When you mentioned that Ireland's original genetic stock was largely replaced, do we think there was conflict and killing to reduce theirs numbers, or overwhelming numbers arriving in and outreproducing the smaller original groups, or....?
I have a dream - one day people outside of Britain will learn how the UK was really created. It was born out of very successful resistances of the Britons and Scots. Both in Wales and Scotland! Let’s not forget that it was a Welsh Tudor that Chained England and Wales together and it was a Scotsman who chained Scotland with those two. England didn’t create The UK out of conquest, but Wales and Scotland made it out of their resistance.
@@WalesTheTrueBritons Not just people outside Britain. Most people inside Britain haven't cottoned on to this. It doesn't lessen the fact that the English upper classes suppressed Scottish and Welsh culture though.
@@WalesTheTrueBritons so the Welsh and Scots get the credit for keeping Great Britain diverse and they get the credit for unifying England, Wales and Scotland by having kings with Norman ancestry? Also... The true Britons lived in Yorkshire but they didn't move to Wales. They stayed put and merged with the true Anglo-Saxons from Mercia. 😝
I’m Scot’s/Irish on my father’s side and Anglo/ Welsh on my mother’s ,I joined a geology society and looked up my family tree and was amazed at how intertwined our four home nations are, but it blows my mind to think if you go back a 1000 years theoretically you’ve got 1 billion ancestors, when the population of Europe was only 56 million ! 🏴
@@andrewheaney6858 your not real scotts you just assumed the names during slavery to own our shit your caucasian slavic south African lol not a moor that would be a shame to even breed with a bigfoot or neanderthal...
@@stephfoxwell4620 I was reading that Robert the Bruce has allegedly over 200 million distant descendants, even if it’s half of that , that’s pretty insane !
The Britons (Welsh) are constantly being written out the history of these islands. When they were the main players for over 2000 years! Everything it seems gets turned into Irish, Viking, Roman or Anglo Saxon.
@@stephenjenkins2166 The Celts who re-settled what is now Brittany France. The Romans called Brittany "Lesser" (Little) Britain because they spoke the same dialect as the Welsh) The rest of France was speaking something more like a Gulish "P" - Brythonic dialect - even before the Romans arrived. After the Romans the language became proto-French.
"These islands" don't have a "history". The island on the left has a history of its own and the island on the right has a history of its own...sometimes those histories intersected, sometimes they didn't. E.g. Welsh (the Britons) are not relevant to Irish history.
@@Macca-rb5ok Oh Please !!! Those Celts in Britain and Ireland had been raiding , trading and marrying back and forth across the Irish sea, the English channel and along the Atlantic coast CENTURTIES BEFORE and after the arrival of the Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans to Albion/"Great(er)" /"Bigger" Britain ["Little"/"Smaller"/"Lesser" Britain being (modern) Brittany France. Britons (including Manx, Picts, Welsh, Cornish people) and Brentons (i.e. People of Brittany, France)spoke the "P" (i.e. "Brythonic") dialect of Gaelic (as did the Gauls/ (later the French) on the mainland. The Irish (and later the Scots after Saint Columbia settled Iona and the Scotti invaded Scotland; spoke the "Q" dialect of Gaelic; as did the Celts in northern (modern) Portugal/Spain (Scots Gaelic is the "Q" Gaelic of Scotland ... the Pictish language and the Picts are extinct) Saint Patrick was (supposedly ) a Romanized Welshman[1] He was originally from the western coast of Albion/Great Britain! 1.) Saint Patrick was kidnapped from the west coast of Albion/Great Britain and sold into slavery to a ruler of an Irish chiefdom. After a few years he escaped and made his way back to Britain and then to (where modern) Belgium (is) One of his uncles was the head of a monastery at that place. (There is no mention of what became of St. Patrick's parents/siblings) Anyhow, Patrick became a priest, went to Rome and received permission to go to Ireland to evangelize. Patrick wasn't the first to evangelize in Ireland Some missionaries had already been active near Cork and nearby; at a coastal port/village that was inhabited by Romanized Friesens (i.e. people from what is now the Netherlands) Christianity had caught on fast once it was no longer persecuted (i.e. after 314 CE) I do not know if the Romanized Friesens were engaged in fishing or in trade (both?) So, at least some Romans, or their colonized representatives, had been to Ireland. The Romans had certainly known about Ireland/"Hibernia" is what they called it. The Roman empire was based more on trade than on conquest and subjugation. Although, the Roman Legions were impressive.
@@Macca-rb5okSorry, but that's complete nonsense. Only modern nationalist try to rewrite history to suite their isolationist narratives. The isles histories are very intertwined as are the genetics of those who live on them.
Id say the romans did reach ireland. But they met the Fianna at "The Battle of Ventry". Its a great story look it up, and the timelines line up perfectly. It was very unusual for a country at that time to have a standing army but ireland did as they were in a period of unification and so were just about able to repel them.
The Romans never got to Ireland. No records exist! However there are records of the Britons taking over swathes of Ireland Pre and Post Roman. It’s argued that the Fort in Ireland that looks Roman is nothing but a replica created by the Britons who ruled in Ireland.m after them.
So what I was trying to say was I believe there is an oral story handed down saying they did, and im inclinedto believeit. Are you familiar with the story?
There is some evidence that Irish rulers travelled to Britain in an effort to gain Roman support in the clashes between the various Irish kingdoms. There is, so I am told, an Irish legend of a wizard named Clan Catalan who had 27 sons. It has been suggested by somebody far more knowledgeable than me that this may be a distorted oral account of drilled Roman Auxilia Palatina intervening in a civil war in Ireland. Then there's a reference to Lugaid Laga Mac Conn, the deposed king of Tara who fled to Britain in the late 2nd century. He was helped by the King of Britain and he regained the throne of Tara. He was killed by Cormac Mac Art in the 3rd century, who went on to raid Roman Britain.
The Welsh likely have the most unchanged Celtic DNA as they were descended from the ancient hunter-gatherers who migrated into Britain and were not largely affected by Germanic and Viking invasions. The Scots and Irish were folded into the Norse Gael society during the Viking age. And the English are the result of combined rules of the Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Normans, and French.
Except the Normans didn't leave any DNA behind, and the Danes only left 6% behind on average, maybe 10-12% in the Danelaw regions or when combined with English coastal DNA from Norway. The Scots and Irish are also overwhelmingly Celtic, but have more Anglo-Saxon DNA than they do Viking.
@ ianblake815 The ancient European hunter-gathers were pretty much replaced by farmers (originally from the Levant/Anatolia) Stonehenge and the rest of those Megaliths were built by these people. Celts were an Indo-European society that existed by the time of the Bronze Age and may have existed during the Chalcolithic (Copper Age) There are 3 theories of where the Celts originated and how early they were in western Europe. *Welsh are Celts, specifically Celts who speak* *the "P" ("Brythonic") dialect of Gaelic.* The people of Albion/Britain spoke the "P" dialect (Cornish people, Welsh, Picts, Manx and Britons) as did the people of (what is now, modern) France -- i.e. Gauls (Roman times) and the people of the Brittany region of France (who still speak "P" Galic and can be understood by Welsh-speakers) Irish speak the "Q" (pronounced like a "K") dialect of Gaelic as do the Scots. "Q" Gaelic originated in the Iberian peninsula (northern Spain/northern Portugal were the last places where "Q" Gaelic was spoken in the Iberian Peninsula. But at one time Celts lived throughout most of the peninsula (probably absorbed by other groups, just as they absorbed earlier groups. The Scots speak "Q" Gaelic because the land of Alba/Scotland was invaded by the Scotti tribe from northern Ireland. Also because of the Irish Christian church's influence by St. Columbia on Iona. The "P" speaking Picts were eventually pushed east, where they mixed with the Vikings who settled on the eastern coast of Scotland, the Orkney and Shetland Islands.
Kernow (Cornwall) has a unique Celtic genetic identity with Penwith (SW Cornwall) being a subset linked with the Basque people according to Craig Weatherhill in his book “The Promontory People”
They may have a unique genetic identity and spoke a Celtic language, but that doesn't make the inhabitants of that region Celtic - that is just a name given to the peoples of central Europe by the ancient Romans. Language and culture doesn't get passed down through genetics.
@@billythedog-309 Yep, I’m aware of that. I wasn’t suggesting the Cornish are uniquely Celtic, just that they have a unique identity within the nations we refer to as Celtic.
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not them your south african
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans
I have R1b and U5a1a1 from parents lines. I am basically North Western European 99.8%. Are we not all just Europeans who created tribal identities that became Nations which invaded each other and mixed the gene pool?
Astonishing how far early people travelled pre Roman. It was over many generations but still. Humans are such curious creatures, wishing to see what's over that hill. Seasonal foraging would encourage following the later ripening in different regions. Your big island has been trampled by many feet.
Agree, especially when you consider how quickly people could navigate on long or large rivers, eg the Danube, or the Nile, and very little pollution created back then , now you have to pay $30,000 to replace your car battery if you own a Tesla like my neighbour 😂
@angelareimann6433 It wasn't just pure curiosity driving them, however. Very ancient humans weren't a friendly bunch, and they killed everything they could get their hands on, including each other. They had to keep moving to stay alive long enough to find habitable places to live without any other resident humans.
Slightly off-topic: what I found fascinating when visiting Stonehenge four months ago was not necessarily Stonehenge itself, but the landscape surrounding. There are many burial mounds all around in the surrounding fields and they would have been built by people completely genetically different to the original builders yet they still venerated the site. For thousands of years of prehistory, across different cultures, the site was hugely significant - and that's just amazing.
From that Anglo Saxon origin study I believe they were saying that a late arriving group probably from France that had genetics exactly similar to Iron age French came after the Anglo-Saxons period and contributed to the genetics of England but not Ireland, Scotland or Wales. It is not Norman but Merovingian time period most likely
It's actually a second Celtic migration from before Anglo-Saxons, and even before Roman occupation. It affected all of Ireland and Scotland, but had no affect on Wales in particular. This is probably from a group of Gaul or Belgae-like British ancestors more similar to the Gauls the Romans knew, and less like "native" Britons who'd already been settled in the British Isles for quite some time. I also suspect, although this is pure speculation, that this is why the Gauls are often depicted quite similarly to the Irish, including clothing and red hair, whereas pockets of England and pretty much all of Wales have a more distinct look not typically associated with the way ancient Celts are depicted.
I’d love to see a video about them! And - the genetic connection to northwest costal England. I read that the dna is very closely related, both being WHG rooted?
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent your not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not a real race...
@@stephfoxwell4620 slavic caucasian DNA rh positive aka rhesus monkey is nilot south africa lol not black hebrew Scott like Campbell's and Douglas we have them here in Wolverhampton who everyone knows not you guys🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭
I have stage four non-small cell lung cancer and I’m going to die pretty soon so I hope you tell me my where exactly I came from. If you could read everything that I type I don’t know if they lied to me, but I trust you.
You come from wonderfully strong, fierce, determined and hardy people. God be with you, by your side. Guaranteed your ancestors will be waiting on the other side to tell all their secrets when you arrive ❤️
I think that there is a lot of deception about our origins, some are keen to make out that we are a nation of immigrants not native people aboriginal to these islands. I don't agree: Prehistoric and Genetic Foundations **1. Paleolithic and Mesolithic Periods:** - **Early Inhabitants:** The earliest known inhabitants of the British Isles were hunter-gatherers who arrived around 800,000 years ago. These populations were part of the broader human migrations out of Africa. **2. Neolithic Period:** - **Agricultural Revolution:** Around 4000 BCE, Neolithic farmers from the Near East and Anatolia migrated into Europe, bringing with them farming techniques. These groups intermixed with the indigenous hunter-gatherer populations, leading to the establishment of early farming communities in Britain. **3. Bronze Age:** - **Beaker Culture:** Around 2500 BCE, the Beaker people, known for their distinctive pottery, migrated into Britain. They brought new technologies, such as metalworking, and contributed to the genetic makeup of the population. - **Yamnaya Influence:** The Beaker people are believed to have origins connected to the Yamnaya culture from the Pontic-Caspian steppe (modern-day Ukraine and Russia). Genetic studies suggest a significant influx of Yamnaya DNA, particularly associated with the R1b Y-DNA haplogroup, which became prevalent in Western Europe, including Britain. ### Historical Migrations and Influences **1. Iron Age and Celtic Britain:** - **Celtic Tribes:** By the Iron Age, Celtic tribes known as Britons inhabited the region. They spoke Celtic languages and had a distinct culture that dominated the British Isles before the Roman invasion. **2. Roman Britain (43-410 CE):** - **Roman Conquest:** The Roman Empire invaded and occupied Britain, introducing Roman culture, infrastructure, and governance. The Roman influence lasted for nearly 400 years, leaving a lasting impact on British society, though the genetic impact was relatively minimal. **3. Anglo-Saxon Period (5th-11th Century):** - **Anglo-Saxon Migration:** After the Roman withdrawal, Anglo-Saxon tribes (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) from present-day Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands migrated to Britain. This migration had a profound cultural and linguistic impact, as Old English, a Germanic language, became dominant. - **Genetic Contribution:** The Anglo-Saxons contributed significantly to the genetic makeup of the English people. Studies suggest that modern English populations have a substantial proportion of their ancestry from these Germanic tribes. **4. Viking Invasions (8th-11th Century):** - **Norse Influence:** Viking invasions and settlements, particularly by Danes and Norwegians, further shaped the genetic and cultural landscape. Norsemen established the Danelaw in parts of England, influencing local customs, law, and language. **5. Norman Conquest (1066):** - **Norman Rule:** The Norman Conquest brought Norman-French culture and governance. While the Normans did not significantly alter the genetic landscape, their influence on the English language, law, and aristocratic structures was substantial. ### Genetic Studies and Haplogroups **1. Y-DNA Haplogroups:** - **R1b:** The most common Y-DNA haplogroup in Western Europe, including England, is R1b, associated with the Yamnaya and subsequent migrations, including the Beaker culture. - **I1 and I2:** These haplogroups are also present in significant numbers, particularly in regions with historical Viking settlement. **2. Autosomal DNA:** - **Mixed Heritage:** Genetic studies of autosomal DNA (inherited from both parents) reveal a mixed heritage, reflecting contributions from Paleolithic hunter-gatherers, Neolithic farmers, Indo-European steppe herders, and subsequent historical migrations. ### Cultural and Linguistic Development **1. Language Evolution:** - **Old English:** The language evolved from the Germanic dialects of the Anglo-Saxons, with influences from Old Norse due to Viking interactions. - **Middle English:** Post-Norman Conquest, English incorporated a significant number of Norman-French words, evolving into Middle English. - **Modern English:** The Renaissance and subsequent historical developments further enriched the English language, leading to the Modern English spoken today. **2. Cultural Synthesis:** - **Cultural Layers:** The culture of England is a synthesis of its diverse historical influences, from Celtic and Roman to Anglo-Saxon, Viking, and Norman elements. ### Conclusion The English people are the product of numerous waves of migration and cultural assimilation, starting from ancient hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers, through Indo-European migrations, and significant historical events such as the Roman occupation, Anglo-Saxon settlement, Viking invasions, and Norman Conquest. Genetic studies reveal a complex tapestry of ancestries, with significant contributions from various ancient and medieval populations.
You are correct in perceiving the attempt to divest ethnic Europeans from Europe (and not just in the UK, either) and pretend they do not constitute native indigeny there, nor have unique cultures or languages. It is purely a political attack by insecure, hateful, and bitter people whining about the past and who now wish to engage in mass revisionist history to benefit themselves. They claim this laughably as "social justice." It's just thinly veiled misdirected retaliation.
Cheddar Man is not the only human remains found in Gough's Cave in Cheddar Gorge. There were earlier human remains found in the cave, although it can be said that they had an interesting diet and interesting drinking vessels.
Typical First Nation Briton is 55% Ancient Briton , 30% Anglo-Saxon, 4-7% Norse or Norman, 2-3% Neanderthal, with bits of Italian, Eastern European ,Dutch and Hugeunot French.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz I have spent my 61 years studying our history. Yes. I spend every Armistice Day in Belgium visiting the graves of our forebears. I make no apology for the pride I have in my people.
Could I suggest the works of Sheila McGregor such as 'Archaic Gaelic: Decoding a Lost Language: 5 (Culture and Language)' She believes that English and Scots Gaelic speakers moved in from Doggerland during the ice age and examines names in the landscape as well as other things to support her work. I'm glad you give my haplogroup I2a2 a mention. We are still around.
Don't confuse the opinions of the loud political crowd with the average individual just working their way through life. Migration across the islands has happened ever since the first boats.
Mix of English and Scots.. through marriages I'm actually more Scottish DNA wise but both my English and Scottish ancestors married into the Norman families. My mother's J2 haplogroup Montgomery's that were once in the west of Scotland were originally Norman.
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people
my ancient dna is celtic , i done few dna tests , 23and me said my male line has ancient dna connection to that of neil of nine hostages , and also my true ancestry website also says that irish connection, and gives me large of uk celtic tribes , and pictish dna too small about 4.9 %and less viking and saxon than that of celtic
The Welsh have more white skin with dark hair and dark eyes ,like Zeta Jones. The rest of England has pretty much blue eyes.The Scotts have brown hair with blue eyes and the Irish blue eyes fair skin and light hair;though originall Irish had olive skin ,dark eyes and dark hair.What happened ? How did the Irish become lighter ?
I wish we had more information on what Norman genetics were and is it true France had some protestors block it or their own laws for some reason? Genealogical research has no downsides I can imagine so idk what phantom they’re chasing. I have extensive branches of family that is all Norman French and some Flemish names that were anglicized and even Scottish like Comyn was originally from Flanders even tho the descendants led to Scott’s like John Knox was in there. The line of Dunkeld Scottish kings eventually married into the Normans as well. I’d like to see a widespread genealogical analysis of Norman names and lines and see if any of it held up in any meaningful manner. My presumption is over time it blended into society almost entirely. But I wonder if there’s any still around with a majority Norman ancestry what a case study that would be. I find it fascinating how Vikings and Germanic people were integrationists taking on customs of places they came to dominate when usually you see people forcing their language or culture on others. Like arabization, Turkification, Anglicizing, the Hispanic world, Hanifying in China, etc. Norman’s seemed to do something unique. Even Hungarians were an outside group who genetically are closer to those around them than their linguistic counterparts but they still came to dominate as a culture others took in.
Me, watching and seeing all our family haplos 😅 My husband’s is R-Z18079 (downstream of R-M269.) On 23 and me it’s relatively rare: 1 in 4,000 men have it. So his mom’s most recent mito foremother was WHG and his most recent Y forefather was Bell beaker (yamnaya derived) As the archaeology shows, and in real life, the invaders loved those local ladies ❤
Then there’s me, with mito h6a1b2 which is Yamnayan. I like to think this foremother rode out with her husband or brothers to raid and win land, but who knows. She could have been the laundry wench or something worse 😅 I wonder how many women were actually known to ride out from the East with the guys? I’m sure a few did. It’s a fun idea! My dad is also downstream of R-m269 with R-Z253, which if our paper trail is correct, comes out of Western Germany. But, it’s also possible it was a NPE… he was a 35 year old newly arrived cabinet maker from Baden and married an 19 year old Irish maid via justice of the peace at an orphanage. Maybe she was already pregnant! 😅 If he was the dad (and I hope so, I took two years of German! lol) then maybe that original forefather was a bell beaker who stayed behind on the mainland? 😂 Thanks for another awesome video. It’s fun to plug in your own DNA data to the various studies coming out and effectively see where and when it could possibly link in the greater timeline of Ireland and the British Isles.
They were Gaelic speaking Norse Gaels or Gall Ghaeil and as such were perfect as royal bodyguards and heavy infantry. At the same time as they were culturally and linguistically compatible, they were removed from internecine tribal politics and were loyal unto death. Initially, they worked seasonally, returning to western Scotland for the winter. Eventually, many Gallowglass established themselves permanently in the clans they served. Over time and with intermarriage these Gallowglass became predominantly Irish Gaels, although their Scottish cousins continued to serve intermittently.
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
“Gal” “Glas” clue is in the name. They were Britons! Anyone with a decent amount of historical knowledge about the Britons and their language (Cymraeg) would recognise those words.
Lighter skin and Blue Eyes both due to less Melanin in the tissue. Did the two occur at the same time and are they linked? Is this linked to the Lactose Tolerance mutation? All three mutations occured at the same time?
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south african
Were not the Normans originally vikings anyway? ‘North-men’? Presumably the DNA of Normans would reflect their Scandinavian heritage. The whole skin colour thing you went into has been pretty much debunked as being total conjecture and not really worthy of mention in a serious discussion btw
The normans might be desended from norse people but they're not the same. They have been mixing with the franks (French) for generations. So their Scandinavian blood have been very diluted.
@@shailingkhongmalai9515 Also wasn't northern France once "Gaul"" so presumably R1b Celts - and the Franks were Germanic but also R1b ? (R1a ?) - Scandinavians either I1 or R1a or R1b - and that is just the men what of the women ?
You might look at the general ("ok twice, but that's a lot more than one would think"--meme) Viking attitude about saying 'well ok, this time we raid instead of trade', as being indicative of a general period of continued interaction, of which we get only the "interesting" highlights in the sagas. [Oh, and then there's "religion" to consider. Shhh. Unless you have a lot of time... et cetera.] Also, you may find the back-story on "Galgedil UO" an interestingly baffling example, at least from the genetic haplogroup perspective, versus the isotopic results, versus the overall timeline, all reasonably readable at PLOS. (ish, I barely followed it, and walked away with "more to see here, hopefully, in the future anyway" as my best takeaway). Oh yeah my point! That being that that might be why all these dano-frisians are hard to tell apart, genetically! Good call. :) [Me Y downstream from I-M284, so if not ex-IE WHG, then paralllel to them, it seems, at this time anyway.] Also keeping in mind that all these haplogroups were representative in multiple waves, so you'd need to get very specific, for any of them, if you are lucky. Cheers! [USA]
I have bell beaker phenotype rb1 l21 plus I have Norwegian and Finnish kven finn I love your videos and the science behind that plus you tell it like it is cheers and thank you
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south african
My HAPLOGROUP is R- DF13:: was for when it branched off from the ancestor RS552 and the rest of the mankind around 2600BCE this state is an estimate based on genetic information only with 95% probability the ancestor of RS55 was born between the year, 3235 and 2009 BCE. Y- DNA
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
On my paternal Grand-Fathers side I have Western Hunter Gatherer DNA and Neolithic DNA. On my Paternal Grand Mothers DNA I have Bell Beaker DNA, from my Mothers DNA I am almost 100% Bell Beaker. I think it's safe to say my family's been here for a little while 😂
You haven't mentioned that the 2022 paper describes a significant third component of the English gene pool besides the native Britons (England LIA) and immigrant Anglo-Saxons (England EMA CNE-like). A component that existed in Early Medieval times but that kept coming for longer than the CNE component (effectively watering it down). Maybe no one is interested in this because it's not as cool as having North Germanic (pirate/gangster) ancestry. Maybe the France IA component is too clean shaven. Maybe you just skipped it because you're not from England and it barely affects you. It seems pretty clear though. We have far more Gallic ancestry than Viking ancestry. And I suspect that has a lot to do with resistance. As a Mercian I would just like to thank the West Saxons for their support in crushing the Danelaw whilst the much more civilised France IA ancestors were welcomed with open arms.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace (Romanised softies 😂). The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits. Estimates from this study suggest that the English are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic"). I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it and made Modern English babies (diluting their own CNE ancestry). They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace. The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits. Estimates from this study suggest that the present-day English are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic"). I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it and made babies (diluting their own CNE ancestry). They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace. The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits who had no respect for the sabbath. Estimates from this study suggest that the present-day population are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic"). I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it. They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
I’m so sorry to correct you but according to BBC C4 the founders an earliest inhabitants of Britain an Ireland were sub Saharan Africans so please re check your research with the main broadcasters an knowledge Thankyou
The Norman’s where a mixture of Scandinavian, Breton and Frankish (Celtic Germanic) people so very similar to the existing Anglo - Brythonic mix already in England so measuring the genetic impact is impossible because genetically the same/very similar.
Also, Romans weren’t Italian, in the modern sense. They are more closely related to the Etruscans. Britons, Romans and Etruscans all claimed descent from Troy. With the Britons only ones being laughed at for it. And even when they have the most evidence.
@@gwyn2 I2 haplogroup is not E or A or B which are African - there is no evidence of African genetics - you conflate White people that tan for African ? or Asian ? or Middle Eastern ? is that to justify theft of property they did not build ?
I have blonde red hair I have blue eyes and my blood type is. O NEGATIVE RH NEGATIVE BLOOD TYPE ,, CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME MORE ABOUT MY DNA AND I LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS CHANNEL🌼✝️🙌🏻
Sounds like someone reading from a phone book as fast as possible in a thick Scottish accent. Teleprompters are a great help if used properly but this video makes my ears hurt.
"Sounds like someone reading from a phone book as fast as possible in a thick Scottish accent" Totally disagree - I'm English and understood every word, his accent is not 'thick' at all. His delivery was possibly a bit faster than a professional broadcaster, but I thought it was fine, he got the facts over - what more do you want?
@@celtichistorydecodedIt was an informative video but you were very fast,please in future videos could you slow down a bit to allow some of us to absorb and understand the information?😊
Google the history of the "Galatian" people (Gaul, Gaels - Celts) and their migrations - 600 BC++ And they are only one group among many splinter groups of "Israel." They're not the only ones but that is where you can find real historical proof of what has happened fairly quickly. "But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." - Matt. 15:24 "…and Ephraim is my firstborn." Jere. 31:9 … and the Celts (Galatians, Gaul, Gael, et al) were present in abundance in every location the Apostles, especially Paul visited and corresponded with - in Acts and every Epistle - on both sides of the Mediterranean all the way to Spain, France, Britain, Ireland, Scotland and... Northern Italy, Greece, etc. ....Them, the Phoenicians and the Romans. The Phoenicians and the Northern tribes of Israel had documented Biblical "Brotherhood Covenant." The Bible and other records say they were seafarers - traders - together. History, including Roman and Greek, record the rest.
And do you know why the word for Wales is in the Romance languages? Pays De Galles or a variation of that. Meaning the land of the Gauls. The clue is always in the languages! Keep a look out for the GAL!
@@WalesTheTrueBritons Look at Duet. 7:1 The land God told Israel to conquer and possess... the very first one is the "Hittites" - the Hittite Kingdom was in 'Anatolia,' modern day Turkey. That's the land of the "Galatians." They never took it but ended up there anyway!! lol
You would have thought they would have been happy to have dishwashing machines and cars and planes and plastic and just stayed where they were and no over populated - they were let in to steal property by teaming up with commercialists and landlords
Except they don't seem to have much visible diversity compared to European's they all look the same to me - but they make good renters and consumers and local anarchists to drive owner's to move and make more rentals for landlords
And Jesus Christ, Adam Eve Mary, Matthew Mark, Luke, John Peter Paul, Sarah, Samuel David Daniel, Jacob, Joseph John Elijah Elizabeth, Abraham, Enoch, Jesus Christ, who has God in the flesh Emmanuel is with us, Jehovah king king of Kings, Lord of the Lords, alpha and Omega please read about those wonderful people in the Bible✝️
Your talking a bit too fast..It's hard for my hearing to catch up with you..I do have very good hearing as well..Slow your talking down a bit..You would think you were in a hurry to get everything spoken quickly...
@@PatrickFitzgerald88 you dont tell me who I am I tell you nice try and we have maroon community in jamica and hebrew ones and were fully aware😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@nickjung7394 What would be a nice trade is bring back all the Dutch Africkan's and European British and send back everything else that was not voted on by the people of Britain to their genetic homelands - then they will stop complaining and be home at last with their people
@@alsteff6785 Yes South Africa and West Africa belongs to us Europeans and East Africa belongs to Arabs and North Africans. Now tell your people to get out of those lands.
Thanks for watching! Please let me know your thoughts below...
Genetic history..? It is irrelevant because you cucks stand by and watch your homeland be raped and pillaged. Why even bother asking this..?
When you mentioned that Ireland's original genetic stock was largely replaced, do we think there was conflict and killing to reduce theirs numbers, or overwhelming numbers arriving in and outreproducing the smaller original groups, or....?
I have a dream - one day people outside of Britain will learn how the UK was really created. It was born out of very successful resistances of the Britons and Scots. Both in Wales and Scotland! Let’s not forget that it was a Welsh Tudor that Chained England and Wales together and it was a Scotsman who chained Scotland with those two. England didn’t create The UK out of conquest, but Wales and Scotland made it out of their resistance.
@@WalesTheTrueBritons Not just people outside Britain. Most people inside Britain haven't cottoned on to this. It doesn't lessen the fact that the English upper classes suppressed Scottish and Welsh culture though.
@@WalesTheTrueBritons so the Welsh and Scots get the credit for keeping Great Britain diverse and they get the credit for unifying England, Wales and Scotland by having kings with Norman ancestry?
Also... The true Britons lived in Yorkshire but they didn't move to Wales. They stayed put and merged with the true Anglo-Saxons from Mercia. 😝
I’m Scot’s/Irish on my father’s side and Anglo/ Welsh on my mother’s ,I joined a geology society and looked up my family tree and was amazed at how intertwined our four home nations are, but it blows my mind to think if you go back a 1000 years theoretically you’ve got 1 billion ancestors, when the population of Europe was only 56 million ! 🏴
It's Scots-Irish and it's neither Scottish nor Irish
Congratulations, Yer a Redneck, a Hillbilly, and a Saxon
Your not a scott🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
Allowing for cousin marriage the British common ancestor point is around 1300.
For Europe it is 1050.
@@andrewheaney6858 your not real scotts you just assumed the names during slavery to own our shit your caucasian slavic south African lol not a moor that would be a shame to even breed with a bigfoot or neanderthal...
@@stephfoxwell4620 I was reading that Robert the Bruce has allegedly over 200 million distant descendants, even if it’s half of that , that’s pretty insane !
Your videos are consistently good. No waffle like much of TH-cam.
Thanks
The Britons (Welsh) are constantly being written out the history of these islands. When they were the main players for over 2000 years! Everything it seems gets turned into Irish, Viking, Roman or Anglo Saxon.
The forgotten Celts. Cymru am Byth. 🏴
@@stephenjenkins2166
The Celts who re-settled
what is now Brittany
France. The Romans
called Brittany "Lesser"
(Little) Britain because
they spoke the same
dialect as the Welsh)
The rest of France was
speaking something
more like a Gulish
"P" - Brythonic dialect -
even before the
Romans arrived. After
the Romans the language
became proto-French.
"These islands" don't have a "history". The island on the left has a history of its own and the island on the right has a history of its own...sometimes those histories intersected, sometimes they didn't. E.g. Welsh (the Britons) are not relevant to Irish history.
@@Macca-rb5ok
Oh Please !!!
Those Celts in Britain and Ireland had been
raiding , trading and marrying back and forth
across the Irish sea, the English channel and
along the Atlantic coast CENTURTIES BEFORE
and after the arrival of the Phoenicians, Greeks
and Romans to Albion/"Great(er)" /"Bigger" Britain
["Little"/"Smaller"/"Lesser" Britain being (modern)
Brittany France.
Britons (including Manx, Picts, Welsh, Cornish people) and Brentons (i.e. People of Brittany, France)spoke
the "P" (i.e. "Brythonic") dialect of Gaelic (as did the
Gauls/ (later the French) on the mainland.
The Irish (and later the Scots after Saint Columbia
settled Iona and the Scotti invaded Scotland;
spoke the "Q" dialect of Gaelic; as did the
Celts in northern (modern) Portugal/Spain
(Scots Gaelic is the "Q" Gaelic of Scotland ...
the Pictish language and the Picts are extinct)
Saint Patrick was (supposedly ) a Romanized
Welshman[1] He was originally from the western
coast of Albion/Great Britain!
1.) Saint Patrick was kidnapped from
the west coast of Albion/Great Britain
and sold into slavery to a ruler of an
Irish chiefdom. After a few years he
escaped and made his way back to
Britain and then to (where modern)
Belgium (is) One of his uncles was the
head of a monastery at that place.
(There is no mention of what became
of St. Patrick's parents/siblings)
Anyhow, Patrick became a priest, went
to Rome and received permission to go
to Ireland to evangelize.
Patrick wasn't the first to evangelize in Ireland
Some missionaries had already been active near
Cork and nearby; at a coastal port/village that was
inhabited by Romanized Friesens (i.e. people from
what is now the Netherlands) Christianity had
caught on fast once it was no longer persecuted
(i.e. after 314 CE)
I do not know if the Romanized Friesens were
engaged in fishing or in trade (both?) So, at least
some Romans, or their colonized representatives,
had been to Ireland. The Romans had certainly
known about Ireland/"Hibernia" is what they called it.
The Roman empire was based more on trade than
on conquest and subjugation. Although, the Roman
Legions were impressive.
@@Macca-rb5okSorry, but that's complete nonsense. Only modern nationalist try to rewrite history to suite their isolationist narratives.
The isles histories are very intertwined as are the genetics of those who live on them.
Id say the romans did reach ireland. But they met the Fianna at "The Battle of Ventry". Its a great story look it up, and the timelines line up perfectly. It was very unusual for a country at that time to have a standing army but ireland did as they were in a period of unification and so were just about able to repel them.
The Romans never got to Ireland. No records exist! However there are records of the Britons taking over swathes of Ireland Pre and Post Roman. It’s argued that the Fort in Ireland that looks Roman is nothing but a replica created by the Britons who ruled in Ireland.m after them.
So what I was trying to say was I believe there is an oral story handed down saying they did, and im inclinedto believeit. Are you familiar with the story?
There is some evidence that Irish rulers travelled to Britain in an effort to gain Roman support in the clashes between the various Irish kingdoms.
There is, so I am told, an Irish legend of a wizard named Clan Catalan who had 27 sons.
It has been suggested by somebody far more knowledgeable than me that this may be a distorted oral account of drilled Roman Auxilia Palatina intervening in a civil war in Ireland.
Then there's a reference to Lugaid Laga Mac Conn, the deposed king of Tara who fled to Britain in the late 2nd century.
He was helped by the King of Britain and he regained the throne of Tara.
He was killed by Cormac Mac Art in the 3rd century, who went on to raid Roman Britain.
The amount of interesting history that will never be told is insane
Good point. We can try though :)
The Welsh likely have the most unchanged Celtic DNA as they were descended from the ancient hunter-gatherers who migrated into Britain and were not largely affected by Germanic and Viking invasions. The Scots and Irish were folded into the Norse Gael society during the Viking age. And the English are the result of combined rules of the Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Normans, and French.
Your not a viking🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away your a nilot
@@alsteff6785 You know nothing about us Europeans?
@@alsteff6785 Why do most of your of your people carry Rh positive blood.
Except the Normans didn't leave any DNA behind, and the Danes only left 6% behind on average, maybe 10-12% in the Danelaw regions or when combined with English coastal DNA from Norway. The Scots and Irish are also overwhelmingly Celtic, but have more Anglo-Saxon DNA than they do Viking.
@ ianblake815
The ancient European hunter-gathers were pretty much replaced by farmers (originally
from the Levant/Anatolia) Stonehenge and
the rest of those Megaliths were built by these
people.
Celts were an Indo-European society that existed
by the time of the Bronze Age and may have existed during the Chalcolithic (Copper Age)
There are 3 theories of where the Celts originated and how early they were in western
Europe.
*Welsh are Celts, specifically Celts who speak* *the "P" ("Brythonic") dialect of Gaelic.*
The people of Albion/Britain spoke the "P" dialect
(Cornish people, Welsh, Picts, Manx and Britons)
as did the people of (what is now, modern) France -- i.e. Gauls (Roman times) and the people
of the Brittany region of France (who still speak "P" Galic and can be understood by
Welsh-speakers)
Irish speak the "Q" (pronounced like a "K") dialect
of Gaelic as do the Scots. "Q" Gaelic originated
in the Iberian peninsula (northern Spain/northern
Portugal were the last places where "Q" Gaelic
was spoken in the Iberian Peninsula. But at one
time Celts lived throughout most of the peninsula
(probably absorbed by other groups, just as they
absorbed earlier groups.
The Scots speak "Q" Gaelic because the land of
Alba/Scotland was invaded by the Scotti tribe
from northern Ireland. Also because of the Irish
Christian church's influence by St. Columbia on
Iona.
The "P" speaking Picts were eventually pushed east, where they mixed with the Vikings
who settled on the eastern coast of Scotland,
the Orkney and Shetland Islands.
Kernow (Cornwall) has a unique Celtic genetic identity with Penwith (SW Cornwall) being a subset linked with the Basque people according to Craig Weatherhill in his book “The Promontory People”
They may have a unique genetic identity and spoke a Celtic language, but that doesn't make the inhabitants of that region Celtic - that is just a name given to the peoples of central Europe by the ancient Romans. Language and culture doesn't get passed down through genetics.
@@billythedog-309 Yep, I’m aware of that. I wasn’t suggesting the Cornish are uniquely Celtic, just that they have a unique identity within the nations we refer to as Celtic.
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not them your south african
@@alsteff6785 your south african what?
Reply
Never forget Doggerland. RIP.
You never seen it you are slavic🤣🤣🤣
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
@@alsteff6785 so? dont get it
@@devilsolution9781 who cares bigfoot?
@@alsteff6785 Oh, you found your nans stash of meds, gotcha
This is superb, thank you very much 👍
Thanks
4/5 of my ancestry is British. I am grateful for your information. It helps me understand my ancient English & Scottish roots.
Your not a English 🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
@@alsteff6785 Slavery was invented by you Bantus.
@@alsteff6785 Your haplogroup is inferior to mine and you know it.
This is an extremely interesting video - a great summary of many preceding topics on human genetic legacies. Thanks.
Thanks
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans
@@alsteff6785 Seeth more pooface.
Thanks so much for such a detailed and informative video.
Thank you
I have R1b and U5a1a1 from parents lines. I am basically North Western European 99.8%. Are we not all just Europeans who created tribal identities that became Nations which invaded each other and mixed the gene pool?
Astonishing how far early people travelled pre Roman. It was over many generations but still. Humans are such curious creatures, wishing to see what's over that hill. Seasonal foraging would encourage following the later ripening in different regions. Your big island has been trampled by many feet.
Agree, especially when you consider how quickly people could navigate on long or large rivers, eg the Danube, or the Nile, and very little pollution created back then , now you have to pay $30,000 to replace your car battery if you own a Tesla like my neighbour 😂
@angelareimann6433 It wasn't just pure curiosity driving them, however. Very ancient humans weren't a friendly bunch, and they killed everything they could get their hands on, including each other. They had to keep moving to stay alive long enough to find habitable places to live without any other resident humans.
Slightly off-topic: what I found fascinating when visiting Stonehenge four months ago was not necessarily Stonehenge itself, but the landscape surrounding. There are many burial mounds all around in the surrounding fields and they would have been built by people completely genetically different to the original builders yet they still venerated the site. For thousands of years of prehistory, across different cultures, the site was hugely significant - and that's just amazing.
From that Anglo Saxon origin study I believe they were saying that a late arriving group probably from France that had genetics exactly similar to Iron age French came after the Anglo-Saxons period and contributed to the genetics of England but not Ireland, Scotland or Wales. It is not Norman but Merovingian time period most likely
It's actually a second Celtic migration from before Anglo-Saxons, and even before Roman occupation. It affected all of Ireland and Scotland, but had no affect on Wales in particular. This is probably from a group of Gaul or Belgae-like British ancestors more similar to the Gauls the Romans knew, and less like "native" Britons who'd already been settled in the British Isles for quite some time. I also suspect, although this is pure speculation, that this is why the Gauls are often depicted quite similarly to the Irish, including clothing and red hair, whereas pockets of England and pretty much all of Wales have a more distinct look not typically associated with the way ancient Celts are depicted.
I would be interested in more info on the Welsh. You kind of glossed over that they showed more of early hunter gathers.
I’d love to see a video about them!
And - the genetic connection to northwest costal England. I read that the dna is very closely related, both being WHG rooted?
Your not a welsh🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
They were abducted by aliens.
Scouser here , mainly Irish dna with some Scottish Welsh English and Norwegian thrown in
Dubliner here, some Scouser dna ( me granny 🙂 ) , Scandinavian & Irish too.
@@paulfogarty7724 same blood mate 💪🏼
Your not a viking or irie🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent your not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not a real race...
Englishman here with Scots-Irish, English, Welsh, and Danish DNA on the one side, and Spanish, Basque, and Taino on the other.
I have Scot, Irish, English, and some German blood but mostly Scottish and Irish. I also have blonde hair and blue-grey eyes similar.
I’m pretty Scottish with some Irish and Scandinavian
My family is of the Gunn clan and from Shetland
Your not a viking🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
Shetland has a lot of Norse DNA.
@@stephfoxwell4620 slavic caucasian DNA rh positive aka rhesus monkey is nilot south africa lol not black hebrew Scott like Campbell's and Douglas we have them here in Wolverhampton who everyone knows not you guys🤣🤣🤭🤭🤭
We are in the knowing but we dont mind your show with a little popcorn🤣🤣🤡
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
I have stage four non-small cell lung cancer and I’m going to die pretty soon so I hope you tell me my where exactly I came from. If you could read everything that I type I don’t know if they lied to me, but I trust you.
God bless you, ✝️
You come from wonderfully strong, fierce, determined and hardy people.
God be with you, by your side. Guaranteed your ancestors will be waiting on the other side to tell all their secrets when you arrive ❤️
I wish you well 🍻
Maybe you can try doing a DNA test, there are a lot of private companies who do it like MyHeritatge, i hope it helps.
just look in the mirror. thats your genetics
I think that there is a lot of deception about our origins, some are keen to make out that we are a nation of immigrants not native people aboriginal to these islands.
I don't agree:
Prehistoric and Genetic Foundations
**1. Paleolithic and Mesolithic Periods:**
- **Early Inhabitants:** The earliest known inhabitants of the British Isles were hunter-gatherers who arrived around 800,000 years ago. These populations were part of the broader human migrations out of Africa.
**2. Neolithic Period:**
- **Agricultural Revolution:** Around 4000 BCE, Neolithic farmers from the Near East and Anatolia migrated into Europe, bringing with them farming techniques. These groups intermixed with the indigenous hunter-gatherer populations, leading to the establishment of early farming communities in Britain.
**3. Bronze Age:**
- **Beaker Culture:** Around 2500 BCE, the Beaker people, known for their distinctive pottery, migrated into Britain. They brought new technologies, such as metalworking, and contributed to the genetic makeup of the population.
- **Yamnaya Influence:** The Beaker people are believed to have origins connected to the Yamnaya culture from the Pontic-Caspian steppe (modern-day Ukraine and Russia). Genetic studies suggest a significant influx of Yamnaya DNA, particularly associated with the R1b Y-DNA haplogroup, which became prevalent in Western Europe, including Britain.
### Historical Migrations and Influences
**1. Iron Age and Celtic Britain:**
- **Celtic Tribes:** By the Iron Age, Celtic tribes known as Britons inhabited the region. They spoke Celtic languages and had a distinct culture that dominated the British Isles before the Roman invasion.
**2. Roman Britain (43-410 CE):**
- **Roman Conquest:** The Roman Empire invaded and occupied Britain, introducing Roman culture, infrastructure, and governance. The Roman influence lasted for nearly 400 years, leaving a lasting impact on British society, though the genetic impact was relatively minimal.
**3. Anglo-Saxon Period (5th-11th Century):**
- **Anglo-Saxon Migration:** After the Roman withdrawal, Anglo-Saxon tribes (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes) from present-day Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands migrated to Britain. This migration had a profound cultural and linguistic impact, as Old English, a Germanic language, became dominant.
- **Genetic Contribution:** The Anglo-Saxons contributed significantly to the genetic makeup of the English people. Studies suggest that modern English populations have a substantial proportion of their ancestry from these Germanic tribes.
**4. Viking Invasions (8th-11th Century):**
- **Norse Influence:** Viking invasions and settlements, particularly by Danes and Norwegians, further shaped the genetic and cultural landscape. Norsemen established the Danelaw in parts of England, influencing local customs, law, and language.
**5. Norman Conquest (1066):**
- **Norman Rule:** The Norman Conquest brought Norman-French culture and governance. While the Normans did not significantly alter the genetic landscape, their influence on the English language, law, and aristocratic structures was substantial.
### Genetic Studies and Haplogroups
**1. Y-DNA Haplogroups:**
- **R1b:** The most common Y-DNA haplogroup in Western Europe, including England, is R1b, associated with the Yamnaya and subsequent migrations, including the Beaker culture.
- **I1 and I2:** These haplogroups are also present in significant numbers, particularly in regions with historical Viking settlement.
**2. Autosomal DNA:**
- **Mixed Heritage:** Genetic studies of autosomal DNA (inherited from both parents) reveal a mixed heritage, reflecting contributions from Paleolithic hunter-gatherers, Neolithic farmers, Indo-European steppe herders, and subsequent historical migrations.
### Cultural and Linguistic Development
**1. Language Evolution:**
- **Old English:** The language evolved from the Germanic dialects of the Anglo-Saxons, with influences from Old Norse due to Viking interactions.
- **Middle English:** Post-Norman Conquest, English incorporated a significant number of Norman-French words, evolving into Middle English.
- **Modern English:** The Renaissance and subsequent historical developments further enriched the English language, leading to the Modern English spoken today.
**2. Cultural Synthesis:**
- **Cultural Layers:** The culture of England is a synthesis of its diverse historical influences, from Celtic and Roman to Anglo-Saxon, Viking, and Norman elements.
### Conclusion
The English people are the product of numerous waves of migration and cultural assimilation, starting from ancient hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers, through Indo-European migrations, and significant historical events such as the Roman occupation, Anglo-Saxon settlement, Viking invasions, and Norman Conquest. Genetic studies reveal a complex tapestry of ancestries, with significant contributions from various ancient and medieval populations.
You are correct in perceiving the attempt to divest ethnic Europeans from Europe (and not just in the UK, either) and pretend they do not constitute native indigeny there, nor have unique cultures or languages.
It is purely a political attack by insecure, hateful, and bitter people whining about the past and who now wish to engage in mass revisionist history to benefit themselves. They claim this laughably as "social justice." It's just thinly veiled misdirected retaliation.
Cheddar Man is not the only human remains found in Gough's Cave in Cheddar Gorge. There were earlier human remains found in the cave, although it can be said that they had an interesting diet and interesting drinking vessels.
The bell breakers did come up from Galicia . Asturias, Basqueland and then went to Ireland.
The bell beakers in Iberia barely had Steppes influx with info we have until now... so no
Typical First Nation Briton is 55% Ancient Briton , 30% Anglo-Saxon, 4-7% Norse or Norman, 2-3% Neanderthal, with bits of Italian, Eastern European ,Dutch and Hugeunot French.
I see you everywhere. You are so desperate to discredit the English peoples ethnicity and origin. Stop it!
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz No.
I am a British patriot.
Keen to point out basic facts.
@@stephfoxwell4620 don't like your own comment. Sure, you are a ("British") patriot of some sort
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz I have spent my 61 years studying our history. Yes.
I spend every Armistice Day in Belgium visiting the graves of our forebears.
I make no apology for the pride I have in my people.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz, she is a British patriot 💯.I often follow her comments on other channels and have for a long time.She’s the real deal.
Could I suggest the works of Sheila McGregor such as 'Archaic Gaelic: Decoding a Lost Language: 5 (Culture and Language)' She believes that English and Scots Gaelic speakers moved in from Doggerland during the ice age and examines names in the landscape as well as other things to support her work.
I'm glad you give my haplogroup I2a2 a mention. We are still around.
My great-grandfather came to England in 1902 from Dublin, I could never understand why. I thought the Irish didn't like the English..Especially then
Don't confuse the opinions of the loud political crowd with the average individual just working their way through life. Migration across the islands has happened ever since the first boats.
Mix of English and Scots.. through marriages I'm actually more Scottish DNA wise but both my English and Scottish ancestors married into the Norman families. My mother's J2 haplogroup Montgomery's that were once in the west of Scotland were originally Norman.
do you know anything about y-haplogroup R-S5741? it seems very rarely mentioned but it's hinted as being from northern europe
Fascinating!
Great Information that's Why this one of Best' ch. On youtube 😊❤🇮🇪☘️🏴🇺🇲💯🏴
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people
@@alsteff6785 Fake Moor
@@PatrickFitzgerald88 just because I debunked your slavic Edomite caucasian ancestry you dont needn't tag me in random shit what a weirdo🤣🤣🤣😂😂
I LOVE THIS CHANNEL!
Thanks
my ancient dna is celtic , i done few dna tests , 23and me said my male line has ancient dna connection to that of neil of nine hostages , and also my true ancestry website also says that irish connection, and gives me large of uk celtic tribes , and pictish dna too small about 4.9 %and less viking and saxon than that of celtic
British isles are not the pattern of Celtic! please stop this.
@@isoldatraducoes well can you explain your idea of your comment in death ,if you cant say what you mean then don't comment
@@thomaskerr2477 ?
Great movie ❤
The Welsh have more white skin with dark hair and dark eyes ,like Zeta Jones. The rest of England has pretty much blue eyes.The Scotts have brown hair with blue eyes and the Irish blue eyes fair skin and light hair;though originall Irish had olive skin ,dark eyes and dark hair.What happened ? How did the Irish become lighter ?
This obsession with colour 🙄
I wish we had more information on what Norman genetics were and is it true France had some protestors block it or their own laws for some reason? Genealogical research has no downsides I can imagine so idk what phantom they’re chasing. I have extensive branches of family that is all Norman French and some Flemish names that were anglicized and even Scottish like Comyn was originally from Flanders even tho the descendants led to Scott’s like John Knox was in there. The line of Dunkeld Scottish kings eventually married into the Normans as well. I’d like to see a widespread genealogical analysis of Norman names and lines and see if any of it held up in any meaningful manner. My presumption is over time it blended into society almost entirely. But I wonder if there’s any still around with a majority Norman ancestry what a case study that would be. I find it fascinating how Vikings and Germanic people were integrationists taking on customs of places they came to dominate when usually you see people forcing their language or culture on others. Like arabization, Turkification, Anglicizing, the Hispanic world, Hanifying in China, etc. Norman’s seemed to do something unique. Even Hungarians were an outside group who genetically are closer to those around them than their linguistic counterparts but they still came to dominate as a culture others took in.
informative and concise, thank you
Thanks
My mother in law is u5a1, she has deep roots in western Ireland ❤
So, it’s original hunter-gatherer? Very cool.
Me, watching and seeing all our family haplos 😅
My husband’s is R-Z18079 (downstream of R-M269.) On 23 and me it’s relatively rare: 1 in 4,000 men have it.
So his mom’s most recent mito foremother was WHG and his most recent Y forefather was Bell beaker (yamnaya derived)
As the archaeology shows, and in real life, the invaders loved those local ladies ❤
Then there’s me, with mito h6a1b2 which is Yamnayan. I like to think this foremother rode out with her husband or brothers to raid and win land, but who knows. She could have been the laundry wench or something worse 😅
I wonder how many women were actually known to ride out from the East with the guys? I’m sure a few did. It’s a fun idea!
My dad is also downstream of R-m269 with R-Z253, which if our paper trail is correct, comes out of Western Germany. But, it’s also possible it was a NPE… he was a 35 year old newly arrived cabinet maker from Baden and married an 19 year old Irish maid via justice of the peace at an orphanage. Maybe she was already pregnant! 😅
If he was the dad (and I hope so, I took two years of German! lol) then maybe that original forefather was a bell beaker who stayed behind on the mainland? 😂
Thanks for another awesome video. It’s fun to plug in your own DNA data to the various studies coming out and effectively see where and when it could possibly link in the greater timeline of Ireland and the British Isles.
Your not a irie 🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
@@alsteff6785 You're so jealous of me because i carry the R1b-L21 haplogroup.
What is the story of, The Gallowglass Vikings of West Scottish and Vikings moving to Ireland?
They were Gaelic speaking Norse Gaels or Gall Ghaeil and as such were perfect as royal bodyguards and heavy infantry. At the same time as they were culturally and linguistically compatible, they were removed from internecine tribal politics and were loyal unto death. Initially, they worked seasonally, returning to western Scotland for the winter. Eventually, many Gallowglass established themselves permanently in the clans they served. Over time and with intermarriage these Gallowglass became predominantly Irish Gaels, although their Scottish cousins continued to serve intermittently.
@@johndanielharold3633 Thank you for your detailed and informative reply. 😎
@@johndanielharold3633super interesting! I have some highland ancestry from N. Uist and only learning about these guys. Norse gael Gallowglass, cool!
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
“Gal” “Glas” clue is in the name. They were Britons! Anyone with a decent amount of historical knowledge about the Britons and their language (Cymraeg) would recognise those words.
the opening map is good on showing the ice. it would be cool if the landmasses, Doggerland etc., were shown
My Daughter x paid for me to have a DNA test I am 50% Norse via Iceland 24% Welsh 10% Irish .
I’m an American. I traced my family back to 1730 and it was 100% English. But I had my DNA analyzed and it came back 100% Irish.
Aren’t you lucky.
Ships only sailed from Ireland or England so there are alot of people who believe they're from the either and they could be wrong.
Your not a english🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
DNA can’t tell the difference between Irish and English. So I would ask for my money back from bogus DNA test
Such a rollercoaster of emotions, sad happy and sad again.
Lighter skin and Blue Eyes both due to less Melanin in the tissue.
Did the two occur at the same time and are they linked?
Is this linked to the Lactose Tolerance mutation?
All three mutations occured at the same time?
No. Native Urals and steppes have fairly light skin.
Your not a us🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south african
@@alsteff6785 Bantoid gorilla man with no genealogical records.
Were not the Normans originally vikings anyway? ‘North-men’? Presumably the DNA of Normans would reflect their Scandinavian heritage. The whole skin colour thing you went into has been pretty much debunked as being total conjecture and not really worthy of mention in a serious discussion btw
I'm guessing that they were mainly "French" genetically because of interbreeding
The normans might be desended from norse people but they're not the same. They have been mixing with the franks (French) for generations. So their Scandinavian blood have been very diluted.
@@shailingkhongmalai9515 Also wasn't northern France once "Gaul"" so presumably R1b Celts - and the Franks were Germanic but also R1b ? (R1a ?) - Scandinavians either I1 or R1a or R1b - and that is just the men what of the women ?
Thankyou.
You might look at the general ("ok twice, but that's a lot more than one would think"--meme) Viking attitude about saying 'well ok, this time we raid instead of trade', as being indicative of a general period of continued interaction, of which we get only the "interesting" highlights in the sagas. [Oh, and then there's "religion" to consider. Shhh. Unless you have a lot of time... et cetera.] Also, you may find the back-story on "Galgedil UO" an interestingly baffling example, at least from the genetic haplogroup perspective, versus the isotopic results, versus the overall timeline, all reasonably readable at PLOS. (ish, I barely followed it, and walked away with "more to see here, hopefully, in the future anyway" as my best takeaway). Oh yeah my point! That being that that might be why all these dano-frisians are hard to tell apart, genetically! Good call. :) [Me Y downstream from I-M284, so if not ex-IE WHG, then paralllel to them, it seems, at this time anyway.] Also keeping in mind that all these haplogroups were representative in multiple waves, so you'd need to get very specific, for any of them, if you are lucky. Cheers! [USA]
I have bell beaker phenotype rb1 l21 plus I have Norwegian and Finnish kven finn I love your videos and the science behind that plus you tell it like it is cheers and thank you
Interesting. Thanks
Your not a viking🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away
Lol your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south african
@alsteff6785 No it isn't. "Caucasian" is merely the proper designation for those ethnicities living in or around the Caucasus Mountain Range.
My HAPLOGROUP is R- DF13:: was for when it branched off from the ancestor RS552 and the rest of the mankind around 2600BCE this state is an estimate based on genetic information only with 95% probability the ancestor of RS55 was born between the year, 3235 and 2009 BCE. Y- DNA
I`m R 1 B and RM-269
Caucasian is a neanderthal group also known as the wild man your not the moorish people of the Convent tour not brits but call your self british and jew-ish your not the people your south africans lol
@@alsteff6785 You wish you had the same haplogroup as me.
Cheers mate
Cheers
Guy sounds like Tommy from Come Fly With Me
On my paternal Grand-Fathers side I have Western Hunter Gatherer DNA and Neolithic DNA. On my Paternal Grand Mothers DNA I have Bell Beaker DNA, from my Mothers DNA I am almost 100% Bell Beaker. I think it's safe to say my family's been here for a little while 😂
You haven't mentioned that the 2022 paper describes a significant third component of the English gene pool besides the native Britons (England LIA) and immigrant Anglo-Saxons (England EMA CNE-like). A component that existed in Early Medieval times but that kept coming for longer than the CNE component (effectively watering it down).
Maybe no one is interested in this because it's not as cool as having North Germanic (pirate/gangster) ancestry. Maybe the France IA component is too clean shaven. Maybe you just skipped it because you're not from England and it barely affects you.
It seems pretty clear though. We have far more Gallic ancestry than Viking ancestry. And I suspect that has a lot to do with resistance.
As a Mercian I would just like to thank the West Saxons for their support in crushing the Danelaw whilst the much more civilised France IA ancestors were welcomed with open arms.
You actually think frnce ia was welcomed. We are Germanic, deal with it.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace (Romanised softies 😂). The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits. Estimates from this study suggest that the English are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic"). I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it and made Modern English babies (diluting their own CNE ancestry). They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace. The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits. Estimates from this study suggest that the present-day English are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic").
I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it and made babies (diluting their own CNE ancestry). They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz France IA were welcomed because they came in peace. The Vikings were sent packing because they were trouble making bandits who had no respect for the sabbath. Estimates from this study suggest that the present-day population are 36% "Germanic" and 62% "Celtic" (34% "Britonic" plus 28% "Gallic").
I know you don't like that France IA component but the Anglo-Saxons married it. They are your ancestors. Maybe you should celebrate them.
@@ColaSpandex "came in peace". You trolling boy. I ain't falling for it
The vikings into England were mostly danish. The vikings into Ireland were Norwegian.
And the Vikings into Wales…oh wait. The Britons handled them with ease.
Danes in Dublin were the most powerful
The English are foreigners to these Isles!
But they are not foreigner's to Angleland - they ARE Angleland
Not totally
I’m so sorry to correct you but according to BBC C4 the founders an earliest inhabitants of Britain an Ireland were sub Saharan Africans so please re check your research with the main broadcasters an knowledge Thankyou
Don’t be stupid!
And you believe anything from the BBC?
😂😂😂
@@JayArgonautshe’s being sarcastic!
@@northernlights6459 That one escaped me obviously😂😂😂
Why didn't my DNA show Norman?
Your not a viking🤣🤣 your slavic and south African that's your fantasy that's why you stole the heritage and sent the carribeans away your a nilot
Because they had little to no impact genetically
@@user-ii4zf5iq3t because you slavic south African nilot not hebrews.... you double crossed your self✝️
@@user-ii4zf5iq3t because your slavic caucasian south African not hebrew moors you double crossed your selves ✝️into slavery🤡
The Norman’s where a mixture of Scandinavian, Breton and Frankish (Celtic Germanic) people so very similar to the existing Anglo - Brythonic mix already in England so measuring the genetic impact is impossible because genetically the same/very similar.
SLO-mo farmer shot ruined by chem-trail sky😂
I want my reparations
You'd only spend it on drink
Bell beakers were lost tribes of israel and japheth
Yes and the we belong to Cucumber race
Why isn't there more Italian blood in Britain after 400 years of occupation?
Because the Roman army consisted of a huge variety of conquered/allied peoples .
We have no Roman blood
Only the Britons (Welsh) have partial Roman blood!
Also, Romans weren’t Italian, in the modern sense. They are more closely related to the Etruscans. Britons, Romans and Etruscans all claimed descent from Troy. With the Britons only ones being laughed at for it. And even when they have the most evidence.
The Ice-Age will return, it is not possible for humans to control that.
WHITE COUNTRY, NEVER BEEN ANYTHING ELSE,
Except that the first waves of white settlers were black.
@@gwyn2 HOW can white be black, moon, ALL immigrants in the past were WHITE, blacks would not even have known about the world outside their land
'
@@gwyn2 Blacks were taller then caucasians and probably they hunted neanderthal people too
@@gwyn2 I2 haplogroup is not E or A or B which are African - there is no evidence of African genetics - you conflate White people that tan for African ? or Asian ? or Middle Eastern ? is that to justify theft of property they did not build ?
Ugh ugh white ugh ugh white
I'd love to hear more about women's Haplogroups in the UK....in case it's been studied....
100% tarn genetics here! Thats barnsley tarn strong in arm n thick in head......
I have blonde red hair I have blue eyes and my blood type is. O NEGATIVE RH NEGATIVE BLOOD TYPE ,, CAN YOU PLEASE TELL ME MORE ABOUT MY DNA AND I LOVE LOVE LOVE THIS CHANNEL🌼✝️🙌🏻
I have A- RH negative blood type 😁
O Negative Rh negative
We can’t tell much about your DNA based on such limited information. If you want to know more, you will have to do a DNA test.
@@Stoggler I have tested my dna with 2 companies.
@@Emaof13 I was responding to Godschild’s comment (or I thought I was anyway)
Unfortunately you have such a very strong accent I can hardly understand a word you are saying.
Hit the CC button for captions
Sounds like someone reading from a phone book as fast as possible in a thick Scottish accent. Teleprompters are a great help if used properly but this video makes my ears hurt.
Don’t bloody well listen then you moaner.
Watch something else then
"Sounds like someone reading from a phone book as fast as possible in a thick Scottish accent" Totally disagree - I'm English and understood every word, his accent is not 'thick' at all. His delivery was possibly a bit faster than a professional broadcaster, but I thought it was fine, he got the facts over - what more do you want?
@@ronhall9394 Not English, just American and I understood! ✌🏻
@@celtichistorydecodedIt was an informative video but you were very fast,please in future videos could you slow down a bit to allow some of us to absorb and understand the information?😊
Google the history of the "Galatian" people (Gaul, Gaels - Celts) and their migrations - 600 BC++
And they are only one group among many splinter groups of "Israel."
They're not the only ones but that is where you can find real historical proof of what has happened fairly quickly.
"But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." - Matt. 15:24 "…and Ephraim is my firstborn." Jere. 31:9
… and the Celts (Galatians, Gaul, Gael, et al) were present in abundance in every location the Apostles, especially Paul visited and corresponded with - in Acts and every Epistle - on both sides of the Mediterranean all the way to Spain, France, Britain, Ireland, Scotland and... Northern Italy, Greece, etc. ....Them, the Phoenicians and the Romans.
The Phoenicians and the Northern tribes of Israel had documented Biblical "Brotherhood Covenant." The Bible and other records say they were seafarers - traders - together.
History, including Roman and Greek, record the rest.
And do you know why the word for Wales is in the Romance languages? Pays De Galles or a variation of that. Meaning the land of the Gauls. The clue is always in the languages! Keep a look out for the GAL!
@@WalesTheTrueBritons Look at Duet. 7:1 The land God told Israel to conquer and possess... the very first one is the "Hittites" - the Hittite Kingdom was in 'Anatolia,' modern day Turkey.
That's the land of the "Galatians."
They never took it but ended up there anyway!! lol
It will soon be Arabic and Pakistani.
You would have thought they would have been happy to have dishwashing machines and cars and planes and plastic and just stayed where they were and no over populated - they were let in to steal property by teaming up with commercialists and landlords
And now, genetics from Pakistan, Nigeria, Romania, Albania... Diversity is our strength 🤨
Except they don't seem to have much visible diversity compared to European's they all look the same to me - but they make good renters and consumers and local anarchists to drive owner's to move and make more rentals for landlords
Answer: not good anymore. Need to shake up those genes on the islands.
Why?
U do know we are some of the highest I.Q, tallest most ingenious people on this planet, just look at the inventions that have come from these isles!
And Mary came to know her husband she had many children, and God gave her wings to fly into our nation
And Jesus Christ, Adam Eve Mary, Matthew Mark, Luke, John Peter Paul, Sarah, Samuel David Daniel, Jacob, Joseph John Elijah Elizabeth, Abraham, Enoch, Jesus Christ, who has God in the flesh Emmanuel is with us, Jehovah king king of Kings, Lord of the Lords, alpha and Omega please read about those wonderful people in the Bible✝️
Names in a myth.
Sigh...
Your talking a bit too fast..It's hard for my hearing to catch up with you..I do have very good hearing as well..Slow your talking down a bit..You would think you were in a hurry to get everything spoken quickly...
When wild men think their the moors acting to their selves tricking nobody 😫😫😫😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wild men ? Moors ? you write so cryptically can you spell it out or is that a Moorish deficiency ?
You're not a Moor seeing as your ancestors were West/Central African nice try though.
@@TotalFreedomTTT-pk9st He's one of those "black" Americans who larps as a North African Berber/Amazigh.
@@PatrickFitzgerald88 you dont tell me who I am I tell you nice try and we have maroon community in jamica and hebrew ones and were fully aware😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@PatrickFitzgerald88 and black american? Your making no sence bigfoot?
The early europeans were black hebrews carribeans lol caucasians are slavic peoples not actual genetically identified to europe but south africa
? Black people are everyone by all accounts. They Hebrews, Romans, British, Native Indians, Aboriginal peoples, Jews. They need to make their mind up!
So all Europeans have the right to return to their origins in Africa!
@@nickjung7394 south I believe
@@nickjung7394 What would be a nice trade is bring back all the Dutch Africkan's and European British and send back everything else that was not voted on by the people of Britain to their genetic homelands - then they will stop complaining and be home at last with their people
@@alsteff6785 Yes South Africa and West Africa belongs to us Europeans and East Africa belongs to Arabs and North Africans. Now tell your people to get out of those lands.
Your not carribean your caucasians from south Africa
Why do you write in English ? shouldn't you be writing in your native language ? and typing on your native inventions ? (which would be what ?????)
@@TotalFreedomTTT-pk9st ight cool i will speak Hebrew next time
@@alsteff6785 That was a quick response - thanks for the reply - Hebrew I definitely do not understand
@@alsteff6785 You can't speak Hebrew nor can you pronounce the words the right way.
@@TotalFreedomTTT-pk9st This guy isn't very intelligent.