islam. But more often, certain bits and pieces of ancient tales survived as they were reworked into the legends, evolving to serve as foundations for the newly developing religious system…one such source containing material bearing strong similarities to Biblicist and indigenous pre-Islamic tradition is the revelation known as the Quran.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.7 “Some material deriving from Biblicist and pre-Islamic pagan environments had become so well integrated into Islamic lore that they were included in the most respected collections and cited freely in authoritative exegesis of the Quran.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.10 “In fact, however, stories or legends that are specifically designated by medieval Muslim scholars as Israelite Tales cannot be found in Jewish literature- at least not as they are found in Islamic sources…a story deemed by Islam as an Israelite Tale is actually…a unique and authentically Islamic tale.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.13 “The evidence…can be found in Arabic genealogies, which appear to connect the Northern Arabs and the tribe of Muhammad to Hagar and Ishmael only in late- that is, Islamic-texts. Pre-Islamic pagan Arab genealogies appear to have no awareness or concern for the connection…” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.37 “It was said: The king had a daughter of extreme goodness and beauty [cf. Gen 12:11] named Hagar…Then Gabriel came to Abraham and gave him the good news that God would provide him with a child through…Hagar a son through whom would appear a prophet by the name of Muhammad, the seal of the prophets…when she [Hagar] gave birth to Ishmael, his face shone like the moon with the light of our prophet Muhammad.” -Al-Kisa’i’s, cited from Firestone, -Journeys in the Holy Lands p.41
I've always found it weird how the Islamic texts go out of their way to describe each individual prophet as beautiful and describing their facial hair and whatever. Very strange indeed.
@@IslamCritiqued If physical appearance is so important to them, why do some muslim women cover themselves with what looks like blankets with a narrow strip across the eyes so they can see where they are going. Very odd. Look at the way the Gospel of Mark 1, 6 describes John the Baptist's appearance. Muslims would not approve. It's a carnally minded religion with no spiritual discernment whatsoever. They remind me of Joseph Smith's religion of Mormonism.
I'm referring more to the physical appearance of Muhammad which is described over and over in the narrations. There are some khutbah's on TH-cam talking about how good looking he was. Some are comical
The information in the video shone brighter than moon that I had to watch it twice. A hard hitting episode once again. Thank you. I had always wandered why Hagar only featured in Hadith and never in the Koran. (But Sarah does feature in Koran).
Just recently found your channel through David Wood's channel and I got to say, I'm loving it! People like you make the Christian Faith taste wholesome sweeter with a deeper, stronger sense of security & assurance in Christ alone. Thank you IC.
Your last conclusion is soooo right. Every time I post something critical about Islam quoting Quran or Hadith, I expect nothing else in response then that it's abrogated (Quran), weak (Hadiths) or rebuked by scholar soandso (both)
Are you familiair with some of Patricia Crone’s work? I read an interesting paper of her on the Jewish and Babylonian roots of the Islamic Harut and Marut.
I agree his work is convincing. However, we must be nuanced, in my opinion. In practice (i.e. worshiping the black stone), and in Quranic/Hadith geography we do see Nabataean parallels. However, in the texts, we see Jewish/Christian/apocryphal/pseudepigraphical influence overwhelmingly. To add to this, we see in these sources the types of oral tradition that we see from pre-Islamic Arabian poets as well. We also see from Islamic literature the push to move historical events (Abraham, Moses) south into Arabia. So in many ways the texts are a good fit for Arabia. I think we need to recognize first, as Gibson does, the southern shift of Islam- from Petra to Arabia. And with this, we need to recognize that the primary sources of Islam (I'm including the quran as well) developed during and after that shift took place. In short, both could be true, we just have to remember that "Muhammad" the man is far removed from the texts that describe him, both in time and in geography.
Islam Critiqued as an aside, what I enjoyed most about Mr. Gibson’s book Pre Islamic Geography was his discussion about the early tribal societies mention, in passing as it were, in Genesis that were close to the Israelites and how these early stories fit better with Petra, especially the story of Hagar, the well of Zam Zam, and the name of Petra as the Mother of All Colonies. Abraham’s activities in Islamic sources seem to fit better too. Of course this does nothing for the Islamic case. However this seems to be our problem rather than theirs.
Your presentation of facts is perfect and very logical and reasonable for any Muslim would believe. Your voice is calming and convincing. Lastly, your nice on the eyes
Aren't you so amazed at how Christian he is, i.e. he has to twist the facts so badly to feel as if he's gotten a pin fall? Too bad he still cannot provide us with clear and explicit biblical evidence in which his triplets god declares himself by himself as being made up of 3 co-equal yet distinct persons and names the 3 persons all by himself!
@@esabdalla 🤔 have you read ?? And what has that HAve to do with the topic he is addressing?? Quran is a incomplete book full of plagiarism from man made sources
@@albusai Muslims always change the topic when they don´t have an argument like you can talk about Islam and they will change the topic from talking Islam to the trinity. There is no point of debating or arguing with Muslims because they will lie and change the topic and they already made up their minds before even engaging with you so every answer that you give to them will always be wrong in their eyes and they will argue back and forth with you until they´re blue in the face and then leave. Trust me, you will have an easier time teaching a pig advanced calculus than teaching a Muslim basic christian doctrine that anyone at catholic or any christian school can answer.
Colin, thank you for yet another superbly academic and manifestly inspired presentation on an important aspect of Islam that I, and a good many others, were largely unaware of. Thank you so very much for all the effort and work that goes into this, in terms of research, in terms of analysis, in terms of attention to detail, and also in terms of a flawless delivery in beautiful and clear English. I have a question unrelated specifically to this topic, but I have the impression you may be able to answer it for me. Jay Smith mentions that the version of the Qur'an that is widely and almost universally promulgated in the west and in many parts of the Arab world or Muslim world is a version that was canonized in 1924, a version that was not only canonized in 1924 but fashioned in the seven years prior to that canonization. Jay Smith reports that this version of the Qur'an was first produced in Cairo Egypt, and that several decades later religious Authority in Saudi Arabia decreed that this 1924 version would be and should be the version to use for all translations to foreign languages and for study for the faithful. However, Jay Smith and you have pointed out that Turkey had and has an edition of the Qur'an that differs from other versions, and in fact differences among various editions of the Qur'an is not a rare phenomenon but is the norm. My specific question is regarding the Arabic edition of the Qur'an that was preserved among the Turks. Did the Turks switch to the 1924 version of the Qur'an, did the Turks somewhat adapt or modify their version of the Qur'an to the 1924 canonized edition, and if the Turks ever switched or ever altered their version of a Quran to make it conform to the 1924 standardized version, in what year the Turks do this? My question is for my own curiosity's sake. I would like to be able to have a look at the Turks' Arabic version of the Qur'an. I would in fact like to purchase a copy of the Qur'an as the Ottomans preserved it, even by buying a fairly inexpensive Edition printed in the 20th century. I just need to know at what point any changes would have been made in the Turkish print edition of the Qur'an to make it conform to the 1924 edition, if any changes were ever made. I am hoping that you can just rattle off an answer like 1956 or 1928, as I am certainly not trying to add academic burden to your shoulders; I can see that you are a man on a mission.
Not only that, but the 1924 edition was produced because of the complaints Muslim clerics received about the differences in the Qurans that were being distributed in schools. Also, it is not a Quran in Turkey, rather, a manuscript. Briefly, the manuscripts all differ, and we're up to 31 Arabic Qurans now. Interesting, what many of the corrections show is that the scribes were attempting to bring them into conformity with what we now know as the 1924 edition.
@@IslamCritiqued I had no idea. That is fascinating. So did Turkey automatically adopt the 1924 edition? I am astonished even indignant that Muslim scholars carry on the pretence of an unchanged Qur'an from the days of Muhammed when it has only been unchanged since 1924.
It was standardized by Cairo. Also, it hasn't been unchanged since 1924. A couple of revisions followed to address some issues that were missed. It's difficult to see where the line is between Muslim academics who affirm the Quran is unchanged and those who don't. Certainly, there are many who admit there are numerous changes, but this information doesn't filter down very well. Then the rebuttal comes, "the text doesn't matter, since MILLIONS of people memorized it."
@@jamesweller1965 To flesh out the story a bit. There were (I believe) 36 "standard" Qurans prior to 1924 - one for each of the classic schools of transmission. Cairo decided to adopt one of those (Hafs) for use in their schools so that everyone was on the same page. The model worked, so others began to adopt it. Soon Egypt adopted in nationally. Later, Saudi Arabia canonized it for "all" of the Arabic-speaking world. That was not until 1980 or so. That greatly accelerated the adoption, but some hold outs remain even today. Hafs is about 95% of Arabic Qurans, but most of the other 35 can still be found in use - I believe Jay and Hatun have tracked down 30 or 32 of the 36. Prior to 1924 Hafs was already dominant. This is due to an accident of history - it happened to be the first one printed using a printing press - not anything special about it. The versions aren't massively different, but rather have the typical amount of variation one finds from handwritten manuscripts. The problem for Muslims is 1) they lie about "perfect preservation" as an "authenticating miracle" and thus this info is devastating to people when they learn it. 2) There is no critical edition of the Quran (unlike Bible) because Muslims are afraid of losing the perfect preservation myth. This means the original text is far less certain than the original Biblical text.
@@ReasonedAnswers Thank you for that careful and detailed response. Thank you for getting solid information out to the world. The truth will prevail thanks to efforts like yours.
@@sayedf11 _"Miracles Quran MENTION"_ Of course none of these verse say anything remotely like what you claim they say, but I did have to laugh at this one: "21 104 future collapse of universe." That would contradict known science as the universe will not collapse but instead continue to expand forever. OOPS!
Thanks so much for your commitment. Keep it up! With islam there is an endless comedy. Abu bakir, Bakari and Moe. Whoop whoop whoop! Heading to the place the sunsets tomorrow, some hot tubbing and barbeque. Out
Distinction between infallibility and impeccability required. Infallibility means cannot err, impeccability means cannot sin. All the same great video.
@@IslamCritiqued ok. Thanks. That's interesting if it is the case. It must be an Arabic concept that we are translating imprecisely. Essentially we are dealing with perfection.
Under, "why was this pre-Islamic story kept within Islam" I would add that it may have just been a well-known and well-circulated story that wasn't going anywhere, therefore Islamic authorities thought it best to sanitize and utilize it for their own purposes rather than leave it as was. This was what I assume happened with certain pre-Christian tales that made it into explicitly Christian works such as The Golden Legend. Stories about the local hero were going to persist one way or the other, so the Church might as well mint an "authorized" version. It is worth remembering that in both cases (early medieval Europe and Arabia) the societies were not so literate that the general populace would be able to research and compare and determine what material was pre-Christian/Islamic and what was post. A child being raised on stories of Abraham and Dhul Qarnayn in an Islamic context would have no reason to suppose they were somehow un- or pre-Islamic.
The hadiths and Sunnah keep mentioning Syria, as though Syria was so important. I wondered why Syria would be so important that they are always talking about it and came across a hadith in which Abu Huraira said that the prophet said the Dajjal would descend at the White Minaret in Damascus. The problem is that "Mohammad" died in 632, and the White Minaret was built in 634. The speaker says the White Minaret as though it was already there in Damascus so this leaves several options for this problem. 1: There was more than one Mohammad. 2: It was spoken by someone else they claim was Mohammad. 3: Mohammad had a time machine. 4: It was merely attributed to Mohammad. There are many instances in which there seems to be more than one Mohammad, because there is a lack of continuity in the speeches, and they are so contradictory with each other. For instance, it is claimed Mohammad was born in Mecca, yet it is also implied he was born in Syria and in Petra. At least one Mohammad preached from the Bible, directly quoting verses from Job, Psalm and Isaiah. One Mohammad said that some man he knew had to crawl through the snow as a punishment. Since when does Mecca get snow? That means a Mohammad was from an area where there was snow, otherwise how would the Yathrib Arabs even know what snow was if they had never seen it? Anyway, I don't know if there were multiple men they claimed was the one Mohammad, but they repeat stories of other men doing things and then say "I heard the prophet say", well, which prophet? The Mohammad was attached by the writer of the hadith. Any time you see Mohammad in the Quran, it was inserted by the translator and not directly written.
I bet pre-Islamic Arabia was actually a very diverse and culturally beautiful place. Then Muhammad and the islamists came in and decimated the religious and cultural fabric of that part of the Levant and permanently destroyed the Christian, jewish and pagan settlements. Arabia would have been better off pagan.
You do such an excellent job with these videos about Islam. I noticed something today, do not know if youtube did it on purpose or it was a glitch. I had subscribed to you a few weeks ago, then I just noticed I got unsub. Weird. Subscribing again, and will keep an eye if it happens again. Keep up your great work!!! :)
Hagar being the daughter of a king reminds me of the south korean "christian" end time sect called ShinChonJi. Their spiritual leader, Lee Man Hee, when he visited us in Berlin (and i was dragged to the place so i would listen to him ... At that time my mother was part of the sect, but didn't know they were a sect) they presented him like a king. A scepter, a big kingly chair, in red and gold, and even announcing that he was a descendant of some korean king pffff ahahaha. it's almost like this pattern is the modus operandi of all sects, they always try to attach themselves to something or someone bigger and better so they can improve their status. I saw it in the Korean sect, and we see it with Islam
@@IslamCritiqued ouff i would have to wake my mother and ask her ^^" Well what i still remember is that hey built their own City, 4 outer walls with the same length and each with 3 gates. Basically it's supposed to be built as described in revelations lol. I think they do believe in reincarnation but only after judgement day. Something about 144000 people in the book of Life being the highest ranked people in gods paradise blabla... Funnily their sect far exceeded that number now at 200000 XD And this lee Man hee is supposed to replace Jesus and he "proved" that by having ridden a flying white horse (in his delusions XD) and sending 7 letters to 7 churches in korea XD His followers believe he is immortal lololol XD That being said, Korean sects are extremely dangerous. I am currently at the technical University Berlin and i know of the shinchonji and the "church of mother God" both trying to actively lure innocent and naive Christians into their sects :/ Sorry for the many XD s
Brother Colin: The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 1 Verses 1 to 16 speak of the genealogy of Jesus Christ. Also Genesis Chapter 17 Verse 20 states that Ishmael was blessed by God and begot twelve prince's. So if our Muslim friends claim that their Prophet Mohammad was a descendant of Ishmael, was Mohammad or anyone else able to trace his (Prophet Mohammad's) genealogy to Ishmael? Which of the twelve prince's genealogy is Mohammad from?
@sayedf11: This is a TH-cam video which refutes the claim that the Islamic Prophet Mohammad was mentioned in Song of Solomon 5:16. Link Below. 👇 th-cam.com/video/2gJTLtbIE5g/w-d-xo.html
@sayedf11: John 4:16 refuted in this TH-cam video. Link Below. 👇 th-cam.com/video/ADjRvO3jmLA/w-d-xo.html What was the Islamic Prophet Mohammad, a human or a spirit?
I believe in one verse of the Qur'an, 83:13: When Our verses are recited to him, he says, "Legends of the former peoples." But, to match your video, I would insert the word 'Modified' before 'Legends'. Muslims fully realize mohammed used these fables and stories, but can't admit he did.
Go away, troll. You brought this up previously and then clarified that adding a mem made the "verb into a noun". You have no idea what you're talking about. Defend your religion, coward.
@@T1985-q1d your allah is just another name for SATAN. JEHOVAH is GOD of both the CHRISTIANS and JEWS. EXODUS 6:3; ISAIAH 12:2; ISAIAH 26:4; PSALM 83:18. What nationality was ABRAHAM??
@@T1985-q1d are you trying to imply that meshullam means Muslim? XD Does the word Muslim not come from Islam? And Islam means "to surrender" or "to submit". But as i googled with meshullam, it means devoted or befriended. So the meaning is totally different. If you want to go with the phonetic fallacy, at least do it 100%. Allahu akbar from now on means "acursed mouse". Thank you for admitting that your god is cursed.
"Allahu akbar " means "G-d is Great" in the bible." Akbar means "mouse" in Hebrew. "Allahu" isn't even a word in Hebrew. I've had enough of your nonsense. All you do is clog up the comments.
Do you take requests? What do you think about gen 18? Abraham was visited by 3 visitors. Many sources say they were angels, but Abraham calls them Adonay. A term used to address Yaweh.
Gen 18:1 "And YHWH appeared to him..." don't be confused by the "angel" language. I have a video that will interface with this topic soon that you will find helpful.
Sure thing. The short story is the Hebrew term for angel is actually VERY versatile. Don't think of "angel" (or the Hebrew behind it) as being an ontological category. I'll demonstrate this thoroughly while addressing a video by the Trinity Delusion. So look for that one.
The Nabateans, the group most likely to be the primary pre-Islamic people, were camel traders that defended their trade source by fabricating tall tales about where their trade items came from and how hard these were to obtain in order to justify the exorbitant prices they charged. Defending claims against all comers was just part of haggling or bargaining. All social customs and traditions that come under the rubric of religion provide some training for getting on in the world. Forcing the children to defend the indefensible was just good business training. The modern Islamic adherents are simply employing, albeit unconsciously, this market haggling technique to defend their religion. It works most of the time which is to say enough times to be profitable. It is not at all certain that we will be able to stop its spread because, first and foremost, there are strong indications of payments being made to the right people to gain market access, and second of all the group that is most able and motivated to organize and see off the civilizational threat that is Islam, I speak of the Christians, are still dealing with the unexploded ordinance of the rending of Christendom. A war, I might add, that was encouraged for commerce’s sake not religion’s.
It's even shows how Magamad wanted to be "their guy", share stories so people would get excitement and listen to him, so his religion was based like that - he sits and tells the religious stories, all of them, anything he had ever heard, as his own "revelations". What a disgusting cult, it's so easy to dealt with, just leave islam guys, it is unbelieveable, what's to hold onto here? You're not religious people, you just use islam to culturaly stand out, you care not about nor God, nor nothing. When christians, papa is back in the house to settle thigs right you must listen or peris. Yet they sit here and bickering with no point, wanna be like us, scholars of our religeon, be faithul, and instead just look like some ugly sort of fanatics. Leave islam, guys, LEAVE islam. After what i saw here, after all i saw i would leave islam within 3 seconds without a doubt (i wouldn't even be in it, really, some people are not too). Abragham was a first muslim and there were no other muslims beside him and Sarrah (how about Hagar? if Abragham was not yet in testament, why Sarrah upon marriage counted as muslim?). Then who was Noah? Then who was Adam?))) And why of all 99 names, two of Magamad's names are "first" and "last"? Is he god? Okay, if he ain't "first" being in universe, then who 1-st he is? Right, FIRST MUSLIM, then no Abragham, no Noah, no Adam was muslims, Magamad only was one and he invented all of that... and he ain't needed much, he just stole stories. And muslim know this, why is Magamad that much praised? Because he brought islaaaaam... but who were Abragham then? There you go. Myth busted!
"It's even shows how Magamad wanted to be "their guy", share stories so people would get excitement and listen to him" This is played out in places like Surah 2:78-79. Apparently Muhammad would recite to new audiences oral traditions that he thought were faithfully preserved, and that they would accept. Swift disappointment would follow, however, when the Jews didn't even recognize then and called him a mad poet. The traditions had evolved well outside of the bounds set by Jewish tradition.
@@IslamCritiqued Why it is so funny overall?))) What a miserable LOSER after all, satan found his perfect guy (it's no difficult, plenty of people like Magamad) who wanted power and was so wicked... or is he became wicked? I heard many times from CP that Magamad is NOT his real name even, Magamad is like title, means - "praised one", already a hideous blasphemy and breaking of second commandement. God bless you, brother, LOVE you, thanks for the response.
Muslims..try reading this. Then you'll know were the mad poet Muhammad got his theology that Jesus didn't die on the cross. Are you proud of his and Allah's ability to plagiarize a 2nd century AD gnostic text called the Second Treatise of the Great Seth. Did Allah and Mo have any original thoughts? Can you defend their plagiarism? Read the text: "For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And the plan which they devised about me to release their Error and their senselessness - I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me. And I did not die in reality but in appearance, lest I be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I according to their sight and thought, in order that they may never find any word to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance"
I like to keep the videos moving, so I post all of the text in a pinned comment so that people can look into them more. I see I forgot to do that on this video, I'll fix that. Thanks!
Hehe _abu Hurayrah_ means "Father of Kitty". There was a Syrian rebel fighter from Florida whose nom de guerre was _abu Hurayrah al-'Amriki,_ abu Hurayrah the American, so named because he often had a cat with him in photos
@They don't like it up em I don't think this is a real quote. The only places it appears on the entire internet are your youtube comments and this website: setfreeseminars.com/2017/10/17/how-samaritanism-infiltrated-islam/ which suggests Islam stole from Samaritanism. I tried all kinds of searches without quotes in case the quotation was slightly wrong and found nothing. If this was real information, it seem highly unlikely that no one else would know about it.
@They don't like it up em I'm not opposed to the idea of the Quran stealing the formula from somewhere, although I think Mohammad adding his name on to a classic declaration about God ("There is no God but one") is more plausible. I do have Shadow of the Sword so I'll see if I can find it. Thanks for the book recommendation; I'll check it out.
*BIBLE PROVES JESUS WAS A MUSLIM.* *LANGUAGE* Hebrew, Aramaic & Arabic share the same "root" language which is known as "common semetic"/ "dialect". Moses spoke; Hebrew Jesus spoke; Aramaic Muhammad spoke; Arabic The name for "God" is the same; MOSES*- Hebrew- ELAH / ELOAH JESUS*- Aramaic- ALAH / ALAHA MUHAMMAD*- Arabic- ALLAH Abrahamic Greeting "Peace Be Upon You" MOSES- Hebrew- Shālôm ʻAlêḵem JESUS- Aramaic- Shlama Alekhun MUHAMMAD- Arabic- Salam Alekum In Hebrew, Jesus is; YESHUA In Aramaic, Jesus is; EASHUA in Arabic, Jesus is; EESA The letter "J" is NOT in the Hebrew alphabet. The Romans Latinized the His name from "EASHUA" to JESUS to convert Him into a Roman. Then, they added "CHRIST" from the Greek language which means "MESSIAH". What language do you speak??? *LAWS;* Don't eat pork. Leviticus 11:7 And the pig, though it has a divided hoof, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. Leviticus 11:24 “‘You will make yourselves unclean by these; whoever touches their carcasses will be unclean till evening. Whoever picks up one of their carcasses must wash their clothes, and they will be unclean till evening. Leviticus 11:43 "Do not defile yourselves by any of these creatures. Do not make yourselves unclean by means of them or be made unclean by them. I am the Lord your God; consecrate yourselves and be holy, because I am holy. Do not make yourselves unclean by any creature that moves along the ground. I am the Lord, who brought you up out of Egypt to be your God; therefore be holy, because I am holy." Mathew 5:17-19 JESUS said; *"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.* *For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.* *Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.* *Bible says if you eat pork or follow anyone who eats pork, you go to HELL!!!* Isaiah 66:17 "Those who consecrate and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one who is among those who eat the flesh of PIGS, rats and other unclean things--they will meet their end together with the one they follow," declares the LORD. Do you eat pork??? *CIRCUMCISION* Luke 2:21 On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named JESUS, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived. Are you circumcised??? *FASTING* Matthew 4:2 After fasting forty days and forty nights, He (JESUS) was hungry. Matthew 6:16 JESUS said; "When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show others they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. Do you fast??? *PRAYER* THE JEWS HAVE A FORM OF WORSHIP. Matthew 26:39 “He (JESUS) went a little farther and fell on His face, and prayed to God (ALLAH). Genesis 17:3 “Then ABRAHAM fell on his face, and prayed to God (ALLAH) (talked with him.") Numbers 20:6 “So MOSES and AARON went from the presence of the assembly to the door of the tabernacle of meeting, and they fell on their faces and prayed to God (ALLAH). Joshua 5:14 Then JOSHUA fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and prayed to God (ALLAH) Do you pray the same??? JESUS CONFIRMS HE IS A MUSLIM IN ORIGINAL ARAMAIC GOSPEL; Luke 6:40 - In ARAMAIC JESUS said; "Ein talmeed na'leh 'al rabbo; shekken kal adam she'MUSHLAM yihyeh k'rabbo." Translation in English: "No student can be above his teacher, but everyone that is a MUSLIM, can be as his teacher." IF JESUS CAME TO THE JEWS, THEY WOULD REJECT HIM. IF JESUS CAME TO THE MUSLIMS WE WOULD ACCEPT HIM BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM. MUSLIMS SPEAK THE CLOSEST DIALECT TO JESUS. MUSLIMS FOLLOW THE LAWS JESUS FOLLOWED. MUSLIMS PRAY EXACTLY LIKE JESUS. MUSLIMS BELIEVE JESUS IS THE MESSIAH. IF JESUS WENT TO THE CHRISTIANS, HE WOULDN'T FEEL COMFORTABLE. HE DOSNT SPEAK ENGLISH, HE DOSNT EAT PORK AND HIS FORM OF WORSHIP IS DIFFERENT. AND IF THATS NOT ENOUGH, THEY DONT EVEN KNOW HIS NAME. THE CHRISTIANS WOULD HAVE TO TEACH JESUS ENGLISH AND CHRISTIAN FORM OF WORSHIP. THEN THE CHRISTIANS WOULD FORCE FEED JESUS PORK. WHY WOULD JESUS WANT TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THAT?
@@realitycheck3672 This isn't how language works. Also, where do I find this "original aramaic" gospel that you have access to but professional scholars have never heard of?
Muhammad might have plagiarized Bible stories from his first wife's cousin - Waraqah ibn Nawfal who was a Christian priest who translated the New Testament from Greek according to hadiths. The hadiths say that he died before Muhammad's career as a Prophet really got started but that he accepted him as a true messenger of God. Other hadiths say Muhammad had seen the Torah on several occasion.
I'm more along the lines of a later date. So when I say "Muhammad", I'm referring to a historical construct that occurred over a couple hundred years after the historical Muhammad most probably lived. Thoughts?
@@IslamCritiqued You may be right. It's not clear what is factual or mythological when it comes to Muhammad's life. The historian Tom Holland questioned Islam started in Mecca or that Muhammad was even born there in his documentary on the subject, as did scholars like Patricia Crone. More info here: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam:_The_Untold_Story
@@IslamCritiqued There were multiple "Mohammads". And there are hadiths in the Sunnah where a "Mohammad" was directly quoting Bible verses from Job, Psalm and Isaiah. The hadiths all say that he was begging God for forgiveness by washing him with snow (Job, Psalm) and casting his sin as far as the east is from the west (Psalm) and that he was filthy with sin (Isaiah). When I was browsing through the Sunnah, I came across one of the hadiths that said "wash me with snow, and cold water and hail and I shall be clean as a white garment is washed of filth" and my eyebrows went up in confusion because I recognized that from the Bible. He was quoting directly. I said to myself "man, he is preaching from the Bible", because one of the hadiths say he was praying for a dead man. And get this, in that prayer he was asking God to absolve the man's sins and give him peace using the word absolution as a Christian priest would when saying Last Rites. He was saying the fourth line of the Last Rites, "BY THIS SIGN THOU ART ANOINTED WITH THE GRACE OF THE ATONEMENT OF JESUS CHRIST AND THOU ART ABSOLVED OF ALL PAST ERROR AND FREED TO TAKE YOUR PLACE IN THE WORLD HE HAS PREPARED FOR US." Whichever one of those men spoke, at least one Mohammad was a Catholic priest.
Well presented and critically analyzed. What about the claim in the Quran that Allah told Abraham to use Ishmael for the sacrifice (false)! As this contradicts the original source in the Bible & Torah which God demanded for the sacrifice of Isaac! "... Ask the people of the book!.. Remember???
Muslim interpreters have been divided over Ishmael/Isaac. Today, most Muslims believe it was Ishmael. So yes, a good challenge for the latter for sure!
Thanks, 😊 I wanted to ask you, why Muslims state that Abraham took Ishmael and Hagar to Mecca in order to extablish the Kabba? 🤔 Yesterday I was watching a video of a debate between Dr. Wood and a Muslim apologist where the Muslim stated that Abraham travel to Mecca.
Yeah, maybe just try listening on another device. I've realized it myself, but rarely get comments about it. Yours is the second. I would like to change my audio setup at some point.
Don't Muslims look at the Jews stating Ezra was the son of God 9:30, and Christians stating Jesus is the son of God therefore in their logic or manufactured view they called Jews and Christians Polythiest (pagan)
Thanks once again for highlighting the vast difference between Holy Scripture like the Quran and man-made sayings=hadith. I have no doubt that Abu Huraira was a pious person. But for a person such as him to have spent only 4 years in the Company of Prophet Muhammed and for him to go on to write approx 5400 hadith seems quite perplexing. He, Abu-Huraira got this name because he was known as "The Father of Cats." He was a cat lover. Hence the reason amongst his hadiths are his hatred for dogs. Hence, according to him dogs are not clean, its unlawful for a Muslim to keep a dog etc etc. As for stories of the past, we are bound to find similarities and also differences. However, no such contradictions are in the Quran. The Quran came to re-affirm previous scriptures, it came to correct biases and errors that had crept into Christianity and Judaism. The Quran states that Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian but a true believer in Monotheism, a true Muslim. Thanks for your input.
I am sure, if the quran came to correct errors in the Torah and the Evangelion, you can certainly explain to me why Muhammad said Mary, the mother of Jesus, was the sister of Moses and Aaron. Of course Moses and Aaron had a sister, her name was Miriam (Mariam) but that is not Mary. These 3 figures lived approximately 1300-1500 years before Jesus. What do you mean by correct errors? Sounds more like producing errors......
@@jonson856 Hi. The verse you are referring to from the Quran is at 19:28 I believe. The fact is that the Aaron( Harun) being discussed here, is another pious man who lived at the time of Mary. It is not referring to Aaron, brother of Moses. Mohsin Khan in his translation of the Quran, points to this! In addition, in Islam there is such a thing as being ones sister or brother despite not sharing the same parents. Its by lineage. Its just like the Bible which not only says that Jesus was the Son of God, but in fact there are Sons of God, by the dozen, in the Bible. So do Christians call all of them Jesus brothers??? We are all the children of God, in a metaphorical sense. Thanks for helping to clarify this point. " Without knowledge, anyone can make a fool out of anyone else. By Knowledge, we can ALL learn." Famous saying by Khal A.D2019
"...difference between Holy Scripture like the Quran and man-made sayings=hadith." it's the same with the Quran. The only reason you don't see this is your predisposition not to: th-cam.com/video/7cuTkCGbVlE/w-d-xo.html; th-cam.com/video/cxheJas1hGM/w-d-xo.html
@@sayedf11 Brother, I have recently seen a rapid increase in the number of videos trying to bash Islam/Quran. Because Islam is increasing, there is a movement to curb it. Suppose this has been so, since beginning. Another idiot calls himself Apostate Prophet, he is doing the same. Sadly, they can influence only the ignorant of religion, but there are many in this category. We will use Quranic injunction to: Invite to the Way of your Lord with beautiful preaching. jzk brother.
So, Muslims think prophets are "infallible?" Let's me count the rebuttals: 1. Moses refused to listen to God's word of speaking to the rock, and instead, the prophet struck the rock. (There's a prophetic implication, but I don't think the Muslims understand.) 2. Isaiah said that our righteousness is "as of filthy rags." (Isaiah 64:6. It gets even worse if you read the verse in the original Hebrew. Just a fair warning, the Hebrew version is very graphic.) 3. The same Isaiah, in Chapter 6:5, says that he has "unclean lips" when seeing the Lord of Hosts. 4. Jonah ran away instead of preaching to Ninevah. 5. In Stephen's testimony before the Sanhedrin, Abraham didn't listen to God when the Lord told him to move to the county Jehovah wanted. Instead, Abraham (sorry that I'm not using Abhram) went up river. Need I post more.
Nice list. I hadn't considered that angle before, although you'd have to do it form the Islamic versions of the stories for it to work for a Muslim. Otherwise, they'll just claim the imperfections of the prohpets are due to "corruption" in the Bible.
Hello, Sarah wasn't Abraham's sister or half-sister. He lied to save his own life. Abraham's father, Teran, had three sons Abram, Nahor and Harán. Teran was 205 years old when he died. This is from the Torah Bere'shit 11.
To my knowledge, the text you cited does NOT say that his father did not have a daughter. However, "Therefore a man will abandon." It was taught: a convert that converted and was married to his sister, whether from the mother or the father - it is acceptable, according to Rabbi Meir. The Sages say: from the mother it is acceptable, from the father, it must be established that he does not worship idols. A refutation arose: does it not say: "And moreover, she is my sister, the daughter of my father..." (Genesis 20:12)!" -Bereishit Rabbah
@@IslamCritiqued In the biblical genealogies we are told when the patriarchs had daughters and the Lord prohibited incest in Leviticus so the Lord doesn't contradict his word. The Jewish Study Bible states that the only incestuous relationship in Abraham's family was Nahor and Milcah, who were uncle and nice. If Sarah was Abraham's sister or half-sister it would have mentioned it in Genesis 11:29.
@Islam Safari Yet the freeing of slaves is one of the best things a Muslim can do. Btw did you get permission from Islam critiqued to upload one of his videos?
Strange that Muslims would align with Hagar, an Egyptian slave woman, and Ishmael, a wild man (Genesis 16:12). The theological implications are mind-blowing. (I don't know if said Muslims align themselves with Esau, but that would be intriguing.)
You contradicted yourself in 1:17 since you said they immigrated there in the first place. The Jewish Hebrews who immigrated there as a result of being brtually ethnically cleansed by the Romans in the Roman-Jevvish wars were ethnically Hebrews. There is no such thing as "ethnically Arab" since "Arab" is not an ethnicity. The "Arab" identity that we know today is a result of Arabist-lsIamic conquests and propaganda. The same is true for the "Arabic" language which didn't really exist before lsIam. The term "Arab" originally describe someone who is a nomad of the desert, similar to how the term "Bedouin" is understood, and doesn't denote an ethnic group whatsoever. Nowdays when people speak of "Arabs" what they really mean is "ArabISTS" = Pan-Arabists, which is tied to the ideology of Pan-Arabism. As for the so-called "Arabic" language - it's actually mixture of other languages - Himyaritic, Aramaic and Hebrew, with a little bit of Greek, Persian, and Ethiopic. This mixture is what was eventually put into the "canonical" Quran and was spread with the Arabist-lsIamic conquests. This "Arabic" mixture language wasn't widely spoken prior to that (even inside the area that now inaccurately called the "Arabian Peninsula"). It's more accurate to use terms such as: Arabist, Bedouin, Hijazi than "Arab". A Morrocan Arabist for example is almost certainly ethnically Berber/Imazigh and not a Hijazi Bedouin. Arabist-lsIamic propaganda seeks to erase any ethnic trace of the places it conquers and replace it with "Arab".
"You contradicted yourself in 1:17 since you said they immigrated there in the first place." Jewish communities existed in Arabia by the end of the 1st century CE. They, as well as Christians, continued to emigrate over the following centuries. This is the clear meaning of what I said. If it wasn't clear then, it should be now. While "Arab" is not a gentilic term, as I have noted elsewhere, for the purposes of this video I've adopting Firestone's usage of the term. This usage is convenient, as it is how "Arab" is commonly understood. I'm not sure what your point is about Arabic. Every known language has sister languages, cognates...etc.
If they immigrated there and married among themselves they weren't Hijazi Bedouins (what you inaccruately called "ethnically Arab"). How "Arab" is commonly understood (simplistically adopting the Arabist-lsIamic narrative) is wrong, and thats what I explained in my comment. I don't know what you mean by "sister language" but if you mean a similarity between languages then it's completely different than the case of Arabic which is a creation out of a mixture of other languages rather than an independant language that happens to share similarity due to a pre-historic common origin. "Arabic" didn't exist before lsIam, and should actually be called Quranic or Quranic Hijazi Bedouin mixture rather than "Arabic". By the way, in regards to the Arabist-Ishmaelite propaganda: The notion that Hijazi Bedouins (or worse yet - a bigger group of Peninsula Bedouins) descend from Ishmael is an lsIamic invention. MusIims hijacked this notion in order to legitimize their conquests, rule and religious doctrine. In pre-lsIamic times such a notion did not exist. In fact, even in the lsIamic sources themselves we can find clues on how early MusIims tried to cover up pre-lsIamic heritage: The Prophet said on the authority of Ubayy bin Ka'b: "If anyone proudly asserts his descent in the manner of the pre-lsIamic people, tell him to bite his father's penis, and do not use a euphemism." [Hadith - Mishkat Al-Masabih, Vol. 2, p. 1021] The Bedouin tribes of the Peninsula had lived in the area long before the supposed time Ishmael even existed. It's interesting to note in the lsIamic sources for passages such this: Umar Ibn al-Khattab said of the Bedouin, "They are the origin of the Arabs…". [Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 5, Book 57, Number 50] The truth is that if Ishmael even existed, or was based on a real person, he was a Hebrew man for all intents and purposes. Aside from his Hebrew name and heritage, we know that historically centuries before Muhammad was born Jevvs were named Ishmael (such as Ishamel ben Ntanya, Rabi Ishmael ben Elisha and others). There are also even older records for Jevvs using the name Ishmael, such as a tablet found at the site of Tel Halif in Syria, dated to the 7th century BCE. Ishmael was part of the Hebrew Jevvish heritage centuries before Arabist Muslims stole it and hijacked the name and his heritage for themselves, to serve their Arabist-lsIamic agenda.
"The notion that Hijazi Bedouins (or worse yet - a bigger group of Peninsula Bedouins) descend from Ishmael is an lsIamic invention. MusIims hijacked this notion in order to legitimize their conquests, rule and religious doctrine. In pre-lsIamic times such a notion did not exist." I specifically said this in the video. We do find stories of a couple different "Ishmael's" in the Islamic texts. Regarding the primary sources, there is little to say. The Quran mentions him mostly as a secondary figure. A plausible reason for this would be the that Islam had relatively few sources to draw from. And the main sources with Ishmael traidition (Jewish) were decidedly negative.
@@humansdosuck I think after the Jews (and heretical Christians) were driven out of Israel, tehy even settled as far as Yemen. I read something somwhere but forgot the source. And those Jews and Christians were later massacred by the "arabs".
@@humansdosuck _"Arabic" didn't exist before lsIam, and should actually be called Quranic or Quranic Hijazi Bedouin mixture rather than "Arabic"._ This is certainly false. The Quran has influenced the grammar and thus is a factor in how Arabic has changed. (Arabic is not unique like this - all languages change over time.) But, Arabic certainly already existed. We have Arabic texts that predate the Quran, for example.
The Qur'an doesn't quote stories of prophets to narrate history, the main purpose is to deliver a lesson a message. But that doesn't mean that I think their not correct Muslims do not believe that prophets are sinless. We believe they do have some sins but their Def better than ordinary people. If they weren't then why would God select them to be a prophet
Does the Quran contain history? And do you agree that the narrations cited in this video are contrived? "Muslims do not believe that prophets are sinless." Many Muslims do, many of them here on my channel.
@@sayedf11 _"created by John ...as it contradict the beginning in GEN "_ Um no, John never says Jesus was created. He says the exact opposite. Where do you get this nonsense from?
Allah is the one and only god from the beginning of time,he taught humans everything even religion,Allah Almighty started the first religion from the beginning he sent a messenger to every nation (this is explicitly mentioned in Quran) to preach his divine revelations whether it was written or orally transmitted teachings it does not matter now since these are all lost,corrupted or exist as Folklores,myths,legends,Ancient religions and fairy tales however all of these holds a truth in them,Quran is the only divine revelation that is not corrupt, it's completely perfect.. hate it or love it, it's the truth and Islam haters are just jealous, As for the similarity it's normal they're from one god who is Allah,I like to hear and read about these specially when it resembles stories from Quran it strengthen my faith,it won't make me doubt my faith at all,if any Muslims doubted Islam because of it then he has no one to blame but himself for lack of knowledge probably this Muslim doesn't even read Quran, you Christians hate it when people say "Jesus is a copy from Dionysus" or Krishna and "virgin Mary is a copy from Maya the mother of Buddha" because your bible did not give you no hint to refute it with. Atheists say all religions are stolen from old legends and Folklores .... as a Muslim who studied and learned my religion enough all thanks to Allah, i say nobody plagiarized or copied from anyone these are all possibly stories of real prophets,angels and prophecies from Allah's divine revelation that has been corrupted through times maybe even long time ago since the beginning of humanity and the truth got mix with falsehood and packing it up with the fact that there are prophets Allah did not tell us about in Quran from 40:78 and 14:9 where Allah said that there is nations only he knows and also with 2:213 and 10:19 where Allah said humans were on one faith but they differed....So it's very normal for a truth to be transmitted between people through time in many ways,if you have a brain inside that head of yours instead of a rock you will realize that there is no way that all of these ancient religions and legends are similar to each other and to the Abrahamic religions from simply.. nothing. Few examples -Man created from clay is in the bible and Quran but also in Chinese,Greek ,Egyptian mythology -Leviathan is in the bible similar to jörmungandr in the Norse mythology and so many others. -Stories like the epic of Gilgamesh or epic of Atrahasis they say it's older than Noah's flood..which is in the bible and Quran. it's fine for me, it could be an old prophecy revealed by Allah of prophet Noah himself... heard during that time and was corrupted, Adam was the first prophet but Noah was the first messenger in Islam. lastly, this comment will refute everything from this videos of yours and everything you said to "islam stolen from paganism" to "Allah is moon god" and everything like these stupid infidels ideas, don't let us repeat that ISLAM EXIST FROM THE START OK it doesn't matter if it was called islam or something else,pre-islamic Arab heard of a god name Allah before but mixed this truth with so many ridiculous things like giving him daughters or making him a moon god...etc. know that every command Allah gave to Muslims in the Quran is already in the bible even though it's corrupt, what do you all have against us?Nothing, you are just wrongdoers. this is enough for me to know truly no god but one god Allah the all-wise and all- knowing any other god are a nobody.
“this comment will refute everything from this videos of yours and everything you said to "islam stolen from paganism" to "Allah is moon god” Your comment proves you didn’t even watch the video. Watch the video before responding.
@@IslamCritiqued No honestly i did not watch all of it,it's obvious what you trying to proves from only the title,the comment still refute your video and also your Muhammad and Merkabah Mysticism video,but i can see that you have no reply, i hope you understood now and stop making such a videos.
To the respected viewers, what Islam critiques is trying to deceive you that Islam has no connection with Ibrahim and Jews and Christians, I request you to read the quraan yourself don't accept what critiques of Islam present short ill views, go to source and find complete information. You will find the God who talked to prophet Ibrahim, Moses, Jesus and other prophets is talking to prophet Mohammad as well. I am happy that these people giving chance people to study quraan and find the truth themselves. These people pick the verse of quraan saying quraan orders to punish a person severely, I am asking did quraan say catch a passerby and punish severely? Quraan gives a solution how to protect the society. Please don't be deceived by sweet voices think for your sake. Islam is the truth and will enter every single door that's not my word but the word of owner of this universe and He is only one. If anyone wants guidance turn to only one creator ask guidance from, He will not let you fall into satanic trap.
I would also ask you to cite specifically what you disagree with in this video. This video clearly demonstrates how Muslims would add to existing traditions to create their own history. Elsewhere, I've focused on some specific verses in the Quran as well as narrations in the hadith and shown that they do not come from God or a prophet of God: th-cam.com/play/PLVwt18wNX1gyR4zQBIso2WFRecAojyJb4.html
@@IslamCritiqued do you promote Islam, you say you prove verses of the quraan not from God, do you convince about those verses, also the verses from God,( challenge still stands for fourteen centuries bring few verses like quraan, you are in a position to accept that) the hadith from Prophet and other sources. And your book that has been written by third and fourth hand without any record, in fact from stories is direct from God. Can you make out?
Again, if you have a specific argument with what I've presented, bring it. "And your book that has been written...." yeah yeah. Same old thing. Muslims can't defend their religion so they attack Christianity instead. Don't waste my time.
@@IslamCritiqued First thing you are quoting another Islamic critiques historian to support your points, quote Gibbon the best and well knowb historian. I am asking why did Christians fled the Romans persecution whenever Romans accepted Christianity? You must know that the true Christians were Unitarian and believe Jesus was only a prophet and they were persecuted and fled. But why did they go to a deserted place where life was hard and not to a fertile place? Both Jews and Christians knew the dwelling place of last and final messenger. You together with your favourite historian are trying to prove that the legends of Arabs were inserted into quraan, that's stupidity, the Arabs were astonished of quraanic style and thought this is work of magician. It needs volume to explain everything. In short you are misleading people increasing devil's membership. My time is more precious than yours.
If you work for it, the god of the quran may love you back. Though his love is thin, and can be lost. You may get to within a cubit of paradise before his decree takes over and he sends you to hell: sunnah.com/bukhari/82/1. Maybe he created you for hell from your father's loins: sunnah.com/muslim/46/47. Also, Allah "loves" you so much that you'll get tortured in the grave after death, and then have to pass though the flames of hell after which point you'll retaliate on other Muslims for sins committed in this life. sunnah.com/bukhari/46/1; sunnah.com/bukhari/23/115 That's the forgiveness and love of allah...wow. Leave a lot to be desired. Also, why would you want to be a part of a religion that simply constructs its history, as I show in this video?
@Islam Safari How do you know Quran has mistakes.bcoz our Prophet Muhammad couldn't read or write so how he could copie other books. Muhammad just spoke to us what angle said to him from Allah. If you believe that Quran has mistakes then you are not a Muslim. One more thing our Creator Almighty Allah is not very far from us but we are not able to catch him & obey to him
@Islam Safari it's not for only our Muslim womens Muhammad said it for all women's he didn't add it to as religious differences that's why we Muslims Women's wear Hijab & not trying to act like more attractive to men. If all women's obey to Quran & wear Hijab then they will be in jannah insha Allah & Modelling, bikini is totally Haram .if any women from this industry then she will be in Jahannam / hell & no one can save her.
Now see Media is doing it everywhere like making Model , to provoke women's to wear bikini which is totally Haram in islam these kind of sins won't be forgiven. One more thing Luxurious lifestyle is totally Haram in Islam. bcoz when a men get everything in this life then he forget what is the purpose of life why Allah sent us to this beautiful world
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [2/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qJbQs_nhjD4/mqdefault.jpg)
In this video we look at the form of an Abrahamic tradition as attributed to one of the most prolific hadith narrators, Abu Hurayra. This is yet another video containing information most Muslims have not been exposed to. Predictably, as a response in the comments section below, we will see personal attacks as well as polemics against Christianity.
For any interested in possible relevant ancient near eastern background to Abraham's marriage to Sarah: “Thou art my sister was technically true (20:12), and E. A. Speiser has drawn attention to the esteem in which the Hurrians (influential at Haran) held the wife-sister relationship: a husband would even legally adopt his wife as sister to increase his authority and the status of the marriage." -Kidner, D. (1967). Genesis: An Introduction and Commentary (Vol. 1, p. 127). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Regardless, the Biblical accounts faithfully record the actions, whether good or bad, of Biblical characters- this includes prophets. Biblical writers were not driven by such apologetic concerns when recording their accounts. For those well versed in Biblical theology, we expect perfection in the next life, not this one.
“One result of the great changes brought about by Islamic domination of the Arabian Peninsula was that the once colorful fabric representing the diverse religio-cultural expressions of the sixth and seventh century Arabia survived only as disjointed remnants. Some pre-Islamic legends survived through reinterpretation according to the developing religious standards of early Islam. But more often, certain bits and pieces of ancient tales survived as they were reworked into the legends, evolving to serve as foundations for the newly developing religious system…one such source containing material bearing strong similarities to Biblicist and indigenous pre-Islamic tradition is the revelation known as the Quran.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.7
“Some material deriving from Biblicist and pre-Islamic pagan environments had become so well integrated into Islamic lore that they were included in the most respected collections and cited freely in authoritative exegesis of the Quran.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.10
“In fact, however, stories or legends that are specifically designated by medieval Muslim scholars as Israelite Tales cannot be found in Jewish literature- at least not as they are found in Islamic sources…a story deemed by Islam as an Israelite Tale is actually…a unique and authentically Islamic tale.” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.13
“The evidence…can be found in Arabic genealogies, which appear to connect the Northern Arabs and the tribe of Muhammad to Hagar and Ishmael only in late- that is, Islamic-texts. Pre-Islamic pagan Arab genealogies appear to have no awareness or concern for the connection…” -Firestone, Journeys in the Holy Lands, p.37
“It was said: The king had a daughter of extreme goodness and beauty [cf. Gen 12:11] named Hagar…Then Gabriel came to Abraham and gave him the good news that God would provide him with a child through…Hagar a son through whom would appear a prophet by the name of Muhammad, the seal of the prophets…when she [Hagar] gave birth to Ishmael, his face shone like the moon with the light of our prophet Muhammad.” -Al-Kisa’i’s, cited from Firestone, -Journeys in the Holy Lands p.41
@T 1985 Hey, look, another Muslim NOT defending his religion. Did you even watch the video?
Islam Critiqued awesome !
T 1985 are u saying allah has a son named Jesus Christ ? Muhammad is dead and never ever in the bible !
@David Doss don't let him deflect. Make him defend his religion.
T 1985 show me where allah met muhammad in Quran 😂😂 better still call debatetv on Skype !
I've always found it weird how the Islamic texts go out of their way to describe each individual prophet as beautiful and describing their facial hair and whatever. Very strange indeed.
Physical appearance is very important in Islam. We see this in numerous texts.
@@IslamCritiqued
If physical appearance is so important to them, why do some muslim women cover themselves with what looks like blankets with a narrow strip across the eyes so they can see where they are going. Very odd. Look at the way the Gospel of Mark 1, 6 describes John the Baptist's appearance. Muslims would not approve. It's a carnally minded religion with no spiritual discernment whatsoever. They remind me of Joseph Smith's religion of Mormonism.
I'm referring more to the physical appearance of Muhammad which is described over and over in the narrations. There are some khutbah's on TH-cam talking about how good looking he was. Some are comical
@@IslamCritiqued Islam's obsession with men is quite weird
@Hisham Malik Very sus man
dude is looking good ;)
Keep up the important work.
Blessings!
The information in the video shone brighter than moon that I had to watch it twice.
A hard hitting episode once again. Thank you. I had always wandered why Hagar only featured in Hadith and never in the Koran. (But Sarah does feature in Koran).
"The information in the video shone brighter than moon..." I like that! Glad you enjoyed.
Your scholarly approach is amazing. I love your presentations very educational.
Thanks for your comment!
Just recently found your channel through David Wood's channel and I got to say, I'm loving it! People like you make the Christian Faith taste wholesome sweeter with a deeper, stronger sense of security & assurance in Christ alone. Thank you IC.
Your last conclusion is soooo right. Every time I post something critical about Islam quoting Quran or Hadith, I expect nothing else in response then that it's abrogated (Quran), weak (Hadiths) or rebuked by scholar soandso (both)
Excellent brother u r doing a fabulous job...God bless u
Glad you enjoyed! God bless
This is great, you should do more of this, just to expose Islam and it’s plagiarism
❤ this is really interesting. I’m reading crossroads to Islam and Early Islam now, two books that really make you think critically.
*UBARIKIWE SANA* all the way from *EAST AFRICA* may you be blessed my brother in *CHRIST*
love this channel thank you Dave Wood for showing it learning lots
Thanks for the feedback! Glad you’re enjoying it
Hello IC. You are so professional and polite and very respectful. Thanks for all the research that your doing. You're such a blessing. Thank you IC.
love from David Wood to you...much love from Africa... God bless you
Spread the gospel bro
Brother I like the way you explain -calm and humble. Keep it up
Are you familiair with some of Patricia Crone’s work? I read an interesting paper of her on the Jewish and Babylonian roots of the Islamic Harut and Marut.
Yes, she was a brilliant scholar! I recommend her work if you're not familiar with it.
Always enjoy listening and watching your videos, very educational with good backing up materials. God bless 👍
Glad you enjoyed!
Dan Gibson’s work on Petra seems convincing. The pre-Islamic people were, according to Mr. Gibson, the Nabateans.
I agree his work is convincing. However, we must be nuanced, in my opinion. In practice (i.e. worshiping the black stone), and in Quranic/Hadith geography we do see Nabataean parallels. However, in the texts, we see Jewish/Christian/apocryphal/pseudepigraphical influence overwhelmingly. To add to this, we see in these sources the types of oral tradition that we see from pre-Islamic Arabian poets as well. We also see from Islamic literature the push to move historical events (Abraham, Moses) south into Arabia. So in many ways the texts are a good fit for Arabia. I think we need to recognize first, as Gibson does, the southern shift of Islam- from Petra to Arabia. And with this, we need to recognize that the primary sources of Islam (I'm including the quran as well) developed during and after that shift took place. In short, both could be true, we just have to remember that "Muhammad" the man is far removed from the texts that describe him, both in time and in geography.
Islam Critiqued as an aside, what I enjoyed most about Mr. Gibson’s book Pre Islamic Geography was his discussion about the early tribal societies mention, in passing as it were, in Genesis that were close to the Israelites and how these early stories fit better with Petra, especially the story of Hagar, the well of Zam Zam, and the name of Petra as the Mother of All Colonies. Abraham’s activities in Islamic sources seem to fit better too. Of course this does nothing for the Islamic case. However this seems to be our problem rather than theirs.
Did you read my comment above? As someone also familiar with Gibson's work, I was wondering if you think that theory meshes with his work.
I think Gibson makes a good argumen to that effect.
Islam Critiqued I did read your comment and largely agreed with it.
Dude I love your intellectual academic expositions
Glad you enjoyed!
You had me at “Welcome” Great stuff! Keep up the great work for Christ.
Glad you enjoyed!
Your presentation of facts is perfect and very logical and reasonable for any Muslim would believe. Your voice is calming and convincing. Lastly, your nice on the eyes
You never failed to amaze us.... totally true and agree on this one... well done, Sir😉
Glad you enjoyed emma!
islamic exegesis - i mean - islamic exe jesus.
Aren't you so amazed at how Christian he is, i.e. he has to twist the facts so badly to feel as if he's gotten a pin fall?
Too bad he still cannot provide us with clear and explicit biblical evidence in which his triplets god declares himself by himself as being made up of 3 co-equal yet distinct persons and names the 3 persons all by himself!
@@esabdalla 🤔 have you read ?? And what has that HAve to do with the topic he is addressing?? Quran is a incomplete book full of plagiarism from man made sources
@@albusai Muslims always change the topic when they don´t have an argument like you can talk about Islam and they will change the topic from talking Islam to the trinity.
There is no point of debating or arguing with Muslims because they will lie and change the topic and they already made up their minds before even engaging with you so every answer that you give to them will always be wrong in their eyes and they will argue back and forth with you until they´re blue in the face and then leave.
Trust me, you will have an easier time teaching a pig advanced calculus than teaching a Muslim basic christian doctrine that anyone at catholic or any christian school can answer.
Thanks for equipping us.
Very welcome! Use the material where ever you want.
Great information! Keep up this much needed ministry brother
Colin, thank you for yet another superbly academic and manifestly inspired presentation on an important aspect of Islam that I, and a good many others, were largely unaware of. Thank you so very much for all the effort and work that goes into this, in terms of research, in terms of analysis, in terms of attention to detail, and also in terms of a flawless delivery in beautiful and clear English.
I have a question unrelated specifically to this topic, but I have the impression you may be able to answer it for me. Jay Smith mentions that the version of the Qur'an that is widely and almost universally promulgated in the west and in many parts of the Arab world or Muslim world is a version that was canonized in 1924, a version that was not only canonized in 1924 but fashioned in the seven years prior to that canonization. Jay Smith reports that this version of the Qur'an was first produced in Cairo Egypt, and that several decades later religious Authority in Saudi Arabia decreed that this 1924 version would be and should be the version to use for all translations to foreign languages and for study for the faithful.
However, Jay Smith and you have pointed out that Turkey had and has an edition of the Qur'an that differs from other versions, and in fact differences among various editions of the Qur'an is not a rare phenomenon but is the norm.
My specific question is regarding the Arabic edition of the Qur'an that was preserved among the Turks. Did the Turks switch to the 1924 version of the Qur'an, did the Turks somewhat adapt or modify their version of the Qur'an to the 1924 canonized edition, and if the Turks ever switched or ever altered their version of a Quran to make it conform to the 1924 standardized version, in what year the Turks do this?
My question is for my own curiosity's sake. I would like to be able to have a look at the Turks' Arabic version of the Qur'an. I would in fact like to purchase a copy of the Qur'an as the Ottomans preserved it, even by buying a fairly inexpensive Edition printed in the 20th century. I just need to know at what point any changes would have been made in the Turkish print edition of the Qur'an to make it conform to the 1924 edition, if any changes were ever made.
I am hoping that you can just rattle off an answer like 1956 or 1928, as I am certainly not trying to add academic burden to your shoulders; I can see that you are a man on a mission.
Not only that, but the 1924 edition was produced because of the complaints Muslim clerics received about the differences in the Qurans that were being distributed in schools. Also, it is not a Quran in Turkey, rather, a manuscript. Briefly, the manuscripts all differ, and we're up to 31 Arabic Qurans now. Interesting, what many of the corrections show is that the scribes were attempting to bring them into conformity with what we now know as the 1924 edition.
@@IslamCritiqued I had no idea. That is fascinating. So did Turkey automatically adopt the 1924 edition? I am astonished even indignant that Muslim scholars carry on the pretence of an unchanged Qur'an from the days of Muhammed when it has only been unchanged since 1924.
It was standardized by Cairo. Also, it hasn't been unchanged since 1924. A couple of revisions followed to address some issues that were missed.
It's difficult to see where the line is between Muslim academics who affirm the Quran is unchanged and those who don't. Certainly, there are many who admit there are numerous changes, but this information doesn't filter down very well. Then the rebuttal comes, "the text doesn't matter, since MILLIONS of people memorized it."
@@jamesweller1965 To flesh out the story a bit. There were (I believe) 36 "standard" Qurans prior to 1924 - one for each of the classic schools of transmission. Cairo decided to adopt one of those (Hafs) for use in their schools so that everyone was on the same page. The model worked, so others began to adopt it. Soon Egypt adopted in nationally. Later, Saudi Arabia canonized it for "all" of the Arabic-speaking world. That was not until 1980 or so. That greatly accelerated the adoption, but some hold outs remain even today. Hafs is about 95% of Arabic Qurans, but most of the other 35 can still be found in use - I believe Jay and Hatun have tracked down 30 or 32 of the 36.
Prior to 1924 Hafs was already dominant. This is due to an accident of history - it happened to be the first one printed using a printing press - not anything special about it. The versions aren't massively different, but rather have the typical amount of variation one finds from handwritten manuscripts. The problem for Muslims is 1) they lie about "perfect preservation" as an "authenticating miracle" and thus this info is devastating to people when they learn it. 2) There is no critical edition of the Quran (unlike Bible) because Muslims are afraid of losing the perfect preservation myth. This means the original text is far less certain than the original Biblical text.
@@ReasonedAnswers Thank you for that careful and detailed response. Thank you for getting solid information out to the world. The truth will prevail thanks to efforts like yours.
Thanks again for this excellent research...
You're welcome!
Absolutely brilliant study done by you. It confirms that their books have no foundation and importantly cannot be believed.
Glad you enjoyed!
@@aaabrams1889 God Almighty only!
@@sayedf11 _"Miracles Quran MENTION"_ Of course none of these verse say anything remotely like what you claim they say, but I did have to laugh at this one: "21 104 future collapse of universe." That would contradict known science as the universe will not collapse but instead continue to expand forever. OOPS!
Thanks so much for your commitment. Keep it up! With islam there is an endless comedy. Abu bakir, Bakari and Moe. Whoop whoop whoop!
Heading to the place the sunsets tomorrow, some hot tubbing and barbeque. Out
Distinction between infallibility and impeccability required. Infallibility means cannot err, impeccability means cannot sin. All the same great video.
There's really no such distinction as far as I can tell in Islamic theology- infallibility refers to his perfect nature, err, sin, or what have you.
@@IslamCritiqued ok. Thanks. That's interesting if it is the case. It must be an Arabic concept that we are translating imprecisely. Essentially we are dealing with perfection.
Right it's 'ismah' and it's history and reception among different sects is quite diverse but for Shia at least it is essentially superman qualities
Yeah if you know of any texts that make this theological distinction, let me know. To my knowledge, Islamic theology is rarely, if ever, that precise.
"...but for Shia at least it is essentially superman qualities" Ahhh yes. That sounds about right.
Under, "why was this pre-Islamic story kept within Islam" I would add that it may have just been a well-known and well-circulated story that wasn't going anywhere, therefore Islamic authorities thought it best to sanitize and utilize it for their own purposes rather than leave it as was.
This was what I assume happened with certain pre-Christian tales that made it into explicitly Christian works such as The Golden Legend. Stories about the local hero were going to persist one way or the other, so the Church might as well mint an "authorized" version.
It is worth remembering that in both cases (early medieval Europe and Arabia) the societies were not so literate that the general populace would be able to research and compare and determine what material was pre-Christian/Islamic and what was post. A child being raised on stories of Abraham and Dhul Qarnayn in an Islamic context would have no reason to suppose they were somehow un- or pre-Islamic.
Great information ! Truly anointed
Great video and very very insightful.
Glad you enjoyed!
Again great and we'll researched information.
The hadiths and Sunnah keep mentioning Syria, as though Syria was so important. I wondered why Syria would be so important that they are always talking about it and came across a hadith in which Abu Huraira said that the prophet said the Dajjal would descend at the White Minaret in Damascus.
The problem is that "Mohammad" died in 632, and the White Minaret was built in 634. The speaker says the White Minaret as though it was already there in Damascus so this leaves several options for this problem.
1: There was more than one Mohammad.
2: It was spoken by someone else they claim was Mohammad.
3: Mohammad had a time machine.
4: It was merely attributed to Mohammad.
There are many instances in which there seems to be more than one Mohammad, because there is a lack of continuity in the speeches, and they are so contradictory with each other. For instance, it is claimed Mohammad was born in Mecca, yet it is also implied he was born in Syria and in Petra. At least one Mohammad preached from the Bible, directly quoting verses from Job, Psalm and Isaiah. One Mohammad said that some man he knew had to crawl through the snow as a punishment. Since when does Mecca get snow? That means a Mohammad was from an area where there was snow, otherwise how would the Yathrib Arabs even know what snow was if they had never seen it?
Anyway, I don't know if there were multiple men they claimed was the one Mohammad, but they repeat stories of other men doing things and then say "I heard the prophet say", well, which prophet? The Mohammad was attached by the writer of the hadith. Any time you see Mohammad in the Quran, it was inserted by the translator and not directly written.
Excellent post.
My guess is you’re familiar with Dan Gibson’s work.
@@aaabrams1889 The problem is that YOU do believe Mohammad was a PROPHET...ha ha ha
@@sayedf11 _"u always on the replying ends....but u never learn....just wasting ppls time..."_ What an ironic statement coming from you.
Ash-Sham includes Palestine, including JERUSALEM
This is my favorite site to learn about the material found in the false religion of Islam!
Just wait until the next vid...
I bet pre-Islamic Arabia was actually a very diverse and culturally beautiful place. Then Muhammad and the islamists came in and decimated the religious and cultural fabric of that part of the Levant and permanently destroyed the Christian, jewish and pagan settlements. Arabia would have been better off pagan.
The crested moon of Islam is a relic from the tribes of Arabs that worshipped a moon God(The man in the moon) who was also called Allah.
alla was the arab moon goddess, she had the biggests statue of all the 360 ka'aba gods.
she also had three daughters, the trinity of arabia
You do such an excellent job with these videos about Islam.
I noticed something today, do not know if youtube did it on purpose or it was a glitch.
I had subscribed to you a few weeks ago, then I just noticed I got unsub.
Weird.
Subscribing again, and will keep an eye if it happens again.
Keep up your great work!!! :)
I’ve heard TH-cam does this stuff to channels they don’t like. But my channel isn’t big enough to be in their radar I’m sure.
nice work brother.
Thanks for your very informative videos.
Very welcome!
GOD BLESS.
Hagar being the daughter of a king reminds me of the south korean "christian" end time sect called ShinChonJi. Their spiritual leader, Lee Man Hee, when he visited us in Berlin (and i was dragged to the place so i would listen to him ... At that time my mother was part of the sect, but didn't know they were a sect) they presented him like a king. A scepter, a big kingly chair, in red and gold, and even announcing that he was a descendant of some korean king pffff ahahaha.
it's almost like this pattern is the modus operandi of all sects, they always try to attach themselves to something or someone bigger and better so they can improve their status.
I saw it in the Korean sect, and we see it with Islam
I think I've heard something about them, though I can't remember. Do they believe in reincarnation?
@@IslamCritiqued ouff i would have to wake my mother and ask her ^^"
Well what i still remember is that hey built their own City, 4 outer walls with the same length and each with 3 gates. Basically it's supposed to be built as described in revelations lol.
I think they do believe in reincarnation but only after judgement day. Something about 144000 people in the book of Life being the highest ranked people in gods paradise blabla... Funnily their sect far exceeded that number now at 200000 XD
And this lee Man hee is supposed to replace Jesus and he "proved" that by having ridden a flying white horse (in his delusions XD) and sending 7 letters to 7 churches in korea XD
His followers believe he is immortal lololol XD
That being said, Korean sects are extremely dangerous. I am currently at the technical University Berlin and i know of the shinchonji and the "church of mother God" both trying to actively lure innocent and naive Christians into their sects :/
Sorry for the many XD s
Thanks for your response!
@@IslamCritiqued i have to thank you :D always gives me a fuzzy feeling when the TH-camr engages with his audience :D
"always gives me a fuzzy feeling" hahahaha well I guess you just got another one.
Great n true informations n also the history is also discussed in very comprehensive way, thanks for sharing, God bless
Glad you enjoyed!
Good job bro
Brother Colin: The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 1 Verses 1 to 16 speak of the genealogy of Jesus Christ. Also Genesis Chapter 17 Verse 20 states that Ishmael was blessed by God and begot twelve prince's. So if our Muslim friends claim that their Prophet Mohammad was a descendant of Ishmael, was Mohammad or anyone else able to trace his (Prophet Mohammad's) genealogy to Ishmael? Which of the twelve prince's genealogy is Mohammad from?
I cover that topic toward the end of this video. th-cam.com/video/Hw4ZISSu2Ec/w-d-xo.html
@sayedf11 deal with the data: th-cam.com/play/PLVwt18wNX1gzrNAcvsNgLpIdPXBiVYR2Q.html
@sayedf11: This is a TH-cam video which refutes the claim that the Islamic Prophet Mohammad was mentioned in Song of Solomon 5:16. Link Below. 👇
th-cam.com/video/2gJTLtbIE5g/w-d-xo.html
@sayedf11: John 4:16 refuted in this TH-cam video. Link Below. 👇
th-cam.com/video/ADjRvO3jmLA/w-d-xo.html
What was the Islamic Prophet Mohammad, a human or a spirit?
I believe in one verse of the Qur'an, 83:13: When Our verses are recited to him, he says, "Legends of the former peoples." But, to match your video, I would insert the word 'Modified' before 'Legends'.
Muslims fully realize mohammed used these fables and stories, but can't admit he did.
This occurs a couple times, as well as the "poet/mad poet" accusation. I agree- these are about as close to truth as the Quran gets.
there's no verse in the Quran mention ABRAHAM offer up his son ISHMAEL as a burnt offering..
@@T1985-q1d Perhaps then you can share your wisdom?
Go away, troll. You brought this up previously and then clarified that adding a mem made the "verb into a noun". You have no idea what you're talking about. Defend your religion, coward.
@@T1985-q1d your allah is just another name for SATAN.
JEHOVAH is GOD of both the CHRISTIANS and JEWS.
EXODUS 6:3;
ISAIAH 12:2;
ISAIAH 26:4;
PSALM 83:18.
What nationality was ABRAHAM??
@@T1985-q1d are you trying to imply that meshullam means Muslim? XD
Does the word Muslim not come from Islam? And Islam means "to surrender" or "to submit".
But as i googled with meshullam, it means devoted or befriended. So the meaning is totally different.
If you want to go with the phonetic fallacy, at least do it 100%. Allahu akbar from now on means "acursed mouse". Thank you for admitting that your god is cursed.
"Allahu akbar " means "G-d is Great" in the bible." Akbar means "mouse" in Hebrew. "Allahu" isn't even a word in Hebrew. I've had enough of your nonsense. All you do is clog up the comments.
God Bless you Brother. Lord Have Mercy.
Please do more of the MASSIVE Plagiarism of the surrounding faiths by Islam!
More to come!
Thank you for the information.
Well presented, bless you bro .
Gob bless Miki!
Do you take requests?
What do you think about gen 18?
Abraham was visited by 3 visitors.
Many sources say they were angels, but Abraham calls them Adonay. A term used to address Yaweh.
Gen 18:1 "And YHWH appeared to him..." don't be confused by the "angel" language. I have a video that will interface with this topic soon that you will find helpful.
@@IslamCritiqued Awesome...thank you. Looking forward to it.
Sure thing. The short story is the Hebrew term for angel is actually VERY versatile. Don't think of "angel" (or the Hebrew behind it) as being an ontological category. I'll demonstrate this thoroughly while addressing a video by the Trinity Delusion. So look for that one.
Waiting on Sayedf11 is like watching Wimbledon...
*You know it's coming back over net* 😁😁😂
Wait for it...
@Qui Creva Sp *copy-pasted spamming of MISREPRESENTED Christians sites" there I fixed it =P
Brother can u say from where the story of zimri of golden calf came.?
as always educative informative fine video....
Thank you Gerald!
The Nabateans, the group most likely to be the primary pre-Islamic people, were camel traders that defended their trade source by fabricating tall tales about where their trade items came from and how hard these were to obtain in order to justify the exorbitant prices they charged. Defending claims against all comers was just part of haggling or bargaining. All social customs and traditions that come under the rubric of religion provide some training for getting on in the world. Forcing the children to defend the indefensible was just good business training. The modern Islamic adherents are simply employing, albeit unconsciously, this market haggling technique to defend their religion. It works most of the time which is to say enough times to be profitable.
It is not at all certain that we will be able to stop its spread because, first and foremost, there are strong indications of payments being made to the right people to gain market access, and second of all the group that is most able and motivated to organize and see off the civilizational threat that is Islam, I speak of the Christians, are still dealing with the unexploded ordinance of the rending of Christendom. A war, I might add, that was encouraged for commerce’s sake not religion’s.
Well done brother. I wish to see you in a debate with a Muslim but it won't be a thing for the religion of peace.
It's even shows how Magamad wanted to be "their guy", share stories so people would get excitement and listen to him, so his religion was based like that - he sits and tells the religious stories, all of them, anything he had ever heard, as his own "revelations". What a disgusting cult, it's so easy to dealt with, just leave islam guys, it is unbelieveable, what's to hold onto here?
You're not religious people, you just use islam to culturaly stand out, you care not about nor God, nor nothing. When christians, papa is back in the house to settle thigs right you must listen or peris. Yet they sit here and bickering with no point, wanna be like us, scholars of our religeon, be faithul, and instead just look like some ugly sort of fanatics.
Leave islam, guys, LEAVE islam. After what i saw here, after all i saw i would leave islam within 3 seconds without a doubt (i wouldn't even be in it, really, some people are not too). Abragham was a first muslim and there were no other muslims beside him and Sarrah (how about Hagar? if Abragham was not yet in testament, why Sarrah upon marriage counted as muslim?). Then who was Noah? Then who was Adam?))) And why of all 99 names, two of Magamad's names are "first" and "last"? Is he god? Okay, if he ain't "first" being in universe, then who 1-st he is?
Right, FIRST MUSLIM, then no Abragham, no Noah, no Adam was muslims, Magamad only was one and he invented all of that... and he ain't needed much, he just stole stories. And muslim know this, why is Magamad that much praised? Because he brought islaaaaam... but who were Abragham then? There you go. Myth busted!
"It's even shows how Magamad wanted to be "their guy", share stories so people would get excitement and listen to him" This is played out in places like Surah 2:78-79. Apparently Muhammad would recite to new audiences oral traditions that he thought were faithfully preserved, and that they would accept. Swift disappointment would follow, however, when the Jews didn't even recognize then and called him a mad poet. The traditions had evolved well outside of the bounds set by Jewish tradition.
@@IslamCritiqued Why it is so funny overall?))) What a miserable LOSER after all, satan found his perfect guy (it's no difficult, plenty of people like Magamad) who wanted power and was so wicked... or is he became wicked?
I heard many times from CP that Magamad is NOT his real name even, Magamad is like title, means - "praised one", already a hideous blasphemy and breaking of second commandement.
God bless you, brother, LOVE you, thanks for the response.
Brother I m watching from India I request you to speak little slowly please
God bless you
On the "settings" wheel to the bottom right of the video you can slow it down. Hope that helps!
What's that box under your window?
Muslims..try reading this. Then you'll know were the mad poet Muhammad got his theology that Jesus didn't die on the cross. Are you proud of his and Allah's ability to plagiarize a 2nd century AD gnostic text called the Second Treatise of the Great Seth. Did Allah and Mo have any original thoughts? Can you defend their plagiarism? Read the text: "For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And the plan which they devised about me to release their Error and their senselessness - I did not succumb to them as they had planned. But I was not afflicted at all. Those who were there punished me. And I did not die in reality but in appearance, lest I be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I according to their sight and thought, in order that they may never find any word to speak about them. For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon Whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the archons and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance"
Could u please the written lines for 2-3 seconds or u can read them aloud.Tx
I like to keep the videos moving, so I post all of the text in a pinned comment so that people can look into them more. I see I forgot to do that on this video, I'll fix that. Thanks!
Hehe _abu Hurayrah_ means "Father of Kitty". There was a Syrian rebel fighter from Florida whose nom de guerre was _abu Hurayrah al-'Amriki,_ abu Hurayrah the American, so named because he often had a cat with him in photos
"Muslim Community Patrol in Brooklyn, New York" posted on The Amazing Lucas TH-cam channel. This is truly bad news! 😢
The Democrats never seen an enslavement program, that they could not defiantly defend.
That word you keep using, " *PRE-ISLAMIC* ". What can it mean? :) I'm still looking for the Abrahamic shahada :)
Oh that's right, there is no "pre-Islamic" period in Islamic theology. Oops!
@They don't like it up em I don't think this is a real quote. The only places it appears on the entire internet are your youtube comments and this website: setfreeseminars.com/2017/10/17/how-samaritanism-infiltrated-islam/ which suggests Islam stole from Samaritanism. I tried all kinds of searches without quotes in case the quotation was slightly wrong and found nothing. If this was real information, it seem highly unlikely that no one else would know about it.
@They don't like it up em I'm not opposed to the idea of the Quran stealing the formula from somewhere, although I think Mohammad adding his name on to a classic declaration about God ("There is no God but one") is more plausible. I do have Shadow of the Sword so I'll see if I can find it. Thanks for the book recommendation; I'll check it out.
God bless you brother.
thanks for your comment!
*BIBLE PROVES JESUS WAS A MUSLIM.*
*LANGUAGE*
Hebrew, Aramaic & Arabic share the same "root" language which is known as "common semetic"/ "dialect".
Moses spoke; Hebrew
Jesus spoke; Aramaic
Muhammad spoke; Arabic
The name for "God" is the same;
MOSES*- Hebrew- ELAH / ELOAH
JESUS*- Aramaic- ALAH / ALAHA
MUHAMMAD*- Arabic- ALLAH
Abrahamic Greeting "Peace Be Upon You"
MOSES- Hebrew- Shālôm ʻAlêḵem
JESUS- Aramaic- Shlama Alekhun
MUHAMMAD- Arabic- Salam Alekum
In Hebrew, Jesus is; YESHUA
In Aramaic, Jesus is; EASHUA
in Arabic, Jesus is; EESA
The letter "J" is NOT in the Hebrew alphabet.
The Romans Latinized the His name from "EASHUA" to JESUS to convert Him into a Roman.
Then, they added "CHRIST" from the Greek language which means "MESSIAH".
What language do you speak???
*LAWS;* Don't eat pork.
Leviticus 11:7
And the pig, though it has a divided hoof, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you.
Leviticus 11:24
“‘You will make yourselves unclean by these; whoever touches their carcasses will be unclean till evening. Whoever picks up one of their carcasses must wash their clothes, and they will be unclean till evening.
Leviticus 11:43
"Do not defile yourselves by any of these creatures. Do not make yourselves unclean by means of them or be made unclean by them. I am the Lord your God; consecrate yourselves and be holy, because I am holy. Do not make yourselves unclean by any creature that moves along the ground. I am the Lord, who brought you up out of Egypt to be your God; therefore be holy, because I am holy."
Mathew 5:17-19
JESUS said;
*"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.*
*For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.*
*Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.*
*Bible says if you eat pork or follow anyone who eats pork, you go to HELL!!!*
Isaiah 66:17
"Those who consecrate and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one who is among those who eat the flesh of PIGS, rats and other unclean things--they will meet their end together with the one they follow," declares the LORD.
Do you eat pork???
*CIRCUMCISION*
Luke 2:21
On the eighth day, when it was time to circumcise the child, he was named JESUS, the name the angel had given him before he was conceived.
Are you circumcised???
*FASTING*
Matthew 4:2
After fasting forty days and forty nights, He (JESUS) was hungry.
Matthew 6:16
JESUS said;
"When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show others they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.
Do you fast???
*PRAYER*
THE JEWS HAVE A FORM OF WORSHIP.
Matthew 26:39 “He (JESUS) went a little farther and fell on His face, and prayed to God (ALLAH).
Genesis 17:3 “Then ABRAHAM fell on his face, and prayed to God (ALLAH) (talked with him.")
Numbers 20:6 “So MOSES and AARON went from the presence of the assembly to the door of the tabernacle of meeting, and they fell on their faces and prayed to God (ALLAH).
Joshua 5:14
Then JOSHUA fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and prayed to God (ALLAH)
Do you pray the same???
JESUS CONFIRMS HE IS A MUSLIM IN ORIGINAL ARAMAIC GOSPEL;
Luke 6:40 - In ARAMAIC
JESUS said;
"Ein talmeed na'leh 'al rabbo; shekken kal adam she'MUSHLAM yihyeh k'rabbo."
Translation in English: "No student can be above his teacher, but everyone that is a MUSLIM, can be as his teacher."
IF JESUS CAME TO THE JEWS, THEY WOULD REJECT HIM.
IF JESUS CAME TO THE MUSLIMS WE WOULD ACCEPT HIM BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM.
MUSLIMS SPEAK THE CLOSEST DIALECT TO JESUS.
MUSLIMS FOLLOW THE LAWS JESUS FOLLOWED.
MUSLIMS PRAY EXACTLY LIKE JESUS.
MUSLIMS BELIEVE JESUS IS THE MESSIAH.
IF JESUS WENT TO THE CHRISTIANS, HE WOULDN'T FEEL COMFORTABLE. HE DOSNT SPEAK ENGLISH, HE DOSNT EAT PORK AND HIS FORM OF WORSHIP IS DIFFERENT. AND IF THATS NOT ENOUGH, THEY DONT EVEN KNOW HIS NAME. THE CHRISTIANS WOULD HAVE TO TEACH JESUS ENGLISH AND CHRISTIAN FORM OF WORSHIP.
THEN THE CHRISTIANS WOULD FORCE FEED JESUS PORK.
WHY WOULD JESUS WANT TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THAT?
@@realitycheck3672 This isn't how language works. Also, where do I find this "original aramaic" gospel that you have access to but professional scholars have never heard of?
Reasoned Answers
Do you even know Hebrew?
*JEWS IN ISRAEL EXPLAIN WHY ALLAH IS THE TRUE GOD OF ISRAEL.*
m.th-cam.com/video/arZZ8Gidgw0/w-d-xo.html
Reasoned Answers
Call a church in Syria, where Aramaic is spoken and ask the Syrian Christians to send you a copy of the Gospels written in Aramaic.
Muhammad might have plagiarized Bible stories from his first wife's cousin - Waraqah ibn Nawfal who was a Christian priest who translated the New Testament from Greek according to hadiths. The hadiths say that he died before Muhammad's career as a Prophet really got started but that he accepted him as a true messenger of God. Other hadiths say Muhammad had seen the Torah on several occasion.
I'm more along the lines of a later date. So when I say "Muhammad", I'm referring to a historical construct that occurred over a couple hundred years after the historical Muhammad most probably lived. Thoughts?
@@IslamCritiqued
You may be right. It's not clear what is factual or mythological when it comes to Muhammad's life. The historian Tom Holland questioned Islam started in Mecca or that Muhammad was even born there in his documentary on the subject, as did scholars like Patricia Crone. More info here:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam:_The_Untold_Story
@@IslamCritiqued There were multiple "Mohammads". And there are hadiths in the Sunnah where a "Mohammad" was directly quoting Bible verses from Job, Psalm and Isaiah. The hadiths all say that he was begging God for forgiveness by washing him with snow (Job, Psalm) and casting his sin as far as the east is from the west (Psalm) and that he was filthy with sin (Isaiah).
When I was browsing through the Sunnah, I came across one of the hadiths that said "wash me with snow, and cold water and hail and I shall be clean as a white garment is washed of filth" and my eyebrows went up in confusion because I recognized that from the Bible. He was quoting directly. I said to myself "man, he is preaching from the Bible", because one of the hadiths say he was praying for a dead man. And get this, in that prayer he was asking God to absolve the man's sins and give him peace using the word absolution as a Christian priest would when saying Last Rites.
He was saying the fourth line of the Last Rites, "BY THIS SIGN THOU ART ANOINTED WITH THE GRACE OF THE ATONEMENT OF JESUS CHRIST AND THOU ART ABSOLVED OF ALL PAST ERROR AND FREED TO TAKE YOUR PLACE IN THE WORLD HE HAS PREPARED FOR US."
Whichever one of those men spoke, at least one Mohammad was a Catholic priest.
@@moorek1967 Christian priest*
Well presented and critically analyzed. What about the claim in the Quran that Allah told Abraham to use Ishmael for the sacrifice (false)! As this contradicts the original source in the Bible & Torah which God demanded for the sacrifice of Isaac! "... Ask the people of the book!.. Remember???
Muslim interpreters have been divided over Ishmael/Isaac. Today, most Muslims believe it was Ishmael. So yes, a good challenge for the latter for sure!
Blessed
Thanks, 😊
I wanted to ask you, why Muslims state that Abraham took Ishmael and Hagar to Mecca in order to extablish the Kabba? 🤔
Yesterday I was watching a video of a debate between Dr. Wood and a Muslim apologist where the Muslim stated that Abraham travel to Mecca.
Just more examples of Muslims making history suit their agenda.
Very interesting
LOVE your videos. But you S's are SO LOUD! Almost every S sound that comes out sounds like a loud sharp wissile.
They've been de-ess'ed for the last several videos. Sorry, I've done all I can do with my current audio setup.
@@IslamCritiqued well thanks for trying LOL! sorry if I seemed overly picky. I'll live.
Yeah, maybe just try listening on another device. I've realized it myself, but rarely get comments about it. Yours is the second. I would like to change my audio setup at some point.
@@IslamCritiqued I'm using my phone with earphones. Just so you know.
Ohh...yeah. Probably drop the earphones and that will do the trick.
Don't Muslims look at the Jews stating Ezra was the son of God 9:30, and Christians stating Jesus is the son of God therefore in their logic or manufactured view they called Jews and Christians Polythiest (pagan)
Islam.still.does it...oh wait..your final words...well we.agree.totally..
Hinduism is also a big problem in india
John 14:6!
Why is it a problem??
@@jinkageonishin1180 bcos of caste based oppression in india that exists in hinduism
@@prashant1718 are you from India? Isn't a caste a political system?
@@jinkageonishin1180 yes its a part of politics in india thats why here too much corruption exists and no balanced development .
Thanks once again for highlighting the vast difference between Holy Scripture like the Quran and man-made sayings=hadith.
I have no doubt that Abu Huraira was a pious person. But for a person such as him to have spent only 4 years in the Company of Prophet Muhammed and for him to go on to write approx 5400 hadith seems quite perplexing. He, Abu-Huraira got this name because he was known as "The Father of Cats." He was a cat lover. Hence the reason amongst his hadiths are his hatred for dogs. Hence, according to him dogs are not clean, its unlawful for a Muslim to keep a dog etc etc.
As for stories of the past, we are bound to find similarities and also differences.
However, no such contradictions are in the Quran. The Quran came to re-affirm previous scriptures, it came to correct biases and errors that had crept into Christianity and Judaism.
The Quran states that Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian but a true believer in Monotheism, a true Muslim.
Thanks for your input.
I am sure, if the quran came to correct errors in the Torah and the Evangelion, you can certainly explain to me why Muhammad said Mary, the mother of Jesus, was the sister of Moses and Aaron.
Of course Moses and Aaron had a sister, her name was Miriam (Mariam) but that is not Mary. These 3 figures lived approximately 1300-1500 years before Jesus.
What do you mean by correct errors? Sounds more like producing errors......
@@jonson856
Hi. The verse you are referring to from the Quran is at 19:28 I believe.
The fact is that the Aaron( Harun) being discussed here, is another pious man who lived at the time of Mary. It is not referring to Aaron, brother of Moses.
Mohsin Khan in his translation of the Quran, points to this!
In addition, in Islam there is such a thing as being ones sister or brother despite not sharing the same parents. Its by lineage.
Its just like the Bible which not only says that Jesus was the Son of God, but in fact there are Sons of God, by the dozen, in the Bible. So do Christians call all of them Jesus brothers???
We are all the children of God, in a metaphorical sense.
Thanks for helping to clarify this point.
" Without knowledge, anyone can make a fool out of anyone else. By Knowledge, we can ALL learn." Famous saying by Khal A.D2019
"...difference between Holy Scripture like the Quran and man-made sayings=hadith." it's the same with the Quran. The only reason you don't see this is your predisposition not to: th-cam.com/video/7cuTkCGbVlE/w-d-xo.html; th-cam.com/video/cxheJas1hGM/w-d-xo.html
@@sayedf11
Thanks for reinforcement. jzk
@@sayedf11
Brother, I have recently seen a rapid increase in the number of videos trying to bash Islam/Quran. Because Islam is increasing, there is a movement to curb it. Suppose this has been so, since beginning. Another idiot calls himself Apostate Prophet, he is doing the same. Sadly, they can influence only the ignorant of religion, but there are many in this category.
We will use Quranic injunction to:
Invite to the Way of your Lord with beautiful preaching.
jzk brother.
go to the source 42:13
and re read Petra Jordan
most probably
everything started there
even your histories
peace
th-cam.com/video/ChIEV5Ny734/w-d-xo.html
islamic exegesis - i mean - islamic exe jesus.
So, Muslims think prophets are "infallible?"
Let's me count the rebuttals:
1. Moses refused to listen to God's word of speaking to the rock, and instead, the prophet struck the rock. (There's a prophetic implication, but I don't think the Muslims understand.)
2. Isaiah said that our righteousness is "as of filthy rags." (Isaiah 64:6. It gets even worse if you read the verse in the original Hebrew. Just a fair warning, the Hebrew version is very graphic.)
3. The same Isaiah, in Chapter 6:5, says that he has "unclean lips" when seeing the Lord of Hosts.
4. Jonah ran away instead of preaching to Ninevah.
5. In Stephen's testimony before the Sanhedrin, Abraham didn't listen to God when the Lord told him to move to the county Jehovah wanted. Instead, Abraham (sorry that I'm not using Abhram) went up river.
Need I post more.
Nice list. I hadn't considered that angle before, although you'd have to do it form the Islamic versions of the stories for it to work for a Muslim. Otherwise, they'll just claim the imperfections of the prohpets are due to "corruption" in the Bible.
Hello, Sarah wasn't Abraham's sister or half-sister. He lied to save his own life. Abraham's father, Teran, had three sons Abram, Nahor and Harán. Teran was 205 years old when he died. This is from the Torah Bere'shit 11.
His life had already been spared by the time you get to Gen 20.12.
To my knowledge, the text you cited does NOT say that his father did not have a daughter. However, "Therefore a man will abandon." It was taught: a convert that converted and was married to his sister, whether from the mother or the father - it is acceptable, according to Rabbi Meir. The Sages say: from the mother it is acceptable, from the father, it must be established that he does not worship idols. A refutation arose: does it not say: "And moreover, she is my sister, the daughter of my father..." (Genesis 20:12)!" -Bereishit Rabbah
@@IslamCritiqued In the biblical genealogies we are told when the patriarchs had daughters and the Lord prohibited incest in Leviticus so the Lord doesn't contradict his word. The Jewish Study Bible states that the only incestuous relationship in Abraham's family was Nahor and Milcah, who were uncle and nice. If Sarah was Abraham's sister or half-sister it would have mentioned it in Genesis 11:29.
The Bible never approves of Abraham’s marriage. It simply records it. Don’t deny Genesis 20.12 because of apologetic concerns.
The Nazis did the same sort of things when it came to reworking history.
ahhh but Islam has been successful in many ways. How many times have you heard about the 18,000,000-20,000,000 million count Islamic slave trade?
@@IslamCritiqued Islam or the Ummayads or Ottomans?
@Islam Safari Yet the freeing of slaves is one of the best things a Muslim can do. Btw did you get permission from Islam critiqued to upload one of his videos?
Strange that Muslims would align with Hagar, an Egyptian slave woman, and Ishmael, a wild man (Genesis 16:12). The theological implications are mind-blowing. (I don't know if said Muslims align themselves with Esau, but that would be intriguing.)
😎
You contradicted yourself in 1:17 since you said they immigrated there in the first place. The Jewish Hebrews who immigrated there as a result of being brtually ethnically cleansed by the Romans in the Roman-Jevvish wars were ethnically Hebrews.
There is no such thing as "ethnically Arab" since "Arab" is not an ethnicity. The "Arab" identity that we know today is a result of Arabist-lsIamic conquests and propaganda. The same is true for the "Arabic" language which didn't really exist before lsIam.
The term "Arab" originally describe someone who is a nomad of the desert, similar to how the term "Bedouin" is understood, and doesn't denote an ethnic group whatsoever. Nowdays when people speak of "Arabs" what they really mean is "ArabISTS" = Pan-Arabists, which is tied to the ideology of Pan-Arabism.
As for the so-called "Arabic" language - it's actually mixture of other languages - Himyaritic, Aramaic and Hebrew, with a little bit of Greek, Persian, and Ethiopic. This mixture is what was eventually put into the "canonical" Quran and was spread with the Arabist-lsIamic conquests. This "Arabic" mixture language wasn't widely spoken prior to that (even inside the area that now inaccurately called the "Arabian Peninsula").
It's more accurate to use terms such as: Arabist, Bedouin, Hijazi than "Arab".
A Morrocan Arabist for example is almost certainly ethnically Berber/Imazigh and not a Hijazi Bedouin. Arabist-lsIamic propaganda seeks to erase any ethnic trace of the places it conquers and replace it with "Arab".
"You contradicted yourself in 1:17 since you said they immigrated there in the first place." Jewish communities existed in Arabia by the end of the 1st century CE. They, as well as Christians, continued to emigrate over the following centuries. This is the clear meaning of what I said. If it wasn't clear then, it should be now.
While "Arab" is not a gentilic term, as I have noted elsewhere, for the purposes of this video I've adopting Firestone's usage of the term. This usage is convenient, as it is how "Arab" is commonly understood.
I'm not sure what your point is about Arabic. Every known language has sister languages, cognates...etc.
If they immigrated there and married among themselves they weren't Hijazi Bedouins (what you inaccruately called "ethnically Arab").
How "Arab" is commonly understood (simplistically adopting the Arabist-lsIamic narrative) is wrong, and thats what I explained in my comment.
I don't know what you mean by "sister language" but if you mean a similarity between languages then it's completely different than the case of Arabic which is a creation out of a mixture of other languages rather than an independant language that happens to share similarity due to a pre-historic common origin. "Arabic" didn't exist before lsIam, and should actually be called Quranic or Quranic Hijazi Bedouin mixture rather than "Arabic".
By the way, in regards to the Arabist-Ishmaelite propaganda:
The notion that Hijazi Bedouins (or worse yet - a bigger group of Peninsula Bedouins) descend from Ishmael is an lsIamic invention. MusIims hijacked this notion in order to legitimize their conquests, rule and religious doctrine. In pre-lsIamic times such a notion did not exist.
In fact, even in the lsIamic sources themselves we can find clues on how early MusIims tried to cover up pre-lsIamic heritage:
The Prophet said on the authority of Ubayy bin Ka'b: "If anyone proudly asserts his descent in the manner of the pre-lsIamic people, tell him to bite his father's penis, and do not use a euphemism." [Hadith - Mishkat Al-Masabih, Vol. 2, p. 1021]
The Bedouin tribes of the Peninsula had lived in the area long before the supposed time Ishmael even existed. It's interesting to note in the lsIamic sources for passages such this:
Umar Ibn al-Khattab said of the Bedouin, "They are the origin of the Arabs…". [Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 5, Book 57, Number 50]
The truth is that if Ishmael even existed, or was based on a real person, he was a Hebrew man for all intents and purposes. Aside from his Hebrew name and heritage, we know that historically centuries before Muhammad was born Jevvs were named Ishmael (such as Ishamel ben Ntanya, Rabi Ishmael ben Elisha and others). There are also even older records for Jevvs using the name Ishmael, such as a tablet found at the site of Tel Halif in Syria, dated to the 7th century BCE. Ishmael was part of the Hebrew Jevvish heritage centuries before Arabist Muslims stole it and hijacked the name and his heritage for themselves, to serve their Arabist-lsIamic agenda.
"The notion that Hijazi Bedouins (or worse yet - a bigger group of Peninsula Bedouins) descend from Ishmael is an lsIamic invention. MusIims hijacked this notion in order to legitimize their conquests, rule and religious doctrine. In pre-lsIamic times such a notion did not exist." I specifically said this in the video.
We do find stories of a couple different "Ishmael's" in the Islamic texts. Regarding the primary sources, there is little to say. The Quran mentions him mostly as a secondary figure. A plausible reason for this would be the that Islam had relatively few sources to draw from. And the main sources with Ishmael traidition (Jewish) were decidedly negative.
@@humansdosuck I think after the Jews (and heretical Christians) were driven out of Israel, tehy even settled as far as Yemen. I read something somwhere but forgot the source. And those Jews and Christians were later massacred by the "arabs".
@@humansdosuck _"Arabic" didn't exist before lsIam, and should actually be called Quranic or Quranic Hijazi Bedouin mixture rather than "Arabic"._ This is certainly false. The Quran has influenced the grammar and thus is a factor in how Arabic has changed. (Arabic is not unique like this - all languages change over time.) But, Arabic certainly already existed. We have Arabic texts that predate the Quran, for example.
The Qur'an doesn't quote stories of prophets to narrate history, the main purpose is to deliver a lesson a message. But that doesn't mean that I think their not correct
Muslims do not believe that prophets are sinless. We believe they do have some sins but their Def better than ordinary people. If they weren't then why would God select them to be a prophet
Does the Quran contain history? And do you agree that the narrations cited in this video are contrived?
"Muslims do not believe that prophets are sinless." Many Muslims do, many of them here on my channel.
Very good. This can be applied to the bible also
Thank you brother, I was a Muslim for a long time and after watching your videos I am still a Muslim.
😂
Subhanallah🎃
This is not surprising because lying and deceit are core Qur'anic values.
Is it right for people to say that Jesus is G-D?
Yes.
moorek1967 now if Jesus is G-D who created Jesus?
@@Jkey94 _now if Jesus is G-D who created Jesus?_ No one. Jesus is uncreated (eternally existent).
@@sayedf11 _"created by John ...as it contradict the beginning in GEN
"_ Um no, John never says Jesus was created. He says the exact opposite. Where do you get this nonsense from?
Reasoned Answers ok, how would Jesus (P.B.U.H.N) be here if Mary did not birth him?
R u christian or atheist?
See "about section" for a brief bio.
Allah is the one and only god from the beginning of time,he taught humans everything even religion,Allah Almighty started the first religion from the beginning he sent a messenger to every nation (this is explicitly mentioned in Quran) to preach his divine revelations whether it was written or orally transmitted teachings it does not matter now since these are all lost,corrupted or exist as Folklores,myths,legends,Ancient religions and fairy tales however all of these holds a truth in them,Quran is the only divine revelation that is not corrupt, it's completely perfect.. hate it or love it, it's the truth and Islam haters are just jealous, As for the similarity it's normal they're from one god who is Allah,I like to hear and read about these specially when it resembles stories from Quran it strengthen my faith,it won't make me doubt my faith at all,if any Muslims doubted Islam because of it then he has no one to blame but himself for lack of knowledge probably this Muslim doesn't even read Quran, you Christians hate it when people say "Jesus is a copy from Dionysus" or Krishna and "virgin Mary is a copy from Maya the mother of Buddha" because your bible did not give you no hint to refute it with. Atheists say all religions are stolen from old legends and Folklores .... as a Muslim who studied and learned my religion enough all thanks to Allah, i say nobody plagiarized or copied from anyone these are all possibly stories of real prophets,angels and prophecies from Allah's divine revelation that has been corrupted through times maybe even long time ago since the beginning of humanity and the truth got mix with falsehood and packing it up with the fact that there are prophets Allah did not tell us about in Quran from 40:78 and 14:9 where Allah said that there is nations only he knows and also with 2:213 and 10:19 where Allah said humans were on one faith but they differed....So it's very normal for a truth to be transmitted between people through time in many ways,if you have a brain inside that head of yours instead of a rock you will realize that there is no way that all of these ancient religions and legends are similar to each other and to the Abrahamic religions from simply.. nothing.
Few examples
-Man created from clay is in the bible and Quran but also in Chinese,Greek ,Egyptian mythology
-Leviathan is in the bible similar to jörmungandr in the Norse mythology and so many others.
-Stories like the epic of Gilgamesh or epic of Atrahasis they say it's older than Noah's flood..which is in the bible and Quran.
it's fine for me, it could be an old prophecy revealed by Allah of prophet Noah himself... heard during that time and was corrupted, Adam was the first prophet but Noah was the first messenger in Islam.
lastly, this comment will refute everything from this videos of yours and everything you said to "islam stolen from paganism" to "Allah is moon god" and everything like these stupid infidels ideas, don't let us repeat that ISLAM EXIST FROM THE START OK it doesn't matter if it was called islam or something else,pre-islamic Arab heard of a god name Allah before but mixed this truth with so many ridiculous things like giving him daughters or making him a moon god...etc.
know that every command Allah gave to Muslims in the Quran is already in the bible even though it's corrupt, what do you all have against us?Nothing, you are just wrongdoers. this is enough for me to know truly no god but one god Allah the all-wise and all- knowing any other god are a nobody.
“this comment will refute everything from this videos of yours and everything you said to "islam stolen from paganism" to "Allah is moon god” Your comment proves you didn’t even watch the video. Watch the video before responding.
@@IslamCritiqued No honestly i did not watch all of it,it's obvious what you trying to proves from only the title,the comment still refute your video and also your Muhammad and Merkabah Mysticism video,but i can see that you have no reply, i hope you understood now and stop making such a videos.
“No honestly i did not watch all of it” I know you didn’t, which is why I won’t respond.
@@IslamCritiqued Great for both of us, disputing and arguing with the fools and ignorant is not something likable in Islam anyway.
وانهم لفي ضلالهم يعمهون
To the respected viewers, what Islam critiques is trying to deceive you that Islam has no connection with Ibrahim and Jews and Christians, I request you to read the quraan yourself don't accept what critiques of Islam present short ill views, go to source and find complete information. You will find the God who talked to prophet Ibrahim, Moses, Jesus and other prophets is talking to prophet Mohammad as well. I am happy that these people giving chance people to study quraan and find the truth themselves.
These people pick the verse of quraan saying quraan orders to punish a person severely, I am asking did quraan say catch a passerby and punish severely? Quraan gives a solution how to protect the society.
Please don't be deceived by sweet voices think for your sake. Islam is the truth and will enter every single door that's not my word but the word of owner of this universe and He is only one.
If anyone wants guidance turn to only one creator ask guidance from, He will not let you fall into satanic trap.
which specific sources or citation in this video do you disagree with?
I would also ask you to cite specifically what you disagree with in this video. This video clearly demonstrates how Muslims would add to existing traditions to create their own history.
Elsewhere, I've focused on some specific verses in the Quran as well as narrations in the hadith and shown that they do not come from God or a prophet of God: th-cam.com/play/PLVwt18wNX1gyR4zQBIso2WFRecAojyJb4.html
@@IslamCritiqued do you promote Islam, you say you prove verses of the quraan not from God, do you convince about those verses, also the verses from God,( challenge still stands for fourteen centuries bring few verses like quraan, you are in a position to accept that) the hadith from Prophet and other sources. And your book that has been written by third and fourth hand without any record, in fact from stories is direct from God. Can you make out?
Again, if you have a specific argument with what I've presented, bring it. "And your book that has been written...." yeah yeah. Same old thing. Muslims can't defend their religion so they attack Christianity instead. Don't waste my time.
@@IslamCritiqued First thing you are quoting another Islamic critiques historian to support your points, quote Gibbon the best and well knowb historian. I am asking why did Christians fled the Romans persecution whenever Romans accepted Christianity? You must know that the true Christians were Unitarian and believe Jesus was only a prophet and they were persecuted and fled. But why did they go to a deserted place where life was hard and not to a fertile place?
Both Jews and Christians knew the dwelling place of last and final messenger. You together with your favourite historian are trying to prove that the legends of Arabs were inserted into quraan, that's stupidity, the Arabs were astonished of quraanic style and thought this is work of magician. It needs volume to explain everything. In short you are misleading people increasing devil's membership. My time is more precious than yours.
I love Allah & I believe only in Allah
If you work for it, the god of the quran may love you back. Though his love is thin, and can be lost. You may get to within a cubit of paradise before his decree takes over and he sends you to hell: sunnah.com/bukhari/82/1. Maybe he created you for hell from your father's loins: sunnah.com/muslim/46/47.
Also, Allah "loves" you so much that you'll get tortured in the grave after death, and then have to pass though the flames of hell after which point you'll retaliate on other Muslims for sins committed in this life. sunnah.com/bukhari/46/1; sunnah.com/bukhari/23/115
That's the forgiveness and love of allah...wow. Leave a lot to be desired. Also, why would you want to be a part of a religion that simply constructs its history, as I show in this video?
@Islam Safari How do you know Quran has mistakes.bcoz our Prophet Muhammad couldn't read or write so how he could copie other books. Muhammad just spoke to us what angle said to him from Allah. If you believe that Quran has mistakes then you are not a Muslim. One more thing our Creator Almighty Allah is not very far from us but we are not able to catch him & obey to him
@Islam Safari I think we have the same God /Allah 👍
@Islam Safari it's not for only our Muslim womens Muhammad said it for all women's he didn't add it to as religious differences that's why we Muslims Women's wear Hijab & not trying to act like more attractive to men. If all women's obey to Quran & wear Hijab then they will be in jannah insha Allah & Modelling, bikini is totally Haram .if any women from this industry then she will be in Jahannam / hell & no one can save her.
Now see Media is doing it everywhere like making Model , to provoke women's to wear bikini which is totally Haram in islam these kind of sins won't be forgiven. One more thing Luxurious lifestyle is totally Haram in Islam. bcoz when a men get everything in this life then he forget what is the purpose of life why Allah sent us to this beautiful world
Thanks for sharing.
You're very welcome!