AUSA 2017: Flexible weapons integration on the Oshkosh JLTV

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @oldpain7625
    @oldpain7625 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God damn, that thing looks just about perfect in my eyes. Especially the one with the 30mm remote cannon and a freaking laser beam.

  • @jeromeavila3195
    @jeromeavila3195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome vehicle and weapon systems!

  • @TeraQuad
    @TeraQuad 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SOOOOOOOOO AWESOME!!!!!

  • @ivi7017
    @ivi7017 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    so the payload of the utility variation is merely 1 ton ?

  • @ronniearciga8643
    @ronniearciga8643 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome...get it done. Make sure this sophisticated military vehicle will put in good hands. I mean, I want this is exclusive for American army and selected NATO members like British. Godspeed

  • @forrestdrake3444
    @forrestdrake3444 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I'm a small African dictator looking for something for the kids.... I have a big family...

    • @clydeceniza2521
      @clydeceniza2521 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      forrest drake 😂😂😂😂

    • @-whatever-
      @-whatever- 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How small are you? Can you fit in a shoe box?

  • @paulleepoy8039
    @paulleepoy8039 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the labels on the vehicles,they ruin the enemy with their names !

  • @twanabaiz9516
    @twanabaiz9516 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like hommve better than oshkosh because hommve lower than oshkosh and that making hommve less visible for ATGMs

  • @RednerKlallamStrong
    @RednerKlallamStrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should have a armor vehicle that has a load of hell Fire missiles on the back of it . something like a 10 pack hell fire missile system ? Whatever ! Lol or more ! . then put more on armor Stryker vehicles ? Maybe . I'm just saying I have a feeling there gonna want a vehicle that has more missiles on it . not this 2 to 4 little buddy systems

  • @freebird7218
    @freebird7218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enforcement Droid series 209)

  • @belesariius
    @belesariius 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clearly the US army hasn't been watching what the Houthi's are doing to Oshkosh vehicles with their ATGM in Yemen. I wouldn't sit in one of them if you paid me. As for the Hellfire unit on the side of that package, I can just see what a half way decent sniper would focus (and giggle) on ...

    • @parusol235
      @parusol235 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don’t think landing a round into a Hellfire missile would result in it exploding, besides the SHORAD variant is meant to stay relatively behind the frontlines to engage low level aircraft

    • @mike41457
      @mike41457 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you just say that a ATGM a (ANTI-TANK guided missile) might destroy a lightly armored JLTV is a possibility, no way dude. Its almost like ATGM that are used to disable or kill tanks are able to destroy a lightly armored vehicles.

    • @belesariius
      @belesariius 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mike41457 I know right ? it's almost as if you can't write this stuff

  • @wjh3023
    @wjh3023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    就是它啦…復仇者的接班人!

  • @edgarcardenas837
    @edgarcardenas837 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    #$$# tony stark iron man $##$ usa the one millitary nike23 sb ca 805

  • @baremetalmafia
    @baremetalmafia 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The reality is you can pretty much just bolt on any self contained weapons system onto a truck. Just look at any other combat egagement in history. This is nothing new.

    • @chevalier115
      @chevalier115 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      so long as said truck isn't some thin tin can then yeah pretty much.

    • @jaystol7988
      @jaystol7988 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      because hustory

    • @armchairgeneral7557
      @armchairgeneral7557 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A truck can’t withstand a roadside bomb like this can. If you bolt on an armored cab, then you have to replace the shocks to standup that weight. Oh now, that weight needs more horsepower to haul the truck and whatever it is towing. So, you are not factoring in a lot important details.