Love this! It's great to be able to actually show them the FACE to the Dimensions Founder! Thank you for doing this!!! I teach Intercultural Communication class and will definitely use!
THANK YOU FOR THESE VIDEOS! I watched all 6 of dimensions! Truly helped me with info for my Intercultural Class I teach! THANK YOU! Was cool to actually hear it from the creator! =)
As a member of Long term orientation society, I try to remember the rich content of LTO implications in two lines of logic for my culture. One is that Future and change: To face the future means to face change and needs accommodation and adjustment. Two is that Morality vs truth. Morality such as humbleness, willing to learn, is more important than absolute truth, for truth is relative, which justify the way middle way between extreme solutions.
This is definitely the most difficult one to understand. Here in the UK it comes out as 51 which means that you can't make a determination one way or the other, which sort of explains why it's difficult for a British person like me to understand.
Can somebody tell me what papers exactly refers to as UNESCO research at 6:30 about deviation between self rating and actual performance? I would be greatful for the contribution.
Thank you sir. I have few questions. 1. How a country can score 100? Ex. South Korea? 2. I found similarity with the characteristics of LTO in developed countries like the USA. But how USA become short term? 3. I found clear contradiction between femininity and Long term orientation. The characteristics are same but the examples create these contradictions.
I guess this is too much for me to answer briefly. This concept of dimensions is not necessarily easy to grasp. You should best take your time for reading the book 'Cultures and organizations'. That explain the scoring, and also how all the dimensions are about something different.
The USA probably always was Short Term. It's development is simply due to how easy it is to make money there (Since everyone can make it here also probably attracted Short Term Oriented people, whereas LTO people stayed home) As far as ressources are concerned, they have everything : arable lands, mineral ressource, petroleum, etc, etc. And they didn't have that much competition for the land, as the Native got killed by the plagues, meanwhile, the British were kickedout of the continent with the help of France and Spain, France then sold its HUGE claim of land to the US, and Spain basically lost control of its colonies...
@@gertjanhofstede www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-revision-of-Hofstede’s-model-of-national-culture%3A-Minkov/a643672ba1189b07c6ae649119aec574fc00a582?fbclid=IwAR10XFre-CYu3aWBvM_AtPmze7kcGBULQF5CugbK7Rp5JMkba1NkFr0nWOE Minkov debunks a lot of hofsteds claims
China's most abundantly-used term (vis-a-vis the West) is 不客气(氣 (bù kèqi!)-- "Don't mention it." An alternative version 没关系 (méi guān xi)-- "It doesn't matter" is almost as prevalent. (i.e. don't say "thanks" all the time is the land of LTO!).
What a dream to have the author recap the full method in person. This is so much better than reading dull papers.
Agreed
agreed
Love this! It's great to be able to actually show them the FACE to the Dimensions Founder! Thank you for doing this!!! I teach Intercultural Communication class and will definitely use!
THANK YOU FOR THESE VIDEOS! I watched all 6 of dimensions! Truly helped me with info for my Intercultural Class I teach! THANK YOU! Was cool to actually hear it from the creator! =)
I was sent the link for only 1 topic, but ended up binge watching the entire series, wow!
excellent series. Hof is a fantastic guy and his work is incredibly valuable. D.A., JD, NYC
As a member of Long term orientation society, I try to remember the rich content of LTO implications in two lines of logic for my culture.
One is that Future and change: To face the future means to face change and needs accommodation and adjustment.
Two is that Morality vs truth. Morality such as humbleness, willing to learn, is more important than absolute truth, for truth is relative, which justify the way middle way between extreme solutions.
Henry Smith but also the saddest countries
The saddests countries too
th-cam.com/video/zBQWhOSDykk/w-d-xo.html
sad :(
This dimension doesn't really have much impact in the UK where I'm from. We're right in the middle of the rankings.
This is definitely the most difficult one to understand. Here in the UK it comes out as 51 which means that you can't make a determination one way or the other, which sort of explains why it's difficult for a British person like me to understand.
very insightful and really assisted me with my findings.
Can somebody tell me what papers exactly refers to as UNESCO research at 6:30 about deviation between self rating and actual performance? I would be greatful for the contribution.
Thank you sir. I have few questions.
1. How a country can score 100? Ex. South Korea?
2. I found similarity with the characteristics of LTO in developed countries like the USA. But how USA become short term?
3. I found clear contradiction between femininity and Long term orientation. The characteristics are same but the examples create these contradictions.
I guess this is too much for me to answer briefly. This concept of dimensions is not necessarily easy to grasp. You should best take your time for reading the book 'Cultures and organizations'. That explain the scoring, and also how all the dimensions are about something different.
The USA probably always was Short Term.
It's development is simply due to how easy it is to make money there (Since everyone can make it here also probably attracted Short Term Oriented people, whereas LTO people stayed home) As far as ressources are concerned, they have everything : arable lands, mineral ressource, petroleum, etc, etc.
And they didn't have that much competition for the land, as the Native got killed by the plagues, meanwhile, the British were kickedout of the continent with the help of France and Spain, France then sold its HUGE claim of land to the US, and Spain basically lost control of its colonies...
Sometime ago Deutsche welle shoewd a doc about how depressed and suicidal students are in Korea.Its all about studying and success
th-cam.com/video/zBQWhOSDykk/w-d-xo.html
@@gertjanhofstede www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-revision-of-Hofstede’s-model-of-national-culture%3A-Minkov/a643672ba1189b07c6ae649119aec574fc00a582?fbclid=IwAR10XFre-CYu3aWBvM_AtPmze7kcGBULQF5CugbK7Rp5JMkba1NkFr0nWOE
Minkov debunks a lot of hofsteds claims
Luuuuuung term orientation 1:45 :D
Is not "The Ant and the Grasshopper" by Aesop the oldest fable in the world?
Please, in which dimension people do not tend to apologize? I need the answer soon please, I am so late in my research🙏
China's most abundantly-used term (vis-a-vis the West) is 不客气(氣 (bù kèqi!)-- "Don't mention it."
An alternative version 没关系
(méi guān xi)-- "It doesn't matter" is almost as prevalent.
(i.e. don't say "thanks" all the time is the land of LTO!).
As a short-term oriented country, why the United States is so rich ; and as a long-term oriented country, why China is not rich?
It applies to growth potential. It was clearly stated in the video.
its very difficult one to understand.
The easiest way to understand it is to think about how important saving money is in the society.
great talk
is this guy aware of the fact that every country has its own maths subjects it is so silly to compare countries by the notes of the students
Very insightful.
cross cultural communication for the win!
cant scoff the hof