Thank you, Marco for what you say towards the end about speaking up. This is extremely important. People repeatedly make points like “there’s a silent majority on the side of Israel in the UK”. So what?
People like Varfoukis have normalized VERY extremist ideologies to the point that talking about dissolving a sovereign nation and openly lying about it to do so is considered regular every day conversation
@@morgancarter3413thanks, Morgan. Since i missed the first part of the stream i'm not sure which clip is the one claiming copyright. Guess I'll have to watch it again. 😂
Pretty sure Ayn Rand wasn't a libertarian. 🤔 Also, and I know I'm pushing it to the extreme (although it's sadly not that far off), but it's to see if the principle holds: If Goebbles was still around, would you allow for his propaganda to be spread far and wide because "muh libertarianism"? I'm genuinely curious about your answer, btw.
@dannyarcher6370 That's somewhat of a good point, but was most of Goebbles' work focused on inciting violence or rather more focused on creating a machine of lies in order to demonize the Jewish people in order to justify the violence (which was committed by other branches of the third reich)? If he didn't incite to violence, would you have welcomed his machine of lies into your society? Can't you see that AlJazeera is *literally* an arm of a totalitarian and theocratic regime? Which is the same regime that hosts Hamas leaders and sends money to people who then do the violence for them? Can't you see that (even if we take the hamas executioners out of the equation) that the machine of lies still has an impact on both Israel's enemies and allies, therefore determining a diplomatic atmosphere that still puts the lives of Israelis at serious risk? And you are OK with agents of this branch of the Qatari regime to comfortably plot the demonization of israel while still being eligible for medical treatment at the expense of the Israel's taxpayers? Frankly, I see this as actual madness. I mean, for how long will we manage to remain this naive, before this attitude turns us into subjects of regimes that operate on principles that are exponentially worse than the ones we are trying to avoid by being this "libertarian" (in all the wrong aspects)?
Israel is at war with Ham-as. It has every right to shut down any entity which peddles propaganda against its interest (and ultimately Israeli's lives). It is no longer an issue of freedom of speech.
![[LIVE] นาทีนี้ต้องพี่ทนาย | ทนายแก้ว vs ทนายไพศาล | #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.47 (02/11/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HmquaO-PL_M/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you, Marco for what you say towards the end about speaking up. This is extremely important. People repeatedly make points like “there’s a silent majority on the side of Israel in the UK”. So what?
I would ban it forever! Lies are not information.
If the Israeli government wants Jews to make Aliyah, they need to walk the walk and talk the talk of never again.
I went out without a mask and without an exempt sign.
Razi i sure hope you had that awesome grin going when you pointed to your exempt button.
People like Varfoukis have normalized VERY extremist ideologies to the point that talking about dissolving a sovereign nation and openly lying about it to do so is considered regular every day conversation
Was this deleted, or what? I saw part of this live, but don't know if it's edited.
It was taken down for copyright. This has the offending video edited out.
@@morgancarter3413thanks, Morgan. Since i missed the first part of the stream i'm not sure which clip is the one claiming copyright. Guess I'll have to watch it again. 😂
Al Jazeera Pinocchio's cousin
when it's lies, it's not information.
Wait. I thought we were libertarians? I'm pro-Israel btw.
Pretty sure Ayn Rand wasn't a libertarian. 🤔
Also, and I know I'm pushing it to the extreme (although it's sadly not that far off), but it's to see if the principle holds:
If Goebbles was still around, would you allow for his propaganda to be spread far and wide because "muh libertarianism"?
I'm genuinely curious about your answer, btw.
@@magnumopus1628 I mean, Goebbels breached the "incitement to violence" principle, didn't he? I haven't seen any of that from Al Jazeera.
@dannyarcher6370
That's somewhat of a good point, but was most of Goebbles' work focused on inciting violence or rather more focused on creating a machine of lies in order to demonize the Jewish people in order to justify the violence (which was committed by other branches of the third reich)?
If he didn't incite to violence, would you have welcomed his machine of lies into your society?
Can't you see that AlJazeera is *literally* an arm of a totalitarian and theocratic regime?
Which is the same regime that hosts Hamas leaders and sends money to people who then do the violence for them?
Can't you see that (even if we take the hamas executioners out of the equation) that the machine of lies still has an impact on both Israel's enemies and allies, therefore determining a diplomatic atmosphere that still puts the lives of Israelis at serious risk?
And you are OK with agents of this branch of the Qatari regime to comfortably plot the demonization of israel while still being eligible for medical treatment at the expense of the Israel's taxpayers?
Frankly, I see this as actual madness.
I mean, for how long will we manage to remain this naive, before this attitude turns us into subjects of regimes that operate on principles that are exponentially worse than the ones we are trying to avoid by being this "libertarian" (in all the wrong aspects)?
Israel is at war with Ham-as. It has every right to shut down any entity which peddles propaganda against its interest (and ultimately Israeli's lives). It is no longer an issue of freedom of speech.
Guess it is turning into a longer war for you to cover