@@remekficko Are you working for them? Not sure if you are. We have to check what's safe and what harmful. Like having professional investigation was going on
3 years after Grenfell and we are still faced with this issue? Our Government needs to take action... we should not be allowing people in 2021 to live in unsafe housing!
@Susan Reed ived lived 1year on the streets...and yes its QUITE an exciting experience, ived lived on rented house 4yrs, 20 yrs in my own appartment. BUT nothing is like a piece of LAND all of your own wich i have now ! :) ONLY FREE MOTEL rooms are THE BEST :D ived lived 1month in a free of charge 3stars motel room. I was in heaven there :D
@@rrialb9371 With a reply like that, it’s very clear you lack social skills. They are to blame and should rectify it. Keep your comment and reply to yourself you prick
developer/builder/government should all pay for this! how can you expect leaseholders who paid full prices already needing to fork out even more on a place they already paid for?
My sister is in this situation. Building survey revealed her balcony is partially constructed of plywood....totally illegal. Somehow signed off. Her flat is about 10 years old. What a joke, on the phone in tears every day in despair. Thanks to the greedy builders, greedy government. Why bother going to work and paying a mortgage. Girls, open your legs, push out a few kids and get the same flat for free and no worries about the repair costs.
The only way flat owners will ever see justice is through protest. We need to take to the streets, protest outside our flats, protest at the house builders. HQ, protest at Parliament, block roads, raise awareness of our plight. If we suffer in silence, we will end up footing the bill!
You build it, you fix it! Media coverage seems to focus only on the poor leaseholder. Why aren't they sticking their camera in the landlord, developers faces?
This is disgusting but not surprising. It IS NOT THE RESIDENTS FAULT OR RESPONSIBILITY - this is SO typical of local authorities and businesses - this story makes me SICK of this country - HELP THESE RESIDENTS !!!!
Why is removal of cladding and plastering a new one - so expensive? what are the cheaper options to increase safety? In Ukraine we have a obligation to mount a row of a non-flammable material row every two floors, if most of the cladding is done with the flammable materials. This helps to stop spreading the fire, in case... Is such an option considered in UK? Are there any efforts/policies analyzed to make the cladding process cheaper? The prices seem to be horribly high as for now.
The Goverment should pay for it. Its their flaw in the original regulation that allowed the use of those flammable cladding. The builders built the property using the Government's code, so they need to pay for it.
I understand what you mean, however I work in electrical manufacturing and installtion and we have to follow the 18th Edition for domstic wiring regs and many other certification protocols, there are many homes which were built using the 17th edition and below which were all fine for the time that they are built, however when the regs get updated every 5-10 years etc, usually the homeoweners are the ones left with the job of making sure the property is up to code to meet the current regulations. If their house was built on say the 17th edition or below for there lighting circuit etc. You can't go to the Electrical association or the body that came up with the regulations and say we need you to pay for all the home owners that want to renovate or update to the current electrical regualtions before home imporvements can be done thats just ridiculous. Regs always get updated, new regs will take over even the current regs we have now as only via fatal accidents such as grenfell lead to regulations changing otherwise every regulation or code of condult procedures would remain the same as nothing challanged the current regulation from being updated. There are many consumers / end users that do not understand this but what is explained above can be applied to the cladding situation also, as well as many other regualtors that update the regs from learning from mistakes its the only way to get one step safer... to learn from accidents and amend the paperwork, this process will never end nothing is ever perfect and things in all catagories of trade, services and goods have to abide by more and more updated rules and legislation etc, can only take it one step at a time. Unfortuntely someone has to foot the bill, which turns into a blame game and can be diffucult to lay 100% of the responsibility on. I do agree that for any external part of a building i does seem like common sense to apply a fire proof solution (you you can't rely on the occupants to just use common sense by say not putting out a cigarette by the cladding or flicking it off the balcony which could get loged etc etc that will never work), but unfortunely because there was barely any attention to the cladding situation until recently (probably because things like this just didnt happen at the rate it is now...), it is now a mandatory requirement to update to the current regulations to save lives and someone needs to pay for work to be done and no one works for free.
I have to pay £2500 a year for my insurance on my flat now because of the flammable insulation, on top of the £2400 per year service charge. Plus the estimate £10k - £15k to have the insulation replaced next year..... I have had to move back in with my parents and rent my flat out. No idea where I am going to get the money for the remedial works.....
@@jonnsonsam I bought the flat when I was quite young (22) and liked the idea of being in the city centre so I can be closer to the party scene. Now that I am 33 the novelty has certainly worn off. Once the insulation issue has been fixed I'll be selling and buying a house with a nice garden. Not buying a flat again, especially leasehold....
Oh my god! Why are all these people paying for somebody else’s mistake? Why is the government not protecting vulnerable people in their own homes?? Uk? What’s going on?
Dreadful it should be replaced immediately by who authorized it... people living in fear of inflamable cladding of a possibility of losing there lives while they sleep, returning home from work or shopping and losing everything total disgrace.
This is grossly absurd to dump the burden of the cost onto the homeowner. The builder should be hit with a class action lawsuit and be sued for damages due to gross negligence in the design and the choice of materials that would put homeowners at risk of peril, fire and death. The minimum building code is never enough. It needs to be updated for the safest homes, not just the homes that would generate the highest profit margins for the developer and builder. This is going to leave a permanent impact on the price of these properties, making them unattractive to new buyers after the remediation work is completed and the cost baked into the selling price and maintenance fees. There’s no one coming to save these homeowners. Buyers beware! Get an inspection done before purchase, even if it’s a condominium or apartment. A home inspection is always worth it to prevent headaches like these homeowners are experiencing. Make sure the inspector is legitimate, unbiased and always attend the inspection with the inspector and have your own list of questions ready to be asked after you do your homework before purchase.
@@WavScorn259 all to true I am afraid.. those service companies should be sorted out... the insurance companies they wont get near but the service companies they can be regulated easier
@@jumbo4billion you mean El Presidenty?? well the Big Blonde clown is on his way out and so it seems is the small Blonde clown.. maybe things can change.. probably not we got the border in Kent now.. wonder if he'll build a wall there ?
government should pay for it as they gave a "go ahead " for subcontractors ..... wtf.... but at the same time .... not surprised....we have to pay extra for gov and councils mistakes
@@garethhanby because the government had approved the materials and standards which now are considered unsafe. People were buying these properties in a good faith believing they are safe to live in. Now because of the government change of mind these people are left with huge bills. And because both decisions were made by the goverment that are the ones to sort it out. Imaging spending upwards of 500,000 on a car which happens to be a death trap by the law and you cannot use it. What do you do? You go to a dealer to return it but the dealer says it was legal when you bought it. Not my problem. Are you accepting your loss? Maybe. You can live without a car. A bit harder without home.
Iv been told i must pay £80,000 to repair a building i dont own. I own 35% of a tiny flat, i only own the inside of the flat i paid £41,000 for my share An i must pay to repair the landlords poorly built building!!! Please help!!!!!!! #EndOurCladdingScandal
They were up to regulation when built. Regulators work with government bodies to decide if something is safe or not, they decided to use cheap cladding even though it was flammable in order to save the government money on building new homes. The government and the regulators are corrupt as hell, they need to be sued, they need to pay for everything and the people responsible, who made the decision to pass these fire hazards as 'safe', need to go to jail.
We've been told it might be £140,000 per flat for the leaseholders in our building. I'm actually jealous of the people with only £15,000 of unplanned costs.
Its not the cladding that flammable its the air gap behind it that intensify the heat of a building fire it acts like a one way system for flames and that's up
If these are tenants why do they have to pay the cost? Surely its down to the building landlords, after all they are still or already have drawn the rents from these people. Lets face it, if these tenants move out, they won't be re renting cause no one will want to live there.
No, the fast way is simply to remove it, because coating the old cladding means that it has to be tested and then authorized, that is a very long process indeed . Fire hazard is a very serious matter.
@@Locutus and pay up. There the ones at the end of the day who gave legislation for the material to be used when it shouldnt have. its not rocket science
I think the very last thing on any owners mind would be worrying about rebuilding the block of flats if the cladding caught fire so common sense needs to come in to play here
The cladding was a requirement of The EU under their Energy Efficiency Directive, which was put in place in order to comply with The United Nations Paris Accord. It's no coincidence that this problem is everywhere in uk and that cladding was used on the outside, and no it wasn't to give it a nicer appearance.
Actually this is down to regulations, so this is the opposite of capitalism and free markets. Energy Efficiency Regulations placed on all building passed by The EU to comply with The UN Paris Accord to have zero carbon emissions by 2050. It was originally called agenda 21, now it's called Agenda 30
maybe the bbc should have covered the banking angle. if you own a condo wouldn't a bank lend you money against it so you can pay these unforeseen bills?
Government keep allowing building them,demolishing strong much better ones,just to make a profit putting as much people as possible on a piece ol land🙈
YES ! very ! thats the 90's in Romania ...those kind of bills that makes you think '' it must be a mistake'' and then you just pay it :D I sold my house for one of these in the 90's and brought another worser
@@louispugsleybirch8212 At one time in this country it was thought that living next to a sub-station would give you cancer, and the houses were worthless, a few years go by, and hey presto! no problem...
Didn't that fire happened almost a century ago? Why bother mention this flammable cladding again, when Bojo couldn't even handle the stupid virus that he himself got hooked on ventilator for?
If my people who are called by my name humble themselves and pray, AND TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS, I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sins, and will heal their land. And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him. This, then, is how you should pray: Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us today our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one. For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins. "Matthew 5-7 NIV Bible Gateway", we can use google search. These are the teachings, The Righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ our God. REPENT, and start doing what is right. If you abide my teachings, you are really my disciples; then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. A time is coming and has now come, that the true worshipers will worship the Father in Spirit and Truth. God is Spirit, so his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and Truth; they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. In the New Heaven and New Earth, only Righteousness dwells. May the Spirit of our Lord Jesus Christ our God be with you all.
im not :( thats exactly WHY i have property instead of appartment....cause those people DIDNT chosed their materials. its a nauseating feeling being told in WHAT to live. Let alone forced to pay for remediation. And that remediation is AGAIN not for you to chose wich materials!
Who should pay?!? Excuse me?!? The contractor who built these buildings should be the ones to pay!!
I understand that those claddings were up to code when those were built. The code changed meanwhile, didn't it?
@@remekficko All flats should be safe if not rebuild it and pay the flat owners back.
@@happytimmy7260 yes, I agree, safety first. I'm just not sure, it's the contractors fault.
@@remekficko Are you working for them?
Not sure if you are. We have to check what's safe and what harmful. Like having professional investigation was going on
@@happytimmy7260 no, I'm not :)
I agree, investigation is needed. I simply tried to say, that it's not evidently the contractors fault.
The regulators are responsible.
You build it you fix it!
If they took so long to decide to feed kids, what makes you think they'll prioritise this?
If you cannot afford to feed your kids then you cannot afford to have kids.
I'm not paying for some other deadbeat dads kids.
The people who have the children (bring them into the world?) shouldn't be expected to feed them as well; that would be expecting *far* too much!
@@macclift9956 during an economic crisis in which people have no jobs
@@unionofconcernedpolarbears1006 so your ok with kids starving
That is what will happen if the government doesnt help
@Connor Cook holy fuck, step outside of partisan politics for a literal second
3 years after Grenfell and we are still faced with this issue? Our Government needs to take action... we should not be allowing people in 2021 to live in unsafe housing!
You know, costs are always more important than lives
@Base stack them sideways, I always say
@Susan Reed ived lived 1year on the streets...and yes its QUITE an exciting experience, ived lived on rented house 4yrs, 20 yrs in my own appartment. BUT nothing is like a piece of LAND all of your own wich i have now ! :) ONLY FREE MOTEL rooms are THE BEST :D ived lived 1month in a free of charge 3stars motel room. I was in heaven there :D
0:41'I now have to eat pasta!'
A studio flat is £350k in a flammable block of flats in South London. Perfect...
bluntay Let it burn? What about the poor schlub who is still paying off their Right to Buy mortgage?
The building companies who built those properties with the architects should be stumping up the cost of this surely!
@@rrialb9371 With a reply like that, it’s very clear you lack social skills. They are to blame and should rectify it. Keep your comment and reply to yourself you prick
developer/builder/government should all pay for this! how can you expect leaseholders who paid full prices already needing to fork out even more on a place they already paid for?
It's very very simple: who wrongly decided it was safe in the first place? The persons who made this error take the cost.
How can leaseholders be liable for this? What an absolute nightmare.
I know right, 0:42 this poor man has been forced to eat pasta....
My sister is in this situation. Building survey revealed her balcony is partially constructed of plywood....totally illegal. Somehow signed off. Her flat is about 10 years old. What a joke, on the phone in tears every day in despair. Thanks to the greedy builders, greedy government. Why bother going to work and paying a mortgage. Girls, open your legs, push out a few kids and get the same flat for free and no worries about the repair costs.
The only way flat owners will ever see justice is through protest. We need to take to the streets, protest outside our flats, protest at the house builders. HQ, protest at Parliament, block roads, raise awareness of our plight. If we suffer in silence, we will end up footing the bill!
You build it, you fix it! Media coverage seems to focus only on the poor leaseholder. Why aren't they sticking their camera in the landlord, developers faces?
Alot of those freeholders are companies literally listed on the London Stock Exchange.
No one can mess with them ...
This is disgusting but not surprising. It IS NOT THE RESIDENTS FAULT OR RESPONSIBILITY - this is SO typical of local authorities and businesses - this story makes me SICK of this country - HELP THESE RESIDENTS !!!!
Never buy a condo.
Why is removal of cladding and plastering a new one - so expensive? what are the cheaper options to increase safety? In Ukraine we have a obligation to mount a row of a non-flammable material row every two floors, if most of the cladding is done with the flammable materials. This helps to stop spreading the fire, in case...
Is such an option considered in UK? Are there any efforts/policies analyzed to make the cladding process cheaper? The prices seem to be horribly high as for now.
The Goverment should pay for it. Its their flaw in the original regulation that allowed the use of those flammable cladding. The builders built the property using the Government's code, so they need to pay for it.
I understand what you mean, however I work in electrical manufacturing and installtion and we have to follow the 18th Edition for domstic wiring regs and many other certification protocols, there are many homes which were built using the 17th edition and below which were all fine for the time that they are built, however when the regs get updated every 5-10 years etc, usually the homeoweners are the ones left with the job of making sure the property is up to code to meet the current regulations. If their house was built on say the 17th edition or below for there lighting circuit etc. You can't go to the Electrical association or the body that came up with the regulations and say we need you to pay for all the home owners that want to renovate or update to the current electrical regualtions before home imporvements can be done thats just ridiculous. Regs always get updated, new regs will take over even the current regs we have now as only via fatal accidents such as grenfell lead to regulations changing otherwise every regulation or code of condult procedures would remain the same as nothing challanged the current regulation from being updated. There are many consumers / end users that do not understand this but what is explained above can be applied to the cladding situation also, as well as many other regualtors that update the regs from learning from mistakes its the only way to get one step safer... to learn from accidents and amend the paperwork, this process will never end nothing is ever perfect and things in all catagories of trade, services and goods have to abide by more and more updated rules and legislation etc, can only take it one step at a time. Unfortuntely someone has to foot the bill, which turns into a blame game and can be diffucult to lay 100% of the responsibility on.
I do agree that for any external part of a building i does seem like common sense to apply a fire proof solution (you you can't rely on the occupants to just use common sense by say not putting out a cigarette by the cladding or flicking it off the balcony which could get loged etc etc that will never work), but unfortunely because there was barely any attention to the cladding situation until recently (probably because things like this just didnt happen at the rate it is now...), it is now a mandatory requirement to update to the current regulations to save lives and someone needs to pay for work to be done and no one works for free.
If the cladding met safety standards then the government has to pay.
Flammable cladding- ACP ( aluminum composite panels) cause of fire in Dubai 2-3 years back.
It was flammable from the start, it was scam. Put builders into jail, it will help them to decide faster.
Never buy flats ever!
I have to pay £2500 a year for my insurance on my flat now because of the flammable insulation, on top of the £2400 per year service charge. Plus the estimate £10k - £15k to have the insulation replaced next year..... I have had to move back in with my parents and rent my flat out. No idea where I am going to get the money for the remedial works.....
@bluntay Well, aren't you an absolute horror. Just because you are so unhappy with your life don't spread your poison around to others.
Move out of the shithole that is London. Problem solved.
@@jonnsonsam I live in Liverpool. The issue affects flats all across the UK.
@@ohwhatworld5851 Ah scouseland, given that housing is so cheap there why in the hell did you decide to move into a high rise?
@@jonnsonsam I bought the flat when I was quite young (22) and liked the idea of being in the city centre so I can be closer to the party scene. Now that I am 33 the novelty has certainly worn off. Once the insulation issue has been fixed I'll be selling and buying a house with a nice garden. Not buying a flat again, especially leasehold....
HTF cladding of a building costs 16M are they going to cover it with gold??
0:43 'I now have to eat pasta!'
Oh my god! Why are all these people paying for somebody else’s mistake? Why is the government not protecting vulnerable people in their own homes?? Uk? What’s going on?
Ukraine need weapons to blow up people
thats gruessome! :( THATS bullsh*t for exterior anything goes either polyester or glasswool . Unless someone wants to trick you into paying
Government are ignoring human life and saving money and filling their pockets with this savings.
0:43 'I now have to eat pasta...'
Dreadful it should be replaced immediately by who authorized it... people living in fear of inflamable cladding of a possibility of losing there lives while they sleep, returning home from work or shopping and losing everything total disgrace.
All the injustice is coming to the surface absolutely ridiculous.
This is grossly absurd to dump the burden of the cost onto the homeowner. The builder should be hit with a class action lawsuit and be sued for damages due to gross negligence in the design and the choice of materials that would put homeowners at risk of peril, fire and death.
The minimum building code is never enough. It needs to be updated for the safest homes, not just the homes that would generate the highest profit margins for the developer and builder.
This is going to leave a permanent impact on the price of these properties, making them unattractive to new buyers after the remediation work is completed and the cost baked into the selling price and maintenance fees.
There’s no one coming to save these homeowners. Buyers beware! Get an inspection done before purchase, even if it’s a condominium or apartment. A home inspection is always worth it to prevent headaches like these homeowners are experiencing. Make sure the inspector is legitimate, unbiased and always attend the inspection with the inspector and have your own list of questions ready to be asked after you do your homework before purchase.
What about every home that contains wood in the structure?
why is this story only coming out now?????
Its because they are slow as hell and only now they think its "good enough" to report.
@@WavScorn259 all to true I am afraid.. those service companies should be sorted out... the insurance companies they wont get near but the service companies they can be regulated easier
For at least 2 years the BBC considered the American president to be more important
@@jumbo4billion you mean El Presidenty?? well the Big Blonde clown is on his way out and so it seems is the small Blonde clown.. maybe things can change.. probably not we got the border in Kent now.. wonder if he'll build a wall there ?
government should pay for it as they gave a "go ahead " for subcontractors ..... wtf.... but at the same time .... not surprised....we have to pay extra for gov and councils mistakes
if boris can waste 150 million on face masks that where no good what so ever im sure he could sort this out
Why should the taxpayer pay for improvements to private property?
@@garethhanby because the government had approved the materials and standards which now are considered unsafe. People were buying these properties in a good faith believing they are safe to live in. Now because of the government change of mind these people are left with huge bills. And because both decisions were made by the goverment that are the ones to sort it out. Imaging spending upwards of 500,000 on a car which happens to be a death trap by the law and you cannot use it. What do you do? You go to a dealer to return it but the dealer says it was legal when you bought it. Not my problem. Are you accepting your loss? Maybe. You can live without a car. A bit harder without home.
@@garethhanby you pay for the councils tenants living near you for next to nothing... Nobody opposes this scandal.
I live near those flats only back in 2018 did they actually start putting cladding in the high raise flat I lived in my area in Cardiff.
Iv been told i must pay £80,000 to repair a building i dont own. I own 35% of a tiny flat, i only own the inside of the flat i paid £41,000 for my share An i must pay to repair the landlords poorly built building!!! Please help!!!!!!! #EndOurCladdingScandal
Sue the builders and don't give em permits till they fix it.
They were up to regulation when built. Regulators work with government bodies to decide if something is safe or not, they decided to use cheap cladding even though it was flammable in order to save the government money on building new homes. The government and the regulators are corrupt as hell, they need to be sued, they need to pay for everything and the people responsible, who made the decision to pass these fire hazards as 'safe', need to go to jail.
We've been told it might be £140,000 per flat for the leaseholders in our building. I'm actually jealous of the people with only £15,000 of unplanned costs.
The government should responsible for this, they set the regulations and they changed the regulation which caused this issue.
Building industry made huge profits using unsafe materials but walk away from the disaster
It doesn’t cost millions to get a screwdriver and remove panels from the side of a building. Come on...
Its not the cladding that flammable its the air gap behind it that intensify the heat of a building fire it acts like a one way system for flames and that's up
Disgusting the cladding people who misled about the flammability should pay! Barb
They built it, it’s their responsibility. Simple.
injustice from the goverment
Yet Kingspans share price is unaffected.
I have no business with any of these people so why should I pay for it?
Typical Governmental inaction while these flat owners lives are at risk shameful
If these are tenants why do they have to pay the cost? Surely its down to the building landlords, after all they are still or already have drawn the rents from these people. Lets face it, if these tenants move out, they won't be re renting cause no one will want to live there.
They are leasholders
@@Spartan969 Thank you for your explanation.
Surely in this day and age this cladding could be impregnated or coated to meet with the new regulations rather than replacing it?
Again, who pays for it?
No, the fast way is simply to remove it, because coating the old cladding means that it has to be tested and then authorized, that is a very long process indeed .
Fire hazard is a very serious matter.
Government should pay
It is time to pay more for fire safety
Buy land and build your own house
ATLbench Ideally, yes, but not much help to these people who are stuck.
They couldn’t even sort out school meals this is hardly at the top of there list of things to fuck up
Who's to blame? The architect?
Government should intervene for sure
And do what?
@@Locutus and pay up. There the ones at the end of the day who gave legislation for the material to be used when it shouldnt have. its not rocket science
@@BrokenToyAnimations So taxpayers should now pay for home improvements.
Gareth H yes
@@BrokenToyAnimations They didn't. The cladding was an industry standard. They approved and designed it.
All flats should be safe if not rebuild it and pay the flat owners back.
I think the very last thing on any owners mind would be worrying about rebuilding the block of flats if the cladding caught fire so common sense needs to come in to play here
A good example of well meaning gone wrong. Insulate to save heating costs! Good idea.
Let's cut corners and do a remedial job. Bad idea.
The regulator allowed cheap flammable insulation. The material permitted is the problem
The cladding was a requirement of The EU under their Energy Efficiency Directive, which was put in place in order to comply with The United Nations Paris Accord. It's no coincidence that this problem is everywhere in uk and that cladding was used on the outside, and no it wasn't to give it a nicer appearance.
Can you link that EU directive please? It would be interesting to read the details.
@@Ian_Carolan YES me too
Link please. Otherwise troll.
What’s a cladding?
Hmmmm free market capitalism👍
Actually this is down to regulations, so this is the opposite of capitalism and free markets. Energy Efficiency Regulations placed on all building passed by The EU to comply with The UN Paris Accord to have zero carbon emissions by 2050. It was originally called agenda 21, now it's called Agenda 30
How the fuck is this still an issue, disgusting!
I knew this was going to be a problem with them big blocks ...
Responsibility.... Every one searching
They better hurry up.
This is appalling..40 bill to ukr when sh1t like this needs sorting on your own door step
The UK has sadly become a come-one-come-all magnet attracting those with a developed sense of entitlement and an underdeveloped sense of gratitude.
They got no money for housing bu they got plenty for Gangstalking
0:42 'I now have to eat pasta.'
Life is for rent its all about the money people before profit
maybe the bbc should have covered the banking angle. if you own a condo wouldn't a bank lend you money against it so you can pay these unforeseen bills?
So u dig urself even deeper in the debt hole, is that your suggestion?! 🤦🏻♂️
@@jayrusty2012 exactly.
Insurace Industry should pay taxes like the gambling Industry....I bet it will burn down they bet it wont, who will win the bet?
I have only one question- why people don't wear masks properly?
🤣🤣🤣
Government keep allowing building them,demolishing strong much better ones,just to make a profit putting as much people as possible on a piece ol land🙈
Go eco-friendly and save lives.
Flammable building material. Yes good choice now lets burn some shit down
Huh... This is sounding familiar...
YES ! very ! thats the 90's in Romania ...those kind of bills that makes you think '' it must be a mistake'' and then you just pay it :D I sold my house for one of these in the 90's and brought another worser
cave man comes in 2020: plays with fire
also cave man: accidently throws it on the building
End lockdown.
If you start behaving the lockdown will not be needed.
@@10secondsrule Who says I'm not behaving. What, must everyone who follows lockdown also simultaneously love the idea if it?
#Ashamed2Bbritish
me to 😭👇🏾
@bluntay hey genius, no one is English. English is a Language. Are you a Language?
I'm ashamed you're British too...
@@WavScorn259 i said British , not English u idiot😂😂😂😂😂
@bluntay I've never left the country, not even for a holiday, believe me, if i could leave, I'd never come back
Timber frame housing is popular, and much loved for its speed, and accuracy, should these people be afraid too...?? get a grip.
What are you talking about?
@@louispugsleybirch8212 At one time in this country it was thought that living next to a sub-station would give you cancer, and the houses were worthless, a few years go by, and hey presto! no problem...
U think everything is turning to shit this Yr.. Wait till next Yr..
Still avoiding the US election updates BBC? Not doing so well are you 😂
What?
th-cam.com/video/o2-lXIbDtZM/w-d-xo.html
bbc paint building with fire proof paint
Didn't that fire happened almost a century ago? Why bother mention this flammable cladding again, when Bojo couldn't even handle the stupid virus that he himself got hooked on ventilator for?
Remember labour would have definitly paid to remove the claddings. Elections have consequences.
If my people who are called by my name humble themselves and pray, AND TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS, I will hear from heaven, will forgive their sins, and will heal their land.
And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
This, then, is how you should pray:
Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,
your kingdom come,
your will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us today our daily bread.
And forgive us our debts,
as we also have forgiven our debtors.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from the evil one.
For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins.
"Matthew 5-7 NIV Bible Gateway", we can use google search.
These are the teachings,
The Righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ our God.
REPENT, and start doing what is right.
If you abide my teachings, you are really my disciples; then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
A time is coming and has now come, that the true worshipers will worship the Father in Spirit and Truth. God is Spirit, so his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and Truth; they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks.
In the New Heaven and New Earth,
only Righteousness dwells.
May the Spirit of our Lord Jesus Christ our God be with you all.
Use this hash tag in Facebook
#RescuePh
Beggars can't be choosers
yes we can!
🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂
Who listen to study english like me😁
boomer
...
Lool I'm enjoying this 😂
im not :( thats exactly WHY i have property instead of appartment....cause those people DIDNT chosed their materials. its a nauseating feeling being told in WHAT to live. Let alone forced to pay for remediation. And that remediation is AGAIN not for you to chose wich materials!
I used to live there, it’s in
SE28 0GG, such a relief that I have left. It’s a beautiful place though.
Probably not best to give out their address no?
@@LivingAsTasha
I think it’s fine, It’s on TV already, Anyone can see those big towers in south London.
Sark, uh? 🙋