I love this format. It really brings home how all the choices of camera angles, costumes, performances, etc. are designed to have an emotional effect on us. In this case, dread. I would love to see more videos to see how directors evoke other emotions, like joy, or rage, or love.
I saw The Silence of the Lambs at a local theater when it was released in 1991 while I was still in the Marine Corps. My duty station at the time was Quanitico. The FBI Academy itself is in the middle of a large USMC base called The Basic School. That was where I was stationed. So, I did my many of my trail jogs on the same course shown at the start of the film. I definitely felt the establishing male dominance vibe throughout the first half of the movie and especially when Hannibal Lecter made a few lewd comments about it to Clarice. Being that I was watching the movie at the closest public movie theater to the FBI Academy, I distinctively remember thinking about how many in the audience were also FBI personnel and if the females among those identified with Clarice. It was certainly surreal. The irony is that Buffalo Bill is a male who wants to metamorphosize into a female. (Hence, the moth symbolism, as Lecter eventually points out to Clarice.)
Wow, that was fantastic! I've watched a lot of your other videos trying to improve my own techniques but always long for more in-depth analysis so I can learn the more subtle things. It makes me want to watch Silence of the Lambs again to see it through this new lens! Very interesting their use of color, and pre-color grading that's so easy for anyone to do now. Thanks a lot for taking the time to make this, I hope the series does well!
This was an incredibly intelligent, and informative, breakdown of so many aspects of the film that many of the audiences possibly weren't aware of that made them engage so much in what they were watching. Really insightful piece of work, thank you so much.
Once again brilliant video. Love the explanations of shot by shot, director's intentions and gravity of scenes... Thank you for this video... Fingers crossed for this series to continue. Waiting for next one:)
Now you made me want to watch it again, but it's WAY past bedtime here so it'll have to wait. I've loved this movie since its release, and it's quite possibly my favorite movie of all time. The tone and bleak atmosphere, combined with Hopkins' portrayal of Lecter, is just perfection! I know some people have the opinion that he's overdoing it (in comparison to Brian Cox's version in Manhunter) but Hopkins' Lecter will always be one of the greatest and most terrifying movie villains in my book.
I really enjoyed your commentary with many of your insights further endearing this film to me. Funny that many of the decisions by the people involved in the making of this film fostered in me the very emotions you describe. Great to reflect on a masterpiece of cinematography IMO where many recent films lack even the basic skills shown here. Thanks!
I found out your channel recently and been watching your videos they are a great help keep up the work G , also can you make a list of best indian cinematography movies specially old ones
Brilliant analysis. Dr Chilton is so cocksure and creepy. The acting in this film is exemplary. The film is perhaps a little forgotten now, given how significant it was at the time.
Great vid!! I want to add that I think one of the main purposes of how the camera moves and such in the opening, has a lot to do with establishing Clarice in threatening, difficult environments and how steady, poised she always remains. How she meets everything head on without hesitation. The obstacle course, navigating her way to Crawford's office....all of the men etc, etc. She hardly flinches or ever seems uncomfortable or....weak in any way. Physically and mentally. Her getting in that elevator, she does it with the utmost....swag....confidence....she doesn't shrink up or seem intimidated in the least. It's as if she almost....stands tall and puffs her chest out deliberately others look at her and question her....fearless attitude.
Great insight Wolfcrow! Can I ask what are your thoughts on the cinematographer Mauro Fiore (Avatar, Real Steel, Training Day, Spider-Man: No Way Home)?
Definitely one of my favourite videos of yours. Please do more. The film school I went to was more focused on the trades side of things than the art of cinematography so this was incredibly valuable to me. Generally when choosing shots I'm pretty amateurish -- I think in terms of effect with regards to tension (wides for more relaxed moments, tights for intense moments), which just feels limiting and repetitive. There's a lot more depth in what's shown here. If you're taking requests... you mentioned Seven. Any chance you could break down something from Fincher?
Yes, more camera-as-narrative analysis like this. Maybe on a Fincher film... or, since you've looked at it before, an action flick like Mission Impossible-- but, for its narrative choices.
There are very few perfect movies, but this is one of them--the acting, directing, the story, etc., are all brilliant. Also an excellent adapttion of a novel which is very hard to pull off, Lastly the cinematography is done by Tak Fujimoto, who is amazing at his craft!
YES! Please! Even for us "keen amateurs"! I'd be especially interested in camera placement (i.e., staging). I do not understand how one gets shiting 180s without seeing the camera etc.. Is the blocking changed? The staging? Both? Different lenses? I hope I made this question clear. :0) We never see the camera (which we shoudn't), yet the character angels seem to change without and distortion or parallax etc..
@@wolfcrow It's even more amazing to me than being as the dialog, lighting, color temp, shot angles, et al., are maintained shot-to-shot! I guess that's why they are called professional cinematographers! :0)))
Well... when I started watching your new format, I originally thought - 36 minutes? Is this guy out of his mind? ;) And yeah, I still think this new format would be even better if it could somehow be squeezed into 20 minutes or so :) That said, I found this format the most interesting of all the ones you've already posted - and they were very insightful, too (love the classic samurai movies explained! :) So I'm looking forward to seeing more of this - and if you ask me: not necessarily as an analysis of a particular movie like this one, but let's say - mixing your previous videos with this new format. And just as an example: how the cinematographers reveals the character of the person thru the given scenes/camera angles/color grading/etc. like you did here showing the first 4 males she meets in the first scenes of the movie :) Great work though and awaiting next chapters! Cheers!
when Jodi is off center at the 29 minute mark, what he is saying is DEFINITELY affecting her because she gulps nervously. so the offset framing is intentionally done to build up the claustrophobic feeling she has.
Came here because i thought your Amelie review was good. Started watching this and suddently it gets into overthinking mode. Its not that you might not be right about some of your conclusions but the exagerated focus on fleeting subjects only illustrate the amount of effort it took to make the review and not a welll balance overview of the psychological and relevant data rhat makes this movie great. btw, the ambiance music behind the voice-over is great.
at 2:20 where starling meets a person in a yellow vest and says "yes sir" is no indication at all. She could be a full Special Agent and the person she is talking to is a section or department head. However, the FBI Academy badge on her shirt and the fact she is clearly running a course would suggest she is in training at the academy.
Content Wolf- Wolfcrow- I have seen u in kerala thrissur- for Pulikali - But was unavailable to reach u due to the rush- all the best for the new series ❤
they wanted to make sequel to this film but jodie said she will do it only if jonathan demme directed it. then juliian moore took this role and ridley scott directed it.
She is always dressed conservatively, even her hair is under control. The men on the elevator are all bigger than her, and the red color is an action color, while she is dressed like freshman at an all women’s Catholic college. She is the innocent lamb, “Behold I send you out as sheep in the mist of wolves; therefore be shrewd as serpents, and innocent as doves.”
Don’t forget about race brother. The male figure that actually shows warmth and concern literally cannot help within this system, even though he wants to.
Engrossing film. It deserves (your) attention. I must say, though - Your lexiconal usage & conceptual framing is off putting. I think sex / power intersectionality is intrinsically flawed. It is the foamy dross of a bad idea. Knowi'msayin?
I love this format. It really brings home how all the choices of camera angles, costumes, performances, etc. are designed to have an emotional effect on us. In this case, dread.
I would love to see more videos to see how directors evoke other emotions, like joy, or rage, or love.
Thank you!
I saw The Silence of the Lambs at a local theater when it was released in 1991 while I was still in the Marine Corps. My duty station at the time was Quanitico. The FBI Academy itself is in the middle of a large USMC base called The Basic School. That was where I was stationed. So, I did my many of my trail jogs on the same course shown at the start of the film.
I definitely felt the establishing male dominance vibe throughout the first half of the movie and especially when Hannibal Lecter made a few lewd comments about it to Clarice. Being that I was watching the movie at the closest public movie theater to the FBI Academy, I distinctively remember thinking about how many in the audience were also FBI personnel and if the females among those identified with Clarice. It was certainly surreal.
The irony is that Buffalo Bill is a male who wants to metamorphosize into a female. (Hence, the moth symbolism, as Lecter eventually points out to Clarice.)
I always thought her teacher (Scott G.) was admirable in his treatment of her as a student worthy of respect, and not as an object. GREAT VIDEO.
Thank you!
This is easily my favourite film of all time. Truly a masterpiece.
Her boss is actually good to her and treats her respectfully, he sees her talent and pushes her to be her best.
He uses her as bait ? Manipulates her with the sudo promise of what she wants, whilst baiting and presenting her as prey or a fascination for lecture.
Wow, that was fantastic! I've watched a lot of your other videos trying to improve my own techniques but always long for more in-depth analysis so I can learn the more subtle things. It makes me want to watch Silence of the Lambs again to see it through this new lens!
Very interesting their use of color, and pre-color grading that's so easy for anyone to do now. Thanks a lot for taking the time to make this, I hope the series does well!
You're very welcome!
Never stop this series 🥺
This was an incredibly intelligent, and informative, breakdown of so many aspects of the film that many of the audiences possibly weren't aware of that made them engage so much in what they were watching. Really insightful piece of work, thank you so much.
You’re welcome!
This is so well researched/thought-out, presented and narrated. Thank you for liberally sharing your knowledge!
Hey Wolfcrow! I love your great film analyses, I really hope you find time to make more! - All the best - Martin
Thanks, will do!
Thank you. Your insights are very helpful. Please continue, and I look forward to more videos from you.
Thank you! Will do!
Excellent film analysis. Thank you for your insight.
Once again brilliant video.
Love the explanations of shot by shot, director's intentions and gravity of scenes...
Thank you for this video... Fingers crossed for this series to continue.
Waiting for next one:)
Wow.
I love your in depth analysis providing a surprizing new angle!
I feel motivated to rewatch this film. Thanks!
Glad you enjoyed it!
new wolfcrow just dropped
I love these analysis videos! Brilliant job, as always ;)
Thank you!
Interesting breakdown. Other movies to consider breaking down:
1. Shawshank redemption
2. The book of Eli
3. The Platform
Now you made me want to watch it again, but it's WAY past bedtime here so it'll have to wait. I've loved this movie since its release, and it's quite possibly my favorite movie of all time. The tone and bleak atmosphere, combined with Hopkins' portrayal of Lecter, is just perfection! I know some people have the opinion that he's overdoing it (in comparison to Brian Cox's version in Manhunter) but Hopkins' Lecter will always be one of the greatest and most terrifying movie villains in my book.
I really enjoyed your commentary with many of your insights further endearing this film to me. Funny that many of the decisions by the people involved in the making of this film fostered in me the very emotions you describe. Great to reflect on a masterpiece of cinematography IMO where many recent films lack even the basic skills shown here. Thanks!
Very nice this explanation about the film, gives you a different view of the film. Keep up the good work with more episodes like this
Thank you very much!
Really well done man.
2:37
OH My Gosh... YOU are Right...
"Silence of the Lambs" and "Se7en" are alike... I never thought of it that way...
I found out your channel recently and been watching your videos they are a great help keep up the work G , also can you make a list of best indian cinematography movies specially old ones
Brilliant analysis. Dr Chilton is so cocksure and creepy. The acting in this film is exemplary. The film is perhaps a little forgotten now, given how significant it was at the time.
Great vid!! I want to add that I think one of the main purposes of how the camera moves and such in the opening, has a lot to do with establishing Clarice in threatening, difficult environments and how steady, poised she always remains. How she meets everything head on without hesitation. The obstacle course, navigating her way to Crawford's office....all of the men etc, etc. She hardly flinches or ever seems uncomfortable or....weak in any way. Physically and mentally. Her getting in that elevator, she does it with the utmost....swag....confidence....she doesn't shrink up or seem intimidated in the least. It's as if she almost....stands tall and puffs her chest out deliberately others look at her and question her....fearless attitude.
very interesting to watch, this is so detailed look on cinematic approach. pleasing voice and interesting context presentation
Great insight Wolfcrow! Can I ask what are your thoughts on the cinematographer Mauro Fiore (Avatar, Real Steel, Training Day, Spider-Man: No Way Home)?
Wow, so much thought into these movies.
Thank you for this detail analysis learn a lot
Definitely one of my favourite videos of yours. Please do more. The film school I went to was more focused on the trades side of things than the art of cinematography so this was incredibly valuable to me. Generally when choosing shots I'm pretty amateurish -- I think in terms of effect with regards to tension (wides for more relaxed moments, tights for intense moments), which just feels limiting and repetitive. There's a lot more depth in what's shown here.
If you're taking requests... you mentioned Seven. Any chance you could break down something from Fincher?
Sure, I’ll try. Seven is one of my favorites too.
What an explanation 🫰🏻
Great Analysis 🎬
Thank you!
Yes, more camera-as-narrative analysis like this. Maybe on a Fincher film... or, since you've looked at it before, an action flick like Mission Impossible-- but, for its narrative choices.
There are very few perfect movies, but this is one of them--the acting, directing, the story, etc., are all brilliant. Also an excellent adapttion of a novel which is very hard to pull off, Lastly the cinematography is done by Tak Fujimoto, who is amazing at his craft!
YES! Please! Even for us "keen amateurs"! I'd be especially interested in camera placement (i.e., staging). I do not understand how one gets shiting 180s without seeing the camera etc.. Is the blocking changed? The staging? Both? Different lenses? I hope I made this question clear. :0) We never see the camera (which we shoudn't), yet the character angels seem to change without and distortion or parallax etc..
The scenes and shots are recreated meticulously for each camera angle. It's all part of the skills involved in cinematography and camera blocking.
@@wolfcrow It's even more amazing to me than being as the dialog, lighting, color temp, shot angles, et al., are maintained shot-to-shot! I guess that's why they are called professional cinematographers! :0)))
Outstanding👍👍
Oh man thank you for fixing your audio its way better now
Me gustó mucho, he estado muy desanimado y no he querido volver a escribir. Cuando veo tus videos me lleno de energía.
Brilliant ❤
Well... when I started watching your new format, I originally thought - 36 minutes? Is this guy out of his mind? ;) And yeah, I still think this new format would be even better if it could somehow be squeezed into 20 minutes or so :)
That said, I found this format the most interesting of all the ones you've already posted - and they were very insightful, too (love the classic samurai movies explained! :) So I'm looking forward to seeing more of this - and if you ask me: not necessarily as an analysis of a particular movie like this one, but let's say - mixing your previous videos with this new format.
And just as an example: how the cinematographers reveals the character of the person thru the given scenes/camera angles/color grading/etc. like you did here showing the first 4 males she meets in the first scenes of the movie :)
Great work though and awaiting next chapters! Cheers!
Thank you! I’ll try to make them shorter.
This director just need to make this one film in his life time and he will be remembered for generations 😂
😂Yes mastery achieved in first film
when Jodi is off center at the 29 minute mark, what he is saying is DEFINITELY affecting her because she gulps nervously. so the offset framing is intentionally done to build up the claustrophobic feeling she has.
Came here because i thought your Amelie review was good. Started watching this and suddently it gets into overthinking mode. Its not that you might not be right about some of your conclusions but the exagerated focus on fleeting subjects only illustrate the amount of effort it took to make the review and not a welll balance overview of the psychological and relevant data rhat makes this movie great.
btw, the ambiance music behind the voice-over is great.
at 2:20 where starling meets a person in a yellow vest and says "yes sir" is no indication at all. She could be a full Special Agent and the person she is talking to is a section or department head. However, the FBI Academy badge on her shirt and the fact she is clearly running a course would suggest she is in training at the academy.
Content Wolf- Wolfcrow- I have seen u in kerala thrissur- for Pulikali - But was unavailable to reach u due to the rush- all the best for the new series ❤
Next time!
@@wolfcrow Thank 4 The reply- hope u will do videos about malayalam movies and the cinematographers from india especially- from kerala 🤗🙌
My favorite movie ever
❤
they wanted to make sequel to this film but jodie said she will do it only if jonathan demme directed it. then juliian moore took this role and ridley scott directed it.
The sequel didn’t work for me at all.
What's a wideo?😅
She is always dressed conservatively, even her hair is under control. The men on the elevator are all bigger than her, and the red color is an action color, while she is dressed like freshman at an all women’s Catholic college. She is the innocent lamb, “Behold I send you out as sheep in the mist of wolves; therefore be shrewd as serpents, and innocent as doves.”
chetta malayali ahno ?
Just left audio channel
Its my head phones...
MOST pseudo-filmmakers on YT don’t have the courage OR vision to create something original and go solo to see it through…
I could feel Clarice's emotions being a woman. She had creeps ogle her like the keeper of Hannibal
दान्यवा अच्छा वीडियो था
Isn't there something that's being over-interpreted here?
Don’t forget about race brother. The male figure that actually shows warmth and concern literally cannot help within this system, even though he wants to.
Promo'SM
Engrossing film.
It deserves (your) attention.
I must say, though -
Your lexiconal usage & conceptual framing is off putting. I think sex / power intersectionality is intrinsically flawed. It is the foamy dross of a bad idea.
Knowi'msayin?
its not
great video but it is not a horror movie, its a thriller.
Hello, sir. It's my one of favorite movie, but didn’t feel the way how you felt. What a shame for me! Whatever.