@teohontech7141 I would buy it for £369 from amazon UK. But I just bought the veiwsonic vp16 oled for £410 in September. But if it was £278 like in your video then I could probably justify it.
update @uperfect - was excited to purchase it after this review, just received the display and will be returning it tomorrow. the areas where the screen meets the encasing are covered with glue and sand dust. looks sloppy.
to me this is the best portable monitor. If you want a more affordable model get the one off amaozn with no touchscreen but if you want touchscreen which is the one I have I can say it is amazing very awesome when I want one screen in front of me and just want to treat it as a iPad. It looks incredible and I do downscale it to 2560x1600p to get 120hz. If you keep it native res it only does 100hz which is still good but I don't notice the difference. This model is slim and light weight itand is the easiest thing to bring anywhere!
i was thinking if I can connect this screen to my 13 inch macbook pro instead of upgrading to an expensive 16 inch macbook pro, what do you think teoh?
Hey, thanks for review - how would you rate the screen uniformity (especially low brightness)? Do you feel like it's a rejected panel (as ive heard), things like dead, stuck pixels, uniformity issues, stuff like that ? From what I understand the whole cable ordeal is because USB has different versions and each one has sub versions, so for example usb 3.2 2x2 has 20gbs and a certain wattage attached, but usb 3.1 and usb 4 has different ones again. And then each usb C cable also has these specifications. So when you're using 120hz or higher brightness it's pushing more GBs or more watts. And even a certified cable at xyz speed/wattage is only for certain lenght, because impedance goes up the longer it is - so 1m is ok, but maybe 2 or 3m isnt ok anymore. For example my motherboard has usb 2.0, usb 3.0, and usb C 3.2 2x2 port. So I assume only that one single port out of maybe 10~ is rated to be single cable solution capable.
Not sure if USB 3.2 gen 2x2 is able to output video. Anyway, typical USB C ports can put out ~15W of power. So depending on brightness, that may or may not be enough. Uniformity seems alright. Better than LCDs that typically have lower brightness around edges, but it’s not something that I will notice unless I measure with a colour calibrator.
@@teohontech7141 not only is 3.2 2x2 able to output video, it can do 120hz at 2880x1800. the wattage depends entirely on the version, some usb specs allow up to 240watts of delivery (USB 3.1 PD).. (PD = Power delivery) spec.
The max. 240W is correct. But in practice it is not available for notebooks and desktops. In practice it is max. 100W. Notebooks generally output 15W. There are also some models that can do more. What the respective USB port can do is always determined by the manufacturer of the device or part. The 240W will probably only be implemented with Thunderbolt 5 or USB-C 5.
@ 240W unlikely to be on laptops for the simple fact that laptops already have problems with battery life themselves, and we want laptops to charge other devices? Well, unless laptop is connected to power
Currently, only 15W is generally possible for notebooks/laptops. Although a maximum of 100W would be possible. This is only possible if it comes from a power source (e.g. monitor when it is connected to the power supply).
Having touchscreen is a nice bonus and can be useful at times. E.g. I can still sign in to my computer without a keyboard or mouse connected, because I can use touchscreen to enter password.
@@SweStonk Not sure why there are two models, one with touch and one without. For USB-C cable, just get one that mentions video support or has video resolution listed on the product specification.
![Portable, 18", 120Hz, HDR Monitor for $240?!?!? LIES? [UPerfect UXbox E4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/frB0gHAU6VE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Portable, 18", 120Hz, HDR Monitor for $240?!?!? LIES? [UPerfect UXbox E4]](/img/tr.png)
Thank you for your thorough and professional review!:)
If only it was £278 in the uk hint hint 😅 still a fantastic monitor though.
@@zantesh it's £175 on aliexpress
Check reviews and seller reputation before buying
@@teohontech7141 it's from the official uperfect store,I received mine few days ago
@teohontech7141 I would buy it for £369 from amazon UK. But I just bought the veiwsonic vp16 oled for £410 in September.
But if it was £278 like in your video then I could probably justify it.
Loving all the consistent video releases!
Extremely professional review. Thanks.
Great review! Thank you for your objectivity and metric driven approach.
update @uperfect - was excited to purchase it after this review, just received the display and will be returning it tomorrow. the areas where the screen meets the encasing are covered with glue and sand dust. looks sloppy.
Bravo man. Thanks.
Great review
94% Adobe RGB is really good. I did not expect that high of a number!
It's easy for OLED display to reach 90%+++ AdobeRGB.
to me this is the best portable monitor. If you want a more affordable model get the one off amaozn with no touchscreen but if you want touchscreen which is the one I have I can say it is amazing very awesome when I want one screen in front of me and just want to treat it as a iPad. It looks incredible and I do downscale it to 2560x1600p to get 120hz. If you keep it native res it only does 100hz which is still good but I don't notice the difference. This model is slim and light weight itand is the easiest thing to bring anywhere!
is it the video or does the screen feel like its shaking? like here on the 14:15, the image of the water is shaking
Doesn’t look like it’s shaking to me
Yes, the one at 14.15 looks really weird.
But you have to look very closely.
It's very difficult to see.
i was thinking if I can connect this screen to my 13 inch macbook pro instead of upgrading to an expensive 16 inch macbook pro, what do you think teoh?
can you check if any wacom pens work on this screen please, i would really like to use this as a samsung dex display.
This can connect to your Macbook Pro. But you also need BetterDisplay app to handle UI scaling as mentioned in the video.
This display does not work with pens.
@@teohontech7141 thanks man.
Hello, neither the Amazon link nor Amazon Spain link say anything about the touch screen. Is this simply an error in Amazon's information?
Oh you are right. It seems like Amazon has list it as not a touchscreen.
Strange because the specs are similar except for that.
Does it have any burn in protection, like automatic pixel refresh? Because without it, it won't last long.
Not that I know of
Hey, thanks for review - how would you rate the screen uniformity (especially low brightness)? Do you feel like it's a rejected panel (as ive heard), things like dead, stuck pixels, uniformity issues, stuff like that ?
From what I understand the whole cable ordeal is because USB has different versions and each one has sub versions, so for example usb 3.2 2x2 has 20gbs and a certain wattage attached, but usb 3.1 and usb 4 has different ones again. And then each usb C cable also has these specifications. So when you're using 120hz or higher brightness it's pushing more GBs or more watts. And even a certified cable at xyz speed/wattage is only for certain lenght, because impedance goes up the longer it is - so 1m is ok, but maybe 2 or 3m isnt ok anymore.
For example my motherboard has usb 2.0, usb 3.0, and usb C 3.2 2x2 port. So I assume only that one single port out of maybe 10~ is rated to be single cable solution capable.
Not sure if USB 3.2 gen 2x2 is able to output video.
Anyway, typical USB C ports can put out ~15W of power. So depending on brightness, that may or may not be enough.
Uniformity seems alright. Better than LCDs that typically have lower brightness around edges, but it’s not something that I will notice unless I measure with a colour calibrator.
@@teohontech7141 not only is 3.2 2x2 able to output video, it can do 120hz at 2880x1800. the wattage depends entirely on the version, some usb specs allow up to 240watts of delivery (USB 3.1 PD).. (PD = Power delivery) spec.
The max. 240W is correct.
But in practice it is not available for notebooks and desktops.
In practice it is max. 100W.
Notebooks generally output 15W.
There are also some models that can do more.
What the respective USB port can do is always determined by the manufacturer of the device or part.
The 240W will probably only be implemented with Thunderbolt 5 or USB-C 5.
@ 240W unlikely to be on laptops for the simple fact that laptops already have problems with battery life themselves, and we want laptops to charge other devices? Well, unless laptop is connected to power
Currently, only 15W is generally possible for notebooks/laptops.
Although a maximum of 100W would be possible.
This is only possible if it comes from a power source (e.g. monitor when it is connected to the power supply).
Got it for $249.99 from Walmart.
Does this have auto dimming when u far from monitor.?. im comparing it to asus portable oled.. the price almost double
Auto dimming? Like auto brightness?
@ like asus mq13ah .. it detect if u far from monitor. it will dims the display to prevent burn in screen
@@ultradroid4k There's no such feature with the uperfect
@@teohontech7141 thanks for the information 👍
sir does it work with macbook in vertical or portrait mode?
Yes. Horizontal and vertical
Which is better touch or the no touch?
Having touchscreen is a nice bonus and can be useful at times. E.g. I can still sign in to my computer without a keyboard or mouse connected, because I can use touchscreen to enter password.
With touchscreen u get 8bit without u get 10bit
@@SweStonk i don't have the touchscreen and i'm still stuck on 8 bit :( what??
I saw a review that said u get 10 bit on the monitor without touchscreen! What cable are you using? Think you need usb c to get it not sure tho
@@SweStonk Not sure why there are two models, one with touch and one without. For USB-C cable, just get one that mentions video support or has video resolution listed on the product specification.
itu aspect ratio 16:9
punya aku pun sama