Good value, but where are the seats?! ✈ LEGO City Passenger Airplane review! 60262
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2020
- An independent look at LEGO's newest City-line passenger jet, which actually also carries cargo! There are 8 minifigs, an airport terminal & air traffic control tower, and some ground equipment.
⏩ LEGO speed builds: / jangbuilds
▶️ Chill real-time builds: / purebuilds
🟠 Patreon: / jangbricks
Become a supporter & join my community for exclusive chats, your minifig added to New Jang City, & more rewards!
My preferred online shop is Amazon: amzn.to/2qllzg5
If you use my affiliate links I may get a tiny commission to help keep the channels going!
More places I shop: jangbricks.com/where-i-shop
LEGO news & set research: www.Brickset.com
All comments are moderated to maintain a safe, positive environment. Bad behavior is rejected, abusers are reported & blocked. jangbricks.com/commentpolicy
✔️ TOP VIEWER QUESTIONS answered: jangbricks.com/FAQ
🏙 My LEGO city: youtube.be/channel/UCdgkQ55cD...
🌐 www.JANGBRiCKS.com
📷 / jangbricks4real
👤 / jangbricks
🐤 / jangbricks
All of my verified media accounts: jangbricks.com/verified
(Assume anything else is fake!)
The opinions I express are mine and mine alone and not for sale for any price. Ads, when shown, are selected & placed by TH-cam itself. - บันเทิง
I feel Lego City is aimed way younger now than it was five years ago. Everything is bigger and not necessarily better. Good review!
I know what you mean it sort of started when they put those "exclusive minifigues in the sets too tie In the Lego city TV show
Not just 5 years ago, the age range changed ever since 2018. But the early 2000s LEGO city sets were still the best
Definitely what I thought. The sets that came out when I was younger was sometimes more realistic but still playable, but now they're more playable than ever. (Except the speed champions ones of course:) )
@@ministig63ace Lego still has a lot for older crowds, especially with star wars, but they have sadly been aiming much younger lately. Luckily, the adult based sets we do get are amazingly detailed, with speed champions series 3 and the modular series being better then ever before. Still will miss when we got realistic transportation or city buildings, but with the MOC community taking off I expect that fan made sets will take care of that in time
Some of my first sets were lego firefighter and police. Tiny tiny models with some pretty decent detail. I upgraded to lego racers and bionicle.
I don't know if lego is making them tinier, but we are paying significantly more for less stuff.
Lego: Puts bionicle in every set they can.
Still Lego: Doesn't accept bionicle idea project.
Is like they gonna do it on they own in the future or something
Whats a bionicle
Well, Bionicle was an official theme...
Yeah. What's bionicle
@@king_goose you're joking right?
It’s just a Spirit Airlines flight - seats not necessarily included!
only business class gets seats
laughs in Ryanair
@@ClaxMaxtron *only the rich people can get the seats.*
What county is that company in?
Wyatt I flew spirit once and I was traumatized
It's strange how Lego have thought that the wing piece is acceptable for so long. It takes up too much room in plane interiors when it could easily be replaced with a technic alternative that is 2 piecees, attached on either side
Agree
Yep that way we could have more seats rather than just 5 for such an airliner
Totally agree, hated it for years - two pieces or a brick built (probably too expensive/parts intensive) alternative would be much better
I think the big consideration would be how much strain such a big piece would put on Technic pins since the pins would be far away from the centre point of gravity.
@@Shadeius run a couple of beams underneath for support? I mean the technic cargo plane did it.
Honestly I much preferred the city airport from the early 2010s that had an actual decent sized terminal
You mean the set where there was a big terminal and a small plane instead of a big plane and a small terminal?
@@kikokusy9974 No the set where the was a big plane and a big terminal
Kiko Valdez yessirrr😃
Are you talking about the 3182 lego city airport?
Was that the red and white one
You could spread the existing seats around to improve social distancing.
Yes
LoL xD
Lol! 🤣😂 yeah I heard COVID was pretty bad in LEGO city.
This needs to be pinned to the comments lol
Maybe it is Social Distance Airlines plane? 😁
I don’t care if it’s 5 am. I need answers to where the seats are.
Scoutron I DONT NEED SLEEP I NEED ANSWERS!!!!
Social distancing
3 am for me and I needed to find out as well
A copilot would be nice.
The Piraka stole them
Plane: Has space for two pilots
The set: Contains one pilot
The missing co-pilot: Am I a joke to you?
There are two pilots.
Epic, dude, that’s a flight attendant not a pilot, there is a female pilot and a male FA
Sad part is the “pilot” is wearing co pilot stripes on her shoulder 😂
"Because it's so plain" I see what you did there.
Legit heard as I read
it's so.... *PLANE* 8-)))
Has anyone ever noticed that jang kind of looks like wolverine in some way
Omg yes, I hope he takes this as a compliment
WANNABEME yeah
Specifically, in the sideburns way.
@@hagridsham1184 it IS a compliment if you ask me
yes! never expected him to be so good looking in the earlier days of this channel lol
Seriously, every LEGO set that has a plane with space for two pilots should include just that: two pilots. Especially here, since it’s a $100 set that has a plane meant to be flown by two people, and you’ll just have an extra pilot’s seat.
Eitan Frank especially since they could include one male and one female pilot to offer options for any child.
Next time I ride in a plane I will be grateful that they give us something to sit on instead of rolling around like minifigs in this flight.
Jang, I’m surprised you didn’t notice! The “pilot” in this set has only three golden stripes on her shoulders, which makes her a first officer (co-pilot) and only second in command. A captain (pilot) has four shoulder stripes and is first in command. Thanks for the review!
They should have given it way more seats
Yeh I agree, there could of been way more seats if they stop using a single part for the wings.
Bizarro Brick Films they shouldn’t have included the cargo section when they could have done a separate plane just for cargo.
JB Bricks the wing blocked it
I don't understand why Lego always feels the need to group their large plain and airport models together into a single set. It would be better both design-wise and price-wise to release one big set of *just* an airplane, and then another big set of *just* an airport. For example, had this set been split into two builds, you could have the airplane for about $80, which I think more people would prefer. Then instead of a tiny airport that has barely any playability, you could have a compatible police-stationed-sized one, with a full checkin, baggage claim, and concourse.
LEGO has lost their direction with Lego City releases.
@@dmonsef I think lots of sets are thrown into city for lack of a better category. I don't really consider "jungle" or "arctic" or "deep sea" city, even though the sets are some of my favorites.
i think the main reason is that, to kids, what good is an airport without any planes? and what good is a plane without an airport to load/unload passengers to/from? Two stand alone sets of those things, at least from LEGO's perspective, wouldn't sell and it's more appealing to children for both to be packaged in one set. Plus people might see an airplane and an airport as separate sets and will be upset they need to buy both to get the maximum amount of play value.
Why are the terminals getting smaller and worse each passing year?
Because Lego does not care so they only build a smaller airport and the price will make it higher so they can earn money from it
It could be because they just choose to focus more on the plane and not the terminal since the plane looks more realistic, colour scheme, design and the cockpit looks more modern and realistic.
Where are the seats?
*HEY*
Install the seats. Get the passengers on the plane. And take off.
lol😂
Lego: making a fully plane, NO
Lego: don't make a fully plane but an aweful tiny Airport that nobody needs, YES
Elias Eder What's a fully plane? I'm not trying to mock you or anything I honestly don't understand.
@@orangecayman520 A fully plane means a well designed aircraft with full interior and yeah,more seats
More realistic..... Understand that?
Calvin Mx LEGO isn’t supposed to be realistic
To be honest, for people with other airport and airplane sets, at least for me, I’m fine with the small airport because I’ll just combine it with the other airports to make one large airport.
I mean... Voya Nui on that screen? And the Ideas Bionicle set being cancelled? Make up your mind, LEGO •_•
Maybe that was just an Easter egg by a fan/designer.
There is probably a ton of BIONICLE fans within LEGO and this is probably their way of doing nods when they can't get their desire to have them return either 🤣
@Arzola I was huge Bionicle fan as kid but I totally missed G2 because back then I wasn't interest in Lego. I was lucky to buy G2 Kopaka this year and kind of regret not being interest back then. If Lego brings Bionicle back I will buy!
producing a fully brick-built IDEAS bionicle set is a whole different thing from easter eggs on stickers, they put references to old themes in graphic design all the time
Arzola G2 Only flopped because lego didn’t market it, Ninja, Chima, Nexo Knights, Monkey kid, Elves and friends all get a full tv show. Bionicle G2 got 30 second animations with one voice actor for all characters
Interesting that the space this plane has to fit extra cargo is almost as big as the space that seats the actual passengers on a *passenger plane*. How much cargo do these guys have?
They brought the whole house including the family car lol
It is a combi, it carries separate unrelated cargo.
I wish LEGO made a Concorde UCS
I doubt they even will considering 1, that it went out of service in 2003 and 2, they have never really cared much about aircraft in LEGO, sadly except for in technique
@@ourmilotin2819 They did do that Dreamliner (787) set back in 2008 though, didn't they?
MaxMOCs I think it might also have to do with the crash in 2000. Maybe LEGO doesn’t want to portray a plane that was involved in such a fatal accident?
That would be cool if there is a Lego Concorde
That’s a great idea but sadly I don’t think Lego would do it unless there are TONS of submissions on the Ideas forum.
"We are now approaching Voya Nui, famous for its national anthem: The Piraka Rap.
YO! YO! PIRAKA!
Land of the bonkls
When i get this plane,i will change the cargo area and add up more seats
Same :/
Good, this 5 seats are dumb
I’d just remove the bathroom
@@coronaman-9478 well tell the passengers to bring a bottle or a bucket lol
I get that a lot of people are disappointed there is only 5 seats on the “passenger” airplane, but when I think about it, I think it’s cool how they included the service area and toilet just like every passenger plane has and makes it semi-realistic!
2:38 I think it's pretty accurate though, that's why imported cars come so scratched and dented. 🤔😂
I actually quite like this set, it brings nostalgia for me as a kid building my own airport with whatever color bricks I had and using my cargo plane converted into a passenger plane. I like the colors and I think the look of the plane is nice. My only real complaint it that wing piece. I think lego should do a new piece that includes the underside of the plane and wing I think it would open up much more opportunities for room within. I'm planning on getting one of these and I'll see what I can do to customize that.
Same i will customize it to when i get it
Surely 1 of the very first things i am going to try is to reduce the cargo room to half where you can put inside just suitcases, bags or boxes with some items, then try to add up at least 7 or 8 more seats so there can fit in at least 12 to 13 passengers.
@@GoodnightFromHim to have in such a huge plane only 5 seats its simply ridiculous lol, when you look from the outside you will think there will fitt in easily 15 to 20 passengers, the cargo part also spoil the whole space.
Im gonna make it into a DC 10 and adding way more seats
If that plane is flying towards Voya-nui then I'm pretty sure it won't come back R.I.P.
would explain the alternate expressions on the passengers
Not if the TOA have anything to say about it
Yo yo *P I R A K A*
Unless the Pikaka are actually great hosts for the minifigures as they just incorporated a great business to the locals.
@@themadmachad1079 gang on the loose, nothing you can do...
I can see a lot of similarities between this aircraft and an Airbus A340. The only this wrong is that Airbus does not use flight yokes, they use sticks.
I dont see the connection between an a340 and whatever this is. Its closer to an a330 than a340
Well... its going to become a DC 10, at least for me
I remember when they made the planes like the large blue passenger or the green cargo and they actually looked like planes
The current City sets are an,overpriced,disgrace.
Well LEGO has always been just that. The difference being they instead of improving they go down the toilet. The typical company move by improving one thing and ruining 100 of other things till the very said company goes down the toilet. I am genuenly surprised LEGO still exist to be honest.
@@P33b4Ugo5omwh3r3 but the sets are still good though. How have they "ruined" things in sets? I don't see sets failing miserably and everyone hating them. They are still around because people buy the sets. These sets are also primarily aimed at children so of course you wouldn't find it appealing. Does that mean Lego Duplo is bad just because you can't use it? No. It just mean you aren't the target demographic.
Mahsofabish Weenie That is so Right!👍
P33b4Ugo5omwh3r3 if you think Lego is bad look at roblox 2 months ago they added a 4th or 5th category that is games that are played a lot it’s so stupid and they aren’t refusing to fix their stupid censor system even though the player base is begging for it if ur account is registered as you being under 13 you can’t see numbers and you can’t say simple role play phrases like “ima go shower” and if u are registered as 13+ you can see umbers and the censor is slightly less strict. So if you say something the system doesn’t like it turns it all into hashtags. They are also thinking of allowing game devs to make their games only accessible
To the people who pay monthly for roblox “premium” which is a whole other mistake because some games need you to pay a small one time fee to access them (these games are incredibly welly made) so at this point I think roblox might drive itself into the ground if they don’t listen to the community more. Like hell they listen to the developers who go to the yearly RDC (Roblox Developer Confrence” each year but there is only like 2-300 people who are invited each year and they show their ideas and get a lot of feedback but as far I am sure they don’t use a lot of it! So as far as I know Lego is doing incredibly apart from their prices because heck they have an entire line for fan submissions that got support from other fans!!! Eh that is my opinion on what u said sorry if this is a bit mean anyways have a nice day
I can see what you're talking about the 2010 cargo train was 130 USD and the 2020 one is 230 USD and they basicly have the same things and the 2010 airport was 100 bucks and had a great terminal but this one... is the same ammount and is horrible
I feel LEGO city has slowly been falling into the hands of the preschoolers. I wish that they would have removed the car area and put more seats. Nice review though! 😄
HUD BRICKS exactly. Back when they used to make a plane that could carry passengers then another that could carry cargo.
I wish they would change the large plane wing piece to 2 separate pieces,that only cover the walls.
The cargo bay should have been only 8 studs long,not 12,and the bathroom should have been maybe a stud row smaller. Luggage goes into the cargo bay,the plane is too large with too many passengers to need a terrible car taking up all the space.
I wish lego would release a 747 or a a380 airplane instead of basically the same airplane just with a different configuration
But it will be more expensive and it will be too big.....
I like how city has been giving us more interesting civilian minifigures recently.
That rear facing seat in the cabin is for a flight attendant- so this “passenger” plane carries three crew and four passengers!
One thing I really like about the new style of reviews is that it helps me get a better size of the builds. I didn’t realize how big this plane really was until seeing you holding it in the beginning. Great review Jang, I definitely agree that there should be more seats in this plane,
"It's a car. It holds one person and it rolls" YES! :)
That’s why LEGO is so cool they can use any piece any where, like they used a bucket handle for the lever
And at the start I thought
everyone was just standing on the plane
Who is you? Q ?
will you ever get around to reviewing one of the original airplanes? the blue one from 2006/07
That one probably has triple the number of seats than this plane
The original minifig airplane was released in 1985. ;)
He could if you donate to his Patreon and request a specific set.
I have the blue one it has seats and even a sliding door I believe its from the 2012 set I think.
The 2006 one was pretty cool I also remember it could have been that era they had a big blue one and red one one came with an actual airport building 4203 I think
I have the blue one from 2006, it stands as one of my all time favorite city plane sets from LEGO. And yes, it can carry over two times the passengers(or more if you modified the rear kitchen area a bit) than this new one.
Maybe the number of seats have been updated to reflect the realities of travel in 2020?
Love how there's been a ton of Bionicle nods in recent sets, only for Lego to not approve the Ideas project!
After last week I say yes that feels sorta mean and salty tho I'm sure the BIONICLE Voya Nui reference was meant out of respect. Like if we knew something in the works it would be cool and exciting but no it's a punch to the gut :(
Yeah. I'm pretty sure that reference was put into this set WAY before Ideas set was denied, but it still leaves bad impression. Unfortunate timing.
Also, it's kinda funny when LEGO as a company wants to distance themselves from Bionicle theme, but individual designers still loves this theme and reference it as often as possible.
@@nihili4196 There is absolutely NOTHING to suggest they are distancing themselves from Bionicle. The designers answer to management for what they design, so it's safe to say LEGO is fine with including such Easter Eggs.
Who else thinks they should make a ucs type plane, like a minifig scale boing 747.
Needs a bigger tail, but otherwise I really like this plane!
As long as you have the pieces, it shouldn’t be a huge project to rebuild the tail.
You know with that tail and with the engines from the cargo plane from 2016 you could easily make it into a dc-10 which is what im planning on doing when i get the set
I know the guy who designed this plane. He said it was originally designed as a trijet but LEGO legal then got involved and told him the third engine had to be removed because it looked too much like a dc-10. That’s why the vertical stabilizer is so small. There is supposed to be an engine under the fin and above the brick.
Just revisiting my bionicles and hero factory childhood.
FINALLY they added more realistic flight controls and instruments, after many years of wait they finally did it although there is much more space they could have used for seating
If you turn the seats so they face eachother and put a small table in between them then it kinda looks more like the plane would be a private jet. It works far better as that than a passenger jet, in my opinion.
“There’s this little latch here to keep the cargo door from opening when you don’t want it to”. That haunting moment when your habit of binge watching Air Crash Investigation tv shows while building Lego suddenly takes an unexpected twist.
I actually really like this plane, I’ve never had a big aircraft and will definitely buy it when It comes out, regardless of the lack of seats
This is low-budget airlines 😂😂😂
Thank you for the review. I would like to buy it, and I am 90% sure... The only thing which stops me (10%) is "seats", bro... I agree, I wish there will be more sits. I'm still thinking
I’ve been watching this channel for 4 years now and I still can’t get over how many legos he has and what he can make it’s crazy
Great review, as always.
The interior definitely lacks seats, but at least it seems super easy to modify it. Way easier than what's up with many vehicles from more action-heavy themes, were like 80% of potential interior is used for some technic-based play feature...
This set looks really wonderful, though! Really love it!
If I got this set, I would turn it into one of those high wing, city hopper aircraft such as the BAe 146. Good lego review
I feel as though this plane is amazing, mostly because this one will take you to a tropical island and combine it with the 2018 passenger train, they look good together. Also the airplane from 2016 is a good casual passenger plane and now having one that will take you to a tropical island is great. It looks and is so work alongside that old one.
Honestly there should be at least minimum 10 passenger seats in my opinion, its simply very ridiculous to have only 5 passenger seats in such a huge Boing lol, really a shame. You really need have to modify this plane by yourself to have more seats, i would not mind to make the cargo space smaller just to put there several suitcases or boxes instead putting in there a whole car, then add up 6 to 8 more seats so it can be at least a 11 to 13 passenger plane. I mean when you look the size of this plane from the outside you would think there would easily fit in 20 to 30 passengers.
In real life passenger planes carry some cargo for extra money. So technically the plane in the set is accurate to a passenger plane.
well,yes,they do,but it doesnt take up that much space
The fewer seats there are, the more the airline can charge for a ticket.
1:45 Those are really nice looking cockpit parts! I think it might be the most realistic looking one theyve made so far
A Happy @jangbricks - make me happy too ! - great review Jang ... this is a set I’m definitely going to get in due course I’ll be fascinated to see how you incorporate it into your City :)
Imagine flying to Voya Nui
"Yeah I feel like going on a death vacation--"
I sincerely think the lego passenger terminal 60104 set is way better lego did not have to make new molds for the plane nose and back the terminal isint big there is not much seats on the plane there is not a fueling tank and the stickers aren't aligned well and there is more cargo due to the fact its called a passenger plane and there is Less pieces and it can't pose well Like in a take off position and its not tall and standing like the others the other set did have large peices and more pieces and so I am upset with this set.
It’s been so long since I’ve seen this channel. Glad to be back.
Great video once again Jang! I absolutely agree with everything you've said in this video. Love you work!
Budget airlines be like:
Or expensive airlines
Lego City just feels like Lego Modular Buildings for children. I wouldn't have minded if there were more seats and no luggage area.
Man, I'll never forget getting my first big LEGO set, the 2004 reissue City Airport of the Century Skyway. It was my birthday and my mom let me unwrap it but then immediately had to go to church, and because we went to evening mass I didn't have time to even open it before I had to go to bed. I loved the rolling garage door
Fun fact the pilot is only wearing three stripes on her shoulder so that would only qualify her as a first officer (co-pilot) not as a captain.
Nobody :
Jang : I expected to poo on the price .
Me as a minifigure:
*looks at the screen in the plane*
*realizes it's Voya Nui*
Oh no...
*Piraka Rap intensifies*
So that's how the piraka ACTUALLY got there.
I remember getting the passenger airplane for my birthday in 2006. I was so excited because I was obsessed with planes (still kind of am), and I had so much fun building and playing with it.
Thanks for the detailed review. I like how you switched the background colour when you focused on the mini-figures.
What I don’t like about this set is that it has seats for two pilots, but only has one, and there’s a service cart, but no flight attendant. Also, the terminal is super small! I like the 2010 3182 airplane a lot better. It had better quality, and had a lot more. Although, there was only one passenger lol.
Another thing: Does anyone else not like the fact that they’re starting to NAME some of the mini figures? It’s kid of annoying, because I liked making up my own, and now there’s ‘Duke Detain’ and ‘Poppy Star’ and ‘Frey’s McCloud’. It’s kinda stupid.
The minifigure in the blue suit is the fight attendant
Wow this set sure looks different to every other Lego City airplane ever.
The majority of Passenger planes IRL look pretty much the same. I dont know what your complaining about.
But the canopy piece looks more acurate to real life airplanes
One of the best sets I have ever seen in lego city
I’m so glad you pointed out the head of that minifigure and how it’s similar to mini Jang!
This is absolutely not the face I imagined with that voice.
Yeah I always get the same reaction
Same
That’s a jang fig
Great review! -and yes I didnt need to watch it before knowing it was great
"This latch keeps the main cargo door from flying open when you don't want it to."
The DC10 and 747 have left the chat.
Would be good if there wasnt a back section to out a car
Wow, this plane carries CARgo ahaha!
Please explain why this was necessary.
This let me remember my childhood, thank you :)
Nice review!
The weird thing is that in Europe, lego sets are technically more expensive than in the US. A good example is this set. It costs 100$ but also 100€. 100$ are worth less than 100€, more like 85€.
Ah, such a nostalgic set. It reminds me of the old days when it was possible to travel around the world. But shouldn't this be in some kind of historical theme?
The plane is really stubby imo
Thanks soooooo much! I wanted to find a nice review about this new set but there were only a few
Suddenly, my favourite reviewer posted one on it
I've taken care of the non alignment of the colors the stickers. Used the extra trim on the sticker sheet to put next or above it. It's just enough wide to get the colors aligned. I'm loving the set!
the front side of the plane is so ugly wth
Its supposed to be more realistic.
I'm sorry, but the new lego city sets feel incredibly lazy
Another Nice Review, Jang!
i love your videos!
I came here for the droplet of bionicle easter egg lego but in here. Like a starved animal. Im pathetic and lego is cruel.
I've been waiting for this review for so long!
I LOVE THIS! ALSO BEEN A FAN FOR 5 years
Yay, I couldnt wait for this review!👍👍🙏🙏
So I saw the title and started thinking about "my correct" number of seats for this set;
First, I thought 12, that seemed pretty reasonable because of the length. Then, I remembered it's Lego, so 10 would have been my estimate. Then, I remembered the title, so it must be 8 seats!
Finally, I find out it's actually 5!? A "passenger" plane... Oh well, you can always mod it to fit more ;)
Hey jang I think the hollow space on The underside is where you put the landing gear when you take it off instead of putting it down somewhere so it’s just easier
Though the setup of the rear landinggear looks strange, it IS pretty accurate! On real big planes the center gear is placed further to the back then those under the wing!
Combination planes with passengers and cargo do/did exist as well. I've for instance flown on a KLM 747 with this configuration...
I’ve always loved the LEGO city plans sets! I’d love to see you do a comparison of all the LEGO city “commercial” planes over the years