this is the resilt after years of doing what they want without considering the plp they will affect. Enough is enough! repeated acts without accountability is such high handed approaches in rolling out initiatives. with continuous bad decisions made on our behalf, they should not longer be given the blank cheque
@@Ooratheoolfdog It’s dangerous when an officer of the law states that this contravenes the law. If you knew about this, why did you not raise it and allow a civilian Bertha Henson to raise this instead?
Very sad. Much efforts are made by many organisations to safeguard the personal data of individuals by complying with the PDPA. Here, we are now aware that there are "organisations" that need not comply with the Act. In such a case, would the whole PDPA be made redundant when personal data can be retrieved from such "exempted" organisations? Does it mean that our personal data are not safe in Sg? So sad. Is there anything that can be done? What about other "exempted" organisations? Do they have similar situations?
They wun be bothered to lah. Its not as if there is anyone or anything there to compel them to do so right? This is called Ownself Exonerate Ownself. Thats what happens when you give a political party blank cheque power with no one there to question them.
One set of rules for private business and one set of rules for government. So Shan or Edwin Tong will come out and spin some complicated legalistic BS to patch the hole they dug
Yes. Exactly. The NRIC format for those born between 1968-2000(?) is the dumbest I have ever seen....revealing the yr of birth in a heartbeat just from the 1st 2 numeric characters. Shout-out to Ms Bertha Henson for calling out the misuse of personal data online!
A very stoic response by saying 10 to 15 days to investigate the issue Typical of public servant administration and formatted reply In this digital age great deal of harm could eventuate during this period Admit the seriousness of the shortcomings, apologise and reply with feedbacks
This has been the practice including vehicle owners particulars. This is transparency and accountability. For safety concern, the applicants identity must also be revealed to parties concerned.
Thank you for your effort. There are more to look at from this post. Not just this exposure but the lack of constantly reviewing their applications due to the ability of technology advancement. Do not be complacent if you admit that the other side of good technology users there are the opposite wrong users using technologies for their own profits often at the expenses of the owner lost. Do admit your fault only then you can be respected and trusted. Think again your response to any such notification.
![CAMPปลิ้น | รวม Highlight 2024! PART [1/2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hnvNnvYloU/mqdefault.jpg)
this is the resilt after years of doing what they want without considering the plp they will affect. Enough is enough! repeated acts without accountability is such high handed approaches in rolling out initiatives. with continuous bad decisions made on our behalf, they should not longer be given the blank cheque
That's the failure of a government department.
Direct to the point...!!!☝️👍🫵
Which MP incharge of this area have to go
As a police officer, I can confirm this contravenes the law.
Obviously it does, you can be an absolute Ah Toot gong gong to even realize that.
It has always been around. We need this for private investigation. You need this to subpoena people. I found it useful.
Go arrest every officer involved. Do your job.
@@Ooratheoolfdog It’s dangerous when an officer of the law states that this contravenes the law. If you knew about this, why did you not raise it and allow a civilian Bertha Henson to raise this instead?
@@AlphaSorceror"'Hmmm...!!!"'🙄🤔
Why is the govt always doing things, that might endanger our livilhood...???!!!😳🙄😬🤔🤨😡☝️
You seem to have this funny mindset that the PAP govt ever considered your livelihood as a priority to them.
@@sihanchen7552Well...!!!, why shdn't they...?🤔 Govt is to protect citizen's interest...!☝️😐
Very sad. Much efforts are made by many organisations to safeguard the personal data of individuals by complying with the PDPA. Here, we are now aware that there are "organisations" that need not comply with the Act. In such a case, would the whole PDPA be made redundant when personal data can be retrieved from such "exempted" organisations? Does it mean that our personal data are not safe in Sg? So sad. Is there anything that can be done? What about other "exempted" organisations? Do they have similar situations?
wow....alot of govt persons have to answer
No lah. Just honest mistake. Let’s move on.
They wun be bothered to lah.
Its not as if there is anyone or anything there to compel them to do so right?
This is called Ownself Exonerate Ownself.
Thats what happens when you give a political party blank cheque power with no one there to question them.
@@sihanchen7552...and audit them.!!!😐
One set of rules for private business and one set of rules for government. So Shan or Edwin Tong will come out and spin some complicated legalistic BS to patch the hole they dug
It has always been around. We need this for private investigation. You need this to subpoena people. I found it useful.
They do..can! You do..cannot! 2 sets of rules?
Ms Henson feedback was heeded and ACRA has taken action to resolve the matter.
What has our Ministry to say on this ?
Not to talk about ageism since people can decode such personal info from the Nric especially for the older generations.
Yes. Exactly. The NRIC format for those born between 1968-2000(?) is the dumbest I have ever seen....revealing the yr of birth in a heartbeat just from the 1st 2 numeric characters.
Shout-out to Ms Bertha Henson for calling out the misuse of personal data online!
Whats the point of allowing ppl with no access to business be available as well?
A very stoic response by saying 10 to 15 days to investigate the issue
Typical of public servant administration and formatted reply
In this digital age great deal of harm could eventuate during this period
Admit the seriousness of the shortcomings, apologise and reply with feedbacks
Is ACRA negligent?
This has been the practice including vehicle owners particulars. This is transparency and accountability. For safety concern, the applicants identity must also be revealed to parties concerned.
The issue here is about ACRA, you go and talk about vehicles.
People talk East, you wanna talk about West.
Thank you for your effort. There are more to look at from this post. Not just this exposure but the lack of constantly reviewing their applications due to the ability of technology advancement. Do not be complacent if you admit that the other side of good technology users there are the opposite wrong users using technologies for their own profits often at the expenses of the owner lost. Do admit your fault only then you can be respected and trusted. Think again your response to any such notification.
How can some not appear? Is this Animal Farm and some are more superior than others?
So what. Nothing bad will happen when the agencies are well designed.
😂😂😂😂 Sure. I am not so guillible to believe your theory.