Small Planes Over Big Oceans (ETOPS Explained)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ค. 2017
  • Support Wendover Productions and get 10% off your order at Hover by using the link: hover.com/wendover
    & the code "wendover" at checkout
    Check out my new podcast with Brian from Real Engineering:
    itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/s... (iTunes link)
    / @showmakers9570 (TH-cam link)
    Support Wendover Productions on Patreon: / wendoverproductions
    Get a Wendover Productions t-shirt for $20: store.dftba.com/products/wend...
    TH-cam: / wendoverproductions
    Twitter: / wendoverpro
    Email: WendoverProductions@gmail.com
    Reddit: / wendoverproductions
    Select visuals courtesy www.Shutterstock.com
    The full script with sources can be found here: drive.google.com/file/d/0B2p-...
    Animation by Josh Sherrington ( / heliosphere )
    Sound by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
    Thumbnail by Joseph Cieplinski (joec.design)
    Research by William Mayne
    Big thanks to Patreon supporters: Ark Balagan, David Cichowski, Venkata Kaushik Nunna, Josh Berger, Vincent Mooney, Marcelo Teivelis, Victor Zimmer,
    Paul Jihoon Choi, Huang MingLei, Dylan Benson, Maximillian van Kasbergen, Etienne Dechamps, Alex Duvall, Rob Harvey, Ark Balagan, Hagai Bloch Gadot, Aitan Magence, William Chappell, Eyal Matsliah, Sihien, Joseph Bull, Marcelo Alves Vieira, Hank Green, Plinio Correa, Connor J Smith, and Brady Bellini
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 2.5K

  • @Wendoverproductions
    @Wendoverproductions  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1819

    So apologies for the slightly shorter and perhaps less refined video than usual! In the last month there's been 5 days when I *haven't* been traveling which means less time to make videos. The good news is that a lot of that travel was to make videos.
    Also please be sure to check out the video's sponsor, Hover, with the link in the description! The sponsors truly make the videos happen (along with Patreon supporters) so be sure to show them some love.

    • @aaihamm
      @aaihamm 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Wendover Productions
      awesome videos, keep it up 👍

    • @kushagarwal3564
      @kushagarwal3564 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi, I hope to see excellent videos!, please could you reply to me?

    • @justintorre694
      @justintorre694 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wendover Productions still good though!!:)

    • @Alex-ul5bp
      @Alex-ul5bp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wendover Productions hey, thanks for the cool videos, could i reccomend saying at the end for your sponsors "this video was helped made possible" rather than "this video was made possible"

    • @kylenetherwood8734
      @kylenetherwood8734 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I prefer bitesize videos personally

  • @marxismpotato
    @marxismpotato 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3046

    "Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim"
    ayy

    • @neelparmar6690
      @neelparmar6690 7 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      Somehow I think that passengers wouldn't get the chance to swim either way...

    • @qwerty112311
      @qwerty112311 7 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Neel Parmar engines go and a plane turns into a big glider, which can be smoothly put down on an ocean. Probably wouldn't be able to swim anywhere, but they'd be able to swim.

    • @noob.168
      @noob.168 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      dw. you'll learn how to swim when ur life is in danger. ;)

    • @farhanw3679
      @farhanw3679 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      yo im learnin

    • @dave5194
      @dave5194 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      qwerty112311 Except water landings are still pretty risky, despite the fact that the planes look like it would work well. Think about it: the plane id coming down fast, near the water level it will experience a lot of turbulence and the plane won't be very stable. The plane also has a wide wingspan. This is the most dangerous part. If one of the wing tips catch the water, the plane immediately cartwheel & of course it's the ocean, so the waves aren't always calm. Ignoring all that you still have to touch down right so that you slow down rather than skip and risky the plane tearing itself apart. It takes a lot of precision to land a plane on the water.

  • @aghanr
    @aghanr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3483

    a year from now "This Wendover Production video, was made possible, by Boeing. Get your own 777-300ER from Boeing."

  • @tonyle72
    @tonyle72 5 ปีที่แล้ว +680

    Now I know why it's taken over a year to get Southwest Airlines certified for flights to Hawaii. There's more to it than just the airplane.

    • @joe8124
      @joe8124 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Southwest flies to Hawaii? This is news to me.

    • @mirzaahmed6589
      @mirzaahmed6589 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@joe8124 they started in May, but had planned them for years.

    • @hassebrasse7210
      @hassebrasse7210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why tho? There are zero divertion airports anyways.

    • @johnduffy2777
      @johnduffy2777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      HasseBrasse engine failures are rare and it unlikely that both engines will fail

    • @imjashingyou3461
      @imjashingyou3461 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@johnduffy2777 both engines fail even then 99% of the time at cruising altitude that plane will glide for 100 to 150 miles up to an hour before you hit the ocean. Giving time for rescue craft to get up and in the area or an attempt to make it to land. Thats if you can keep an single engine going for another hour or even half hour you can go pretty far.

  • @JoelJames2
    @JoelJames2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +302

    5:39 That awkward moment when the delay due to a failed engine mid flight is shorter than a normal American Airlines delay.

    • @zangrygrapes4571
      @zangrygrapes4571 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That airline was American airlines tho

    • @someone-wx4ww
      @someone-wx4ww 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@zangrygrapes4571yes that’s the joke

  • @garydunken7934
    @garydunken7934 5 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    7:30 That puppy plane A318 was so cute. Its wings are so tiny, but tail appeared slightly bigger relative to the size of the fuselage.

    • @Rilex037
      @Rilex037 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      lol, yea, dimensions of the wings are the same as much larger a321; never the less, this planes handles like crazy, try watching approach at EGLC

    • @hassebrasse7210
      @hassebrasse7210 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks like a mini-380

    • @DarkwearGT
      @DarkwearGT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gei

    • @theodoreeicher4879
      @theodoreeicher4879 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      the a318’s tail is actually slightly taller than the other a320 series planes

    • @NatureXwars
      @NatureXwars 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The OG 737-100 looks cuter imo, with its sleeker appearance & dinky engines.

  • @mikebronicki6978
    @mikebronicki6978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +290

    "Sydney to Santiago" route will just crush the argument of many flat earthers.

    • @sargismartirosyan2803
      @sargismartirosyan2803 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why

    • @mikebronicki6978
      @mikebronicki6978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@sargismartirosyan2803 oh, one of the flat earther arguments is "Why are there no direct flights from Australia to South America?" You see, if you look at a polar centered map of the earth, the distance from Australia to South America is about 20,000 miles, lol.

    • @klondiker9
      @klondiker9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Yeah... but they usually say that that route doesn't exist and no matter what you say they don't budge from their opinion. They usually go with "you can buy a ticket, but the flight always gets cancelled" etc. Its pretty dumb

    • @Gautier-cw9bu
      @Gautier-cw9bu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@klondiker9 some of them even say australia doesn't exist because of that

    • @prplt
      @prplt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      they say it's because of the winds 😂

  • @DSB1234567890
    @DSB1234567890 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    That bit about BA flying an A318 from New York to London City is nuts! It ended around the pandemic. Some fun facts about that flight:
    - The airplane was configured all business class with only 32 seats
    - Due to the short runway at London City, it had to take off partially fueled and refuel in Shannon. This wasn't an issue leaving from New York.

  • @DoubleGauss
    @DoubleGauss 5 ปีที่แล้ว +807

    Why is the A319 crossing the Atlantic such a big deal ? Charles Lindbergh crossed the Atlantic on a flying lawn mower.

    • @ianbuchan1793
      @ianbuchan1793 5 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      D-Gauss but without passengers

    • @BigBango_01
      @BigBango_01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@ianbuchan1793 Pretty sure lawnmowers are a lot lighter than gas turbine yard trimmers

    • @MisteurCraft
      @MisteurCraft 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Well...
      - Passenger number is over 100 which means the plane is much heavier and having enough fuel can become a serious issue.
      - Lindbergh flight was really dangerous, FAA wants commercial planes to be as safe as possible. Meaning that whatever happens during flight the plane can still land safely.
      On moderne small twin engines, those issue were mainly solved by using new generation engines that features high fuel efficiency, thus defining new standards for those type of flights.

    • @jesperlett
      @jesperlett 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      He was the first who didn't die trying

    • @12345fowler
      @12345fowler 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is certainely no big deal, who told you that ?

  • @Oscar-ng1ue
    @Oscar-ng1ue 7 ปีที่แล้ว +407

    Can you talk more about long haul planes such as the 787, 777 and the new a350 XWB

    • @thomasg7255
      @thomasg7255 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I would be positively surprised about a video from Wendover that spends any longer amount of time covering Airbus planes.

    • @ezez4205
      @ezez4205 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Its XWB mate ;)

    • @uyhu24
      @uyhu24 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Xtra Wide Body that way you wont confuse it :P (im not sure if x is for xtra but wb seems simple enough)

    • @everythingthatrhymeswithsa3116
      @everythingthatrhymeswithsa3116 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The new one was showed before

    • @762rk95tp
      @762rk95tp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Honestly when it comes to kinda long haul planes A321LR, part of A320neo family might take this small planes long range thing to another level. Narrow body that can do a lot trans-Atlantic traffic. Doesn't go extreme distances A350, 787 or 777 can go, but still respectable 4000nmi.

  • @tabel4844
    @tabel4844 4 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    I wouldn't categorize the 787 as "small"

    • @wolfodonnell8515
      @wolfodonnell8515 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      It's certainly not small, but it is smaller than a 747 or 777.

    • @masonsilvers6789
      @masonsilvers6789 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I say it's big
      And if a plane wore pants, how would it wear them? (Yeah this is a reference to a HAI vid, and Sam (from wendover) owners HAI)

    • @the_bottomfragger
      @the_bottomfragger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      It's not small but if you see it next to 777, A340 or even A330 at the airport it really does seem small.

    • @KasabianFan44
      @KasabianFan44 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      BottomFragger
      The A330 is roughly the same size tho’

    • @NatureXwars
      @NatureXwars 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ppl seem to have forgotten about the 767 for comparison...

  • @robertbalazslorincz8218
    @robertbalazslorincz8218 4 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    ETOPS=
    Extended-range
    Twin engine
    Operational
    Standards
    Also ETOPS=
    Engines
    Turn
    Or
    Passengers
    Swim
    How convenient

    • @nonami_066xswqoqowiwl
      @nonami_066xswqoqowiwl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      S M A R T K I D
      VERY ORIGINAL COMMENT HUH? BITCHASS

    • @BB-lh1jg
      @BB-lh1jg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nonami_066xswqoqowiwl Why the hell you pissed?

    • @polishraspberries
      @polishraspberries 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nonami_066xswqoqowiwl he just copied what was in the video...
      what's wrong with that?

    • @VGF80
      @VGF80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You left out the word 'performance' below the word 'operational'

  • @kyleb3580
    @kyleb3580 7 ปีที่แล้ว +628

    I wish people would stop saying this guy has a plane fetish. He's likely a pilot or an aviation technition. He's passionate about it and that's awesome.

    • @f0rc3U
      @f0rc3U 7 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      Kyle B definitely not a pilot, as there have been some serious mistakes in the previous videos (eg that "most thrust is generated from the engine core")

    • @kyleb3580
      @kyleb3580 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      What video was that? I'm not doubting you, I just would like to see the video for context. It depends on what type of jet engine he was talking about. If he was talking about a turbojet engine, then he would be right as all of the thrust does indeed come from the core. However, if he was mentioning a turbofan engine, then you would be right as the core basically runs the fan, which generates about 80% of the thrust.

    • @5t757
      @5t757 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Kyle B He's neither mate he's only 19 years old

    • @kyleb3580
      @kyleb3580 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      My cousin is 16 and he's a pilot. What's your point?

    • @benjwgarner
      @benjwgarner 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      +Kyle B Even then it doesn't make sense. The core is the ONLY source of thrust in a turbojet (so "most" isn't appropriate). An extremely low bypass ratio turbofan could work like that, but the bypass ratio would have to be less than 1. I'm not sure if anything like that exists, except perhaps on some very early turbofan engines.

  • @heaneymusic
    @heaneymusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4443

    The plane fetish continues!
    *Don't stop.*

    • @elmozwrldtaken
      @elmozwrldtaken 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Ugh
      ugh
      ugh
      ugh

    • @glowmobile596
      @glowmobile596 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Joshua Heaney ;) ;) I like Planes and their shapes ;)

    • @hainguyen6514
      @hainguyen6514 7 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      yeah, just from these videos I realize how interesting aviation can be.

    • @dimaignatiev6370
      @dimaignatiev6370 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They keep reducing the plane engines amount for travel across the Atlantic,till one will crash to the ocean...

    • @ruk2023--
      @ruk2023-- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You have the wrong perception of this altogether. A single jet engine in the latest model range has the same power as all four engines on an early 747 so they don't need more engines to keep it moving and they are so reliable once up to cruising altitude that you or I will never see an engine failure even if we flew weekly for the rest of our lives. Most planes have done 15,000 cycles and hundreds of thousands of hours of flying time without a single engine failure.

  • @DanielSRosehill
    @DanielSRosehill ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brings back great memories of sitting in a field in Ireland with a VHF receiver listening to aircraft zooming overhead at FL350+ being handed off for their oceanic clearance. Never knew there were different ETOPS variants or how much they changed the world of travel. Fantastic video - thank you for putting it together!

  • @lewisdsd
    @lewisdsd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +238

    You should have mentioned the failure of the MD-11 as it was launched a few years before ETOPS certifications started.

    • @jameskoralewski3583
      @jameskoralewski3583 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Do you know what ETOPS stands for? Engine turning or pilot swimming.

    • @jameskoralewski3583
      @jameskoralewski3583 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Some 2 engine planes are ETOPS rated. Most 2 engine planes require a hydraulic driven electric generator to help provide electricity from the engine turning the aircrafts hydraulic pump if the power from one engine is lost. The ER designation at the rear of a planes type, like 777ER, usually means that the plane is certificated for EPOPS.

    • @texasabbott
      @texasabbott 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The MD-11 failed mostly because of maintenance costs for the tail-mounted engine, specialized onboard and hangar equipment needed to reach it (that stupid built-in tunnel, work platform and cradle to lower the engine). Its fuel efficiency is quite good once the Performance Improvement Package was introduced to restore its advertised range. If it had a carrying capacity similar to the 747-400, bigger wings with split scimitar winglets, it would have had a better chance at survival.

    • @Willaev
      @Willaev 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@jameskoralewski3583 "Most 2 engine planes require a hydraulic driven electric generator to help provide electricity"
      The APU (Auxiliary Power Unit) is not hydraulically driven, it's hydraulically started. Once it's started, it runs on regular jet fuel.

    • @dpm-jt8rj
      @dpm-jt8rj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TheCannonofMohammed
      FX still has the MD11s and the DC10s (with a major upgrade on the flight deck). They are just as expensive to work on though.

  • @kylenetherwood8734
    @kylenetherwood8734 7 ปีที่แล้ว +239

    I'm always surprised at how interested I get by these videos. Keep it up.

  • @CowHenry
    @CowHenry 7 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    Ha! Engines Turn Or Passenger Swim.
    Damn, smooth as fuck.

  • @realspacemodels
    @realspacemodels 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for explaining ETOPS. I have watched several videos of pilots in executive jets or even prop-driven planes doing the North Atlantic crossing. The route they take includes stops in Iceland and Greenland for refueling. In each of the videos they are in contact with the North Atlantic crossing Air Traffic Control - though there is NO radar service on most of the route - and have been asked if they are ETOPS certified. I did not know what that was until now. Great video!

  • @danikarathor7189
    @danikarathor7189 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The 767 is the first twin engine aircraft to fly across the Atlantic
    A300: am I a joke to you?

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He didn’t say it was the first plane to cross the Atlantic. It was the first plane to get ETOPS certification. The A300 operated under an ICAO 90 minute rule

  • @cathal341
    @cathal341 7 ปีที่แล้ว +523

    Just curious, do you have some education in aviation because you explain these videos extremely well? Or is your research process just that concrete? Either why I'm a bit of an aviation nut so these videos are super interesting to me so keep up the great work!

    • @cityuser
      @cityuser 7 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      It's just a lot of research, I highly doubt he has any special education.

    • @btafan11
      @btafan11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Actually, he skips a lot of research and his videos are riddled with errors. He's good at BS'ing

    • @manikrn007
      @manikrn007 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Can you cite an example please. I just subscribed. But if this is the case, I will definitely unsubscribe.

    • @btafan11
      @btafan11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      The title's wrong, for starters. Twin engines are used for planes of all sizes, not just "small" ones--it's like he forgot about the 777! His history of ETOPS and plane design is oversimplified, but I'm not going to bother analyzing it after I watched the one about why planes don't fly faster. That one was total garbage, he got the engines used on certain planes totally mixed up and said most of the thrust comes from the engine core as opposed to the bypass (plus many other glaring mistakes). And the ones where he analyzes plane revenue/costs are nonsense because he looks at just one example and then extrapolates everything from there.

    • @f0rc3U
      @f0rc3U 7 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      bta fan Yes, unfortunately you are 100% right. In the previous videos there were a lot of things that were absolutely wrong and badly researched, especially the point you mentioned with the thrust.
      However I really enjoy the videos, they are easy to watch and most of the things said are somewhat accurate.

  • @txrangerkidd222
    @txrangerkidd222 7 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Yay! I'm so happy you addressed the BAW A318 flight, I always wondered how they were allowed to fly such a small twin over water.

    • @Spursy1994
      @Spursy1994 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      txrangerkidd222 it's all business class seats too. That's why. They wouldn't be able to fly a full aircraft there

    • @williamfall2214
      @williamfall2214 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      txrangerkidd222 also the a318 is the largest aircraft that has the 9 degree landing glide slope certification required for London City airport

    • @cityuser
      @cityuser 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's a great idea, if you think about it. put business class in one plane, economy in another. though they have business/first in larger planes as well, but.. you get my pont.

    • @MultiSnout
      @MultiSnout 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      unfortunately it isn't quite described accurately... BA flies the A318 to/from NYC via Shannon, Ireland. it is not non-stop between London and New York.

    • @txrangerkidd222
      @txrangerkidd222 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      From my research, it only stops in Shannon in one direction, and I think that's from LCY to NY so it can take off light and refuel while giving the passengers the opportunity to clear customs early.

  • @darkmatter3237
    @darkmatter3237 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is the best channel I’ve ever subscribed to. Keep up the great work.

  • @darkstar795
    @darkstar795 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Holy.. this video was beautiful!!! So informative, smoothly narrated, 10/10 glad I subscribed.

  • @benuscore8780
    @benuscore8780 7 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    It's interesting that the person in the beginning isn't aware that there's a place called Hell in Norway, and it's pretty cold there, so technically, it's *already* a cold day in Hell.

    • @sion8
      @sion8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      There's also Hell, Michigan, I'm sure it gets​ cold there as well.

    • @wishuhadmyname
      @wishuhadmyname 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ben_ Arkansas is also sometimes called hell

    • @koolaidjammers2747
      @koolaidjammers2747 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      wildchicken007 isn't that another name for Detroit

    • @smithsoniannationalmemearc3250
      @smithsoniannationalmemearc3250 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *SEINFELD THEME INTENSIFIES*

    • @elchungo5026
      @elchungo5026 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Big Boke no, it's really a city with like 300 people in it

  • @5bscs
    @5bscs 7 ปีที่แล้ว +406

    I'VE CLEARLY WATCHED THIS 9 MINUTE VIDEO IN 3 MINUTES

    • @marciosilva6770
      @marciosilva6770 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hockey King 8:56! You ARE the fake news. Worse than CNN

    • @akabyfamily586
      @akabyfamily586 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Marcia Livia it's actually 8:57

    • @marciosilva6770
      @marciosilva6770 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why does it say 8:56 on my phone since you lot are getting 8:57?

    • @jeevad.tharan4179
      @jeevad.tharan4179 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Its 8:56 you all are FAKE NEWS

    • @mellow6725
      @mellow6725 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Marcio Silva it's 8:57, from what junkyard did you get your phone

  • @Rushmore222
    @Rushmore222 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    FAA: You can't fly transatlantic with only two engines.
    Charles Lindbergh: Hold my illegal beer.

  • @ejtipp4650
    @ejtipp4650 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dude, you make AWSOME videos! As an aviation enthusiast i just wanna let ya know i love what you do and thank you for it! Keep it up bro!

  • @Tyrannosaurus_Wrexx
    @Tyrannosaurus_Wrexx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    As an aviation freak, I LIVE for these types of Wendover Productions videos! I'm in my happy place

  • @candidcomment
    @candidcomment 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Fabulously Co-herent and informative explanation of ETOPS !
    Great speaking voice , without any amateur stutter , fade or intonation issues ! BRAVO !!!
    This Video is at the" Great End ' of TH-cam .

  • @BillCraven
    @BillCraven 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your videos have done more to help me understand the airline industry than years of reading the business pages. Keep it up!

  • @cementer4life
    @cementer4life 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love this channel. great vids filled with obviously researched info. keep em going

  • @multiio1424
    @multiio1424 7 ปีที่แล้ว +492

    OK, so someone needs to build an airport on the south pole so the A350 can legally fly there!

    • @bolmeinheign
      @bolmeinheign 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      multi io watch John Oliver's rant on visiting the south pole

    • @UhOhUmm
      @UhOhUmm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      There are airports on Antarctica that A350 could land on, the problem is with the passenger recovery and the fact that the weather is brutal there. Also it's dark 7 months of the year.

    • @dylan522p
      @dylan522p 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      A350 would probably break flying there

    • @davidhonkstvorisit4811
      @davidhonkstvorisit4811 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is ice and snow airports

    • @AUmarcus
      @AUmarcus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Australia will be building a tarmac runway at Davis Station on Antarctica in the next fews years.

  • @AceNallawar
    @AceNallawar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    you are the only TH-cam info-channel, which makes something I have never heard or seen

    • @iluvbaconOMG
      @iluvbaconOMG 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ace Nallawar life noggin.. asap science .. real life lore .. dumbass

    • @AceNallawar
      @AceNallawar 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      actually, most of the things they make, I already know, so, duh...

    • @afh7689
      @afh7689 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ace Nallawar Check out "Today I Found Out"

    • @CarrotConsumer
      @CarrotConsumer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ur so smart c:

    • @argis1342
      @argis1342 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know this is old, but try CGP Grey.

  • @nyceyes
    @nyceyes 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    These are very interesting and informative videos (take it from a technical person). Finally,... productions that are a race to the top, not to the bottom. Thank you for these wonderful videos. =:)

  • @marcuslanier1437
    @marcuslanier1437 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I applaud your making of this video, it is entertaining enough to keep attention, explains everything in more commonplace terminology, and is most certainly not anywhere near being boring, like an FAA video. I enjoyed this very much. Thank you for doing it.

  • @canadianplanespotter
    @canadianplanespotter 7 ปีที่แล้ว +272

    Air Canada uses an A319 trans-Atlantic? Thug life :)

    • @gregersen1926
      @gregersen1926 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Canadian Plane Spotter St. john's isn't a busy airport, I've been on that exact flight before.

    • @benhuang2773
      @benhuang2773 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Canadian Plane Spotter
      Norwegian plans to use the 737 Max on TATL.

    • @ON-YT
      @ON-YT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know you form somewhere

    • @CloroxBleach-um4gn
      @CloroxBleach-um4gn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      BA uses A318 from LCY- NY

    • @rubenkober
      @rubenkober 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BA operates A318 trans-Atlantic

  • @sfranger50
    @sfranger50 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What can I say ? I absolutely love it when I learn something about questions I have been asking myself for a long time. You demystified intercontinental airline routing for me. Thanks !

  • @boxysquare
    @boxysquare 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This answers every question I had going throuvh my mind when we were boarding the plane for Hawaii. Now I'll feel better on the trip back to the mainland. Thanks!!

  • @pierce5881
    @pierce5881 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos are some of the most well put together and informative videos on TH-cam. I hope you keep making content and branch out to all topics. I wish you made the documentaries we all had to watch in high school, I would have learned a lot more.

  • @TemplarOnHigh
    @TemplarOnHigh 7 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    ENGINES TURN OR PASSENGERS SWIM XD

    • @kostam.1113
      @kostam.1113 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ''Swim''

    • @farhanw3679
      @farhanw3679 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kosta M. K. Typos 4life

    • @AreDoWeSheIt
      @AreDoWeSheIt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TemplarOnHigh
      gmhjhgifyuft

  • @garethonthetube
    @garethonthetube 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A couple of other points to add to an excellent video.
    1. The engines are much more efficient now so small twins have a far greater range than they used to.
    2.If a second engine fails, it is statistically likely that it will be for the same reason as the first failure, so it could mean all 4 failing on a 747. There are a few instances of multi engine failures due to maintenance errors.

  • @fmn5917
    @fmn5917 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And by the way, hats down to you for knowing so well the ETOPS and aviation rules. If you don't have an aviation background, you are really really impressive

  • @JavierCR25
    @JavierCR25 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always wondered about tri jets! Great video!! Amazing how aviation changes in so little time!

  • @Shankovich
    @Shankovich 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm a performance engineer at Gulfstream. Awesome vid and well explained!!

  • @ericprice3225
    @ericprice3225 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just doing loads of research on this as the 787 I was on last week between London and Mexico City was diverted to Iceland after an engine failure. Within two hours I was on a bus to a hotel (2 hours drive away). Following day I was on a replacement plane continuing my journey while engineers worked on the failed aircraft.

  • @capwkidd
    @capwkidd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wondered why I saw "twins" att the international terminal at LAX... and had been wondering about this for sometime! Thanks for the video! Very enlightening!

  • @krisztiankormos2506
    @krisztiankormos2506 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This explained so much. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this amazing video for us.

  • @josefstalin9068
    @josefstalin9068 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    "This small rule is disrupting a multi-billion dollar industry"

  • @djlapio93litlebro
    @djlapio93litlebro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Now I feel safer to fly. Thanks Wendover Productions!

  • @thomasstarnes9943
    @thomasstarnes9943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Black Box Down for the recommendation!

  • @inspire518
    @inspire518 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude your videos are some of my favourite on youtube. Good job.

  • @brooksallen3174
    @brooksallen3174 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video was amazing! Great job! Love, Love, Love the airplane vids!

  • @FSXNOOB
    @FSXNOOB 7 ปีที่แล้ว +319

    NY to London with a A318??
    Like wtf... that's crazy ( and way to uncomfortable )

    • @bumblebee__
      @bumblebee__ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +151

      ᖴᔕ᙭ᑎOOᗷ - Gᗩᗰᕮᔕ & ᗰOᖇᕮ They use an A318 with an all-business configuration, so the passengets will be plenty comfortable.

    • @markuswendt4448
      @markuswendt4448 7 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      It's an way more expensive flight with only business class , it's for people who haven't the time to go to Heathrow which is located outside of the city and its less stress because the are not as many people like in Heathrow .

    • @Desertkid2000
      @Desertkid2000 7 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Yeah, but then you wouldn't be flying out of London City Airport!

    • @nikkustikku281
      @nikkustikku281 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Flugzeug Dokus You like the sound of crying babies a few feet back in economy?

    • @chrisbird1462
      @chrisbird1462 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Its actually more comfortable

  • @mra682
    @mra682 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video thanks for the upload. Clear audio and background effects were not overly dominant
    Thumbs up, i enjoyed it

  • @greatvedas
    @greatvedas 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow! Very useful information. Appreciate the efforts behind making this video.

  • @awabqureshi814
    @awabqureshi814 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    It's interesting that an Aeroplane video has the sponsor by name of "Hover"

    • @WeAreCamels
      @WeAreCamels 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      AAQsR Airplanes don't hover

    • @WeAreCamels
      @WeAreCamels 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** true

  • @bob2000and10
    @bob2000and10 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Respect for not dragging this out to 10 minutes when it didnt need to be

  • @JaximusDecimus1
    @JaximusDecimus1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos, man. Highly informative, to the point and entertaining. Keep up the good work.

  • @sammylegos1
    @sammylegos1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've binged roughly twenty of your videos and can't stop! Great channel.

  • @MidnightVisions
    @MidnightVisions 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There are individual variations to the ETOPS clearances. Some airlines like Aloha 737's flying in between Hawaii and mainland USA had to run their APU engines over the middle of the ocean to cover the emergency power backup requirements of ETOPS. Some airlines didn't have to follow those rules as ETOPS clearances are not set in stone but a variable based on past maintenance practices.

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That must have used a ton of extra fuel. Your practically using 3 engines then except one doesn't produce thrust

  • @danwood5163
    @danwood5163 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    "There was no place for long and skinny routes between smaller cities" Connecticut to Portugal, PORTUGAL IS MY CITY

    • @elweewutroone
      @elweewutroone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      England is my city
      America is my city
      Australia is my city
      Etc. Etc.

  • @JohnPurser99
    @JohnPurser99 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative, concise, excellent production values and best of all no 'drama'! - Thank you

  • @asd36f
    @asd36f 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fascinating and informative - I had never heard of ETOPS before.

  • @YoungTheFish
    @YoungTheFish 7 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    I like planes. Chu-chu~

    • @noob.168
      @noob.168 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I like boats. Beep Beep

    • @colbiesthename2875
      @colbiesthename2875 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Boats actually do have horns tho.

    • @Poifect
      @Poifect 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I like walking. Vroom-vroom~

    • @griytz64
      @griytz64 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like cars (Insert wha plane engines sound like)

    • @colbiesthename2875
      @colbiesthename2875 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kareth
      Brrrrrbrbrbrrrrrbrbbrbrbrbrbrrrr

  • @rohansroy
    @rohansroy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    God I love these videos! I never knew how much I loved airplanes, and the air service industry!

  • @pauljoshua768
    @pauljoshua768 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A really well explained documentary. I learnt so much. Thank you and good work!!

  • @vieuxbal1253
    @vieuxbal1253 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a fantastic job for explaining in such an easy way something that is in reality complicated for the average person. Maximum respect!!😊

  • @DOTCurrency
    @DOTCurrency 7 ปีที่แล้ว +342

    >regulations not adapting to improvements in technology
    color me surprised

    • @littlep2000
      @littlep2000 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      To be fair they are adapting, albeit slowly. Though if any regulatory body has some extremely strict rules I'm pretty okay with the ones that handle the sending of people through the sky at 500 mph to be fairly cranky.

    • @FreedomLovin
      @FreedomLovin 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Airlines themselves could handle all the regulations just fine on their own. The governmental regulations are just slowing progress and costing the airlines more money, which of course ends up with us paying more per ticket. If the government were not involved in regulating airlines, they would definitely do all of this themselves- because of the profit motive. One crash, and nobody would fly that airline, huge loss! Government regulations here are irrelevant and redundant, and clearly don't even work.

    • @stanleyguzman694
      @stanleyguzman694 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      DOTCurrency Lol k

    • @BikeHelmetMk2
      @BikeHelmetMk2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      "One crash, and nobody would fly that airline, huge loss!"
      While that might work for the huge domestic ones, keep in mind there's around 5000 airlines worldwide. Not all will self regulate as effectively as you hope. And if they did have a crash, wouldn't the smaller ones (with no reserve funds and inadequate liability insurance) simply shut the airline down, sell its assets to another company, repaint the sold clunker jets and relaunch?
      The government regulations also act as protections against foreign airlines, since competitors slacking significantly on maintenance and safety cannot even land on our continent, short of an emergency. They have to meet certain basic guidelines... it keeps the playing field a bit more level. But you're right, it does add to the cost and slow down innovation.

    • @VanBurenOfficial
      @VanBurenOfficial 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      DOTCurrency "meme arrow" "reddit"

  • @benmanning6649
    @benmanning6649 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    0:28 look at australia you couldn't fly over it in a twin engine plane

    • @soaringvulture
      @soaringvulture 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cute. Maybe they could do it under Australian rules.

    • @AndrewSteitz
      @AndrewSteitz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except that the FAA has no authority over flights in Australia. I also wonder if there are “unconventional” landing areas in the middle of the country that could serve as emergency landing sites.

  • @johnaroach
    @johnaroach 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great video! This answered many nagging questions I've had about plane configurations and routes for years. Thanks!

  • @kai84m
    @kai84m 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, I'm truly stunned - that's an awesome video. Really enjoyed it.

  • @jamespatrick8245
    @jamespatrick8245 7 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    WengerOut

    • @lucozade8373
      @lucozade8373 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      james patrick not here, pls

    • @OnkarPankanti_jr
      @OnkarPankanti_jr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      WendoverOut

    • @DanielHarris579
      @DanielHarris579 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      james patrick wenger in - Liverpool

    • @Poifect
      @Poifect 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wenger In! ~Bayern München

    • @owensproston1366
      @owensproston1366 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      who would want Wenger at all. he is crap

  • @AlphaGametauri
    @AlphaGametauri 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Twin jets might be able to start doing long haul water routes with Skillshare.

  • @Jay-hr3rh
    @Jay-hr3rh 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Long awaited video. Thanks.

  • @VanBurenOfficial
    @VanBurenOfficial 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is some of the best content on youtube, keep it up and tnanks.

  • @thienLong7
    @thienLong7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Any1 from the tiktok guy

  • @awuma
    @awuma 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'd love to fly across the Atlantic in a C-Series!

  • @nathanjaroszynski6210
    @nathanjaroszynski6210 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for sharing these videos about aviation. It's a really good place to start with understanding business, design and economy. Great!

  • @knightrider4261
    @knightrider4261 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well made video and super interesting. I always wondered what was needed to get ETOPS certified.

  • @edlcdmc
    @edlcdmc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    For airplane navigation, would you kindly use a globe instead of a flat map? The distortion makes comparing distances difficult

    • @koverpy426
      @koverpy426 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      At least it is not Mercator.

    • @prepperjonpnw6482
      @prepperjonpnw6482 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Get over it. You don’t need to compare distances while watching this video. Buy a globe yourself

    • @frostbitefgc155
      @frostbitefgc155 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What's your issue? It's a simple, polite request that would make the videos more easily digestible. Chill the fuck out.

    • @imhamish
      @imhamish 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This comment thread is so needlessly passive aggressive.

    • @TheCannonofMohammed
      @TheCannonofMohammed 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can ALL aviation enthusiasts PLEASE be friends? One planet, one people. We are ALL fellow passengers on this Space-Ship Earth (Gaia)!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @732lover
    @732lover 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Please do a video on the 737Max when enough information becomes available.

    • @soaringvulture
      @soaringvulture 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's already enough information available: the thing don't fly.

  • @mrcannotfindaname
    @mrcannotfindaname 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative, impressive delivery

  • @urlilsolja
    @urlilsolja 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love learning more and more about the airline industry! Wow i truly learned something today! Thank you!

  • @AoiShoudou
    @AoiShoudou 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a Chilean, I'm very excited for the wide range of possibilities that the 787 brings to the table. I'm hoping Santiago - Melbourne is the first of the many new routes that would be opened.
    Do you think with the new 350 would be posible to do a route from South America to Asia? Like Lima - Tokyo?

  • @AbudBakri
    @AbudBakri 7 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    I will prove all the people who say I can't fly in my homemade *IRONMAN* suit wrong!!!
    Transatlantic here I come!

    • @AbudBakri
      @AbudBakri 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Deal with it.

    • @AbudBakri
      @AbudBakri 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Do it. I'll hire LawyerStickFigure.

    • @astrum097
      @astrum097 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      hello ubiqutious one

    • @pet3590
      @pet3590 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dr.StickFigure is omnipresent, is he the real god?

    • @benjwgarner
      @benjwgarner 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Nah, the Iron Man suit has four engines: 2 in the feet and 2 in the hands.

  • @sydneylu4462
    @sydneylu4462 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos about aviation industry!

  • @Peccs91
    @Peccs91 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Totally makes sense! My dad and grandpa flew from California to Hawaii in the 80's on a 747 but, there were many empty seats, they were able to lay horizontal across entire rows of seats.

  • @ohauss
    @ohauss 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So the question remains, though, if the fact that so many new connections can be offered, rather than posing a risk over the ocean, doesn't provide a massive additional risk in the vicinity of the destination. If even planes from North America now fly to London City Airport, that does provide a certain risk of increased low-altitude air traffic over London and with that the statistical probability of a major accident, given that take-off and landing are the most accident-prone phases during a flight anyway. Will Savile Row be retailored by an airplane as a consequence one day?

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are rules about how many aircraft can be in the low sky for landing and takeoff at any one time and flight plans are coordinated to keep under that limit. If a delay or other factor over-crowds the sky outgoing planes stay on the tarmac and if absolutely necessary incoming planes are diverted (very rare as outside the most extreme circumstances just delaying takeoffs can prevent it getting that bad).

  • @BunsterByne
    @BunsterByne 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Here from Black Box Down

    • @flightsnotfeelings5867
      @flightsnotfeelings5867 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here even though I’ve watched so much more from Wendover. I highly recommend all of his videos.

  • @snowflake7836
    @snowflake7836 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another nice one from Wendover!

  • @OriolePublishing
    @OriolePublishing 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Informative, Insightful, Engaging, even for a layperson like myself. I'm enjoying EVERY SINGLE video so thanks for the videos!

  • @adityarao2827
    @adityarao2827 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    4:58 the mountain has a face :)

  • @gabrielsasala1875
    @gabrielsasala1875 7 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    I would hate to be on that Airbus A318 from New York to London.

    • @lizzsszzy7800
      @lizzsszzy7800 7 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      It's all Business class, which helps.

    • @vollelektrolysierer5773
      @vollelektrolysierer5773 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And even if it is a A318, it is long-haul business.

    • @CianMcsweeney
      @CianMcsweeney 6 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      It's actually a better experience than you'd get on a larger plane as it's all business class

    • @planeflight1202
      @planeflight1202 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      its all real buisness class seats exclusively for buisness travellers, so its like a routine private jet flight.

    • @randyf1059
      @randyf1059 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Imagine hitting a 150kts cross wind at mid flight

  • @parimal7528
    @parimal7528 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful & informative video. Thanks a lot for making it

  • @NZWolf
    @NZWolf 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this video. This is something i have wondered about for a while. You have enlightened my curious nature.

  • @TheOtherNeutrino
    @TheOtherNeutrino 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    7:05 Anyone thinking of citing the Airbus A340 as Airbus' other quad jet, it's not in production while the A380 is.

    • @sxfstrummer
      @sxfstrummer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's where my mind was going haha

    • @N0616JCProductions
      @N0616JCProductions 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IMO, I would rather have Airbus do more with their A380 than the A340 as I think that A380 is much better in terms of the looks than the A340. From what I can tell, the A340 is just a A330 with four hair dryers being used as engines....

    • @sirBrouwer
      @sirBrouwer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      N0616JC Productions the problem with the A380 is that for most airlines the size is just to big. especially for budget airlines who don't have hub systems but just fly directly to and from the actual destination.
      it's the same with the 747 they are also being cut down big time. they are like wise only used on the biggest routes and mostly used for there cargo capacity.

    • @FireboyHDGaming
      @FireboyHDGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      He says in production and the a340 isnt in production anymore

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@N0616JCProductions that's just the 200/300 versions which used CFM-56's. Modified 737 engines pretty much. The 500/600 use RR Trent 500 engines which are much more powerful

  • @jaguarsparks3986
    @jaguarsparks3986 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I never knew that the airbus family could cross the Atlantic Ocean. A318!! Thats incredible

    • @jameskoralewski3583
      @jameskoralewski3583 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      They usually don't use the A318, A320, or A321 airplanes on trips over the pond due to lower fuel capacity.

    • @RB747domme
      @RB747domme 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      JaguarSparks the A318 used by British Airways is a very special one, with larger fuel tanks and only 8 rows of four business class seats.
      It's all business class configuration, designed to land at London City Airport which is right next to the business downtown District avoiding the busy Heathrow which is 40 miles away.
      Also, on its way out from LCY it stops off at Shannon to refuel and get pre clearance for immigration so that by the time it lands in JFK it's a domestic flight. The business passengers literally walk off and go to baggage reclaim and straight out into their limos in literally 20 minutes.
      I've done it it's a lot of fun. It's actually a really comfortable flight to be on because it's so quiet and there's not that many passengers on board, with lie flat beds for all passengers.
      It's just like a large bizjet really.

    • @user-ky6vw5up9m
      @user-ky6vw5up9m 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If I am not mistaken, it uses the old BA Concorde flight number BA001

    • @InfiniteHorizons
      @InfiniteHorizons 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ian McGreevy Correct

  • @arnoldmayii3563
    @arnoldmayii3563 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video!! I learned a hell of alot from this, keep up the great work!!

  • @michaelpowers9259
    @michaelpowers9259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent. Loved it! Thanks!