I don't know why you'd say that because that is one of the basic features to work on in autonomous driving. Don't get me wrong: whether software can correctly do that or not is a separate issue. Just saying I don't understand why you'd use one the basics as a measuring stick...
EXACTLY!! Single point of failure anyone? And if each chip costs $3,000 each, 2 chips is $6k. And if your new cars Thor chip fails, is it a $10k bill to replace in the future? Will insurance just write off the car if the BCM fails? It all sounds good when engineers are drawing it up. But in todays America, where engineers were trained in colleges where men think they are women, and women think they are tough, I'm more convinced that America is too stupid to survive, no matter the TFLOPS involved.
@@12Burton24 autonomy in vehicles comes in 5 classes, and currently Jensen and the team said the previous chip before Thor could be deployed at level 3 maybe 4 down the road so I’m wondering if this will enable standard level 5 which means there is absolutely no reason to have a steering wheel involved, that’s how smart the chip could be
Did you do your research before writing what you wrote? You think they just develop the system just to talk about it? Go do a research about the number of companies using their technologies
Nvidia's brute calc force will easily create unlimited synthetic driving data and thereby make up for Tesla's real road data. Maybe within a few hours. Tesla has lost.
yes Tesla lost. Nvidia has allready a lot of the car company partners and Tesla? Until Tesla can show some revenue from it with other car company as customer NVIDIA won.
Tesla is only level 2. Mercedes is coming out with level 3. Tesla will never be the leader due to its lack of LiDAR. People who use autopilot, like it’s fully autonomous, are breaking the law and in extreme danger.
@@Elusive_Chicken other brands are working with NVIDIA thats why they are ahead. Ask ChatGPT how many brands are working with NVIDIA. They only get 0.3B per quarterly revenue from this but it rising quckly.
@@12Burton24 In December 2021, Tesla started installing an upgraded accelerated processing unit (APU) in the newly-built Tesla Model 3 and Model Y cars - the AMD RDNA 2-based Ryzen APU. Before this upgrade, Tesla Model 3 and Model Y used to have the basic low-level Intel Atom graphics processing unit (GPU).
![[Re:all TREASURE] EP.6 in 방콕ㅣ🚩 쩡캠의 방콕 투어 빵 마이 와이 👍](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uyFw-nItA_s/mqdefault.jpg)
‘15 thousand engineering years in safety’.. Wow, that required several cpu-brain cycles for me to get my head around that statement
its all fun and games until your car gets hacked
I would be impressef if they test it on streets where crosswalks dont have red lights and pedestrians have right of way like it is here in europe.
Tesla is already doing this with their cars today. To me it’s a little too cautious but it definitely works.
I don't know why you'd say that because that is one of the basic features to work on in autonomous driving.
Don't get me wrong: whether software can correctly do that or not is a separate issue. Just saying I don't understand why you'd use one the basics as a measuring stick...
Try to simulate Indian roads to make the most out of your processors 🤣
can I upgrade my grandmother? She always bumps into walls with her roller
Where is the redundancy? Do you need two of these things per car? Is nvidia going to consult with each brand for software?
EXACTLY!! Single point of failure anyone? And if each chip costs $3,000 each, 2 chips is $6k. And if your new cars Thor chip fails, is it a $10k bill to replace in the future? Will insurance just write off the car if the BCM fails?
It all sounds good when engineers are drawing it up. But in todays America, where engineers were trained in colleges where men think they are women, and women think they are tough, I'm more convinced that America is too stupid to survive, no matter the TFLOPS involved.
Jenson's head looks unreal
Looks animated 😹
What is the model of this leather jacket?
the demo looks solid.
So what level does this new chip enable vehicles deployed with it to be and secondly when will it be deployed
it’s not a hardware problem, it’s a software problem
@@chickenp7038 I’m aware of that, that’s why I asked my friend
Level? What do you mean with level?
@@12Burton24 autonomy in vehicles comes in 5 classes, and currently Jensen and the team said the previous chip before Thor could be deployed at level 3 maybe 4 down the road so I’m wondering if this will enable standard level 5 which means there is absolutely no reason to have a steering wheel involved, that’s how smart the chip could be
@@Andrew-yy2sn well see you still seem to think that more hardware equals better software
Competition is good.
Tesla needs competition.
Pretty sure Tesla even uses Nvidia products. Without Nvidia you are almost unable to do big simulations and development.
@@12Burton24 like with their built-in "Nvidia" Ryzen APU with RDNA2?
@@Redstoner2b2t .....
Put this SoC on the Nintendo switch pro / 2 😅
Nvidia knows how to market and then pump the stock and insiders dump them on you at overvaluations
This will go into future Lucid Airs?
not sure about Lucid, but JLR will be using this at some point in the future.
Jensen the goat
promises promises promises. reality is always harder than u thought!
Exactly. It’s going to be interesting to see if this is successful.
Tesla is already doing this with cars on the road right now.
Did you do your research before writing what you wrote?
You think they just develop the system just to talk about it?
Go do a research about the number of companies using their technologies
@@CYCLEGAMER1no Tesla is not. It’s level 2.
Tenstorrent is the best.
😅
Level 5?
Maybe with B100 is possible or the next next generation.
Nvidia's brute calc force will easily create unlimited synthetic driving data and thereby make up for Tesla's real road data. Maybe within a few hours. Tesla has lost.
😂😂
yes Tesla lost. Nvidia has allready a lot of the car company partners and Tesla?
Until Tesla can show some revenue from it with other car company as customer NVIDIA won.
Also NVIDIA sell the next generation GPU clusters which is faar ahead of the current H100. So they can never lose on Mashine Learning.
For Tesla?
isnt efficient enough for tesla lol
Tesla uses proprietary chips now I believe. Tesla is so far b hind everyone it’s a joke.
Tesla lost.
@@CaptainCataractss NVIDIA works with next generation GPU Cluster while everyone else like Tesla has H100 GPU. So no chance.
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
WOW…watching this video made me realize how far ahead Tesla is. The future is looking great overall though.
Nah, other brands are way ahead with self-driving. Tesla is just more public with it and willing to endanger people with semi-functioning software.
@@Elusive_Chicken 🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝
Tesla is only level 2. Mercedes is coming out with level 3. Tesla will never be the leader due to its lack of LiDAR. People who use autopilot, like it’s fully autonomous, are breaking the law and in extreme danger.
@@Elusive_Chicken other brands are working with NVIDIA thats why they are ahead. Ask ChatGPT how many brands are working with NVIDIA. They only get 0.3B per quarterly revenue from this but it rising quckly.
Lol. Over 10 years in beta, I hope so.
Was this filmed on an iPhone 3Gs ? - wtf
What did you see?
I'll foil your plot
Nice attempt but Tesla's chip destroys Nvidia on performance.
not
@@AlexPittiStockMan it does
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lol Tesla’s chip? U mean AMD?
Tesla ahead but could leverage this
They design their own chips. The next generation might even be announced in the next few weeks.
I would be surprized if Tesla is not using Nvidia Softwate and Hardware products.
@@12Burton24 In December 2021, Tesla started installing an upgraded accelerated processing unit (APU) in the newly-built Tesla Model 3 and Model Y cars - the AMD RDNA 2-based Ryzen APU. Before this upgrade, Tesla Model 3 and Model Y used to have the basic low-level Intel Atom graphics processing unit (GPU).
Nah, other brands are way ahead with self-driving. Tesla is just more public with it and willing to endanger people with semi-functioning software.
@@Elusive_Chicken are you re-tarded ? because you copy pasted this message. you either don't remember rewriting it or you have mental issues
Tesla already miles ahead
Nah, other brands are way ahead with self-driving. Tesla is just more public with it and willing to endanger people with semi-functioning software.
@@Elusive_Chicken by that logic, trains are even further ahead, best line followers in the industry