Alright, here's something I've been thinking about. why is it ONLY humans that the "evidence" shows us? Why do we never find Elephants, Giraffes, Antelopes, Lions, or Zebras? Apparently, it was ONLY humans that existed alongside dinosaurs. It's not like other animals just don't leave footprints. People only find "Humans" instead of other modern day animals. That alone makes me think that this whole thing is stupid and untrue.
Mammals would be eaten if they were close to dinosaurs, they would stay away from them. Humans would be hunting Dino's if they were the only source of food humans could find.
that's because we are still using the stupid European science that white is right. there's hundreds upon hundreds of artifacts that are made by humans that are over 300 million years old. think why science doesn't want you to know about this. it's because of the Catholic Church. keeping people stupid is a way of controlling them
Once, when I was a kid, I found a bunch of footprint-like marks in the woods, and I followed them, thinking I was tracking Bigfoot. Looking back, I feel kind of stupid.
Death Hunter 101 It's already been stale since a lot of people here use the same joke a million times. They even will get easily pissed off if you tell them the truth. Once you've told them that meme is stale (which still is), they'll flip their shit, throw insults & cuss out at you like you broke into their house & take their Playstation (any kind) from them & sell it on eBay for only $260.95.
Only a couple of creationists believe the dinosaurs are fake...I think that they come up with that theory because of the way paleontologists have been rather decietful about things and the way they keep changing what the may of looked like and that all fossils in museums are not the real fossil on display ....I personally believe dinosaurs are real but not as old as 65 million years
@@perrysaker1526 what do you mean "palaeontologists have been deceitful"? No-one has ever denied that reconstructions are the best estimate based on what is known at the time, and change as new evidence is found. Nor has anyone ever denied that the skeletons on display in museums are often casts, because the real ones are too fragile or valuable to put out. And what evidence do you have that the accepted ages are wrong?
@@wms72 If Soros is funding people to put a greater body of evidence together and challenge cherry-picked assumptions, then Soros' work is a good thing. This wasn't funded by Soros, but if it were, that would mean he's spending his money on good things.
Thanks, Trey. I first came across these prints, as a very immature young Christian. in a fundamentalist book. Now I knew a bit about geology, and even then something that so defied reason and a fairly well proven time line looked sus. All the more so because, to me, the photo looked as if the 'human' print had been enhanced with chalk....... In later life I met a motor trader who also knew that trick, for a not too dissimilar reason. Fifty years on, and I'm still a Christian believer, but have learned to be very sceptical about people who are too dogmatic. Sadly there is no way that you will convince those who simply do not want to see. (I don't even bother with anything that comes out of the US Bible Belt any more.)
It is the same of people claiming to have photo evidence of 20 foot human skeletal fossils being found.They are fake.Even Christians must be rational and careful in their approach to alleged evidence.It makes for a better believer.
*If you are Christian as I am* and if you've been *following evolution and following creationism with an open real scientific mind* (I have), then you know that this footprint is the least and most insignificant of a huge chain of contradictions and impossibilities exposed about the *"never proven theory of evolution-religion."* *I invite you to START reading and listening* every single scientific article and to every single dissertation given by Creationist scientists, researchers and scholars. Listen to the evidence side by side, study it, save it, collect it, compare it, analyze possible flaws, and strong areas. *Second my Christian brother.* Being Christian is not an ID we received at birth, it doesn't do any good to ourselves or to advance our Creator's agenda. *"You're not skeptical because you don't believe."* You're skeptical because *a group of non-believers with the illusion of getting rid of God's moral laws in their lives have been feeding all of us with incomplete arguments in the name of science,* (and the government made into the law) At the beginning it sounded right, though unproven. Over the years it's been crumbling down for the lack of evidence. Now, we know that an All knowing God is the source of knowledge and wisdom, and a Growing number of Creationist scientists have been working and rediscovering TRUTHS that had been in front of our eyes all along. *Don't forget that the Bible is the Word of God.* If still can't understand why, do not initiate debate about it. By experience, my advice is, (as a believer as well), *ENGAGE* into extreme search mode, and if possible *become an APOLOGIST.* *You will not regret it,* because God hates religion as much as he hates indoctrination of any kind, churches, religions, scientific indoctrinations. They all require a negative faith. *But focus on the SPIRITUAL Book.* Because being Christian is getting closer and closer to *Jesus Christ, your Lord, Savior and Creator.* *You're Christian; you have something of a great value that transcend eternity.* *God Bless you and your family!*
@@principleswise9749 I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure evolution is not crumbling as you say. Most scientists are confident in the evolutionary model because it actually has both predictive and explanatory power, unlike creationist models, which mostly offer ad hoc explanations of things. It's simply a matter of practicality. Evolution actually works and creationism doesn't (or has yet to). It is entirely possible that the world was really created recently, but at this time the world instead appears very very old. Perhaps your god made the world look older than it is for some reason, but we can't just assume that is true with the evidence at hand.
@@scottdemarest9315 bruh evolution has ZERO scientific proof. First of a it's scientific law that life cannot come from non life. It's a scientific law that no new material can be created. Also the amino acid actually would have killed life, not make it. Also Evolution justifies Rasicm, colonization, and conquest.
@@helloworld7222 You seem to be confusing evolution and abiogenesis. Evolution just describes how life changes over time, not how it started. I do not know how life started, nor does anyone else with any certainty. You say zero scientific proof. That is a pretty hefty claim, unless you believe all the scientists are in on some conspiracy. A scientific theory doesn't tell you how to act. It just tell you how the physical world works. Some people will find any excuse to mistreat their fellow man and evolution is just one of many kinds of excuses people have used over time. If you need proof of this, consider that people have been colonizing and racially discriminating long before evolution was even thought of.
You are predisposed to believe what you already want ro believe. Human and dinosaur footprints being found and fossilized in THE SAME MUD BED, means nothing to someone who doesnt want to acknowledge real OBSERVABLE SCIENCE.
@@josiahgil By the same logic, if you are dead set on believing there are human footprints fossilised along dinosaur tracks, no amount of evidence will get you to change your mind. It just goes nowhere.
@@osvaldocortes4598 what about the fact that all around the world there are giant foot prints in bedrock with five distinct toes? what about the fact that dinosaur soft tissue has been found, which proves that dinosaurs could not have lived an impossibly colossal "65 million years ago"? what about the fact that there are cultures all around the world that depict certain "dragons" in nearly the exact same way from china the mexico to greece to isreal to norway? What about the fact that the ica stones in peru shows triceratops dinosaurs with poka dot skin, and how just a few years ago scientists discovered triceratops skin for the first time, wich had poka dot skin patterns? How do evolutionists keep avoiding the nail in the coffin of your demonstrably false paradigm? If the evidence doesnt fit your paradigm, you say 'm" "well aperantly soft dinosaur tissue can survive 65 million years" It will mever occur to evolutionists to examin their methods which have been proven to not work.
In the two photos of -3b and "destroyed -3b" I can't even, for the life of me identify one common crack, spot, or line or anything suggesting that they are photos of the same rock.
Yeah and thats because different lighting, editing techniques, and cameras can completely change the appearance of a complex rock face up close like that.
MixMachine HD is this joke still going. I don't mind if it is it's just that the last time I referenced it I got completely shat on by a million people. Man I felt lame
@@rimavet8485 Uhhh, not exactly true, I just wanted to see how the subject was going to be handled. Fact is that there are people who aren't necessarily creationists or evolutionist who accept the possibility that dinosaurs and humans co-existed. Simply because not enough of the very distant past has been preserved or RECOGNIZED. Much less "discovered". It doesn't have anything to do with ancient astronauts or time traveling either. So much is just plain gone.lol
@@KC______ Every respectable or legitimate archaeologist or paleontologist will tell you that humans and non-avian dinosaurs never once coexisted. There is simply no non-fabricated evidence to suggest otherwise. No carbon dating, no legitimate footprints, no fossils depicting their coexistence; absolute squat. There's just nothing.
Gustavo Perez There already are people who believe the Earth is flat. There are also people who believe that the Earth was created last Thursday and that everything that happened before last Thursday is just an illusion.
Stefan B. No shit- that was the point of the post. It’s a hypothetical hyperbolic statement of “it can’t get any worse, right?” and applied to stupid people. The kind that think dinosaurs and man coexisted, the earth was flat, and those that can’t detect simple jokes.
The "human footprints" look a whole lot like what TH-camr Quinton Reviews explained when discussing history channel documentaries, where someone was told there were three people in a grainy photo taken of JFK's assassination and suddenly they could identify two figures that weren't there before. Suggestion is a powerful thing, and when your brain wants to find something, it's very good at finding that thing.
And I oop- I live in glen rose. My bio teacher tried to use the foot prints as the justification for telling us that humans lived along side dinosaurs. Smh
Interesting that the 'human' footprints are modelled on habitually shoe-wearing footprints. People who live barefoot have more splayed, separate-toed footprints. So they coexisted with dinosaurs, wore shoes, but took them off for some reason.
@@MrEpeeFencer and that's the difference between empirical and anecdotal evidence. A classic differentiator between shoe-wearers and barefoot people is the distance between the toes.
I've seen the tracks in Glen Rose, and worked at the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, where a Paluxysaurus jonesi skeleton is on display. Unfortunately, it was rather common for children to interrupt me when I said the fossil was over 100 million years old, to argue that the world was actually only a few thousand years old. SMH..
@Don't Eat Animals Before shooting off your mouth, you really should do serious research. The odds of evolution forming a functioning cell is 10 to the 35 power. That just happens to be greater odds then all of the stars in the UNIVERSE! You would have a better chance of taking all of the pre-maid parts from a fine Swiss watch, throwing them into the air, and have them come down into a working, functioning watch with the correct time. Just the way that DNA has to fold inside of a cell to make it work, is something evolutionists avoid like the plague! Bye the way, I hate vegans! Vegans eat my food. Vegans eat the food that my food eats!
You missed one important point - the "human" footprints go deeper than the dinosaur ones, which would mean the supposed human had a greater foot pressure than the dinosaurs
Logically speaking the human tracks could be older, however even if we found proof humans and dinosaurs undoubtedly existed together this would still be unlikely
Pressure = force per unit area. Larger force from dinosaur weight is supported by larger foot area in the mud. I haven’t worked out the math to compare the psi of the ornithomimus foot compared to the human foot for average human weight, but larger force doesn’t necessarily mean larger pressure.
@@legendaryxenozilla9061 I suppose if the tracks were made in clay, and then got covered in a different material, say very different composition to clay, perhaps the material over the top of the footprints in clay wouldn't form such a tough rock as the clay when compressed over time so would erode away leaving the tracks maybe? Something like that?
It's a bit like that "face" on Mars. Which is only a face if seen on a blurry photo with light from a specific direction and not at all at other times. :P Stupid light, trying to deceive us! Edit: Oh, he used that photo too. XD Note to self... don't comment before the video is ended. :P
:) My parents took me there in the 80s when I was a kid. They loved vacationing in Texas, loved making trips educational and I loved dinosaurs, so that trip was particularly exciting for me. Edit: Having watched to the end, we went there probably ‘86 or ‘87 and yeah, definitely never saw anything resembling human footprints, so at least a year or two before they claimed the supposed prints were destroyed.
@@NecrochildK Video evidence shows it happened. One day the prints are there the next day just unrecognizable depressions in the sandstone. That was 40 years ago I believe so they would be worn smooth via erosion now.
@@johnglad5 I've seen videos on it before, and no, there never were any. It was some people having a big case of apophenia. Seeing patterns that aren't there. Like the face on Mars. As for 40 years ago, I visited the site with my parents about 35 or more years ago. It wouldn't have been worn down smooth back then already if it had just been chipped away in recent years at the time.
@@NecrochildK Well I haven't been there. I've seen right left tracks 14 in a row I believe. Some of the prints overlapped (stepped into) a series of Dino tracks. One or two of the tracks could not be mistaken for anything but human. Carl Baugh on an archaelogical dig for his thesis dug out human prints from underneath slabs of limestone. All of it documented. Just sayin. PTL
I can imagine a Acrocanthosaurus hunting a flock of ornithomimids at that time. However they would say that humans ride on the ornithomimids... I think thats how you spell the family group.
Lmao... Why would any ancient human put their foot directly inside the dinosaur tracks??? To my knowledge hunters don’t directly walk inside the tracks.
Eypick good hunters will step where another hunter has stepped or in its preys tracks to limit noises mad because anything that could make noise had been compressed or broke already, you’re welcome for the hunting tips
We do. I hunt, and will use say the deers trail depending on different factors, such as snow or mud, it’s easier to walk in a path already created then make one yourself or even leaves,leaves are loud to walk on, but not if they have been flattened before you. Hunters use already established animal trails a lot aswell because they pick the best routes usually and are free of things that make noise.
The lengths people will go to deamonize others who provide evidence. Also I never knew about dinosaurs walking on their soles, can we get more info on that?
I feel really bad for Kuban. He seems like a good guy that just likes fossils a lot and these creationists go all torches and pitchforks on him. Yeah, theropods can walk on their metatarsals in the same sense we can walk on our tip toes. www.researchgate.net/publication/305177688_Crouching_theropod_at_the_seaside_Matching_footprints_with_metatarsal_impressions_and_theropod_authopods_a_morphometric_approach
After looking at it for awhile it Does kinda look like a foot but I think that's just me trying to look for a pattern. Also I messed with the lighting a bit and it look more human like further proving that lighting can really change a photo
i've been there personally... they are more convincing then they are in the pictures. infact if you go there there are literal signs there making fun of the prints saying "dinosaurs wore human foot print shoes" obviously jokes... there are also Obvious chisel marks on only the toes... there are eye witnesses and signs even in the park saying that people have tried to chisel the toes off so people dont think they are human... people tried to cover it up..
@@thesavior2398 The thing I can't get over is why would ancient humans walk exactly where the dinosaurs did? And why is their gait the same as dinosaurs the were quite a bit bigger than them? That's like when you were a kid and you walked exactly in your father's footprints but because he was so much taller than you, you had to take slow, uncomfortable, silly, wide steps. That's what the ancient humans would have to do if they made those prints. Walk around like blithering idiots.
@@The_Big_Jay well i suggest you go there for your self before judging... the fact that there are human footprints there is clear as day... as far as the gate size. that's an understandable question. and does take a bit of believe in it first to start to understand the reason. theirs a museum there in glen rose TX. they put live animals from birth into a higher pressure atmospheric tank with a larger proportion of oxygen then we see today... without fail these animals are seen to grow up to 2-3 times their normal natural size.... even fish are seen to grow larger in these chambers. my believe and their hypothesis is that the earth had a different atmosphere back then (even if you believe in "full" evolution (by the way even none evolutionist believe in adaption) its not far fetched to think there was a different atmospheric composition a long time ago... the hypothesis (and it is a hypothesis its not a for sure known fact) is that the humans may have grown taller in this more suitable atmosphere and therefore could have been tall enough to make such great strides. something like a average height of 7-8 feet but maybe more... there are many many known cases that ancient bug and animals were larger then the ones we see today... why would humans be any different if they were around that time? what makes us think they weren't? because a fancy rock scientist tells you how old a rock is??? go out and see for your self. make your on conclusion instead of listening to everyone else.
@@The_Big_Jay also thank you for commenting in a civilized manner! i implore you to come up with your own conclusions even if they are far different then my own. thank you for the civil conversation!
@@thesavior2398 Why haven't we found ANY fossils of 7-8 foot tall human, with feet that just so happen to match the size of a 5-6 foot tall man today? I feel like if they were made by 7-8 foot tall humans, the foot print wouldn't be the exact same size as ours today. Have you seen the world's tallest man? He suffers from a form of brain tumor that didn't let his body stop growing. I believe he is around the previously mentioned 7-8 feet tall and his feet are *massive* and almost twice as big as a normal man's foot. Also, let's say for the sake of arguement that the human's were 7-8 foot tall and existed, why would the walk exclusively in the footprints of dinosaurs? There are none on their own, always in a dinosaur print and always walking the same direction of the dinosaur.
What fascinates me is how those dinosaur trackways got preserved in the first place, rather than just eroding away. Could you explain this fossilisation process?
Hello - I find the main issue in this topic to be the unwillingness to investigate this manifest fantasy of the geologic column and age. The concept was developed by Charles Lyell specifically to take " Moses " ( creator ) out of the science. The man wasn't a scientist but a geologic hobbyist and lawyer. Later Darwin gravitated toward his concepts to bolster his Evolutionary/Natural selection theory which required vast amounts of time to justify the changes in species. Now 2 issues. 1. Lyell was FOC and admitted so in his personal writings. 2. Darwin's evolutionary theory is an epic fail and NOT supported factually by any quantifying science - it's just a faith based concept in the doctrine of materialism. So as far as Dino's go their is an astounding amount of potential evidence of dino's coexisting with mankind and one of the final nails has been the soft tissue found in over a hundred animals from various sights. Follow the money - 2 many grants and agendas to be justified, and an unwillingness to question the dogma of the "scientific" community. Simple as - Evolution was the main stay of " science " to contradict Intelligent design which generally focuses on a relatively recent creation event. Some very powerful folks will do anything to keep their mind control on the public and others Scientists/Universities operate on grants to support the agenda so they have boxed themselves in a corner defending a failed principle ( Evolutionary theory ) which depends entirely upon vast amounts of time to produce it's supposed results ( which are scientifically unproven ). Both sides have the exact same data but have chosen different avenues of explanation. 1 involves supernatural events the other only material events. BOTH require FAITH since science by it's nature cannot explain origins i.e. you can say all you want about common ancestor but they cannot explain the FIRST ( abiogenesis ) life form nor explain the bottleneck in genetics. Nor do they have ANY factual physical evidence of a species changing into another nor the fossil records to support that claim. Is what it is.
Oh man, that would be exhausting. Just watching Bill Nye debate him was insufferable. Ham is like talking to a brick wall... sometimes I wonder if he is for real or some kind of troll
Miguel Oros 😳 Why would you want such a non event to take place? With a person who is so deeply deluded that he is completely in denial of reality? A person who told Bill Nye that he would believe the bible over science? Why give this man any iota of ‘credibility’ in his eyes and those of his equally deluded followers? Really!
Lynn Troller it's like the "human" only walk on top of the dinosaur footprint, like, there's no human footprint beside the one on top of the dinosaur footprint.
Daniel Daniar Are you aware that with cameras rolling a machine was used to lift the riverbed and the tracks just keep on going? Regardless of who stepped on who’s is irrelevant. The fact is, they are together. There are more lesser known examples of human and dinosaur footprints found together that academia rather not discuss- it would turn their theories upside down and they’d be out of a job overnight.
Lynn Troller why is human live alongside dinosaur made the evolutions theory obsolete ? And i love how the creationist REFUSED to acknowledge the possible theory created by the evolutionist.
wow, I didn't know that some dinosaurs could be Plantagenet, I thought they all were digitgenet. I almost always learn something new on your videos, thanks.
Yeah bro, imma demolish this stone with the most suitable tool for the job, a metal rod, not you know, a sledgehammer or something like that, just a metal rod.
I had so many nightmares at the age of 7, when I first found out and started loving dinosaurs. In those nightmares I was always chased by a t-rex until I could find a small cave to hide in. And the cave was always just deep enough to keep the Rex from getting me. Imagine my flashbacks when I watched the Jurassic park Lost World for the first time! That waterfall scene that the people were trying to hide behind. My mom got tired of me crawling into her bed every time I had one of those nightmares (I kicked like a mule, she said). I think those nightmares came from watching those old movies where cave men fought dinosaurs.
It is also weird that the footprints are that of humans that grew up wearing shoes. Humanoids that have never worn shoes have substantially splayed toes.
Disappointed Turtle they're claiming it was a postosuchus. Which may not be too ridiculous considering the fact that most crocodilians today were around millions of years ago.
Humberto Martinez I don't think it's exactly a Postosuchus. In all reality it is probably a crocodile with a body type similar to that of Kaprosuchus or Quinkana. Not also does kaprosuchus come from a nearby country, but that body plan for crocodiles has gone extinct several times and reemerged several times as well throughout history. It's a body plan that just refuses to die
Shadlos you're right, it's probably convergent evolution. An interesting thing about this cryptid, is that when I saw interviews being conducted on the locals, the locals never held superstitious claims to it. They regarded is as simply another animal.
Humberto Martinez Not exactly. Although modern crocodile species resemble prehistoric ones in overall body shape, they are still new species with anatomical differences (Trey explained this well in his video about living fossils). The saltwater-crocodile for example is only about 4 million years old. Also modern crocodiles were able to survive because of their successful niche as amphibious predators, while many terrestrial ones like Postosuchus died out because they were outcompeted in their niche as terrestrial predators by dinosaurs and mammals.
I've been to Dinosaur Valley State Park, a few times. Some of the tracks do look like they might be human, but follow the track forward or back a few steps, and you can see that the tracks were definitely made by a three toed animal. The human resembling tracks, are just eroded is infilled.
Thanks so much for this in-depth video. I heard about the Paluxy prints in a book a long time ago, and was always curious, but I've never seen anything that goes into as much detail as you do. I liked how you showed all the photos so clearly, and also located them all on the map of all the dinosaur prints.
But there’s no way Hanna & Barbara (Hanna-Barbara, creators of Flintstones, Scooby Doo, etc) would’ve known that. They just made it because it’s funny, NOT because it’s a documentary
I once found some pretty old footprint in a beach in South Brazil. There used to be a huge dune above the footprints, but one year the winds changed, or the sea hit different and dune disappeared, revealing sand so compacted that I would not correct anybody who said that this was actually rock. The footprints were from humans, and amerindians are tought to have been in that region since 12000 years ago. I wouldn't gave it less than 100 years. I really wished I could bring an archaeologist with me to see this, but being close to sea they might have vanished already.
@@josephpostma1787 there are paleontological sites 200 meters away from the dunes in a mountain at seashore, some pretty old coral fossils. Crossing the beach north-south direction there is another mountain, an archeological site, where are some 6000-5000 years old paintings and circunferical stones used for sharpening blades. The civilization that used to live there, before being wiped out by migrant indians, were the sambaquis. I didn't made any contact to "authorities", first of all, the local archeologists are much more interested in searching the seabed to find sank ships, swords, guns and such things, than to take a look at some old footprint that could be just the age of our grand grandparents. If I had mineralogical knowledge, oh boy, that would have been some cool shit to study.
When stepping in mud, there’s lots of oozing, you don’t get pristine impressions. It’s human nature to let personal bias to become the only explanation, and discount what is plain to see.
It's good that you talk about these things in a fair, skeptical way. There's many interesting artifacts and what not that get misinterpreted by lunes and ignored by most of the scientific field. Most of the time with "unexplainable" artifacts, they're immediately dismissed, hidden away, and mostly forgotten until conspiracy theorists get their hands on them. When there's odd and unexplainable artifacts, even if they seem to challenge all we know, they should be presented before the world in hopes of finding an answer. At the very least, we should take them as a reminder to be skeptical of all we think we know. To keep thinking critically, that's what science is about.
I think so too. Too often people just write off these kind of things and don't even give them a chance. The problem is that there are people that actually believe in this kind of stuff and don't really know how to evaluate things skeptically. I think just dismissing it is not a good way to convince anyone. I couldn't agree more with your ideology. Nobody should be afraid of inquiry and science.
TREY the Explainer indeed. But the fact an uninformed public can be swayed into believing such things is a reason we should focus on these things and find an answer. Someone offering any form of answer is often listened to more than people who keep saying idk.
'During the 1930s and the Depression, Glen Rose residents made money by distilling moonshine and selling dinosaur fossils. Each fossil brought 15 to 30 dollars. When the supply ran low, George Adams just carved more, some with human footprints thrown in. My dad, Weldon Eakin, and my grandfather decided one day, I don’t know if it was to make money, or what, to start carving man tracks alongside the dinosaur tracks. They poured acid to make the fossils look like aged limestone.' Zana Douglas, Granddaughter of George Adams, original hoaxer of the Paluxy River dinosaur tracks, Glen Rose, Texas.
It's interesting that all of the tracks which "prove" humans coexisted with dinosaurs show either human tracks separate from dinosaur tracks, or human tracks on top of or inside dinosaur tracks. So they always show the dinosaur making tracks, and then the human coming along and making tracks at a later date. They have never found footprints of a human making tracks, and then a dinosaur coming along at a later date and making tracks on top of the human tracks. You would have thought they would have come up for some phoney baloney explanation as to why this is, but they just seem to have left that massive flaw in their argument wide open.
To clarify she was laying content in my lap with her eyes almost full closed then when he started talking she opened her eyes that were slited and had her ears pines back
NOW THIS IS A CHRISTMAS GIFT! I'll get to watching it after we're done dining. I have to say, you're one of my favourite content creators if not my #1, happy holidays Trey!
TREY the Explainer Have a great dinner night, hope you find a basking shark carcass under the tree! Looking forward to your work on 2018 as always, cheers!
I grew up and lived in Glen Rose for a long time and I still go to the town as I live nearby. I’ve seen these tracks before when I was around 8 with my dad. They are awesome to see in the summer when the riverbed is dry. I think another piece of evidence proving that the prints were inhuman is the vast size of them. My dad and I, who at that point believed that they were human footprints (and honestly I believed until I watched this video), were in awe when we put our own bare feet in some of the prints. Some of the prints (of which I only remember maybe 2 or 3) are massive compared to even an adult’s footprint. Funnily enough, Glen Rose also has a creationist museum on the way to Dinosaur Valley State Park where the prints are located. I have visited the museum a few times, one on a field trip when I was in private school and another with a friend after we graduated high school because we were bored. There’s definitely some cool stuff worth looking at there, but I wouldn’t take anything about dinosaurs at face value. Stick with the model of the Ark and the pottery from Israel. If you ever want to do another updated video on this, (as small of a chance that is lol), I would be glad to go out there and take some better images and videos of it. I’ve been looking for a reason to head back out there again.
Years ago there was a video about a person who was using a chipping hammer on some of the tracks he said he was cleaning them up for scientists to study WTF ? The person filming the video told him to stop , it looked like he was destroying evidence. willcarmichie maybe you could dig into that . I tried to find the video to post here but it's long gone i remember him showing a footprint that looked human like and then chipping out rock saying the actual footprint was deeper that sediment had covered the original , when he was finished it just looked like a chipped out hole in the ground.
If you dismissed those human footprints because of their size then thats a real shame, because there is plenty of evidence to prove that humans were much bigger than modern man is today. I challenge you to look up the many documentaries that prove that giants once lived on this planet, In every country. Just in America, alone, newspaper reports were common in the 19th and early 20th centuries that showed the discoveries of giant human skeletons found all over the place in the USA. You can read the actual articles and see the photographs taken at the time. It is really something to see.
Sweg893 - The Dinosaur Guy Oh C'mon; isn't he and ms. Krampus smile so adorable when they abduct unsuspecting (maybe) innocent-ish victims ? :) Btw Krampus looks more original like the *Pagan* Santa :D
Nothing in Particular Ah Common dude ! Isn't his and ms Krampus smile (adorable) with their crocodile like yellowish rotten 'teeth', full of terrorized people fearing for their dear lives, is super cute ? *Blame Germanic mythology; not me :P*
I'm Catholic, but I believe in evolution for the most part. And I find that one human set out of thousands of dinosaur tracks found is absolutely not evidence. Honestly, without even reading the halfway mark, it's probably just some other creature with large nails that made such deep embeds. I don't necessarily agree with the argument that since our feet dont fit, it isn't a human cast. If evolution is the topic at hand, such an argument could be used against that. Maybe comparing the feet of our ancestors would be more accurate of an argument.
Have you ever done, or would you ever consider doing a video about the various illnesses, parasites and injuries that were found in dinosaurs, plesiosaurs and pterosaurs? Like, which were universal, and which were mostly found only in certain types and species, and how likely was it to kill or debilitate? That sort of stuff? It's hard to find information about it, I've noticed. The most detailed thing I've ever seen was a while ago on TV, where they mentioned that T-Rex likely had a very strong immune system and healed fast from its injuries, because they found a skeleton of an individual that had its tail bit off and managed to live on for years afterwards (apparently not succumbing to infection).
I always have to skip over the part with the preacher. I don't like watching the mentally handicapped being exploited. Seriously though, I live in the south. I've been here for over four decades and I have met this guy over and over and over. Not him specifically of course, but there are many just like him down here. The smug smile on their faces as they make fun of the scientific community is what makes a church getting hit by lightning and burning down hilarious. And yes, that has happened twice in my town in my lifetime.
Hey trey do a Tasmanian Tiger cryptic profile. I've seen a bunch of tapes and "evidence" flowing around the internet. It would be nice if you cleared a big number of questions like: are they still on the main island? And if so how many? Why haven't we found any live specimens? The interesting thing is that most of the tapes are located with in a certain area. Please do it, it would be quite intriguing.
It is hilarious how creationists refute, ignore, and despise scientific evidence EXCEPT when they, with their inexpert understanding, think they found something that fits their fairytales.
@@wms72 there is only science. There is no creation science, no atheist science, etc. Science is conducted the same way all over the world regardless of religion, culture, language.. Some people try to make their personal beliefs seem more legitimate by attaching the word 'science' to them. This tactic does not fool people who know better. All fields of science make progress over time. 'Creation science' makes no progress and leads to no new knowledge or technologies, because there is no such thing as 'creation science'. This is why there are no 'creation science' departments at any accredited universities on planet Earth.
Just saying but could early/ proto humans have discovered the ancient dinosaur tracks and walk through them not realizing what they were, Or they could of just step into the dinosaur track to compare size out of curiosity?
I’ve been binging evolution vs creationism videos the past few days and my head just hurts so much. It makes my blood pressure rise that people so desperately try to prove something that has no solid evidence. Idk why I’m doing this to myself. I’m trying to take comfort that some people are actually willing to accept facts. The arguments people have are just sad, honestly. If it’s not clear, I believe in evolution. I don’t know that I should say believe because it doesn’t take faith to accept evidence, but whatever.
6:17 Humans don't press down into mud with nearly as much weight as dinosaurs, so isn't it understandable that its harder to find/identify human tracks?
I've been to Glenrose several times, and I've been hiking all over the U.S. Just at a glance I can tell you that those aren't human footprints, that's just how rocks look, especially in areas with rivers and/or waterfalls Smooth and strangely shaped divets, that may or may not have a vaguely similar shape to a foot, are the norm And every time I've seen the dinosaur footprints at Glen rose, I have never seen a human one except for in the dirt and mud nearby
This just confirms my own personal theory;
Humans and dinosaurs move in lines to conceal their numbers.
That's a thumbs up from me Old Ben, the Tusken Raider hypothesis.
YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only creationists are so precise.
@Karl Willdig how are they an idiot?? This seems like a very plausible hypothesis
it only conceal Dino-Cavaliers how about infantry and triceratops hauling Mangonel?
Obviously, the dinosaurs strapped human feet to their soles to confuse scientists of the future. Duh.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Look closer you'll see a snuffed out cigarette butt.
They've always been smarter than we are, even back then, it seems...
That not possible because dinosaur's don't know about humans because they're animals
@@i.s.6165 it's a joke are you 3
And when there was only 1 set of tracks, that's when Acrocanthosaurus carried me...
Well played!
Hahaha
Best.
I am screaming
I'm religious and this made me bust up laughing.
Just good comedy lol
When time travel is invented I’m stepping on a dinosaur footprint to screw with people
What if that’s why the footprint is there
Gen. Lee Interested then I’ll shake a big stick at God in defiance, and make it possible myself.
Do it in a shoe.
@Gen. Lee Interested erebus is more powerful that god.
God is not even real
@Gen. Lee Interested hahahah
the prints are obviously made by a decomposing basking shark
@William Burns without a doubt! if it's in the bible it must be true!
The Bible is the biggest lie in human history idiots..
@@5thgen691 genesis 15 : 6 one sheltered must be oblivious to sarcasm. Those whom are oblivious will thus get wooooshed
This almost had me deceased
Clawster this is the best way I’ve ever seen someone tell r/whoosh to someone
"Nasty goblin toe nails"
Shots fired
I fell into a sauropod footprint when I was six. At least I can say a dinosaur (indirectly) caused me harm...
I WAS ATTACKED BY A DINOSAUR!
So how was the feeling?
@@noavidovic1405 cold and miserable
Where were you? Like in a tourist site?
@@chamacocantones there’s a site outside Dallas with some pretty big sauropod tracks
@@dataexpunged2827 Ooh, cool af
actually the tracks were made by barn owls
Basking Sharks
Since Barn Owls are Dinosaurs, yep.
Grumpkins and Snarks more likely
Basking shark.
XD
Alright, here's something I've been thinking about. why is it ONLY humans that the "evidence" shows us? Why do we never find Elephants, Giraffes, Antelopes, Lions, or Zebras? Apparently, it was ONLY humans that existed alongside dinosaurs. It's not like other animals just don't leave footprints. People only find "Humans" instead of other modern day animals. That alone makes me think that this whole thing is stupid and untrue.
🤓Erm, akshully, it’s because humans were made by aliens. The creditable Discovery Channel show Ancient Aliens told me so 🤓
Humans hunted dinosaurs for food...Elephants and other animals stayed out of it.
Mammals would be eaten if they were close to dinosaurs, they would stay away from them. Humans would be hunting Dino's if they were the only source of food humans could find.
that's because we are still using the stupid European science that white is right. there's hundreds upon hundreds of artifacts that are made by humans that are over 300 million years old. think why science doesn't want you to know about this. it's because of the Catholic Church. keeping people stupid is a way of controlling them
These are obviously the footprints of the infamous manbearpig, I'm super serial!
And ManBearPig was responsible for Woolly Mammoths and all the other Ice Age megafauna going extinct. Excelsior!
Cereal
He sucker for toes
They took er jobs
Al Gore remembers!
Once, when I was a kid, I found a bunch of footprint-like marks in the woods, and I followed them, thinking I was tracking Bigfoot. Looking back, I feel kind of stupid.
My guy, you could have discovered Bigfoot. Why would you give up??
You're the disappointment to humanity
How so?
Why do people not believe in bigfoot? Or at least see it as a possibility? I think it makes perfect sense.
@@AzGd98 It might be an endangered speices
“Tiktaalik alongside dog” is the most cursed sentence ever
It begs the question- who would win a fight doe?
@@alexandralittle3915 probably dog since tiktaalik doesn't have sharp claws only slappy feet
The creationist in this video is obviously...a decomposing basking owl
Madeline S yeah,basking o- wait what?
Or maybe a barn shark?
It's e.l wallace
@@Lumberjack_king
bruhh E. L. Wallace more like E. L. Malice, very malicious and *_b a d_*
im bad
So you believe mans opinion over the inspired word of God Almighty? My heart breaks for you
The tracks were just barn owl and basking shark tracks. Duh!
Haj Gamer bruh i wanted to make that joke XD
Death Hunter 101 It's already been stale since a lot of people here use the same joke a million times. They even will get easily pissed off if you tell them the truth. Once you've told them that meme is stale (which still is), they'll flip their shit, throw insults & cuss out at you like you broke into their house & take their Playstation (any kind) from them & sell it on eBay for only $260.95.
That's suspiciously specific Rexy xD
so the meme is dead and rotting.... like a basking shark?
your account name though
Creationists: Dinosaur bones are a hoax
Also Creationists: We existed alongside dinosaurs so the bible is right
No more contradictory or nonsensical than anything else in the bible.
Only a couple of creationists believe the dinosaurs are fake...I think that they come up with that theory because of the way paleontologists have been rather decietful about things and the way they keep changing what the may of looked like and that all fossils in museums are not the real fossil on display ....I personally believe dinosaurs are real but not as old as 65 million years
@@perrysaker1526 what do you mean "palaeontologists have been deceitful"?
No-one has ever denied that reconstructions are the best estimate based on what is known at the time, and change as new evidence is found. Nor has anyone ever denied that the skeletons on display in museums are often casts, because the real ones are too fragile or valuable to put out.
And what evidence do you have that the accepted ages are wrong?
ANOTHER FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@@perrysaker1526 What makes you think "they aren't 65 million years old"?
Why did homeboi sound like the talking DNA strand from Jurassic Park tho
Lmao
that’s an insult to Mr. DNA
Mr DNA doesn’t deserve this.
Dina-sawers!
I'm constantly impressed by the amount of research put into your videos.
HoopsAndDinoMan Hey, nice to see you here
Lol what research? He is just stating his opinion
Soros funded
@@humacunra "...just stating his opinion" ...Did you watch the video?
@@wms72 If Soros is funding people to put a greater body of evidence together and challenge cherry-picked assumptions, then Soros' work is a good thing. This wasn't funded by Soros, but if it were, that would mean he's spending his money on good things.
Thanks, Trey. I first came across these prints, as a very immature young Christian. in a fundamentalist book. Now I knew a bit about geology, and even then something that so defied reason and a fairly well proven time line looked sus. All the more so because, to me, the photo looked as if the 'human' print had been enhanced with chalk....... In later life I met a motor trader who also knew that trick, for a not too dissimilar reason. Fifty years on, and I'm still a Christian believer, but have learned to be very sceptical about people who are too dogmatic. Sadly there is no way that you will convince those who simply do not want to see. (I don't even bother with anything that comes out of the US Bible Belt any more.)
It is the same of people claiming to have photo evidence of 20 foot human skeletal fossils being found.They are fake.Even Christians must be rational and careful in their approach to alleged evidence.It makes for a better believer.
*If you are Christian as I am* and if you've been *following evolution and following creationism with an open real scientific mind* (I have), then you know that this footprint is the least and most insignificant of a huge chain of contradictions and impossibilities exposed about the *"never proven theory of evolution-religion."*
*I invite you to START reading and listening* every single scientific article and to every single dissertation given by Creationist scientists, researchers and scholars.
Listen to the evidence side by side, study it, save it, collect it, compare it, analyze possible flaws, and strong areas.
*Second my Christian brother.* Being Christian is not an ID we received at birth, it doesn't do any good to ourselves or to advance our Creator's agenda.
*"You're not skeptical because you don't believe."*
You're skeptical because *a group of non-believers with the illusion of getting rid of God's moral laws in their lives have been feeding all of us with incomplete arguments in the name of science,* (and the government made into the law)
At the beginning it sounded right, though unproven. Over the years it's been crumbling down for the lack of evidence. Now, we know that an All knowing God is the source of knowledge and wisdom, and a Growing number of Creationist scientists have been working and rediscovering TRUTHS that had been in front of our eyes all along.
*Don't forget that the Bible is the Word of God.* If still can't understand why, do not initiate debate about it. By experience, my advice is, (as a believer as well), *ENGAGE* into extreme search mode, and if possible *become an APOLOGIST.*
*You will not regret it,* because God hates religion as much as he hates indoctrination of any kind, churches, religions, scientific indoctrinations. They all require a negative faith. *But focus on the SPIRITUAL Book.* Because being Christian is getting closer and closer to *Jesus Christ, your Lord, Savior and Creator.*
*You're Christian; you have something of a great value that transcend eternity.*
*God Bless you and your family!*
@@principleswise9749 I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure evolution is not crumbling as you say. Most scientists are confident in the evolutionary model because it actually has both predictive and explanatory power, unlike creationist models, which mostly offer ad hoc explanations of things. It's simply a matter of practicality. Evolution actually works and creationism doesn't (or has yet to).
It is entirely possible that the world was really created recently, but at this time the world instead appears very very old. Perhaps your god made the world look older than it is for some reason, but we can't just assume that is true with the evidence at hand.
@@scottdemarest9315 bruh evolution has ZERO scientific proof.
First of a it's scientific law that life cannot come from non life.
It's a scientific law that no new material can be created.
Also the amino acid actually would have killed life, not make it.
Also Evolution justifies Rasicm, colonization, and conquest.
@@helloworld7222 You seem to be confusing evolution and abiogenesis. Evolution just describes how life changes over time, not how it started. I do not know how life started, nor does anyone else with any certainty.
You say zero scientific proof. That is a pretty hefty claim, unless you believe all the scientists are in on some conspiracy.
A scientific theory doesn't tell you how to act. It just tell you how the physical world works. Some people will find any excuse to mistreat their fellow man and evolution is just one of many kinds of excuses people have used over time. If you need proof of this, consider that people have been colonizing and racially discriminating long before evolution was even thought of.
I didn't even watch yet but I already know the answer.
Short answer, no.
Long answer, no but with more details.
Hah ah ah ah aha ha...sweet.remark.....you made me laugh there, Amanda.......
There's 13 owls and a very confused basking shark in a bigfoot suit somewhere that agrees with this
You are predisposed to believe what you already want ro believe. Human and dinosaur footprints being found and fossilized in THE SAME MUD BED, means nothing to someone who doesnt want to acknowledge real OBSERVABLE SCIENCE.
@@josiahgil By the same logic, if you are dead set on believing there are human footprints fossilised along dinosaur tracks, no amount of evidence will get you to change your mind. It just goes nowhere.
@@osvaldocortes4598 what about the fact that all around the world there are giant foot prints in bedrock with five distinct toes? what about the fact that dinosaur soft tissue has been found, which proves that dinosaurs could not have lived an impossibly colossal "65 million years ago"? what about the fact that there are cultures all around the world that depict certain "dragons" in nearly the exact same way from china the mexico to greece to isreal to norway? What about the fact that the ica stones in peru shows triceratops dinosaurs with poka dot skin, and how just a few years ago scientists discovered triceratops skin for the first time, wich had poka dot skin patterns? How do evolutionists keep avoiding the nail in the coffin of your demonstrably false paradigm? If the evidence doesnt fit your paradigm, you say 'm" "well aperantly soft dinosaur tissue can survive 65 million years" It will mever occur to evolutionists to examin their methods which have been proven to not work.
He’s like “don’t these tracks look human?”
And I’m like “nooo, it’s be a strange foot if it was
They remind me of the wholes I’d put my shoe into when I walked between the big rocks at the coast. And I’m pretty sure those weren’t humans tracks?
When I see a 'strange human-like foot in rock' I think 'OK, what biped from what part of the galaxy stopped here for water to crack to get hydrogen?'
Bigfoot
These people really need to stop watching the Flintstone's as an actual documentary.
ThatDutchguy lol omg so true
Hallo mijn landgenoot
ThatDutchguy With every passing year, the movie Idiocracy transforms more and more from a comedy to a documentary.
LA AL Hahahaha 😂, wij zijn ook overal te vinden he 😉?!
Disappointed Turtle Hahahaha good one👍😂,....and sadly true😕.
In the two photos of -3b and "destroyed -3b" I can't even, for the life of me identify one common crack, spot, or line or anything suggesting that they are photos of the same rock.
Yeah and thats because different lighting, editing techniques, and cameras can completely change the appearance of a complex rock face up close like that.
they're barn owl footprints duh
MixMachine HD no no no, it's a barn owl that was also hunched over with its rear in the air screeching while walking, of course!
The dinosaur fossils aren’t dinosaurs, they’re just owl sculptures
MixMachine HD is this joke still going. I don't mind if it is it's just that the last time I referenced it I got completely shat on by a million people.
Man I felt lame
CALLEASTIC genius! A barn owl with its rear in the air IN a basking shark!
Then darn barn owls always like messing with timelines
If you want to just skip the video, here's the answer:
No.
I don’t
Nobody is actually watching the video to find out if Dinosaurs and Humans coexisted.
@@rimavet8485 Uhhh, not exactly true, I just wanted to see how the subject was going to be handled.
Fact is that there are people who aren't necessarily creationists or evolutionist who accept the possibility that dinosaurs and humans co-existed.
Simply because not enough of the very distant past has been preserved or RECOGNIZED.
Much less "discovered".
It doesn't have anything to do with ancient astronauts or time traveling either.
So much is just plain gone.lol
@@KC______ I am pretty sure it is just creationists who think dinosaurs and humans coexisted
@@KC______ Every respectable or legitimate archaeologist or paleontologist will tell you that humans and non-avian dinosaurs never once coexisted. There is simply no non-fabricated evidence to suggest otherwise. No carbon dating, no legitimate footprints, no fossils depicting their coexistence; absolute squat. There's just nothing.
First people believe humans and dinosaurs walked together, what are they gonna believe next? The earth is flat?
they will believe that Earth revolves around the moon
Its best to act like they're outcasts of humanity
The Earth: I'm not Flat!
Gustavo Perez There already are people who believe the Earth is flat. There are also people who believe that the Earth was created last Thursday and that everything that happened before last Thursday is just an illusion.
Stefan B. No shit- that was the point of the post. It’s a hypothetical hyperbolic statement of “it can’t get any worse, right?” and applied to stupid people. The kind that think dinosaurs and man coexisted, the earth was flat, and those that can’t detect simple jokes.
The "human footprints" look a whole lot like what TH-camr Quinton Reviews explained when discussing history channel documentaries, where someone was told there were three people in a grainy photo taken of JFK's assassination and suddenly they could identify two figures that weren't there before. Suggestion is a powerful thing, and when your brain wants to find something, it's very good at finding that thing.
There reverse is also true. When you don’t want to find it, you won’t either.
@@rocket5557or when it’s not there you won’t find it either
And I oop- I live in glen rose. My bio teacher tried to use the foot prints as the justification for telling us that humans lived along side dinosaurs. Smh
Interesting that the 'human' footprints are modelled on habitually shoe-wearing footprints. People who live barefoot have more splayed, separate-toed footprints. So they coexisted with dinosaurs, wore shoes, but took them off for some reason.
THIS
Why would you wade through a river or mud with your shoes on ?
@@petrosnemardos good point. So we need to find some cretaceous Nikes that would fit on an 11-foot-tall person.
Not really. I know people who have never worn shoes in their life, and their toes aren't like that.
@@MrEpeeFencer and that's the difference between empirical and anecdotal evidence. A classic differentiator between shoe-wearers and barefoot people is the distance between the toes.
I've seen the tracks in Glen Rose, and worked at the Fort Worth Museum of Science and History, where a Paluxysaurus jonesi skeleton is on display. Unfortunately, it was rather common for children to interrupt me when I said the fossil was over 100 million years old, to argue that the world was actually only a few thousand years old. SMH..
>is 6 years old and barges into your presentation
> states dinosaur fossils are actually five thousand years old
>refuses to elaborate
>leaves
well ya consrrvwtive mindrot is strong there
Poor kids...
"Nasty-looking goblin toenails"
oh my Lord Trey lol, that one burst my lung. Great video BTW.
I remember that my grade 10 biology teacher believed this nonsense.
That's rather disturbing. I guess the educational system has been going down hill for a while.....
Faust 23 “downhill” from what, exactly? When was this magical golden age of absolute knowledge in our society?
@Don't Eat Animals
Before shooting off your mouth, you really should do serious research. The odds of evolution forming a functioning cell is 10 to the 35 power. That just happens to be greater odds then all of the stars in the UNIVERSE! You would have a better chance of taking all of the pre-maid parts from a fine Swiss watch, throwing them into the air, and have them come down into a working, functioning watch with the correct time. Just the way that DNA has to fold inside of a cell to make it work, is something evolutionists avoid like the plague! Bye the way, I hate vegans! Vegans eat my food. Vegans eat the food that my food eats!
@@SuperDave-vj9en Please give some links to your serious research.
Super Dave i- what??? If your trying to make a compelling argument at least don’t go off topic at the last minute. 😐😐
You missed one important point - the "human" footprints go deeper than the dinosaur ones, which would mean the supposed human had a greater foot pressure than the dinosaurs
Logically speaking the human tracks could be older, however even if we found proof humans and dinosaurs undoubtedly existed together this would still be unlikely
Pressure = force per unit area. Larger force from dinosaur weight is supported by larger foot area in the mud. I haven’t worked out the math to compare the psi of the ornithomimus foot compared to the human foot for average human weight, but larger force doesn’t necessarily mean larger pressure.
Kuban destroying the tracks is my new favorite conspiracy theory xD
An explanation of how tracks can be fossilized would be welcome.
I thought I knew the answer but when I thought about it I was clueless 😂
Dry Clay, dry mud pretty much
@@legendaryxenozilla9061 I suppose if the tracks were made in clay, and then got covered in a different material, say very different composition to clay, perhaps the material over the top of the footprints in clay wouldn't form such a tough rock as the clay when compressed over time so would erode away leaving the tracks maybe? Something like that?
@@samarnadra it’s like casting, but natural, I guess.
@@eriosyce688 maybe ashes?
It's a bit like that "face" on Mars. Which is only a face if seen on a blurry photo with light from a specific direction and not at all at other times. :P Stupid light, trying to deceive us! Edit: Oh, he used that photo too. XD Note to self... don't comment before the video is ended. :P
Alexander the great would say, these are games and joke of the god Apollon.
:) My parents took me there in the 80s when I was a kid. They loved vacationing in Texas, loved making trips educational and I loved dinosaurs, so that trip was particularly exciting for me.
Edit: Having watched to the end, we went there probably ‘86 or ‘87 and yeah, definitely never saw anything resembling human footprints, so at least a year or two before they claimed the supposed prints were destroyed.
They were destroyed days after they were discovered so say investigators.
@@johnglad5 XD That would be one hell of a labor to smooth it all out and make it look natural if that ever actually happened.
@@NecrochildK Video evidence shows it happened. One day the prints are there the next day just unrecognizable depressions in the sandstone. That was 40 years ago I believe so they would be worn smooth via erosion now.
@@johnglad5 I've seen videos on it before, and no, there never were any. It was some people having a big case of apophenia. Seeing patterns that aren't there. Like the face on Mars. As for 40 years ago, I visited the site with my parents about 35 or more years ago. It wouldn't have been worn down smooth back then already if it had just been chipped away in recent years at the time.
@@NecrochildK Well I haven't been there. I've seen right left tracks 14 in a row I believe. Some of the prints overlapped (stepped into) a series of Dino tracks. One or two of the tracks could not be mistaken for anything but human.
Carl Baugh on an archaelogical dig for his thesis dug out human prints from underneath slabs of limestone. All of it documented. Just sayin. PTL
I can imagine a Acrocanthosaurus hunting a flock of ornithomimids at that time. However they would say that humans ride on the ornithomimids... I think thats how you spell the family group.
Jack Mills oh like ark
*fleentstones*
good point. i mean people ride ostriches
Tauntauns...
I think the weight of the Ornithomimids won't support the weight of those of humans, so... unlikely
A true Christmas present when trey uploads
You like ihe
Durr Plant
Indeed
LA AL yep
Lmao...
Why would any ancient human put their foot directly inside the dinosaur tracks??? To my knowledge hunters don’t directly walk inside the tracks.
Eypick if an ancient human was chasing a large animal hunting, they could have accidentally stepped on the prints, but this is fake.
Humans will always be weird if i was time traveling thats what id do
Eypick good hunters will step where another hunter has stepped or in its preys tracks to limit noises mad because anything that could make noise had been compressed or broke already, you’re welcome for the hunting tips
Its just easier to walk through compressed mud or snow. DUH!
We do. I hunt, and will use say the deers trail depending on different factors, such as snow or mud, it’s easier to walk in a path already created then make one yourself or even leaves,leaves are loud to walk on, but not if they have been flattened before you. Hunters use already established animal trails a lot aswell because they pick the best routes usually and are free of things that make noise.
When time travel is invented *I'M* gonna get a dinosaur to step on *MY* footprint
I do not recall the location, but I have heard of there being a dinosaur footprint on top of a human one.
@@saraross8396 found another bs creationist
What a sweet early Christmas gift!
The lengths people will go to deamonize others who provide evidence.
Also I never knew about dinosaurs walking on their soles, can we get more info on that?
I feel really bad for Kuban. He seems like a good guy that just likes fossils a lot and these creationists go all torches and pitchforks on him.
Yeah, theropods can walk on their metatarsals in the same sense we can walk on our tip toes. www.researchgate.net/publication/305177688_Crouching_theropod_at_the_seaside_Matching_footprints_with_metatarsal_impressions_and_theropod_authopods_a_morphometric_approach
TREY the Explainer Crouching theropod, hidden sauropod.
of course they have torches and pitchforks, their ancestors were a bunch of braindead fuckers like them
#RememberSalem
Good to see ya bary.
After looking at it for awhile it Does kinda look like a foot but I think that's just me trying to look for a pattern. Also I messed with the lighting a bit and it look more human like further proving that lighting can really change a photo
i've been there personally... they are more convincing then they are in the pictures. infact if you go there there are literal signs there making fun of the prints saying "dinosaurs wore human foot print shoes" obviously jokes... there are also Obvious chisel marks on only the toes... there are eye witnesses and signs even in the park saying that people have tried to chisel the toes off so people dont think they are human... people tried to cover it up..
@@thesavior2398 The thing I can't get over is why would ancient humans walk exactly where the dinosaurs did? And why is their gait the same as dinosaurs the were quite a bit bigger than them? That's like when you were a kid and you walked exactly in your father's footprints but because he was so much taller than you, you had to take slow, uncomfortable, silly, wide steps. That's what the ancient humans would have to do if they made those prints. Walk around like blithering idiots.
@@The_Big_Jay well i suggest you go there for your self before judging... the fact that there are human footprints there is clear as day... as far as the gate size. that's an understandable question. and does take a bit of believe in it first to start to understand the reason. theirs a museum there in glen rose TX. they put live animals from birth into a higher pressure atmospheric tank with a larger proportion of oxygen then we see today... without fail these animals are seen to grow up to 2-3 times their normal natural size.... even fish are seen to grow larger in these chambers. my believe and their hypothesis is that the earth had a different atmosphere back then (even if you believe in "full" evolution (by the way even none evolutionist believe in adaption) its not far fetched to think there was a different atmospheric composition a long time ago... the hypothesis (and it is a hypothesis its not a for sure known fact) is that the humans may have grown taller in this more suitable atmosphere and therefore could have been tall enough to make such great strides. something like a average height of 7-8 feet but maybe more... there are many many known cases that ancient bug and animals were larger then the ones we see today... why would humans be any different if they were around that time? what makes us think they weren't? because a fancy rock scientist tells you how old a rock is??? go out and see for your self. make your on conclusion instead of listening to everyone else.
@@The_Big_Jay also thank you for commenting in a civilized manner! i implore you to come up with your own conclusions even if they are far different then my own. thank you for the civil conversation!
@@thesavior2398 Why haven't we found ANY fossils of 7-8 foot tall human, with feet that just so happen to match the size of a 5-6 foot tall man today? I feel like if they were made by 7-8 foot tall humans, the foot print wouldn't be the exact same size as ours today. Have you seen the world's tallest man? He suffers from a form of brain tumor that didn't let his body stop growing. I believe he is around the previously mentioned 7-8 feet tall and his feet are *massive* and almost twice as big as a normal man's foot. Also, let's say for the sake of arguement that the human's were 7-8 foot tall and existed, why would the walk exclusively in the footprints of dinosaurs? There are none on their own, always in a dinosaur print and always walking the same direction of the dinosaur.
I can’t stop looking at the guy speaking he looks like a southern Dracula
What fascinates me is how those dinosaur trackways got preserved in the first place, rather than just eroding away. Could you explain this fossilisation process?
Huge flood , then everything gets buried in mud.
@@marcdemell5976 based
Hello - I find the main issue in this topic to be the unwillingness to investigate this manifest fantasy of the geologic column and age. The concept was developed by Charles Lyell specifically to take " Moses " ( creator ) out of the science. The man wasn't a scientist but a geologic hobbyist and lawyer. Later Darwin gravitated toward his concepts to bolster his Evolutionary/Natural selection theory which required vast amounts of time to justify the changes in species. Now 2 issues. 1. Lyell was FOC and admitted so in his personal writings. 2. Darwin's evolutionary theory is an epic fail and NOT supported factually by any quantifying science - it's just a faith based concept in the doctrine of materialism.
So as far as Dino's go their is an astounding amount of potential evidence of dino's coexisting with mankind and one of the final nails has been the soft tissue found in over a hundred animals from various sights.
Follow the money - 2 many grants and agendas to be justified, and an unwillingness to question the dogma of the "scientific" community.
Simple as - Evolution was the main stay of " science " to contradict Intelligent design which generally focuses on a relatively recent creation event. Some very powerful folks will do anything to keep their mind control on the public and others Scientists/Universities operate on grants to support the agenda so they have boxed themselves in a corner defending a failed principle ( Evolutionary theory ) which depends entirely upon vast amounts of time to produce it's supposed results ( which are scientifically unproven ). Both sides have the exact same data but have chosen different avenues of explanation. 1 involves supernatural events the other only material events. BOTH require FAITH since science by it's nature cannot explain origins i.e. you can say all you want about common ancestor but they cannot explain the FIRST ( abiogenesis ) life form nor explain the bottleneck in genetics.
Nor do they have ANY factual physical evidence of a species changing into another nor the fossil records to support that claim. Is what it is.
“ fossils bc of da flood - based”
*citation needed*
When ever creationests start talking, Charles Darwin rolls in his grave
itsalie Stop copy and pasting the same baseless comment everywhere
alaster boneman Just Rollin around in there
He has been rolling so much he has drilled his way to the center of the earth!!
love the book and movie
alaster boneman Charles Darwin actually said his theory didn't disprove creationism
But nobody listened to him
I want to see a TREY the Explainer vs Ken Han debate.
Oh man, that would be exhausting. Just watching Bill Nye debate him was insufferable. Ham is like talking to a brick wall... sometimes I wonder if he is for real or some kind of troll
TREY the Explainer too bad it must happen now
Miguel Oros 😳 Why would you want such a non event to take place? With a person who is so deeply deluded that he is completely in denial of reality? A person who told Bill Nye that he would believe the bible over science? Why give this man any iota of ‘credibility’ in his eyes and those of his equally deluded followers? Really!
Sir Meow The Library Cat the question is never why but why not
Ken Ham barely deserves to debate a children's edutainer. I don't think he deserves to debate an edutainer aimed at an older audience.
I don't understand why people try to focus so much on the age of Earth. The Bilble does not directly oppose evolution.
The age of the earth has nothing to do with evolution
A new upload from Trey? a Merry Christmas it is indeed
I love how the fact that the supposed "human" footprints are on top of the dinosaurs footprint XD
What difference would that make?
Lynn Troller it's like the "human" only walk on top of the dinosaur footprint, like, there's no human footprint beside the one on top of the dinosaur footprint.
Daniel Daniar
Are you aware that with cameras rolling a machine was used to lift the riverbed and the tracks just keep on going? Regardless of who stepped on who’s is irrelevant. The fact is, they are together. There are more lesser known examples of human and dinosaur footprints found together that academia rather not discuss- it would turn their theories upside down and they’d be out of a job overnight.
Daniel Daniar
Check this out
th-cam.com/video/8AuM3rrRmBA/w-d-xo.html
Lynn Troller why is human live alongside dinosaur made the evolutions theory obsolete ? And i love how the creationist REFUSED to acknowledge the possible theory created by the evolutionist.
wow, I didn't know that some dinosaurs could be Plantagenet, I thought they all were digitgenet. I almost always learn something new on your videos, thanks.
isn't it plantigrade and digigrade?
Robot killer digitigrade, but yes.
No dinosaur could ever be a member of the British family that ruled for most of Britain's middle ages.
You mean plantigrade and digitigrade?
The more you know “ start cheesy star music”
Yeah bro, imma demolish this stone with the most suitable tool for the job, a metal rod, not you know, a sledgehammer or something like that, just a metal rod.
I mean, a smaller point of contact makes it easier to break a rock. I've done it before.
Come on TREY. Don't lie to us, The tracks were obviously owl tracks
I had so many nightmares at the age of 7, when I first found out and started loving dinosaurs. In those nightmares I was always chased by a t-rex until I could find a small cave to hide in. And the cave was always just deep enough to keep the Rex from getting me. Imagine my flashbacks when I watched the Jurassic park Lost World for the first time! That waterfall scene that the people were trying to hide behind. My mom got tired of me crawling into her bed every time I had one of those nightmares (I kicked like a mule, she said).
I think those nightmares came from watching those old movies where cave men fought dinosaurs.
10:44 Looks more like *the Lorax* than a footprint. 🤷🏽♀️
It is also weird that the footprints are that of humans that grew up wearing shoes. Humanoids that have never worn shoes have substantially splayed toes.
Boi back at it again with the great content
There's a cryptid in Liberia that's supposedly an extinct crocodile relative. Its over 20ft long and has a short snout. It's called the Gbahali.
Humberto Martinez Sounds interesting, because there probably did exist a crocodile like that in the past.
Disappointed Turtle they're claiming it was a postosuchus. Which may not be too ridiculous considering the fact that most crocodilians today were around millions of years ago.
Humberto Martinez
I don't think it's exactly a Postosuchus. In all reality it is probably a crocodile with a body type similar to that of Kaprosuchus or Quinkana. Not also does kaprosuchus come from a nearby country, but that body plan for crocodiles has gone extinct several times and reemerged several times as well throughout history.
It's a body plan that just refuses to die
Shadlos you're right, it's probably convergent evolution. An interesting thing about this cryptid, is that when I saw interviews being conducted on the locals, the locals never held superstitious claims to it. They regarded is as simply another animal.
Humberto Martinez Not exactly. Although modern crocodile species resemble prehistoric ones in overall body shape, they are still new species with anatomical differences (Trey explained this well in his video about living fossils). The saltwater-crocodile for example is only about 4 million years old. Also modern crocodiles were able to survive because of their successful niche as amphibious predators, while many terrestrial ones like Postosuchus died out because they were outcompeted in their niche as terrestrial predators by dinosaurs and mammals.
I've been to Dinosaur Valley State Park, a few times.
Some of the tracks do look like they might be human, but follow the track forward or back a few steps, and you can see that the tracks were definitely made by a three toed animal. The human resembling tracks, are just eroded is infilled.
Trey the Explainer you explain things in such a smooth and detailed way. I love your work.
Best present ever!!!! Thank you so much Trey!!!
No problem man ;) I hope you enjoy it!
TREY the Explainer *faints cause senpai notices him*
TREY the Explainer you inspired me to make make my own channel Over The Millennia
Thanks so much for this in-depth video. I heard about the Paluxy prints in a book a long time ago, and was always curious, but I've never seen anything that goes into as much detail as you do. I liked how you showed all the photos so clearly, and also located them all on the map of all the dinosaur prints.
The Flintstones were not lies. Hahaha. HalleluYAH!
But there’s no way Hanna & Barbara (Hanna-Barbara, creators of Flintstones, Scooby Doo, etc) would’ve known that.
They just made it because it’s funny, NOT because it’s a documentary
I once found some pretty old footprint in a beach in South Brazil. There used to be a huge dune above the footprints, but one year the winds changed, or the sea hit different and dune disappeared, revealing sand so compacted that I would not correct anybody who said that this was actually rock. The footprints were from humans, and amerindians are tought to have been in that region since 12000 years ago. I wouldn't gave it less than 100 years. I really wished I could bring an archaeologist with me to see this, but being close to sea they might have vanished already.
Is this a joke? Have you reported this to the proper expert nonetheless?
@@josephpostma1787 there are paleontological sites 200 meters away from the dunes in a mountain at seashore, some pretty old coral fossils. Crossing the beach north-south direction there is another mountain, an archeological site, where are some 6000-5000 years old paintings and circunferical stones used for sharpening blades. The civilization that used to live there, before being wiped out by migrant indians, were the sambaquis.
I didn't made any contact to "authorities", first of all, the local archeologists are much more interested in searching the seabed to find sank ships, swords, guns and such things, than to take a look at some old footprint that could be just the age of our grand grandparents.
If I had mineralogical knowledge, oh boy, that would have been some cool shit to study.
When stepping in mud, there’s lots of oozing, you don’t get pristine impressions.
It’s human nature to let personal bias to become the only explanation, and discount what is plain to see.
There's oozing except for all the other fossilized footprints that have no oozing. There's only oozing when it makes me right
So close to 200,000 subs congratulations
"Parry-DO-lia" is how it's pronounced.
Great video as always!
Incorrect: Par-eidolia, since it comes from the Greek: para and eidolon (aye/eye doh lon)
@@cookeymonster83 Incorrect: Doesnt matter where it came from. We speak English. In English it is pronounced as the OP says.
@@morkusmorkus6040 incorrect . Saying “we speak English “ to justify your terrible pronunciation is a bad argument
@@Lnblackberry48 Its not. Its just the facts. In English, thats how its said. Doesn't matter about its roots or where it came from.
@@morkusmorkus6040 it’s still wrong though
It's good that you talk about these things in a fair, skeptical way. There's many interesting artifacts and what not that get misinterpreted by lunes and ignored by most of the scientific field. Most of the time with "unexplainable" artifacts, they're immediately dismissed, hidden away, and mostly forgotten until conspiracy theorists get their hands on them. When there's odd and unexplainable artifacts, even if they seem to challenge all we know, they should be presented before the world in hopes of finding an answer. At the very least, we should take them as a reminder to be skeptical of all we think we know. To keep thinking critically, that's what science is about.
I think so too. Too often people just write off these kind of things and don't even give them a chance. The problem is that there are people that actually believe in this kind of stuff and don't really know how to evaluate things skeptically. I think just dismissing it is not a good way to convince anyone.
I couldn't agree more with your ideology. Nobody should be afraid of inquiry and science.
TREY the Explainer indeed. But the fact an uninformed public can be swayed into believing such things is a reason we should focus on these things and find an answer. Someone offering any form of answer is often listened to more than people who keep saying idk.
'During the 1930s and the Depression, Glen Rose residents made money by distilling moonshine and selling dinosaur fossils. Each fossil brought 15 to 30 dollars. When the supply ran low, George Adams just carved more, some with human footprints thrown in. My dad, Weldon Eakin, and my grandfather decided one day, I don’t know if it was to make money, or what, to start carving man tracks alongside the dinosaur tracks. They poured acid to make the fossils look like aged limestone.' Zana Douglas, Granddaughter of George Adams, original hoaxer of the Paluxy River dinosaur tracks, Glen Rose, Texas.
I instantly forgot what I was doing when I saw that Trey updated.
;)
It's interesting that all of the tracks which "prove" humans coexisted with dinosaurs show either human tracks separate from dinosaur tracks, or human tracks on top of or inside dinosaur tracks. So they always show the dinosaur making tracks, and then the human coming along and making tracks at a later date. They have never found footprints of a human making tracks, and then a dinosaur coming along at a later date and making tracks on top of the human tracks. You would have thought they would have come up for some phoney baloney explanation as to why this is, but they just seem to have left that massive flaw in their argument wide open.
Nice Animated intro! I love it!
Thanks man!
Your welcome, I really enjoy your work!
my cat got pissed off when the guy was talking
2:29
To clarify she was laying content in my lap with her eyes almost full closed then when he started talking she opened her eyes that were slited and had her ears pines back
I would follow along tracks jumping from one to next.
It's a common hunting technique. That means nothing, but it's a fun fact.
3:26 I love how he's convinced by a track where you can clearly see the theropod toes
NOW THIS IS A CHRISTMAS GIFT!
I'll get to watching it after we're done dining. I have to say, you're one of my favourite content creators if not my #1, happy holidays Trey!
Thanks Emilio! I'm happy you enjoy my videos so much ^^ I proud to have fans like you that appreciate them. Happy holidays to you too!
TREY the Explainer Have a great dinner night, hope you find a basking shark carcass under the tree!
Looking forward to your work on 2018 as always, cheers!
I grew up and lived in Glen Rose for a long time and I still go to the town as I live nearby. I’ve seen these tracks before when I was around 8 with my dad. They are awesome to see in the summer when the riverbed is dry. I think another piece of evidence proving that the prints were inhuman is the vast size of them. My dad and I, who at that point believed that they were human footprints (and honestly I believed until I watched this video), were in awe when we put our own bare feet in some of the prints. Some of the prints (of which I only remember maybe 2 or 3) are massive compared to even an adult’s footprint.
Funnily enough, Glen Rose also has a creationist museum on the way to Dinosaur Valley State Park where the prints are located. I have visited the museum a few times, one on a field trip when I was in private school and another with a friend after we graduated high school because we were bored. There’s definitely some cool stuff worth looking at there, but I wouldn’t take anything about dinosaurs at face value. Stick with the model of the Ark and the pottery from Israel.
If you ever want to do another updated video on this, (as small of a chance that is lol), I would be glad to go out there and take some better images and videos of it. I’ve been looking for a reason to head back out there again.
Years ago there was a video about a person who was using a chipping hammer on some of the tracks he said he was cleaning them up for scientists to study WTF ? The person filming the video told him to stop , it looked like he was destroying evidence. willcarmichie maybe you could dig into that . I tried to find the video to post here but it's long gone i remember him showing a footprint that looked human like and then chipping out rock saying the actual footprint was deeper that sediment had covered the original , when he was finished it just looked like a chipped out hole in the ground.
If you dismissed those human footprints because of their size then thats a real shame, because there is plenty of evidence to prove that humans were much bigger than modern man is today. I challenge you to look up the many documentaries that prove that giants once lived on this planet, In every country. Just in America, alone, newspaper reports were common in the 19th and early 20th centuries that showed the discoveries of giant human skeletons found all over the place in the USA. You can read the actual articles and see the photographs taken at the time. It is really something to see.
Oh joy its X mas with out some crazy. You bring me so much joy trey
^^ always happy to
Great video! What a great Christmas present! 🦖🦕
Thanks Amanda! Happy you enjoyed ;)
Would you make a video about the *Krampus* the most adorable myhtological being of all time ? :)
Holy Shit! I can't believe that I looked what Krampus was... Screw You
:P
Sweg893 - The Dinosaur Guy
Oh C'mon; isn't he and ms. Krampus smile so adorable when they abduct unsuspecting (maybe) innocent-ish victims ? :)
Btw Krampus looks more original like the *Pagan* Santa :D
Dud, I never said it looked ugly, it was too beautiful for anyone to have.
Sweg893 - The Dinosaur Guy
LoLoLoLoL ! :D
Nothing in Particular
Ah Common dude !
Isn't his and ms Krampus smile (adorable) with their crocodile like yellowish rotten 'teeth', full of terrorized people fearing for their dear lives, is super cute ?
*Blame Germanic mythology; not me :P*
The video rises another urgent question: Did dinosaurs live alongside nasty goblins?
They're clearly Bigfoot footprints
wrong, its clearly a decomposing basking shark
Why did you give us a Christmas present early
Something I forget often is that Dinosaurs were just animals from another time.
Obviously the tracks are land basking sharks
Xandeowolf and barn owls
I'm Catholic, but I believe in evolution for the most part. And I find that one human set out of thousands of dinosaur tracks found is absolutely not evidence. Honestly, without even reading the halfway mark, it's probably just some other creature with large nails that made such deep embeds.
I don't necessarily agree with the argument that since our feet dont fit, it isn't a human cast. If evolution is the topic at hand, such an argument could be used against that. Maybe comparing the feet of our ancestors would be more accurate of an argument.
Sorry for being that “guy”, but one doesn’t “believe” in evolution, but accepts it as a scientific fact.
Have you ever done, or would you ever consider doing a video about the various illnesses, parasites and injuries that were found in dinosaurs, plesiosaurs and pterosaurs? Like, which were universal, and which were mostly found only in certain types and species, and how likely was it to kill or debilitate? That sort of stuff? It's hard to find information about it, I've noticed.
The most detailed thing I've ever seen was a while ago on TV, where they mentioned that T-Rex likely had a very strong immune system and healed fast from its injuries, because they found a skeleton of an individual that had its tail bit off and managed to live on for years afterwards (apparently not succumbing to infection).
Merry Christmas Trey
I always have to skip over the part with the preacher. I don't like watching the mentally handicapped being exploited.
Seriously though, I live in the south. I've been here for over four decades and I have met this guy over and over and over. Not him specifically of course, but there are many just like him down here. The smug smile on their faces as they make fun of the scientific community is what makes a church getting hit by lightning and burning down hilarious. And yes, that has happened twice in my town in my lifetime.
Bruh
Honestly sounds like the closet thing to Divine Intervention these folks will get in their lifetime.
also happens to the opposite side but different, it's all just point of view
@@dev4159 Silence, creationist.
@@a-rat-in-your-walls wtf wdym i'm just saying that it also happens to the other side not that im from it
The only dinosaurs humans coexist with are chickens. Little shits are terrifying sometimes.
Hey trey do a Tasmanian Tiger cryptic profile. I've seen a bunch of tapes and "evidence" flowing around the internet. It would be nice if you cleared a big number of questions like: are they still on the main island? And if so how many? Why haven't we found any live specimens? The interesting thing is that most of the tapes are located with in a certain area. Please do it, it would be quite intriguing.
It is hilarious how creationists refute, ignore, and despise scientific evidence EXCEPT when they, with their inexpert understanding, think they found something that fits their fairytales.
Cartoon Raccoon Ah! "Creation Science" - the world's best example of an oxymoron.
You commenters mocking Creation science know NOTHING about either Creation nor Science.
@@wms72 there is only science. There is no creation science, no atheist science, etc. Science is conducted the same way all over the world regardless of religion, culture, language..
Some people try to make their personal beliefs seem more legitimate by attaching the word 'science' to them. This tactic does not fool people who know better.
All fields of science make progress over time. 'Creation science' makes no progress and leads to no new knowledge or technologies, because there is no such thing as 'creation science'.
This is why there are no 'creation science' departments at any accredited universities on planet Earth.
Ok then do YOU have any experience in these fields? Or is it just “evolution is just theory even tho I don’t know how a scientific theory works”?
I saw undeniable evidence of man coexisting with dinosaurs when I went down to feed my families hens.
Good one
Wake up sheeple!
Just saying but could early/ proto humans have discovered the ancient dinosaur tracks and walk through them not realizing what they were, Or they could of just step into the dinosaur track to compare size out of curiosity?
I think the scientific consensus is that the track thought as 'human' by certain group of people are actually bipedal theropod dinosaur's
Not really since there is about 60-80 million years between even the earlist record of what we'd consider sapien.
Trey can you please do a paleo profile on Nyctosaurus?
Also i heard that Mesozoica was released yesterday, so if it was, could you take a look at that?
SuperSourG It was supposed to be released, but it got delayed yet again
Daniel Ey yeah i just found that out after posting the comment
SuperSourG Ya they had a mistake, January 2nd is the new ETA
I went here as a child...it was amazing to see real dinosaur tracks. i remember the duckbill dinosaur tracks specifically.
I’ve been binging evolution vs creationism videos the past few days and my head just hurts so much. It makes my blood pressure rise that people so desperately try to prove something that has no solid evidence. Idk why I’m doing this to myself. I’m trying to take comfort that some people are actually willing to accept facts. The arguments people have are just sad, honestly.
If it’s not clear, I believe in evolution. I don’t know that I should say believe because it doesn’t take faith to accept evidence, but whatever.
th-cam.com/video/_uh4j8hyVFQ/w-d-xo.html
Same
Coming back to this after Dan Olson’s new video. I was struck with such nostalgia for this old video from back when I was in high school
*HAPPY NEW YEAR TREY!!!!* :D
6:17 Humans don't press down into mud with nearly as much weight as dinosaurs, so isn't it understandable that its harder to find/identify human tracks?
I've been to Glenrose several times, and I've been hiking all over the U.S.
Just at a glance I can tell you that those aren't human footprints, that's just how rocks look, especially in areas with rivers and/or waterfalls
Smooth and strangely shaped divets, that may or may not have a vaguely similar shape to a foot, are the norm
And every time I've seen the dinosaur footprints at Glen rose, I have never seen a human one except for in the dirt and mud nearby
When your parents are blood related, creationism just makes perfect sense. ( insert dualing banjo music here)