I don't really know how the planeswalker themed cards rotating out would really change the soupy nature of this format so far. I can't not draft a 4 color deck
Caw caw! Nice job. I think I would have played the at least one copy of the celestial archon just to have more to do in the middle game, but great job.
@@LordsofLimited Yeah, idk, Foundations felt very inconsistent with power levels. A small selection of cards were impactful. Resulting in repetitive plays, monotonous decks with a bunch of filler crap. Games were much about: "Will I draw my good cards or not?"
@@LordsofLimitedyou're right, I could have sworn I'd heard that before but I just looked at my logs and there's definitely packs with a gate plus gateway plaza, my bad :P
Confused why you think archangel of thune is one of the best cards in the set but celestial archon is clunky. Without other lifegain, they're both sort of baneslayer angels - great if you untap but still susceptible to removal. I guess you only need archangel to survive one turn with an ok board, but they dont seem that different to me in a typical UW deck
26:55 Ethan shouts "LMAO" amazing 😂❤ takes me back to my poker days when I used to shout "LOL" at all the donkeys 😂
I don't really know how the planeswalker themed cards rotating out would really change the soupy nature of this format so far. I can't not draft a 4 color deck
@@SupahGeck yeah maybe it won’t, might be a long 6 weeks…
Caw caw! Great deck. I look forward to drafting this.
Caw caw! Nice job. I think I would have played the at least one copy of the celestial archon just to have more to do in the middle game, but great job.
@@hallorette5059 yeah maybe that cards slightly better than I gave it credit for
Haven't played much, but I already know for certain that I like this format a lot more than Foundations. Is that just me? or...
I haven’t played much of either, but I definitely find this more entertaining to watch than foundations
@@Fanga1337 yeah masters set vs core set is not close for me
@@LordsofLimited Yeah, idk, Foundations felt very inconsistent with power levels. A small selection of cards were impactful. Resulting in repetitive plays, monotonous decks with a bunch of filler crap. Games were much about: "Will I draw my good cards or not?"
I actually think foundations is a great core set but yeah probs won't be drafting it much now P masters is here.
Gateway Plaza does indeed take the gate slot.
but how is there gateway plaza and a gate in the same pack sometimes?
@@LordsofLimitedyou're right, I could have sworn I'd heard that before but I just looked at my logs and there's definitely packs with a gate plus gateway plaza, my bad :P
I think zulaport cutthroat is for rakdos decks. I've had wild success with it alongside the thopter makers and pump dwarves
@@brianjones7943 still just seems so tough to play a small synergistic body in this format
I have mixed feelings for UW fliers. It looks unbeatable when ahead, but struggles big time when behind. Great vid demonstrating it’s power.
@@patrickgonzales7825 yeah, feels like it’s maybe even more aggressive than RW in that sense
Ca-caw flying birds
@@lucas_zazi thanks!
Ca-caw!!
@@lewistyler9084 thanks!
Ca-caw!
@@ScottPfeffer thanks!
This was an awesome Boros deck that you just didn't want to draft.
@@Methylimidazol yeah I definitely wanted to try UW if possible
Confused why you think archangel of thune is one of the best cards in the set but celestial archon is clunky. Without other lifegain, they're both sort of baneslayer angels - great if you untap but still susceptible to removal. I guess you only need archangel to survive one turn with an ok board, but they dont seem that different to me in a typical UW deck
the 4-power lifelink is a huge swing in life, can easily buy you 1-2 turns
@@morgancarlton4544 yeah I think you’re right, probably need to lower archangel in my estimation a bit
Cuh caw
@@martinprybylski2392 thanks!
To the skies
Ca-caw
caw caw
@@drewcarter7887 thanks!
Caw caw
@@stevenwilmes2572 thanks!