Cournot Competition | Microeconomics by Game Theory 101

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @Jaylevation
    @Jaylevation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    0:57: In *Stackelberg* competition we have sequential moves.

  • @doomsvile
    @doomsvile 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Hands down the best game theory content on the internet. Thanks a million for this!! - If anyone hasn't checked out his book, I guarantee you won't find game theory more simplified anywhere.

  • @noel5283
    @noel5283 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The class material didn't help me to understand this concept, neither did my professor, other youtube videos or any other source of information. You sir, are a legend! Thank you!

    • @15yearoldogi
      @15yearoldogi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Neither did Business degree from University, Economicst = empty-headed.

  • @Asw_2004
    @Asw_2004 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please solve: A variant of this example was first introduced by Augustin Cournot (1838). Two
    identical firms, players 1 and 2, produce some good. Assume that there are no fixed
    costs of production, and let the variable cost to each firm i of producing quantity
    qi ≥ 0 be given by the cost function, ci
    (qi
    ) = q
    2
    i
    for i ∈ {1, 2}. Demand is given by
    the function q = 100 − p, where q = q1 + q2
    .

  • @alexcerny5881
    @alexcerny5881 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This also means q_1 = (a - 2c_1 + c_2) / 3

  • @realFriedrichHayek
    @realFriedrichHayek 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    damn bro... I wish I had this for my exam last month :(

  • @vanessahili1074
    @vanessahili1074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good video. It would be great if you could do some actual working examples

  • @rationalagent6927
    @rationalagent6927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking forward to this new series thanks for taking the time to make these

  • @drsu5638
    @drsu5638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this, very helpful supplement to lectures!

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cournot? More like “Cool, yo!”, because I think this stuff is really neat. Thanks for making all these videos!

  • @silverkobo
    @silverkobo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing, thank you

  • @glebsokolov6524
    @glebsokolov6524 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! You are the best !

  • @rebekahfrogoso5326
    @rebekahfrogoso5326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this! Can you also go over the Bertrand’s Model please?

    • @Gametheory101
      @Gametheory101  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep, plan is to do that after Stackelberg.

    • @rebekahfrogoso5326
      @rebekahfrogoso5326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looking forward to it! Sorry just a question, let's say there's a capacity constraint of F=20 and the NE without the capacity constraint is (24,18). In the case of F=20, do I consider firm 1 to produce 20 instead of 24 and plug it in firm 2's best response function to find the new NE with the constraint?

    • @Gametheory101
      @Gametheory101  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rebekahfrogoso5326 That will probably get you to the right answer, but you should double check that firm 1 wants to produce 20 given that firm 2 is playing its best response to firm 1 producing 20.

  • @revimfadli4666
    @revimfadli4666 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if they don't know each other's marginal costs?

  • @marzoukiahlem6206
    @marzoukiahlem6206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it possible to understand all game theories exist in microeconomics in 4 days I'm going to lose my master degree if I dont pass it

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dang it sounds like things came down to the wire, and I hope they went well. How did things turn out?

    • @brandonwalker6069
      @brandonwalker6069 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PunmasterSTP If their comment was true and they were starting with no understanding of game theory then they almost certainly failed their qual exam.

    • @PunmasterSTP
      @PunmasterSTP 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@brandonwalker6069 That was my hunch, but I was still curious. I've made something of a habit of replying to old comments that mention an upcoming (for the time) event. It's led to some cool conversations, and hopefully it drives up engagement on the videos.