Nate Silver explains why elections are so close

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • "The public intellectuals and the pundits are more partisan than the voters. They're the ones who enforce partisan orthodoxy,"' argues Nate Silver.
    Watch the full episode of The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie featuring Nate Silver here: • Libertarians are the r... .
    Subscribe to The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie
    TH-cam: • The Reason Interview W...
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Apple: podcasts.apple...

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @TheAntiSmug
    @TheAntiSmug 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The illusion is more exciting when it's close.

  • @Nurdaholic
    @Nurdaholic 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    lack of participation. This isn’t difficult.
    Move election day to saturday or make election day on Tuesday a mandatory day off from most businesses.

    • @99guspuppet8
      @99guspuppet8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ voting should be tied to getting free pizza …… or cookies and milk …… let’s all go to Sugar rock Candy Mountain

    • @catmonarchist8920
      @catmonarchist8920 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@99guspuppet8like the democracy sausages in Australia

    • @23wtb
      @23wtb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Good lord but this is thick. If anything we suffer from far too much participation in elections.

    • @99guspuppet8
      @99guspuppet8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@23wtb ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ you are correct

    • @thespeez
      @thespeez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Election Day should be a national holiday!!!

  • @jasonsworld333
    @jasonsworld333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Answer: cheating

  • @SM-pv4sn
    @SM-pv4sn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    When he says he sees 'social utility' in journalism, that's just a round-about way to say 'some people value being informed on current events and investigations'. Problem with the legacy media is they fulfill neither function anymore. In their desperate efforts to keep revenues up while faced with the internet and to keep sponsors happy (both non-state and state), they've relied increasingly on yellow journalism. As quality continues to decline, the viewership declines, perpetuating the death spiral.
    The silver lining is that as an obsolete industry model goes away, the need they used to fill doesn't, and entrepreneurs are always working to fill the needs of others. There's a lot of turmoil we death with due to misinformation from the legacy media now though, we're in a transition phase.

  • @missano3856
    @missano3856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Because both parties want to be just popular enough to do all the unpopular shit that is actuall their animating purpose.

  • @dgk4268
    @dgk4268 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It shouldn't be

  • @ninehaze
    @ninehaze หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nate Silver should explain why he’s pushing the agenda of Peter Thiel.

  • @bluesky6985
    @bluesky6985 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Elections are close because Dominion is counting the votes 😊

  • @innovativeprogramschool7979
    @innovativeprogramschool7979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both Candidates suck so many people are undecided 😢

  • @richdobbs6595
    @richdobbs6595 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess that the parties are going as far to the extremes as they can without losing so much of the middle that they can't be elected. If most of the populace feel the same, then you've got essentially a uni-party.

  • @ThinkTwice2222
    @ThinkTwice2222 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He lost me when he thought Hillary was gonna win

  • @Scoots1994
    @Scoots1994 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Dems and Republicans can merge since they are essentially on the same team anyhow. We need a new party that actually represents what most of us want.

    • @mikeemerson1091
      @mikeemerson1091 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are so right. A new party that focuses on the common man, not giant corporations, the ultra rich or other countries. A party that will push term limits and an end to lobbyists and citizens united.

    • @Scoots1994
      @Scoots1994 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mikeemerson1091 The Citizens United decision makes some sense if the context even as the justices said it was not good but it was constitutional. The problem is the first amendment in that one ... how do you have free speech AND do away with money in politics?

    • @thespeez
      @thespeez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We should consider getting rid of political parties.

    • @Scoots1994
      @Scoots1994 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thespeez Do any countries that are not dictatorships have no political parties? I don't think we can get rid of all parties ... I just want the people running things now to be gone.

    • @thespeez
      @thespeez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Scoots1994the US didn't have political parties for the first two elections of its existence.

  • @benjamindover4337
    @benjamindover4337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Marketing never spends more than it has to. That's why the election is always 50/50. If it were 51/49, then they spent too much money. So it will always be 50/50 by virtue of marketing budget discipline. It really is a matter of marketing dollars. You could overcome 50/50, but why would you do that?

  • @harmony9591
    @harmony9591 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He is a very mean-spirited man not overly fond of the truth...down with Nate Silver!