Profitable Traders Use 20Δ Strangles... We Proved Why

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2024
  • Subscribe to our Second Channel: @tastylivetrending
    Check out more options and trading videos at www.tastylive.com!
    ======== tastylive.com ========
    tastylive is a real financial network, producing hours of live programming every day. Follow along as our experts navigate the markets, provide actionable trading insights, and teach you how to trade. With over 120 original segments, and over 25 personalities, we’ll help you take your trading to the next level, whether you are new to trading or a seasoned veteran.
    Follow us on Twitter: tastyliveshow
    Check out our Instagram: tastyliveshow
    tastylive content is created, produced, and provided solely by tastylive, Inc. (“tastylive”) and is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation that any security, futures contract, digital asset, other product, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any person. Trading securities, futures products, and digital assets involve risk and may result in a loss greater than the original amount invested. Investment information provided may not be appropriate for all investors and is provided without respect to individual investor financial sophistication, financial situation, investing time horizon or risk tolerance. Options, futures, and futures options are not suitable for all investors. Prior to trading securities, options, futures, or futures options, please read all applicable risk disclosures, including, but not limited to, the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options Disclosure and the Futures and Exchange Traded Options Risk Disclosure Statement.
    Past performance is not indicative of future results. Performance is not presented net of all commissions, fees, and expenses. Multi-leg option strategies incur higher transaction costs than single leg trades as they involve multiple commission charges. Examples provided are for illustrative, informational, and educational purposes only and are not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve. Supporting documentation for any claims (including claims made on behalf of options programs), comparisons, statistics, or other technical data, if applicable, will be supplied upon request.
    tastylive, through its content, financial programming or otherwise, does not provide investment or financial advice or make investment recommendations. tastylive is not a licensed financial adviser, registered investment adviser, or a registered broker-dealer. 
    tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with tastylive whereby tastytrade pays compensation to tastylive to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of tastylive by tastytrade. tastytrade and tastylive are separate, but affiliated, entities with their own products and services. tastylive is the direct parent company of tastytrade.

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @thetruesora2111
    @thetruesora2111 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What Tasty doesnt explain is the importance of delta rebalancing bands. A bad move against any short position that isnt ATM can go really bad as the gamma can ramp up exponentially on further OTM strikes.
    Have your min and max delta exposure in mind (ex. "I dont want more than +/- 20 deltas exposure"). The strangle starts delta neutral and you rebalance as it accumulates more than your 20 delta threshold.
    These are volatility bets and we shouldnt expect to be rewarded if we're wrong. ATM short straddles are more immediate in their feedback so while your POP is much lower, your max loss also tends to be much lower and your pnl is more evenly distributed vs a low delta strangle which can fool you with consistently positive avg and median pnl but the max loss can be devastating if you dont get to manage your position

  • @dshillda
    @dshillda 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Clear as day.

  • @theagemaway
    @theagemaway หลายเดือนก่อน

    For those interested, the math formula on the first slide is how to calculate a concept called "profit expectancy", simply meaning your average PNL over a large amount of winning and losing trades. It's really helpful if you are trying to determine if a particular strategy will be statistically profitable

  • @d.k.8187
    @d.k.8187 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for doing these! It would be interesting to know a bit more about what "15 years of data" means...e.g. Is that opening a trade once a day every day? And for future studies - (opening/closing at what time of day? - does it matter? - e.g. higher IV at the open? etc. OR what if you only opened at certain IVR levels? etc....🤓

  • @DougSmileyVirgo
    @DougSmileyVirgo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm an undefined risk scalper who trades ATM ZDTE options on trend days only. Yes, i'm a screen zombie.

  • @rickbate2164
    @rickbate2164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    got it simple

  • @amkr0068
    @amkr0068 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why is it that you guys don't use metrics like the Sharpe ratio, Calmar, or MAR?
    This is a serious question that I would like to see addressed.

    • @i486DX66
      @i486DX66 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Wrong audience.

  • @GordonGartrell
    @GordonGartrell 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Does this mean shortbthe 20delta put and shirt the 20 delta call?

  • @Eqnotalent
    @Eqnotalent 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish they do this for 0dte/1dte/7dte

  • @maxmachts135
    @maxmachts135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I use the formula from slide2 and cross-check the 1st column of slide3, I don't understand it:
    0.64*197 - (1-0.64)*302 = 17.36
    which is not the avrg P/L noted as 32.10
    Not sure if I'm missing something but I don't understand these numbers 😢

    • @michaeltaylor3588
      @michaeltaylor3588 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree with you. No idea how they're coming up with the avg P/L numbers. Therefore makes you mistrust the analysis & conclusions.

  • @gbinman
    @gbinman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I appreciate the study. Question is the study was done with SPY, does that mean the other underlyings will respond the same way?

    • @pilotstefan1322
      @pilotstefan1322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Other research confirms similar underlying all perform similar and the pricing model is extremely accurate. SPY / QQQ / IWM that is. There is far bigger differences in stocks though with more erratic results

    • @gbinman
      @gbinman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pilotstefan1322 You said it, other indices may work but individual stocks may not. No surprise as indices are averaging performance of individual stocks.

    • @RealTradesStockMarket
      @RealTradesStockMarket 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No way, don’t do it! This only applies to SPY, I don’t care what they say. Learn from my mistakes. Also, 20 Delta is far too aggressive.

    • @mikeb5664
      @mikeb5664 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Look for Tasty videos that discuss correlation.

  • @icenomad99
    @icenomad99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anything higher than 7 deltas on strangles is plainly stupid.

  • @icenomad99
    @icenomad99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    No they don't. Traders who want to bust their account use 20 delta strangles. NO-ONE but Tastytrade trades 20 delta strangles. They are way too close to the money. Tasty wants you to trade them because they want you to roll sides and do lots of other stupid stuff to churn commissions and turnover. Most profitable strangles are 6/7 Deltas. Countless people blew up their accounts trading the "Tasty trade way"

    • @pilotstefan1322
      @pilotstefan1322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I 100% agree with you, i sell 5-7 delta strangles on various futures underlyings, close at 50% profit or 200% stop loss, has an average 90% win rate and i get around 50% returns on my account each year. Its simple but it works!

    • @mohgujai
      @mohgujai 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you saying less than .1 delta? 0.05 - 0.07 delta you're still risking it for pennies. Is it even worth it?

    • @pilotstefan1322
      @pilotstefan1322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mohgujai 5-7 delta not 0.05-0.07delta. on SPY 5-7delta strangle wouldnt get you much premium but on the futures equivalent ES which is leveraged further and uses span margin you get significantly more premium for a similar BP usage. That said ES is my exception, I just sell naked puts at 5-7 delta, leave on for 8 weeks and average 500 dollars on just under 4k margin so 12.5% return in 8 weeks. My strangles are on CL / ZN / ZB / GC / 6A /6E all placed at 70-90dte, added every week on each upto 3 max on each underlying. Usually reach 50% profit in 15-25days average.

    • @DP52001
      @DP52001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pilotstefan1322you mean a .05 or .07, correct? SPY? Premiums are super low, but if turned quickly, you are right! Big annual profits and basically always winners…

    • @bharatboy10
      @bharatboy10 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pilotstefan1322what dte and what underlying are best for strangles on futures?

  • @jackbarhillel1065
    @jackbarhillel1065 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What d'you mean 10Δs wide? You get a strangle at 20 Δs (alright) and then make it 10 Δ wide, the hell you mean by that? No that was a condor. I see. 20 Δ condor with 10 Δ wings. I'm just not convinced volatility is always the same here. You should cut it up volatility-wise. Precentiles 10-15% IV, 15-20% IV, 20-25% IV, 25-30. Close positions at 21 DTE and/or 10%, 25%, 50% max gain. Or else it makes no sense. Just too unrealistic. And what for 0DTEs and futures... How abouthe NASDAQ.. Am I making sense here?

  • @lilc2487
    @lilc2487 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your honor she looked 25

  • @lilc2487
    @lilc2487 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Naked puts can be a bad hit... so I hear

  • @RealTradesStockMarket
    @RealTradesStockMarket 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    20 delta Strangles in SPY!!! You say these carry over to stocks in general, but they don’t. I like you guys, but I lost a 💩-ton of money in the 21-22 Bear Market because of your bad advice. Plus back-testing active trading.

    • @mikeb5664
      @mikeb5664 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most people who trade options lose money.