Gregorius Giovanni most ppl (me) only think about the convenience, or how accurate it is. I never before now thought about how the technology could be used to potentially discriminate against me or target me. Then there are other ppl that feel this would only be a concern to terrorists and such but the speaker clearly indicated some opposing food for thought.
It's even more sad that it won't be listened to either. I'm afraid the development is impossible to stop. Because a large majority of people don't care/understand
Ben Franklin was smart that why put "essential" in that quote. Giving up non-essential liberty for safety is sometimes wise, and those who do not do might end up with neither liberty nor safety.
@@myothersoul1953 Not giving up non-essential liberty will never lead to a loss of liberty. It could lead to the loss of safety but at least you would have the ability to defend yourself in a hypothetical dangerous environment. Privacy rights are essential tho.
@@derrickg5612 Hypothetically many things could happen. That's why we should deal in reality and not some extreme imaginary slippery slope scenario. If the police were sometimes allowed to use face recognition doesn't mean they will put a camera outside of AA meetings to see who is attending. If they did people should start asking the police some hard questions and voting for different representatives.
@@myothersoul1953 You just posed a hypothetical scenario to me, but in that scenario, I could see police officials easily justifying cameras outside of AA meetings. We need to know where the alcoholics are... for your safety. Once a government attains a certain power it doesn't like to give it up. That's the reality of the nature of people in power.
@@derrickg5612 Just because the police could come us with a justification doesn't mean it would or should be accepted. They should need a warrant. We should not allow the state to put up cameras up without good cause. But we don't need to ban cameras to do that. We should not allow the police to track people without good cause. That's true whether they use credit cards, cell phones signals, face recognition software, face recognition brainware or any other technology. Banning face recognition software won't solve the bigger problem. Solve the bigger problem and face recognition software won't be a problem.
CHINA IS A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP, AMERICA IS A DEMOCRACY WHERE PEOPLE HAVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. SURVEILLANCE CAMS ARE SIMPLY A TOOL. ACCORDING TO YOUR FLAWED LOGIC WE SHOULD DO AWAY WITH PRISONS, POLICE, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SIMPLY BECAUSE COMMIE CHINA ALSO HAS THEM
Many people do. The current Democratic platform, of which millions agree with, want our country to mirror China in many ways. We are in grave danger, but no one seems to care.
Biometrics actually has 3 facets - 1. Surveillance, 2. Tracking/Monitoring and the 3rd according to the DoD is Targeting (with Military weapons) referred to as Biometric Targeting Recognition.
Like almost all TED talks, watch at 1.5x - 2x speed and you will hear the same info just as easily understood, without all the dramatic pauses to make the person look like they are making a deeper point than they actually made. Over a lifetime, this can save you many hours. Which I for one will use for strumming my gusset. Thank me later.
This is true however the pauses allow you to abosorb what the person is saying amd think about all of the important parts. Its important to stay captovating to keep the attention so the listener gets all of the information. Its a psychological thing and its just good public speaking. This is just me but I much rather the speaking to be dramatic as you put it than a bland reading of all the info. At that point I might as well just read the script that they provide myself
Adella Malbrough, AND I’m trying to fight the modern pressure to hurry, hurry, hurry. Slowing down to listen has been a good discipline for me. I gotta admit though, I do like to fast forward and hit 2 podcast in the space of one!
Okay... So the person giving the talk says the government won't work according to their own rules? I live in central Europe and here it very much works like that - the government wants to use information they have on someone, so they have to ask a judge to be allowed to do it. The success rate of such a petition is nearly 100 percent because the agencies involved know exactly in which cases they are allowed to use it.
How do curtains make me safe? If a burglar wanted to make sure that I wasn't home and I was then I'd be burgled or not if they knew, if they don't know then they might be deterred or not and something worse than a burglary could happen to me. All that I heard during this talk was a lot of fear mongering, and her "regulation and accountability" argument was completely skipped. Regulate it. Make them accountable. That works for me. She also conveniently forgot to mention the help that facial recognition could do, catching wanted fugitives and abducted children.
I would only worry with face surveillance when living in a country ruled by immoral abusive totalitarian regime. But I would feel more secure with it to deter criminality especially around my neighborhood. That’s why I install security camera at home to secure it and have something to look back to in case of a break in. Best to have it in a society where criminality is rampant.
there's a difference between you have it on your private property (with no connection to the internet, or at least not uploading to the government) and government have it everywhere. Sure, when the government turns totalitarian, it will install the cameras anyway, but the extremes aren't the only possibilities.
You are so concerned about the government's use of this tech, I'm more concerned about Blackwater and private "security" firms, which are actually mercenaries, and thugs who will employ these against people at things like the Standing Rock water protector occupations, with no oversight, they can plant false evidence at places you've been then give their "proof" to law enforcement.
I’ll never forget went fishing with a great uncle of mine who worked for and eventually retired from NASA he was on the original team that installed NORAD he said. (I’ve no reason to doubt him) One late night fishing like 10 years ago somehow or another we got on the topic and he said when they were installing the equipment, or whatever he did I forget, said they had retinal scanners to access doorways. That was in 50’s
Yeah the government, especially the CIA, fund places like MIT in order to get them to develop technology strictly for them. And then over time, they allow this technology to be sold to the public from private companies. An they are very deliberate about what and when they choose to release. They have very specific goals in mind for allowing this tech out there. For example, the Navy creates the deep web,or dark web, so they could communicate without being traced. But they realized anyone who accesses the network would know anyone else on there was military. So they released it to the public so they could remain anonymous, but also to encourage other clandestine groups to use the technology, giving them a false sense of security using a system that they created. The same is true of smart phones and social media. They don't create everything themselves, but they do boost the things they want to be popular, like Google. Take a look into Google's creator and who he has ties to and how he got off the ground. It isn't organic at all. Many of those people involved have ties to intelligence and Israel. And TH-cam is linked directly from the same people. And once those people are turned into billionaires, if some technology does manage to organically pop up, they just buy it and adapt it to their needs. It's pretty sickening really.
@@nah3375 9:31 If one murders a baby in taxpayer funded privacy butcher shop, or does govt assisted kidnapping for control or money, it's still a crime that should result in prison. No immunity for feminists. Judgment Day will come.
@Kade Crockford - I am currently working on a reverse surveillance app that will allow the surveilled to detect and identify the person that is surveilling and surveil him/her back. Unfortunately, it seems that the final stages of my project are going to cost more than I can afford.
Just because different people talk about problems we, as humanity should solve responsibly, doesn't mean we're all doomed. The world is not all butterflies and rainbows. We have important topics to discuss and ignoring that becomes part of the problem.
@@TheKeule33 I agree. And it is important to discuss them in a reasonable and level headed way. We should make every effort to avoid things like confirmation bias and bad reasoning. For example logical fallacies, the slippery slope fallacy. See if you can spot it in the video above. I think it is around the ten minute mark.
I agree with the need to resist facial recognition technology. It turns a community into a gulag where all of us held despite the idea that we are free.
Once after arriving at a hospital, after abusing and battering me with their technology, they forced me to point my hand towards a human trafficking sign and the nurse turned it around. She then closed the curtain and they made my clothes shrink to my body. I could hear a voice through voice to skull, they told me I wasn't allowed to move because I was entering into something I couldn't get out of. They said they'd kill me of I tried to "get out"...
AFTER I Got out of the hospital ,,Soon after A Scammer calls me telling me I have to pay tax on 16.600 + 29 cents and if I Don't pay the cops will come to my door in 30 + - HRS .. I had to call BS I don't have to pay any tax .. Yep You got it ?...
This topic is fascinating because it transcends the fundamental beliefs of republicans and democrats.. it is an an inherently nonpartisan issue, like “campaign finance reform” that has a logical and obvious conclusion, which is fundamentally acceptable regardless of party association. I think Kade’s argument is amazing and we should be acting across the country!!
Total misrepresentation of what happened to Talley. 'Two tipsters called Crime Stoppers to report that the robber, shown in the photos, was Talley. Police showed the photos to Talley’s ex-wife and she said it was him. Talley said his ex-wife had reason to lie, because they were involved in a bitter custody dispute. The lawsuit states that Det. Jeffrey Hart, in violation of proper identification procedures, pointed to Talley’s photograph while showing an array of photos to the teller at the second bank."
In our society, we must protect ourselves from the government, which is the reason I ALWAYS carry a personal weapon. I don't carry a personal weapon to protect my family & myself from "bad people", but rather, to protect my family and myself from the government...namely, the police. Here in Wichita, Kansas, the Wichita Police Department can now, LEGALLY, redirect HOME SECURITY CAMERAS if the police officer "feels unsafe being seen on a video monitor", while on a call...even at our private homes! Also, the Wichita Police Department has murdered an unarmed man WHO WAS STANDING INSIDE OF THE DOORWAY OF HIS HOME, and the cop (WICHITA POLICE OFFICER JUSTIN RAPP) got away with the murder of an innocent man, whose name was ANDREW FINCH.
It's already being implemented around the world! Thank God she gave this lecture to bring the topic more into the forefront, though. Social credit/conditioning is also much easier to pull off with this technology.
It is scary up to some point. To be honest, facial recognition should be implemented in the streets, at least in my country (Spain). I am one of those who say that has nothing to hide, but of course facial recognition shouldn't enter our private areas (houses, or even the technology we use should be private). Nevertheless, at public spaces facial recognition should be implemented to increase security. The example that you gave of how prisoners behave differently when they know that they are being recorded is a very good one to portrait, that maybe rapists, robbers, and other types of bad persons don't do what they do if they know that they are being recorded.
How about a transparent society? I am actually familiar with the technology. It can be fooled, for one thing. It can also be used by the bad guys. So are you seriously saying that the cops should not use this technology while bad guys unquestionably would?
A lot of people in the audience laugh and although I'm not judging too harshly, this is a very serious topic that has been spoken about for a while now.
I think the UK has more CCTV than any other country. This discussion has been in the public eye recently and basically very carefully regulations are required to ensure that data is not collected for any "face" which is not on a formalised suspect list and all data should be erased (or never recorded) apart from validated triggers.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 It isn't power seekers in this case, it is paranoid protectionism, endorsed by authoritarian judgemental self righteous folk. We all want a degree of protection, to prevent crime and catch criminals. The paranoia that AI is flawed is justified up to a point, but it should be a part of reasonable law enforcement. That's the balance, though, isn't it? Reasonable...
What's horribly un-funny is that if you have a porch pirate raid off with a package from your porch, and she's on camera, the cops won't pursue it further. (Such robbers must pretty much be caught in the act to be caught at all.) This technology doesn't work *for* us as much as is advertised.
I'm not sure what this woman does: she warns about privacy breeching or she advertises it. She truly thinks she does the first but who can stop that anyway? And would most of people prefer the "big dad watching you" scenario? Why? Since he is a guarantor of their safety! I would add: many countries like Russia are implementing this tech without asking their civilians. The countries which didn't do that would be more open for terrorism and other crimes. It is a challenge.
I once seen a map of police cameras of district 4 in Zürich, Switzerland. (That’s where the relight district is). There is literally not a single square meter that is not covered..
Don't willingly give up your privacy. Boycott companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, etc. Inform your friends and family about what's going on. The other commenter here said to write your Congressman. But Ralph Nader taught me that doesn't really work. What we have to do is band together. Find a group of about 1,000 or more people in your district and get them organized. Organize online, spread the word, get people informed. Then you start holding rallies in real life and recruit from there. You only need to start with about 25 people in order to grow to 1,000. Once you have the real physical numbers, then you go to your local Congressman's office and confront him there. Don't be hostile. Explain to him or her that these issues are extremely important to you, and if they are unwilling to do anything about it, then you will be forced to vote for someone who might actually listen. Record the interaction and upload it to social media. Use their own weapons against them. Get the word out. Writing letters is fine, but it rarely changes anything. Some intern is reading them and throwing most of them away, or sending a generic response letter with a signature which may or may not be basically rubber stamped on. But when 1,000 voters show up at the Congressman's office, that gets their attention. Remember that most of these people are whores. Yes, they love money, and that's why lobbyists have so much pull. But what're all of those campaign contributions for? To get votes. See, we have the power to cut out the middle man. We are the voters. We are the reason they raise all of that money, in hopes of persuading US. So when they see 1,000 people willing to show up and confront them, they assume there are many more who feel the same way who didn't show up. When they know they're being filmed, they're going to be very careful with what they say. And when they know you are coming back again next week, I can promise you that they're going to do their homework so they can have a better answer for you next time. This has always been Nader's strategy, and he's gotten more accomplished for the American citizen than any other private citizen in history, and arguably more than most politicians. From safety regulations for workers, seat belts in cars and the single most important thing he ever achieved, the freedom of information act or FOIA, and many more which are too numerous to mention. Nader's strategy just works. So if you're serious about wanting change, that's the best way I've ever seen it done. And I'm more than willing to help. I live in Louisville, Ky.
@Bearly Listening : I use DuckDuckGo with little to no problem as a search engine. It is our laziness and apathy that got us here in the first place. As far as cell phones go: 25 years ago things were generally much better, and in no small part due to the fact that very very few people even had cell phones.
I'm 100% positive my GPS is never on except when I choose. Admittedly there's a lot of menus/apps and settings you must go through in your phone and in Google system settings themselves multi tier no less😐 (takes me over an hour on a new device).. so I understand where yr coming from.
Only Idiots will trade their freedom for security. I appreciate you and your speech. More people should speak up about the government they are not what they seem to be..
I had cops come to my door because Facial Recognition notified police that someone with a random twitter account used one of my online pictures as their profile pic and made death threats to a school..
An excellent talk. Here in the UK, there is one closed circuit television camera for every 11 people. Automatic number plate recognition cameras submit 50 million checks per day. London's Metropolitan Police ('the MET') are trialling facial recognition software. Interactions with the police, including those involving no crime, are recorded in a central database ('the Police National Computer'). Mobile phone data can be collected without obtaining a warrant (PACE 2000). Britain has a centralised government, with weak local councils. The US has a freshly emboldened President, and the UK has a new Prime Minister who is also inclined to be an authoritarian. Look at China, and wonder if it's the future.
To comply with Real ID act must submit to FR technology. No domestic flight or federal building access etc without. The other option being a passport, which, again uses FR technology.
This is one of the first Tedx lectures I've enjoyed in a while! It's been a lot of jaded, identity politics, ideological, SJW, nonsense for quite a few of the these. But not so with this one, I enjoyed the topic and lecturer (although the info. is pretty scary)! Just think of this lecture when you sign up for Elon's neural link brain implant! ;)
Google wants to sell your facial information or other visual data. Then Bic will have pop-up ads for razors when it looks like you need to shave [without telling you that you are scruffy looking], Flintstones Vitamins will announce hang-over strength Gummies because the bags under your eyes are ALWAYS worse on Saturday and Sunday morning. And the pizza & beer special you ordered via delivery the night before confirms a lot... After a bit, clothing ads, tailored to how you look for each season start showing up. Funny how Ross always knows your color in the adverts! Just by some careful examination of trends over time, a persons life could be easy to read.
I will write legislation protecting our privacy from the overwhelming capacity of the government and larger corporations................... In other words, Google has the software for face surveillance and they use it.
On the plus side it would allow all crimes to be solved if it worked perfectly and perhaps prevent some. I agree that the problem is oversight which should be strict, restrictive, outside political influence, transparent and unforgiving of anybody that breaks the rules. Also rules should be in place that automatic face recognition cannot be used as the sole source of evidence in a criminal conviction because of false positives. However if the technology exists then it will be used.
You better go back and read those agreements with your phone Co. where you will find out that they can do what every they want with your non-private information, your private info scrubbed from your daily activity within a zip code, just a bunch of dots moving around meaning nothing to you and me but much to those who would like to sale you something. Learn the laws that concern the usage of the zip code and you will find out that the governments and commerce are required to used the zip code but you are not, so why do you use it because they told you so that it makes sending mail faster and easier, governments and commerce are considered entities, a person in the eyes of the law but not a natural person also recognized as a incompetent person and a deceased person all carrying rights within the law. So the person that uses the zip code is recognized by the government as a commercial entity residing within a zip code of many taxing districts that they are required to pay taxes to by law who are the true residents of your state. A commercial entity must apply for a business license with the state government that you own and becomes employed to your state to provide you with the refined goods created form your states resources that the government manages for you. Learn your states "without recourse" law located in commercial transactions codes and you might find out about well kept secrete.
The prison walls expanded is the best description for this that I've ever heard.
@Open Minded you're absolutely right
When we're in a prison without walls, there is zero escape, let alone to hope for it.
Yeah yeah it is like that cause it's trump the president.. if it was obama it would be ok.... lol
THIS A MAN??? Yes, it is important.
No to 100% surveillance of the 99% innocent.
100% innocent. Until proven.
It's sad something so obvious must be talked about...
Gregorius Giovanni most ppl (me) only think about the convenience, or how accurate it is. I never before now thought about how the technology could be used to potentially discriminate against me or target me. Then there are other ppl that feel this would only be a concern to terrorists and such but the speaker clearly indicated some opposing food for thought.
@@MiVidaBellisima Yeah, that's why it sad.
Wrong
It's even more sad that it won't be listened to either. I'm afraid the development is impossible to stop. Because a large majority of people don't care/understand
It is so sad cause the government is on right wing hands... if it was on the left.. it would be ok right?
Please and thank you i dont want a social credit score
what do you have to hide?
who are you going to assault?
which store will you break in to, lazy person? 😎
Thank you !!! The other thing that's freaky is we are paying for it.
'If you've got nothing hide ...' are the words of totalitarians.
Hi Government,
I am unemployed right now, are you hiring?
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”
- Ben Franklin
Ben Franklin was smart that why put "essential" in that quote. Giving up non-essential liberty for safety is sometimes wise, and those who do not do might end up with neither liberty nor safety.
@@myothersoul1953 Not giving up non-essential liberty will never lead to a loss of liberty. It could lead to the loss of safety but at least you would have the ability to defend yourself in a hypothetical dangerous environment. Privacy rights are essential tho.
@@derrickg5612 Hypothetically many things could happen. That's why we should deal in reality and not some extreme imaginary slippery slope scenario.
If the police were sometimes allowed to use face recognition doesn't mean they will put a camera outside of AA meetings to see who is attending. If they did people should start asking the police some hard questions and voting for different representatives.
@@myothersoul1953 You just posed a hypothetical scenario to me, but in that scenario, I could see police officials easily justifying cameras outside of AA meetings. We need to know where the alcoholics are... for your safety. Once a government attains a certain power it doesn't like to give it up. That's the reality of the nature of people in power.
@@derrickg5612 Just because the police could come us with a justification doesn't mean it would or should be accepted. They should need a warrant.
We should not allow the state to put up cameras up without good cause. But we don't need to ban cameras to do that. We should not allow the police to track people without good cause. That's true whether they use credit cards, cell phones signals, face recognition software, face recognition brainware or any other technology.
Banning face recognition software won't solve the bigger problem. Solve the bigger problem and face recognition software won't be a problem.
Just look at China, do you want that?
Joshua Iwueze love scam i guess? 😬
CHINA IS A COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP, AMERICA IS A DEMOCRACY WHERE PEOPLE HAVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. SURVEILLANCE CAMS ARE SIMPLY A TOOL.
ACCORDING TO YOUR FLAWED LOGIC WE SHOULD DO AWAY WITH PRISONS, POLICE, AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SIMPLY BECAUSE COMMIE CHINA ALSO HAS THEM
@China Expat : America has never been a democracy. That is a bold faced lie that has been told to us by our oppressors.
Many people do. The current Democratic platform, of which millions agree with, want our country to mirror China in many ways. We are in grave danger, but no one seems to care.
Lmao well said
Biometrics actually has 3 facets - 1. Surveillance, 2. Tracking/Monitoring and the 3rd according to the DoD is Targeting (with Military weapons) referred to as Biometric Targeting Recognition.
I wanna know who TF dislikes this information.
Skynet.
It's a nice sentiment, but the ship has already sailed. There's no putting this Genie back in the bottle.
Bootlickers
If I am disability I don’t have to pay 💰 tax + I don’t have much time in this life anyway? Maybe?
Cornelius Valenta -‘the ones who trade their freedom for security
We have this now on CCTV cameras in little ol’ Western Australia.
If they convince you that privacy is already dead then you won't fight to protect the little we have left.
Like almost all TED talks, watch at 1.5x - 2x speed and you will hear the same info just as easily understood, without all the dramatic pauses to make the person look like they are making a deeper point than they actually made.
Over a lifetime, this can save you many hours. Which I for one will use for strumming my gusset. Thank me later.
You Funny Funny ;)
Thanking you now, ...and later.
2x is way too fast but 1.5 is perfect
This is true however the pauses allow you to abosorb what the person is saying amd think about all of the important parts. Its important to stay captovating to keep the attention so the listener gets all of the information. Its a psychological thing and its just good public speaking. This is just me but I much rather the speaking to be dramatic as you put it than a bland reading of all the info. At that point I might as well just read the script that they provide myself
Adella Malbrough, AND I’m trying to fight the modern pressure to hurry, hurry, hurry. Slowing down to listen has been a good discipline for me. I gotta admit though, I do like to fast forward and hit 2 podcast in the space of one!
WAR IS PEACE!
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY!
IGNORANCE IS STRENGHT!
BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!
I am coming to this video to defend surveillance.
.. and I am leaving opposing it.
Okay... So the person giving the talk says the government won't work according to their own rules? I live in central Europe and here it very much works like that - the government wants to use information they have on someone, so they have to ask a judge to be allowed to do it. The success rate of such a petition is nearly 100 percent because the agencies involved know exactly in which cases they are allowed to use it.
How do curtains make me safe? If a burglar wanted to make sure that I wasn't home and I was then I'd be burgled or not if they knew, if they don't know then they might be deterred or not and something worse than a burglary could happen to me.
All that I heard during this talk was a lot of fear mongering, and her "regulation and accountability" argument was completely skipped. Regulate it. Make them accountable. That works for me. She also conveniently forgot to mention the help that facial recognition could do, catching wanted fugitives and abducted children.
hi government, i just farted. did you hear?
She makes a good case!
I would only worry with face surveillance when living in a country ruled by immoral abusive totalitarian regime. But I would feel more secure with it to deter criminality especially around my neighborhood. That’s why I install security camera at home to secure it and have something to look back to in case of a break in. Best to have it in a society where criminality is rampant.
there's a difference between you have it on your private property (with no connection to the internet, or at least not uploading to the government) and government have it everywhere.
Sure, when the government turns totalitarian, it will install the cameras anyway, but the extremes aren't the only possibilities.
You are so concerned about the government's use of this tech, I'm more concerned about Blackwater and private "security" firms, which are actually mercenaries, and thugs who will employ these against people at things like the Standing Rock water protector occupations, with no oversight, they can plant false evidence at places you've been then give their "proof" to law enforcement.
I’ll never forget went fishing with a great uncle of mine who worked for and eventually retired from NASA he was on the original team that installed NORAD he said. (I’ve no reason to doubt him) One late night fishing like 10 years ago somehow or another we got on the topic and he said when they were installing the equipment, or whatever he did I forget, said they had retinal scanners to access doorways. That was in 50’s
Yeah the government, especially the CIA, fund places like MIT in order to get them to develop technology strictly for them. And then over time, they allow this technology to be sold to the public from private companies. An they are very deliberate about what and when they choose to release. They have very specific goals in mind for allowing this tech out there.
For example, the Navy creates the deep web,or dark web, so they could communicate without being traced. But they realized anyone who accesses the network would know anyone else on there was military. So they released it to the public so they could remain anonymous, but also to encourage other clandestine groups to use the technology, giving them a false sense of security using a system that they created.
The same is true of smart phones and social media. They don't create everything themselves, but they do boost the things they want to be popular, like Google. Take a look into Google's creator and who he has ties to and how he got off the ground. It isn't organic at all. Many of those people involved have ties to intelligence and Israel. And TH-cam is linked directly from the same people.
And once those people are turned into billionaires, if some technology does manage to organically pop up, they just buy it and adapt it to their needs. It's pretty sickening really.
@August Greig : I was thinking you had something valuable to say, until your antisemitism gave away your true intent.
@@augustgreig9420 your whole comment can be summarised into "i hate jews"
@@aylbdrmadison1051 Please tell me what I said that was antisemetic? I never even mentioned Jews.
@@abcdxx1059 Okay, this has to be trolling. Please tell me what I said that was antisemetic? I never even mentioned Jews.
and we get to pay for the privilege of this surveillance with our hard earned tax dollars
Twisted Humor / I don’t have to pay tax I Am on disability..
Brian Tunzi thats not a flex lol
@@nah3375 9:31 If one murders a baby in taxpayer funded privacy butcher shop, or does govt assisted kidnapping for control or money, it's still a crime that should result in prison. No immunity for feminists. Judgment Day will come.
Thank god for these people
@Kade Crockford - I am currently working on a reverse surveillance app that will allow the surveilled to detect and identify the person that is surveilling and surveil him/her back. Unfortunately, it seems that the final stages of my project are going to cost more than I can afford.
IMPORTANT! specially now 👑
Powerful speech
Too late, anyone with a smart phone is already 'scanned'.
'We are living in the doomed timelime' starter kit:
- TEDx
- Joe Rogan Experience
- Scott Ross
Just because different people talk about problems we, as humanity should solve responsibly, doesn't mean we're all doomed.
The world is not all butterflies and rainbows. We have important topics to discuss and ignoring that becomes part of the problem.
@@TheKeule33 I agree. And it is important to discuss them in a reasonable and level headed way. We should make every effort to avoid things like confirmation bias and bad reasoning. For example logical fallacies, the slippery slope fallacy. See if you can spot it in the video above. I think it is around the ten minute mark.
Never did think face recognition was a good tech! Nice one!
This is a good talk. It´s very relevant for all of us.
Resistance is futile. We can ask, protest, scream and shout, but in the end it will be done.
0:30 Exactly!...
We can't let this happen.
They're intruding on ever aspect of our lives, like we're no longer humans... Its Not Okay.
well spoken, thank you for saying this out loud!!!
Thank you, great talk. I'm surprised that I hadn't watched a video on this yet.
Solid delivery to the point.
GREAT SPEECH! EVERYONE PLEASE SHARE THIS ON YOUR INSTAGRAM AND FACEBOOK! PEOPLE NEED TO HEAR THIS!
I agree with the need to resist facial recognition technology. It turns a community into a gulag where all of us held despite the idea that we are free.
Minority Report is here
Once after arriving at a hospital, after abusing and battering me with their technology, they forced me to point my hand towards a human trafficking sign and the nurse turned it around. She then closed the curtain and they made my clothes shrink to my body. I could hear a voice through voice to skull, they told me I wasn't allowed to move because I was entering into something I couldn't get out of. They said they'd kill me of I tried to "get out"...
GREAT SPEECH!!!!!!!!
The ACLU can die in a fire, but this is a great talk. Liked and saved.
AFTER I Got out of the hospital ,,Soon after A Scammer calls me telling me I have to pay tax on 16.600 + 29 cents and if I Don't pay the cops will come to my door in 30 + - HRS .. I had to call BS I don't have to pay any tax .. Yep You got it ?...
This topic is fascinating because it transcends the fundamental beliefs of republicans and democrats.. it is an an inherently nonpartisan issue, like “campaign finance reform” that has a logical and obvious conclusion, which is fundamentally acceptable regardless of party association. I think Kade’s argument is amazing and we should be acting across the country!!
Yes! Finally an issue we can all agree on! Thanks, Kade. Good talk.
Total misrepresentation of what happened to Talley. 'Two tipsters called Crime Stoppers to report that the robber, shown in the photos, was Talley.
Police showed the photos to Talley’s ex-wife and she said it was him. Talley said his ex-wife had reason to lie, because they were involved in a bitter custody dispute.
The lawsuit states that Det. Jeffrey Hart, in violation of proper identification procedures, pointed to Talley’s photograph while showing an array of photos to the teller at the second bank."
Video lasts 13:37, there’s a reason
I question anyone who so blatantly refuses to elaborate. So unless you care to do so, your comment carries no weight.
Aylbdr Madison I question anyone who doesn’t care to Google yet questions.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 Well I had to search it because I had no idea. I found that it is lingo associated with "elite" and hackers.
Allen Bao Ever heard of DuckDuckGoing it (a Privacy Based Browser) as an alternative to Googling it?
Nova Cynthia Arts yes I have and.....?
In our society, we must protect ourselves from the government, which is the reason I ALWAYS carry a personal weapon. I don't carry a personal weapon to protect my family & myself from "bad people", but rather, to protect my family and myself from the government...namely, the police. Here in Wichita, Kansas, the Wichita Police Department can now, LEGALLY, redirect HOME SECURITY CAMERAS if the police officer "feels unsafe being seen on a video monitor", while on a call...even at our private homes! Also, the Wichita Police Department has murdered an unarmed man WHO WAS STANDING INSIDE OF THE DOORWAY OF HIS HOME, and the cop (WICHITA POLICE OFFICER JUSTIN RAPP) got away with the murder of an innocent man, whose name was ANDREW FINCH.
Great talk loved it ❤️
This dude's voice is kinda weird but truthy enough to get my attention.
It's a lady..lol
it's a woman
It's a non-binary female...I guess!
The cats out of the bag. It will never be banned.
But it can be killed. It may have 9 lives but god damn it, it can be killed.
It's already being implemented around the world! Thank God she gave this lecture to bring the topic more into the forefront, though. Social credit/conditioning is also much easier to pull off with this technology.
And we are paying them to do it.
There's no assumption of privacy on public property. If you want to stop it, you have to privatize all publicly owned property.
It is scary up to some point. To be honest, facial recognition should be implemented in the streets, at least in my country (Spain). I am one of those who say that has nothing to hide, but of course facial recognition shouldn't enter our private areas (houses, or even the technology we use should be private). Nevertheless, at public spaces facial recognition should be implemented to increase security. The example that you gave of how prisoners behave differently when they know that they are being recorded is a very good one to portrait, that maybe rapists, robbers, and other types of bad persons don't do what they do if they know that they are being recorded.
How about a transparent society?
I am actually familiar with the technology. It can be fooled, for one thing.
It can also be used by the bad guys.
So are you seriously saying that the cops should not use this technology while bad guys unquestionably would?
Can't agree more!
A lot of people in the audience laugh and although I'm not judging too harshly, this is a very serious topic that has been spoken about for a while now.
"If you want to know who controls you, just look at who you can't criticize." Voltaire
I think the UK has more CCTV than any other country. This discussion has been in the public eye recently and basically very carefully regulations are required to ensure that data is not collected for any "face" which is not on a formalised suspect list and all data should be erased (or never recorded) apart from validated triggers.
The power seekers of the world will _"say"_ anything to keep and gain even more control over us.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 It isn't power seekers in this case, it is paranoid protectionism, endorsed by authoritarian judgemental self righteous folk. We all want a degree of protection, to prevent crime and catch criminals. The paranoia that AI is flawed is justified up to a point, but it should be a part of reasonable law enforcement. That's the balance, though, isn't it? Reasonable...
Good info., and with a good sense of humour -- That is a great presentation.
Years of people saying...but did anything change?
I don’t use my iPhone id finger print or face
Talks about face surveillance ban and at the same time shows faces of people who attended the TED talks.
I strongly agree
What's horribly un-funny is that if you have a porch pirate raid off with a package from your porch, and she's on camera, the cops won't pursue it further. (Such robbers must pretty much be caught in the act to be caught at all.) This technology doesn't work *for* us as much as is advertised.
I'm not sure what this woman does: she warns about privacy breeching or she advertises it. She truly thinks she does the first but who can stop that anyway? And would most of people prefer the "big dad watching you" scenario? Why? Since he is a guarantor of their safety! I would add: many countries like Russia are implementing this tech without asking their civilians. The countries which didn't do that would be more open for terrorism and other crimes. It is a challenge.
Well explained.
MEME: The FBI would like to know your location.
Well. the ACLU finally does something useful.
You'll all get used to it. There's no way the govt would get over not having this, and if they'll do it illegally if it's made illegal.
I once seen a map of police cameras of district 4 in Zürich, Switzerland. (That’s where the relight district is).
There is literally not a single square meter that is not covered..
This should have so many more views. 😥
Thank you!
Good stuff. How do we fight?
Check out Fight for the Future call your Congressman.
Don't willingly give up your privacy. Boycott companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, etc. Inform your friends and family about what's going on.
The other commenter here said to write your Congressman. But Ralph Nader taught me that doesn't really work. What we have to do is band together. Find a group of about 1,000 or more people in your district and get them organized. Organize online, spread the word, get people informed. Then you start holding rallies in real life and recruit from there. You only need to start with about 25 people in order to grow to 1,000.
Once you have the real physical numbers, then you go to your local Congressman's office and confront him there. Don't be hostile. Explain to him or her that these issues are extremely important to you, and if they are unwilling to do anything about it, then you will be forced to vote for someone who might actually listen. Record the interaction and upload it to social media. Use their own weapons against them. Get the word out.
Writing letters is fine, but it rarely changes anything. Some intern is reading them and throwing most of them away, or sending a generic response letter with a signature which may or may not be basically rubber stamped on. But when 1,000 voters show up at the Congressman's office, that gets their attention. Remember that most of these people are whores. Yes, they love money, and that's why lobbyists have so much pull. But what're all of those campaign contributions for? To get votes.
See, we have the power to cut out the middle man. We are the voters. We are the reason they raise all of that money, in hopes of persuading US. So when they see 1,000 people willing to show up and confront them, they assume there are many more who feel the same way who didn't show up. When they know they're being filmed, they're going to be very careful with what they say. And when they know you are coming back again next week, I can promise you that they're going to do their homework so they can have a better answer for you next time.
This has always been Nader's strategy, and he's gotten more accomplished for the American citizen than any other private citizen in history, and arguably more than most politicians. From safety regulations for workers, seat belts in cars and the single most important thing he ever achieved, the freedom of information act or FOIA, and many more which are too numerous to mention.
Nader's strategy just works. So if you're serious about wanting change, that's the best way I've ever seen it done. And I'm more than willing to help. I live in Louisville, Ky.
Not possible unless you're willing to throw your cell phone in a lake.
Bearly Listening I’ve done that ! 😂
@Bearly Listening : I use DuckDuckGo with little to no problem as a search engine. It is our laziness and apathy that got us here in the first place. As far as cell phones go: 25 years ago things were generally much better, and in no small part due to the fact that very very few people even had cell phones.
Exactly, you make it impossible
Your smartphone already tracks all your movements, so anyone at any public meeting, can be scanned by police scanning equiptment
If you have a GPS smartphone, they are already tracking you at this level; regardless of what you have your setting configured for.
I'm 100% positive my GPS is never on except when I choose. Admittedly there's a lot of menus/apps and settings you must go through in your phone and in Google system settings themselves multi tier no less😐 (takes me over an hour on a new device).. so I understand where yr coming from.
Perfect idea: Continue to wear masks 😷
Only Idiots will trade their freedom for security. I appreciate you and your speech. More people should speak up about the government they are not what they seem to be..
I had cops come to my door because Facial Recognition notified police that someone with a random twitter account used one of my online pictures as their profile pic and made death threats to a school..
An excellent talk. Here in the UK, there is one closed circuit television camera for every 11 people. Automatic number plate recognition cameras submit 50 million checks per day. London's Metropolitan Police ('the MET') are trialling facial recognition software. Interactions with the police, including those involving no crime, are recorded in a central database ('the Police National Computer'). Mobile phone data can be collected without obtaining a warrant (PACE 2000). Britain has a centralised government, with weak local councils. The US has a freshly emboldened President, and the UK has a new Prime Minister who is also inclined to be an authoritarian. Look at China, and wonder if it's the future.
Easy to say when you not afraid for your life in the streets.
Walmart uses facial recognition and the government uses Walmarts system to monitor citizens.
To comply with Real ID act must submit to FR technology.
No domestic flight or federal building access etc without.
The other option being a passport, which, again uses FR technology.
This is one of the first Tedx lectures I've enjoyed in a while! It's been a lot of jaded, identity politics, ideological, SJW, nonsense for quite a few of the these. But not so with this one, I enjoyed the topic and lecturer (although the info. is pretty scary)! Just think of this lecture when you sign up for Elon's neural link brain implant! ;)
If the governments apply it, that's means no freeeeedom,,, bye freedom.
God Wiser!
No vaccines,no contact tracing. No Bill gates. Please God,no Bill gates.
But we can leave the phone at home.lmao
Yeah, I pay Norton to keep my computer secure, yet Norton keeps giving Google access to my webcam !!!
Why does Google want access to my webcam???
Google wants to sell your facial information or other visual data.
Then Bic will have pop-up ads for razors when it looks like you need to shave [without telling you that you are scruffy looking], Flintstones Vitamins will announce hang-over strength Gummies because the bags under your eyes are ALWAYS worse on Saturday and Sunday morning. And the pizza & beer special you ordered via delivery the night before confirms a lot...
After a bit, clothing ads, tailored to how you look for each season start showing up. Funny how Ross always knows your color in the adverts!
Just by some careful examination of trends over time, a persons life could be easy to read.
1:10
This guy has the exact opposite haircut from the speaker. And the look on his face looks like he knows.
Weekend Warrior OMG your right lmao
“Face surveillance should be banned”
*Owns iPhone.
*Takes selfies and uses FaceTime.
I thought that was Rob Beckett in the thumbnail.
Hahaha!
I want to hear the opposing views.
I don't think she/he is telling us everything.
Nick Cione Facial recognition helps put her Antifa buddies in jail when they loot and riot.
@@DegreesOfThree obviously
I will write legislation protecting our privacy from the overwhelming capacity of the government and larger corporations................... In other words, Google has the software for face surveillance and they use it.
And that boys and girls is why our founding fathers wrote the second amendment, and why everyone should have a fully automatic rifle in the closet
UK just got facial recognition like last week
On the plus side it would allow all crimes to be solved if it worked perfectly and perhaps prevent some. I agree that the problem is oversight which should be strict, restrictive, outside political influence, transparent and unforgiving of anybody that breaks the rules. Also rules should be in place that automatic face recognition cannot be used as the sole source of evidence in a criminal conviction because of false positives. However if the technology exists then it will be used.
Because of this?
You better go back and read those agreements with your phone Co. where you will find out that they can do what every they want with your non-private information, your private info scrubbed from your daily activity within a zip code, just a bunch of dots moving around meaning nothing to you and me but much to those who would like to sale you something. Learn the laws that concern the usage of the zip code and you will find out that the governments and commerce are required to used the zip code but you are not, so why do you use it because they told you so that it makes sending mail faster and easier, governments and commerce are considered entities, a person in the eyes of the law but not a natural person also recognized as a incompetent person and a deceased person all carrying rights within the law. So the person that uses the zip code is recognized by the government as a commercial entity residing within a zip code of many taxing districts that they are required to pay taxes to by law who are the true residents of your state. A commercial entity must apply for a business license with the state government that you own and becomes employed to your state to provide you with the refined goods created form your states resources that the government manages for you. Learn your states "without recourse" law located in commercial transactions codes and you might find out about well kept secrete.
1984
I think you will find it is 2020.
How was the coma? We taped it for you.
@@angrytedtalks Lol! You do know they are referring to George Orwell, right?
@@angrytedtalks wooosh
Sorry, I just had to do it in this case
@@viktorg6823You know "We taped it for you" was also a reference to Big Brother?
Don’t forget to use cash, as much as you can.
And say no to Huawei 5G, watching us.
Someone told that the reason way the Chinese facial recognition systems work so efficiently, is because they only have to recognise one of them.