QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: - When does it come out? It doesn't. It has been recalled by LEGO shortly before the release date, that's why a limited number of units made it to the market. - Where can I buy it? eBay is a good place to start searching. Be prepared to pay A LOT. - Can you sell it to me? No, thank you. - Why do you review a set we can't buy? Because you can buy it, and because it's so rare and expensive, it's all the more reason to have a thorough review available. Also, some people still want to see what they can't have. You don't have to watch it if you don't. - How can I go about building my copy of this set? See links in the video description. - Why did you include a speed build when you've just published a speed build 2 days earlier? Because the earlier speed build is half as fast, and because a lot of people have missed it and expect to see a speed build in this video. You can use video chapters to skip it. - Does it fly? If you throw it really hard or strap it to a plane, sure.
Is the 'We just remembered that we don't do military stuff!' thing just an excuse to recall the product because they would have been torn to shreds for the functional / technical issues?
This is the first set in a while that I'd been super eager for, even with the gearbox issue, given people had already come up with a fix. It's gutting that they've recalled it, if it had been in marines camo with a doorgun installed I could MAYBE understand some people objecting but this is just blindingly stupid, especially considering I have the Lego Sopwith Camel on my desk right now, complete with Vickers machine guns
@@randomnickify if they just produced weapons that’d be a problem but they don’t. Even if the v22 hasn’t been used for rescue, Bell make a lot of the emergency vehicles in use globally. Air ambulances where i live are manufactured by the Bell aircraft corp.
randomnickify Bell-Textron Helicopters and Boeing aren’t exclusively military-based companies, they are also in the market for civilian or commercial usage to a large extent.
1. Thanks for adressing the gearbox issue! 2. The gearbox issue seems more like a reason LEGO cancelled the set so late as opposed to the military policy
I don't think so. LEGO is never afraid to release a flawed product, namely one with terrible gearbox. The GT3RS has huge flaws on the gearbox. The gear change is 1->3->2->4. While LEGO "claims" the wrong order is for a smoother operation of the gearbox, it can be fixed with switching 2 gears, which also leads to a smoother gearbox. So I don't see why they wouldn't do it this time and have to find a excuse t like this.
@@jkliao6486 wrong numbers are not the same as "oh its a new Week, Im gonna replace-order a free new gear from Lego". If 30 minutes are enough to destroy the gear, then Lego would be killed with free replacement-orders or even law suites from creative people.
@@radeberger1169 Really? you consider ordering 3 extra gears a lot of effort and you called yourself creative people? As long as there exists a solution to the problem from the community, it's not problem. Let alone a solution as simple as ordering 6 more gears. As for the law suit, as long as you are not tilting while rotating the blade, it's not gonna damage the gears. As far as I know, LEGO NEVER advertised this product to be able to perform 4 functions at the same time, do they? So if some creative people damaged the gear, it is their fault for false operation. Yes, this is a silly mistake from LEGO. But it is far from devastating to prevent them from releasing the set.
Jiankan Liao why so aggressive? The majority of buyers (indirectly) are still children. They play with the sets. The geras would break. When was the last time a lego set broke within 30 minutes? I cannot recall, but please give me examples. A 1-3-2-4 is not damaging any parts.
2:06 - literally could have brought a house with the amount that set just devalued lol. We all really appreciate your reviews,and Brickdepot for acquiring this set for you.
I love your videos and I always have. One piece of constructive criticism though: the new neon text borders for the titles don't work very well - in fact, it makes it harder to see. I get the idea, but if there's a way to tone down the brightness, that would be better. 👍
@@Unbrickme me too, i have a large collection of models of various types that has taken over my room. Even the kit built models that have no functions I like just having around to look at
DrivingUK I’d imagined so too. The initial controversy between the German group trying to call of it due to some military looks seems to be the start of it all but Lego wouldn’t give in that easily.
@@k_e_n_n_y_mccormick still doesn't change the fact fiction or not there military vehicles. Plus lots of military things have come into civilian life like GPS it was originally designed by the military and now it's in everyone's phone. The V22 has lots of potential in civilian life as LEGO depicted a rescue vehicle it can fly long distances like a plane meaning it can search vast areas much more than what a helicopter can do but still come to a hover to effect a rescue just like a helicopter.
In the reconstruction guide, Problem 1: Gear grinding/chewing. To fix, add 3 8z gears and bracing. Credit goes to Huw from Brickset. I looked at the PDF file, but when do I follow the steps? I.e., from which original step I switch to the fix, and where/which step to follow after the fixed PDF? Problem 2 is much clearer in that aspect. Thanks!
Great review as always. I was personally looking forward to this set and was disappointed about the cancellation. The gearbox issue is a big let down for me as I like Technic for the functions and I build scale model kits as well so I am not overly fussed about looks. I can't see how on earth that gear issue did not come up during the design phase though. Something about the whole thing just feels off because it just seems like no one in Lego actually thought about this set. That being said because I can't get one I am saving up my money to get the 42100 set since it has much greater functionality and I will probably try and motorise the Hasegawa V-22 osprey and build that for display purposes
@@Unbrickme yeah, the fix is very simple. I struggle to get my actual thoughts into words a lot because of a condition that I have so I am sorry about that. I think I mean that it is a let down that the issue is there in the first place, I am more than happy to make a fix if I got it at RRP but I am not happy to buy it at any more than that especially considering the fault. I am very much looking forward to trying to motorise a 1/72 scale plastic model kit of the V22 though with some spare brushed drone motors that I have. Sorry if none of that made sense
Well, the Powered Hub Simple Hub could be motorized by connecting a geared mechanism to the axle holes in each switch. That means you could have one motor acting as a servo to turn motors connected to the Simple Hub on and off. I can see some value in that.
Honestly I was really looking forward to getting this set, the orange and grey colours are perfect for me, and i was very interested in its functionality. I am so disappointed now :( Lego is just teasing us 😂
@@standardheat-fs8159 Yeah sure "idiots" because they said that its not great that LEGO wants to release a miliatary sets. What is wrong with you? 🤦♂️
@@Larry98 Lego make tons of military sets and they don't adhere to their "no military sets" rule at all. Even one which isn't a set: the Colt revolver mold in the Lone Ranger sets. A gun that killed thousands. Other examples: The nazi aeroplane in the Indiana Jones sets. The 2 Sopwith Camel sets. The Red Baron set. Some technic helicopters (just in a paint scheme that they "flew" under the radar of stupid protesting hippies). Lots of rescue and fire sets in the Lego city line are based on military vehicles. Apparently a 3 in 1 set that was a mix of 2 different modern military fighter jets. This set is a rescue set and Lego should release it again with an improved gearbox. And if you think this set (which contains no guns or violent objects of any kind. Unlike the entire Lego Star Wars and Ninjago lines) is military then you're just as stupid as the hippies that protested a fecking toy aeroplane being released. Go somewhere else that doesn't bother aviation and Lego enthusiasts.
This was like the first technic set I really ever wanted and I started saving up for it when I heard it was going to be released and then Lego had to go wipe it from shelves. Thanks Lego!
It seems from reviews that the issue is not so subtle at all. How would this get past designers and or quality control? Seems like the issue happens only after a few minutes of use. Got to say it's to bad it got cancelled. Admittedly it wasn't on my purchase list but after seeing reviews it looks like a cool build with some nice functions.
At 1:36, you can spot a mistake in the second colom second row, 23.86 kilos lift capacity. Same with the fuel capacity on row two, where it says 7.66 liters.
Technic panel tapering thin 19x3x1 with 3L liftarm thick. Color: light bluish grey. Quantity: 1 That's a remarkably dark "light bluish grey", and I'm thinking having only one blade between the two engines would make for some uneven flying. ;-)
@@searme The one with two pinholes and one cross hole (part no. 4211779) that pulls the elevator down and also the beam pulling the above mentioned part
It's good and bad that LEGO recalled the LEGO Technic 42113 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey set. The good thing is that it got recalled because of the gears. The LEGO Technic 42113 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey damages gears because of some moving parts. The bad thing is that this set looks super cool and highly detailed (which hyped up LEGO Technic fans) only for it to be cancelled by LEGO.
I feel that what happened was that with the Boeing crap going on, they were going to fight to keep the set up, then after they realized there was a big problem with the gearbox, they gave up, as it wasnt worth it.
There are rumors of Boeing/Bell building a civilian version of the V-22. It could be that the set gets updated then and released with minor visual changes. Or they are just gonna make some changes themselves to make it not look like a V-22 and just release it as a non-licensed set. My guess is that Chinese Rival Companies will sieze this opportunity and release the set themselves, as it basically is a golden opportunity.
Great that you could get hold of one and build it. Thanks for doing such a good review! Do you think there is any chance of Lego reversing their decision, perhaps if enough AFOLs petitioned them? It seems mad to get this far then cancel the model. I know people are concerned about militarising Lego or it being used for violence, but look at the Star Wars range, the movie tie-ins to Marvel, the Lego movies and even Lego castles and knights sets from decades ago! The V-22 is hardly a weapon of mass destruction and many Bell and Boeing products (probably the majority) are used for peaceable and even humanitarian purposes. Bad decision by Lego in my view.
I know right? LEGO literally made sets with nazis in it (indiana jones). Cancelling the V-22 this late is just madness. My guess it that it's gonna be re-released with some design modifications, possibly minor color changes and without the licence at the start of 2021. If they don't re-release it, it's their loss and me who keeps his 140€.
A mix of 42025 and 42052 without b model. I already have these 2 sets and also 9396 that is a great set. In 2020 the only technic set I really like is lamborghini. And ducati panigale but only because I love sportbike
My name is pranav. I am in class 7 i live in bangalore, india. I like doing lego and I like seeing your channel, most like it when you show your pet hamster .the bell boeing v22 osprey 42113s , multi directional gearbox flaw is not because of the linear clutch gear the 8 tooth gears which transfer power from the motor to the upper section are stressed when the tilting mechanism reaches its end point. the clutch gear slips that slip is not enough to protect the 8t gears which are stressed from the load there are many ways to fix this. one is to stop the motor before the engine tilting function reaches its end point. another is to add black 12t small gears which can handle more load and are not stressed if the clutch gear slips when the tilting function reaches its end point. last is to add one more motor to control upper functions since the l motor included can be stressed at times. if this was not cancelled 130 usd is very good as this gets you 1636 parts a powered up battery box a c+ l motor a multi directional gearbox
Did lego issue a statement on this thing getting canceled? Why did they pull it from the shelves? Seems like the gear mechanism malfunction might be a big reason why, if not that, then what was it? Good review, but kinda sucks that we can't get it. And that also probably means the recolors aren't going to be easy to get either. :(
I really can’t believe it got all the way to production before they suddenly realised it was a “military aircraft” and that major fault with the gearbox. They need to either give up on the idea of no military sets (this could open up a massive range of rescue vehicles) and employ a new research team.
Anyone make a decent representation yet w/ existing parts (different color scheme perhaps?) & freezing the parts list & slowing down the speed build? Are the instructions available anywhere?
I don't know if lego explicitly said they retired the set because of the "controversy" but i really hope it's because of the flaw in the gearbox and that they'll release the set when it's corrected
I've already signed the petition that Lego should just release this set. I get that's the prototype is currently only used by the military, but that is not its fault. I'll probably try to build it from the now provided instructions. The QA issues are weird though. And given both the landing gear and rotor issue, it should have come with a stand. I like the new title screens, but not the animation effects on them. It looks a bit cheap, and it makes them hard to read.
![LEGO 42113 Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey SPEED BUILD & PARTS LIST [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OFsbBtpDC14/mqdefault.jpg)
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS:
- When does it come out?
It doesn't. It has been recalled by LEGO shortly before the release date, that's why a limited number of units made it to the market.
- Where can I buy it?
eBay is a good place to start searching. Be prepared to pay A LOT.
- Can you sell it to me?
No, thank you.
- Why do you review a set we can't buy?
Because you can buy it, and because it's so rare and expensive, it's all the more reason to have a thorough review available. Also, some people still want to see what they can't have. You don't have to watch it if you don't.
- How can I go about building my copy of this set?
See links in the video description.
- Why did you include a speed build when you've just published a speed build 2 days earlier?
Because the earlier speed build is half as fast, and because a lot of people have missed it and expect to see a speed build in this video. You can use video chapters to skip it.
- Does it fly?
If you throw it really hard or strap it to a plane, sure.
Love the "does it fly" q&a
I threw mine and it flew, but after that it made a big boom
I don't know what is funnier, the fact that you even put "Does it fly?" in the Q&A, or the fact that you even answered it 😂
Is the 'We just remembered that we don't do military stuff!' thing just an excuse to recall the product because they would have been torn to shreds for the functional / technical issues?
@DraftKing 5325 Believe it or not, I was already asked if it flies.
Thanks for the shout-out. I'm glad the fix worked for you too.
16:37 The horns are a nice touch.
Good eyes! Cool indeed 🤘
I saw some reflections, but didn't really look into it~
Until I came across this comment~ XD
Helped escaping 69 likes
This is the first set in a while that I'd been super eager for, even with the gearbox issue, given people had already come up with a fix.
It's gutting that they've recalled it, if it had been in marines camo with a doorgun installed I could MAYBE understand some people objecting but this is just blindingly stupid, especially considering I have the Lego Sopwith Camel on my desk right now, complete with Vickers machine guns
Same, I agree with you totally. I even have the Sopwith Camel too. Although mine's in a cabinet
Its licensed meaning by buying it you are giving few dollars to the active weapons producer.
@@randomnickify if they just produced weapons that’d be a problem but they don’t. Even if the v22 hasn’t been used for rescue, Bell make a lot of the emergency vehicles in use globally. Air ambulances where i live are manufactured by the Bell aircraft corp.
randomnickify Bell-Textron Helicopters and Boeing aren’t exclusively military-based companies, they are also in the market for civilian or commercial usage to a large extent.
I really like this set, but the gearbox is just terrible. How did they not find out earlier that it literally destroys gears?
They didn't find the suspension of Chiron didn't work either. :)
@@sambrown0 🤣🤣yes, that was pretty sad..
Sam Brown yeah, that’s true, but I feel like this is worse
They were just making sure to keep it realistic with the real version!
Also remember how the clutch gears made the bucket wheel excavator just awful to use?
1. Thanks for adressing the gearbox issue!
2. The gearbox issue seems more like a reason LEGO cancelled the set so late as opposed to the military policy
yeah i think they couldnt figure how to fix it so they scraped the whole idea
I don't think so. LEGO is never afraid to release a flawed product, namely one with terrible gearbox. The GT3RS has huge flaws on the gearbox. The gear change is 1->3->2->4. While LEGO "claims" the wrong order is for a smoother operation of the gearbox, it can be fixed with switching 2 gears, which also leads to a smoother gearbox. So I don't see why they wouldn't do it this time and have to find a excuse t like this.
@@jkliao6486 wrong numbers are not the same as "oh its a new Week, Im gonna replace-order a free new gear from Lego". If 30 minutes are enough to destroy the gear, then Lego would be killed with free replacement-orders or even law suites from creative people.
@@radeberger1169 Really? you consider ordering 3 extra gears a lot of effort and you called yourself creative people? As long as there exists a solution to the problem from the community, it's not problem. Let alone a solution as simple as ordering 6 more gears. As for the law suit, as long as you are not tilting while rotating the blade, it's not gonna damage the gears. As far as I know, LEGO NEVER advertised this product to be able to perform 4 functions at the same time, do they? So if some creative people damaged the gear, it is their fault for false operation. Yes, this is a silly mistake from LEGO. But it is far from devastating to prevent them from releasing the set.
Jiankan Liao why so aggressive? The majority of buyers (indirectly) are still children. They play with the sets. The geras would break. When was the last time a lego set broke within 30 minutes? I cannot recall, but please give me examples. A 1-3-2-4 is not damaging any parts.
Released: 2020... well yes but actually no.
Somewhat consistent with the whole 2020 vibe...
[Announced but not] released: 2020
I legitimately haven't seen a Lego vid in a while. This brought back memories even if it's just a simple review : )
Same
@@peterzadrgal same same
I love your new intro sariel! This set is really great! I love the new title effects like at 26:42
2:06 - literally could have brought a house with the amount that set just devalued lol. We all really appreciate your reviews,and Brickdepot for acquiring this set for you.
Not a house but definitely a used car
@@Unbrickme Yes a house, someone near me has one on sale for over £100,000, and people are bidding on it.
Released: 2020
Good one, Sariel.
If they had made a B model they could have released the set just by changing the box and instructions. Maybe that will teach them.
missed opportunity for a Chinook B-model
@@solderball8984 The blades would probably be too short for that...
I love your videos and I always have. One piece of constructive criticism though: the new neon text borders for the titles don't work very well - in fact, it makes it harder to see. I get the idea, but if there's a way to tone down the brightness, that would be better. 👍
If I were you, I wouldnt dismantle this set after review and keep it as a shelf queen, but at the end, its yours!
I never dismantle any of my lego technic sets. I like to have a museum
@@Unbrickme me too, i have a large collection of models of various types that has taken over my room. Even the kit built models that have no functions I like just having around to look at
I think the fact that this set chewed up gears is the real reason Lego have withdrawn it.
DrivingUK I’d imagined so too. The initial controversy between the German group trying to call of it due to some military looks seems to be the start of it all but Lego wouldn’t give in that easily.
@@chair5728 While technically the V-22 osprey is a military vehicle, I get your point.
so its a military vehicle so is the Star-wars Republic gunship and AT-TE.
@@phalanx3803 wait are you comparing star wars to real life war?
@@k_e_n_n_y_mccormick still doesn't change the fact fiction or not there military vehicles. Plus lots of military things have come into civilian life like GPS it was originally designed by the military and now it's in everyone's phone. The V22 has lots of potential in civilian life as LEGO depicted a rescue vehicle it can fly long distances like a plane meaning it can search vast areas much more than what a helicopter can do but still come to a hover to effect a rescue just like a helicopter.
In the reconstruction guide,
Problem 1: Gear grinding/chewing. To fix, add 3 8z gears and bracing. Credit goes to Huw from Brickset.
I looked at the PDF file, but when do I follow the steps? I.e., from which original step I switch to the fix, and where/which step to follow after the fixed PDF?
Problem 2 is much clearer in that aspect.
Thanks!
Costs an arm and a leg you say? rubbish. I could get at least 2 of these for a single kidney.
I'm joking just in case anyone is really stupid
The Lime Sheep hey want to by my kidney I have 4
I was hoping someone would put up a scan of the instructions. Thanks a ton man!
Maybe... googling often leads to a valuable outcome ; )
So happy u were able to fix the problem!
thank u very much!
Sariel is the best lego reviewer channel, that he can get the v-22 osprey!
I like how the new control hub is nicknamed "dumb battery box". Do you see any use for it in future sets?
Finally for this set we dont need a smartphone ... and it has cancelled ... xd
Great review as always. I was personally looking forward to this set and was disappointed about the cancellation. The gearbox issue is a big let down for me as I like Technic for the functions and I build scale model kits as well so I am not overly fussed about looks. I can't see how on earth that gear issue did not come up during the design phase though. Something about the whole thing just feels off because it just seems like no one in Lego actually thought about this set.
That being said because I can't get one I am saving up my money to get the 42100 set since it has much greater functionality and I will probably try and motorise the Hasegawa V-22 osprey and build that for display purposes
Look, the gearbox issue has an incredibly simple fix. Just like how most technic fans replace the useless clutch gear with a regular gear
@@Unbrickme yeah, the fix is very simple. I struggle to get my actual thoughts into words a lot because of a condition that I have so I am sorry about that. I think I mean that it is a let down that the issue is there in the first place, I am more than happy to make a fix if I got it at RRP but I am not happy to buy it at any more than that especially considering the fault. I am very much looking forward to trying to motorise a 1/72 scale plastic model kit of the V22 though with some spare brushed drone motors that I have. Sorry if none of that made sense
Well, the Powered Hub Simple Hub could be motorized by connecting a geared mechanism to the axle holes in each switch. That means you could have one motor acting as a servo to turn motors connected to the Simple Hub on and off. I can see some value in that.
I was really looking forward to this set
Honestly I was really looking forward to getting this set, the orange and grey colours are perfect for me, and i was very interested in its functionality. I am so disappointed now :( Lego is just teasing us 😂
DriftKing 5325 It’s not Legos fault, it’s idiots protesting war machines like this Osprey
@@standardheat-fs8159 Yeah sure "idiots" because they said that its not great that LEGO wants to release a miliatary sets.
What is wrong with you? 🤦♂️
@@Larry98 thing is tho LEGO is not instigating violence of any kind. It's an engineering marvel
@@amirpenkar947 Its a military set which is against LEGOs own rules.
@@Larry98 Lego make tons of military sets and they don't adhere to their "no military sets" rule at all. Even one which isn't a set: the Colt revolver mold in the Lone Ranger sets. A gun that killed thousands.
Other examples:
The nazi aeroplane in the Indiana Jones sets. The 2 Sopwith Camel sets. The Red Baron set. Some technic helicopters (just in a paint scheme that they "flew" under the radar of stupid protesting hippies).
Lots of rescue and fire sets in the Lego city line are based on military vehicles.
Apparently a 3 in 1 set that was a mix of 2 different modern military fighter jets.
This set is a rescue set and Lego should release it again with an improved gearbox.
And if you think this set (which contains no guns or violent objects of any kind. Unlike the entire Lego Star Wars and Ninjago lines) is military then you're just as stupid as the hippies that protested a fecking toy aeroplane being released. Go somewhere else that doesn't bother aviation and Lego enthusiasts.
I can watch that tilting engine gondolas for hours... "Osprey" is masterpiece of aviation enginering
This was like the first technic set I really ever wanted and I started saving up for it when I heard it was going to be released and then Lego had to go wipe it from shelves. Thanks Lego!
I love how people are saying ow a osprey is a military plane while there have been several other models like this in the creator and city themes
But they weren't licensed by Boeing, were they?
Nice video as always Sariel! It’s a shame that very few people were able to get this set. I would have definitely liked to purchase it
Thanks for referencing my thread! Sempai noticed me!!!
I saw a driving ring with gears on either side, though only one is labeled, what if I select the unlabeled gear?
Nothing, this gear is disabled. If it wasn't it would make the rotors spin downwards.
@@searme the v22 has the weirdest gearbox i have ever seen in a technic set
It seems from reviews that the issue is not so subtle at all. How would this get past designers and or quality control? Seems like the issue happens only after a few minutes of use.
Got to say it's to bad it got cancelled. Admittedly it wasn't on my purchase list but after seeing reviews it looks like a cool build with some nice functions.
At 1:36, you can spot a mistake in the second colom second row, 23.86 kilos lift capacity. Same with the fuel capacity on row two, where it says 7.66 liters.
Technic panel tapering thin 19x3x1 with 3L liftarm thick. Color: light bluish grey. Quantity: 1
That's a remarkably dark "light bluish grey", and I'm thinking having only one blade between the two engines would make for some uneven flying. ;-)
This set looks like a combination of the heavy lift copter and the fire plane (both Technik sets)
16:37 metal !!
Why there is no green navigation light on the tail? There is only red one. I used the spares to put the missing green one.
At 18:20 the liftarm seems a bit twisted. Is that how instructions tell you to build or is it just a human error?
Which one?
@@searme The one with two pinholes and one cross hole (part no. 4211779) that pulls the elevator down and also the beam pulling the above mentioned part
I'm not seeing it.
Hm, the new panel 19*3*1 is not in LBG colour and there are six(/) of them. Pawel, I hope you are wrong at 5:31
Can you please tell me the music used in this video? I really like the tunes.
Amazing work on the review.
It's good and bad that LEGO recalled the LEGO Technic 42113 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey set. The good thing is that it got recalled because of the gears. The LEGO Technic 42113 Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey damages gears because of some moving parts. The bad thing is that this set looks super cool and highly detailed (which hyped up LEGO Technic fans) only for it to be cancelled by LEGO.
Epic video
Could they produce it without any licenses? I remember they did a Creator set that was obviously a V22, but with no branding
Yeah, and I've heard that Boeing gave them some legal trouble about it.
5:31 Light bluish gray? Are you sure? 😁
Thank you for the review
Is there any actual space inside the aircraft? If you look inside at 15:50 how deep does the space go behind the ramp?
Pretty deep.
Thanks, it just was suspicious that the hamster didn't go in there at all :D
15:26 I think you missed one if the signal lights at the back. The green one is missing
No. This is exactly as shown in the instructions.
At 2:05 - "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced"
A great review, thank you for this, it is a shame that most of us will never have a chance to buy one.
Great video. Keep up the good work.
FIRE BABY, FIRE!
Ariel there is a typo at 26:45
ormorando there is a typo at Ariel.
A question Sariel, would it be possible to avoid the additional gears if we were to install the old clutch gear?
I think not.
I feel that what happened was that with the Boeing crap going on, they were going to fight to keep the set up, then after they realized there was a big problem with the gearbox, they gave up, as it wasnt worth it.
Giving it a 5 star value score seems questionable given that almost no one will be able to buy this for retail price.
Unrelated Question: Are hamster nails supposed to be that long?
Там внутри коробка передач, потрясающее решение по работе механизмов. Хотя и не без изъянов.
5:31 there is a little mistake
5:32 I was confused for a moment because I’m sure there are 6 of these and not 1 but I realized it’s probably a typo
They are also black and not pight grey
13 dislikes from lego employees
And German peace society hippies.
It's always make me smile when CUSTOMERS are making fix to a product xD
i can't believe it. finally there is a battery-box-sort-of-thing for the new motors, but its expensive af
well done dude!
I wonder if they will rerelease it? I know it’s been cancelled but just wondering
There are rumors of Boeing/Bell building a civilian version of the V-22. It could be that the set gets updated then and released with minor visual changes. Or they are just gonna make some changes themselves to make it not look like a V-22 and just release it as a non-licensed set.
My guess is that Chinese Rival Companies will sieze this opportunity and release the set themselves, as it basically is a golden opportunity.
does your also have a gearbox problem?
Great question, the answer is right there in the video.
Nice vid!thanks!
Pretty sure those rotor blades aren't light bluish grey. :)
Mulțumesc, cei din România :)
Don't forget that the pieces in new colors will not be released from this set too.
Great that you could get hold of one and build it. Thanks for doing such a good review! Do you think there is any chance of Lego reversing their decision, perhaps if enough AFOLs petitioned them? It seems mad to get this far then cancel the model. I know people are concerned about militarising Lego or it being used for violence, but look at the Star Wars range, the movie tie-ins to Marvel, the Lego movies and even Lego castles and knights sets from decades ago! The V-22 is hardly a weapon of mass destruction and many Bell and Boeing products (probably the majority) are used for peaceable and even humanitarian purposes. Bad decision by Lego in my view.
I know right? LEGO literally made sets with nazis in it (indiana jones). Cancelling the V-22 this late is just madness. My guess it that it's gonna be re-released with some design modifications, possibly minor color changes and without the licence at the start of 2021. If they don't re-release it, it's their loss and me who keeps his 140€.
Guess I'll have to to make do with set 31020
So unfortunate that most of us couldn't get this. It looks great
I’m never going to be able to afford this, but I suppose pretending your hands are mine will have to be a sufficient substitute. Nice video.
How’d u get this it’s been canceled?
Read 0:44
Happy to see that your patatoe pc (even though mine is worse) rendered it in time. I hope next month will be a bit more normal. Cheers!
Very nice vid mate. Where did you get the new parts and spare lights? Thanks
They came with the set.
@@searme i see. How about the gearbox fix where can we buy it and how much? Thanks
Bricklink.com
Sariel's Bricks & Pets thanks mate!
A mix of 42025 and 42052 without b model. I already have these 2 sets and also 9396 that is a great set. In 2020 the only technic set I really like is lamborghini. And ducati panigale but only because I love sportbike
My name is pranav. I am in class 7 i live in bangalore, india. I like doing lego and I like seeing your channel, most like it when you show your pet hamster .the bell boeing v22 osprey 42113s , multi directional gearbox flaw is not because of the linear clutch gear the 8 tooth gears which transfer power from the motor to the upper section are stressed when the tilting mechanism reaches its end point. the clutch gear slips that slip is not enough to protect the 8t gears which are stressed from the load there are many ways to fix this. one is to stop the motor before the engine tilting function reaches its end point. another is to add black 12t small gears which can handle more load and are not stressed if the clutch gear slips when the tilting function reaches its end point. last is to add one more motor to control upper functions since the l motor included can be stressed at times. if this was not cancelled 130 usd is very good as this gets you 1636 parts a powered up battery box a c+ l motor a multi directional gearbox
Which is the link to buy the parts?
bricklink.com
Did lego issue a statement on this thing getting canceled? Why did they pull it from the shelves? Seems like the gear mechanism malfunction might be a big reason why, if not that, then what was it?
Good review, but kinda sucks that we can't get it. And that also probably means the recolors aren't going to be easy to get either. :(
Yes, they did. Doesn't take much to find it.
value (is this set worth its price) : 5 stars
uhh... nop. no it's not. not if it costs way too much
Maybe he meant value if it wasn't recalled
@@موسى_7 Maybe but that wasn’t clear. He should have been more explicit given the circumstances.
great video, ilike thanks for sharing
I really can’t believe it got all the way to production before they suddenly realised it was a “military aircraft” and that major fault with the gearbox. They need to either give up on the idea of no military sets (this could open up a massive range of rescue vehicles) and employ a new research team.
Wait, thats why they Pulled this out??
@Lil doge Did you not see the official statement Sariel posted on Facebook?
Anyone make a decent representation yet w/ existing parts (different color scheme perhaps?) & freezing the parts list & slowing down the speed build? Are the instructions available anywhere?
Literally typing "lego 42113 instructions" into Google returns dozens of links. Try it.
I don't know if lego explicitly said they retired the set because of the "controversy" but i really hope it's because of the flaw in the gearbox and that they'll release the set when it's corrected
Yes, they explicitly said it, repeatedly, all over the Internet.
Sariel's Bricks & Pets Thanks, sorry i just didn't follow the story much before this video
I love the 42025, but wow it's not the best looking with it's stickers and white panels. This looks so much better. Too bad I can't get one. :(
They should do a Military version...
They didn’t release it literally because it’s an exclusive military aircraft.
Sir Maximus 😕Ah daaaang. Welp...it's MOC time!
I have a qestion for Mr Sariel:
What is your opinion about Polish edition of Lego Masters?
Considering that they kicked me out of it, I'd rather not comment.
@@searme fair enough😁
@@searme You got kicked out?? As in: forcefully removed, or as in: you got eliminated in the competition?
Udało się w Polsce kupić Ospreya? Wow. Ile ich jest w PL?
Nie.
why does it look like it has a control+hub down below?
Watch the video and you'll know.
@@searme now ik
Can’t wait to find instructions.
Look at this video's description, then.
Sariel's Bricks & Pets Awesome. Thanks.
I would give 0 star at the value. Scalpers just sky-rocketed the price of this set XD
I was expecting N/A for not applicable, since the set won't ever be available at retail prices.
Do you think the rumors about quality control causing the cancellation of the set are true?
I imagine if this was the case they would simply fix the set, not cancel it. This has happened before, e.g. with the Ideas Wall-E set.
@@searme This makes sense.
I've already signed the petition that Lego should just release this set. I get that's the prototype is currently only used by the military, but that is not its fault. I'll probably try to build it from the now provided instructions. The QA issues are weird though. And given both the landing gear and rotor issue, it should have come with a stand.
I like the new title screens, but not the animation effects on them. It looks a bit cheap, and it makes them hard to read.
That petition is way too late and it's going to achieve exactly nothing, sorry.
I want the Pohatucopter so bad.
Thank you for nice review! 5 gears and 3 pin bar just costed somebody millions...
About reverse engineering: anybody understand that pastebin file posted on the Eurobrick forum?
Haven't they already made an osprey before?
No.
@@searme well that was quite a simple answer.
What if LEGO released this again as just a VTOL plane without the osprey branding. Just have a Boeing Aeroplane set. Or no branding at all.
Why this set is cancelled?????
Perfect question to use Google: www.military.com/off-duty/2020/07/28/reason-lego-cancelled-its-v-22-osprey-set.html