Archaeologists Found the World's Oldest Wooden Building
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ค. 2024
- Archaeologists have found the oldest known wooden structure in the world. Wooden tools and logs alongside the Kalambo River reveal the intelligence of ancient humans.
#youngearth #humanevolution #creationist #ancientmysteries #archaeologicalfindings
Sources:
Barham, L., et al. 2023. Evidence for the earliest structural use of wood at least 476,000 years ago. Nature, 622:107-111.
Schick, K. 1992. Geoarchaeological Analysis of an Acheulean Site at Kalambo Falls, Zambia. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 7(1):001-026
Image Credits:
Wood Artifacts - Barham, L., et al. 2023. Evidence for the earliest structural use of wood at least 476,000 years ago. Nature, 622:107-111. creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Map of Kalambo Falls/Achulean Occupation Floor - Schick, K. 1992. Geoarchaeological Analysis of an Acheulean Site at Kalambo Falls, Zambia. Geoarchaeology, 7(1):001-026.
"Model of Homo erectus man in The Natural History Museum, Vienna" - Jakub Halun, commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..., creativecommons.org/licenses/...
"Kalambo falls at Rukwa Region Tanzania" - Humphrey Kaburu, commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi..., creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Kalambo Falls Site - Larry Barham and Geoff Duller, www.bbc.com/news/science-envi... - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Wow that took a crazy right turn I was not expecting at 4:34 😂
same
Can’t believe they call it the Livingston Museum in Africa 🤦🏻
Sounds like a flood occurred. Hmmmm.
Shoutout boofing ketamine. Shoutout smoking DMT.
I am god, you are god, we are all god...😂🙃😂
He says the wood was too old to be dated by carbon-14 dating. How is it known that the wood was too old, or is that just an assumption?
Only certain things can be dated due to age but if they can’t date it, it means it’s to old to do so or is in very terrible condition but typically just age
@@RanEdgar-ok3wk Actually NOTHING can be dated accurately. All dating methods are based upon assumptions. The only real way to know how old something is, is for a witness to have been there to see when the item was formed. Otherwise, it is similar to a person's own age; there is no fool-proof method for determining a person's age. We can measure a person's weight, height, temperature, blood pressure, etc., but not a person's age. The only way a person knows their age is because their parents were there to document it (and from a birth certificate).
You’re saying may or whatever but you and them don’t know nothing about them do not guess like they guess if they tell lies you tell lies 😅boy you’re still young look for something else to do someone lied to you about you can tell story you voice don’t help you 😅😅
I'm not sure if what you typed is English, if you're having a stroke, or are just disillusioned but it's impossible to understand what you're trying to say.
creationist rubbish.
Explain why the sun looks so young if it is billions of years old.
@@sabhishek9289 that's like comparing an elephant to an ant, what lives longer? and why does it look so young to the other?
@@zerodelta_9804 That is a faulty analogy fallacy. It is nothing like comparing an elephant to an ant. The Sun should appear much older than the Earth considering that without the sun, there can be no life on Earth. Yet the scientific data says that the sun appears to be around 6000 years old and not billions of years old according to a deep time believing astronomer.
6000 years old? Seriously, do some research into the topic. The age of the sun is pretty well documented. Also, I have no idea what you mean by it looking young. How can you determine the age of a star by looking at it? We use radioactive dating to determine it. Read a book that isn't the Bible. Respectfully. Like you can believe what you want to believe, but you shouldn't go around spreading your dogma as though it's fact. It damages real discussions and science. I'm not even going to argue with you because I'm assuming you're an adult who isn't very impressionable anymore and your tree of misinformation seems firmly rooted.
@@sabhishek9289 😂 just so you know I’m laughing at you not with you 😂
So, how old is it really?
On a young earth timescale, it would roughly fall between 2300 and 1900 BC.
@@NewCreationClips Keep up the good work.