It still shocks me when scientists told the American generals/govt that the atom bomb could possibly IGNITE THE ATMOSPHERE ON FIRE, they still used it...
It was that or the nazis would have used it and continued using it without any kind of restraint. That fact in itself is the only reason Einstein lent his expertise to the project. Oppenheimer appealed to him in essence guilting him into it by pulling the “you being a German Jew yourself, you can’t take the risk of the nazis getting this technology first.” The second time he was asked as the first time he was approached he flatly declined because he wanted no part of creating a weapon capable of killin everyone on the planet. Shortly after he is quoted as saying “I know not what the weapons of World War III will be, but the weapons of WW4 will most definitely be sticks and rocks”
Uranium can be used in implosion or gun types. Plutonium can only really be used in implosion weapons. Most weapons are implosion types. Most weapons are plutonium fueled. There have been several uranium implosion weapons.
Not quite, heck this is a very simplistic description of a nuclear initiation. A hydrogen bomb uses an atomic device to initiate hydrogen fusion so the first stage would work
@@oscargrey4416 let’s be honest today Russia stands powerful due to its nuclear Arsenal otherwise Russia would have broke in more parts and USA would have destroy Russia.Russia alliance with China make it more powerful and stand it tall like superpower as China has potential of future superpower
I learnt this in science yesterday, my teacher says it is because of the energy released when splitting the uranium atoms by shooting neutrons at it whoch creates even more neutrons because when uranium splits it releases three more neutrons
It is important to note, the Little Boy Bomb was never tested like the Fat Man Bomb which used Plutonium 239, whereas Little Boy used Uranium 235. Oppenheimer and his team were so confident in the Little Boy design it was never tested and it really wasn't proven until it was dropped on Hiroshima.
this is specifically for implosion type bombs which was only used in one of the two. But iT still accurate :) the other type of bomb used was a gun-type bomb which is less effective and require HEU rather than plutonium which is 3x more effective
The first bomb dropped on Nagasaki was an implosion bomb composed of a sphere of explosives layered on a hollow sphere of plutonium 239 with a beryllium-polonium 220 core. When the explosives were detonated that forced the plutonium 239 sphere to compress into the beryllium-polonium 210 core causing the atoms of plutonium 239 to begin to split in a chain reaction causing other plutonium 239 atoms to split in a continuous exponential chain reaction resulting in a fission nuclear explosion. The Hiroshima bomb was a gun type and used uranium 235 using conventional explosives to slam uranium 235 to stationary uranium 235 to trigger the fission Cain reaction.
There’s another way nukes are made. Prototyped anyway. It was essentially a rod of radioactive material launched at high speed into a plate of similar radioactive material that causes a cascade upon impact similar reaction just not as effective. More fallout less boom if I remember correctly.
Hey, I have a question, do we literally have to broke just one atom to create this much energy or multiple atoms are broken?? If multiple atoms are broken for this much energy then how big of a explosion can we expect from one atom only?
crazy how particles so tiny can create an explosion that could vaporise an entire city. it reminds me of the big bang. it started with a matter the size of a pea which exploded, thus the universe as we know it was created.
Don't worry; how nuclear weapons work is somewhat common knowledge already (see Wikipedia). It's quite simple in theory, but not in practice. The difficult part utilizes thousands of centrifuges to isolate rare fissionable isotopes of uranium or plutonium. That's why only a few countries have a nuclear program.
That's only how Fat Man worked (the one dropped over Nagasaki) Little Boy (the bomb dropped iver Hiroshima) used uranium in a gun-tyoe method, by using explosives to shoot 5 rings of uranium 235 into a uranium target, causing a similar chain reaction, but it's an explosion type bomb instead of implosion
There are two methods of making a nuclear bomb. One with Uranium, the other with Plutonium. The mechanics of the bomb with uranium is easier but difficult to collect enough U235 to make a viable bomb. But plutonium based bombs don't need as much to produce the same yield because the mechanics of it use implosion techniques which is more difficult to make. Notice how there is a tradeoff and you can tell which is more favorable by countries.
The little boy had a different mechanism. It had a uranium cone slam into a bigger uranium block through a barrel, like a gun almost so then the unstable particles hit the atom and split them.
Imagine explaining to a soldier from the 1300s that in the future warfare weapons go from the swords, Sheilds arrows and stakes with horses that they are used to to tanks, jets, bombs, heat seaking missiles, intercontinental missiles, drones and nuclear bombs. They would clearly just see that well the world will end because of those things. And it will
Tungsten is never used as a hydrodynamic tamper in implosion weapons. And "it normally contains a small sample of uranium or plutonium"? No, it always contains fissile fuel. That's what's actually exploding.
Actually, that is only how the Gadget (trinity test) and Mark II (Nagasaki), Mark I (Hiroshima) was a bullet type Atomic bomb where a subcritical projectile was accelerated at a subcritical target resulting in critical mass and the bomb would detonate
Fat Man, the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, works. However, Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, used a "gun style" mechanism that works by firing a small piece of uranium into a larger mass of uranium to produce the compression necessary to achieve fission.
Oh, so that's how implosion explosions work I've been trying to understand how supernova's ause a star to lose 75% of their mass yet the only way I could imagine that is a collapse to the core itself, though now I better realize that it's like who knows how much nuclear bombs going off
What my main question is, is that when Uranium reacts in this way it becomes the previous element in the periodic table until it reaches Lead...however what happens in Hydrogen bombs since there is no previous element and since matter cant be destroyed. Can anyone tell me this?
If I *saw* the bomb coming I wouldn't hide because the radiation is a painful way to die I'd try to get as close to the blast as possible so I could die instantly
We Knew That The World Would Not Be The Same, Few People Laughed, Few People Cried, Most People Were Slient,Now I Have Become Death, Destroyer Of Worlds.
It still shocks me when scientists told the American generals/govt that the atom bomb could possibly IGNITE THE ATMOSPHERE ON FIRE, they still used it...
Small price to pay
@@noelighedo4923 ...for salvation
We are close to achieving that goal nowadays.
It was that or the nazis would have used it and continued using it without any kind of restraint. That fact in itself is the only reason Einstein lent his expertise to the project. Oppenheimer appealed to him in essence guilting him into it by pulling the “you being a German Jew yourself, you can’t take the risk of the nazis getting this technology first.” The second time he was asked as the first time he was approached he flatly declined because he wanted no part of creating a weapon capable of killin everyone on the planet. Shortly after he is quoted as saying “I know not what the weapons of World War III will be, but the weapons of WW4 will most definitely be sticks and rocks”
@@michaelthemadsoldiertist the ptsd that come with knowing you killed million of people with your invention is a terrifying one
Thank you for explaining this to me. Now i can finally start building one in my backyard.
Just let me know when you are done soo I can build one after pal
@@youtubebossman8475 Lets built one together and split the cost 50/50 but I get to pick wich country we blow up since it was my idea.
After building one let's test it on North Korea 👍
I would recommend a hydrogen bomb instead of just a normal nuke
Yeah have fun with that dhs interview. Don’t worry once they clear you as an actual threat they’re pretty polite.
"Kaboom?"
"Yes rico, kaboom"
Actually it's Rico, but whatever
Do you meam rico?
@@cringeromnui2812Did you mean “mean?”
Just smile and wave boys. 😅
Smile and wave
"Atom prices driving you up the wall?"
" *I'LL CUT IT IN HA-* "
Ayyyyyy i know that reference
Ive seen thiss but cant remember where
@@fallhuman7226 psssssst it's found in apple seeds....
😅
Cyanide and happyness, @@fallhuman7226
It goes *"BOOM"* that's how it works!
Ikr? All These people do is just lie
I thought it was sploosh
It goes boom and also boom i guess
This design is mostly used in plutonium bombs but a different gun method is used for uranium
@@brett4264 it’s a bot ignore it so people stop using bots to troll
You mean a revolver-type uranium bomb, where you smash a bit of uranium against another, creating a critical mass.
Uranium can be used in implosion or gun types. Plutonium can only really be used in implosion weapons.
Most weapons are implosion types. Most weapons are plutonium fueled.
There have been several uranium implosion weapons.
@@GrimpakTheMook It's called the gun type, not revolver type.
@@Evan_Bell oh... Thank you for the correction.
Do Hydrogen bomb also , like the TSAR bomb which was like USSR's most destructive weapon....
@I am Instagram BB x2 U make utter garbage
Not quite, heck this is a very simplistic description of a nuclear initiation. A hydrogen bomb uses an atomic device to initiate hydrogen fusion so the first stage would work
@@crwydryny But If is drop from some thing through sky it produce mega tonnes of explosives.
The tsar bomba is the most destructive weapon in history
@@oscargrey4416 let’s be honest today Russia stands powerful due to its nuclear Arsenal otherwise Russia would have broke in more parts and USA would have destroy Russia.Russia alliance with China make it more powerful and stand it tall like superpower as China has potential of future superpower
It still blows my mind we have these weapons. Yet can’t cure certain diseases. When you study or read about these weapons it feels like Star Wars.
Neither can we feed and house our citizens
The government knows you can heal any disease. You can your SBM to heal yourself too. Disease is a profitable business
Money, why cure people, keep them buying your pills, why make peace, when you make money from war.
Oh we can cure plenty of diseases…but there is too much money in treatment for these diseases. Curing them wouldn’t be profitable.
we can actually, but that research gets stopped to keep big pharma business booming while normies like you do nothing about it
The result is alot like the morning after Taco Bell. There's a loud noise followed by cries and absolute horror at the point of impact
Shiggi!
Your not funny bro
@@carlosandresjuarez2274 Cry I thought it was funny
Who’s ready to see Oppenheimer ?
Imma appreciate the animator, it's so smooth
I learnt this in science yesterday, my teacher says it is because of the energy released when splitting the uranium atoms by shooting neutrons at it whoch creates even more neutrons because when uranium splits it releases three more neutrons
“Patrolling the Mojave almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter”
Who else thought of the strongest battlegrounds when they saw the atom cut in half
“Ima go prank John.”
Did u prank him?
@@60percentpuredits I did but I don’t know where he went I guess he didn’t like the prank 😔
@@randomv1nce453 It has been 5 months. You found him?
“Guys the atmosphere is on fire” 🗿
It is important to note, the Little Boy Bomb was never tested like the Fat Man Bomb which used Plutonium 239, whereas Little Boy used Uranium 235. Oppenheimer and his team were so confident in the Little Boy design it was never tested and it really wasn't proven until it was dropped on Hiroshima.
Uranium 235 is wayy easier to use.
@@Kalzu85how do you know that🤨
Thank you
This was very useful
Thanks this helped with my… “science project”
Cool! I was watching videos about atomic bombs yesterday
Next video: how to find Uranium-235
Thanks for the tutorial 😊
Thanks I’ll have to try this at home 😁
this is specifically for implosion type bombs which was only used in one of the two. But iT still accurate :) the other type of bomb used was a gun-type bomb which is less effective and require HEU rather than plutonium which is 3x more effective
Annnnd now I’m on a watch list.
Now? Dude, you've been on a watch list for a while. 😮
The first bomb dropped on Nagasaki was an implosion bomb composed of a sphere of explosives layered on a hollow sphere of plutonium 239 with a beryllium-polonium 220 core. When the explosives were detonated that forced the plutonium 239 sphere to compress into the beryllium-polonium 210 core causing the atoms of plutonium 239 to begin to split in a chain reaction causing other plutonium 239 atoms to split in a continuous exponential chain reaction resulting in a fission nuclear explosion.
The Hiroshima bomb was a gun type and used uranium 235 using conventional explosives to slam uranium 235 to stationary uranium 235 to trigger the fission Cain reaction.
Watching this before Oppenheimer.
Tom Clancys The Sum Of All Fears had a good definition of what happens.
Cant wait to show my classmates this
You still need to hit the sphere at the moment of critical mass with a neutron to start the atomic chain reaction.
Thanks for showing me how to make an atomic bomb...now I know what to do with the uranium in my shed 😃😃😃
FBI right now 👁👄👁
There’s another way nukes are made. Prototyped anyway. It was essentially a rod of radioactive material launched at high speed into a plate of similar radioactive material that causes a cascade upon impact similar reaction just not as effective. More fallout less boom if I remember correctly.
Gun type weapons. A few weapons of that type were stockpiled. They don't produce more fallout.
Hey, I have a question, do we literally have to broke just one atom to create this much energy or multiple atoms are broken?? If multiple atoms are broken for this much energy then how big of a explosion can we expect from one atom only?
crazy how particles so tiny can create an explosion that could vaporise an entire city. it reminds me of the big bang. it started with a matter the size of a pea which exploded, thus the universe as we know it was created.
Thanks for the tutorial mate! 🙃 👍
Hol up
Brilliant sound
Well I'm probably on some sort of watchlist now
Don't worry; how nuclear weapons work is somewhat common knowledge already (see Wikipedia). It's quite simple in theory, but not in practice. The difficult part utilizes thousands of centrifuges to isolate rare fissionable isotopes of uranium or plutonium. That's why only a few countries have a nuclear program.
we alllllllllllllllll arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre
Nuclear bomb❌
Nuclear "if you thought what j was thinking, were besties"✅
That's only how Fat Man worked (the one dropped over Nagasaki) Little Boy (the bomb dropped iver Hiroshima) used uranium in a gun-tyoe method, by using explosives to shoot 5 rings of uranium 235 into a uranium target, causing a similar chain reaction, but it's an explosion type bomb instead of implosion
They had to shoot the uranium rings at extremely high speeds in order for the reaction to occur
@@StarstruckChiroMusicNo.
@@Evan_Bell ?
@@StarstruckChiroMusic In order to sufficiently reduce the probability of predetonation, not in order to initiate the reaction.
I'm so early that I can literally feel the shockwave of the Kaboom!
@I am Instagram BB x2 this bot is everywhere and now its in one of my favorite yt channels, how long are you gonna be keeping this up?
also yes im trying to talk to the bot incase theres a person monitoring it
@@Noober_0 replying to it fuels it
Can you make a video with its crafting recipe, please? It's for a school project 😏
There are two methods of making a nuclear bomb. One with Uranium, the other with Plutonium. The mechanics of the bomb with uranium is easier but difficult to collect enough U235 to make a viable bomb. But plutonium based bombs don't need as much to produce the same yield because the mechanics of it use implosion techniques which is more difficult to make. Notice how there is a tradeoff and you can tell which is more favorable by countries.
Crazy how we thought atoms could never be split until some smart guy built an atomic bomb
The little boy had a different mechanism. It had a uranium cone slam into a bigger uranium block through a barrel, like a gun almost so then the unstable particles hit the atom and split them.
Imagine explaining to a soldier from the 1300s that in the future warfare weapons go from the swords, Sheilds arrows and stakes with horses that they are used to to tanks, jets, bombs, heat seaking missiles, intercontinental missiles, drones and nuclear bombs. They would clearly just see that well the world will end because of those things. And it will
8th of augaust not the 9th.
but keep up the awesome work
“It’s just a prank bro”
The prank
video: Atomic bomb
Subtitle: Vitamilk milk
Here After Watching "Oppenheimer"
So that’s why plankton blew up after breaking the atom in half.
So if you take that metal from inside the bomb it's basically don't do nothing
It's not the bomb that's terrifying, but the people who use it.
VERY INTERESTANT
This was almost 77 YEARS ago.
Think if what we have now...
Uranium fever has done and got me down!
Well this is a very simplified explanation of how the earliest bombs worked. There are a few other methods too.
Tungsten is never used as a hydrodynamic tamper in implosion weapons.
And "it normally contains a small sample of uranium or plutonium"? No, it always contains fissile fuel. That's what's actually exploding.
they should do a series on most evil dictators
The fision process 💀
When the radtion sound effect doesnt stop when you pause
"too close?" The bomb literally destroys everything kilometers away
I already know how this works
"So that's what happened to the bomb we dropped 😅"
Actually, that is only how the Gadget (trinity test) and Mark II (Nagasaki), Mark I (Hiroshima) was a bullet type Atomic bomb where a subcritical projectile was accelerated at a subcritical target resulting in critical mass and the bomb would detonate
Use Powder Toy to create one of these Atomic explosion. It's a good simulation game that is free. Better in PC or Laptops than on mobile.
This bomb has made Indonesia 🇮🇩 got it's independence from Japan 🇯🇵 in August 1945... the name of the bomb is "the little boy"
That sounds like A radiation from fallout 4.
"bro it's just a prank"
the prank:
How can I get my hands on these materials? Such as iridium.
Thank you
And this is correct!
I learned so much in 42 seconds.
Both energy n heat!
Shadow Wizard Money Gang
THE SUBTITLESSSS
Atomic Bomb is like a nuke OR a Grenade but more advanced
An atomic bomb is a type of nuke..
And nukes and grenades are quite different.
So it's an explosion that sets off an explosion
being 5x hotter than the sun's core in the center of explosion
Nuclear bombs are so funny!
I want to make one
We can made things that can clear a whole islands in probably about 5 hours buh we can't find some people lost in sub 🙄
Japan was historically know as “The land of the rising sun”
thats why theres urban legends in japan
"Napoleon there is nothing we can do"
Fat Man, the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, works. However, Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, used a "gun style" mechanism that works by firing a small piece of uranium into a larger mass of uranium to produce the compression necessary to achieve fission.
The projectile accounted for the majority of the fuel mass.
Gun assembly also doesn't result in any meaningful compression.
Ok time to make one
Oh, so that's how implosion explosions work
I've been trying to understand how supernova's ause a star to lose 75% of their mass yet the only way I could imagine that is a collapse to the core itself, though now I better realize that it's like who knows how much nuclear bombs going off
What my main question is, is that when Uranium reacts in this way it becomes the previous element in the periodic table until it reaches Lead...however what happens in Hydrogen bombs since there is no previous element and since matter cant be destroyed. Can anyone tell me this?
Fission does not convert uranium to lead. Decay does.
In hydrogen bombs, hydrogen is transmuted into helium.
@@Evan_Bell Ahhh i see, thanks bro
Thank you for telling us how to craft an atomic bomb
it goes boom ig
Infographics cashing in on the new youtube shorts, huh?
Kim jung un wants to see your location
If I *saw* the bomb coming I wouldn't hide because the radiation is a painful way to die I'd try to get as close to the blast as possible so I could die instantly
Don't be in Afghanistan anytime soon and no it won't come from America.
How can I get my hands on these materials such as iradium & tungsten? Would be using them for something else just curious.
The Tsar Bomba from Soviet union: ???
We Knew That The World Would Not Be The Same, Few People Laughed, Few People Cried, Most People Were Slient,Now I Have Become Death, Destroyer Of Worlds.
Why did i watch this i feel like the FBI is watching me now
Now just a completely unrelated question, what equipment is used?
*pulls out notepad*
It's the plutonium model
I wish this thing was never invented.....we as a species can survive without this.
So anyone now where I can find some uranium or plutonium
Your garden, sea water, ebay..
Great now were gonna see prank yt videos of people using these at local walmart.